Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Ans:- The comparative cost theory was first systematically formulated by the English economist
David Ricardo in his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, published in 1817.1 It was
later refined by I.S. Mill, Marshall, Taussig and others.
In a nutshell, the doctrine of comparative costs maintains that if trade is left free, each country, in
the long run, tends to specialise in the production and export of those commodities in whose
production it enjoys a comparative advantage in terms of real costs, and to obtain by importation
those commodities which could be produced at home at a comparative disadvantage in terms of
real costs, and that such specialisation is to the mutual advantage of the countries participating in
it.
The theory of comparative costs was developed on the basis of the labor theory of value, and all
theorists who accepted it have indeed assumed that it rests also logically on the labor theory of
value. For the authors who reject the labor theory of value, the theory of comparative costs
foundes on the cliffs as the former, that is, on the fact that there simply exists no units of real
cost, neither in the shape of days of labor nor in any other shape… Fortunately, however, is
possible to reformulate the theory in such a way that its analytical value and all conclusions
drawn from it are preserved, rendering it at the same time entirely independent of the labor
theory of value. This may most readily be shown in a diagrammetic representation of our
theorem. (Gottfried Haberler, 1930)
It is well-known that the theory of comparative advantage, which trade economists proudly
consider to be “the deepest and most beautiful result in all of economics” (Findlay, 1987, p. 514),
orginated in David Ricardo’s famous passage of his Principles of Political Economy and
Taxation.1 It is less known that a milestone in the development of the much admired depth and
beauty of the theory was laid by Gottfried Haberler in a neglected 1930 article in the
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv.2 In that article Haberler freed the theory of comparative advantage
from Ricardo’s labor value formulation, provided us with the modern opportunity cost
formulation and laid the conceptual foundation of modern trade theory.
Applying the theory of comparative costs in the real world has a few limitations.
Firstly, the theory is based on an incorrect assumption that wages between industries do not
vary. Construction and manufacturing workers are often paid much more than retail workers.
Even workers with same skills may receive different wages in different sectors of the economy.
For example, a secretary in a car manufacturing company will most likely earn more than one in
a public school. So workers moving from high wage sector jobs to low wage sector jobs are hurt
if an economy specializes in the latter.
Secondly, the nature and structure of certain industries may be such that the benefits from trade
may accrue only to very few workers (owners and managers of banana plantations) whereas the
majority of workers (agricultural labourers) may actually be worse off despite aggregate gains
from trade. The welfare consequences of trade for most of the people in such an economy will be
negative.
Thirdly, different goods have different elasticities of demand. In tough economic times when
global demand may be falling, an economy specializing in producing jewelry, for instance, may
find it difficult to trade its products to raise enough money to import food. Some degree of self-
reliance in producing essential commodities for the local economy may be preferable to free
trade if maintaining economic security and stability is a policy preference.
Q.2 What are the different market entry strategies for a company which is interested to
enter International markets? Discuss briefly.
Ans:- Companies enter international markets for varying reasons, and these different objectives
at the time of entry should produce different strategies, performance goals, and even forms of
market participation. Yet, companies frequently follow a standard market entry and development
strategy. The most common, which will be described in the following section, is sometimes
referred to as the “increasing commitment” pattern of market penetration, in which market entry
is via an independent local distributor or partner with a later switch to a directly controlled
subsidiary. This approach results from an objective of building a business in the country-market
as quickly as possible but nevertheless with a degree of patience produced by the initial desire to
minimize risk and by the need to learn about the country and market from a low base of
knowledge. These might be described as straightforward financial objectives that are oriented
around long-run profit maximization in the country, so this internationalization strategy could be
described as the default option.
The fundamental reason for entering a new market has to be potential demand, of course, but
nevertheless it is common to observe other factors driving investment and performance
measurement decisions, such as:
Stages in the International Involvement of a Firm. We discussed several stages through which
a firm may go as it becomes increasingly involved across borders. A purely domestic firm
focuses only on its home market, has no current ambitions of expanding abroad, and does not
perceive any significant competitive threat from abroad. Such a firm may eventually get some
orders from abroad, which are seen either as an irritation (for small orders, there may be a great
deal of effort and cost involved in obtaining relatively modest revenue) or as "icing on the cake."
As the firm begins to export more, it enters the export stage, where little effort is made to market
the product abroad, although an increasing number of foreign orders are filled. In the
international stage, as certain country markets begin to appear especially attractive with more
foreign orders originating there, the firm may go into countries on an ad hoc basis—that is, each
country may be entered sequentially, but with relatively little learning and marketing efforts
being shared across countries. In the multi-national stage, some efficiencies are pursued by
standardizing across a region (e.g., Central America, West Africa, or Northern Europe). Finally,
in the global stage, the focus centers on the entire World market, with decisions made optimize
the product’s position across markets—the home country is no longer the center of the product.
An example of a truly global company is Coca Cola.
Note that these stages represent points on a continuum from a purely domestic orientation to a
truly global one; companies may fall in between these discrete stages, and different parts of the
firm may have characteristics of various stages—for example, the pickup truck division of an
auto-manufacturer may be largely domestically focused, while the passenger car division is
globally focused. Although a global focus is generally appropriate for most large firms, note that
it may not be ideal for all companies to pursue the global stage. For example, manufacturers of
ice cubes may do well as domestic, or even locally centered, firms.
Some forces in international trade. The text contains a rather long-winded appendix discussing
some relatively simple ideas. Comparative advantage, discussed in more detail in the economics
notes, suggests trade between countries is beneficial because these countries differ in their
relative economic strengths—some have more advanced technology and some have lower costs.
The International Product Life Cycle suggests that countries will differ in their timing of the
demand for various products. Products tend to be adopted more quickly in the United States and
Japan, for example, so once the demand for a product (say, VCRs) is in the decline in these
markets, an increasing market potential might exist in other countries (e.g., Europe and the rest
of Asia). Internalization/transaction costs refers to the fact that developing certain very large
scale projects, such as an automobile intended for the World market, may entail such large costs
that these must be spread over several countries.
Learning in Lead Markets: In some circumstances, a company might undertake a foreign
market entry not for solely financial reasons, but to learn. For example, the white goods division
of Koc, the Turkish conglomerate, entered Germany, regarded as the world’s leading market for
dishwashers, refrigerators, freezers, and washing machines both in terms of consumer
sophistication and product specification. In doing so, it recognized that its unknown brand would
struggle to gain much market share in this fiercely competitive market. However, Koc took the
view that, as an aspiring global company, it would undoubtedly benefit from participating in the
world’s lead market and that its own product design and marketing would improve and enable it
to perform better around the world.4 In most sectors, participation in the “lead market” would be
a prerequisite for qualifying as a global leader, even if profits in that lead market were low. The
lead market will vary by sector: the United States for software, Japan for consumer electronics
and telecommunications, France or Italy for fashion, and so on.
The important point about such an objective for market entry is that it will change the calculus of
the market entry mode decision. If a company is to maximize learning from a lead market, for
example, it will need to participate with its own subsidiary and a cadre of its own executives.
Learning indirectly, via a local distributor or other partner, is obviously less effective and will
contribute less to the company’s development as a global player, even if short-term profitability
is superior because of the lower investment required.
