Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica ñ Drug Research, Vol. 64 No. 4 pp.

327ñ333, 2007 ISSN 0001-6837


Polish Pharmaceutical Society

THE QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF ETHANOL EXTRACTS OF HERBAL RAW


MATERIALS BY METHOD OF HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID
CHROMATOGRAPHY
ZENONA KALVËNIENË, SAULË VELÞIENË, KRISTINA RAMANAUSKIENË*, ARÛNAS
SAVICKAS, LIUDAS IVANAUSKAS1 and VALDAS BRUSOKAS2.

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Social Pharmacy, 1Department of Analytic and


Toxicological Chemistry, 2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, Kaunas
University of Medicine, A. MisckeviËiaus g. 9 LT 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
Abstract: The article describes the qualitative analysis of ethanol extracts from St. Johnís wort, cinnamon bark,
rosemary leaves, lavender flowers, and ginger rhizomes, and the extract of their mixture using the method of
high pressure liquid chromatography in order to identify flavonoids. The aim of the study was to identify the
amounts of rutin, hyperoside, quercetin, and other flavonoids in the multi-component extract as well as in the
control extracts of its compositional parts using the method of high pressure liquid chromatography, by evalu-
ation of the correlation between the amounts of flavonoids in the extracts. The evaluation of the results of the
study showed that flavonoid amount in the control extracts of the herbal material and flavonoid amount in the
ethanol extracts of the mixture of raw material did not differ significantly. It was found that the largest amount
of flavonoids was extracted from St. Johnís wort. The results of the analysis confirmed the assumption that the
yield of flavonoids from St. Johnís wort has no influence on the active substance of other medicinal herbal raw
materials.
Keywords: St. Johnís wort, ginger, cinnamon, lavender, rosemary, flavonoids

At present, the use of complex liquid herbal 8). All these raw materials can be used for the treat-
preparations has been increasing. Taking into con- ment and prophylaxis of digestion disorders.
sideration the needs of Lithuanian consumers, we The herbal raw material of St. Johnís wort
chose to produce a new sedative, indigestion-reliev- (Hyperici herba) with sedative and anti-depressive
ing complex phytopreparation. For the preparation action of its biologically active substances was
of the multi-componential herbal extract, we select- selected. It is one of the most popular herbs in
ed herbal raw material (ginger rhizomes, cinnamon Lithuania, which is attributed to the traditional
bark, rosemary leaves, and lavender flowers) with group of medicinal plants. St. Johnís wort accumu-
sedative and indigestion-relieving effects of its bio- lates up to 13 per cent of enzymes, 0.1 ñ 1.25 per
logically active substances. During the selection of cent of essential oils, up to 8 per cent of flavonoids
the raw material, attempts were made to achieve that (rutin, quercetin, quercitrin, hyperoside) as well as
the biologically active substances in the composition antrachinones (hypericin and its derivatives), hyper-
of herbal raw materials, i.e. essential oils (borneol, phorin, carotinoids, and resins (2, 9, 10).
bisabolene, cineol, camphor, linalool, terpineol, Flavonoids, i.e. quercetin and quercitrin are distin-
eugenol, cinnamaldehyde, gingerol, shogaol, geran- guished by their sedative and antidepressive effects
iol) and flavonoids (hyperforin, quercitrin, iso- of monoamine oxydase A type. Xantones also act as
quercitrin, rutin), would be targeted at particular monoamine oxydase A inhibitors: they inhibit anxi-
symptoms and would complement each otherís ety. Biflavonoids possess great affinity to benzodi-
effect. Four herbal raw materials with positive azepine receptors. They relieve anxiety and stimu-
effects of their active substances on digestive tract late sleep (11-15). R. F. Weiss recommended St.
disorders were selected. According to literature, the Johnís wort ëfor the treatment of somatogenic and
main active substances of the component raw mate- psychogenic forms of depressioní (16). In the
rials, i.e. ginger rhizomes, rosemary leaves, cinna- Republic of Lithuania, the following indications of
mon bark, and lavender flowers are essential oils (1- St. Johnís wort are approved: the complementary

* Correspondence: Kristina RamanauskienÎ , tel +370 37 327255, +370 601 02567, e-mail povvis@gmail.com;

327
328 ZENONA KALVËNIENË et al.

Table 1. The composition of herbal extracts.

