Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. OUTCOMES
Knowledge Process
1. Design and develop a safety door 1. Able to use programming software
controller using PLC to modify internal registers, perform
2. Integrate the program with input/output tasks and compile
hardware and software programming codes.
3. Analyze and evaluate the 2. Able to conduct and control sensors
performance of the system. and actuators.
3. Able to simulate the programs built
with a simulation software and
determine the success of the
program
4. Able to design an algorithm on how
to solve the design problem.
2. PROFILE OF STUDENTS
Number of Students: 71
1) Students able to design the algorithm and integrate the program with the hardware
2) Able to analyze and evaluate the performance of the system.
5. PROBLEM SCENARIO
Due to the nature of the business, the company decides on employing a safety door in
their inventory facilities. Since there are many options available such as sectional up-
and-over type, non protruding type, retractable up-and-over and so on, the facility
manager decided to outsource the project to local company for design and assembly to
get the best deal.
As one of the bidding company, you are given the following restrictions in your design:
1. The door must have manual buttons on both side of the door (inside and outside)
as well as remote control button
2. The button should have the capability to stop the door midway and continue to
operate in another direction after the second push.
3. There should be mechanisms installed at each end of the door to prevent any
motion overdrive
4. Light beams must be installed across the bottom of the door. Any breakage when
the door closes will stop and reverse the motion of the door.
5. Informational light should be installed and operates for some time after the door
opens or closes.
The facility manager requires full report on your design and you should be able to
produce a miniature prototype for the bidding.
6. FILA/KNL CHART
Ideas/Need to
Facts/Knowledge Learning Issues Action Plan
Know
• Week 10
Team discussion
& self-directed
learning
• Week 11
Synthesis &
Application
• Week 12
Synthesis &
Application
• Week 13
Closure/Reflection
7. ASSESSMENT PLAN
Tool Individual/ Formative/ Weightage Assessed by
Group Summative
Peer-to-peer Individual 2%
review
Instructor
(rubric)
Action Taken:
Followed Up by:
9. PROBLEM-CRAFTING TEAM
Name:
1.