Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Recoa 2010
Besides some experience, with simply intra articular PRPinjections, the author reserves
this procedure to specific cases of moderate symptomatic osteo arthritis where pain
relieve and functional improving can be, frequently, seen.
Intra-articular injection of an autologous preparation rich in growth factors for the treatment
of knee OA: a retrospective cohort study.
Evans CH. Center for Molecular Orthopaedics, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115, USA. cevans@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
Utilizing the patient’s own blood, platelets can be collected, under centrifugal force, into a
highly concentrated formula I3I with parallel concentration of Growth Factors.
Growth factors may enhance current cartilage repair techniques via multiple mechanisms
including recruitment of chondrogenic cells (chemotaxis), stimulation of chondrogenic cell
proliferation (mitogenesis) and enhancement of cartilage matrix synthesis I4I. Two growth
factors that have been studied in cartilage repair are insulin-like growth factor 1(IGF-1) and
platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) but, also, bFGF, EGF, VEGF, TGF-beta and BMP-2 and 7,
showed positive effects on hyaline cartilage. IGF plays a key role in cartilage homeostasis,
balancing proteoglycan synthesis and breakdown. PDGF is a potent mitogenic and chemotactic
factor for all cells of mesenchymal origin, including chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells.
Resting zone chondrocytes cultured with PDGF demonstrated increased cell proliferation and
proteoglycan production I5I. Many studies suggest a potential role for these potent biological
regulators of chondrocytes in cartilage repair I6I.
Between 2004 and 2008, 69 official football players, 61 males and 8 females, with a mean age
of 26.0 (16 – 39) years, with chronic, limited (< 3 cm2), chondral symptomatic lesion of the
knee, without other relevant pathology, were submitted to surgery, by the same surgeon, and
grouped in 3 different series, concerning treatment. The major symptoms were pain, swelling
(SWE) and functional disability (FI), with different incidence between the 3 groups, and the
internal condyle (IC) was the most affected in all 3 groups (Table 2).
Outerbridge classification I7I was used to classify the severity of the injury (table 1). The first
group of 23 players (Group 1 – MF+AGF) was treated with micro fractures associated with PRP
(autologous growth factors) using the GPS II (Gravitational Platelet Separation System) for
platelets separation and the injuries were mostly grade II and III. The second group (Group 2 –
MF) was treated with micro fractures, alone, and the severity of injuries was mostly grade I
and II. The third group (Group 3 – AB), grade I and II, limited injuries were treated only by
abrasoplasty. The objectives of this work were to demonstrate, using an adequate sore scale,
the validity of the arthroscopic micro fracture ( MF ) treatment in combination with autologous
growth factors ( AGF ) for knee chondral lesions in soccer players. All the players had an x-ray
(some of them had an MRI) study before surgery and we utilised the CDSS ( Chondral Defect
Scoring Scale) as chosen study to analyse the subjective and objective results I8I
We begin with multiple perforations with 3-4 mm diameter and 6 - 8 mm deep, using our own
awls (Fig. 1). The difficulty of PRP application, in micro-fractures site, during arthroscopic
procedure, took us to a new application technique, named by the authors the “multi-needle
application technique”, in which we reference the micro fracture site with multiple 14 or 16
mm catheters, allowing the individual injection of PRP in each individual micro fracture hole
(Fig. 2).
Some of instilled PRP will stay in articular space which, is probed, to have a positive effect on
post operative pain, swelling and range of motion.
A B
C
Fig. 2 - The multi – needle application technique. A Catheter`s angulations in order to reach
the throclear injury. B The arthroscopic image of multiple catheters. C The extra articular
image of the technique.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using software SPSS (versions 14.0 and 16.0). The
statistical significance levels used were 1% and 5%.
An exploratory analysis was first used. Means, standard deviations and confidence intervals at
a 95% confidence interval were calculated for CDSS, in each period and separately for each
group one of the three groups.
Imagiolog examinations
The results of x-ray, and in some cases MRI, show a better defect image, according with clinical
improvement (Fig 3)
A B
Fig. 6 - X-ray evolution of one of the study cases. A Before surgery B After 18 months
Discussion
According with treatment options, regarding severity of the cases, the results were, globally
good or very good in clinical and return to competition aspects (Fig 4). The multiple
comparative tests applied detected differences between group 1 and both groups 2 and 3.
Thus, group 1 registered a CDSS evolution, on an average, significantly superior to groups 2 e 3
registered evolutions.
A B
Different statistics methodologies applied are complementary and show corroborative results
between them. Group 1 distinguishes itself clearly from the other two groups. Group 1
(MF+AGF) registers CDSS mean values, before treatment, below the other two groups.
Nevertheless, regarding mean CDSS 18 months after treatment, Group 1 inversely shows
superior values in relation with the other two groups. All the groups show an increase in CDSS
mean values over time, but CDSS progress in group 1 is much higher than the ingrowths for the
other two groups. The injuries were classified according Outerbridge classification and the
results were validated with Chondral Defect Scoring Scale(CDSS), clinical and imagiologic
evaluation.
The present study demonstrates that the micro fractures associated with PRP (Autologous
Growth Factors) had mean CDSS scores at 18 months significantly (p<0.01) better than the
other two groups, although the mean values, before treatment, were above the other two
groups. The clinical and imagiologic findings show a good or very good evolution with return to
competition, the same level, in 91 % of the cases.