Competitive Attack or Defense : In some situations, market entry is prompted not by some
attractive characteristics of the country identified in a market assessment exercise, but as a
reaction to a competitor’s move. The most common scenario is market entry as a follower move,
when a company enters the market simply because a major competitor has done so. This is
obviously driven by the belief that the competitor would gain a significant advantage if it were
allowed to operate alone in that market, and so it is most common in concentrated or even
duopolistic industries. Another frequent scenario is “offense as defense,” in which a company
enters the home market of a competitor—usually in retaliation for an earlier entry into its own
domestic market. In this case, the objective is also to force the competitor to allocate increased
resources to an intensified level of competition. In both cases, a company will have to adapt its
strategies to the particular strategic stakes: rather than focusing on market development, the firm
will set market share objectives and be prepared to accept lower levels of profitability and higher
levels of marketing expenditure. This requires different performance standards and budgets from
the usual scenario of low-risk entry and long-run development, and the company’s control
system must have sufficient flexibility to adapt to this. The overriding competitive objective
should also be taken into account when considering whether and how to participate in the market
with a local distributor or partner. Certainly, the low-intensity entry modes, such as import
agents and trading houses, would be inappropriate unless the local partner will accept the lower
profit expectations.
Scale Economics or Marketing Leverage : A number of objectives result from
internationalization undertaken as what is sometimes described as a “replication strategy,” in
which a company seeks a larger market arena in which to exploit an advantage. In many
manufacturing industries, for example, internationalization can help the company achieve greater
economies of scale, particularly for companies from smaller domestic country-markets. In other
cases, a company may seek to exploit a distinctive and differentiating asset (often protected as
intellectual property), such as a brand, service model, or patented product. In both cases, the
emphasis is on “more of the same,” with relatively little adaptation to local markets, which
would undermine scale economies or diminish the returns from replication of the winning model.
To achieve either of these objectives, a company must retain some control, so it may enter
markets with relatively high-intensity modes, such as joint ventures. In particular, either
franchising or licensing are business models naturally suited for the rapid replication of
businesses through expansion of units since both are centered on protected and predefined assets.
Apart from these varied marketing objectives, it is also common for governments to
“incentivize” their country’s companies to export, in which case the company may enter markets
it would otherwise not have tackled. In summary, given the rapid business evolution that has
been identified as one of the distinctive characteristics of international markets, it is reasonable
to suppose that, for most companies, international operations will consist of a patchwork of
country-market operations that are pursuing different objectives at any one time. This, in turn,
would suggest that most companies would adopt different entry modes for different markets.
More commonly, however, companies have a template that is followed in almost all markets.
This usually starts with market entry via an indirect distribution channel, usually a local
independent distributor or agent.
The purpose of OPEC is to restrict the amount of oil produced. By doing so, OPEC can make
sure that it receives a high price for its oil by only selling at the quantity where marginal cost
equals marginal revenue. Restricting the quantity of output drives up the price, allowing OPEC
to set the quantity that maximizes its profits.
In economic terms, OPEC is a cartel. This means that its members come together to form an
organization that is basically a monopoly. OPEC's member countries currently hold about 2/3 of
the known oil reserves in the world.
One major difficulty faced by all cartels is restricting production among members. OPEC has
been plagued by this historically, as members "cheat" by selling more than they are allowed to at
the inflated price. Maintaining a cartel is difficult because it is in the short-term interests of
every member to cheat.
The other major problem faced by cartels such as OPEC is preventing non-members from
entering the market. OPEC has never included every oil-producing nation in the world, so there
have always been countries that have sold as much as they have wanted, taking advantage of the
high price made possible by the sacrifices of OPEC member states.
In 1973, OPEC began restricting oil production among its members. Prices rose greatly, and all
the members nations benefited. Ultimately, the price rose to US$35 per barrel in 1981. Changes
in prices, as well as wars and political issues, caused supply shocks in oil. This meant that oil
was suddenly unavailable, creating major problems in economies worldwide.
However, the high price discouraged use of oil and increased the inclination of other countries to
begin producing what oil they could. In addition, research into renewable energy took off,
motivated by the economic pain caused by oil prices and oil shocks.
The high price also caused many OPEC nations to cheat, raising production levels to boost
profits. In 1984 Saudi Arabia demanded its fellow members to quit cheating. It was too difficult
to continue running OPEC though, and in December 1985, the organization eliminated
production restrictions, basically giving up.
Culture in international business therefore comprises of various practices, cultural influences and
different ways in which people think. Some of the factors which influence international
businesses based on different cultural practices are, how various people do communicate when
making business negotiations, the manner in which they engage in the business and also how
they spend their The use of body language explains the mannerism in business which looks at
how people use different gestures and the behaviors the gestures reflect to the other partner. A
sign to show good will in one country could be mean something very different from that in
another. Particularly in business, some of the gestures used by people like laughter or
uncomfortable smile, could cost ones business loss of huge amounts of money when may be a
deal is broken due to misunderstanding when certain gestures are used to mean some thing else
which to them is positive and to the other partner could be irritating. Shaking of head to some
people means that they are listening but to others, it is a sign of disagreeing with some
statements, so in case of business transaction such events could lead to misunderstanding
In broad terms, the social-cultural environment includes everything that is not included in the
economy or the political system. Economic life is organized primarily through a market in which
individuals relate to one another as buyers and sellers and the purpose is production. In political
life individuals relate to one another as citizens and the basic purpose is making collective
decisions and rules. The economic and political systems together create the conditions—goods,
ervices and rules—which we all need in order to live the kinds of lives that we choose. The
socialcultural environment, then, consists of the whole range of behaviours and relationships in
which individuals engage in their personal and private lives, including:
• The characteristics of the population (e.g. age, sex, race or ethnicity, class)
• Walues and attitudes
• Lifestyles and relationships.
Culture is an attribute of groups, and this can mean society as a whole (e.g. national culture),
groups within society (sub-cultures), or even groups of societies and nations (trans-national
culture).
For example, it is quite common to speak of ‘western culture’. This term implies that there are
certain values and ways of life that western societies might be said to share, such as:
• Secularism—this refers to the increasing influence of rational and scientific thought, and
the decline of religion as a framework of understanding and guide to behaviour.
• Consumerism or materialism—this refers to the view that achieving higher levels of
consumption of goods and services leads to greater happiness. A good life means having
more ‘stuff ’. This attitude lies behind the belief that economic growth is always a good
thing.
• Individualism—this usually refers to the idea that individuals make their own life-style
choices and are motivated primarily by self-interest. It can also involve the idea that
individuals should strive to be self-reliant.
However these attitudes or values vary in strength between western societies (e.g. UK society is
more secular than the United States), and they also have their own distinctive cultural traits. For
example, ‘Britishness’ might be said to include (among other traits):
The very idea of Britishness is contested by some on the grounds that British society contains a
diverse range of cultures. For example, Britain is often described as a ‘multicultural’ society,
eferring to the co-existence of different communities defined by their race, ethnicity or faith.
Sub-cultures can also be related to class membership (e.g. working class culture) or age (e.g.
youth culture). Youth culture is, of course, itself diverse, partly reflecting lifestyle choices in
relation to clothing and music.
• It can be argued that capitalist business owes its historical origins and development in
part to non-economic factors. Max Weber argued that the ‘spirit of capitalism’, or ethos
of capitalist business, with its emphasis on accumulating wealth, can be traced to
religious belief—the ‘Protestant ethic’. This religious belief encouraged the reinvestment
of wealth in business rather than the pursuit of a life of luxury, thus fuelling economic
growth and dynamism (Giddens, 2006: 103–4). A version of this theory persists today in
the idea that economic success depends on the prevalence of a ‘work ethic’ in society
which sees work as a morally desirable activity. We can perhaps see this reflected in the
welfare-to-work initiatives of the Labour governments since 1997 with their emphasis on
seeking and accepting employment as a moral responsibility.
