Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Research Methodology
Term IV (PT-PGPM)
Oct’09, Section A
We owe many thanks to all who helped in developing this project report. First and the foremost is
Prof. (Dr.) Ajay Kumar Jain who provided continuous guidance in channeling the thoughts into
action.
Our sincere gratitude goes to all who participated in this research by providing their views on
questionnaire and taking time out from their very busy schedules.
Last but not the least we extend our heartfelt thanks to all co-students who are superb.
2
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Abstract
Organizational culture is even more important today than it has previously been before.
Globalization, increased competition and technological change have created a greater need for
innovation, coordination and integration across organizations in order to improve efficiency and
meet the expectations of increasingly more sophisticated clients. And central to achieving this
objective is the motivated people that any organization would have.
This report examines the organizational culture and its impact on employee motivation. The
common definition of organizational culture is adjusted with the aid of the core-task concept.
Organisational culture is defined as a solution created by an organisation for the demands set by the
core task. The development of an organisation’s operations requires an understanding of the overall
dynamics (culture) of the organisation’s activities, but also an assessment of the impact of culture on
employee’s drive.
3
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Abstract............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Table of contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
Methods............................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Results ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Discussion ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Appendix........................................................................................................................................................................................ 20
4
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Chapter 1: Introduction
Organizational culture is a system of common assumptions, values or norms among the members of
an organization which is the basis of their behavior. Organizational culture helps the organization
achieve the abilities needed for adapting itself whit environment requirements, create uniformity and
internal integrity.
These cultural norms and values finally determine the behavior and reactions of each member of the
organization in different conditions and situations. Organizational culture has direct effects on all
parts of the organization such as managerial and functional systems, organization strategies and
technologies, and eventually its outputs. Evaluating the organizational culture we can follow
different approaches such as, analyzing the fundamental assumptions, investigating the cultural gaps
and managerial behavior in the organization. Each of these approaches has their own weak and
strong points. In a comprehensive survey we should apply a mixture of these different approaches
regarding the current situation. Managers and leaders use different tools and mechanisms to make
the organizational culture and the other organization variables converged. But Culture Management
means knowing and applying the current culture in the best way possible, making the desirable
norms and beliefs stronger and the undesirable ones weaker or changed, and eventually stabilizing
the proper organizational culture. Also culture management is a process that continuously
recognizes the current and ideal culture and change the current one in order to develop the proper
values and norms.
A culture is an expression of a group of people. Every culture reflects the current beliefs and
behaviors of its people, as well as the history that shaped them. History is an essential attribute of
culture because one of culture’s defining characteristics is that it persists over time; it gets
transmitted from the present to the future with notable continuity. Hence, when we reflect on our
own situation today, we can see that the past interacts with new forces from our own times, and the
aggregate picture is exactly what constitutes our culture right now.
5
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Chapter 2: Methods
There are different models provided for investigating and analyzing the organizational culture, the
method we chose is Research method. The major research method used questionnaire based in-
depth interviews.
As a group, we prepared several questions, which are used to tailor a questionnaire form and are
used to survey respondents attitudes and opinions about Organisational Culture. The results of
questionnaire forms are always in themselves artifacts and as such they require interpretation and
empirical verification. Questionnaire studies measure the central level of organisational culture i.e.
attitudes, beliefs and values. Used correctly, questionnaires can provide sufficiently valid descriptive
information about an organisation and particularly about the views and attitudes of its staff.
Questionnaires can also be used to clarify the various connections between variables and to explain
statistically the differences found. Understanding the significance of the reasons for the differences
requires research that is more detailed than questionnaire methods, such as interviews, observation
and the analysis of documents. An advantage of questionnaire studies, however, is that one can have
a greater number of participants in a study than in interview studies, for example. With a
questionnaire it is possible to reach all of the members of an organisation. Making different kinds of
comparisons is also more objective, and anonymity is easier to guarantee, than in interview studies,
for example. Without quantitative research, we cannot obtain data that is statistically comparable
with other groups (and organisations) and usable in repeat studies.
Sample details:
More than 100 participants from different Business Sectors like Manufacturing, IT, Consulting etc
were requested to participate in the Survey which were designed specially to understand the
assessing the impact of Cultures and Structures on Employees’ drive.
