Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
RESOLUTION Project
IST - 026851
Document Information
Type Report
Security Public
Summary
This report presents the results of design of antennas and antenna arrays for High-
Precision-Localization-System. Several structures, meeting particular requirements of the
system, have been designed, realized and measured. Depending on the system
configuration different types of antennas have been proposed for the base stations and
mobile terminals in the system. Antennas realized as planar structures have been preferred
due to their advantages: easy fabrication and integration with Tx/Rx modules, low profile
and lightweight.
Also analysis of dependence of distance determination error in localization system based on
time of arrival measurements, on beam width of antenna radiation pattern has been
presented. Using narrow beam antennas some multipath components with small delays,
causing errors of calculation of distance between antennas, can be eliminated and accuracy
of the system can be increased. This improvement depends on detection method
implemented in the system. When leading edge detection, resistant to multipath
propagation, is used influence of antenna radiation characteristics is smaller.
Table of contents
SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................. 2
1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 3
2 PROJECT AND REALIZATION OF SINGLE ANTENNAS ......................................... 7
2.1 OPTIMISATION PROCEDURE APPLIED TO DESIGNING PROCESS ....................................... 7
2.2 PROJECT OF E-SHAPED PATCH ANTENNA ................................................................... 8
2.3 PROJECT OF ELLIPTICALLY POLARIZED CIRCULAR PATCH ANTENNA ................................ 10
2.4 PROJECT OF MONOPOLE ANTENNA ......................................................................... 16
2.5 PROJECT OF PLANAR ANTENNA WITH CIRCULAR SLOT ................................................. 19
2.6 PROJECT OF BOW-TIE ANTENNA ............................................................................ 23
2.7 PROJECT OF INVERTED-F ANTENNA ....................................................................... 26
3 PROJECT AND REALIZATION OF ANTENNA ARRAYS......................................... 29
3.1 4-ELEMENT SWITCHED ARRAY .............................................................................. 29
3.2 SEMICIRCULAR ARRAY OF 4 E-SHAPED PATCH ANTENNAS ........................................... 30
3.3 LINEAR ARRAY OF 4 E-SHAPED PATCH ANTENNAS ..................................................... 32
3.4 SEMICIRCULAR ARRAY OF 8 CIRCULAR PLANAR ANTENNAS WITH ELLIPTICAL POLARIZATION
33
3.5 2×2 ARRAY OF MONOPOLE ANTENNA ..................................................................... 36
3.6 2×2 ARRAY OF PLANAR ANTENNAS WITH CIRCULAR SLOT ........................................... 38
3.7 TWO INVERTED-F ANTENNAS ............................................................................... 42
4 ANTENNAS FEEDING INTERFACES ................................................................... 45
5 ANALYSIS OF ANTENNA BEAM WIDTH INFLUENCE ON DISTANCE ERROR
MEASUREMENT ..................................................................................................... 46
6 CONCLUSION................................................................................................... 53
7 REFERENCES.................................................................................................... 54
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 3
1 Introduction
Antenna is an important element of each radio transmission system. The use of proper
antennas, with appropriate radiation pattern, can improve the system performance, allowing
to eliminate some unwanted interfering signals and increase quality of the signal reception.
Different characteristics of antenna can be necessary for the transmitter and the receiver
side, depending on of wireless system configuration. Topology of the considered indoor
localization system is presented in Fig. 1.1. System consists of stationary base stations (BS)
and mobile stations (STA). The BSs serve as absolute spatial references for the mobile
STAs. System architecture of proposed High Precision Localization System (HPLS) is
described in details in [1]. Two modes of the system operation are considered in the
RESOLUTION:
• bi-directional down- and up-link transmission between BS and STA, with active reflector
in STA. Each BS sequentially realizes communication with chosen STA, and then position
of the STA is calculated in the central station of the system. Such procedure is repeated
for each STA in area of system coverage.
• unidirectional down-link transmission from BS to STA (concept similar to GPS). All STAs
receive signals transmitted sequentially by the BSs and then each of STA calculates its
position.
Two types of the mobile terminals are foreseen to be used in the system, depending on
application:
• larger terminals mounted on vehicles for Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) applications
• small terminals integrated with Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) or mobile handsets for
interactive guiding applications
Additionally localization terminal can be integrated with WLAN terminal to assure localization
and communication applications in one system.
Depending on system configuration and side of antenna placement different types of
antenna are preferred. The BS antenna shall to assure coverage of considered area
(typically single room in the building to assure line-of-sight LOS conditions for transmission
to STA), so for BSs placed on walls sector antennas can be used. For the STA the antenna
with omnidirectional radiation pattern in azimuth plane should be used to allow realize
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 4
Fig. 1.2 Frequency range exploited in RESOLUTION project for localization and
communications systems.
During the realization of the project the concept of the system has been changed. To make
the proposed solution more universal and allowing to use other communication systems i.e.
WLANs working in 2.4 GHZ band, the use of two separate antennas for communications and
localization has been decided, during the project meeting in Athens in December 2006 [3].
In this case for localization system narrowband antennas, working in frequency range
5.725-5.875 GHz (Fig. 1.3), will be used. Only antennas for HPLS have been considered in
this case.
5.725GHz 5.875GHz
Fig. 1.3 Frequency range exploited in RESOLUTION project for localization system only.
Antennas designed for the HPLS during the RESOLUTION project are presented in Fig. 1.4
and antenna arrays are presented in Fig. 1.5. All of the antennas and arrays are described
in further part of the document.
