Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Overview..................................................................................................................................... 1
Summary of Benefits............................................................................................................................... 1
Building on Experience ........................................................................................................................... 1
Installed ACCR........................................................................................................................................ 2
Applications and Benefits......................................................................................................... 3
Increased Ampacity................................................................................................................................. 3
Large Increases in Power Transfer Along Existing Rights of Way.......................................................... 3
Material Properties .................................................................................................................... 5
Composite Core ...................................................................................................................................... 5
Outer Strands.......................................................................................................................................... 5
Properties of Standard Constructions ..................................................................................................... 6
Conductor Test Data ................................................................................................................. 8
Tensile Strength ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Stress-Strain Behavior ............................................................................................................................ 8
Electrical Resistance............................................................................................................................... 9
Axial Impact Strength .............................................................................................................................. 9
Torsional Ductility.................................................................................................................................. 10
Short Circuit Behavior ........................................................................................................................... 10
Crush Strength ...................................................................................................................................... 10
Lightning Resistance............................................................................................................................. 11
Accessory Test Data ............................................................................................................... 12
Terminations and Joints/Splices ........................................................................................................... 12
Suspension Assemblies ........................................................................................................................ 14
Dampers................................................................................................................................................ 16
Stringing Blocks (Sheaves) ................................................................................................................... 17
Installation Guidelines ............................................................................................................ 18
General ................................................................................................................................................. 18
Installation Equipment........................................................................................................................... 18
Quick Reference ...................................................................................................................... 20
Properties.............................................................................................................................................. 20
Accessories........................................................................................................................................... 20
Questions/Contacts............................................................................................................................... 21
Disclaimer ................................................................................................................................ 22
Design Support
3M offers technical support resources and can tailor the
3M Composite Conductor to suit your specific needs. Our
highly qualified engineers offer design support using
ruling span calculations for a rapid assessment of the
suitability of the 3M Composite Conductor in a given
situation. In overhead power transmission, 3M has worked
closely with customers to develop & understand a wide
variety of solutions where the 3M Composite Conductor
400VDC outdoor test line installation at Oak
Ridge, Tennessee. may be successfully used. Customer interaction is a key
step to fully optimize the conductor, thus providing the
the existing right-of-way by 72%. A section of 477-kcmil expertise to successfully implement the 3M Composite
Composite Conductor was strung at a new outdoor test Conductor, whether the needs are simply material
facility in Oak Ridge, TN. The line is highly properties or a complete design solution.
instrumented, and will be used to study sag and tensions
under high temperatures and severe thermal cycling
Torsional
Short Circuit Ductility
Creep Lightning
Extensive laboratory testing has been performed with a variety of different tests passed.
AMPS
ACSR
40 1590 100C
Sag Limit
1,500
38
Large Increases in Power Transfer Along Situations in which the bulk lines may be limited by
underlying (n-1) reliability, conventional approaches
Existing Rights of Way employ new lines, new right-of-ways or new towers on
Where power increases on the order of 100% are needed to existing right-of-ways. The solution with the 3M
