The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.

com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

USA vs me
Personal cost of legal memory lost

The Way Home – v2

Posted on January 27, 2011 by admin

This video is the second version of probably the most important political information most Americans will ever
hear. It clearly describes America’s problem, how we got here, and how to fix it. The solution isn’t as complicated
as you might think, but it is a big deal.

If you agree…

Please sign up for our newsletter And Donate to the cause!

Your Email Click to Donate

Donors will receive preferential consideration on all matters
Subscribe me! related to the case.

Newsletter Subscribers… The video below will not show or play from your email. Please click to the article, to play
the media.

Windows Media Version (download)

PDF Transcript of Version-2

This entry was posted in Call to Action. Bookmark the permalink.

1 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM
The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

15 Responses to The Way Home – v2

Susan says:
March 20, 2011 at 8:10 pm

It is not the 14th Amendment that does the damage. It is the Civil Rights Act that divides the states into military districts
Reconstructed with all new constitutions under Roman Civil Law/ International Law subject to the Acts of Congress under
martial law rule. It is under “emergency powers” that the breach of seperation of powers occured in 1933 at Title Iwherein
Congress “pre-approved” everything heretofore and hereafter done by the President and the Secretary of Treasury. How else
do you think the “gov’t” is able to effect the overthrow of the states? By substituting the theory of Law of thomas Hobbs for
the original theory of Law of John Locke, the “public servants” become the “rulers”.
Reply

Tony Lords says:

March 20, 2011 at 1:35 am

Dear Ed,
David Miller from Wisconsin (I believe) produced law seminars in the late 80′s educated many lawyers and para legals in the
critical methods of drafting successful Title 42 lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court. His five hour seminars have clarified many
of the errors commonly found in lawsuits that cause them to be rejected from being heard. I recommend that you become
acquainted with his full proof material before submitting your case before the court. With kind regards, Tony2u.
Reply

Ed says:
February 8, 2011 at 6:45 pm

Richard,
You can click through to the contact page to email me. Many of you make correct statements. But this is introductory info and
the point is that you have changed your status into a federal domiciliary holding an office through a franchise by election to
hold and use federal property.
As far as the gentleman who has paid SS for 30-40 years and won’t abandon it now, I offer two comments; first, do you really
expect it to be there in the near future? The US is bankrupt again and is printing money as fast as they can to keep the checks
flowing. The rats are fleeing the Titanic.
Second, if the money was collected through fraud, you are entitled to get it back trebled, because it was intentional fraud,
there is also unjust enrichment there. But that is down the road.
Again the point is that there is no remedy with your state for not supplying an SSN to renew a license because the states
receive federal money and have become other than the protectors of rights they were created to be.
For those of you who are participating on this site, stay tuned, we have all the underlying research. I am beyond splitting
hairs and want all 300 million of us to be able to be a state Citizen again with all rights protected, including the most
important, the right to property.
There is much about this suit we cannot go into right now, we first must introduce the concepts to a wide segment of the US
population who know something is wrong but don’t know what it is. Help us do that by spreading the word far and wide. The
above presentation will become a curriculum whereby all Americans can once again understand what it means to live in a
constitutional republic where the People are the progenitor of the law and all rights are protected.
We hope to make this the first peaceful return to foundational principles in the history of man, otherwise the other option is
not pretty.
Thanks

Ed

2 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM
The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

Reply

Jim Vix says:

February 8, 2011 at 4:23 am

As I was watching the video I was glad to see that someone had taken the time to put something like this together. I have not
gone through the whole thing at this point, but I had a question. I got to the part about residents where you seem to quote the
law of nations. The quote is wrong it does not say “resident” it says “inhabitant” and it is on page 101. Where did you find that
it meant resident? I am also hoping that you go back to Downs v Bidwell and have the quote about “Two National
governments”.

Thanks
Reply

Rod says:
February 6, 2011 at 1:26 am

In open court, attorneys routinely object to questions that call for a legal conclusion.

Tax forms routinely call for legal conclusions.

Why not object?

Reply

Rod says:
February 6, 2011 at 1:25 am

The state (the one that claims the land I live on) has denied me a driver license renewal for lack of a SSN.

You say they don’t have the authority to do that.

What do I do about it?

(The flunky said there is no appeal.)