Planar antennas - microstrip patch antenna, planar dipole antenna, circular slot antenna -
are expected to satisfy requirements due to its conformability to mounting in system and
other eligible features – easy fabrication, low profile and light weight.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 5
a) b) c)
d) e) f)
Fig. 1.4 Single element antennas designed for Work Package 3 of RESOLUTION project.
a) E-shaped wideband patch antenna, b) Elliptically polarized circular patch antenna, c)
Monopole antenna, d) Planar antenna with circular slot, e) Bow-tie antenna, f) Inverted-F
antenna.
a) b) c)
d) e) f)
g)
Fig. 1.5 Antenna arrays designed for Work Package 3 of RESOLUTION project. a) 4-element
switched array of E-shaped patch antennas, b) Semicircular array of 4 E-shaped patch
antennas, c) Linear array of 4 E-shaped patch antennas, d) Semicircular array of 8 circular
planar antennas with elliptical polarization, e) 2×2 array of monopole antenna, f) 2×2 array
of planar antennas with circular slot, g) Two inverted-F antennas.
For the base station (BS) antenna in the case of system with bidirectional transmission
between BS and STA, semicircular array of 4 or 8 antennas are considered to be the
optimum solution. That antenna allows adaptive beam forming and following the STA with
the beam. As a single element in the array E-shaped patch antenna for wideband
applications or circular patch antenna for narrowband applications have been chosen.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 6
In the case of system concept using only down-link transmission from BS to STA, wide-
beam or sector antenna seems to be optimum solution for BSs, because STA tracking is
unnecessary. Also elliptical polarization has been taken into account for transmission
improvement – odd-reflected rays are suppressed in that case. Thus elliptically polarized
antenna has been designed and semicircular array of such antennas has been proposed.
For mobile stations (STA) mounted on vehicles or large objects different types of antennas
have been considered as optimum solutions:
• single monopole antenna for wideband solution
• single planar antenna with circular slot for narrow band solution
• 4-element switched array of E-shaped wideband patch antennas
• 2×2 array of monopole or planar antenna with circular slot
In case of transmission with elliptically polarized waves, arrays of elliptically polarized patch
antennas will be used.
However if the mobile station is integrated in mobile handset (PDA), small, omnidirectional
antenna is needed. For that purpose small and very flat bow-tie antenna and inverted-F
antenna have been designed. The frequency band of these antennas is adequate for the
narrow bandwidth of the localization system.
All of proposed antennas will work covered. Covering materials and mounting boxes may
have influence on antenna parameters. Thus final project of antenna needs to be verified
with external elements taken into account.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 7
Fig. 2.1 The optimisation procedure applied for E-shaped patch antenna design.
Optimisation takes significant amount of time. Each iteration typically takes half an hour up
to a few hours on a single-processor workstation. Single optimisation procedure needs
about 20 up to several hundred iterations to find a solution, depending on structure
complexity, number of optimised variables and starting point of optimisation. Typically
optimisation procedure takes one or two days, but if it fails to find acceptable solution the
procedure needs to be executed again.
By using two simulation environments based on different methods for designing purposes,
self-verification route is able to be introduced, just before physical realization and
measurement verification will be executed.
Other verification method, feasible over designing stage, is to re-simulate the structure
using the same computation environment but applying higher mesh density in order to get
more accurately structure mapping and field represent.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 8
Fig. 2.2 Structure of E-shaped patch antenna, top view and side view.
Z pa wa w2 wb pb
Y
θ
gmy
gmx gmx
φ width
la lb
X dp
gm
y
a) b)
Fig. 2.3 Coordinates (a) and symbols designation (b) for E-shaped patch antenna.
Parameter Value
laminate RO3003
substrate thickness 1.524 mm
substrate permittivity 3.00
substrate conductance 0.0014 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
metal conductance 5.847e7 S/m
gmx 7.00 mm
gmy 10.00 mm
width 14.05 mm
pa = pb 13.40 mm
wa = wb 1.55 mm
w2 4.25 mm
la = lb 8.55 mm
dp 2.25 mm
Tab. 2.1 Parameters of the structure shown in the Fig. 2.2.
Following figures show measurements results. Fig. 2.5 presents reflection coefficient of the
designed antenna. There is good agreement between results of measurement and
simulation. Frequency bands coincide in both cases as well as resonance frequencies.
However there is –8.17dB reflection provided in the considered frequency band in
comparison with –10dB obtained in the simulation.
Fig. 2.5 Reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.2.
Fig. 2.6 and Fig. 2.7 show radiation pattern of the antenna. Good agreement between
simulation and measurements can be also observed.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 10
90 |E|/|Emax| 90|E|/|Emax|
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
240
Measured 300 240
Measured 300
Simulated 270 Simulated 270
a) b)
Fig. 2.6 XZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.2 at 5.5
GHz. a) Co-polarization, b) cross-polarization.
|E|/|Emax| |E|/|Emax|
90 90
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
240
Measured 300 240
Measured 300
Simulated 270 Simulated 270
a) b)
Fig. 2.7 YZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.2 at 5.5
GHz. a) Co-polarization, b) cross-polarization.
The antenna is optimised to work in system based on first concept with wide frequency
band. The antenna array based on E-shaped patch is described in further part of document.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 11
transmitter and the receiver some multipath components received after odd number of
reflections can be attenuated.
The antenna presented in the Fig. 2.9 and Fig. 2.8 contains circular patch with oblique slot
as a diversity element. The antenna is fed directly from semi-rigid coax cable. Optimisation
procedure has been using four variables in order to get appropriate radiation characteristics:
patch diameter, slot length, rotation of slot and feed location. The goal function was defined
as a combination of reflection coefficient value in the frequency band and circularity of
polarization for the straight direction (direction of axis Z). Tab. 2.2 contains parameters and
dimensions of designed antenna.
Z X
X Y
Fig. 2.9 Circular patch with oblique slot, top view and side view.