Informants within individual Sectors came from different levels within the structure: Senior, Junior,
Middle and even Outsourced were involved in the study. In total, 120 responses were received.
6
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Data Collection
Questionnaire based data collection was used. A total of 120 responses were received. There was a
good mix of people from all levels from different industries. The respondents comprised of people
from different industries and different levels of experience in the industry. Following gives a glimpse
of respondents’ profile.
Years in
No of responses
industry
0 to 1 35
2 to 5 60
6 to 9 15
10 or above 10
Total 120
Data analysis
There were total 25 items in the questionnaire. Out of these, 3 items were related to respondents’
profile. Out of the 22 remaining, 20 items belonged to examining the organization culture and
structure with 2 others for examining the drive of respondents in their respective companies. 3 items
on organization structure and culture were reverse coded.
7
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
The items were scaled on a five point scale. The details of items and scale are provided in Annexure
1 of this report. All the data was loaded on an excel sheet and items requiring reverse coding were
done so.
Further, mean analysis was carried out on the responses with regard to respondents’ motivation. The
respondents were divided into two groups, with mean score 4 or more and others with less than 4
mean score. For the analysis purpose, respondents with 4 or more as mean score are considered as
Motivated and other Not Motivated. Distribution of respondents among the above two categories
are tabulated below.
Respondents No of responses
With score more than 4 74
With score less than 4 56
Total 120
Further, scores of respondents were studied for the above two separately. The mean scores of
respondents were estimated for all items and these scores were then sorted in order. The reason for
this procedure was to understand the importance of various items for respondents.
8
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Chapter 3: Results
These results were also studied based on other categories i.e. managerial level and experience in the
industry of the respondents. The results are tabulated below for all classes -
Motivated Employees:
Scores of Motivated respondents were tabulated on two categories; management level and
experience in industry.
Management Level:
9
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
There was no respondent in Entry level found to have mean scores to be classified as
Driven.
Avg.
Senior Level Bottom 3 indicators
Score
My organization is diplomatic in how it handles all aspects of
Average of A 6 2.5
operations.
People at all levels of the organisation are continuously trying to
Average of A 25 2.3
build or rebuild a 'better mouse-trap'.
Average of A 15 1.8 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
Experience in Industry:
Scores of top 5 items of motivated employees with different experience bracket are as under –
Avg.
0-1 year Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
Average of A 4 4.5 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
My organization communicates effectively (written and verbal) and
Average of A 8 4.5
in a timely manner to their employees.
Average of A 10 4.5 My organization shares information with others who should know.
My organization recognizes and celebrates successes of team
Average of A 11 4.4
members.
My organization will promote from within before looking for
Average of A 16 4.2
employees externally.
Avg.
2-5 year Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
My organization recognizes and celebrates successes of team
Average of A 11 5.0
members.
10
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Average of A 4 4.6 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Average of A 5 4.6 Our organization is good at fulfilling their mission.
Average of A 9 4.6 My organization's culture follows the company's mission.
Average of A 10 4.6 My organization shares information with others who should know.
Avg
6-9 year Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
My organization communicates effectively (written and verbal) and
Average of A 8 4.6
in a timely manner to their employees.
My organization recognizes and celebrates successes of team
Average of A 11 4.4
members.
Average of A 4 4.3 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Average of A 10 4.2 My organization shares information with others who should know.
Average of A 19 4.1 Organisational policies are reviewed annually to assess effectiveness.
Avg
10- above Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
My organization communicates effectively (written and verbal) and
Average of A 8 4.8
in a timely manner to their employees.
Average of A 4 4.6 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Average of A 10 4.6 My organization shares information with others who should know.
Average of A 17 4.5 My organization's management team is diverse in nature.
My organization shows respect for a diverse range of opinions, ideas,
Average of A 12 4.4
and people.
Scores of bottom 3 items of motivated employees with different experience bracket are as under –
Avg
0-1 year Bottom 3 indicators
Score
"We've always done it that way" is a philosophy that describes my
Average of A 22 2.2
company's response to new ideas.
