You are on page 1of 16

Digitally signed by

Joseph Zernik
DN: cn=Joseph Zernik, o,
ou,
email=jz12345@earthlink
.net, c=US
Date: 2011.05.18 07:14:07
+03'00'

AFFIDAVII OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

I, William M. Windsor, the undersigned, hereby declare under penalty of

perJury:

1. My name is William M. Windsor ("Windsor"). I am over the age of21,

am competent to testifY, and have personal knowledge olthe matters stated herein.

2. On May 17,201 I at 2:03 pm EDT, I entered the Office of the Clerk of

the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 75 Spring

Street, 22'" Floor, Atlanta, Fulton County Georgia 30303.

3. I presented two letters to Chief Deputy Clerk Douglas J. Mincher

requesting to access court records, to inspect, and to copy in cases 1:09-CV-01543-

WSD, 1:09-CV-02027-WSD, and I:06-CV-0714-0DE in the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of

Mr. Mincher's business card that I requested and obtained.

4. Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of one of the requests.

5. Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy olthe other request.

6. Mr. Mincher refused my request to stamp my copy olthe letters

"Received."

7. I was also denied access to any and all the records in my cases after

politely requesting access to the court records to inspect and to copy.

1
8. This is a clear violation of my rights and the rules of the court. Exhibit

4 is a true and correct copy of the relevant rules printed from the clerk's website.

9. Ms. J. White, Miss V. Sanders. Ms. Gitling, an unknown government

employee with Mr. Mincher, and a man who appeared to be a pro se party making

a filing with Miss Sanders all witnessed the interaction.

10. By 2: 10 pm, I left the Clerk's Office, and the time stamp Irom the

parking lot shows that I exited the court property at 2: 18 pm. Exhibit 5 is a true

and correct copy of the parking receipt.

FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that

the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 17th day of May, 20ll.

William M. Windsor

2
Exhibit
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISnuCf OF GEORCIA

Douglas J. Mincher
Chwf Deputy Clerk

2217 Uruted States C"urthousc


75 SrrlIlg Street, S W
Allam", GA 30303-3309 felephune' (404) 215-1610


Exhibit
2
William M. Windsor
PO Box 681236 * Marietta, GA 30068 * 770-578-1094 * Cell: 404-606-1885

May 13,2011

Mr. James N. Hatten


Clerk of the Court
United States District Court Northern District of Georgia
75 Spring Street, SW, 22"' Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3361

Re: Request to access court records, to inspect, and to copy, in 1:09-cv-


01543-WSD and I:09-MJ-0220-WSD)

Dear Mr. Hatten:

Please accept this instant request to access court records in the matter shown on the
docket as Maid afthe Mist Corporation et al v. Alcatraz Media, LLC et al (I :09-
cv-01543-WSD and I :09-MJ-OnO-WSD) pursuant to my First Amendment and
Due Process rights, and U.S. Supreme Court decision in Nixon v Warner
Communications. Inc. (1978).