Parameter Value
laminate RO3003
substrate thickness 1.524 mm
substrate permittivity 3.00
substrate conductance 0.0014 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
metal conductance 5.847e +007 S/m
antenna feed RG-405, semi-rigid
substrate dimensions 32 mm × 32 mm
patch diameter 15.45 mm
slot dimensions 6.85 mm × 0.7 mm
rotation of slot 50.2° (from X-axis)
feed point location 3.075 mm
(distance from the
Tab. 2.2 Parameters of the structure shown in the Fig. 2.9.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 12
Fig. 2.10 presents ellipses of polarization at three frequencies: at limits and at centre of
frequency band. Shapes of ellipses are almost circular, however their shape changes with
frequency. The quotient of ellipse axes equals 0.76, 0.71 and 0.44 for three considered
frequencies respectively. Obtained values permit to achieve benefits of polarization effects
(i.e. suppression of certain multipath components).
1,5
0,5
f = 5.725 GHz
f = 5.8 GHz
Ephi
0
f = 5.875 GHz
-2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1 1,5 2
Axes of ellipse
-0,5
-1
-1,5
-2
Etheta
Fig. 2.10 Ellipses of polarization for Z-axis radiation for the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.9.
The antenna has been manufactured, Fig. 2.11 presents matrix of antennas on the sheet of
laminate. The antenna is fed directly from semi-rigid coax cable. Fig. 2.12 shows performed
structure.
Fig. 2.13 shows reflection coefficient of the designed antenna. There are some differences
between simulation and measurement (i.e. resonance frequencies slightly drifted away), but
demanded reflection coefficient inside considered frequency band is still kept. The frequency
band at –10dB reflection coefficient level is much wider then it was assumed, however there
are also other parameters (i.e. polarization parameters), which changes with frequency and
needs to be maintained in the assumed frequency band. It will be discussed hereunder.
-5
-10
]
B
d[
|
1
1
S| -15
-20
Measured
Simulated
Demanded
-25
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 2.13 Reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.9.
Fig. 2.14 and Fig. 2.15 present XZ and YZ cross-section of radiation pattern of the antenna
respectively. It is necessary to know phase pattern in order to determine polarization of the
antenna. Thus phase patterns have been measured as well as amplitude pattern.
Measured amplitudes of field components are not equal, as expected according to the
simulation results. It means that oblique slot used as a diversity element does not work
exactly like simulation predicted. Probably antenna could be performed imprecisely.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 14
90 |E|/|Emax| 90 |E|/|Emax|
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
240
Measured 300 240
Measured 300
Simulated 270 Simulated 270
a) b)
-100 400
300
-150
200
-200 100
0
] -250 ]
g g
e e
d[ d[ -100
e e
s -300 s
a a
h h -200
P P
-350 -300
-400
-400
Measured -500 Measured
Simulated Simulated
-450 -600
-180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 -180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Theta [deg] Theta [deg]
c) d)
Fig. 2.14 XZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.9 at
5.8 GHz. Amplitude of E-component orthogonal (a) / parallel (b) to the cross-section plane.
Phase of E-component orthogonal (c) / parallel (d) to the cross-section plane.
90
|E|/|Emax| 90
|E|/|Emax|
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
240
Measured 300 240
Measured 300
Simulated 270 Simulated 270
a) b)
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 15
0 100
-100
0
-200
-300 -100
] -400 ]
g g
e e
d[ d[ -200
e -500 e
s s
a a
h h
P P
-600 -300
-700
-400
-800 Measured Measured
Simulated Simulated
-900 -500
-180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 -180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Theta [deg] Theta [deg]
c) d)
Fig. 2.15 YZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.9 at
5.8 GHz. Amplitude of E-component parallel (a) / orthogonal (b) to the cross-section plane.
Phase of E-component parallel (c) / orthogonal (d) to the cross-section plane.
Measured amplitude and phase patterns were used in order to determine quality of
polarization. It was assumed that quality of polarization is represented by circular ratio
(CR), defined as ratio of minor axis to major axis of ellipse of polarization (please refer to
the Fig. 2.10). CR falls into the range from 0 to 1. In case of linear polarization CR equals 0,
in case of circular polarization CR equals 1. All values between 0 and 1 relate to the elliptical
polarization.
Fig. 2.16 shows circular ratio versus frequency for the wave propagating in the main
direction (along Z axis). Measured CR reaches maximum value for the centre frequency of
the antenna (5.8 GHz), and exceeds 0,56 in the considered frequency band. It is very good
result, especially taking into account some differences between simulation and
measurements of reflection coefficient and radiation pattern.
1
Measurement
0.9 Simulation
Frequency band
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
R
C
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 2.16 Circular ratio vs. frequency for the main direction.
Designed antenna radiates in wide range of directions and thus it is not enough to
determine CR value for main direction. Fig. 2.17 presents measured CR values versus
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 16
direction for two main planes (XZ and YZ). Presented results are absolutely satisfying – high
CR values are held on in very wide range of angle values in both planes.
1
XZ plane
0.9 YZ plane
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
R
C
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-180 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180
Theta [deg]
Fig. 2.17 Circular ratio vs. theta at 5.8 GHz for XZ and YZ-plane cross-section.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 17
Z X
X Y
Fig. 2.18 Structure of single monopole antenna, top view and side view (in scale 1:1).
Parameter Value
monopole length 11.7 mm (0.226 λ)
monopole diameter 1.28 mm (0.025 λ)
ground plane 40 mm × 40 mm × 0.5 mm
Tab. 2.3 Parameters of the structure shown in the Fig. 2.19.
The antenna has been modelled and calculated in electromagnetic simulator QuickWave 3D.
Fig. 2.20 presents reflection coefficient of the antenna. Distinctive feature of the simulated
structure is frequency band much higher than required.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 18
-5
-10
]
B
d[
-15
-20
|S11|
|S11| demanded
-25
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 2.20 Reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.18.
Fig. 2.21 and Fig. 2.22 show radiation pattern of the antenna. Obtained results are typical
for the monopole on the ground antenna. The radiation pattern is omnidirectional. Side- and
back-radiation result from finite ground plane dimensions and is desirable in the considered
application. XZ cross-section of radiation pattern is almost the same as at the plane of
phi=45°.