• Some writers have argued that the UK’s relatively poor long-term economic performance
has been due in part to wider cultural factors such as an emphasis on the arts rather than
science, engineering and technology and a weak entrepreneurial culture. The basic idea
here is that societies that prize business and entrepreneurship are more likely to be
economically successful. Since the 1980s both Conservative and Labour governments
have attempted to make the wider culture and society of the UK more supportive of
business. For example, the opportunity for members of the public to buy shares in
privatized industries in the 1980s was intended, in part, to create a ‘share-owning
democracy’. Owning shares would, it was thought, give people a stake in business and
foster a more positive attitude towards it. Other important areas of policy have included
encouraging business start-ups and a stronger emphasis on vocational education.
• An important process of social change in western societies has been the declining
influence of racist and sexist attitudes and behaviours, though these problems have not
gone away. Equal opportunities legislation, such as the Sex Discrimination and Race
Relations Acts in the UK in the 1970s, both reflected and promoted these shifting
attitudes. These laws prohibit discrimination in the offer of employment on grounds of
the sex or race of the applicants. The need for these laws reflects the way social attitudes
permeate business. In other words, if sexist attitudes are prevalent in the wider society it
is likely that they will also show up in the business arena. This influence is all the more
striking since, on the face of it, discrimination is irrational in terms of the ‘bottom line’.
In other words, sexism is bad for business).
• In economics textbooks consumers are often portrayed (like businesses) as ‘rational
maximizers’, meaning that they allocate their spending so as to maximize their personal
self-interest. Yet this view seems to be at odds with the growth of ‘ethical consumerism’
Here consumers are willing to trade-off their own interests against thos of others by, for
example, paying more for fair trade products to ensure a better deal for producers in
‘Third World’ countries. This is a prime example of consumer behaviour, and therefore
the behaviour of business in response, being shaped by shifts in the values of the wider
society—in this case towards a greater concern for Third World poverty. It can be argued
that the increasing emphasis on corporate social responsibility also reflects the way in
which business leaders have been influenced by shifting social attitudes and values
The underlying idea and the conceptual origin of the WTO goes back to World War II. The
leaders of the allied powers were of the view that one of the main causes of the war was the
failure of the open world trading system in the 1930s. They agreed that the enduring peace and
welfare of nations were inextricably connected with mutual friendly relations, fairness, equality,
and the maximum predictable degree of freedom in international trade.
Soon after the war ended, preparations for creating a new international economic order
commenced. One of the important pillars of this new order, embodied in the Bretton Woods
Institutions, was the establishment of the International Trade
Organization (ITO), along with the International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (The World Bank).
The United Nations Economic and Social Council decided in early 1946 to hold an international
conference to draft the charter of the ITO. It established for that purpose a preparatory committee
that held its first meeting in London in October of the same year. After further preparatory
meetings, the UN Conference on Trade and Employment was held in Havana, from November
1947 to March 1948. The end result of this conference was the Havana Charter, which contained
theo bjectives, principles, rules, and institutional setup of an International Trade Organization.
The Havana Charter was signed on March 24, 1948 by representatives of 54 countries.
In tandem with the preparations for the ITO charter, some 23 members of the preparatory
committee carried out negotiations for the reduction of tariffs, which at that time were the main
obstacle to international trade. In order to implement and secure the results of tariff reductions in
advance of the ITO, it was decided by the 23 countries to establish an interim agreement.
Accordingly, they agreed on a General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade that was based on the
chapters on trade policy in the draft charter of the ITO.1The results of tariff negotiations were
inscribed in country schedules annexed to the text of the GATT and became an integral part of it.
The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade was signed by 23 countries on October 30, 1947
and entered into force on January 1, 1948. It was a provisional agreement without an institutional
setup because it was envisaged that it would be taken over by the ITO.
The Havana Charter never entered into force because it was not ratified by the US Congress.
Thus, the GATT remained the only legal framework of rules for the conduct of world trade for
almost half a century. However, the GATT regulated only trade in goods. It did not cover
services or investments. Over the years, the GATT ensured liberalization of world trade through
the elimination or reduction of tariffs and other barriers to merchandise trade. It was responsible
for the manifold expansion of international trade. The greatest achievement of the GATT was
establishing its role as a rules-based system for the conduct of trade relations among nations,
which averted further 1930s-like economic depressions.
However, the GATT also had its failings. GATT rules never fully applied to agriculture, and its
basic principles and some of its main rules were rendered largely inoperative in the case of
textiles and clothing.The GATT also lagged behind new developments in international trade.
Initially, its rules applied to trade in goods only.Trade in services, which had grown rapidly and
had become an important and dynamic element of international trade, was not subject to GATT
rules.
When the Uruguay Round negotiations started in 1986, it was not envisaged that a new
organization would be established to implement the results of the negotiations. However, as the
negotiations developed and growth intwo new areas, services and intellectual property, became
increasingly visible, the countries taking part in the Uruguay Round started focusing on the need
for establishing a permanent institutional setup to implement and jadminister the results of the
negotiations. It was agreed that an umbrella organization was needed to house the outcome of
negotiations in goods, services, and trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights, and to
implement the 20 or so agreements and legal texts negotiated and accepted as a single
undertaking.
The charter of the World Trade Organization was elaborated during the last several years of the
Uruguay Round negotiations. It was formalized in the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the
World Trade Organization, signed in Marrakesh on April 15, 1994. After necessary ratification,
the agreement entered into force on January 1, 1995.
The basic principles of the WTO are built on those of the GATT. Relatively few and simple, they
are far reaching in importance, and have been the guiding light for the past 50 years and should
continue to illuminate the path of the multilateral trading system well into the new millennium.
These basic principles are discussed below.
b. National treatment : The principle of national treatment implies that imported goods
and services and foreign service suppliers will be given treatment that is no less favorable
than that given to domestic goods and services and to domestic service suppliers. The
principle is observed by giving either the same treatment or more favorable treatment to
imported goods and services and to foreign service suppliers as that given to domestic
goods and services and to domestic servicesuppliers.
c. Stability and predictability: The stability and predictability of trading conditions is
another basic principle of the WTO. Stable and predictable conditions of access to
markets promote confidence because investors and traders can plan their investments
secure in the knowledge that market access conditions will not change for the worse. This
is achieved through the binding of tariffs and conditions of market access for services.
e. Trade liberalization : As mentioned earlier, the WTO is not an organization for free
trade, sinc it does allow protection. However, one of the principles of the WTO is
progressive liberalization of trade in goods and services. This principle is rooted in the
belief that the removal or reduction of trade barriers results in an expansion of
international trade that is to the benefit of all countries. To achieve progressive
liberalization, the WTO provides a forum for trade negotiations and a framework for
implementing the results of such negotiations.
f. Fair competition: One of the basic principles of the WTO is fair competition in
international trade. The rules on MFN treatment and national treatment are designed to
promote fair competition. WTO rules also contain disincentives or remedies against
unfair competition, such as dumping or subsidization that causes injury to domestic
industries.
g. Economic development: Last, but not least, is the principle of economic development
of developing countries. There are many provisions in different WTO agreements
designed to promote economic development of developing countries and to encourage
economic reforms both in developing countries and in transition economies.
Floating Exchange Rate : The floating exchange rate is a market-driven price for currency,
whereby the exchange rate is determined entirely by the free market forces of demand and
supply of currencies with no government intervention whatsoever.
Broadly, the floating exchange rate regime consists of the independent floating system and the
managed floating system. The former is where exchange rate is strictly determined by the free
movement of demand and supply. For managed floating system, exchange rate is also
determined by free movement of demand and supply but the monetary authorities intervene at
certain times to "manage" the exchange rate to prevent high volatilities.