Composition of a multi-component Ratio of crude drug and ethanol in Ratio of crude drug and ethanol in
extract a multi-component extract control extract

St. Johnís wort herb (4 parts), 1. St. Johnís wort herb 1 part, 1. St. Johnís wort herb extract, ratio
ethanol 12.5 parts 1:12.5
Ginger rhizome (3 parts),
2. Ginger rhizome 1 part, ethanol 2. Ginger rhizome extract, ratio
Cinnamon bark (1 part), 16.7 1:16.7

Rosemary leaves (1 part), 3. Cinnamon bark 1 part, ethanol 3. Cinnamon bark extract, ratio
50 parts 1:50
Lavender flowers (1 part)
4. Rosemary leaves 1 part, ethanol 4. Rosemary leaves extract, ratio
1 part of crude drug mixture 50 parts 1:50
requires 5 parts of ethanol
5. Lavender flowers 1 part, ethanol 5. Lavender flowers extract, ratio
50 parts 1:50

Table 2. The quantitative identification of active compounds in herbal extracts.

Active Extract of Extract of Extract of Extract of Extract of Extract of


compounds, St. Johnës ginger cinnamon lavender rosemary the mixture of
µg/mL wort rhizomes bark flowers leaves herbal raw materials
Quercetin 700.04 1.11 568.1
Hyperoside 477.82 39.9 11.42 664.78
Rutin 531.49 11.68 658.22
Chlorogenic
acid 169.58 1.96 171.86
Caffeic acid 0.83
Astragalin
Keampferol 0.62 84.0
Quercitrin 1.90
Apigenin-
7-glycosyde 0.49
Vitexin
rhamnoside 19.5
Vicenin 20.68
Orientin 0.43

remedy for the treatment of neurotic depressions, flavonoids in a multi-component extract using the
sleep disorders, and anxiety; the anti-inflammatory method of high pressure liquid chromatography, by
and wound-healing remedy (17). For the study of estimating the correlation among the amounts of
herbal extracts, the same methods of analysis as flavonoids in the extract.
those for chemical drugs are applied, and their
results are evaluated according to analogous criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS
High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was
selected as a reliable method of analysis. This The object of the analysis is a multi-component
method allows for a qualitative and quantitative herbal extract containing: herbs of St. Johnís wort,
analysis of components of herbal extracts (18-20). It ginger rhizomes, cinnamon bark, rosemary leaves,
seems relevant to analyze the chemical composition lavender flowers, and 70 % ethanol (Table 1).
of the prepared extracts and to prove that St. Johnís For the qualitative and quantitative identifi-
wort is a major source of flavonoids. cation of flavonoids in the extracts of the crude
The aim of the study was to identify the drug, control extracts were prepared, with the ratio
amounts of rutin, hyperoside, quercetin and other of crude drug and the vehicle matching the ratio of
The qualitative analysis of ethanol extracts of herbal raw... 329

the multi-component extract (Table 1). The Gradient shift: from 0 min ñ 5% of eluent A and
method of the preparation was percolation (21-23). 95% of eluent B; from 45.0 min ñ 45% of eluent A
The solvent of the crude herbal materials is 70 % and 55% of eluent B; from 60.0 min ñ 5% of elu-
ethanol. Identification of flavonoids was per- ent A and 95% of eluent B. The eluent flow rate
formed using high pressure liquid chromatogra- was 0.4 mL/min. Preparation of the tested solu-
phy; the equipment used was a chromatograph tion: the extract was filtered through a membrane
Waters 2690 with the spectrophotometric detector filter with pore diameter of 5 µm and diluted with
Waters 2487; chromatographic column ÑX-Terraì 70% vol. ethanol solution, ratio 1 : 1. Flavonoids
RP18 3,5 µm, column dimensions 3.0 × 150 mm; were identified at 360 nm wavelength. The com-
the volume of injected sample was 10 µl. Elution pounds were identified and their amounts in
is gradient, i.e. the composition of the gradient extract calculated according to the length of reten-
changes with time. Eluent A: acetonitrile and tri- tion of the extracted components, peak areas, and
fluoroacetic acid (99.9:0.1, v/v). Eluent B: dis- ratios between individual peak areas and those of
tilled water and trifluoroacetic acid (99.9:0.1, v/v). standard peaks.

Figure 1. The chromatogram of flavonoid identification by HPLC in the extract of the multi-component herbal mixture.
1 ñ chlorogenic acid; 2 ñ caffeic acid; 3 ñ vicenin; 4 ñ orientin; 5 ñ vitexin-4-rhamnoside; 6 ñ vitexin; 7 ñ isovitexin; 8 ñ rutin; 9 ñ hyper-
oside; 10 ñ apigenin-7-glucoside; 11 ñastragalin; 12 ñ quercitrin; 13 ñ luteolin; 14 ñ quercetin; 15 ñ apigenin; 16 ñ kaempferol.