90
2 |E|/|E I|
120 60
1.5
150 1 30
0.5
ϕ
180 0
|E |, θ = 90°
θ
|E |, θ = 75°
θ
210|E |, θ = 60° 330
θ
|E |, θ = 45°
θ
|E |, θ = 90°
ϕ
|E |, θ = 75°
ϕ
|E |, θ = 60°
240 300
ϕ
|E |, θ = 45°
ϕ 270
Fig. 2.21 Radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.18 at the surface of constant
value of theta at 5.8 GHz. The spherical system coordinates are presented next to the
figure.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 19
θ 0 θ 0
30 330 30 330
60 300 60 300
|E|/|EI| |E|/|EI|
2 2
1.5 1 1.5 1
0.5 0.5
90 270 90 270
θ 0 θ 0
30 330 30 330
60 300 60 300
|E|/|EI| |E|/|EI|
2 2
1.5 1 1.5 1
0.5 0.5
90 270 90 270
Fig. 2.22 Cross-sections of radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.18 a) at the
plane of phi=0°, b) at the plane of phi=45°, c) at the plane of phi=90°, d) at the plane of
phi=135°.
a) Z X
Z
b)
X Y c)
Fig. 2.23 Structure of single planar antenna with circular slot (in scale 1:1): a) top view; b)
side view; c) 3-D view
Parameter Value
laminate RO3003
substrate thickness 1.524 mm
substrate permittivity 3.023
substrate conductance 0.0014 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
metal conductance 5.847e7 S/m
antenna feed RG-405, semi-rigid
circular patch diameter 31.9 mm
slot size 1.0 mm
length of side of vias 40.0 mm × 40.0 mm
rectangle
vias radius 0.25 mm
substrate dimensions 45 mm × 45 mm
Tab. 2.4 Parameters of the structure shown in the Fig. 2.23.
Fig. 2.24 shows reflection coefficient of the designed antenna. The frequency band is
narrower than the frequency band of monopole antenna, but still satisfying requirements.
Radiation pattern in the frequency band is almost the same.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 21
-5
-10
]
B
d[
-15
-20
|S11|
|S11| demanded
-25
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 2.24 Reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.23.
The antenna has been performed and measured, Fig. 2.25 presents one of performed
antennas.
Fig. 2.25 Performed structure of single planar antenna with circular slot.
Fig. 2.26 presents results of measured reflection coefficient for two performed antennas. For
both antennas the resonant frequency is shifted from 5.8 GHz to ca. 6.0 GHz.
In order to find the reason of this disagreement further simulation has been executed. The
structure has been simulated again in the QuickWave 3D environment but using higher
mesh density (200 cells per wavelength in the dielectric instead of 100 cells per wavelength
in the dielectric). Also there was performed simulation of the same structure in FEKO
electromagnetic simulator. All of the simulation results are presented in Fig. 2.27.
Simulation results presented in Fig. 2.27Fig. 1.1 allow drawing conclusion that mesh density
used in simulations has been not enough for that purpose, nevertheless density 100 cells
per wavelength is commonly sufficient in the most of simulated electromagnetic problems.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 22
-5
-10
] -15
B
d[
-20
Fig. 2.26 Measured reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.23 and Fig.
2.25.
-5
-10
] -15
B
d[
Fig. 2.27 Measured and simulated reflection coefficient the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.23
and Fig. 2.25. Figure presents measured reflection coefficient of two pieces of performed
antennas as well as simulation results obtained on the QuickWave 3D software at 100 and
200 cells per wave length inside dielectric and simulation results obtained on the FEKO
electromagnetic simulator.
Fig. 2.28 shows measured and simulated XZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern at 5.8
GHz. Results are roughly similar. Differences in the back radiation results from an antenna
under test mounting system.
Parameters of the antenna are optimal in order to applying the structure in mobile stations
in the system. In particular, upraised radiation pattern is very adequate for system with
highly located base stations. The radiation pattern causes reduction of rays reflected from
the floor.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 23
θ 0
30 330
60 300
120 240
|E | measured
θ
|E | measured
ϕ
|E | simulated
θ 150 210
|Eϕ | simulated
180
Fig. 2.28 Measured and simulated XZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern of the
antenna shown in the Fig. 2.23 and Fig. 2.25 at 5.8 GHz.
Z X
Fig. 2.29 Structure of bow-tie antenna, top view.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 24
Substrate of the antenna is high frequency laminate with reinforced woven glass in to
ensure greater mechanical strength for very thin layer (0.254 mm). Dimensions of the
structure have been chosen first accordingly to the centre operating frequency 5.8 GHz, and
then have been optimised in order to minimize reflection coefficient within the operating
frequency band. Fig. 2.31 shows symbols designations for structure dimensions, and Tab.
2.5 contains parameters of designed antenna.
sx
d dl
dw
l5
w3
l3 l4
w1
sy
rc rb
l2
l1
w2
w1
Parameter Value
laminate RO3203
substrate thickness 0.254 mm
substrate permittivity 3.00
substrate conductance 0.0016 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 25
Fig. 2.32 shows simulated reflection coefficient of the designed antenna. Fig. 2.33 and Fig.
2.34 present simulated radiation pattern of the antenna. The antenna will be performed in
the nearest future in order to confirm simulation results.
-5
-10
] -15
B
d[
-20
-25
|S11| simulated
|S11| demanded
-30
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 2.32 Reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 2.29.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 26
90
2 |E|/|EI|
120 60
1.5
150 1 30
0.5
ϕ
180 0
|E | @ f = 5.725 GHz
ϕ
|E | @ f = 5.8 GHz
210 ϕ 330
|E | @ f = 5.875 GHz
ϕ
|E | @ f = 5.725 GHz
θ
|E | @ f = 5.8 GHz
θ 240 300
|Eθ| @ f = 5.875 GHz
270
Fig. 2.33 XY-plane cross-section of radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.29. The
spherical system coordinates are presented next to the figure.