Instant request is for the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) of records in the
above referenced case, as detailed below. No copies are requested of the records
themselves, only of the NEFs:
1) 06/03/20091 EMERGENCY MOTION
2) 06/03/2009 Submission of 1 EMERGENCY MOTION to Quash Subpoena, submitted to
Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson.
3) 06/08/2009 4 ORDER STAYING CASE
4) 06/10/2009 Case reported statistically. Matter transferred from 1:09-mi-220-WSD. (kt)
(Entered: 0611 0/2009)
5) 06/30/2009 32 ORDER GRANTING
6) 0613012009 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
7) 06/30/2009 Notification of Docket Correction re 32 Order on Motion to Quash
8) 06130/2009 33 CLERK'S JUDGMENT ENTERED.
9) 06/30/2009 Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson terminated from case.
10) 08/17/2009 Submission of36 MOTION to Change Venue to District Judge William S.
Duffey.
11) 08/28/2009 Submission of34 MOTION for Reconsideration
12) 08/31/2009 Submission of 40 MOTION for Joinder
13) 09/03/2009 42 ORDER
14) 0910312009 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
15) 10/14/2009 CERTIFICATE OF READINESS of Appeal Record
16) 10/14/200947 Certilied copy of CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
17) 10/22/200948 USCA Acknowledgment of COR
18) 12/29/200950 Certified and Transmitted Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals
19) 01/04/201051 USCA Acknowledgment of receipt of record on appeal
20) 02/26/20 I0 52 Certified copy of ORDER of USCA DENYfNG Appellant's Emergency
Motion to Disqualify
Eleventh Circuit Judges and Motion to Change Venue",
21) 05107/2010 54 Certified copy of ORDER of USCA DENYING all pending motions filed by
appellant.
22) 06116/2010 WRlT of Execution issued in the amount of$37,333.67 as to William Windsor
per 54 Order
and per the direction of the USCA.
23) 06/17/2010 55 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
24) 0612812010 56 NOTICE Of Filing Writ of Execution for Rule 38 damages award by Maid of
the Mist
Corporation
25) 08/06/20 I0 Submission of 64 MOTION to Expunge Writ of Exceution
26) 08/2612010 Submission of 65 MOTION for Recusal to District Judge William S. Duffey
27) 09/13/2010 Submission of 78 MOTION for Leave to File Emergency Motion2
28) 09/24/2010 ORAL ORDER (by docket entry only) as ordered by Judge William S. Duffey.
.Jr.
29) 09/30/20 I0 Submission of 80 MOTION for Extension of Time MOTION
30) 10/12/2010 Submission of 84 MOTION for Leave to File Response
31) 11/03/201099 ORDER DENYING 60 Motion for Protective Order:
32) 11/0312010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
33) 12/06/2010109 ORDER VACATED, pursuant to 125 Order. ORDER DENYING 107
34) 02/09/2011125 ORDER VACATING 109
35) 05/04/2011158 ORDER re 157 MOTION for Specific Approval to file Motion for Stay
36) 05104/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
37) 05/04/2011159 ORDER DENYING 154 Motion for Leave to Request twelve signed
subpoenas.
38) 05/05/20 II Clerks Certificate of Mailing
39) 0510912011165 ORDER DENYING 153 Motion for Leave to file
40) 05109/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
41) 0511112011166 ORDER rc 165 Order
42) 0511112011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
43) 05/1 112011 ORDER (by docket entry only) denying as moot 167 Motion for Hearing;
44) 05/11/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing

I also request copies of any and all records that are purported to be certificates of mailing,
including:
1) 11103/2010 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
2) 05/04/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
3) 05/05/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
4) 05/09/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
5) 05/11/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing
6) 05111/2011 Clerks Certificate of Mailing

The following record is also requested:

Judgment Index in the above referenced case.

Sincerely,

William M. Windsor
Defendant
Maid a/the Mist Corporation et af v. A fcatraz Media. LLC et af (I :06-cv-0714-
ODE and somehow involved in I :09-cv-OI543-WSD and I :09-Ml-0220-WSD
Exhibit
3
William M. Windsor
PO Box 681236· Marietta, GA 30068·770-578-1094· Cell: 404-606-1885

May 13,2011

Mr. James N. Hatten


Clerk of the Court
United States District Court Northern District of Georgia
75 Spring Street, SW, 22"' Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3361

Re: Request to access court records, to inspect, and to copy, in 1:06-cv-


0714-0DE

Dear Mr. Hatten:

Please accept this instant request to access court records in the matter shown on the
docket as Maid ofthe Mist Corporation et at v. Atcatraz Media, LLC et at (I :06-
CV-0714-0DE) pursuant to my First Amendment and Due Process rights, and U.S.
Supreme Court decision in Nixon v Warner Communications. Inc. (1978).

Instant request is for the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing) of records in the
above referenced case, as detailed below. No copies are requested of the records
themselves, only of the NEFs:

I) 03/28/2006 Dkt #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT


2) 03/29/2006 Dkt #!!. ORDER OF RECUSAL
3) 03/30/2006 Dkt #lQ ORDER granting;l Motion for TRO
4) 08/09/2007 Dkt #251 ORDER denying 146 Motion for Summary Judgment
et
5) 10/16/2007 Dkt #280 ORDER granting 252 Motion for Entry of a Separate
Judgment
6) 10/16/2007 Dkt #281 CLERK'S JUDGMENT
7) 10/29/2008 Dkt #346 ORDER making the USCA mandate the judgment of
this Court
8) 10/30/2008 Dkt #347 CLERK'S REMITTITUR NOTICE
9) OS/22/2009 Dkt #390 ORDER denying the 361 Motion for Recusal
10) 04/08/2010 Dkt #751 Minute Entry for proceedings
II) 04/09/2010 Dkt #752 ORDER
12) 04/09/2010 Dkt #753 CLERK'S JUDGMENT
13) 04/0912010 Dkt # none (after 753) Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
14) 04/09120 I0 Dkt # none (after 753) WRIT of Execution issued in the amount
of$] 92,377.87 against William M. Windsor.

