Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
One plus one makes three: this equation is the special alchemy of a merger or an acquisition.
The key principle behind buying a company is to create shareholder value over and above that of
the sum of the two companies. Two companies together are more valuable than two separate
companies - at least, that's the reasoning behind M&A.
This rationale is particularly alluring to companies when times are tough. Strong
companies will act to buy other companies to create a more competitive, cost-efficient
company. The companies will come together hoping to gain a greater market share or to
achieve greater efficiency. Because of these potential benefits, target companies will
often agree to be purchased when they know they cannot survive alone.
Although they are often uttered in the same breath and used as though they were
synonymous, the terms merger and acquisition mean slightly different things.
When one company takes over another and clearly established itself as the new
owner, the purchase is called an acquisition. From a legal point of view, the target
company ceases to exist, the buyer "swallows" the business and the buyer's stock
continues to be traded.
In the pure sense of the term, a merger happens when two firms, often of about the
same size, agree to go forward as a single new company rather than remain separately
owned and operated. This kind of action is more precisely referred to as a "merger of
equals." Both companies' stocks are surrendered and new company stock is issued in its
place. For example, both Daimler-Benz and Chrysler ceased to exist when the two firms
merged, and a new company, DaimlerChrysler, was created.
In practice, however, actual mergers of equals don't happen very often. Usually, one
company will buy another and, as part of the deal's terms, simply allow the acquired firm
to proclaim that the action is a merger of equals, even if it's technically an acquisition.
Being bought out often carries negative connotations, therefore, by describing the deal as
a merger, deal makers and top managers try to make the takeover more palatable.
A purchase deal will also be called a merger when both CEOs agree that joining
together is in the best interest of both of their companies. But when the deal is unfriendly
- that is, when the target company does not want to be purchased - it is always regarded
as an acquisition.
Synergy
Synergy is the magic force that allows for enhanced cost efficiencies of the new
business. Synergy takes the form of revenue enhancement and cost savings. By merging,
the companies hope to benefit from the following:
• Staff reductions - As every employee knows, mergers tend to mean job losses.
Consider all the money saved from reducing the number of staff members from
accounting, marketing and other departments. Job cuts will also include the
former CEO, who typically leaves with a compensation package.
• Economies of scale - Yes, size matters. Whether it's purchasing stationery or a
new corporate IT system, a bigger company placing the orders can save more on
costs. Mergers also translate into improved purchasing power to buy equipment or
office supplies - when placing larger orders, companies have a greater ability to
negotiate prices with their suppliers.
• Acquiring new technology - To stay competitive, companies need to stay on top
of technological developments and their business applications. By buying a
smaller company with unique technologies, a large company can maintain or
develop a competitive edge.
• Improved market reach and industry visibility - Companies buy companies to
reach new markets and grow revenues and earnings. A merge may expand two
companies' marketing and distribution, giving them new sales opportunities. A
merger can also improve a company's standing in the investment community:
bigger firms often have an easier time raising capital than smaller ones.
That said, achieving synergy is easier said than done - it is not automatically realized
once two companies merge. Sure, there ought to be economies of scale when two
businesses are combined, but sometimes a merger does just the opposite. In many cases,
one and one add up to less than two.
Sadly, synergy opportunities may exist only in the minds of the corporate leaders and
the deal makers. Where there is no value to be created, the CEO and investment bankers -
who have much to gain from a successful M&A deal - will try to create an image of
enhanced value. The market, however, eventually sees through this and penalizes the
company by assigning it a discounted share price. We'll talk more about why M&A may
fail in a later section of this tutorial.
Varieties of Mergers
From the perspective of business structures, there is a whole host of different mergers.
Here are a few types, distinguished by the relationship between the two companies that
are merging:
• Horizontal merger - Two companies that are in direct competition and share the
same product lines and markets.
• Vertical merger - A customer and company or a supplier and company. Think of a
cone supplier merging with an ice cream maker.
• Market-extension merger - Two companies that sell the same products in different
markets.
• Product-extension merger - Two companies selling different but related products
in the same market.
• Conglomeration - Two companies that have no common business areas.
There are two types of mergers that are distinguished by how the merger is
financed. Each has certain implications for the companies involved and for
investors:
o Purchase Mergers - As the name suggests, this kind of merger occurs
when one company purchases another. The purchase is made with cash or
through the issue of some kind of debt instrument; the sale is taxable.
What is a stock-for-stock merger and how does this corporate action affect existing
shareholders?
First, let's be clear about what we mean by a stock-for-stock merger. When a merger or
acquisition is conducted, there are various ways the acquiring company can pay for the
assets it will receive. The acquirer can pay cash outright for all the equity shares of the
target company, paying each shareholder a specified amount for each share. Or, it can
provide its own shares to the target company's shareholders according to a specified
conversion ratio (i.e. for each share of the target company owned by a shareholder, the
shareholder will receive X number of shares of the acquiring company). Acquisitions can
be made with a mixture of cash and stock, or with all stock compensation, which is called
a "stock-for-stock" merger. (To learn more, see What does the term "stock-for-stock"
mean?)
When the merger is stock-for-stock, the acquiring company simply proposes to the target
firm a payment of a certain number of its equity shares in exchange for all of the target
company's shares. Provided the target company accepts the offer (which includes a
specified conversion ratio), the acquiring company essentially issues certificates to the
target firm's shareholders, entitling them to trade in their current shares for rights to
acquire a pro rata number of the acquiring firm's shares. The acquiring firm basically
issues new shares (adding to its total number of shares outstanding) to provide shares for
all the target firm's shares that are being converted.
This action, of course, causes the dilution of the current shareholders' equity, since there
are now more total shares outstanding for the same company. However, at the same time,
the acquiring company obtains all of the assets and liabilities of the target firm, thus
approximately neutralizing the effects of the dilution. Should the merger prove beneficial
and provide sufficient synergy, the current shareholders will gain in the long run from the
additional appreciation provided by the assets of the target company.
Terms like "dawn raid", "poison pill", and "shark repellent" might seem like they belong
in James Bond movies, but there's nothing fictional about them - they are part of the
world of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Owning stock in a company means you are
part owner, and as we see more and more sector-wide consolidation, mergers and
acquisitions are the resultant proceedings. So it is important to know what these terms
mean for your holdings.
Mergers, acquisitions and takeovers have been a part of the business world for centuries.
In today's dynamic economic environment, companies are often faced with decisions
concerning these actions - after all, the job of management is to maximize shareholder
value. Through mergers and acquisitions, a company can (at least in theory) develop a
competitive advantage and ultimately increase shareholder value.