Pros & Cons of Floating Exchange Rate
The floating exchange rate boasts various merits. Firstly, there is automatic correction in the
floating exchange rate as the country simply lets it move freely to the equilibrium of demand and
supply. Secondly, there is insulation from external economic events as the country's currency is
not tied to a possibly high world inflation rate as is under a fixed exchange rate. The free
movement of demand and supply helps to insulate the domestic economy from world economic
fluctuations. Thirdly, governments are free to choose their domestic policy as a floating
exchange rate would allow for automatic correction of any balance of payment disequilibrium
that might arise from the implementation of domestic policy.
Nonetheless, there are also specific concerns about the exchange rate being unstable and
uncertain under the floating exchange rate regime. Also, speculation tends to be higher in the
floating exchange rate regime, hence leading to more uncertainty especially for traders and
investors.
Fixed Exchange Rate : For a fixed exchange rate, the government is unwilling to let the
country's currency float freely, and they state a level at which the exchange rate will stay. The
government takes whatever measures that are necessary to maintain the rate and prevent it from
fluctuating. There are two methods which exchange rate could be applied to the price of
currencies, a fixed exchange rate and a pegged exchange rate.
Under the fixed exchange rate system, a decrease in the exchange rate which is infrequent are
called revaluations. While an increase in the exchange rate are called devaluations. A
devaluation in a fixed exchange rate will cause the current account balance to rise, making a
country's export less expensive for foreigners and also discourage import by making import
products more expensive for domestic consumers,. This will leads to an increase in trade surplus
or a decrease in trade deficit. The opposite happens in a revaluation
However, a fixed exchange rate contradicts the objective of having free markets and it is not able
to adjust to shocks swiftly like the floating exchange rate.
Q. 6. Discuss the need for HRM Strategies and International employee relations strategies
in International business.
Ans:- Human resource management refers to the activities an organization carries out to use its
human resources effectively . These activities include determining the firm 's human resource
strategy , staffing , performance evaluation , management development , compensation , and
labor relations . None of these activities is performed in a vacuum all are related to the strategy
of the firm because , as we will see , HRM has an important strategic component . Through its
influence on the character , development , quality , and productivity of the firm 's human
resources , the HRM function can help the firm achieve its primary strategic goals of reducing
the costs of value creation and adding value by better serving customer needs .
The strategic role of HRM is complex enough in a purely domestic firm , but it is more complex
in an international business , where staffing , management development , performance evaluation
, and compensation activities are complicated by profound differences between countries in
labor markets , culture , legal systems , economic systems , and the like .
Human resources managers are a business organisations ‘people’ managers, responsible for
managing a wide range of employee responsibilities. The human resource manager in a multi-
national company with divisions or subsidiaries in foreign countries has all the normal HR
responsibilities plus a brace of additional tasks that are specific to offshore operations of his
department. He is literally responsible for international human resource management.
International human resource management functions cover many different activities related to a
business organization’s employees and contractors. The first and most important is the staffing
needs of the company whether staff members are company employees or outside contractors.
Other functions include recruiting and training employees, ensuring that they are performing at
expected levels or better, handling performance issues and making certain that personnel and
management policies conform to laws and regulations. IHR management is also involved in how
the company manages employee compensation and benefits, employee records and personnel
policies and practices. (hr-guide.com, 2007).
The primary difference between domestic human resource management and international human
resource management is the added knowledge and responsibilities required due to foreign
operations. These typically include language (in non-English speaking offshore organisations),
the local and national regulations and laws governing business operations within a foreign
country; currency exchange rates, career outlooks, company benefits and incentives and, perhaps
most important. The ethics and etiquette expectations of foreign business contacts. IHR
management people must understand these differences clearly and stand ready to keep other
company people informed of them to prevent embarrassing situations and unintentional
‘affronts’ from occurring
Basic human resources are a management activity while human resources development is
considered a profession. The latter is targeted more specifically to developing personnel inside
organisations through career development, organizational development and training activities.
Both functions have undergone very-significant evolutions during the past several decades so
that they now play major roles in staffing, managing and training people so that the will perform
in an optimum manner for the organisation. Today, international human resource management is
the fastest-growing subset of HR due to the growing trend for global business operations.
Still other international human resource management activities include ensuring workplace
safety through dealing with drugs and drug problems, employee assistance, ergonomics,
spirituality and diversity. In these efforts multiple sets of regulations must be used as guidelines;
those of the company and those arising from being in a foreign nation with different laws,
regulations and etiquettes. (managementhelp.org, 2007).
PROMOTIONAL ISSUES
Promotional objectives. Promotional objectives involve the question of what the firm hopes to
achieve with a campaign—“increasing profits” is too vague an objective, since this has to be
achieved through some intermediate outcome (such as increasing market share, which in turn is
achieved by some change in consumers which cause them to buy more). Some common
objectives that firms may hold:
Awareness. Many French consumers do not know that the Gap even exists, so they cannot
decide to go shopping there. This objective is often achieved through advertising, but could also
be achieved through favorable point-of-purchase displays. Note that since advertising and
promotional stimuli are often afforded very little attention by consumers, potential buyers may
have to be exposed to the promotional stimulus numerous times before it “registers.” Trial.
Even when consumers know that a product exists and could possibly satisfy some of their
desires, it may take a while before they get around to trying the product—especially when there
are so many other products that compete for their attention and wallets. Thus, the next step is
often to try get consumer to try the product at least once, with the hope that they will make repeat
purchases. Coupons are often an effective way of achieving trial, but these are illegal in some
countries and in some others, the infrastructure to readily accept coupons (e.g., clearing houses)
does not exist. Continued advertising and point-of-purchase displays may be effective.
Although Coca Cola is widely known in China, a large part of the population has not yet tried the
product. Attitude toward the product. A high percentage of people in the U.S. and Europe has
tried Coca Cola, so a more reasonable objective is to get people to believe positive things about
the product—e.g., that it has a superior taste and is better than generics or store brands. This is
often achieved through advertising. Temporary sales increases. For mature products and
categories, attitudes may be fairly well established and not subject to cost-effective change.
Thus, it may be more useful to work on getting temporary increases in sales (which are likely to
go away the incentives are removed). In the U.S. and Japan, for example, fast food restaurants
may run temporary price promotions to get people to eat out more or switch from competitors,
but when these promotions end, sales are likely to move back down again (in developing
countries, in contrast, trial may be a more appropriate objective in this category).
Legal issues. Countries differ in their regulations of advertising, and some products are banned
from advertising on certain media (large supermarket chains are not allowed to advertise on TV
in France, for example). Other forms of promotion may also be banned or regulated. In some
European countries, for example, it is illegal to price discriminate between consumers, and thus
coupons are banned and in some, it is illegal to offer products on sale outside a very narrow
seasonal and percentage range.
Language issues. Language is an important element of culture. It should be realized that
regional differences may be subtle. For example, one word may mean one thing in one Latin
American country, but something off-color in another. It should also be kept in mind that much
information is carried in non-verbal communication. In some cultures, we nod to signify “yes”
and shake our heads to signify “no;” in other cultures, the practice is reversed. Within the
context of language:
There are often large variations in regional dialects of a given language. The differences
between U.S., Australian, and British English are actually modest compared to differences
between dialects of Spanish and German. Idioms involve “figures of speech” that may not be
used, literally translated, in other languages. For example, baseball is a predominantly North and
South American sport, so the notion of “in the ball park” makes sense here, but the term does not
carry the same meaning in cultures where the sport is less popular. Neologisms involve terms
that have come into language relatively recently as technology or society involved. With the
proliferation of computer technology, for example, the idea of an “add-on” became widely
known. It may take longer for such terms to “diffuse” into other regions of the world. In parts of
the World where English is heavily studied in schools, the emphasis is often on grammar and
traditional language rather than on current terminology, so neologisms have a wide potential not
to be understood. Slang exists within most languages. Again, regional variations are common
and not all people in a region where slang is used will necessarily understand this. There are
often significant generation gaps in the use of slang.
