Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 4

7 blunders that will always

haunt India

No 1: The Kashmir Mess

Major General Mrinal Suman

History is most unforgiving. As historical mistakes cannot be undone, they have complex cascading
effect on a nation's future. Here are seven historical blunders that have changed the course of
independent India's history and cast a dark shadow over its future. These costly mistakes will
continue to haunt India for generations. They have been recounted here in a chronological order
with a view to highlight the inadequacies of India's decision-making apparatus and the leadership's
incompetence to act with vision.
There can be no better example of shooting one's own foot than India's clumsy handling of the
Kashmir issue. It is a saga of naivety, blinkered vision and inept leadership.
Hari Singh was the reigning monarch of the state of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947. He was
vacillating when tribal marauders invaded Kashmir in October 1947, duly backed by the Pakistan
army. Unable to counter them, Hari Singh appealed to India for assistance and agreed to accede to
India. Indian forces blunted the invasion and re-conquered vast areas.
First, India erred by not insisting on unequivocal accession of the state to the Dominion of India and
granted special status to it through Article 380 of the Constitution. Secondly, when on the verge of
evicting all invaders and recapturing the complete state, India halted operations on 1 January 1949
and appealed to the Security Council. It is the only case in known history wherein a country, when
on the threshold of complete victory, has voluntarily forsaken it in the misplaced hope of winning
admiration of the world community. Thirdly and most shockingly, the Indian leadership made a
highly unconstitutional offer of plebiscite in the UN.
Forty percent area of the state continues to be under Pakistan's control, providing it a strategic land
route to China through the Karakoram ranges. As a fall out of the unresolved dispute, India and
Pakistan have fought numerous wars and skirmishes with no solution in sight. Worse, the local
politicians are holding India to ransom by playing the Pak card. Kashmir issue is a self-created
cancerous furuncle that defies all medications and continues to bleed the country.
No 2: Ignoring Chinese Threats and Neglecting the Military

Memories of the year 1962 will always trouble the Indian psyche. A nation of India's size had lulled
itself into believing that its protestations and platitudes of peaceful co-existence would be
reciprocated by the world. It was often stated that a peace-loving nation like India did not need
military at all. The armed forces were neglected. The political leadership took pride in denigrating
the military leadership and meddled in internal affairs of the services to promote sycophancy.
Foreign policy was in shambles. The intelligence apparatus was rusty.
Even though signs of China's aggressive intentions were clearly discernible for years in advance,
the Indian leadership decided to keep its eyes shut in the fond hope that the problem would resolve
itself. When China struck, the country was caught totally unprepared. Troops were rushed to
snowbound areas with summer clothing and outdated rifles. Despite numerous sagas of gallantry,
the country suffered terrible embarrassment. India was on its knees. With the national morale and
pride in tatters, India was forced to appeal to all nations for military aid. Inept and incompetent
leadership had forced a proud nation to find solace in Lata Mangeshkar's Ae Mere Watan Ke Logo.
No 3: The Tashkent Agreement and Return of Haji Pir Pass

Following the cease-fire after the Indo-Pak War of 1965, a Russian-sponsored agreement was
signed between India and Pakistan in Tashkent on 10 January 1966. Under the agreement, India
agreed to return the strategic Haji Pir pass to Pakistan which it had captured in August 1965 against
heavy odds and at a huge human cost. The pass connects Poonch and Uri sectors in Jammu and
Kashmir and reduces the distance between the two sectors to 15 km whereas the alternate route
entails a travel of over 200 km. India got nothing in return except an undertaking by Pakistan to
abjure war, an undertaking which meant little as Pakistan never had any intention of honouring it.
Return of the vital Haji Pir pass was a mistake of monumental proportions for which India is
suffering to date. In addition to denying a direct link between Poonch and Uri sectors, the pass is
being effectively used by Pakistan to sponsor infiltration of terrorists into India. Inability to resist
Russian pressure was a manifestation of the spineless Indian foreign policy and shortsighted
Image: General (then a major) Ranjit Singh Dayal (3rd from right) and his men relax at the
strategic Haji Pir pass after routing Pakistani soldiers in a surprise attack at 11 am, 28th August,
1965. The pass was returned to Pakistan following the Tashkent Agreement signed on January
10, 1966. Picture courtesy Col (retd) and military historian Anil Shorey. Unauthorised
reproduction prohibited.
No 4: The Simla Agreement