There are several ways that two or more companies can combine their efforts. They can
partner on a project, mutually agree to join forces and merge, or one company can
outright acquire another company, taking over all its operations, including its holdings
and debt, and sometimes replacing management with their own representatives. It’s this
last case of dramatic unfriendly takeovers that is the source of much of M&A’s colorful
vocabulary.
Hostile Takeover
This is an unfriendly takeover attempt by a company or raider that is strongly resisted by
the management and the board of directors of the target firm. These types of takeovers
are usually bad news, affecting employee morale at the targeted firm, which can quickly
turn to animosity against the acquiring firm. Grumblings like, “Did you hear they are
axing a few dozen people in our finance department…” can be heard by the water cooler.
While there are examples of hostile takeovers working, they are generally tougher to pull
off than a friendly merger.
Takeovers are announced practically everyday, but announcing them doesn't necessarily
mean everything will go ahead as planned. In many cases the target company does not
want to be taken over. What does this mean for investors? Everything! There are many
strategies that management can use during M&A activity, and almost all of these
strategies are aimed at affecting the value of the target's stock in some way. Let's take a
look at some more popular ways that companies can protect themselves from a predator.
These are all types of what is referred to as "shark repellent".
Golden Parachute
A golden parachute measure discourages an unwanted takeover by offering lucrative
benefits to the current top executives, who may lose their job if their company is taken
over by another firm. Benefits written into the executives’ contracts include items such as
stock options, bonuses, liberal severance pay and so on. Golden parachutes can be worth
millions of dollars and can cost the acquiring firm a lot of money and therefore act as a
strong deterrent to proceeding with their takeover bid.
Investors in a company that are aiming to take over another one must determine whether
the purchase will be beneficial to them. In order to do so, they must ask themselves how
much the company being acquired is really worth.
Naturally, both sides of an M&A deal will have different ideas about the worth of a target
company: its seller will tend to value the company at as high of a price as possible, while
the buyer will try to get the lowest price that he can.
There are, however, many legitimate ways to value companies. The most common
method is to look at comparable companies in an industry, but deal makers employ a
variety of other methods and tools when assessing a target company. Here are just a few
of them:
1. Comparative Ratios - The following are two examples of the many comparative
metrics on which acquiring companies may base their offers:
o Price-Earnings Ratio (P/E Ratio) - With the use of this ratio, an acquiring
company makes an offer that is a multiple of the earnings of the target
company. Looking at the P/E for all the stocks within the same industry
group will give the acquiring company good guidance for what the target's
P/E multiple should be.
o Enterprise-Value-to-Sales Ratio (EV/Sales) - With this ratio, the acquiring
company makes an offer as a multiple of the revenues, again, while being
aware of the price-to-sales ratio of other companies in the industry.
2. Replacement Cost - In a few cases, acquisitions are based on the cost of replacing
the target company. For simplicity's sake, suppose the value of a company is
simply the sum of all its equipment and staffing costs. The acquiring company can
literally order the target to sell at that price, or it will create a competitor for the
same cost. Naturally, it takes a long time to assemble good management, acquire
property and get the right equipment. This method of establishing a price certainly
wouldn't make much sense in a service industry where the key assets - people and
ideas - are hard to value and develop.
3. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) - A key valuation tool in M&A, discounted cash
flow analysis determines a company's current value according to its estimated
future cash flows. Forecasted free cash flows (net income +
depreciation/amortization - capital expenditures - change in working capital) are
discounted to a present value using the company's weighted average costs of
capital (WACC). Admittedly, DCF is tricky to get right, but few tools can rival
this valuation method.
Let's face it, it would be highly unlikely for rational owners to sell if they would benefit
more by not selling. That means buyers will need to pay a premium if they hope to
acquire the company, regardless of what pre-merger valuation tells them. For sellers, that
premium represents their company's future prospects. For buyers, the premium represents
part of the post-merger synergy they expect can be achieved. The following equation
offers a good way to think about synergy and how to determine whether a deal makes
sense. The equation solves for the minimum required synergy:
In other words, the success of a merger is measured by whether the value of the buyer is
enhanced by the action. However, the practical constraints of mergers, which we discuss
in part five, often prevent the expected benefits from being fully achieved. Alas, the
synergy promised by deal makers might just fall short.
• A reasonable purchase price - A premium of, say, 10% above the market price
seems within the bounds of level-headedness. A premium of 50%, on the other
hand, requires synergy of stellar proportions for the deal to make sense. Stay
away from companies that participate in such contests.
• Cash transactions - Companies that pay in cash tend to be more careful when
calculating bids and valuations come closer to target. When stock is used as the
currency for acquisition, discipline can go by the wayside.
• Sensible appetite – An acquiring company should be targeting a company that is
smaller and in businesses that the acquiring company knows intimately. Synergy
is hard to create from companies in disparate business areas. Sadly, companies
have a bad habit of biting off more than they can chew in mergers.
Mergers are awfully hard to get right, so investors should look for acquiring
companies with a healthy grasp of reality.
Working with financial advisors and investment bankers, the acquiring company will
arrive at an overall price that it's willing to pay for its target in cash, shares or both. The
tender offer is then frequently advertised in the business press, stating the offer price and
the deadline by which the shareholders in the target company must accept (or reject) it.
Not surprisingly, highly sought-after target companies that are the object of
several bidders will have greater latitude for negotiation. Furthermore, managers
have more negotiating power if they can show that they are crucial to the merger's
future success.
• Execute a Poison Pill or Some Other Hostile Takeover Defense – A poison pill
scheme can be triggered by a target company when a hostile suitor acquires a
predetermined percentage of company stock. To execute its defense, the target
company grants all shareholders - except the acquiring company - options to buy
additional stock at a dramatic discount. This dilutes the acquiring company's share
and intercepts its control of the company.
• Find a White Knight - As an alternative, the target company's management may
seek out a friendlier potential acquiring company, or white knight. If a white
knight is found, it will offer an equal or higher price for the shares than the hostile
bidder.
Mergers and acquisitions can face scrutiny from regulatory bodies. For example, if the
two biggest long-distance companies in the U.S., AT&T and Sprint, wanted to merge, the
deal would require approval from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The
FCC would probably regard a merger of the two giants as the creation of a monopoly or,
at the very least, a threat to competition in the industry.
If the transaction is made with stock instead of cash, then it's not taxable. There is simply
an exchange of share certificates. The desire to steer clear of the tax man explains why so
many M&A deals are carried out as stock-for-stock transactions.
