Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
It is difficult to explain this kind of exact calculation which has no basis, formula or table and
mathematical logic.
Corporate Governance is highly related with ethical conduct of business. Business is a form of economic
activity, which is governed by the principal of input and output. Ethics on the other hand is concerned
with moral behavior of individual and clarifies what can be described as right of wrong behavior. Ever
the evaluation of the company from of business, in rapid industrialization era, the shareholder were
considered initially only stakeholders. The separation of ownership and control in corporate sector
enterprises frequently brings about the ‘agency’ problem, wherein management may take actions that
compromise the interests of its shareholders. Business, after all, was supposed to be run on their behalf
and for their benefit. Milton Friedman’s celebrated statement “Business of business is business”
typically represented this thinking. Therefore, some people believe that business has nothing to do with
ethics and vice-versa. Though, this view looks convenient and attractive, it does not carry sound logic.
Business is part and parcel of human life and business organization does not exist and function outside
the society. Therefore, business cannot alienate itself from the concept and norms of good and bad,
developed by human society.
Commitment to well-being and progress of all stakeholders is our age old mantra
- Taittariya Upanishad
Dharma : “Dharma is for the stability of society, the maintenance of social order and the general well-
being and progress of humankind.”
To provide “the maximum happiness for the maximum number of people for the maximum period,
based on the principles of Dharma – righteousness and moral values.”
Capacity, Knowledge and Resources TOWARDS Dharma Maximisation of stakeholders’ value and
well-being and progress of humankind THROUGH Truth Transparency, accountability and truthful
disclosure of state of affairs, This is our own age old mantra of Good Governance
Corporate Governance is the application of best management practices, compliance of law in
letter and spirit and adherence to ethical standards for effective management and distribution of
wealth and discharge of social responsibility for sustainable development of all stakeholders”
By- ICSI
A Conceptual Framework
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which a particular company is governed. In the word of
Adrian Cabdury of U.K. Corporate Governance basically has to do with power and accountability, who
exercise power, on behalf of whom and how the exercise of power is control.
Corporate Governance is system of structural, procedural and cultural safeguard designed to ensure that
a corporation is run in the “best” long-term interests of its shareholders, as well as, other stakeholders.
Corporate Governance may be elaborate as under:
Business Ethic
Philosophy of Business
Culture of Organization
Dynamic Leadership
Corporate Governance is not mealy about “ethical conduct of business” as the SEBI report on the
subject says. It is about leadership. For, Governance means leadership, especially top leadership at the
level of CEO & CFO and the board of the Directors. The manifesto of Corporate Governance must not be
merely a manual of procedure or a legal document or even an ethical code.
Corporate Governance is about maximizing shareholders value legally, ethically and on a sustainable
basis while ensuring fairness to every stakeholder-customer, employee , investor, vendor-partners, the
govt. of the land and community.
N.R. Narayana Murthy has mentioned corporate governance as a reflection of company’s culture
policies, how it deals with its stakeholders and its commitment to value.
In short, good Corporate Governance practices enhance companies’ value of stakeholders’ thrust
resulting into robust development of capital market, the economy and also help in the evaluation of a
vibrant and constructive shareholders’ activism.
Webster dictionary has given a more elaborate and comprehensive description of “Ethics”. It states that
ethics is the discipline dealing with what is good or bad, right or wrong or moral duty or obligation. It is a
group of moral principles or set of values. These principles govern the conduct or an individual or a
profession.
Most people believe that ethics and morality are relevant only to individual. However, one must
remember , that the norms of conduct which apply to common men, should also apply to businessmen.
Business is the part of society and as such ethics is also relevant in the context of business. The business
ethics, however , should be given special attention due to specific problems and opportunities faced by
the businessmen. The society, in general, is unlikely to fact such situations. Though the basic ethical
standards are universal, the differences lies in the application of ethical principles in business situations.
The increasing number of Corporate Scandals in the last few years have stained Corporate Governance
reputation and questioned the effectiveness of its current structure. In light of this, in the paper I would
like to discuss Corporate Governance as well as Business Ethics in the changing scenario as under:
In the opinion of some experts the twenty first century competition is characterized by at least three
fundamental paradigms shifts, viz. -
(a) Ability of organizations and individuals to network globally and seamlessly;
(b) Ability to communicate, transmit, store and retrieve large amounts to information including voice,
data, video; and
(a) The New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1991, announced by the Government of India. This is a
landmark year in the sphere of economic liberalization and trade related reforms. A number of
innovative changes have taken place in the business environment. Major areas of reforms
related to abolition of industrial licensing system except for a short list, opening up of Indian
economy to foreign investment, liberlisation of norms for foreign technology transfer, abolition of
Chapter III of the MRTP Act relating to concentration of economic power, intention of the
Government to adopt a new approach to Public Sector Undertakings including disinvestments
etc. With these policy re-orientation, the role of the Government, as the regulator has changed
from exercising control to one of providing help and guidance by making essential procedures
fully transparent and eliminating delays.
(b) Simplification and rationalization of both direct and indirect tax laws including lowering of tariff
barriers and removal of quantitative restrictions.