cover periodic emergency conditions, conventional Composite Conductor is to simply replace the existing
approaches employ new lines, new right-of-ways or new conductor. This results in a 100% power gain with no
Environmentally
Sensitive Areas
Application Special Siting
Situations
Guide
Changing
Clearance
Avoid Tower
Aging Structures Requirements
Replacement
Outer Strands
The outer strands are composed of a temperature-resistant
aluminum-zirconium alloy (Figure 2), which permits
operation at high temperatures (210ºC continuous, 240ºC
emergency). The Al-Zr alloy is a hard aluminum alloy
with properties and hardness similar to standard 1350-H19
aluminum. However the microstructure is designed to
maintain strength after operating at high temperatures; that
Diameter
indiv Core in 0.088 0.096 0.105 0.114 0.073 0.082 0.080 0.083 0.086 0.092 0.095 0.103
indiv Al in 0.114 0.124 0.135 0.146 0.156 0.175 0.133 0.138 0.144 0.153 0.158 0.172
Core in 0.27 0.29 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.41 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.46 0.47 0.51
Total Diameter in 0.72 0.78 0.86 0.93 0.99 1.11 1.20 1.24 1.29 1.38 1.42 1.54
Area
Al in^2 0.264 0.312 0.374 0.437 0.500 0.624 0.749 0.811 0.874 0.999 1.061 1.249
Total Area in^2 0.307 0.363 0.435 0.508 0.579 0.724 0.844 0.914 0.985 1.126 1.195 1.407
Weight lbs/linear ft 0.380 0.449 0.539 0.630 0.717 0.896 1.044 1.130 1.218 1.392 1.478 1.740
Breaking Load
Core lbs 8,204 9,695 11,632 13,583 14,843 18,556 17,716 19,183 20,669 23,622 25,089 29,527
Aluminum lbs 5,773 6,704 7,844 9,160 10,248 12,578 15,041 16,287 17,548 20,055 21,301 25,069
Complete Cable lbs 13,977 16,398 19,476 22,743 25,091 31,134 32,758 35,470 38,217 43,677 46,389 54,596
Modulus
Core Msi 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4
Aluminum Msi 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.4 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Complete Cable Msi 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 10.7 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6
Thermal Elongation
Core 10^-6/F 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5
Aluminum 10^-6/F 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8
Complete Cable 10^-6/F 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2
Heat Capacity
Core W-sec/ft-C 9 11 13 15 17 22 21 22 24 28 29 35
Aluminum W-sec/ft-C 137 162 194 226 259 324 390 423 455 520 553 650
Geometric Mean Radius ft 0.0244 0.0265 0.0290 0.0313 0.0335 0.0375 0.0404 0.0420 0.0436 0.0466 0.0480 0.0521
Reactance (1
ft Spacing, 60hz)
Inductive Xa ohms/mile 0.4508 0.4407 0.4296 0.4202 0.4121 0.3986 0.3895 0.3847 0.3801 0.3720 0.3684 0.3585
Capacitive X'a ohms/mile 0.1040 0.1015 0.0988 0.0965 0.0945 0.0912 0.0890 0.0878 0.0867 0.0847 0.0838 0.0814
Diameter
indiv Core mm 2.2 2.4 2.7 2.9 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.6
indiv Al mm 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.7 4.0 4.4 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.0 4.4
Core mm 6.7 7.3 8.0 8.7 9.3 10.4 10.1 10.5 10.9 11.7 12.1 13.1
Total Diameter mm 18.3 19.9 21.8 23.5 25.2 28.1 30.4 31.6 32.8 35.1 36.2 39.2
Area
Al mm^2 170 201 241 282 322 403 483 523 564 645 685 806
Total Area mm^2 198 234 281 328 374 467 545 590 635 726 771 908
Weight kg/m 0.566 0.669 0.802 0.937 1.067 1.333 1.553 1.682 1.812 2.071 2.200 2.589
Breaking Load
Core kN 36.5 43.1 51.7 60.4 66.0 82.5 78.8 85.3 91.9 105.1 111.6 131.3
Aluminum kN 25.7 29.8 34.9 40.7 45.6 55.9 66.9 72.4 78.1 89.2 94.7 111.5
Complete Cable kN 62.2 72.9 86.6 101.2 111.6 138.5 145.7 157.8 170.0 194.3 206.4 242.9
Modulus
Core GPa 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 216
Aluminum GPa 55 55 55 55 55 51 55 55 55 55 55 55
Complete Cable GPa 78 78 78 78 77 74 73 73 73 73 73 73
Thermal Elongation
Core 10^-6/C 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3
Aluminum 10^-6/C 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
Complete Cable 10^-6/C 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.6 16.3 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5
Heat Capacity
Core W-sec/m-C 31 36 44 51 57 71 68 74 79 91 96 113
Aluminum W-sec/m-C 449 530 636 743 849 1,062 1,280 1,386 1,494 1,707 1,813 2,134
Geometric Mean Radius cm 0.7424 0.807 0.884 0.9552 1.021 1.1416 1.2302 1.2801 1.3288 1.4205 1.464 1.5882
Reactance (1
ft Spacing, 60hz)
Inductive Xa ohms/km 0.2817 0.2754 0.2685 0.2626 0.2576 0.2491 0.2434 0.2404 0.2376 0.2325 0.2302 0.2241
Capacitive X'a ohms/km 0.065 0.0635 0.0618 0.0603 0.0591 0.057 0.0556 0.0549 0.0542 0.0529 0.0524 0.0509
35000
Table 5: Tensile Strength Tests Conductor
Stress * Area Fraction (psi)
10000
5000
Aluminum
0
Stress-Strain Behavior 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
% Strain
The stress-strain behavior of the 795-kcmil 3M Composite
Conductor was determined in accordance with the 1999
Aluminum Association Standard entitled, “A Method of Figure 4: Stress vs. Strain Curves for 795-kcmil Conductor and
Stress-Strain Testing of Aluminum Conductor and ACSR.” Constituents
On the conductor, the test was started at 1000 lbs (4.4 kN)
and the strain measurement set to zero. Load was
Equations for 795 kcmil Stress-Strain Curves
then incrementally increased to 30%, 50%, 70%, 4 3
and 75% of RBS, with the load relaxed to 1000 Conductor Initial: Stress (psi) = -17,424*(%Strain) + 35,102*(%Strain) –
2
66,240*(%Strain) + 103,029*(%Strain) - 73
lbs between each increase. Finally, the conductor Conductor Final: Stress (psi) = 122,238*(%Strain) – 19,646
was pulled to destruction. A repeat test was Initial Elastic Modulus: 10,055,000 psi
performed on the core, loading to the same
strains as measured in the conductor test. Core Initial:
4 3
Stress (psi) = - 50,165*(%Strain) + 58,264*(%Strain) –
2
89,616*(%Strain) + 362,547*(%Strain)
Curve fitting was applied per the Aluminum Core Final: Stress (psi) = 343,705* (%Strain) – 6,444
Association Standard, including derivation of the 4 3
aluminum constituent. A set of curves without Aluminum Initial Stress (psi) = -20,220*(%Strain) + 40,733*(%Strain) –
2
65,838*(%Strain) + 61,795*(%Strain) - 85
the creep addition for the 795-kcmil Composite Aluminum Final Stress (psi) = 86,746* (%Strain) – 21,762
Conductor and constituents is shown in Figure 4.
