Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 2
Reduction of GHG Emissions from Shipping
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
1985
#3 ASEF in Shanghai
1986
1987
1988
1989
World GDP
1990
1991
1992
Seaborne Transport
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
Seaborne Transport & World GDP
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
0
1
2
3
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 6
Outline of CO2 Emissions Regulation Measures in IMO
CO2 Emission (g)=Transportation (ton-mile) x Emission Efficiency (g /ton-mile)
How to Reduce ? Market Based Measures
A Reduce the amount of MBI: Market-Based Instrument
Transportation Æ Affect Sea trade
B Impro
Improve
e Efficiency
Efficienc •Global Emission Trading Scheme
(ETS)
B-1 TECHNICAL •Global Contribution Scheme (Levy)
B-2 OPERATIONAL •Other
Speed control,
control Weather Routing
Routing, Well
maintenance, Optimum trim and draft etc.
EEOI
CO
FOC x C
EEDI =
(g/ton--mile)
(g/ton Capacity × Vs
Delivery
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 8
How to use Technical & Operational Measures
In Case of New Ship
Calculate
1. EEDI EEDI Verified Verified
2. Verification EEDI EEDI
4. EEOI Monitoring
Technical
T h i l and
d operational
ti l measures ; developed
d l d in
i MEPC.59
MEPC 59
Æ Trial purposes or Voluntary Implementation
1. Interim Guidelines on the method of calculation of the EEDI (MEPC.1/Circ.681)
2. Interim Guidelines for voluntary verification of the EEDI (MEPC.1/Circ. 682)
3. Guidance for the development of a SEEMP (MEPC.1/Circ. 683)
4 Guidelines for voluntary use of the EEOI (MEPC.1/Circ.684)
4. (MEPC 1/Circ 684)
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 9
Concept of Maritime Emission Trading Scheme (ETS)
Shipping Sector
Ship A
Ship B
on
Otherr Sectorrs
Current Emissio
Buy Credits
ement
Excess Allowance
Afterr Improve
S
Surplus
l
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 10
Concept of Global Contribution Scheme (Levy)
Contributions GHG
( per unit fuel) •Mitigation and Adaptation projects
Fund •R&D on low emission ships
•IMO – Technical Cooperation
p
Refund •Human resource development
•Investment on Infrastructure
Labeling Development of ship recycling
•Development
Evaluated by EEOI records capability
(MEPC 59/4/34)
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 11
Current Status (MEPC59) and Future Plan
Legal Instrument ; Defer consideration of all documents addressing the type
of legal instrument and application issues, when the issues could be
discussed in light of the outcome of COP 15 (Dec.,
(Dec 2009 in Copenhagen)
Market-based measures ; agreed work plan;
MEPC 60 to consider, on the basis of further detailed outlines of possible
market-based
k b d measures, the
h methodology
h d l andd criteria
i i forf feasibility
f ibili
studies and impact assessments.
MEPC 61 to clearly indicate which market-based measure the Committee
wishes to evaluate further
MEPC 62 to report its progress to the 27th Assembly
Position of IMO ; Anyy regulatory
g y scheme should be developed p and enacted
by IMO
Mitigation and Adaptation ; Greater part of any funds by MBI to be used for
climate change purposes in developing countries (general preference)
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 12
Development of Technical and Operational
measures
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 13
EEDI; Energy Efficiency Design Index
Formula of EEDI ; Interim Guidelines for New Ships(MEPC.1/Circ.681)
Emission Reduction due to innovative technology
BALLAST PUMPS
Æ Guidelines
G id li would
ld be
b reviewed
i d by
b trial
t i l use. REEFERS
PAE
DIESEL-ELECTRIC
DIESEL ELECTRIC
SHAFT
PROPULSION SHAFT WASTE HEAT
GENERATOR PPTO
MOTOR PPTI RECOVERY PAEeff
MAIN ENGINE
PUMPS (2.5% PME)
SHAFT POWER
PS MAIN ENGINE PME
ACCOMMODATION
(250 kW)
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 15
Formula for Establishing EEDI Baseline
Basic Concept of Regression Formula (Proposed by Denmark MEPC58/4/8)
Exponential Regression to be applied for new vessels built in last 10 years
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 16
Verification of EEDI
Interim Guidelines for Voluntary Verification (MEPC.1/Circ.682) ;
Two stages ; Preliminary at design, and Final at Sea Trial
Technical File ; DWT, MCR, SFC, Power Curve, etc.
Speed ; verified by Model Test at design stage and by Sea Trial in final
ÎIn a long history of Shipbuilding Industry
Industry, Speed has never been verified by 3rd party
party.
Additional Information ; Detail Report of model test, Lines, Calculation Process, Model-
Ship correlation, Lightweight (To protect shipbuilders’ confidential information, it should be
provided directly to the verifier)
verifier).
Sea Trial ; Verifier attend. Measurement
and Analysis method should be verified
by attending verifier and document
document.
Guidelines would be reviewed by trial use.
Period 1:
Average = 96.7
96 7
Period 2:
Average = 87.3
Voyage
Source ; MEPC 59/4/34
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 18
SEEMP ; Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan
Guidance for the Development of SSEMP(MEPC.1/Circ.683);
Documentation for establish internal mechanism to improve Energy Efficiency
4-Steps;
1. Planning
2. Implementation
3. Monitoring
4. Self-Evaluation and Improvement
Goal Setting ; voluntary (no need to announce to the public)
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 19
CO2 Emission Reduction Technologies
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 20
Reduction Measures of EEDI
However,
EE
Speed Down
DWT
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 21
Efficiency Improvement Scenario
New ship (MEPC 59/INF.27)
Existing ship
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 23
Projection of CO2 Emission (A1B Base)
CO2(million ton)
5000
2050: 4817Mt→2363Mt
4500
2453Mt reduction(
reduction(49
49%
%)
4000 New Technologies
3500
3000
Applied step by step 2040: 2978Mt→1747Mt
2500 1273Mt reduction(
reduction
d ti (43 43%
%)
2000
1500
1000
CO2 emissions from
500 New Ships
Emissions from Existing
g Ships
p
0
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
CY
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 24
Projection of CO2 Emission (B2 Base)
4500
1500
1000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
CY
#3 ASEF in Shanghai 25
Conclusion ; Impact on Shipbuilding Industry
Development of CO2 Emissions Regulation Measures is still in progress. and it should be
managed by IMO. Regulations should be transparent and eliminate escape route.
E
Energy Efficient
Effi i t Technologies
T h l i is i effective
ff ti nott only
l against
i t Global
Gl b l Warming
W i but
b t also
l
Shipping Economy.
Near Future, when Shipping Sector face the lack of Bunker Oil and its price increase,
operator will easily recover initial investment of Energy Efficient Technologies. Also, the
price must be pushed by the demand for Low Sulfur Fuel (1,000$/t ?).
Cost Effective Technical Measures to reduce CO2 emissions would be a lot and it is not a
dream to achieve 50% reduction.
It is obvious that Shipping is the most energy efficient transportation mode in the world.
Shipbuilding industry should continue the efforts to develop new technologies to reduce
/eliminate CO2, which support sustainable growth of shipping industry.