Conclusions
Despite the insufficiency of this study, still in progress regarding sample characteristics and
number of patients, it seems that, based on clinical findings ( CDSS) and imaging studies that
MF is a reasonable first approach treatment of limited chondral defects ( degenerative or
traumatic ), even for football players. Return to competition it possible in an average of 3.5 to
4 months. The introduction of complementary AGF to the technique of MF seems to improve
the percentage of good results comparing with other groups, and literature, on MF alone. The
statistical data analysis, applying several complementary methodologies, show that MF
associated with GF presents a better CDSS evolution than the other groups of treatment. In
cases of, Outerbridge grade I e II symptomatic, limited, lesions, the treatment could be the
traditional Abrasoplasty and/or Micro fractures, alone, but , mostly in grade II, the association
of AGF gives a better prognosis and is highly recommended . In cases of, Outerbridge grade III,
and even IV, symptomatic, limited lesions the treatment should be Micro fractures in
association with PRP (Autologous Growth Factors).
References
1. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG. Outcomes of
microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up.
Arthroscopy. 2003;19:477-484.
2. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep
cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J
Med. 1994;331:889-895.
3. Bugbee WD, Convery FR. Osteochondral allograft transplantation. Clin Sports Med.
1999;18:67-75.
4. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, et. al. The microfracture technique for the
treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1911-1920.
5. Mithoefer K, Peterson L, Mandelbaum BR, Minas T. Articular cartilage repair in soccer
players with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: functional outcome and return
to competition. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1147-1153.
6. Cole BJ, Dhanaraj S, Lu EY, et al. Minced autologous articular cartilage versus cartilage
bone paste: investigation of a novel single-stage approach for the treatment of
cartilage defects. Program and abstracts of the American Orthopaedic Society of
Sports Medicine Annual Meeting; July 14-17, 2005; Keystone, Colorado.
7. Ho SS, Luo J, Haydon R, et al. Characterization of chondrocyte scaffold carriers for cell-
based gene therapy in articular cartilage repair. Program and abstracts of the
American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting; July 14-17, 2005;
Keystone, Colorado.
8. Potter HG. Symposium: MRI-T2 mapping [of articular cartilage]. Program and abstracts
of the American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting; July 14-17,
2005; Keystone, Colorado.
9. Chu CR, Lin D, Geisler JL, Chu CT, Fu FH, Pan Y. Arthroscopic microscopy of articular
cartilage using optical coherence tomography. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:699-709.
10. Herrmann JM, Pitris C, Bouma BE, et al. High resolution imaging of normal and
osteoarthritic cartilage with optical coherence tomography. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:627-
635.
11. Guillen P, Abelow SP, Jaen TF. Matrix/membranous autologous chondrocyte
implantation for the treatment of large chondral defects of the knee and ankle.
Program and abstracts of the American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine Annual
Meeting; July 14-17, 2005; Keystone, Colorado.
12. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Singleton SB, Briggs KK (1997) Microfracture technique for
full-thickness chondral defects: technique and clinical results. Oper Tech Orthop
7:300–304
13. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ (2001) Microfracture: surgical technique and
rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop 391:362–369
14. Blevins FT, Steadman JR, Rodrigo JJ, Silliman J (1998) Treatment of articular cartilage
defects in athletes: an analysis of functional outcome and lesion appereance.
Orthopaedics 21:761–768
15. Rodrigo JJ, Steadman JR, Silliman JF, Fulstone HA (1994) Improvement of full-thickness
chondral defect healing in the human knee after debridement and microfracture using
continuous passive motion. Am J Knee Surg 7:109–116
16. R. G. Marx, J. Connor, S. Lyman, A. Amendola, J. T. Andrish, C. Kaeding, E. C. McCarty,
R. D. Parker, R. W. Wright, K. P. Spindler, et al.
Multirater Agreement of Arthroscopic Grading of Knee Articular Cartilage
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 33(11): 1654 - 1657.
17. S. D. Kendell, C. A. Helms, J. W. Rampton, W. E. Garrett, and L. D. Higgins
MRI Appearance of Chondral Delamination Injuries of the Knee
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1486 - 1489.
18.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 31:83-86 (2003)© 2003 American
Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Reproducibility and Reliability of the
Outerbridge Classification for Grading Chondral Lesions of the Knee
Arthroscopically.Michelle L. Cameron, MD, Karen K. Briggs, MBA and J. Richard
Steadman, MD*
19. Articular cartilage defects: study of 25,124 knee arthroscopies.Widuchowski W,
Widuchowski J, Trzaska T.Department of the Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy and Sports
Traumatology of the District Hospital of Traumatology, ul. Bytomska 62, 41-940
Piekary Slaskie, Poland. sportmed@sportmed.com.pl
20. Articular cartilage regeneration in the knee. Knee reconstruction Current Opinion in
Orthopedics. 19(1):37-43, January 2008.McAdams, Timothy R a; Mandelbaum, Bert R b
21. Growth factors and cartilage repair.van den Berg WB, van der Kraan PM, Scharstuhl A,
van Beuningen HM.Rheumatology Research Laboratory, University Medical Center,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
22. Regulation of cartilage growth by growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I Olle
G.P. Isaksson, Çlaes Ohlsson, Anders Nilson, Jorgen Isgaard and Anders Lindahl.
Gothenburg, Sweden
23. Daniel W.W. (1990) Applied Nonparametric Statistics 2nd Edition. Duxbury.
24. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL (2006) Multivariate Data Analysis
6th Edition. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall. 555-628