Borrowing money into circulation

We have no idea how much money is lent into the economy each year, however the actual figure need
not be known. What matters, is the understanding that all *money exists, due to being lent into
circulation. (*money as we know it - -$ - -today)

When a loan is made, a principal amount is lent into circulation. Of course we know that
interest is charged, and payable along with the principal. We also know, or should know, that
the interest portion is not lent into circulation, which means the interest payment must come
from funds already in circulation. (Think of the game of musical chairs - - -each round sees a
chair taken away, leaving someone without a chair, once the music stops.)

Let us say a loan is given for one million dollars, with an interest rate of 5% per year, and a
one year loan. That means that the one million lent into circulation will be taken out of
circulation at year end, upon final payment of the principal amount of one million, as well as the
$50,000.00 in interest due. In other words, one million was lent into circulation and one million
and fifty thousand removed. (Needless to say, far more than $1,000.000.00 is lent into
circulation annually, and that the interest due is far larger than $50,000.00.) The point is that
every time money is lent into circulation, more money than that which was lent, is removed.

It is akin to you receiving ten pints of blood while loosing 11 pints............Eventually you run
out. The size of the body is the determining factor as to how long the body will live under such
conditions. Hence, this may perhaps be the thinking behind a one world order, to make the
smaller bodies/countries part of one larger body.

Given that money has been lent into circulation under these conditions for decades, the
siphoning of more money out than goes in, is catching up to all. We are nearing the stage
where there, simply, is not enough blood to replace that lost. The traditional way to keep
enough money in circulation is to lend more, which means nothing more than that. However,
more will continue to be systematically removed from circulation. T his is nothing more than a
band aid, and the band aid is loosing its grip. Every time we borrow money, we are adding onto
the burdens of ourselves and others because we all share the same funds in circulation.

Let us say that since 1935, 100 trillion has been lent into circulation. That amount plus
interest is owed and yet the interest does not exist. If you do not understand the interest aspect,
go to the links provided and research for yourself. Do you see the situation we create when we
borrow money? Why do we borrow? Because when we are paid for our labor, we are paid in
after tax dollars, which are less than the total billing for the year. We borrow to make up the
difference; otherwise the contracts could not be fulfilled. How can they be - - - if total billing per
year, coast to coast is 100 Billion, but the workers coast to coast took home only 65 billion?

Question: When you first began to work at a new job for someone else, did you sign any
contract stating that you would agree to give 100% of your labor in exchange for less than 100%
in return? There is definitely someone benefitting from this type of work relationship. The big
question is who. Look at the numbers. Do the math. The numbers don’t lie. When everything
is said and done, you will see by the numbers that the bank is the only winner…… and it brings
nothing of value to the table - - - Zippo.
 Every time one of us accesses credit, it adds to the burdens of all. How un-Godly is that? In
addition, since we caused that burden upon all into existence, for our wants, we are held
responsible for our share of it. If, for no other reason, the Bible gives us great insight into the
world of commerce as we know it, for example….

II Corinthians 8:12-14
12. For if there first be a willing mind, it is accepted according to what a man hath, and not
according to what he hath not.
13. For I mean not that other be eased, and ye burdened:
14. But by equality, that now at this time your abundance may be a supply for their want, that
their abundance also may be a supply for your want: that there may be equality.

There is no concept of equality from doing business with a bank

What is it that you have an abundance of? It is your physical and mental capacity/energy.
What do you supply with your energy? It is your labour that equates into assets and value.

Rather than to give freely, as God/Creator has; by borrowing from a bank means that you
would rather pledge, which is to say: THIS IS MINE - - - when the truth is nothing is yours……
not even the energy flowing to and through you. *Look at verse 12 again "according to what a
man hath". What is it that a man hath? Is man born with money or energy?
If you give all you have to give (energy), freely, you have given all you hath, according to what
you hath to give? Yes or no.

There comes a time here when we need not look to the books to find ourselves. Eventually
we come to the realization of certain truths. If one must rely on who they are, from books, it
surely means they do not know.

