Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document585 Filed02/09/10 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 KRISTIN M. PERRY, ET AL., No. C 09-02292 VRW (JCS)
8 Plaintiff(s), NOTICE OF REFERENCE AND ORDER
SETTING HEARING ON DEFENDANT-
9 v. INTERVENORS MOTION TO COMPEL
COMPLIANCE WITH NONPARTY
10 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, ET AL., DOCUMENT SUBPOENAS [Docket No.
472]
United States District Court

11 Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
For the Northern District of California

12
13 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
14 The above matter has been to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for Defendant-Intervenor's
15 Motion to Compel Compliance with Nonparty Document Subpoenas (the "Motion").
16 The hearing on the Motion has been set for February 22, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom
17 A, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
18 On February 2, 2010, Third Party Californians Against Eliminating Basic Rights’ (CAEBR)
19 filed an opposition to the Motion. In their opposition CAEBR states they have produced all
20 documents that “contain, refer, or relate to any arguments for or against Proposition 8, except for
21 communications among CAEBR’s core group and communications CAEBR received from other
22 third parties who are contesting the motion to compel.”
23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that by February 15, 2010, CAEBR shall file a declaration
24 justifying the inclusion in its core group of the individuals identified in the letter dated February 1,
25 2010, from Kari Krogseng to Jesse Panuccio.
26 ELECTRONIC FILING AND COURTESY COPIES
27 Please refer to Civil L. R. 5-4 and General Order No. 45 for the Northern District of
28 California for information relating to electronic filing procedures and requirements. All documents
 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document585 Filed02/09/10 Page2 of 2

1 shall be filed in compliance with the Civil Local Rules. Documents not filed in compliance with
2 those rules will not be considered by the Court.
3 BEFORE NOON ON THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING THE ELECTRONIC
4 FILING, THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO LODGE DIRECTLY WITH CHAMBERS ONE
5 CONFORMED, PAPER COPY OF EACH DOCUMENT, WHICH IS TO BE DESIGNATED
6 "JCS’S CHAMBERS' COPY."
7 The failure of counsel or a party to abide by this Order may result in sanctions pursuant to
8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
United States District Court

11 Dated: February 8, 2010

For the Northern District of California

12 JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28