When a company is purchased with stock, new shares from the acquiring
company's stock are issued directly to the target company's shareholders, or the new
shares are sent to a broker who manages them for target company shareholders. The
shareholders of the target company are only taxed when they sell their new shares.
When the deal is closed, investors usually receive a new stock in their portfolios - the
acquiring company's expanded stock. Sometimes investors will get new stock identifying
a new corporate entity that is created by the M&A deal.
As mergers capture the imagination of many investors and companies, the idea of getting
smaller might seem counterintuitive. But corporate break-ups, or de-mergers, can be very
attractive options for companies and their shareholders.
Advantages
The rationale behind a spinoff, tracking stock or carve-out is that "the parts are greater
than the whole." These corporate restructuring techniques, which involve the separation
of a business unit or subsidiary from the parent, can help a company raise additional
equity funds. A break-up can also boost a company's valuation by providing powerful
incentives to the people who work in the separating unit, and help the parent's
management to focus on core operations.
Most importantly, shareholders get better information about the business unit because it
issues separate financial statements. This is particularly useful when a company's
traditional line of business differs from the separated business unit. With separate
financial disclosure, investors are better equipped to gauge the value of the parent
corporation. The parent company might attract more investors and, ultimately, more
capital.
Also, separating a subsidiary from its parent can reduce internal competition for
corporate funds. For investors, that's great news: it curbs the kind of negative internal
wrangling that can compromise the unity and productivity of a company.
For employees of the new separate entity, there is a publicly traded stock to motivate and
reward them. Stock options in the parent often provide little incentive to subsidiary
managers, especially because their efforts are buried in the firm's overall performance.
Disadvantages
That said, de-merged firms are likely to be substantially smaller than their parents,
possibly making it harder to tap credit markets and costlier finance that may be affordable
only for larger companies. And the smaller size of the firm may mean it has less
representation on major indexes, making it more difficult to attract interest from
institutional investors.
Meanwhile, there are the extra costs that the parts of the business face if separated. When
a firm divides itself into smaller units, it may be losing the synergy that it had as a larger
entity. For instance, the division of expenses such as marketing, administration and
research and development (R&D) into different business units may cause redundant costs
without increasing overall revenues.
Restructuring Methods
There are several restructuring methods: doing an outright sell-off, doing an equity carve-
out, spinning off a unit to existing shareholders or issuing tracking stock. Each has
advantages and disadvantages for companies and investors. All of these deals are quite
complex.
Sell-Offs
A sell-off, also known as a divestiture, is the outright sale of a company subsidiary.
Normally, sell-offs are done because the subsidiary doesn't fit into the parent company's
core strategy. The market may be undervaluing the combined businesses due to a lack of
synergy between the parent and subsidiary. As a result, management and the board decide
that the subsidiary is better off under different ownership.
Besides getting rid of an unwanted subsidiary, sell-offs also raise cash, which can be used
to pay off debt. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, corporate raiders would use debt to
finance acquisitions. Then, after making a purchase they would sell-off its subsidiaries to
raise cash to service the debt. The raiders' method certainly makes sense if the sum of the
parts is greater than the whole. When it isn't, deals are unsuccessful.
Equity Carve-Outs
More and more companies are using equity carve-outs to boost shareholder value. A
parent firm makes a subsidiary public through an initial public offering (IPO) of shares,
amounting to a partial sell-off. A new publicly-listed company is created, but the parent
keeps a controlling stake in the newly traded subsidiary.
A carve-out is a strategic avenue a parent firm may take when one of its subsidiaries is
growing faster and carrying higher valuations than other businesses owned by the parent.
A carve-out generates cash because shares in the subsidiary are sold to the public, but the
issue also unlocks the value of the subsidiary unit and enhances the parent's shareholder
value.
The new legal entity of a carve-out has a separate board, but in most carve-outs, the
parent retains some control. In these cases, some portion of the parent firm's board of
directors may be shared. Since the parent has a controlling stake, meaning both firms
have common shareholders, the connection between the two will likely be strong.
That said, sometimes companies carve-out a subsidiary not because it's doing well, but
because it is a burden. Such an intention won't lead to a successful result, especially if a
carved-out subsidiary is too loaded with debt, or had trouble even when it was a part of
the parent and is lacking an established track record for growing revenues and profits.
Carve-outs can also create unexpected friction between the parent and subsidiary.
Problems can arise as managers of the carved-out company must be accountable to their
public shareholders as well as the owners of the parent company. This can create divided
loyalties.
Spinoffs
A spinoff occurs when a subsidiary becomes an independent entity. The parent firm
distributes shares of the subsidiary to its shareholders through a stock dividend. Since this
transaction is a dividend distribution, no cash is generated. Thus, spinoffs are unlikely to
be used when a firm needs to finance growth or deals. Like the carve-out, the subsidiary
becomes a separate legal entity with a distinct management and board.
Like carve-outs, spinoffs are usually about separating a healthy operation. In most cases,
spinoffs unlock hidden shareholder value. For the parent company, it sharpens
management focus. For the spinoff company, management doesn't have to compete for
the parent's attention and capital. Once they are set free, managers can explore new
opportunities.
Tracking Stock
A tracking stock is a special type of stock issued by a publicly held company to track the
value of one segment of that company. The stock allows the different segments of the
company to be valued differently by investors.
Let's say a slow-growth company trading at a low price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) happens
to have a fast growing business unit. The company might issue a tracking stock so the
market can value the new business separately from the old one and at a significantly
higher P/E rating.
Why would a firm issue a tracking stock rather than spinning-off or carving-out its fast
growth business for shareholders? The company retains control over the subsidiary; the
two businesses can continue to enjoy synergies and share marketing, administrative
support functions, a headquarters and so on. Finally, and most importantly, if the tracking
stock climbs in value, the parent company can use the tracking stock it owns to make
acquisitions.
Still, shareholders need to remember that tracking stocks are class B, meaning they don't
grant shareholders the same voting rights as those of the main stock. Each share of
tracking stock may have only a half or a quarter of a vote. In rare cases, holders of
tracking stock have no vote at all.
Historical trends show that roughly two thirds of big mergers will disappoint on their own
terms, which means they will lose value on the stock market. The motivations that drive
mergers can be flawed and efficiencies from economies of scale may prove elusive. In
many cases, the problems associated with trying to make merged companies work are all
too concrete.