θ 0 θ 0
30 330 30 330
60 300 60 300
|E|/|EI| |E|/|EI|
2 2
1.5 1 1.5 1
0.5 0.5
90 27090 270
Fig. 2.34 Radiation pattern of antenna shown in the Fig. 2.29. a) YZ-plane cross-section of
radiation pattern, b) XZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 27
that goes through both dielectric substrates and ground plane. Fig. 2.35 shows antenna
geometry.
φ
X
Fig. 2.35 IFA antenna geometry and coordinate system used in radiation pattern plots.
Structure has been optimised in order to have 5.8 GHz centre frequency and later to
achieve wide bandwidth. Area below antenna is not grounded. FR4 substrate and ground
plane are 10 mm shorter than RO3203 substrate. Antenna utilizes two pins. One of them is
used to feed the antenna (left one in Fig. 1) and another to ground the antenna to the
ground plane. In Fig. 2.36 structure dimensions are presented. In Tab. 2.6 detailed
parameters of used substrate can be found.
80
0.3
32.6
6.7
10
100 100
1.5
Fig. 2.36 IFA antenna: dimensions of the antenna and dimensions of structure where
antenna is placed
Parameter Value
laminate RO3203
substrate thickness 0.3 mm
substrate permittivity 3.00
substrate conductance 0.0016 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 28
Fig. 2.37 shows simulated antenna input reflection coefficient, and Fig. 2.38 shows
simulated antenna radiation patterns.
Fig. 2.37 Input reflection coefficient of designed IFA antenna. With grey background
demanded bandwidth is marked.
Θ 0° Θ 0°
-15° 15° -15° 15°
-30° 30° |E | @ f = 5.725 GHz -30° 30° |E | @ f = 5.725 GHz
Θ Θ
|E | @ f = 5.800 GHz |E | @ f = 5.800 GHz
-45° |E|/|EI| 45° Θ -45° 45° Θ
|EΘ| @ f = 5.875 GHz |EΘ| @ f = 5.875 GHz
|E | @ f = 5.725 GHz |E|/|EI| |E | @ f = 5.725 GHz
φ φ
-60° 60° -60° 60°
|E | @ f = 5.800 GHz |E | @ f = 5.800 GHz
φ φ
|E | @ f = 5.875 GHz |E | @ f = 5.875 GHz
φ φ
1 1.2
-135° 135° -135° 135°
a) b)
90°
105° 75°
120° 60° |E | @ f = 5.725 GHz
Θ
|E | @ f = 5.800 GHz
135° 45° Θ
|EΘ| @ f = 5.875 GHz
|E|/|EI| |E | @ f = 5.725 GHz
φ
150° 30°
|E | @ f = 5.800 GHz
φ
|E | @ f = 5.875 GHz
φ
165° 15°
1.6 φ
1.2
0.8 0.4
± 180° 0°
-165° -15°
-150° -30°
-135° -45°
-120° -60°
-105° -75°
-90°
c)
Fig. 2.38 Radiation pattern of antenna shown in Fig. 2.35. a) YZ-plane cross-section. b)
XZ-plane cross-section. c) XY-plane cross-section.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 29
Fig. 3.1 Structure of 4-element switched array for mobile reflector in HPLS: a) electrical
structure of the array; b) mechanical structure of the array; c) dimensions of pyramid side.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 30
Fig. 3.3 Radiation patterns of 4-element switched pyramid array: a) in azimuth plane; b) in
elevation plane.
Fig. 3.4 Structure of 4-element adaptive array for BS in HPLS: a) electrical structure of the
array; b) mechanical structure of the array; c) dimensions of the array.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 31
Fig. 3.5 Measured radiation pattern of single antennas in the array: a) antenna 1; b)
antenna 2; c) antenna 3; d) antenna 4.
Fig. 3.6 Radiation pattern of 4-element adaptive array for equal amplitude and phase
combining.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 32
1 2 3 4
Fig. 3.7 Linear antenna array built out of four E-shaped patches.
0 0
-2 -2
-4 -4
-6 -6
-8 -8
-10 -10
] ]
B -12 B -12
d[ d[
| |
1 -14 1 -14
1 1
S| S|
-16 -16
-18 -18
-20 -20
-22 -22
-24 -24
-25 -25
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
frequency [GHz] frequency [GHz]
Antenna 1 Antenna 2
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 33
0 0
-2 -2
-4 -4
-6 -6
-8 -8
-10 -10
] ]
B -12 B -12
d[ d[
| |
1 -14 1 -14
1 1
S| S|
-16 -16
-18 -18
-20 -20
-22 -22
-24 -24
-25 -25
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
frequency [GHz] frequency [GHz]
Antenna 3 Antenna 4
Fig. 3.8 Reflection coefficient of particular E-shaped antennas.
Fig. 3.9 Semicircular antenna array built out of eight circular patches with oblique slots.
Analogically to the linear array measurements describer in the previous chapter, reflection
coefficient as well as radiation pattern of four of eight antennas were measured. Central
antennas of the array were chosen for measurements. Measurements results and synthesize
radiation patterns are presented in Fig. 3.10 - Fig. 3.14.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 34
0 0
-5 -5
-10 -10
] ]
B B
d[ d[
| |
1 1
1 1
S| -15 S| -15
-20 -20
-25 -25
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
frequency [GHz] frequency [GHz]
Antenna 3 Antenna 4
0 0
-5 -5
-10 -10
] ]
B B
d[ d[
| |
1 1
1 1
S| -15 S| -15
-20 -20
-25 -25
5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7
frequency [GHz] frequency [GHz]
Antenna 5 Antenna 6
Fig. 3.10 Reflection coefficient of particular circular antennas.