15) Plus all additional Orders, Judgments, and Clerk's Certificates of Mailing
after April 9, 2010, including but not limited to Docket Numbers 758, 777, 782,
794,799,809,811,812,815,816,817,823,833,840,864, 870, 874, 885, 886,
887,909,912,922,934,936, and 937.

The following record is also requested:

16) Judgment Index in the above referenced case.

Sincerely,

William M. Windsor
Defendant
Maid ofthe Mist Corporation et al v. Alcatraz Media, LLC et al (l :06-cv-0714-
ODE)
Exhibit
4
APPENDIXH

STANDING ORDER IN RE: ELECTRONIC


CASE FILING STANDING ORDER No. 04-01
AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

APP.H -1
2. A party may conventionally submit exhibits which are not available in electronic form.
The Clerk's Office will note on the docket its receipt of the document(s) or exhibit(s) with a text~
only entry. Any document filed conventionally will be noted in a Notice of Manual Filing.

3. Because documents scanned in color or containing a graphic take much longer to


upload, filing parties must configure their scanners to scan documents at 200 dpi and in black and
white rather than in color. If a color document is critical to the case, an original color copy can be
filed conventionally or may be scanned in color and then uploaded to ECF.

4. The filing party is required to veritY the readability ofscanned documents before filing
them electronically with the court. (Similar to the copy process, images of scanned documents could
contain pages which skewed during scanning or were omitted altogether.)

5. Exhibits submitted conventionally shall be served on other parties pursuant to section


II(B)(3) of these Procedures governing service of conventional documents. Exhibits filed
conventionally will be listed in an electronically filed Notice of Manual Filing.

V. PUBLIC ACCESS TO CMIECF

A. PUBLIC ACCESS AT THE COURT. Access to the electronic docket and documents
filed in ECF is available to the public at no charge at the Clerk's Office during regular business
hours. A copy fee for an electronic reproduction is required in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §1914.

Conventional copies and certified copies of electronically filed documents may be


purchased at the Clerk's Office. The fee for copying and certifying will be in accordance with 28
U.S.c. §1914.

Please see Section VI regarding public access to electronic transcripts.

B. INTERNET ACCESS. Remote electronic access to ECF for viewing purposes is limited
to subscribers to the Public Access to Court Electronic Records ("PACER") system. The Judicial
Conference of the United States has determined that a user fee will be charged for remotely
accessing certain detailed case information, such as filed documents and docket sheets in civil cases,
but excluding review of calendars and similar general information. 5

5 Non-judiciary CM/ECF users will btl ..::harged a per page fee to access electroni..:: data such as docket sheets and
case documents obtained remotely through the PACER system. A ptlr document cap does not apply to transcripts.
Transcripts may be obtained following a minimum 90 day restriction period for a per page fee, with no per document
cap. Fees will be charged for each access regardless of whether or not the attorney has been given access to the
transcript by the court through CM/ECF. The access fee does not apply to official recipients of electroni<,;
documents, i.e., parties legally required to receive service or to whom service is directed by the filer in the context of
service under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Official recipients will receive the initial electronic copy ufa
document free to download as they setl fit, but if they remotdy access the document again. they will be charged the
standard per page PACER fee.

APP.H - A 13
Exhibit
5
PCA AIL 6E" 001
157 LUCKIE SI H\II
AILAH1~, SA 30303

TERHIHAL I.O.: 13406005


HERCHAHT ft: oaaOB01B1347415
.~"
SALE
BATCH: 080m INUOICE: BOOm
DATE: I'iW 17. 11 TIll: 14:18
RRH: B00116915m AUTH NO: 59m3
mumWilOOB

TOTAL $8.00

ItI WINOSOR

CUSTOHER COP~