Flawed Intentions
For starters, a booming stock market encourages mergers, which can spell trouble. Deals
done with highly rated stock as currency are easy and cheap, but the strategic thinking
behind them may be easy and cheap too. Also, mergers are often attempt to imitate:
somebody else has done a big merger, which prompts other top executives to follow suit.
A merger may often have more to do with glory-seeking than business strategy. The
executive ego, which is boosted by buying the competition, is a major force in M&A,
especially when combined with the influences from the bankers, lawyers and other
assorted advisers who can earn big fees from clients engaged in mergers. Most CEOs get
to where they are because they want to be the biggest and the best, and many top
executives get a big bonus for merger deals, no matter what happens to the share price
later.
On the other side of the coin, mergers can be driven by generalized fear. Globalization,
the arrival of new technological developments or a fast-changing economic landscape
that makes the outlook uncertain are all factors that can create a strong incentive for
defensive mergers. Sometimes the management team feels they have no choice and must
acquire a rival before being acquired. The idea is that only big players will survive a
more competitive world.
The chances for success are further hampered if the corporate cultures of the companies
are very different. When a company is acquired, the decision is typically based on
product or market synergies, but cultural differences are often ignored. It's a mistake to
assume that personnel issues are easily overcome. For example, employees at a target
company might be accustomed to easy access to top management, flexible work
schedules or even a relaxed dress code. These aspects of a working environment may not
seem significant, but if new management removes them, the result can be resentment and
shrinking productivity.
More insight into the failure of mergers is found in the highly acclaimed study from
McKinsey, a global consultancy. The study concludes that companies often focus too
intently on cutting costs following mergers, while revenues, and ultimately, profits,
suffer. Merging companies can focus on integration and cost-cutting so much that they
neglect day-to-day business, thereby prompting nervous customers to flee. This loss of
revenue momentum is one reason so many mergers fail to create value for shareholders.
But remember, not all mergers fail. Size and global reach can be advantageous, and
strong managers can often squeeze greater efficiency out of badly run rivals.
Nevertheless, the promises made by deal makers demand the careful scrutiny of
investors. The success of mergers depends on how realistic the deal makers are and how
well they can integrate two companies while maintaining day-to-day operations.
What Makes An M&A Deal Work?
Companies buy other companies for a variety of reasons. Whatever reasons drive a
particular deal, mergers and acquistions (M&A) are considered successful when multiple
synergies are realized and when the business combination increases the net cash flow of
the merged business beyond what each entity could have achieved on its own. Here we'll
examine what makes a successful acquisition and take a look at three companies that
have pulled it off.
Business combinations can also provide cost savings, primarily achieved by eliminating
redundant functions, idle capacity and operational inefficiencies. Ideally, for revenue-
and cost-type benefits to materialize, the target company should easily integrate with the
acquiring entity.
Bharti Airtel
Bharti Airtel Limited (NSE: BHARTIARTL, BSE: 532454), commonly known as airtel,
is an Indian telecommunications company that operates in 19 countries across South
Asia, Africa and the Channel Islands. It operates a GSM network in all countries,
providing 2G or 3G services depending upon the country of operation. Airtel is the fifth
largest telecom operator in the world with over 207.8 million subscribers across 19
countries at the end of 2010. It is the largest cellular service provider in India, with over
152.5 million subscribers at the end of 2010. Airtel is the 3rd largest in-country mobile
operator by subscriber base, behind China Mobile and China Unicom..
Airtel also offers fixed line services and broadband services. It offers its telecom services
under the Airtel brand and is headed by Sunil Bharti Mittal. Bharti Airtel is the first
Indian telecom service provider to achieve this Cisco Gold Certification. To earn Gold
Certification, Bharti Airtel had to meet rigorous standards for networking competency,
service, support and customer satisfaction set forth by Cisco. The company also provides
land-line telephone services and broadband Internet access (DSL) in over 96 cities in
India. It also acts as a carrier for national and international long distance communication
services. The company has a submarine cable landing station at Chennai, which connects
the submarine cable connecting Chennai and Singapore.
It is known for being the first mobile phone company in the world to outsource
everything except marketing and sales and finance. Its network (base stations, microwave
links, etc.) are maintained by Ericsson, Nokia Siemens Network and Huawei. Business
support by IBM and transmission towers by another company (Bharti Infratel Ltd. in
India). Ericsson agreed for the first time, to be paid by the minute for installation and
maintenance of their equipment rather than being paid up front. This enabled the
company to provide pan-India phone call rates of Rs. 1/minute (U$0.02/minute). Call
rates have come down much further. During the last financial year [2009-10], Bharti has
roped in a strategic partner Alcatel-Lucent to manage the network infrastructure for the
Telemedia Business.
History
Sunil Bharti Mittal founded the Bharti Group. In 1983, Sunil Mittal was into an
agreement with Germany's Siemens to manufacture the company's push-button telephone
models for the Indian market. In 1986, Sunil Bharti Mittal incorporated Bharti Telecom
Limited (BTL) and his company became the first in India to offer push-button telephones,
establishing the basis of Bharti Enterprises. This first-mover advantage allowed Sunil
Mittal to expand his manufacturing capacity elsewhere in the telecommunications
market. By the early 1990s, Sunil Mittal had also launched the country's first fax
machines and its first cordless telephones. In 1992, Sunil Mittal won a bid to build a
cellular phone network in Delhi. In 1995, Sunil Mittal incorporated the cellular
operations as Bharti Tele-Ventures and launched service in Delhi. In 1996, cellular
service was extended to Himachal Pradesh. In 1999, Bharti Enterprises acquired control
of JT Holdings, and extended cellular operations to Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. In
2000, Bharti acquired control of Skycell Communications, in Chennai. In 2001, the
company acquired control of Spice Cell in Calcutta. Bharti Enterprises went public in
2002, and the company was listed on Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock
Exchange of India. In 2003, the cellular phone operations were rebranded under the
single Airtel brand. In 2004, Bharti acquired control of Hexacom and entered Rajasthan.
In 2005, Bharti extended its network to Andaman and Nicobar.
In 2009, Airtel launched its first international mobile network in Sri Lanka. In 2010,
Airtel began operating in Bangladesh and 16 African countries.
Today, Airtel is the largest cellular service provider in India and fifth largest in the world.
Worldwide Presence
Airtel is the 5th largest mobile operator in the world in terms of subscriber base and has a
commercial presence in 19 countries and the Channel Islands.
Bharti Airtel has about 207.8 million subscribers worldwide - 152.5 million in India,
50.3 million are in Africa, 3.2 million in Bangladesh and 1.8 million in Sri Lanka as of
the end of 2010. The numbers include mobile services subscribers in 19 countries and
Indian Telemedia services and Digital services subscribers.
