Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

Carlucci's spellcheck

TrineDay surprised me Friday with an advance copy of the second volume of Peter
Levenda's Sinister Forces, so I'm afraid I haven't had time for much more than having my
mind blown.

I found Book One: "The Nine" a little halting in parts as Levenda began mapping his
project, but Book Two: "A Warm Gun" finds him at full-stride, and there's some
wonderfully compelling writing here about the occult/intelligence nexus of subjects such
as the Manson Family, the People's Temple and Mark David Chapman. (And "the Nine"
are back.) It's an exhilarating trip over some rarely-viewed Americana.

Just one little for instance.

In a post last June regarding the Symbionese Liberation Army


(http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/06/working-class-hero-is-something-to-
be.html) I referred to a letter that then-Deputy Director of the CIA Frank Carlucci
(later Director, and later still the Chairman of the Carlyle Group) had written
Congressman Leo Ryan in response to Ryan's inquiries concerning the question of
whether Donald DeFreeze - "Cinque" - had been subjected to mind control
experiments while incarcerated at Vacaville State Prison.

Levenda reproduces Carlucci's letter to Ryan, dated "18 Oct 1978":

Dear Mr Ryan:

Thank you for your letter of 27 September to Admiral Turner requesting confirmation or
denial of the fact of CIA experiments using prisoners at the California medical facility at
Vacaville.

It is true that CIA sponsored testing, using volunteer inmates, was conducted at that
facility. The project was completed in 1968....

You letter referred to Donald DeFreese [sic], known as CINQUE, and Clifford Jefferson,
both of whom were inmates at Vacaville. In so far as our records reflect the names of the
participants, there is nothing to indicate that either was in any way involved in the
project.
Exactly one month after receiving Carlucci's non-denial denial, Ryan was dead on
the tarmac in Guyana while investigating another mad experiment in mind control, the
People's Temple.

I like how Levenda dismantles Carlucci's carefully constructed obfuscation, starting with
the misspelling of DeFreeze's name:

[A]s any lawyer knows [misspelling] is a way to cover one's ass in the event that the
denial is proved false. It means that there was no one at the facility being tested who
bore the name "Donald DeFreese." The CIA has used this tactic before. Yet, let us allow
that it was an honest mistake, a typographical error by a typist. Then there is the
question of "our records."

In the first place, the key MK-ULTRA records, of which the Vacaville experiments would
have been a part, were all destroyed in 1973 (except for four boxes of accounting and
bookkeeping records.) So, the CIA had no records of it all. In the second place, the letter
is very careful to hedge even further: "In so far as our records reflect the names of the
participants." Very clever, considering that in all likelihood no records existed and,
anyway, the name of DeFreeze was misspelled.

Then there is the statement by future-CIA Director Carlucci that the project which had
drawn Congressman Ryan's scrutiny "was completed in 1968." DeFreeze did not become
an inmate at Vacaville until 1969. Thus, we are left with the distinct impression that the
CIA had nothing to do with DeFreeze. But from 1970 on, DeFreeze was in twice-weekly
contact with Colston Westbrook, former intelligence officer under AID cover,
psychological warfare officer, and Vietnam veteran, who created and ran the Black
Cultural Association at the facility. By running an operation at the prison at arm's
length, the CIA had what is known as "plausible deniability." When DeFreeze was
being sought by police during the SLA fiasco, he repeatedly warned that Westbrook
was a CIA officer, but his warnings were taken as the ramblings of a deranged
Communist and black revolutionary, and few paid his charges any attention.

"Mysterious synchronicities" is how author Dick Russell describes the subject of


Levenda's work, and it's apt. Most of the mysteries, naturally enough for a study of evil,
are quite horrible. And when horrible things fit together, and make eminent sense, I can't
help but think of Charles Fort's remark: "If there is a universal mind, must it be sane?"
Maybe not, but that shouldn't stop us. And Levenda, commendably, knows how to keep
his head in the madhouse.

Source: http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/11/carluccis-spellcheck.html