б
Рис. 2. Модели исследованных конструкций ТВС:
а — ТВСА; б — ТВС-2М
участок 2
PL 2P PL
EI 2 x Px ,
6 3 2
Литература
[1] Шмелев В.Д., Драгунов Ю.Г., Денисов В.П. и др. Активные зоны ВВЭР для атомных
электростанций. М., Академкнига, 2004.
[2] Лескин С.Т., Шелегов А.С., Слободчук В.И. Физические особенности и конструкция
реактора ВВЭР-1000. М., НИЯУ МИФИ, 2011.
[3] Рыжов С.Б., Мохов В.А., Васильченко И.Н. и др. Опыт разработки и результаты
эксплуатации ТВС-2 и ТВС-2М. Мат. IX Росс. конф. по реакторному материалове-
дению. Димитровград, НИИАР, 2009, с. 5–7.
[4] ANSYS mechanical user's guide. Release 17.2. ANSYS, Inc., 2016.
[5] Каплун А.Б., Морозов Е.М., Олферьева М.А. ANSYS в руках инженера. М., Либро-
ком, 2015.
[6] Азарова Е.Н., Ковалева В.А., Сатин А.А. Влияние конструкционных факторов на
жесткость тепловыделяющих сборок водо-водяных энергетических реакторов.
В: Богатство России. М., Изд-во МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана, 2018, с. 295–296.
Abstract Keywords
Trends in increasing the operating time of the fuel as- Rigidity, stiffener, fuel assembly,
sembly (FA) of a pressurized water reactor (PWR, PWR, Ansys APDL
WWER) led to the systematic abandonment of the use
of corrosion-resistant steels for the manufacture of
stiffeners in favor of zirconium alloys, which led to their
increased deflections. This caused the regulatory bodies
and emergency protection blocking, and, consequently,
reduced the safety of reactor facilities. To solve this
problem, two fundamentally different stiffeners were
developed. The first is formed as a result of welding of
the guide channels to the spacer grids, and the second
with the use of angle bars. An objective comparison of
the deflection of these frames under longitudinal- Received 10.06.2019
transverse loads and with the use of the ANSYS Me- © Bauman Moscow State Technical
chanical APDL v 17.2 program was performed. University, 2019
References
[1] Shmelev V.D., Dragunov Yu.G., Denisov V.P., et al. Aktivnye zony VVER dlya atomnykh
elektrostantsiy [Active zones of VVER for atomic stations]. Moscow, Akademkniga Publ.,
2004 (in Russ.).
[2] Leskin S.T., Shelegov A.S., Slobodchuk V.I. Fizicheskie osobennosti i konstruktsiya
reaktora VVER-1000 [Physical properties and construction of VVER-1000 reactor]. Mos-
cow, NIYaU MEPhI Publ., 2011 (in Russ.).
[3] Ryzhov S.B., Mokhov V.A., Vasil'chenko I.N., et al. [Development experience and exploi-
tation results for TVS-2 and TVS-2M]. Mat. IX Ross. konf. po reaktornomu materi-
alovedeniyu [Proc. IX Russ. conf. on Reactor material engineering]. Dimitrovgrad, NI-
IAR, 2009, pp. 5–7 (in Russ.).
[4] ANSYS mechanical user's guide. Release 17.2. ANSYS, Inc., 2016.
[5] Kaplun A.B., Morozov E.M., Olfer'yeva M.A. ANSYS v rukakh inzhenera [ANSYS in
hands of an engineer]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2015 (in Russ.).
[6] Azarova E.N., Kovaleva V.A., Satin A.A. Vliyanie konstruktsionnykh faktorov na
zhestkost' teplovydelyayushchikh sborok vodo-vodyanykh energeticheskikh reaktorov.
V: Bogatstvo Rossii [Effect of construction aspects on rigidity of fuel assembly of pressur-
ised water reactor. In: Russian wealth]. Moscow, Bauman MSTU Publ., 2018, pp. 295–296
(in Russ.).
[7] Blokhina A.N., Stolotnyuk S.V., Stolotnyuk Ya.D. Comparative analysis of stress-strained
state for VVER-1000 reactor fuel assemblies under dynamic loads. Izvestiya vysshikh
Merinova V.E. — Student, Department of Nuclear Reactors and Power Plants, Bauman Mos-
cow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Scientific advisor — Satin A.A., Cand. Sc. (Eng.), Assoc. Professor, Department of Nuclear
Reactors and Power Plants, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russian
Federation.