90 90
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 35
90 90
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
90 90
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
90 90
1 1
120 60 120 60
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
150 30 150 30
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
180 0 180 0
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 36
4 3
1 2
Y
Z X
X Y
Fig. 3.15 Structure of quadruple monopole antenna, top view and side view (in scale 1:1).
Parameter Value
monopole length 11.7 mm (0.226 λ)
monopole diameter 1.28 mm (0.025 λ)
monopole distance 40.0 mm (0.77 λ)
ground plane 80 mm × 80 mm × 0.5 mm
Tab. 3.1 Parameters of the structure shown in the Fig. 2.25.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 37
Fig. 3.17 shows simulated reflection coefficient and mutual transmission between integral
radiators. Reflection coefficient is similar to the one for single monopole antenna and mutual
transmission is less than –16 dB in the considered frequency band.
-5
-10
|S11|
] |S21| = |S41|
B |S31|
d[
-15 |S11| demanded
-20
-25
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 3.17 Reflection coefficient and mutual transmission of the antenna shown in the Fig.
3.15.
Fig. 3.18 and Fig. 3.19 show radiation pattern of the first monopole of the antenna. The
result of greater ground plane area and monopoles situated out of the ground centre is that
radiation pattern is not as regular as in case of single monopole antenna. However the
antenna still can be considered as an omnidirectional.
90
2 |E|/|EI|
120 60
1.5
150 1 30
0.5
ϕ
180 0
|E |, θ = 90°
θ
|Eθ|, θ = 75°
210|E |, θ = 60° 330
θ
|E |, θ = 45°
θ
|E |, θ = 90°
ϕ
|E |, θ = 75°
ϕ
|Eϕ |, θ = 60°
240 300
|Eϕ |, θ = 45°
270
Fig. 3.18 Radiation pattern of 1st radiator of antenna shown in the Fig. 3.15 at the surface
of constant value of theta at 5.8 GHz. The spherical system coordinates are presented next
to the figure.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 38
θ 0 θ 0
30 330 30 330
60 300 60 300
|E|/|EI| |E|/|EI|
2 2
1.5 1 1.5 1
0.5 0.5
90 270 90 270
θ 0 θ 0
30 330 30 330
60 300 60 300
|E|/|EI| |E|/|EI|
2 2
1.5 1 1.5 1
0.5 0.5
90 270 90 270
Fig. 3.19 Cross-sections of radiation pattern of 1st radiator of antenna shown in the Fig.
3.15 a) at the plane of phi=0°, b) at the plane of phi=45°, c) at the plane of phi=90°, d) at
the plane of phi=135°.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 39
4 3
1 2
Y
Z X
Z
X Y
Fig. 3.20 Structure of quadruple monopole antenna, top view and side view (in scale 1:1).
Parameter Value
laminate RO3003
substrate thickness 1.524 mm
substrate permittivity 3.023
substrate conductance 0.0014 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
metal conductance 5.847e7 S/m
antenna feed RG-405, semi-rigid
circular patch diameter 31.9 mm
slot size 1.0 mm
length of side of vias 40.0 mm × 40.0 mm
rectangle
vias radius 0.25 mm
substrate dimensions 85 mm × 85 mm
Tab. 3.2 Parameters of the structure shown in the Fig. 3.20.
The quadruple planar antenna with circular slot has been performed and measured. Fig.
3.21 presents the performed antenna.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 40
Fig. 3.21 Performed structure of quadruple planar antenna with circular slot.
Fig. 3.22 presents measured reflection coefficient for all of four radiators. The same effect
as for single planar antenna can be observed – resonant frequency is shifted from 5.8 GHz
to ca. 6.0 GHz.
-5
-10
|S11| measured
|S22| measured
] -15 |S33| measured
B |S44| measured
d[
|Sii| simulated
|Sii| demanded
-20
-25
-30
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 3.22 Measured reflection coefficient of the antenna shown in the Fig. 3.20 and Fig.
3.21.
Fig. 3.23 and Fig. 3.24 show mutual transmission between radiators. In all cases its value is
less than –16 dB in the considered frequency band.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 41
-5
-10
|S21| measured
|S32| measured
] -15 |S41| measured
B
d[ |S43| measured
|Sii| simulated
-20
-25
-30
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 3.23 Mutual transmission for the neighbouring patches of the antenna shown in the Fig.
3.20 and Fig. 3.21.
-5
-10
|S31| measured
] -15 |S42| measured
B
d[ |Sii| simulated
-20
-25
-30
4 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5 5.2 5.4 5.6 5.8 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8
frequency [GHz]
Fig. 3.24 Mutual transmission for the opposite patches of the antenna shown in the Fig. 3.20
and Fig. 3.21.
Fig. 3.25 shows measured and simulated XZ-plane cross-section of radiation pattern at 5.8
GHz. Results are roughly similar. Differences in the back radiation results from an antenna
under test mounting system, multiple narrow back lobes occurring in the measurement
results are caused by interferences with mounting tripod situated behind the antenna.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 42
0 0
30 330 30 330
60 300 60 300
1 0.8 1 0.8
0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4
|E|/|Emax| 0.2 |E|/|Emax| 0.2
90 270 90 270
30 330
60 300
120 240
|E | measured
θ
|E | measured
ϕ
|E | simulated
θ 150 210
|Eϕ | simulated
c) 180
Fig. 3.25 Measured and simulated cross-sections of radiation pattern of 1st radiator of
antenna shown in the Fig. 3.20 and Fig. 3.21 at 5.8 GHz. a) at the plane of phi=0°, b) at
the plane of phi=45°, d) at the plane of phi=135°.
Measurement results show that proposed structure can meet imposed requirements,
although design needs to be improved in order to avoid resonant frequency shift.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 43
structure has been feed by two 50 Ω microstrip lines made on FR4 dielectric layer and feed
pins that go through both dielectric substrates and ground plane. Fig. 3.26 shows antenna
geometry.