Writing patterns, or the socially accepted ways of writing, will differs significantly between
cultures.
Pricing Issues in International Marketing
Price can best be defined in ratio terms, giving the equation
resources given up
price = ———————————————
goods received
This implies that there are several ways that the price can be changed:
“Sticker” price changes—the most obvious way to change the price is the price tag— you get the
same thing, but for a different (usually larger) amount of money. Change quantity. Often,
consumers respond unfavorably to an increased sticker price, and changes in quantity are
sometimes noticed less—e.g., in the 1970s, the wholesale cost of chocolate increased
dramatically, and candy manufacturers responded by making smaller candy bars. Note that, for
cash flow reasons, consumers in less affluent countries may need to buy smaller packages at any
one time (e.g., forking out the money for a large tube of toothpaste is no big deal for most
American families, but it introduces a greater strain on the budget of a family closer to the
subsistence level). Change quality. Another way candy manufacturers have effectively increased
prices is through a reduction in quality. In a candy bar, the “gooey” stuff is much cheaper than
chocolate. It is frequently tempting for foreign licensees of a major brand name to use inferior
ingredients. Change terms. In the old days, most software manufacturers provided free support
for their programs—it used to be possible to call the WordPerfect Corporation on an 800 number
to get free help. Nowadays, you either have to call a 900 number or have a credit card handy to
get help from many software makers. Another way to change terms is to do away with favorable
financing terms.
Reference Prices. Consumers often develop internal reference prices, or expectations about
what something should cost, based mostly on their experience. Most drivers with long commutes
develop a good feeling of what gasoline should cost, and can tell a bargain or a ripoff.
Reference prices are more likely to be more precise for frequently purchased and highly visible
products. Therefore, retailers very often promote soft drinks, since consumers tend to have a
good idea of prices and these products are quite visible. The trick, then, is to be more expensive
on products where price expectations are muddier.
Marketers often try to influence people’s price perceptions through the use of external reference
prices—indicators given to the consumer as to how much something should cost. Examples
include:
Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). This is often pure fiction. The suggested retail
prices in certain categories are deliberately set so high that even full service retailers can sell at a
“discount.” Thus, although the consumer may contrast the offering price against the MSRP, this
latter figure is quite misleading. “SALE! Now $2.99; Regular Price $5.00.” For this strategy to
be used legally in most countries, the claim must be true (consistency of enforcement in some
countries is, of course, another matter). However, certain products are put on sale so frequently
that the “regular” price is meaningless. In the early 1990s, Sears was reported to sell some 55%
of its merchandise on sale. “WAS $10.00, now $6.99.” “Sold elsewhere for $150.00; our price:
$99.99
CULTURE OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
Culture is part of the external influences that impact the consumer. That is, culture represents
influences that are imposed on the consumer by other individuals.
The definition of culture offered one text is “That complex whole which includes knowledge,
belief, art, morals, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man person as a
member of society.” From this definition, we make the following observations:
Culture, as a “complex whole,” is a system of interdependent components. Knowledge and
beliefs are important parts. In the U.S., we know and believe that a person who is skilled and
works hard will get ahead. In other countries, it may be believed that differences in outcome
result more from luck. “Chunking,” the name for China in Chinese, literally means “The Middle
Kingdom.” The belief among ancient Chinese that they were in the center of the universe greatly
influenced their thinking. Other issues are relevant. Art, for example, may be reflected in the
rather arbitrary practice of wearing ties in some countries and wearing turbans in others.
Morality may be exhibited in the view in the United States that one should not be naked in
public. In Japan, on the other hand, groups of men and women may take steam baths together
without perceived as improper. On the other extreme, women in some Arab countries are not
even allowed to reveal their faces. Notice, by the way, that what at least some countries view as
moral may in fact be highly immoral by the standards of another country.
Culture has several important characteristics:
• Culture is comprehensive. This means that all parts must fit together in some logical
fashion. For example, bowing and a strong desire to avoid the loss of face are unified in
their manifestation of the importance of respect.
• Culture is learned rather than being something we are born with. We will consider the
mechanics of learning later in the course.
• Culture is manifested within boundaries of acceptable behavior. For example, in
American society, one cannot show up to class naked, but wearing anything from a suit
and tie to shorts and a T-shirt would usually be acceptable. Failure to behave within the
prescribed norms may lead to sanctions, ranging from being hauled off by the police for
indecent exposure to being laughed at by others for wearing a suit at the beach.
• Conscious awareness of cultural standards is limited. One American spy was intercepted
by the Germans during World War II simply because of the way he held his knife and
fork while eating.
• Cultures fall somewhere on a continuum between static and dynamic depending on how
quickly they accept change. For example, American culture has changed a great deal
since the 1950s, while the culture of Saudi Arabia has changed much less.
CONCLUSION
If the exporting departments are becoming successful but the costs of doing business from
headquarters plus time differences, language barriers, and cultural ignorance are hindering the
company’s competitiveness in the foreign market, then offices could be built in the foreign
countries. Sometimes companies buy firms in the foreign countries to take advantage of
relationships, storefronts, factories, and personnel already in place. These offices still report to
headquarters in the home market but most of the marketing mix decisions are made in the
individual countries since that staff is the most knowledgeable about the target markets. Local
product development is based on the needs of local customers. These marketers are considered
polycentric because they acknowledge that each market/country has different needs.
Q.2 a. Why do you think International quality standards are essential in International
business?
Ans:-Importance of quality and the need for continuous improvement in all sectors, covering
manufacturing and service; health; education; the Government sector; the non-profit sector of the
various associations, and voluntary organizations, etc. striving to promote quality, continuous
improvement, and organizational excellence.
In a global economy where success depends on quality, innovation and sustainability, National
Quality Week is an opportunity to reinforce these as the foundations of any organization and
focus on the importance of Quality.
Quality movement’s origins can be traced back to W. Edward Deming, Joseph M. Juran and
Philip B. Crosby, and even further back, to Frederick Taylor in the 1920s.
Taylor is the “father of scientific management.” As manufacturing moved into larger plants,
between the 1920s and the 1950s, the terms and processes of quality control developed.
During this time productivity was emphasized and quality was checked at the end of the line. As
industrial plants became larger, post-production checks became more difficult and statistical
methods began to be used to control quality.
After World War 11, with its industries in ruin, Japan to reconstruct its economy, the Japanese
set out in earnest to improve quality and as a result in the year 1950, they sought the help of
American advisors, notably Drs Deming and Juran.
Japanese senior managers started to master total quality control and they began to integrate
broader management principles of quality values throughout all business activities.
The strategies used involved high-level managers as leaders, all levels and functions were trained
in managing for quality, continuous progress was undertaken, quality circles were used, and the
entire workforce was enlisted.
As a result of this approach, Japanese quality caught up with that of the West in the 1970s, as
improved Japanese products flooded the marketplace.
This lesson has not gone unnoticed as United States and Western countries started to use
“Quality” as part of their organizations and country’s top agenda. It took twenty years of
concerted effort to revamp Japan’s industrial system. With growing global competition,
“Quality” is becoming increasingly important to all organizations as rapid evolution in markets is
fueled by changing customer needs.
In the future the customer and not the manufacturer would define quality. The whole workforce
from the CEO to the line worker must be involved in a shared commitment to improving quality
of products or services of any organization.