With the fall of Dhaka on 16 December 1971, India had scored a decisive victory over Pakistan.
Over 96,000 Pak soldiers were taken Prisoners of War (PoWs). Later, an agreement was signed
between the two countries on 2 July 1972 at Shimla. Both countries agreed to exchange all PoWs,
respect the line of control (LOC) in Jammu and Kashmir and refrain from the use of threat or force.
Additionally, Bhutto gave a solemn verbal undertaking to accept LOC as the de facto border.
India released all Pak PoWs in good faith. Pakistan, on the other hand, released only 617 Indian
PoWs while holding back 54 PoWs who are still languishing in Pakistani jails. The Indian
Government has admitted this fact a number of times but has failed to secure their release. India
failed to use the leverage of 96,000 Pak PoWs to discipline Pakistan. A rare opportunity was thus
wasted. Forget establishing permanent peace in the sub-continent, India failed to ensure release of
all Indian PoWs - a criminal omission by all accounts.
The naivety of the Indian delegation can be seen from the fact that it allowed Pakistan to bluff its
way through at Shimla. The Indian leadership was fooled into believing Pakistan's sincerity.
Unquestionably, Pakistan never intended to abide by its promises, both written and verbal. Fruits of
a hard-fought victory in the battlefield were frittered away on the negotiating table by the bungling
No. 5: The Nuclear Muddle

Subsequent to the Chinese Nuclear Test at Lop Nor in 1964, India showed rare courage in carrying
out its first nuclear test on 18 May 1974 at Pokharan. Outside the five permanent members of the
UN Security Council, India was the only nation to prove its nuclear capability. The whole country
was ecstatic and every Indian felt proud of its scientific prowess. But Indians had not contended
with their Government's penchant for converting opportunity into adversity and squandering hard-
earned gains.
Instead of asserting India's newly acquired status of a nuclear power and demanding recognition,
India turned apologetic and tried to convince the world that it had no nuclear ambitions. Strangely,
it termed the Pokharan test as a 'peaceful nuclear explosion' - a term unheard of till then. The
Defence Minister went to the extent of claiming that the Indian nuclear experiment was 'only for
mining, oil and gas prospecting, for finding underground sources of water, for diverting rivers, for
scientific and technological knowledge.' It was a self-deprecating stance. Displaying acute
inferiority complex, India did not want to be counted as a member of the exclusive nuclear club.
Criticism and sanctions were expected and must have been factored in before opting for the nuclear
test. Whereas a few more assertive follow-on tests would have forced the world to accept India as a
member of the nuclear club, India went into an overdrive to placate the world through a self-
imposed moratorium on further testing. It lost out on all the advantages provided to it by its
scientists. It suffered sanctions and yet failed to gain recognition as a nuclear power. The country
missed golden opportunities due to the timidity and spinelessness of its leaders.
No 6: The Kandahar hijacking

The hijacking of an Indian Airlines aircraft to Kandahar by Pakistani terrorists in December 1999
will continue to rile India's self-respect for long. According to the Hindustan Times, India lost face
and got reduced to begging for co-operation from the very regimes that were actively undermining
its internal security. The hijacking revealed how ill-prepared India was to face up to the challenges
of international terrorism.
The eight-day long ordeal ended only after India's National Security Adviser brazenly announced
that an agreement had been reached for the release of all the hostages in exchange for three
Kashmiri militants including Maulana Masood Azhar. Sadly, the Prime Minister claimed credit for
forcing the hijackers to climb down on their demands. The worst was yet to follow. India's Foreign
Minister decided to accompany the released militants to Kandahar, as if seeing off honoured guests.
The government's poor crisis-management skills and extreme complacency in security matters
allowed the hijackers to take off from Amritsar airport after 39 minutes halt for refueling, thereby
letting the problem get out of control. India's much-vaunted decision-making apparatus collapsed
and was completely paralysed by the audacity of a bunch of motivated fanatics. It was a
comprehensive failure of monumental proportions. India's slack and amateurish functioning made
the country earn the tag of a soft nation which it will find very difficult to shed.
No 7: Illegal Immigration and Passage of IMDT Act

It is a standard practice all over the world that the burden of proving one's status as a bonafide
citizen of a country falls on the accused. It is so for India as well under Foreigners Act, 1946.
Political expediency forced the Government to make an exception for Assam. In one of the most
short-sighted and anti-national moves, India passed the Illegal Migrants - Determination by
Tribunals (IMDT) Act of 1984 for Assam. It shifted the onus of proving the illegal status of a
suspected immigrant on to the accuser, which was a tall and virtually impossible order. Detection
and deportation of illegal immigrants became impossible.
Whenever demands were raised for repealing the Act, the Congress, the Left Front and the United
Minorities Front resisted strongly. Illegal immigrants had become the most loyal vote bank of the
Congress. Worse, every protest against the Act was dubbed as 'anti-minority', thereby imparting
communal colour to an issue of national security. The government's 'pardon' of all Bangladeshis
who had come in before 1985 was another unconstitutional act that aggravated the problem.
The Act was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court on July 13, 2005, more than 20
years after its enactment. The Apex Court was of the view that the influx of Bangladeshi nationals
into Assam posed a threat to the integrity and security of northeastern region. Unfortunately,
immense damage had already been done to the demography of Assam and the local people of
Assam had been reduced to minority status in certain districts. Illegal immigrants have come to
have a stranglehold over electioneering to the extent that no party can hope to come to power
without their support. Nearly 30 Islamic groups are thriving in the area to further their Islamist and
Pan-Bangladesh agenda. It is incomprehensible that a nation's leadership can stoop so low and
endanger even national security for garnering votes.