φ
X
Fig. 3.26 Two IFA antenna system geometry and coordinate system used in radiation
pattern plots.
Structure has been optimised in order to have 5.8 GHz centre frequency and later to
achieve wide bandwidth. Area below antenna is not grounded. FR4 substrate and ground
plane are 10 mm shorter than RO3203 substrate. Each antenna utilizes two pins. One of
them is used to feed the antenna (inner one in Fig. 3.27) and another to ground the
antenna to the ground plane. In Fig. Fig. 3.27 structure dimensions are presented. In Tab.
3.3 detailed parameters of used substrate can be found.
80
62.6
0.3
17.4
10
6.7 6.7
100 100
1.5
Parameter Value
laminate RO3203
substrate thickness 0.3 mm
substrate permittivity 3.00
substrate conductance 0.0016 S/m
metal thickness 35 µm
Tab. 3.3 Parameters of used substrate.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 44
Fig. 3.28 shows simulated antenna system S-parameters. Using S-parameters results
envelope correlation has been computed using equation (3-1) [7]. Envelope correlation plot
is shown in Fig. 3.29.
2
S11* S 21 + S12* S 22
ρe = (3-1)
( 2
1 − S11 − S 21
2
)(
1 − S 22 − S12
2 2
)
Fig. 3.28 S-parameters of the designed two IFA antenna systems. With grey background
demanded bandwidth is marked.
Fig. 3.29 Envelope correlation of the designed antenna system. With grey background
demanded bandwidth is marked.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 45
Parameter Value
Type of cable RG-405
Impedance 50 ohm
Conductor diameter 0.020 in.
Insulation diameter 0.062 in.
Overall nominal
0.085 in.
diameter
Monopole antenna is designed to be fed directly from SMA junction, however that kind of
antenna has not been performed during investigation.
Bow-tie antenna is fed by unsymmetrical microstrip transmission line with impedance equal
to 50 ohm. Line parameters are given in the Tab. 4.2.
Parameter Value
Type of laminate RO3203
Substrate thickness 0.254 mm
Substrate relative 3.00
permittivity
Line width 0.6 mm
Tab. 4.2 Parameters of microstrip transmission line.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 46
Fig. 5.1 Elimination of some multipath components using narrow beam antenna in the
receiver
This analysis bases on results of D13 and presents influence of beam width of antenna
radiation patterns on error of calculated distance between antennas. Special software (DEES
– Distance Error Estimator) has been implemented in Matlab to calculate distance between
antennas using the channel impulse responses (CIR) obtained from simulations or
measurements. Different detection methods of TOA of LOS component have been
considered during the analysis (Fig. 5.2):
• detection of maximum of the entire signal – TOA-MD, component of the channel impulse
response with largest amplitude is considered as LOS signal, when there are multipath
components with amplitude larger than amplitude of LOS one , errors occurs
• detection of first peak of the signal – TOA-FP, first pick above the assumed threshold in
the channel impulse response is detected as LOS
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 47
• leading edge detection – TOA-LE, first signal above assumed threshold is detected and
TOA of LOS signal is calculated considering time correction (adequate for direct clear
LOS signal delay with the same threshold)
a) b)
|h(τ)| ld |h(τ)|
TOA-FP levell
0.1 (np.:10%)
τFP τMD τ τ
1/B
τ1 τLE
Fig. 5.2 TOA detection techniques (a): TOA-MD (τMD), TOA-FP(τFP), TOA-LE (τLE). Description
of techniques is in text. On (b) method of ld value calculation for TOA-LE method with LEP
threshold level for signal of bandwidth B.
TOA-LE detection method is resistant to existence of strong multipath signals with small
delays, but it needs to calculate proper approximation of correction time parameter ld that
depends on signal shape (modulation, Tx and Rx filters bandwidths, which are responsible
for side lobes levels, and main lobe width). Such detection method is implemented in
designed HPLS.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 48
τ
τ τ τ
R-T simulation CIR files 2xRRC CIR after DME
data
filtration filtration estimation
Fig. 5.3 CIR generation and filtering process using DEES program
In the first step average channel impulse responses for considered propagation environment
and for different types of the receiver antennas has been calculated, basing on results form
RPS. In calculations for each point of the receiver it was assumed that the antenna was
always pointed towards the transmitter (model of scanning antenna array). In the
transmitter that was placed near a wall, sector antenna, allowing to coverage all the room,
was used. Results are presented in Fig. 5.4 and Fig. 5.5. It is seen that when antenna with
narrower beam is used, multipath components with small delays (having largest impact on
accuracy of distance determination) are attenuated. The use of antenna with beam width in
a range 60-90o can already significantly decrease amplitude of small delay components in
the channel impulse response.
a) b)
|h(τ )|
|h(τ )|
Fig. 5.4 Average channel impulse responses for LOS cases: a) Tx in the corner, b) Tx in
quarter length of shorter wall.
a) b)
|h(τ )|
|h(τ )|
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 49
Fig. 5.5 Average channel impulse responses for: a) LOS case only, TX in half length of
shorter wall, b) NLOS case only, Tx in half length of shorter wall
Analysis of dependence of distance error DME on different detection methods, different the
system bandwidths and different antenna beam widths and polarisation has been done. Two
configurations of the propagation environment have been considered:
• empty room
• room with cubic objects, placed uniformly inside the room
Visualization of DME as function of the system bandwidth and polarisation for empty room
are presented in Fig. 5.6 and Fig. 5.7. It was assumed that omnidirectional antennas were
used for the transmitter and the receiver. Better results are obtained when circular
polarisation is used. In this case single reflected multipath waves are additionally attenuated
in the receiving antenna (after changing direction of polarization rotation).