In other words, it is an integration of all functions of a business to achieve high quality of
products or service through continuous improvement efforts of all employees. It involves every
aspect of the company: processes, environment and people.
Quality revolves around the concept of meeting or exceeding customer expectation applied to the
product and service. Achieving high quality is an ever changing, or continuous, process therefore
quality management emphasizes the ideas of working constantly toward improved quality.
If your product and service quality is not consistent with the market requirements you may lose
customers, thereby losing sales and having difficulty in building or recovering your brand image.
Quality is considered to be one of the management’s important priorities in any organization in
view of the stiff competition taking place in the local and international markets. It is an accepted
fact that managing quality right throughout the organization is essential for any organization
success and growth.
Managing “Quality” is not an easy task due to the diversity of customer needs and requirements
taking place in the ever changing markets. As such organizations need to understand the basis of
quality management, including quality control and assurance, in manufacturing and service
businesses. Maintaining quality isn’t enough.
It is important to have a continuous quality improvement program integrated with the strategic
business plan to make any organization a successful one.
Over the years, to help the organizations to go in this direction many important concepts coupled
with management have been introduced to world.
Those well-known systems are ISO 9001, Total Quality Management (TQM), Baldrige Award,
Six sigma, Lean Manufacturing and Toyota Way and these concepts and tools are practiced by
many organizations in Sri Lanka.
In fact, the Sri Lanka Standards Institution has introduced the Sri Lanka National Quality
Awards (SLNQA) in line with the Baldrige to pass the benefits to local organizations. However,
the successful implementation of the above models relies on the Implementers’ knowledge and
understanding of the concepts and the application of the concepts considering the unique
situation of the organization.
Since the approach of all above models is process-oriented management, it is worthwhile to
indicate that if any of the above models are practiced in the right manner within any organization
those organizations are in the direction of results-oriented management.
But to apply sound quality management, the producer requires full support from many
specialized fields such as standards, calibration, training, testing, and certification and
accreditation.
Standardization
Standards are documents approved by a recognized body, that provides, for common and
repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for products or related processes and production
methods, and related management system practices with which compliance is not mandatory.
Standards become a vehicle for sharing of knowledge, technology and good practices, an
essential component of the worldwide industrial and post industrialist infrastructure, supporting
economic activities, societal needs and more equitable opportunities - in other words, sustained
development.
The main features of standardization revolve round interchangeability, variety reduction;
improved communication of technical criteria, commonly agreed safety and performance
parameters.
Standardization applies to:
• Testing methods
• Calibration of instruments
• Sampling methods
Standards provide many benefits to all sectors of the economy, for example:
Business - Standards ensure that businesses become sustainable as standards help to
ensure the efficiency and quality output. In other words standards impact the bottom
line.
Consumer - Standards serve as protection for public health and safety, guaranteeing
quality products.
Trade - Standards facilitate trade by making products competitive in international
markets.
Governments - Standards enable Governments to implement technical regulations.
Society - Standards offer protection and contribute positively to economic prosperity and
growth.
It is important to note that the standards provide guidance to trade and therefore every
organization that focuses at serious business to have its own set of standards that are perhaps
more stringent than the national standards so as to gain competitive edge in the marketplace.
The automotive industry is still considered to be the role model for robotic flexibility. However,
Wodoslawsky says many of the lessons learned by automakers and suppliers can easily be
applied to other industries and processes.
“Automotive manufacturers are faced with producing a greater mix of vehicles in a shrinking
number of plants,” adds Walter Saxe, automotive business development manager at Applied
Robotics Inc. (Glenville, NY). “This practice is driving the need for higher payloads, faster tool
changeover and greater control of data to achieve maximum flexibility and exacting production
details. This in turn is challenging the makers of robots and tools to stay ahead of the ever-
increasing market needs by advancing technologies before they are needed.
” For instance, state-of-the-art robots feature force control, which offers an extra degree of
flexibility for critical applications such as powertrain assembly. Other new tools and features that
make robots more suitable for flexible production applications include open architecture that
allows easy integration with commonly used PLC platforms and offline simulation from desktop
computers.
“[Manufacturing engineers should ensure their] controls platform has the ability to manage,
manipulate and store all the data that is required with flexible implementation schemes,” says
David Huffstetler, market manager at Staubli Robotics (Duncan, SC). “It can become a critical
issue in places where you least expect it to happen.
Ans:- Transfer pricing is the rates or prices that are utilized when selling goods or services
between company divisions and departments, or between a parent company and a subsidiary.
The transfer pricing that is set for the exchange may be the original purchase price of the goods
in question, or a rate that is reduced due to internal depreciation. When used properly, transfer
pricing can help to more efficiently manage profit and loss ratios within the company. Generally,
transfer pricing is considered to be a relatively simple method of moving goods and services
among the overall corporate family.
In situations where the transportation of goods is involved in the transaction, the transfer pricing
may include both a fixed price per unit transferred, plus additional charges to cover the cost of
shipping. This model is especially helpful when the transfer takes place between a parent
company and a subsidiary. The larger entity can arrange the shipping through a discounted
shipping plan that the smaller entity may not be able to access. The end result is that the transfer
pricing makes it possible to move the goods with the smallest amount of expense to the company
as a whole.
In addition, transfer pricing is a great way to move goods from one company division or
department to another without generating a lot of postings on the Accounts Receivable and
Accounts Payable books. The value of the goods is simply moved from one division to the other,
a process that greatly simplifies the process. Normally, there is a simple form that accompanies
the physical transfer of the goods, and is used by both the sender and the recipient to make
appropriate posts in company accounting records. This process eliminates the necessity for
invoices, tariffs, internal bills of lading, and other documents that would normally apply to a new
purchase using an outside vendor.
While the main purpose of transfer pricing is to enhance the overall value of the corporate family
of companies, there are instances when this type of transaction can be abused. This is especially
true when transfers to international locations are conducted. Today, many countries have
regulations to help prevent the use of transfer pricing as a means of evading taxes or similar
unethical and illegal activities.
Q.3 b. Write a short note on Bills of Exchange and Letters of credit.
The sole aim of the organization is to integrate the developing economies into the world
economy. It's an organization to ensure that the domestic policies and international actions are
supportive for maintaining sustainable development.
Functions of UNCTAD
The secretariat of the United States work with the member Governments by interacting with the
organizations of the United Nations system, Government Institutions, research institutes and
NGOs.
Achievements of UNCTAD
During its 40 years of existence, UNCTAD has to its credit, a formidable array of often trail
blazing achievements. These have been well-documented in the relevant literature. To name only
a few of its significant achievements, UNCTAD prompted IMF to expand its compensatory
financing facility. It helped in keeping alive the issue of creating additional liquidity under IMF,
by linking it to the provision of additional resources for development. It simulated discussion in
the World Bank on Supplementary Financing which had far-reaching implications for the
strategy the Bank subsequently adopted for supporting development in developing countries. Its
decisions helped in operationalizing the ODA target, while its work on external debt led to the
creation of the Paris Club and measures to alleviate the debt burden. The first ever generalised
system of preferences (GSP) was negotiated in UNCTAD. It provided a forum for negotiating
some very significant international commodity agreements, and through its Integrated
Programme for Commodities (IPC), it put in place the structure of an ambitious programme for
negotiating and implementing such agreements, including buffer stock financing, for practically
all the commodities of export interest to developing countries. It is a different matter that IPC
never got going.