In the graph, the core and aluminum curves are NOTE: These equations are not normalized by the constituent area fraction
multiplied by their respective area fraction in the
conductor. translated to descend from 0.45% strain. The polynomial
equations derived from the testing and fitted to a 4th order
The resulting polynomial curves are corrected to pass
are shown in the box above.
through zero for the initial curves, and the final curves are
50000
5000 Sample/sec
RBS
45000 Projections
Projections
40000
35000
30000
Load (lbs)
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12
Time (seconds)
Figure 5: Impact test tower used to evaluate shock- Figure 6: Load vs. time for the 795- kcmil Impact test
loading behavior showing the impact-breaking load exceeds the RBS
value Composite Conductor Composite Conductor
Impact velocity is 24ft/sec, with an initial nominal pre-
tension of 400 lbs. The sample is pulled to nominal
tension at the bottom using a fabric strap fitted to a steel
bar through an eye at the end of a PLP helical rod dead-
end. A load cell measures the applied impact load and the
data is recorded as a graph of load vs. time (Figure 6). The
impact weight almost stopped dead after the blow, rather
This test evaluates how well the 795-kcmil Composite ACSR - surface
300
Conductor tolerates twisting loads that can occur during ACCR - surface
ACSR - core
installation. Resin end-fittings were applied to a length of
ACCR ACSR
Tensile Strength
Testing of compression dead-ends from Alcoa-Fujikura,
was performed with a gauge length of 10 ft (3.05 m), in
which one end was terminated with the compression dead-
end, and the other with an epoxy end-fitting. To test the
joint, a 40 ft (12 m) gauge length was used, and two
conductor sections were connected using the joint, and
then the two free ends were terminated with epoxy end-
fittings. The samples were tested to failure in tension.
Thimble-Clevis
Formed Wire
Dead-End
Structural Support
Rods
ACCR Conductor
Figure 12: Helical-rod dead-end assembly Figure 14: Testing of helical-rod joint to destruction in
a tensile test.
Aluminum
Strap
ACCR Conductor
Turning Angle
Turning angle tests ensure the 3M Composite Conductor
can carry high mechanical tensile loads through a 32°
turning angle without failure in the bending region, as
shown in Figure 16. For the 795-kcmil Composite
Conductor, no damage or wire failures were reported at the
peak 40% RBS tensile loading. This was confirmed after
the full disassembly of each of the suspension and
conductor layers. In actual field use where large turning
Figure 17: Unbalanced load test carried 15%RBS
before slipping.
Elevated Temperature
As with terminations and joints, the temperature
differences between the conductor and the suspension
assembly must be clearly understood to ensure the
assembly retains its strength. In the test, the conductor
was heated to 240°C while under a tension of 15% RBS
for 168 hours. Using embedded thermocouples, the
temperature was monitored at the elastomer insert for a
795-kcmil 3M Composite Conductor. It was found to be
54°C when the conductor was at 240°C. Based on this
temperature information and the rating of the elastomer
material to 110°C, it is believed that these materials have
sufficient durability at the maximum temperatures at which
the suspension operates.