Figure 2. The chromatogram of flavonoid identification by HPLC in the control extraction of St. Johnís wort.
1 ñ chlorogenic acid; 2 ñ caffeic acid; 3 ñ vicenin; 4 ñ orientin; 5 ñ vitexin-4-rhamnoside; 6 ñ vitexin; 7 ñ isovitexin; 8 ñ rutin; 9 ñ hyper-
oside; 10 ñ apigenin-7-glucoside; 11 ñastragalin; 12 ñ quercitrin; 13 ñ luteolin; 14 ñ quercetin; 15 ñ apigenin; 16 ñ kaempferol.
330 ZENONA KALVËNIENË et al.

Figure 3. The chromatogram of flavonoid identification by HPLC in the control extraction of ginger rhizomes.
1 ñ chlorogenic acid; 2 ñ caffeic acid; 3 ñ vicenin; 4 ñ orientin; 7 ñ isovitexin; 8 ñ rutin; 10 ñ apigenin-7-glucoside; 11 ñastragalin; 12 ñ
quercitrin; 13 ñ luteolin; 14 ñ quercetin; 16 ñ kaempferol.

Figure 4. The chromatogram of flavonoid identification by HPLC in the control extract of cinnamon bark.
1 ñ chlorogenic acid; 2 ñ caffeic acid; 3 ñ vicenin; 4 ñ orientin; 5 ñ vitexin-4-rhamnoside; 6 ñ vitexin; 7 ñ isovitexin; 8 ñ rutin; 9 ñ hyper-
oside; 10 ñ apigenin-7-glucoside; 11 ñastragalin; 12 ñ quercitrin; 13 ñ luteolin; 14 ñ quercetin; 15 ñ apigenin; 16 ñ kaempferol.

RESULTS Furthermore, not only flavonoids but also two phe-


nolic acids ñ caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid ñ
In the prepared multi-component extract were identified in SJWCE (Fig. 2). The amount of
(MCE), the largest amounts of the following chlorogenic acid was measured (Table 2). In the
flavonoids were identified: hyperoside, quercetin, control extract of ginger (GCE), phenolic acids, i.e.
rutin; chlorogenic acid was also identified (Table 2). caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid were identified
Figure 1 shows a chromatogram in which other and their amounts measured (Table 2). The results of
active substances in addition to the above-men- the analysis have shown a small amount of
tioned flavonoids in the multi-component herbal flavonoids in ginger rhizome extract, which is con-
extract were found. In the control extract of St. gruent with the data in the literature (1-3, 5, 11).
Johnís wort (SJWCE), similar flavonoids were iden- Flavonoids were not detected in this extract (Fig. 3).
tified and their amounts measured (Table 2). In the control extract of cinnamon bark (CCE), very
The qualitative analysis of ethanol extracts of herbal raw... 331

Figure 5. The chromatogram of flavonoid identification by HPLC in the control extract of lavender flowers.
1 ñ chlorogenic acid; 2 ñ caffeic acid; 3 ñ vicenin; 4 ñ orientin; 5 ñ vitexin-4-rhamnoside; 6 ñ vitexin; 7 ñ isovitexin; 8 ñ rutin; 9 ñ hyper-
oside; 10 ñ apigenin-7-glucoside; 11 ñastragalin; 12 ñ quercitrin; 13 ñ luteolin; 14 ñ quercetin; 15 ñ apigenin; 16 ñ kaempferol

Figure 6. The chromatogram of flavonoid identification by HPLC in the control extraction of rosemary leaves.
2 ñ caffeic acid; 5 ñ vitexin-4-rhamnoside; 6 ñ vitexin; 7 ñ isovitexin; 8 ñ rutin; 9 ñ hyperoside; 10 ñ apigenin-7-glucoside; 11 ñastragalin;
12 ñ quercitrin; 13 ñ luteolin; 14 ñ quercetin; 16 ñ kaempferol

small amounts of the following substances were (RCE), the following compounds and their amounts
identified: quercetin, apigenin-7-glycoside, were identified: caffeic acid, isovitexin, luteolin
quercitrin, and kaempferol (Table 2). In the chro- (Fig. 6). A big part of the area under peaks belongs
matogram (Fig. 4), hyperoside, rutin, luteolin, to some unidentified compounds released during 31
chlorogenic and caffeic acids were identified; how- and 34-36 min., and the length of their release sig-
ever, their amounts were not significant. The largest nificantly differs from the release of the standards
amount of biologically active substances in crude from the column (Fig. 6).
cinnamon belongs to essential oils (1-3, 11), and the The study showed that the highest amount of
amount of the identified flavonoids is not pharma- flavonoids (hyperoside, rutin, quercetin) and chloro-
cologically relevant (Table 2). In the control extract genic acid was released from the control extract of
of lavender flowers (LCE), hyperoside, vitexin, St. Johnís wort (Fig. 7). Figure 7 shows that the con-
rhamnoside, vicenin, and rutin were identified trol extract of St. Johnís wort yields the largest
(Table 2). In addition to these, luteolin, apigenin, amount of quercetin and the smallest amount of
and apigenin-7-glycoside were also found in LCE chlorogenic acid. The identified amounts of
(Fig. 5). In the control extract of rosemary leaves flavonoids in the control extract of lavender, cinna-
332 ZENONA KALVËNIENË et al.