Through its research and policy analysis work, UNCTAD became the breeding ground for new
ideas. Through this work, it highlighted the inequities and anomalies prevailing in hitherto
secluded and unexplored recesses of the world economy like insurance, shipping, technology
transfer etc. Its studies documented declining terms of trade of the developing countries, the cost
of tied aid for the beneficiary countries, the importance of non-tariff barriers, and the gap
between the effective and nominal tariff rates. If there is today a greater transparency in the
world economic system, it is in no small measure due to the relentless manner in which
UNCTAD, particularly in its initial years, went about exposing the unfairness of the system.
According to a Northern commentator writing barely four years after the operationalization of
UNCTAD, “UNCTAD has impressed the rich with the problems of the poor, has given impetus
to new proposals and has stimulated other international agencies to re-examine and intensify
their efforts”.
Its achievements have therefore been of different kinds and of varying impact. Among the most
significant achievements reported to the Inspector by the UNCTAD secretariat could be
included:
• The agreement on the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) (1971), under which
over $70 billion worth of developing countries' exports receive preferential treatment in
most developed country markets every year;
• The setting up of the Global System of Trade Preferences among Developing Countries
(1989);
• Tthe adoption of the Set of Multilaterally Agreed Principles for the Control of Restrictive
Business Practices (1980);
• The negotiation of the Common Fund for Commodities (1989), set up to provide
financial backing for the operation of international stocks and for research and
development projects in the field of commodities, and which did not fulfil many
expectations of the developing countries;
• The establishment of guidelines for international action in the area of debt rescheduling
(1980);
• The Agreement on a Special New Programme of Action for the Least Developed
Countries (1981);
• The Programme of Action for the Least Developed Countries for the 1990s (1990);
• The negotiation of conventions in the area of maritime transport: United Nations Convention on a
Code of Conduct for Linear Conferences (1974), United Nations Convention on International
Carriage of Goods by Sea (1978), United Nations Convention on International Multimodal
Transport of Goods (1980), United Nations Convention on Conditions for Registration of Ships
(1986), United Nations Convention on Maritime Liens and Mortgages (1993).
Q. 5 b. Give reasons for the slow growth towards achieving international accounting
standards.
Ans: - IFRS has been adopted by more than 12,000 companies in over 100 nations and is
becoming the global standard for the preparation of financial statements of public companies
throughout the world. However, in the U.S., GAAP (General Accepted Accounting Principles) is
applied. Recently, the G20 leaders have called for significant progress towards moving to one set
of high-quality global accounting standards. President Obama also called for one set of standards
and substantial progress to be made in 2009. Now SEC is working on an updated "roadmap" that
will layout a schedule and major milestones for moving U.S. towards its adoption by all U.S.
public companies. There are advantages and disadvantages of converting to IFRS, and various
arguments have made for and against its adoption.
A single set of accounting standards will provide comparability, and enable companies from
different parts of the world to apply the same standards. It increases transparency, allowing
easier cross-border investment with greater liquidity and low cost of capital. It will also cut down
the time and costs of preparing financial statements according to different standards and
regulations, achieving enormous savings of capital in the longer term. The transition cost is
estimated to be 8 billion dollars for the entire U.S. economy, with average one-time cost of $3.24
million dollars for multinational corporations. Since the financial reports were reduced from
three to one, they will save money in the long run. The adoption of IFRS and use of uniform
accounting standards will also eliminate the possible different accounting results from applying
different standards and help investors to pursue various strategies including global investment
diversification.Many companies may soon be required to report in multiple accounting standards
if the US does not either accept or move toward IFRS. Maintaining multiple standards reporting
only increases accounting and auditing costs and provides no value to any country. Over 100
countries have adopted or in the process of adopting IFRS. Delays in adopting IFRS by the US
will make multi-national companies to report their primary reports in IFRS, resulting in parallel
reports in US GAAP.
This will create more auditing fees and possible errors. The US should move towards the IFRS
standards as a matter of urgency. As more and more countries adopt IFRS, it is in the U.S.
interests to apply the same accounting standards. Most of the U.S. companies will benefit from
one set of accounting standards since are multinational companies and they operating globally.
IFRS will make it easier to control and monitor their subsidiaries in foreign countries and
achieve cost savings from maintaining several accounting standards. It can also help to eliminate
potential financial misunderstandings and simplify investment decisions. With its strong moral
standard, intolerance for unethical behavior, the US has been a world leader for centuries. Its
financial and accounting standards have been used by other countries as a yardstick to measure
their economic and financial success until recently. We need to be a leader and the driving force
in establishing and adopting international standards.
It is the time for us to get involved and play an important role in shaping the international
standards. Otherwise, it will hurt us in the long run. Competition works and is a good thing
because it will ensure better quality with lower price. Competition between different sets of
standards will offer the advantage of getting better information. There is really no one size fits all
standards. The uniform single accounting standard can stifle innovation, ingenuity, competition,
creativity and capitalism entrepreneurship. The differences between GAAP and other countries'
standards can be very useful and provide insight into the reasons and values they conduct
financial reporting in a particular way. By focusing on our differences, we will benefit from
increased productivity, higher quality, technological innovation, thus better meet the demands of
the marketplace. Switching to IFSB will give IASB monopoly status, with the potential to
compromise the quality of the IASB standards. A recent survey shows that to convert to IFRS,
U.S. companies have to pay more than their European counterparts. The added benefits of
comparability versus cost to implement IFRS will not justify the adoption.
According to the SEC, it will cost.12% of revenues to implement the standards nationwide,
which means the cost can be as high as several billion dollars. The cost to achieve the additional
comparability is not worth several billion dollars. It will drain on our slowly recovering
economy. From a cost benefit perspective, convergence is obviously superior to adoption.
Transition to IFRS itself can present be a lot of challenges. The economy of the U.S. is the
largest in the world and nobody knows exactly the scope and magnitude of applying IFRS to
such a large economy. IFRS has not been tested in any country like the U.S. On the other hand,
U.S. GAAP has been evolving with various changes in the U.S. and stands the test of time,
especially the frauds such as Enron and Tyco International.
Enforcement can also create some problems. While the U.S. has effective enforcement, it is very
challenging to implement stringent enforcement among those member countries due to the
differences in economic and political system among the adopting nations and their financial
reporting practices. In summary, adopting IFRS will provide comparability, increased audit
efficiency, reduced information misunderstanding and cost savings as more and more economic
activities become globalized. The flip side is it will eliminate competition and incentives to
innovate. The quality will suffer since compromises have to be made to achieve consensus due to
various political pressures and economic interest. However many support for a move to a single
set global accounting standards and it is believed that the U.S. will ultimately IFRS or have IFRS
and U.S. GAAP coexist.
Ans:- Human resource management (HRM) has been perceived by many observers as a key
ingredient accounting for the success of Japanese companies on world markets during the 1980s.
Suggestions of how Western managers could learn from Japanese HRM practices were plentiful.
Only one decade later, however, Japan went into a recession from which it has not yet fully
recovered. Paradoxically, these same HRM practices are now being viewed by a series of authors
as the root of the malaise. This chapter investigates whether Japanese HR managers are now
planning to learn from the West. More specifically, it explores whether Japanese HR managers
are keen to learn from Western (in this case American and German) HRM and what they intend
to adopt. In order to find answers to these questions we study Japanese HR managers intentions
and practices at two levels: at headquarters (HQ) and at subsidiary level.