Reply

Steve says:
February 6, 2011 at 1:16 pm

In truth, if you believe the information on this website, then you can understand why a person without a SSN would
not be allowed to get a DL. Such a man or woman is a Citizen with rights, including the right to travel by whatever
means and conveyance they choose. A right cannot be licensed.
Reply

KENNETH HATHAWAY says:

February 5, 2011 at 10:24 pm

ONE QUESTION WAS NOT ANSWERED, FOR THOSE THAT HAVE PAID INTO SOCIAL SECURITY AND HAVE NOT YET
OR HAVE RECENTLY RETIRED HOW DO THEY GET THEIR MONEY BACK IF THEY REFUSE THEIR SOCIAL
SECURITY STATUS??? IF I PAID INTO SOCIAL SECURITY FOR 30 OR 40 YEARS I SURE AS HELL WILL NOT GIVE

3 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM
The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

THAT MONEY TO THE GOVERNMENT AND REFUSE TO CARRY A SOCIAL SECURITY CARD…THIS WOULD HAVE TO
START WITH ANEW GENERATION AND THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW GOOD IT WAS 75 YEARS AGO WHEN THERE
WAS NO TAXES PAID AND EVERY ONE TOOK CARE OF THEM SELVES.. IF SOME ONE NEEDED HELP FRIENDS OR
CHURCHES HELPED THEM… NO SUCH THING AS WELFARE…
Reply

Richard Lowe says:

February 4, 2011 at 11:19 am

Please contact me regarding this presentation. I have information that will greatly help this endeavor. There were two areas
that need some mentioning/correcting.

By electing the “U.S. Citizen” appellation in certain administrative mechanisms published by an “Act of Congress,” it is your
CIVIL STATUS that is changed, not your POLITICAL STATUS. Citizenship in terms of NATIONALITY commutes one’s
POLITICAL STATUS, whereas citizenship in terms of DOMICILE commutes one’s CIVIL STATUS. See U.S. vs. Wong Kim
Ark, 169 US 649 (1898). It is absolutely imperative to get this correct with the SCOTUS filing.

Secondly, the remedy that you are seeking is available through a “Nonresident alien” declaration for tax purposes. Tax status
is a civil status, not a political status — because, as you correctly point out it is based on domicile, not nationality.

14th Amendment constitutional United States citizenship is the equivalent to statutory Nationality. 14th Amendment
citizenship is not bad, but it is a mechanism to encapsulate a Union state Citizen and a statutory Federal “citizen” into one
POLITICAL STATUS so that the CIVIL STATUS issue can be blurred.

Please contact me with an email address so I can send you some graphical information that I believe will be of critical
importance moving forward. I have this information presented in ‘picture form’ which transmits the concepts quickly and
easily. Consequently, it makes writing over these matters much easier.

Thank you for the great presentation. I have forwarded it to over 300 people.
Reply

Chico Rhasiatry says:

February 6, 2011 at 1:09 pm

Richard, would you be so kind as to send me this information. It is obvious to me that most of the population in
North American have no clue. I would like to review your information and try to use it in my effort to free people. A
visual representation could be most valuable.
Reply

Art Patten says:

February 7, 2011 at 8:50 am

Mr. Lowe the following statement you made appears to be a contradiction on its face.
1. “14th Amendment constitutional United States citizenship is the equivalent to statutory Nationality. 14th
Amendment citizenship is not bad, but it is a mechanism to encapsulate a Union state Citizen and a statutory Federal
“citizen” into one POLITICAL STATUS so that the CIVIL STATUS issue can be blurred.”

If I might point out Sir, any law, i.e. “Statue,” that has the inherit intent, to obfuscate, trick, deceive cloud,
circumvent, or destroy, foundational principles in law, is indeed, in you own words, a “bad” thing.
The 14th amendment is void ab initio for many reasons. One, Congress had no organic mechanism in law, or the
authority to place into the body of constitutional law, a statutory scheme, which created a new political status, i.e. a
National or Federal citizen, then mandating, this status, be applied as a default parameter to all the “Citizens” of the

4 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM
The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

newly created Federalized States. These “states” were then divested of all soveringmity and autonomy, becoming
mere insular territorial processions of the U.S, under the aberrational 14th amendment.
Territorial States under the 14th have no lawful standing to dispute the national debt. Confederate states, were then
compelled by threat of force and coercion, into the rubber stamp ratification of the 14th, States,then being converted
into Article 4 subjects of the U.S. government, under the plenary powers of a den of thieves, masquerading as
Congress.

The 14th amendment, teleologically speaking, is at the root of the demise of the republic, it was well thought out
contrived and crafted, as in satanically crafted, as the modus operandi, needed to accomplish the nefarious goals of
the Bankster.s and the British.
The never ratified 14th amendment was drafted by BAR ASS agents, working for the railroads, who then went on to
form municipalities, subsequentally morphing, into the defacto, corporate, administrative communist government
we have today, operating under Roman Praetorian Civil law, which is the foundation of all Federal Law, and which
again, only pertains territorially to D.C. and possessions of the U.S.

I would be careful with the term CIVIL Status. CIVIL as in CIVIL rights is something government grants and confers.
As Mr. Wahler has so adroitly stated, it is not what you put into a SCOTUS action, it is what you do not put in, that
will win the case. Since the 1988 “Super Sessions” of SCOTUS, they have been very adamant, that they are under no
legal duty, to declare the law.