(c) Abolition of the office of the Controller of Capital Issues and the setting up of Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI), as an autonomous body to promote, regulate and develop the
capital market on healthy lines and protection of investor’s interests in securities. A number of
Rules and Regulations have been issued by SEBI for regulating the activities of
intermediaries/others in the capital market.
(d) Replacement of Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 by Foreign Exchange Management
Act, 2000 including introduction of convertibility of rupees on current account.
(e) Liberalization of norms for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Indian Industries and also portfolio
investment norms.
(f) Issue of regulations by SEBI regarding SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992,
SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations,
1995 and SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 as
amended from time to time.
(g) Setting up of World Trade Organisation (WTO) as an apex body at the international level, to
which India is a signatory, to regulate and develop international trade on healthy lines.
The aforesaid changes and policy re-orientation have ushered in a new era of liberalized business
and legal environment. Self-regulation of corporate affairs is now the order of the day.
Another development which should not go un-noticed relates to the perceptible change taking place
in India in the profile of corporate ownership, capital market reforms, increasing inflow of foreign capital
both on account of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and portfolio investment, preferential allotment of
shares to the promoters of companies including foreign promoters, the policy of disinvestments being
hotly pursued by the Government of India in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) – these and other factors
are changing the very pattern of corporate ownership. SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares &
Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 as amended from time to time and the permission given to the companies
to buy-back their shares in the market have also contributed to the changing pattern of corporate
ownership.
Globalisation of Indian economy and substantial reduction of tariff barriers-these are pointers to the
changing business environment. These factors have given rise to increasing competition in the market
place for the Indian products and services. There is an imperative need to manufacture and market high
quality products which can withstand the products of foreign manufacturers. The fast changing business
environment calls for a new approach to the management of corporate organisations.
— An “inclusive” approach to directors’ duties which requires directors to have regard to all the
relationships on which the company depends and to the long, as well as the short-term
implications of their actions, with a view to achieving company success for the benefit of
shareholders as a whole; and
The scenario also calls for excellence in performance which can be achieved only through adherence
to good corporate governance principles, such as accountability, transparency, probity, quality of
information and by fulfilling their obligations towards society, the nature and the human well being.
Our success in the future will be entirely dependent upon our ability to identify the opportunities,
synergies our strengths and skills successfully and turn the challenges into opportunities. This is more
important for corporate governance than for any other aspect of the economy. More so, when
corporatization is becoming a way of life with primary, secondary and tertiary sectors increasingly opting
for corporate paradigms.
Transparency and Ethics
A key to good corporate governance is transparency. Transparency expects a free exchange in
information. Well-informed employees are the sound pillars of good corporate governance. The
dissemination of right information to the right people (employees)not only builds up awareness among
them but also enhances their moral and productivity. Many of the wrong doings in the corporate
functioning are due to lack of information, wrong and inadequate information, misunderstood facts or
falsified information. Transparency requires enforcement of right to information-nature, timeliness, and
integrity of the information produced at each level of interface. In fact, transparency is measured by the
outsiders to assess true position of a company –availability of firm specific information to those outside
publicly traded firms.
Transparency is an important value and values are cultivated through awakening, convincing and
persuading and shared meaning of the concept. It is more in the form of a learning process rather than
fixation and imposition of certain rules through coercion. However values once developed and cultivated
also require development of a system of checks and balances. Because human being are susceptible to
voice. Good governance require a system of checks, balances, evaluations and introspections.
The different information which the company should provided to different stakeholders as part of
corporate disclosure is as followed:
1. The customers should be informed about product quality, product-ingredient, product features,
precautions and safety measures, etc. This type of product information is interesting and useful to
the customers as it has a direct/indirect bearing upon the customers’ benefits.
2. The employee should be informed about their duties and responsibilities, nature of work, wages for
the work, rules and regulations relating to performance and behavior, leave policy, rules regarding
transfer and promotion, grievances redressal machinery, monetary and non-monetary benefit to
employees, employees’ right, welfare schemes, rules regarding termination of the services of
employees.
3. The shareholder should be informed about the company’s profitability, safety of their capital future
prospectus and growth plans, financial position of company, its assets and liabilities, its income and
expenditure, state of business affairs and value of investment of shareholders, etc.
4. The government should be informed about the financial results of the company, its tax-liability and
tax payment, compliance of various laws, methods of operations, safety measures, working
conditions, employee satisfaction, environmental protection, product safety, faire prices and faire
trade practices.
5. The general public should be informed about waste disposal management and environmental
protection, employment policy of company, nature of company’s business and its operations,
financial soundness of the company, its products and services.
Conclusion
In India, we need to develop a robust model of CG as a fundamental ingredient for strengthening
economies and developing capital market. No doubt, there are minimum slandered that must be
observed by all corporations as enshrined in the country’s laws or the rules of self-regulatory
organization, the demand of good governance can vary from industry to industry, firm to firm and even
circumstances to circumstances. The notion of having “one size fits all” is not only inappropriate but
undesirable too. Jamshed Irani, Director, Tata Sons Ltd has rightly pointed out that CG is not something,
which can be mandated. Infect, it is a culture which has to be built up gradually with strong link between
the board and the management of company.