In the movie, The Matrix, When Neo surrendered his energy to the matrix freely; there was
no more resistance - - - it was over. He had given all he had at that point, his energy - - - and
there was nothing more he could give. It was never about money. It was about what he had.
This was what the matrix wanted. “The matrix does not want money - - - the matrix issues
money. As previously stated, when you are prepared to give freely, you shall receive
freely. When the matrix knows our energy is given to it freely, it knows we are no longer subject
to attack because it has received all we have to give. It is for not giving, that we face the wrath
of the matrix. So it is not the surrender of assets the matrix wants. It is the surrender of our God
given/ freely received energy, because with that - - - all that follows is free on our account.
Once it has been given, it cannot be taken. Once given, there is no point in issuing charges
into our hand (civilly dead). So the civil death being referred to is not a result of us selling our
freely received/God given energy - - - but in giving it freely.

The reason we receive charges in hand, regardless of the name appearing on it, is because
we have money flowing our way. It does not matter what name is on a charge, be it our name
or not, upper lower case or all cap, it is about the money. Either we have it or we do not - - -
and the fact we were not born with it means we do not have it. If we recognize this fact and if
it’s dealt with properly, it is a lawful excuse not to have to pay it. Hence, “I use the BC of
necessity”; means not because of a choice to do so for my own purposes or advantage or
gain. When the matrix knows our energy is free, that we are not a paid employee, and
everything we do is for righteous reasons, it will leave us alone. It targets those with money or
those that believe in the need of it, because it knows it will get performance. To make the point,
if all labor in Canada is free, the matrix would know full well that no laborer has money, and thus
would not issue charges to laborers. At that point, if the state required us to have a driver
license, it would have to give it to us, wouldn’t it?

Some may view this, and other information from a, "how can it help me" perspective. For the
sake of not letting our ego get the better of us, it may be best to view through the perspective of,
"how can I help all". We can start by not borrowing money, supporting banks, and cease
coveting thy neighbor. We can cease in the asking of others for money, knowing the true cost
upon them and ourselves, to get / or have it. The “me” aspect is what empowers the banks. It is
what the banker counts on, and is proven by the many people who will do as they are told, so as
not to loose what they have - - - all the while in bondage for their want. Let go of the “me- me-
me” and it becomes WE.

Corporations are birthed /founded on money. Therefore if we have it, it must be because it is
a necessity - - - just like it is for legal entities (corporations). So operating from that line of
reasoning, one might conclude that we are acting like a legal entity, or at the very least, seen as
though we are a legal entity. Are we - - - or not? Pointless to claim non corporate status, when
on the face, money is a necessity. We have heard it a thousand times. "How am I going to get
food without money," is our testifying that we know of no other way to live, other than on
money.........thus it appears to be a necessity for us - - - but not really, because we were
founded of love - - - not money. All the laws, rules and regulations are in place on behalf of the
banks. It is all about money. Get out of the money game and you are not susceptible to the
laws.

Soon, it seems, health products will only be available by prescription. So what - - - if we get
out of the money game, the prescription thing would be useless, wouldn't it? Same as applying
for a driver license would be useless if we made it known that we have not the money, and offer
the lawful excuse. Perhaps then, a license would be given to us. But as long as we are
wrapped up in all the wrong out there, our mind is too busy to see beyond the smoke and
mirrors.............It is a consideration that most of what goes on in our lives, and the turmoil we
see, is there to keep our focus on it, so that we do not seek some other path.

In whose interest do you think it is to outlaw home grown food? It is in the interest of the
banks. If home grown food is outlawed, we will have to work harder to get more disposable
income to buy it at their prices, which will never be enough, thus we will borrow money from the
bank. See the game being played here. It is about the money and our belief in it - - - that shit
happens.

Free will is a beautiful thing, so therefore it’s your choice to be a source of funds if you want
to be. Fact is the government registered your birth (live event), and knows full well you are not
born with, or founded on money. But we all keep playing in their game, and so their rules apply.
We keep wanting to change their game rather than cease playing with monopolized money. To
take out the banks through legal or lawful means would be a massive undertaking, whereas if
one simply states the truth, “I WAS NOT BORN WITH MONEY - - - -AND SO DO NOT HAVE
ANY", they become free of the bank. They need you to believe in money so that they can get
your energy and control you - - - that is what this is about.