Figure 16: Suspension Assembly for 795-kcmil 3M
Aeolian Vibration
The purpose of this testing is to demonstrate that the
conductor accessories will protect the 3M Brand
Composite Conductor when it is subjected to dynamic,
wind induced bending stresses. Laboratory aeolian
vibration testing at higher levels of activity than found in
the field, is commonly used to demonstrate the
effectiveness of accessories under controlled and
accelerated conditions. The only published industry test
specification for aeolian vibration testing is for vibration
testing of Optical Ground Wire (OPGW). This
specification is IEEE 1138 and was adopted for the testing
of the 3M Composite Conductor.
Figure 19: Aeolian Vibration Test Arrangement
Using a vibration shaker (Figure 19), a 20m sub-span of for Suspension Assembly
795 kcmil Composite Conductor was tensioned to 25%
RBS using a beam/weight basket, and maintained at a
vibration frequency of 29 hertz, and an anti-node
amplitude of 0.37” peak-to-peak, (one-third of conductor High Voltage Corona (RIV)
diameter), for a period of 100 million cycles. Visual Testing was conducted to determine radio influenced
observations were made twice daily of the conductor and voltage (RIV) noise on a suspension assembly. The ends
the Suspension Assembly (5° turning angle) during the test of the helical rods had a higher quality “parrot-bill end”
period. At the completion of the test period the finish for use with a single conductor. No noise was
Suspension Assembly was removed and carefully detected up to 289 kV (phase-phase) for a single
inspected for wear or other damage. The section of the conductor. For a twin bundle test, the more typical “ball-
conductor at the Support Assembly was cut out of the span end” rods were used and no noise was detected up to
and dissected to determine if any wear or damage had 510kV.
occurred to the Al-Zr outer strand, the aluminum tape or to
the composite core. After 100 million cycles of severe
aeolian vibration activity there was no wear or damage
observed on the components of the Suspension Assembly,
nor on any of the conductor constituents.
1706 DAMPER
ON 795M 26/19 ACCR
80.00
70.00
60.00
EFFICIENCY (%)
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
10.59
11.21
11.85
12.48
13.12
13.75
14.38
15.01
2.28
2.86
3.43
4.01
4.59
5.17
5.75
6.35
6.94
7.52
8.13
8.75
9.34
9.98
Figure 22: Efficiency vs. wind-speed showing performance of the 1706-10 damper on a 795-kcmil
3M Composite Conductor
Sheave Test
To verify the suitability of using a 28” diameter
block for installation of 795-kcmil 3M Brand
Composite Conductor, a simple sheave test was
performed. A 100 ft (30 m) length of conductor
was strung through a 28” diameter sheave with a
contact angle of 120° (Figure 23). The conductor
was tensioned to 15% RBS (4670 lbs), and pulled
through the block for a length of 30 ft (9 m). From
this section, a tensile test sample was subsequently Figure 23: 795-kcmil 3M Composite Conductor passing over a 28 inch
prepared, to measure the residual strength. A 10 ft block during the sheave test
(3 m) long test sample broke at 31,480 lbs (101% RBS),
suggesting no damage from the block and that a 28”
diameter block would be
suitable for installation.
Block Diameter Residual Strength Safety Factor at Safety Factor at
Similar experiments (ins) (%RBS) 2000 lbs tension 5000 lbs tension
performed using smaller
28 101 2 1.8
block diameters are shown
22 97 1.5 1.4
in Table 9. This shows
14 100 1.05 1
that the residual tensile
strength remains Table 9. Decreasing the block diameter does not reduce the residual tensile strength but
unaffected after passing does reduce the available safety factor.
over a small diameter
block. However the safety factor for using smaller blocks
quickly reduces until at a 14” diameter there is no safety
margin. The conductor is stressed to the breaking point
under combined bending over a 14” block and 5000 lbs of
tension.
Installation
ACSR ACCR
Equipment
Stringing Blocks Yes Yes (28”)
Bull Wheel Yes Yes (36”)
Drum Puller Yes Yes Figure 24: A 36 inch bull wheel with reel stand (left) and
standard drum puller (right), used to install 3M Composite
Sock Splice Yes Yes Conductor
Conductor Grips Any DG-Grips were at least 36 inches (91 cm) (Figure 24).
Cable Spools Yes Yes (40” Drum)
During pulling through blocks, a swivel should be used to
Cable Cutter Yes Yes minimize twisting of the conductor. A sock splice, also
known as a basket grip, Kellem grip, or wire mesh, can be
Reel Stands Yes Yes
used to pull composite conductors (Figure 25). An
Grounding Clamps Yes Yes example of a sock splice can be found in the
GREENLEE® product catalog. A running ground was
Running Ground Yes Yes used with a rotation marker, although very little rotation
(one revolution per 100 ft) was observed.