Rebranding
On 18 November 2010, Airtel rebranded itself in India in the first phase of a global
rebranding strategy. The company unveiled a new logo with 'airtel' written in lower case.
Designed by London-based brand agency, Brand Union, the new logo is the letter 'a' in
lowercase, with 'airtel' written in lowercase under the logo.
On November 23, 2010, Airtel's Africa operations were rebranded to 'airtel'. Sri Lanka
followed on November 28, 2010 and on December 20, 2010, Warid Telecom rebranded
to 'airtel' in Bangladesh.
Sponsorship
On May 9, 2009 Airtel signed a major deal with Manchester United Football Club. As a
result of the deal, Airtel gets the rights to broadcast the matches played by the team to its
customers.
Bharti Airtel signed a five-year deal with ESPN Star Sports to become the title sponsor of
the Champions League Twenty20 cricket tournament. The tournament itself is named
"Airtel Champions League Twenty20."
Signature tune
The signature tune of Airtel is composed by Indian musician A. R. Rahman. The tune
became hugely popular and is the world's most downloaded mobile music with over 150
million downloads. A new version of the song was released on 18 November 2010, as
part of the rebranding of the company. This version too was composed by Rahman
himself
Timeline
1996
1997
1998
• Bharti Telecom and British Telecom formed a 51% : 49% joint venture, "Bharti
BT Internet" for providing Internet services
• First Indian private fixed-line services launched in Indore in the Madhya Pradesh
circle on June 4, 1998 by Bharti Telenet thereby ending fixed-line services
monopoly of Department of Telecom (now BSNL).
1999
2000
2001
2002
• Enters into a 5-year agreement with Escotel (now called Idea Cellular) and ETL
of the Escorts group to contract leased line connectivity for its cellular operations
• Mr. Ravi Akhoury ceases to be Director of Bharti Tele
• DoT grants ILD Telephony License to Bharti Telesonic, subsidiary of the
company
• Signs MoU with Telia AB to buy out their 26% stake in Bharti Mobile
• Ties up with Secondary School Certification (SSC) Board, Hyderabad, where
Bharti will announce SSC results to its customers on their mobile phones
• ICICI Bank ties up with Bharti for pre-paid mobile cards via ATMs
• Bharti forays into Mumbai with offers
• Alpine International Ltd. and ELM International Ltd. acquire shares of Bharti
Tele-Ventures
2003
2004
2005
• Airtel launches video services for its GPRS customers on February 22, 2005
• Airtel unveils new TV ad featuring Sachin Tendulkar and Shah Rukh Khan
• Bharti Tele-Ventures launches telecom network in Andaman & Nicobar
• BTVL unveil fixed line, broadband services
• Bharti inks 5-m deal with Nokia for rural network expansion
• Bharti Tele Ventures Ltd has announced that Airtel, ICICI Bank & VISA have
joined hands to launch mCheq - a revolutionary new service - a credit card on the
mobile phone
• Airtel introduces BlackBerry Connect in India
• Bharti Tele Ventures announces agreement with Vodafone
• Airtel unveils 'free flight' offer
• Bharti Tele-Ventures launches under sea cable system
2006
2007
• Bharti Airtel has come out with a slew of initiatives including buying out
SingTel's 50 per cent stake in joint venture under sea cable company Network i2i
• Bharti Airtel on Feb 11, has been awarded QCI-DL Shah National Award on
Economics of Quality.
• Bharti Airtel Ltd has announces changes in the operational leadership structure
and roles in the Company effective April 01, 2007.
• Bharti Airtel Ltd on April 01, 2007, has announces the reduction in ISD Tariffs
for all its mobile customers in India.
• Nokia Siemens Networks on Jan 3 declared that it has been awarded a multi
million euro contract from Bharti Airtel Ltd for deployment of a single interactive
voice response (IVR) platform across 23 circles. The three-year turnkey contract
comprises designing, planning, systems integration and optimisation services to
raise overall customer experience. The new IVR solution will enable Airtel to
deliver services such as voice SMS, televoting, call management services, caller
ring back tone and voice portal on a faster time-to-market basis and, therefore,
reduce OPEX costs.
• Bharti Airtel Ltd on February 13, 2008 has announced that it has achieved the 60
million mobile, fixed line and broadband customers.
• Bharti Airtel tied up with US-based Apple Inc to bring the popular GSM-based
iPhone in the country.
• Bharti Airtel Ltd has forged a technology alliance with Infosys Technologies Ltd
to launch its Direct-to-Home (DTH) television services. Infosys, through its
digital convergence platform, will offer a suite of products including devices,
application servers and interactive applications for Airtel's DTH services.
2009
• Bharti Airtel signed a five-year managed services deal with Alcatel-Lucent for its
fixed-line and broadband operations.
• Bharti Airtel launched the 'Airtel Advantage' initiative. The initiative is aimed at
offering the added advantage to Airtel customers to be in touch with each other at
an affordable rate of 50 paise per minute, be it a national long distance call (STD)
or a local call.
• In order to create products and services for the small, medium and large
enterprises, Bharti Airtel and Cisco announced a strategic business alliance. The
alliance would combine the strengths of Airtel's network service and Cisco'
Internet Protocol (IP) technologies.
• Airtel and mChek announce milestone of 1 Million users and introduce a broad
range of new mCommerce services.
2010
• On 14, February 2010, Zain Ghana issued a resolution to accept a $10.7 billion
buyout offer from Bharti Airtel Limited (Bharti) to enter into exclusive
discussions until 25 March 2010, regarding the sale of its African unit, Zain
Africa BV.
• Bharti Airtel submitted its bid for 3G spectrum auction which starts from April 9,
2010.
• Bharti Airtel has partnered with US-based software maker VMware Inc. It has
done this in order to focus on the cloud-based managed computer services market.
• On May 18, 2010, Airtel won 3G spectrum in 13 circles: Delhi, Mumbai, Andhra
Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh (West), Rajasthan, West Bengal,
Himachal Pradesh, Bihar, Assam, North East, Jammu & Kashmir for Rs. 12,295
crores.
• Bharti Airtel wins broadband spectrum in four circles: Maharashtra, Karnataka,
Punjab and Kolkata for Rs. 3314.36 crores.
• On 8, June 2010, Bharti Airtel completed a deal to Zain Telecom's businesses in
15 African countries for $10.7 billion.
• On August 11, 2010, Bharti Airtel announced that it would acquire 100% stake in
Telecom Seychelles for US$62 million taking its global presence to 19 countries.
