Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DAVID
L.C .No.00120
Assignment Set- 1
At its most basic, there is nothing mysterious about globalization. The term has
come into common usage since the 1980s, reflecting technological advances that
have made it easier and quicker to complete international transactions – both trade
and financial flows. It refers to an extension beyond national borders of the same
market forces that have operated for centuries at all levels of human economic
activity – village markets, urban industries, or financial centers.
Globalization is not just a recent phenomenon. Some analysts have argued that the
world economy was just as globalized 100 years ago as it is today. But today
commerce and financial services are far more developed and deeply integrated than
they were at that time. The most striking aspect of this has been the integration of
financial markets made possible by modern electronic communication.
The 20th century saw unparalleled economic growth, with global per capita GDP
increasing almost five-fold. But this growth was not steady – the strongest
expansion came during the second half of the century, a period of rapid trade
expansion accompanied by trade – and typically somewhat later, financial –
liberalization. Chart 1 break the century into four periods. In the inter-war era, the
world turned its back on internationalism – or globalization as we now call it – and
countries retreated into closed economies, protectionism and pervasive capital
controls. This was a major factor in the devastation of this period, when per capita
income growth fell to less than 1 percent during 1913-1950. For the rest of the
century, even though population grew at an unprecedented pace, per capita income
growth was over 2 percent, the fastest pace of all coming during the post – World
War boom in the industrial countries.
The story of the 20th century was of remarkable average income growth, but it is
also quite obvious that the progress was not evenly dispersed. The gaps between
rich and poor countries, and rich and poor people within countries, have grown.
The richest quarter of the world’s population saw its per capita GDP increase
nearly six-fold during the century, while the poorest quarter experienced less than a
three-fold increase (Chart 1). Income inequality has clearly increased. But, as
noted below, per capita GDP does not tell the whole story.
Globalization means that world trade and financial markets are becoming more
integrated. But just how far have developing countries been involved in this
integration? Their experience in catching up with the advanced economies has
· Trade: Developing countries as a whole have increased their share of world trade
– from 19 percent in 1971 to 29 percent in 1999. But Chart 2b shows great
variation among the major regions. For instance, the newly industrialized
economies (NIEs) of Asia have done well, while Africa as a whole has fared
poorly. The composition of what countries export is also important. The strongest
rise by far has been in the export of manufactured goods. The share of primary
commodities in world exports – such as food and raw materials – that are often
produced by the poorest countries, has declined.
· Movement of people: Workers move from one country to another partly to find
better employment opportunities. The numbers involved are still quite small, but in
the period 1965-90, the proportion of labor forces round the world that was foreign
born increased by about one-half. Most migration occurs between developing
countries. But the flow of migrants to advanced economies is likely to provide a
means through which global wages converge. There is also the potential for skills
to be transferred back to the developing countries and for wages in those countries
to rise.
3
Few, if any, organizations have become truly multicultural. The major dimensions
that characterize organizations as they eventually achieve this state are pluralism,
full structural integration, full integration of the informal network, an absence of
prejudice and discrimination, no gap in organizational identification based on
cultural identity group, and low levels of inter-group conflict attributable to
diversity.
The resulting integration of the world economy has raised living standards around
the world. Most developing countries have shared in this prosperity; in some,
5
4. Blindly chasing “E-orders” from around the world. Avoid Accidental Exporting
The typical pattern of a product is represented by a curve divided into four distinct
phases: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline. Recent research in the area has
focused on its use in decision making in areas ranging from those as broad as
overall strategy to those as narrow as equipment replacement.
But does the product life cycle, or PLC, really tell the entire story? Consider the
Ford Mustang. Since its 1964 introduction, the automobile has undergone several
changes. Performance was increased with the addition of the 428 CobraJet in 1968
and Mach I styling in 1969. Another substantial change took place in 1971 with the
introduction of the high-performance Boss 351. Then a true muscle car, the
Mustang was detuned in 1974, when oil prices forced a more fuel-efficient
redesign, called Mustang II. The fourth generation Mustang, introduced as the
1994 model, has been further refined and is more aerodynamic than its immediate
predecessor. Yet it still shares roots with earlier models. A 302 V-8 is still offered,
the wheelbase is similar, and if one looks closely enough, one can see its genesis in
the 1964 model. The pattern evidenced by the life of the Mustang, then, is several
curves of introduction, growth, maturity, and decline.
1. No barriers to trade
World trade is assumed to be free from any impediments, such as tariffs, quotas,
voluntary export restraints, and exchange control.
2. No transportation cost
PC prevails in both product and factor markets. This assumption rules out
monopolistic and oligopolistic market structures. It also rules out price and wage
rigidities. In a perfectly competitive market all buyers and sellers are price takers,
i.e., each one is too small to exert market power and influence market prices. All
factors are fully employed.
4. Factors are mobile in each country but are immobile across national
borders.
Like Ricardo, HO model draws a sharp distinction between domestic and external
factor mobility. The maximum degree of factor mobility is permitted between
industries within the same country (internal factor mobility). But neither capital
nor labour can cross national borders (international factor immobility).
IFM insures that workers move from a low wage region to a high wage region, and
capital moves from a low interest country to a high interest region. The net effect is
that all factor prices are the same within a country.