Framing a SCOTUS action, is tantamount to making a rocket fuel mixture, too lean and there will be no force and
effect, too rich, by putting excessive legal issues, off point, and you will give them a way out of rendering the decision
desired.

Mr. Whaler’s case is the most important case SCOTUS will ever hear, because, if the Supreme refuses to uphold, Stare
decisis rulings they have made in the “Switch in Time “ and other cases, then we will have a clear cut determination,
as what means will have to be taken, in order to restore the rule of law and the republic.

Obstinate, sanctimonious Patriots, need to put aside all their convoluted hog wash , snake oil remedies and stop
hocking their “for profit” wares and get behind Mr. Whaler’s case. Mr. Whaler is asking the genie the correct
question, at the right time. All other non-sense needs to be placed on hold, and for once, we need collective unity and
joinder. I am proud of Ed and others need to be proud of him also, he has methodically cut to the chase.
.
Reply

Richard Lowe says:

February 20, 2011 at 8:27 pm

First off, the Supreme Court has ruled on all of this. They will NEVER hear this case — it’s all been settled.
Mr. Wahler himself pointed out the fact that the Supreme Court will not rule on the constitutionality of any
provision of law whereby a voluntary consent mechanism is activated. The remedy that every American
desires is there. It is not the government’s fault that 99% of the country believes they are a statutory “U.S.
Citizen” for the purposes of the Social Security Act or the Federal Income Tax. He who consents cannot
receive an injury.

Secondly, you have presumed that the purpose of the 14th Amendment was to deceive. I do not believe this to
be the case, but was a rather “convenient” by-product of the legislation. Up until the formation of the
European Union, there was not one political body on the face of the planet that had the organizational
structure of the U.S.A. The Union states preceded the Federal government, and the Federal government
preceded Federal territory. There was NO provision to encapsulate the states, the government, and its
possessions into a body-politic commensurate with other nations across the globe. The 14th Amendment,
among other things, did this. Conveniently, for the Feds, the People allowed themselves to be duped (despite
numerous warnings by the Founders), and bought the whole thing hook, line, and sinker.

5 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM
The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

You can complain all you want that the government tried to deceive you, and that it’s all void nunc pro tunc,
ab initio, and any other latin term you want to use. It’s all wishful thinking . . . and these types of arguments
are tired, and the purveyors have all been convicted. Stop it!!!

No . . . the people that need to be tried are the customer service reps at banks, HR personnel at corporations,
and folks at the DMV. The government has provided everyone with the remedy for there naively volunteered
surrender of rights. The SCOTUS has ruled on ALL OF THIS, and they will not hear it.

Finally, if Mr. Wahler files with the SCOTUS and presents a nonsensical position that “electing” a “U.S.
Citizen” status on a Social Security Application somehow alters his POLITICAL STATUS, the Supremes will
laugh as they wad up the petition and make “3-pointers” with it in the trash can. The only thing which will
alter your political status is expatriation. See Title 8 for more on that. Tax status is a civil status, not a
political status. Civil status is based on domicile, not nationality.

The remedy is already there. Why file something with the High Court that will with 100% certainty NOT be
heard!!!

Get back with me and call me a liar later — they won’t hear it!
Reply

edwahler says:
February 21, 2011 at 7:49 pm

Mr. Lowe,
The Supreme Court has ruled on all of this. That is the point, the law and precedent is not being
followed. The SSN is supposed to be voluntary. The “system” which includes “customer service reps
at banks, HR personnel at corporations, and folks at the DMV” as well as the IRS agent, and many
others are not taught the law and the limits of their authority. Can some of us avail ourselves of the
remedy, yes; should we have to spend years trying to achieve it, certainly not.
There is a conflict between the law as written and the way it is enforced. That conflict has brought us
to the brink of financial, legal, moral, governmental Armageddon.
If you are happy with the status quo, God bless you. I am not. I want the republic I was promised. I
want the states to protect individual rights again and not be puppets for the feds. We fully understand
better than the vast majority of people, including attorneys, how we got here.
The Supreme Court may try to duck this, we will be prepared for that. The states and the Fed gov will
scream bloody murder. That is the point. We are a land of the rule of law or we aren’t. The Supremes
must make a conscious and deliberate choice. We want the nation watching the decision process.

So please follow along and see if the SCOTUS shoots 3 pointers with our suit. and if we win, you to
will benefit and so will your progeny. No thanks necessary.

Ed
Reply

Henry Addams says:

January 28, 2011 at 11:13 pm

Is .wmv format available of the new version?

Reply

admin says:
January 31, 2011 at 6:26 pm

6 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM
The Way Home – v2 | USA vs me http://usofavus.com/2011/01/27/the-way-home-v2/

Yes. Thank you for the reminder. It is on the wmv link. About 150Mb.
Reply

USA vs me
Proudly powered by WordPress.

7 of 7 4/29/11 8:22 PM