• On 20 September 2010, Bharti Airtel said that it has given contracts to Ericsson
India, Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) and Huawei Technologies to set up
infrastructure for providing 3G services in the country.
• On 18 November, 2010, Bharti Airtel announced a re-branding campaign
wherein, they would be referred as airtel, with a new logo.
• On 20 December 2010, Airtel launched its new identity for Bangladesh
subscribers.
• On 23 December 2010, Airtel opened its first underground terrestrial fibre optic
cable built in alliance with China Telecom.
2011
Airtel has won the ‘Most Preferred Cellular Service Provider Brand’ award at the
CNBC Awaaz Consumer Awards in Mumbai. This is 6th year in a row that airtel has won
the award in this category. This year, the awards were based on an exhaustive consumer
survey done by The Nielsen Company. Over 3,000 consumers, spanning 19 cities and 16
states in India, rated brands across different categories to choose brands which delivered
true value of money
Core Values
Customer Focus
Respect and Care for Individuals
Meeting Commitments
Integrity
Continuous Improvement
Our Differentiators
Centum Learning enjoys sustainable competitive advantages emanating from a powerful vision and an empowered work culture where every individual is
committed to excellence in crafting learning solutions. Few key pillars distinguish us from the rest.
A Bharti Associate Company and a strategic partner to all Bharti Group companies for transforming business outcomes
Strategic partner to leading corporates including several Fortune 500 companies for transforming business outcomes
Over 800 Centum Learning certified Learning and Development Specialists across 19 countries
Enhanced competencies of more than 1, 40,000 employees within the Bharti group itself
Formed Centum Workskills India Limited in association with NSDC to develop globally deployable skilled manpower, empowering millions
of unskilled youth and creating employability
Launched Centum U – Institute of Management and Creative Studies for offering industry oriented degrees in association with world
renowned Universities and Institutes
Enhancing employability quotient of students through 150 Centum Learning Centres in 90 locations by offering higher education
programmes in collaboration with leading universities like University of Delhi and Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)
New Delhi , March 30, 2010 : Bharti Airtel Limited (“Bharti”), Asia’s leading
telecommunications service provider, today announced that it has entered into a legally
binding definitive agreement with Zain Group (“Zain”) to acquire Zain Africa BV based
on an enterprise valuation of USD 10.7 billion.
Under the agreement, Bharti will acquire Zain’s African mobile services operations in 15
countries with a total customer base of over 42 million. Zain is the market leader in ten of
these countries and ranks second in four countries. With this acquisition, Bharti Airtel
will be the world’s fifth largest wireless company with operations across 18 countries.
Bharti group’s global telecom footprint will expand to 21 countries along with the
operations in Seychelles, Jersey, and Guernsey. The company’s network will now cover
over 1.8 billion people - the second largest population coverage among Telcos globally.
Mr. Sunil Bharti Mittal, Chairman and Managing Director, Bharti Airtel said, “This
agreement is a landmark for global telecom industry and game changer for Bharti. More
importantly, this transaction is a pioneering step towards South South cooperation and
strengthening of ties between India and Africa. With this acquisition, Bharti Airtel will be
transformed into a truly global telecom company with operations across 18 countries
fulfilling our vision of building a world-class multinational.
We are excited at the growth opportunities in Africa, the continent of hope and
opportunity. We believe that the strength of our brand and the historical Indian connect
with Africa coupled with our unique business model will allow us to unlock the potential
of these emerging markets. We are committed to partnering with the governments in
these countries in taking affordable telecom services to the remotest geographies and
bridging the digital divide. I would also like to compliment the Zain group for building
world-class operations in Africa and we have enjoyed working with them on this
transaction.”
Mr Mittal further added, "The extremely tight time lines and the enormity of the task
posed a real challenge. Bharti was able to achieve this important milestone through much
hardwork and support from SingTel and the external advisors. Appreciation is in order
for all the team members involved in this transaction."
Mr. Asaad Al Banwan, Chairman, Zain Group said, “Since we acquired Celtel in 2005,
we have grown substantially to become one of Africa’s leading mobile operators, and we
are proud of the contribution Zain Africa has made to the development of
telecommunications across the continent."
He added, “Bharti Airtel has a fantastic track record in running successful operations in
the emerging markets and we are delighted that the African telecom asset that we so
assiduously built is becoming part of such a committed and reputable telecom
powerhouse. We wish Bharti Airtel all the very best for their future success in Africa.”
Zain Africa BV has mobile operations in the following 15 countries - Burkina Faso,
Chad, Congo Brazzaville, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya,
Madagascar, Malawi, Niger, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia. The
total population of these 15 countries stands at over 450 million with telecom penetration
of approximately 32%.
With this acquisition Bharti’s total customer base will increase to around 179 million in
18 countries. Bharti launched mobile services in India in 1995, Sri Lanka in 2009 and
acquired Warid in Bangladesh in January 2010.
Standard Chartered Bank is the Lead Advisor to Bharti on this transaction. Barclays
Capital is the Joint Lead Advisor and SBI Group is the Lead Onshore Advisor. Global
Investment House KSCC is the Regional Advisor to Bharti on this transaction.
ZAIN AFRICA
We began life in 1983 in Kuwait as the region’s first mobile operator, and since the
initiation of our expansion strategy in 2003, we have expanded rapidly.
Today, we are a leading mobile and data services operator with a commercial
footprint in 7 Middle Eastern and African countries with a workforce of 6,000 providing
a comprehensive range of mobile voice and data services to over 37.24 million** active
individual and business customers (December 31, 2010).
On March 14, 2009, Zain in a 50/50 partnership with Al Ajial Investment Fund
Holding acquired 31% of Wana, the third mobile telecom operator in Morocco.
On June 8, 2010, Zain announced that it has now satisfied all required conditions
precedent to closing of the sale of 100% of Zain Africa BV (“Zain Africa”) to Bharti
Airtel Limited (“Bharti”) for US$10.7 billion on an enterprise basis. The 15 countries that
Bharti Airtel acquired from Zain in Africa, were- Burkina Faso, Chad, Democratic
Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Madagascar,
Malawi, Niger, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia.
Listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange, there are no restrictions on Zain shares as the
company’s capital is 100% free float and publicly traded. The largest shareholder is the
Kuwait Investment Authority (24.6%).
