Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Rainer. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2011. 288 pages. Reviewed by Jason M. Fletcher.
This book was chosen as it is the most recent work published by Thom Rainer who is a
leading thinker and writer in the field of church growth. It was also chosen as it is one of the
first major works dedicated to understanding what has been called the millennial generation.
Thom S. Rainer holds a Ph.D. from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary where he was the
founding dean of the Billy Graham School of Missions, Evangelism, and Church Growth. He
currently serves as President and C.E.O. of LifeWay Christian Resources. He has written more
than twenty books on church growth and revitalization. Thom co-authored this book with his
son, Jess Rainer. Jess is a self-described millennial who is completing a Masters degree from
Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and is currently serving as the Administration and
In this book Thom and Jess Rainer describe the millennial generation. They define the
millennials as those born in the United States between 1980 and 2000 (2). For the purpose of
this study, they narrowed their focus to the older millennials, those born between 1980 and 1991
(4). In order to write this book the authors surveyed twelve hundred millennials through the
The bulk of the book is dedicated to describing the results of this survey and how they
measured the millennials opinions on work, family, diversity, and finances, to name a few. The
most important chapters related to the area of missions, evangelism, and church growth would be
the final two. Chapter ten discusses the millennials and their faith. Chapter eleven gives
The chapter looking at the faith of the millennial generation was quite disturbing. The
authors admit that there is no common belief system among this generation (230).
1
2
The importance of spiritual matters ranked as only the 6th most important factor in their lives
after family (61 percent), friends (25 percent), education (17 percent), career (16 percent), and
spouse (13 percent) (229). When asked their spiritual preference, sixy-five percent identified
with Christianity (231). When given the definition of a born-again Christian who had made a
personal commitment to Jesus Christ as their Savior, the number dropped to twenty percent
(231). When the parameters were narrowed even further to identify those who would be born-
again evangelical Christians who held to some basic theological beliefs the number fell to only
six percent (232). In concluding this section, the authors chose to estimate a number between six
and twenty percent who would be “true Christians” (233). They settled on the number of fifteen
percent “for consistency.” I would question why they would choose such a high number. Two
Christian related to salvation being by grace alone and that Jesus did not commit any sins while
on earth (232). In my personal opinion if you have asked Jesus to be your Savior, but you also
believe that Jesus sinned while he was on earth, your faith is in another Jesus. Likewise, if one
believes that their salvation must be earned, they are following another gospel. In my opinion,
the authors may have overstated in the wrong direction the number of true Christians among the
millennials.
In surveying what millennials actually believe, the authors make several conclusions.
First, religion is less important for millennials than previous generations (243). Second,
millennials lack of excitement about religion can be evidenced by their lack of belief about the
authority of the Bible (244). Third, the millennials are anti-institutional church in their attitude
(244). The authors make the statement that seventy percent of millennials agree that “American
churches are irrelevant today” (244). They summarize this section by stating that the church’s
3
challenge is going to be less about overcoming an “adversarial attitude” toward Christianity, and
more about overcoming an apathetic attitude (244). This is a striking statement that the church
in the United States is going to have to overcome. How, then, should the church seek to be
relevant to this generation without sacrificing historical biblical convictions and principles? The
hope is that the next chapter will help answer that question.
Of all the negatives surrounding the study of the faith of millennials, the one bright spot
encountered by the authors is the relationship between the faith of the millennials and their
parents. As millennials valued family above every other category in their life, they showed a
preference for following their parents in their faith choices (245). They also state that the
millennials not only followed in their parents faith, but took their commitment level to a higher
level (246). The implication according to the authors is those that do choose Christianity are not
going to be lukewarm in their faith (246). While I would have hoped to have seen more specific
statistical evidence for the claims made in this section, the prior evidence shown concerning the
Chapter eleven seeks to make some practical applications for churches hoping to reach
the millennial generation. The authors divide their advice into how to connect with those
millennials who are Christians and how to reach those millennials who are not yet Christians. To
connect with millennial Christians the authors suggest becoming “radically committed to the
community” (259). Instead of being inward focused, churches are encouraged to serve the
community by being both missional and incarnational (260). This is also similar to their
(274). Second, churches should “go deep in biblical teaching” (261). This also is related to their
application toward non-Christian millennials by stating churches should “demonstrate the deep
4
meaning of following Christ” (273). The common denominator is the emphasis on not shying
away from teaching theology. If the authors are correct here, the millennial generation is not
going to be satisfied with surface-level teaching that the seeker-sensitive movement of the
1990’s was characterized by. The authors do not mention these examples, but I would posit that
the growth and reach of Mark Driscoll at Mars Hill Church in Seattle, and David Platt at the
Church at Brook Hills in Alabama are two examples of churches that are following this principle
Churches who would make an impact with millennials are also encouraged to “love the
nations” (264). This means not just giving to missions, but in directly participating in reaching
the nations for Christ (265). Related to this emphasis on missions it the need for churches to
“direct revenue outwardly” (266). The authors state that millennials are examining where
churches are spending their tithes and offerings and are more interested in their financial gifts
going out to reach their community and nation, as opposed to staying inside the church (267).
This particular section relates directly with the current movement within the Southern Baptist
Convention called the Great Commission Resurgence. Millennials who are becoming
missionaries, church planters, and pastors within the SBC are asking the same questions, not just
of their churches, but where the mission dollars from their churches are going. In my opinion,
the future of the relationship of the local church with the association, state convention, and SBC
will be directly related to the commitment of the various entities toward channeling money
toward impacting a lost North American culture and reaching the nations with the gospel.
The common denominator for churches hoping to connect and reach millennials was the
emphasis on churches and their leaders demonstrating “transparency, humility, and integrity”
(268, 275). The authors admit that they did not do a word search to see how many times
5
“humility” came up in their conversations with millennials, though I wish they had (268). They
conjectured that if they had it would probably have been the most desired trait millennials had of
leadership (268). Again, I do not disagree with the authors conclusions, but I had hoped they
The authors make the most unique application toward reaching non-Christian millennials
by making a link for non-Christians to have a family or parental influence. The authors point out
that eighty-six percent of millennials agreed that parents were a regular and key source of advice
and guidance (272). Because of that staggering statistic, the Rainers suggest connecting
“Boomer parents with Millennial children” (272). The authors barely scratch the surface of this
suggestion. While they point out a missional link, they do not give any examples or strategies as
One of this book’s strengths is the level of research that went into its composition.
Completing and synthesizing the information gleened from twelve-hundred respondents is not an
easy task. It does, however, lead one to believe that this work would be able to provide an
accurate and comprehensive look at an emerging generation within America that will be the first
Another strength is that though statistics are used throughout, this book was written for
the layperson. The non-technical writing style used makes for a work that is accessible to a wide
range of readers. Though the conclusions that are made deal specifically with the local church,
and the Rainers come from an explicitly evangelical Christian perspective, a majority of the
research would be beneficial for anyone working with this generation, in sacred or secular fields.
Really, it is a great read for anyone looking to learn more about the emerging millennial
generation.
6
My greatest disappointment and the greatest weakness to this book is that it is light on
application. Though its subtitle states, “Connecting to America’s Largest Generation,” the book
is short on practical steps on how to connect. It does, however, serve as an excellent resource on
how to understand America’s largest generation. In light of this shortcoming, I would still give
my whole-hearted recommendation to this book, especially for pastors and ministry leaders who
are ministering to the millennial generation now, and will need to respond to the growing size
and influence of this generation as they become the dominant generational force in the United
States.