When there are objects inside the room for some locations of Rx antenna direct visibility
between Tx and Rx antennas are obstructed, what corresponds to additional attenuation of
LOS signal and increasing of DME (Fig. 5.8). But error is smaller when TOA-LE detection
method is implemented.
a) B=100 MHz
b) B= 10 MHz
Fig. 5.6 2D visualisation of distance measurement error DME for empty room situation (Tx
placed in the corner, both antennas with linear polarisation): a) system bandwidth - 100
MHz; b) system bandwidth – 10 MHz
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 50
a) B=100 MHz
b) B= 10 MHz
Fig. 5.7 2D visualisation of distance measurement error DME for empty room situation (Tx
placed in the corner, both antennas with circular polarisation): a) system bandwidth - 100
MHz; b) system bandwidth – 10 MHz
a) TOA-MD
b) TOA-LE
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 51
Fig. 5.8 2D visualisation of distance measurement error DME for room with objects inside
(Tx placed in the corner, both antennas with linear polarisation, 100 MHz system
bandwidth): a) TOA-MD detection; b) TOA-LE detection
Fig. 5.9 and Fig. 5.10 present dependence of distance error DME, calculated in DEES
software, on the receiver antenna beam width for 100 MHz and 10 MHz system bandwidths
respectively. Four values of the antenna beam width: omni (360o), 60o, 38o, 19 o Different
detection methods are considered. The largest errors are for maximum pick TOA-MD
detection and the smallest for leading edge TOA-LE that is used in RESOLUTION. The use of
antenna with narrower main beam allows to decrease DME, but changes are smaller when
TOA-LE detection is implemented and the system bandwidth is larger. Over 50 % accuracy
improvement in distance measurement can be achieved, for 100 MHz bandwidth, using 20o
beam width antenna instead the omnidirectional one, when leading edge TOA-LE is
implemented.
Fig. 5.9 Mean value and standard deviation of distance measurement error DME as function
of the mobile Rx antenna beam width for different detection methods and 100 MHz
bandwidth
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 52
Fig. 5.10 Mean value and standard deviation of distance measurement error DME as
function of the mobile Rx antenna beam width for different detection methods and 10 MHz
bandwidth
It follows from simulation, that much smaller DME error can be obtained for the mobile
terminal antenna with 60° beam width. In each analysed case (different Tx locations)
narrowing antenna beam width causing decreasing of DME error. Additionally using TOA-LE
and TOA-FP methods results are few times better than for traditional TOA-MD method. In
RESOLUTION project edge detection (TOA-LE) is used for the distance calculation. This
method is resistant for multipath components, but needs to have proper ld parameter (Fig.
4.3) calculation. Additionally signal shaping filters should have low level side lobes, which
can cause deterioration of precision, and cause even measurement distance values smaller
than real distance.
Results concerning discussed techniques are also partially presented in [8], [9], [10], [11]
by participants of this part of the project.
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 53
6 Conclusion
Different types of antennas and antenna arrays for High-Precision-Localization-System have
been designed, realized and measured. Proposed antenna arrays meet the system
requirements and seem to be suitable for practical application.
Considering the use of one wideband antenna for localization and communication in 5.5 GHz
systems E-shaped patch antenna could be used as single antenna or element of antenna
array in the base station BS and in mobile terminal STA mounted on vehicle (AGV
applications). In handheld mobile terminal in this case inverted F antenna could be used.
When communications and localization parts of the system are separated (i.e.
communication is realized using WLAN working in 2.4 GHz band) narrowband antennas can
be used in localization system. In this case standard patch antennas are preferable. The use
of circular polarization can be considered in this case. The use of the transmitting and
receiving antennas with circular polarization can attenuate some multipath components with
odd number of reflections and small delays (i.e. single reflections from ceiling, floor, walls,
objects in a room), and can increase accuracy of localization system. Additionally circularly
polarized antenna in the BS can decrease polarization mismatch in handheld terminals with
linearly polarized antennas.
To achieve possibility of mobile terminal of receiving signals form all directions the use of
omnidirectional antenna has been proposed. Quarter wavelength monopole antenna could
be used in this case for wideband transmission, or in narrowband case planar
complementary solution – circular slot antenna (that has the same characteristics as
monopole antenna, but it is narrowband solution) could be used. The use of such antenna in
the mobile terminal has additional advantage – attenuation of waves reflected from floor,
due to tilt of radiation pattern in elevation plane.
Antenna arrays can be used in the system to improve its characteristics. Array with
electronically steered narrow beam can increase power of the received signal (increasing
coverage range of the system) and attenuate some strong multipath components with small
delays, causing errors of position determination in localization system. The use of antenna
arrays depends on HPLS configuration. If localization is realized using active reflector in the
mobile terminal STA, antenna arrays could be used in the BS (to received signal
retransmitted by STA) and in STA (to receive signal from chosen BS and retransmit it in the
same direction). In case of STA a simple switching array seems to be a good solution. If
localization is realized basing on GPS concept with unidirectional down-link transmission
from the BS to the mobile terminal STA, sector antennas could be used in the BS and
antenna arrays could be used in the STA to receive signal from each BS. To obtain
possibility of receiving signals from all directions four-element array with planar circular slot
antennas has been proposed.
Following antennas and antenna arrays have been designed, realized and investigated:
• for the BS
1. E-shaped wideband patch antenna
2. circular patch antenna with circular polarization
3. quarter-circular array of 4 elements
4. semicircular array of 8 elements
5. linear array of 4 elements (for testing purposes)
• for the mobile terminal
1. quarter wavelength monopole antenna (only designed)
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31
D12 – Design of antennas and antenna arrays 54
7 References
[1] RESOLUTION, Half-Year Report, Q2
[2 RESOLUTION, D3 Deliverable - Characterization and modelling of radio channel
[5] http://www.feko.info/
RESOLUTION 2007-12-31