In addition to securing the best possible returns for shareholders consistent with a high
standard of corporate governance, Zain considers itself defined by a commitment to
excellence in providing world-class mobile / data services and an ethos of corporate
social responsibility in supporting communities, offering employment and creating
business opportunities wherever it operates.
It is important to Zain that its economic, social and cultural projects have a positive
impact on the people of all the countries in which we operate.
Brand
Zain, formerly MTC, was the first mobile telecommunications company in the Middle
East when it started its operations in Kuwait back in 1983. At the end of 2002, the
company launched its expansion vision, aggressively targeting to achieve a global
position in just 9 years – whereas it had taken several decades for global companies to
achieve this status. From being in one country in 2002, Zain grew to a conglomerate with
commercial operations in 23 countries by third quarter of 2009, making it the world’s 3rd
largest telecom company in terms of geographic footprint.
This expansion was partially achieved through the acquisition of several existing
telecommunications companies in the region - MTC-Vodafone in Kuwait and Bahrain to
Fastlink in Jordan, Mobitel in Sudan, MTC Atheer and Iraqna in Iraq, and Celtel in
Africa - each strongly branded in its own right. Thus, as a fast growing mobile operator
servicing its clients under 7 different brand names have become local icons in their own
right, the company felt the need to group under a single brand that will facilitate its rise
on the global arena.
Name:
A long journey, covering several steps in brand name creation and giving voice to the
company’s own employees, ended up with the selection of Zain as the new brand name.
Zain is simple, memorable and easy to pronounce across the global marketplace. The
name Zain tested extremely well among cross-sections of the potential global audience.
These research results coincided with our internal selection. Zain has the added benefit of
being rich in positive connotations in several languages. For example, in Arabic, Zain
means ‘beautiful, good and wonderful”, in Latin it means ‘dark horse’ (of good breed;
meaning cheval de race). In fact, the name Zain reflects our values and our positioning.
As a company, our vision is to create a successful business model that will go outward
from the Middle East to the rest of the world. Having a name that embodies beauty and
optimism is a move we’re proud of.”
Values:
With the need for a new brand name came the need to consolidate the company values
into a single set shared by all employees. These values are core to the new brand identity.
At the heart of Zain stand 3 core values that constitute the foundations of this brand:
Heart: Live your life with courage and resolve, engage your spirit, touch your emotions,
connect to your soul.
Radiance: Leading the way with imagination and vision, bringing joy, color, and richness
to your life.
Signature:
The Zain brand and its new theme – A wonderful world - capture the energy, inspiration
and diversity of the Group’s customers, employees and other stakeholders. The new
signature logo and its colorful identity reflect the Group’s freshness, boldness and
vitality. It is a perfect expression of the Zain brand and is inspired from a sense of aura –
a distinctive but intangible atmosphere that surrounds a person giving them an air of
mystery – something important to human life echoing growth, progression and diversity.
Besides its distinctive shape, the strength of the Zain logo lies in the fact that it is as
recognizable and liked when used in its fragmented form.
On the technical side, we were bold in choosing colors that were not the usual set of
primary and secondary colors used in most telecoms logos (ie: Red, blue, yellow, green,
etc…). Color is inspirational and evocative. Used effectively, it can create an emotional
language that reflects our character and engages a global audience. Black expresses a
sophisticated and contemporary approach; Purple represents our energy and warmth
while Aqua brings freshness and a cool assurance to the mix. These colors are enhanced
by a set of lively secondary colors that add zest to Zain’s visual signature.
Rebranding:
To launch this new brand, Zain developed a campaign promoting a wonderful world in
which people observe not what they see, but what they look for...
7 Middle Eastern operations were rebranded to Zain throughout 2007 with a series of
first-rate events. 14 African operations followed suit on August 1, 2008 where they
rebranded from Celtel to Zain, an occasion that was celebrated with a series of
spectacular events, attended by over 100,000 people. The rebranding concerts were
attended by some of Africa’s senior diplomats, VIPs, artists and celebrities in all 14
countries who witnessed live speeches and festivities through an hour long live satellite
feed that linked all countries to each other, the most ambitious live satellite linkup the
continent has ever seen. It was the biggest and most successful rebranding Africa has
ever seen, which earned Zain the Best Marketing Campaign of the Year on November
23rd, 2008 at the inaugural AfricaCom Awards in Cape Town, South Africa.
Today, only two years old, Zain has one of the most recognizable and strongest brand
presences, supported by strong promotion and sponsorship programs, across each of the
group’s key markets. According to the 2009 BRANDFINANCE GLOBAL 500, and
independent brand valuation report, Zain’s brand value was estimated at around US$ 2
billion. Additionally, Zain is ranked 28 amongst the top 5 global telecoms operators’
brands according to the Brand Report published by Total Telecom in 2009.
At the forefront of any successful company has to be its own people – at the forefront of
planning, execution and management. In alignment with our “3x3x3” expansion strategy,
our team’s mission is to cement Zain as a leading global mobile operator providing
world-class services to all our customers. This means enchanting our customers and
exceeding their expectations.
We have come a very long way in a very short time from our modest but visionary
beginnings and we believe that any organisation aspiring to such a goal must be built on
strong internal foundations and practices.
At Zain, we pride ourselves on our foundations, on our employees and in the way we
operate, which is in line with the objectives of our corporate strategy and which revolve
around:
Our values
As Zain we become one international family, building on the outstanding progress we
have made over the past five years, and adopting core values that remain constant
irrespective of the different national cultures and identities that we share.
Radiance is about leading the way with imagination and vision, bringing joy, colour, and
richness to our business environment.
Heart represents living our lives with courage and resolve, engaging our spirit and
touching emotions.
Belonging means exactly what it says… being part of the fellowship and community
spirit that knows no territorial boundaries.
Such values are not new to us. I believe we all respect and practice them, and that they
have been integral to our success to date. The difference now is that we have formally
adopted them as business drivers – qualities that we share with our colleagues and
customers, people who are progressive achievers and are dedicated to realising their
goals.
We have worked hard to build these foundations and we are confident our personnel are
inspired by our corporate values, ethics and sense of mission and that this is reflected in
their relations with our customers and shareholders. Quite simply, at Zain we believe that
values, ambition, customer satisfaction and mission accomplishment are inseparable.
Pre merger
Eager on increasing its footprint globally, India’s leading mobile company Bharti
Airtel has made an offer worth $10.7 billion to acquire the African operations of Kuwait-
based Zain.
Bharti Airtel and Zain have agreed to enter into exclusive discussions until March 25
for the acquisition of Zain’s African unit (Zain Africa BV) based on an enterprise value
of $10.7 billion. This potential transaction does not include Zain’s operations in Morocco
and Sudan.