Table 10: Comparison of installation equipment needs
between ACSR and the 3M Composite Conductor
(ACCR)
Installation
ACSR ACCR
Procedure
Cable Stringing Tension / Tension
Slack
Sag Tensioning Any Line of sight, Figure 25: A sock splice with swivel used to pull 3M
Composite Conductor in behind ACSR (left) and a 28 inch
Dynometer stringing blocs (right), used to install 3M Composite
Dead Ending Any Use DG-Grip with Conductor
chain hoists
Clipping Any Any
Stringing Block (Sheaves)
Table 11: Comparison of installation procedures
between ACSR and the 3M Composite Conductor According to IEEE Std. 524, as sheave diameters are
(ACCR) increased, several advantages are gained. First, the radius
of bending of the conductor is increased, so the amount of
The installation of 795-kcmil 3M Brand Composite strain in the wires is reduced. Second, the bearing
Conductor at Fargo, North Dakota on the 230-kV network pressures between conductor strand layers are reduced,
of WAPA provides an excellent study of the required thus reducing potential conductor internal strand damage.
installation practices for this type of conductor. As seen in (This is commonly known as strand notching). Lined
the Tables above, the major departure from ACSR blocks are recommended for use with composite
installation revolves around the care of bend radii. conductors. The recommended diameter for the 795-kcmil
Bending of the composite conductor must be carefully 3M Composite Conductor is 28 inches (Figure 25). Also,
monitored during installation to avoid damage to the for the 3M Composite Conductor as well as AAC and
50%
conductor grip and can then still be re-used as a permanent
40%
0 lbs tension dead-end. Final sag is set using dynameters.
30% 1000 lbs tension
2000 lbs tension
Increasing Tension
20% 5000 lbs tension
10000 lbs tension
10%
0%
10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00
Hardware Installation
After pulling in over the blocks, dead-ends, suspension
assemblies and mid-span splices were installed. For this
particular installation, a combination of hardware types
was used, namely compression dead-ends and splices from
Alcoa-Fujikura and helical–rod dead-ends and splices from
Preformed Line Products. All the suspension assemblies
were of the helical rod type, marketed under the trademark
THERMOLIGNTM, from Preformed Line Products (Figure
27).
Figure 28 : Helical-rod DG-Grip (top) and dead-end
assemblies (bottom) may be used as a conductor grip
Table of Properties
Property Summary
Construction (for 26/19) 26 wires of temperature resistant Al-Zr alloy, 19 wires of aluminum matrix composite
Tensile Strength Conductor meets the rated breaking strength.
Stress-Strain curves Design coefficients derived
Aeolian Vibration Excellent resistance. No damage
Electrical Resistance Meets prediction.
Axial Impact Resistance Excellent. Exceeds RBS under shock loads. Helical rod dead-end supports load.
Torsional Ductility High ductility. Aluminum strands fail before core > 88 degrees/ft (289 degrees/m)
Crush Strength Meets IEEE 1138 requirement – no damage, full strength retention
Short-circuit response Runs cooler than equivalent ACSR conductor. Good Performance
Lightning Resistance Damage levels equivalent to ACSR
Terminations & Joints Alcoa-Fujikura compression style, and helical-rod assemblies from PLP. Hardware
runs much cooler than conductor at high temperature, excellent mechanical
properties
Suspension Assemblies Helical-rod assemblies from PLP. Runs cool at high conductor temperatures,
excellent mechanical properties.
Galloping Excellent resistance. No damage
Dampers Alcoa-Fujikura style. Use dampers at all times.
Stringing Blocks Important to oversize blocks-28 inch (71cm) diameter. Full strength retention after
sheave test.
Installation Guidelines Follow IEEE 524. Only use tension method, large blocks, swivels, sock splice, and
only use preformed conductor DG-grips to tension. Avoid tight radius requirements.
Accessories
A summary of accessories and their suppliers is shown in the following table.
Call us:
Write to us:
Fax: 651-736-0431
LIMITATION OF REMEDIES AND LIABILITY: If the 3M product is proved to be defective, THE EXCLUSIVE
REMEDY, AT 3M’S OPTION, SHALL BE TO REFUND THE PURCHASE PRICE OF OR REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE
3M PRODUCT. 3M shall not otherwise be liable for any injury, losses or damages, whether direct, indirect, special,
incidental, or consequential, regardless of the legal or equitable theory asserted, including, without limitation, tort, contract,
negligence, warranty, or strict liability.
April 2003, V1.1 22 Copyright © 2002, 2003, 3M. All rights reserved.