5. No specialization
After the introduction of free trade, neither country specializes in one commodity,
as in Ricardian model. Each country produces both goods.
CRS means that a proportionate increase in all inputs increases the output by
the same percentage.
Production functions are the same in America and Britain. The HO model is a long
run model. Ohlin argued that "the physical conditions of production are
everywhere the same." Some countries may be slow to adopt new technology.
With the development of modern telecommunications, information travels fast.
This is a result of declining transportation and communication costs.
Remark: The implication of (1) and (2) is that commodity trade equalizes
commodity prices between countries. That is, Americans and Britons pay the same
prices for same commodities.
This sounds like an exaggerated claim, and it would be wrong to make too much of
it. Nevertheless, the system does contribute to international peace, and if we
understand why, we have a clearer picture of what the system actually does.
Peace is partly an outcome of two of the most fundamental principles of the trading
system: helping trade to flow smoothly and providing countries with a
constructive and fair outlet for dealing with disputes over trade issues. It is also
an outcome of the international confidence and cooperation that the system
creates and reinforces.
As trade expands in volume, in the number of products traded, and in the numbers
of countries and companies trading, there is a greater chance that disputes will
arise. The WTO system helps resolve these disputes peacefully and constructively.
There could be a down side to trade liberalization and expansion. More trade
means more possibilities for disputes to arise. Left to themselves, those disputes
could lead to serious conflict. But in reality, a lot of international trade tension is
reduced because countries can turn to organizations, in particular the WTO, to
settle their trade disputes.
3. A system based on rules rather than power makes life easier for all
The WTO cannot claim to make all countries equal. But it does reduce some
inequalities, giving smaller countries more voice, and at the same time freeing the
major powers from the complexity of having to negotiate trade agreements with
each of their numerous trading partners
Decisions in the WTO are made by consensus. The WTO agreements were
negotiated by all members, were approved by consensus and were ratified in all
members’ parliaments. The agreements apply to everyone. Rich and poor countries
alike have an equal right to challenge each other in the WTO’s dispute settlement
procedures.
10
We are all consumers. The prices we pay for our food and clothing, our necessities
and luxuries, and everything else in between, are affected by trade policies.
Protectionism is expensive: it raises prices. The WTO’s global system lowers trade
barriers through negotiation and applies the principle of non-discrimination. The
result is reduced costs of production (because imports used in production are
cheaper) and reduced prices of finished goods and services, and ultimately a lower
cost of living.
Think of all the things we can now have because we can import them: fruits and
vegetables out of season, foods, clothing and other products that used to be
considered exotic, cut flowers from any part of the world, all sorts of household
goods, books, music, movies, and so on.
Think also of the things people in other countries can have because they buy
exports from us and elsewhere. Look around and consider all the things that would
disappear if all our imports were taken away from us. Imports allow us more
choice – both more goods and services to choose from, and a wider range of
qualities. Even the quality of locally – produced goods can improve because of the
competition from imports.
7. Trade stimulates economic growth and that can be good news for
employment
Trade clearly has the potential to create jobs. In practice there is often factual
evidence that lower trade barriers have been good for employment. But the picture
is complicated by a number of factors. Nevertheless, the alternative –
protectionism – is not the way to tackle employment problems.
8. The basic principles make the system economically more efficient, and they
cut costs
11
The GATT – WTO system which evolved in the second half of the 20th Century
helps governments take a more balanced view of trade policy. Governments are
better – placed to defend themselves against lobbying from narrow interest groups
by focusing on trade – offs that are made in the interests of everyone in the
economy
Under WTO rules, once a commitment has been made to liberalize a sector of
trade, it is difficult to reverse. The rules also discourage a range of unwise
policies. For businesses, that means greater certainty and clarity about trading
conditions. For governments it can often mean good discipline.
*********************************************
12
World trade is assumed to be free from any impediments, such as tariffs, quotas,
voluntary export restraints, and exchange control.
2. No transportation cost
PC prevails in both product and factor markets. This assumption rules out
monopolistic and oligopolistic market structures. It also rules out price and wage
rigidities. In a perfectly competitive market all buyers and sellers are price takers,
i.e., each one is too small to exert market power and influence market prices. All
factors are fully employed.
4. Factors are mobile in each country but are immobile across national
borders.
Like Ricardo, HO model draws a sharp distinction between domestic and external
factor mobility. The maximum degree of factor mobility is permitted between
industries within the same country (internal factor mobility). But neither capital
nor labour can cross national borders (international factor immobility).
13
IFI implies that Mexican workers are not allowed to work or migrate to the US.
5. No specialization
After the introduction of free trade, neither country specializes in one commodity,
as in Ricardian model. Each country produces both goods.
CRS means that a proportionate increase in all inputs increases the output by
the same percentage.
Production functions are the same in America and Britain. The HO model is a long
run model. Ohlin argued that "the physical conditions of production are
everywhere the same." Some countries may be slow to adopt new technology.
With the development of modern telecommunications, information travels fast.
This is a result of declining transportation and communication costs.
Remark: The implication of (1) and (2) is that commodity trade equalizes
commodity prices between countries. That is, Americans and Britons pay the same
prices for same commodities.
14