The deal remains subject to due diligence, customary regulatory approvals and
signing of final transaction documentation. There can be no assurance that a transaction
will be consummated. Zain’s board had already given the go-ahead to Bharti Airtel’s bid.
Zain is a leading mobile and data services operator in the Middle East and Africa with
presence in 23 nations and a customer base of over seven-crore. In Africa, it has
operations in 17 countries with over 4.2-crore subscribers.
“We all believe that we would be welcomed in that continent (Africa). I am sure we
will go and speak to the regulator and hopefully get the requisite permissions,” Bharti
Enterprises Managing Director Rajan Mittal told journalists here.
During the exclusive agreement, Bharti would assess the financial parameters and
other related issues, including regulatory norms that are needed to be in place for the
deal.
If the deal goes through, Bharti will be among the top ten operators globally. In
India, Bharti Airtel has over 12.5-crore subscribers.
Bharti Airtel said in a statement. Bharti Airtel has asked its bankers to be ready for
the funds transfer as and when the acquisition takes place.
In March, Bharti Airtel had tied up $8.3 billion from State Bank of India and some
foreign banks to fund the acquisition of Zain telecom's African assets.
On completion, Bharti would be required to pay another $700 million to Zain after a
year, while taking a load of $1.7 billion debt associated with the African assets, the
release added.
The Board is pleased to report that the due diligence process has been completed. Both
Zain and Bharti are now working towards finalizing the definitive agreements which will
address all key terms and findings arising out of the due diligence.
Definitive agreements are expected to be signed soon. Upon signing, the parties will
move towards obtaining any required approvals.
It has been reported that Bharti has already secured the entire financing requirement of
USD 8.3 billion for this transaction.
The sale of ‘Zain Africa BV’ does not include Zain’s operation in Sudan or its investment
in Morocco.
POST
The Public Corporations Accounts Committee (POAC) has stated that the Tanzanian
government has lost $308 million by selling Zain Tanzania to the India-based company
Bharti Airtel last year.
The Tanzania Revenue Authority Commissioner General, Harry Kitillya stated that the
government lost the revenue because assets in Tanzania were not sold since its owner did
not change.
As per Kitillya, the process of selling the company was done in Netherlands, explaining
that it was not easy for them to collect revenue from the country they can not reach. He
told the committee that what was sold was Zain Africa BV and not Zain Tanzania.
The government owns 40% of shares of the company while Bharti Airtel holds 60%.
Kabwe added that this amount has been lost due to bad financial structure. They want the
government to explain the committee about the whereabouts of the amount. They would
have used the funds to construct schools, hospitals and improve social services. The
Income Tax Act of 2004 has some weaknesses which provided loopholes for diversion of
funds.
The committee directed the ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs to bring an
investigation report on the matter within a month with proposals to change or improve the
laws.
The ministry should also establish the amount of income tax that was supposed to be
collected from the new company as well as ensure there is transparency in handling of
shares owned by the government in different companies.
In the largest ever telecom takeover by an Indian firm, Bharti Airtel on Tuesday signed a
deal with Kuwait-based Zain Telecom to buy its African business for $10.7 billion (about
Rs. 48,000 crore).
Announcing the deal, Sunil Mittal said, "This agreement is a landmark for global telecom
industry and game changer for Bharti.
“We are excited at the growth opportunities in Africa, the continent of hope and
opportunity. We believe that the strength of our brand and the historical Indian connect
with Africa coupled with our unique business model will allow us to unlock the potential
of these emerging markets. We are committed to partnering with the governments in
these countries in taking affordable telecom services to the remotest geographies and
bridging the digital divide. I would also like to compliment the Zain group for building
world-class operations in Africa and we have enjoyed working with them on this
transaction," he said.
"The extremely tight time lines and the enormity of the task posed a real challenge.
Bharti was able to achieve this important milestone through much hardwork and support
from SingTel and the external advisors. Appreciation is in order for all the team members
involved in this transaction," he further added.
Asaad Al Banwan, Chairman, Zain Group said, "Since we acquired Celtel in 2005, we
have grown substantially to become one of Africa's leading mobile operators, and we are
proud of the contribution Zain Africa has made to the development of
telecommunications across the continent."
The acquisition, the second largest by an Indian entity after Tatas' Corus deal, would
make Sunil Mittal-led Bharti the world's seventh largest mobile operator with a total
subscriber base of about 179 million. It would have estimated revenues of $13 billion.
With this, Bharti has fulfilled its ambition of entering Africa, where it failed twice in the
last two year's to forge a $23 billion merger deal with South African telecom giant MTN.
Zain has operations in 17 African countries and Bharti has acquired all, but those in
Sudan and Morocco.
The African business would widen Bharti's reach, which was hitherto restricted to Asia
and Indian Ocean region with businesses in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Seychelles.
Of the $10.7 billion enterprise value of Zain, Bharti will be paying $8.3 billion upfront
and $700 million after a year. It would also take over approximately $1.7 billion of Zain's
debts as on December 31, 2009.
Of the $8.3 billion paid to Zain, Bharti has raised the debt from a consortium of foreign
banks and State Bank of India with the lead-arranger and lead-advisor Standard Chartered
Bank committing the highest amount -- $1.3 billion followed by $0.9 billion by Barclays.
The rest of the co-advisors -- ANZ, BNP, Bank of America-Merrill Lynch, Credit
Agricole CIB, DBS, HSBC, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ and Sumitomo Mitsui
Banking Corporation -- have allocated $600 million each.
State Bank of India has agreed up to one billion dollar loan in rupee terms.
"A good move in the right direction. They (Bharti Airtel) have set an example to follow. I
hope that more companies will make acquisitions abroad", the Minister said while
commenting on mega deal.
The government, Khurshid said, has been supportive of such ventures of the Indian
companies.
In one of the biggest deals in the telecom sector, Sunil-Mittal led Bharti Airtel today
acquired the African assets of Zain to become the fifth biggest wireless company in the
world.
http://www.investopedia.com/university/mergers/mergers1.asp
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/stockforstockmergerdetails.asp
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/01/050901.asp
http://www.investopedia.com/university/mergers/mergers3.asp
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/financial-theory/08/ma-deal.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bharti_Airtel
http://www.zain.com/muse/obj/lang.default/portal.view/content/Media%20centre/Press
%20releases/ZainAfricaStatement
http://wirelessfederation.com/news/company/zain-africa-bv/