As the ‘traditional’ Japanese HRM modelii is increasingly regarded to be in crisis and subject to
major change (Dalton and Benson, 2002), this issue is of particular significance for Japanese
companies. Indeed, one can argue that the question of whether, or to what extent, Japan should
incorporate Western management practices, is standing now for the last one and a half decades at
the centre of Japanese management research. Frenkel (1994) observed a convergence toward
Western HRM practices, Ornatowski (1998) even discussed the end of Japanese-style HRM,
Matanle (2003) noted a part convergence in the direction of Western management and Aoki,
Jackson and Miyajima (2007) and Schaede (2008) described irreversible tendencies toward an
adaptation of Western management concepts. Yet despite this research focus, there is little
empirical work on managers’ knowledge of practices elsewhere, and on their views on cross-
national adoption. This seems to be a serious omission: such adoption processes are implemented
by managers rather than academics; and it is surprising that little empirical research has been
done in order to understand better those perceptions and judgments upon which adoption
decisions ultimately rely.iii This viewpoint guides the empirical focus of the research.
One obvious difficulty we are presented with if we wish to answer the question what Japan can
learn from ‘the West’ is the selection of countries that are representative of ‘the West’. In this
study we limit our empirical research to the inspirations Japan might receive from the USA and
Germany. This selection has some merit, in representing the largest and the third largest
developed economies in the world (with Japan being the second largest economy), and the
economically dominant nations of North America and Europe (with Japan being the leading
economy in Asia). In addition, the USA and Germany each embody the prime example of two of
the three main varieties of market economies: the USA representing the free market economy of
Anglo-Saxon countries and Germany the social market economy of continental Europe (with
Japan embodying the third main variety of market economies, the government-induced market
economy of East-Asia). Furthermore, according to Smith & Meiksins (1995: 243) the USA,
Japan and Germany are most frequently referred to as role models, “as they provide ‘best
practice’ ideals from which other societies can borrow and learn.” Consequently, these country
models have been subject to numerous comparative analysis (Thurow, 1992; Garten, 1993;
Yamamura and Streeck, 2003; Pascha, 2004; Jacoby, 2005). As economic performance and
growth paths vary over time the role of a ‘dominant’ economy also rotates among countries. In
the 1950s, 1960s and most of the 1970s the American management style clearly was dominant
and a common expectation was that it would spread around the world, gaining application in
many foreign countries. From the late 1970s to the early 1990s, this argument increasingly was
applied to Japan (Mueller, 1994), and to a lesser extent and limited to the European context, to
Germany (Albert, 1991; Thurow, 1992). Since the implosion of the Japanese economy, the
stagnation of the German economy, and with the advent of globalization, the conventional
wisdom over the last one and a half decades up to the current economic crisis has been that the
American management model is particularly well suited to provide the necessary flexibility to
cope with rapidly evolving economic and technological conditions. Consequently, the USA
became again the dominant role model (Edwards et al., 2005).
Japanese firms are compelled to compete in global markets. Severe competition in the global
markets means that participants are forced to accept the low market rate of returns and high risks
of the markets’ growth. The issue of how to manage their human resources in the global
competition age is a salient challenge for Japanese management.
In the successful three decades, the domestic and foreign market had been continuously growing.
In that period, Japanese employers provided long term employment and paid employees on a
seniority basis, which drove employees to work hard. Growing markets enabled the employers to
make a benevolent cycle in which increased pay based on good firm performance led to high
commitment by employees, and in turn, this high commitment led to more pay based on the good
performances of firms. In fact, this benevolent cycle, however, just depended on a continuous
expansion of markets. Therefore, with the collapse of the ‘bubble economy’ in the beginning of
the 1990s, these traditional HRM arrangements required transformation.
A demise of the steady growing market meant an exhaustion of the available funds for
distribution. Consequently, Japanese employers introduced the performance oriented HRM
system in which they paid more money to those who contributed more to the firms and paid less
to those who did less. The Japanese employers naively believed that the principle to pay more for
a good job and less for a poor job should work well to motivate employees. Their expectation,
however, was completely unfounded. The issue that they should have learnt from the previous
fifteen years of workplace experience was not understood. Indeed, a majority of Japanese
employees worked hard and performed their jobs well, but most of them were not evaluated
proficiently and not paid accordingly to their performance, because the number of the employees
to be rated excellently was limited. As a result, most of employees lost their enthusiasm for their
jobs and the company performance worsened. In other words, the benevolent cycle in the past
successful three decades turned into a vicious cycle in the following fifteen years.
The relative evaluation for employees was certainly one of the factors that prevented the
performance oriented HRM from creating another benevolent cycle. Nonetheless, the most
important reason why the performance oriented HRM system had a functional failure was that
the employers transferred market risk to the employees. Many employers linked the funds to pay
to employees as bonuses (lump sum payment) to the performance of the firms. In fact, some
employers changed the proportion of excellent employees according to the firm’s performance,
and other employers paid employees directly based on their contribution to the performance of
firms. The linkage between a firm’s performance and the employee’s wage meant that employees
as well as stockholders and corporate managers had to take their share of risk of a company’s
performance. However, agency theory explains that an employee, who usually is risk averse,
would not take share of risk because a risk averter exerts less effort and performs less if risks are
imposed on him or her (Milgrom & Roberts 1992).
Two hypotheses are proposed. First, Japanese employers adopted a new type of HR initiative
with the expectation that these frameworks would lead to more favourable outcomes. Second,
their decision to change the HRM system from people oriented to performance oriented was
theoretically justified, but poorly operated. Judging from the observations and analyses so far, a
reasonable conclusion is that the Japanese employers embraced a system that did not realise their
desired objectives.
A performance oriented HRM system was less compatible with Japanese people or a Japanese
organisation. The introduced performance oriented HRM system threatened employees into hard
work with the exposure to the risks of unemployment and sudden reduction of salary. A system
like this is unlikely to either promote the institutional cohesiveness of the group or develop
organisational skills. It follows that the Japanese firms are likely to consider changing the HRM
from people oriented to job oriented in the future, although this change might be the result of
elimination of an unpopular scheme, there are reasons that are more positive. A reason why
Japanese management may inevitably change the HRM system to job oriented is that such an
arrangement has the potential to provide fairer and clearer criterion to the management of human
resources in the global labour market.
Ans:- Purchasing Power Parity Theory of Exchange Rate is a theory, which establishes the
fact that the exchange rates between currencies are in equilibrium in the event of equality in the
purchasing power of each of the countries. This precisely means that the ratio of the price level
of a fixed amount of goods and services of the two countries and the exchange rate between
those two countries must be equivalent. PPP is based on the ‘Law of One Price’. If the inflation
rate within a country’s economy increases then the value of the currency needs to depreciate to
revive the PPP. In the absence of transportation and other similar expenses, the competitive
market will equalize the price of an identical object in two countries when the prices are
expressed by the same currency. However, one has to be careful with the Law of one Price. The
application of the Law of One Price is contingent upon certain conditions. They are:
• A competitive market must be present in both the countries for the goods and services
• The law is only applicable to the goods that can be traded between the countries.
• Transport expenses and other transaction expenses must be checked since they are
considered hindrances in trading.
Types of PPP
Calculation of PPP
The purchasing power parity (PPP) theory is based on an extension and variation of the law of
one price as applied to the aggregate economy. It is calculated as:
In other words, the exchange rate adjusts in a way so that an identical good or a service in two
different countries has the same price when expressed in the same currency.
For example, on a single good level, a McDonald's Big Mac that sells for C$3.63 in Canada
should cost US$3.22 in a U.S. city when the exchange rate between Canada and the U.S. is 1.13
USD/CND.
This calculation is simplified to the Big Mac index level to illustrate the concept. The purchasing
power parity applies the same concept just on a higher level, that is on a representative basket of
goods and services.
If we look at this from another angle, the 1.13 USD/CND is the purchasing power parity in this
case. Since exchange rates are volatile and influenced by many factors, the real market exchange
rate can be higher or lower than the 1.13 USD/CND.