People at all levels of the organisation are continuously trying to
Average of A 25 2.0
build or rebuild a 'better mouse-trap'.
Average of A 15 1.5 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
Avg
2-5 year Bottom 3 indicators
Score
"We've always done it that way" is a philosophy that describes my
Average of A 22 2.8
company's response to new ideas.
My organization is diplomatic in how it handles all aspects of
Average of A 6 2.0
operations.
Average of A 15 2.0 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
11
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Avg.
6-9 year Bottom 3 indicators
Score
People at all levels of the organisation are continuously trying to
Average of A 25 3.0
build or rebuild a 'better mouse-trap'.
My organization is diplomatic in how it handles all aspects of
Average of A 6 2.5
operations.
Average of A 15 1.9 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
Avg.
10- above Bottom 3 indicators
Score
People at all levels of the organisation are continuously trying to
Average of A 25 2.7
build or rebuild a 'better mouse-trap'.
"We've always done it that way" is a philosophy that describes my
Average of A 22 2.6
company's response to new ideas.
Average of A 15 1.8 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
Non-Motivated Employees:
Scores of Non-Motivated respondents were tabulated on two categories; management level and
experience in industry.
Management Level:
12
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Scores of top 5 items of non-motivated employees in middle level are as under –
Avg.
Middle Level Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
Average of A 15 3.3 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
13
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Avg.
Middle Level Bottom 3 indicators
Score
My organization shows respect for a diverse range of opinions,
Average of A 12 1.8
ideas, and people.
Average of A 4 1.8 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Avg.
Senior Level Bottom 3 indicators
Score
Average of A 4 1.5 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Experience in Industry:
Scores of top 5 items of non-motivated employees with different experience bracket are as under –
Avg.
0-1 year Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
Average of A 17 3.4 My organization's management team is diverse in nature.
14
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Avg.
2-5 year Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
Average of A 15 3.4 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
Avg
6-9 year Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
Average of A 15 3.3 My organization's structure is hierarchal in nature.
Avg
10- above Top 5 motivation indicators
Score
My organization is diplomatic in how it handles all aspects of
Average of A 6 3.5
operations.
Average of A 25 2.5 People at all levels of the organisation are continuously trying to
15
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
build or rebuild a 'better mouse-trap'.
Scores of bottom 3 items of non-motivated employees with different experience bracket are as
under –
Avg
0-1 year Bottom 3 indicators
Score
Average of A 4 1.9 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Avg
2-5 year Bottom 3 indicators
Score
My organization shows respect for a diverse range of opinions, ideas,
Average of A 12 1.5
and people.
Average of A 4 1.4 My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
Avg.
6-9 year Bottom 3 indicators
Score
Average of A 23 2.0 My boss values new ideas and implements them quickly.
Average of A 23 1.5 My boss values new ideas and implements them quickly.
17
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Chapter 4: Discussion
1. It was surprising that none of the entry level respondent was found to be motivated enough.
2. The major areas which are found to be considered as important by the motivated people are
–
3. The major areas which are found to be considered as least important by the motivated
people are –
4. The major areas which are found to be considered as important by the non-motivated
people are –
My organization shows respect for a diverse range of opinions, ideas, and people.
My organization has a current mission plan for everyone to view.
In my organisation, change is viewed as a challenge and an opportunity.
5. The major areas which are found to be considered as least important by the non-motivated
people are –
18
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
As is seen from above, organization structure does not have much of importance either for motive
people or non-motivated people. It does not make any positive or negative impact on drive of
employees.
It is supported by the correlation between motivation mean scores and individual organizational
structure and culture scores. The most important factors on correlation matrix are as below –
19
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Appendix 1
3 How many years have you worked for your current organization? A3 Profile
20
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009
Performance evaluations in this organisation measure an Organization
24 A 24
employee's adaptation to change.
People at all levels of the organisation are continuously trying to
25 A 25 Organization
build or rebuild a 'better mouse-trap'.
Scale used:
A 5-point Likert scale was used for collecting responses from respondents.
Strongly disagree 1 5
Somewhat disagree 2 4
Somewhat Agree 4 2
Strongly Agree 5 1
21
Project Work: Research Methodology; October 2009