The system gets full benefit of our energy and we get, “after tax less than”. We need to
wake up people. The book, “Babylonian Woe” will open your eyes to the present consciousness
we have. The idea of no money, is foreign to us and so the mind goes blank when it comes
down to, “how do I get by without it?” You can't - - - but you can ask for it.
Thing is not to be the source/cause of borrowed money (plus interest) into existence, or
you are liable for your share of the burdens you add unto all.......................

We have done what we have done. We are in the game and the information systems prove
it. Regardless of the name the accounting is done under, we did it. To say I am not responsible
because the legal name is not my name, is a cop out. You cause debt upon others - - - you are
responsible. You did it - - - not the name.
The legal alternative to asking for money is to work for it, but that act is more damaging than
asking for it.

As the second hand story goes, the fellow in New Zealand said enough with BC in hand, that
the judge said, "The crown consolidated fund pays the charges". Say what! How can that be?
Why did the judge not order the fellow to pay?

It is very clear now, that everything we do, and everywhere we go - - - is accounted in

information systems, and each one testifies to a belief in money. “Third party banker
monopoly money.” In Canada, courts issue binding decisions that are recognized by the
system - - - not recognized by me…. Not recognized by you…. but only by the system. In all
probability, the lawyers are well aware of that fact, and are not in any hurry to settle with you or
me, because they know they don't have to. In other words, you can send all the letters and
statements and claims you want, but until a binding declaration is made - - - that is recognized
everywhere, there is no such agreement.

The feeling is that judges work either for us or for the bank, and that we decide which, by our
actions. If we owe money, then we are in the game, and the judge sits on the bench to enforce
the law of contract - - - generally in favor of a lender. If we are not in the money game, then the
judge works for us. In all cases, and at all material times, we decide by our actions (who we
are), as to whom the judge is there to serve.

It has been seen many times where people go to court - - - they did get a loan, but are not
taking responsibility. That is when the judge looks at the defendant with devilish eyes, not
because he is the devil, but because the defendant is. A lady in court, stated she had no money
and could not pay, but when the fine amount got down to $25.00 dollars from over $100.00, all
of the sudden she had money. So you see, she started with "I have no money," but in the end
she did. She came very close to dealing in the truth, which is, I WAS NOT BORN WITH
MONEY, DON'T HAVE ANY, AND THE PARTY THAT REGISTERED MY BIRTH KNOWS
THAT FULL WELL - - - But I do have this BC to surrender to the court if it will help.

“Oh, but you go to work to get money”. Well your honor; that is not going to happen.
Aside from the fact no law requires me, as a source of, or to provide funds; to do as you suggest
is to burden you and the crown, and every man, woman and child in Canada, and every
corporation and government - - - and I am not going to do that to you or them, for my sake.
“Can you borrow the money”? I could your honor, but that will add even more burdens
upon all, and I am not going there, just so we can settle this debt here, for my benefit. In other
words, I am not doing that to fake the easing of my burdens, knowing it will add to yours and
mine. There is no equality in that, now, is there?

There are many who share information regarding all of the bad things that are being done to
us, or being proposed to be done. We need to take a very deep look at what we want to be part
of our reality. Let us be solution oriented - - - or nothing............You can play “victim” and battle
with all the “victimizers” you want, but the one thing they need is for us to believe in money, and
to do as we have been doing, to get it. That only benefits the bank in the end. All, who are
currently involved with money/banking, are loosing, and will continue to loose, so long as they
remain in the money game.

There was a time not long ago, where interest was illegal. Interest on money is what brings
about the demise of economies big and small. We can complain about interest or simply not
partake in that which leads to interest charges.

Play the game monopoly, and see who never looses - - - the banker - - -and there is the
target……. Not to blame - - - but to cease dealing through.

Love to all…….