Figure 7. Correlation of flavonoid amounts in extracts.

mon and rosemary are relatively small if compared 1. Blumenthal M., Goldberg A., Brinckmann J.
to the control extract of St. Johnís wort (Fig. 7). Eds.: in Herbal Medicine: Expanded
Therefore, it can be stated that the largest amount of Commission E Monographs. Integrative
flavonoids in the multi-component extract is extract- Medicine Communications, Boston 2000.
ed from crude herbs of St. Johnís wort. This coin- 3. Bone K. A.: Clinical guide to blending liquid
cides with the data in the literature, in particular that herbs. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 2003.
the main flavonoids in the herbs of St. Johnís wort 4. Czygan I., Czygan F.C.: Z. Phytother. 18, 182
are hyperoside, rutin and quercetin (2, 9, 10). The (1997).
comparison of the findings in control extract and in 5. Yoshikava M., Hatakeyama S., Chatani M., et
the extract of the mixture of the herbal raw materi- al. : Yakugaku Zasshi 113, 307 (1993).
als showed that the amount of flavonoids differed 6. Mac Leod A. J., Pieris N. M.: Phytochemistry
insignificantly, which supports our assumption that 23: 353 (1997).
other components of the herbal mixture have no 7. Schneider E. : Z. Phytother. 9: 193 (1988).
influence on the yield of flavonoids. The method of 8. Suekawa M., Ishige A., Yuasa K., et al.:
high pressure liquid chromatography has confirmed Pharmacobiodynamic 7, 836 (1984).
the compatibility of biologically active substances 9. Nahrstedt A., Butterwck V. :
that were extracted from the mixtures of herbal raw Pharmacopsychiatry 30, 129 (1997).
materials. 10. Wichtl M.: Teedrogen und Phytopharmaka. 3
ed., p. 309, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgessel-
CONCLUSION schaft mbH, Stuttgart 1997.
11. ESCOP Monographs: The Scientific
Using the method of high pressure liquid chro- Foundation for Herbal Medicinal Products. 2nd
matography it was found that the largest amount of ed., p. 269, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
flavonoids is extracted from crude herbs of St. 2003.
Johnís wort; therefore, the amount of flavonoids in 12. Laakmann G., Dienel A., Kieser M.:
a multi-component extract differs insignificantly Phytomedicine 5, 435 (1998).
from the flavonoid amount in the extract of St. 13. Vitiello B.: J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 51, 513
Johnís wort. (1999).
14. De Smet P. A., Nolen W. A.: Br. Med. J. 313,
REFERENCES 241 (1996).
15. Harrer G., Sommer H.: Phytomedicine 1, 3
1. Bisset N.G., Wichtl M. Eds. Herbal drugs and (1994).
phytopharmaceuticals. 2nd ed. pp. 148, 273, 16. Weiss R.F., Feintelman V.: Ligø gydymas vais-
292, 428, 537, Medpharm GmbH Scientific tiniais augalais. p. 212, Avicena, Vilnius 1999
Publishers, Stuttgart 2001. (in Lithuanian).
The qualitative analysis of ethanol extracts of herbal raw... 333

17. European Pharmacopoeia. 4th ed., p. 570, 21. Velþienë S., Savickas A., Briedis V.:
Council of Europe, Strasbourg 2005. Biomedicina 3, 162 (2002) (in Lithuanian).
18. Engelhardt H., Ed. Practice of High 22. Kalvënienë Z., Savickas A., ävambaris L.K.,
Performance Liquid Chromatography. Briedis V., Bernatonis D.: Medicina 38, 1009
Equipment and Quantative Analysis. p. 20, (2002). (in Lithuanian).
Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1986. 23. Ramanauskienë K, Savickas A, Bernatonienë
19. Kosman V.M., Zenkevich I.G.: Rastitelnyje J.: Medicina 40, 745 (2004) (in Lithuanian).
resursy 73, 14 (1997) (in Russian).
20. Smith R.M. Ed.: Retention and selectivity in Received: 5.01.2007
liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Library,
vol. 57 p. 462, Elsevier, 1995.

Вам также может понравиться