Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Before the Court is the United States’ Motion For Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Doc.
423) which came before the Court during the defendant’s sentencing hearing on January 12,
2011. The Court finds, as a result of the guilty verdicts entered in this case for which the United
States sought forfeiture, and the evidence already in the record, that the United States has
established the requisite nexus between the property sought to be forfeited and the corresponding
offenses. Accordingly, the Court finds that the United States has established that proceeds were
obtained from the offenses for which the defendant has been convicted and further finds that a
forfeiture money judgment shall be imposed against the defendant in the amount of $616,055.73.
Additionally, the Court finds that the United States has established that certain real property was
involved in the money laundering offenses for which the defendant has been convicted. The real
property is identified as that parcel of property located at 1904 Massachusetts, Lawrence, Kansas,
legally described in Douglas County, Plate/Record Id. U02708 as located at “Haskell Place,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant shall forfeit her interest in the real
Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM -JPO Document 461 Filed 04/18/11 Page 2 of 3
property identified as that parcel of property located at 1904 Massachusetts, Lawrence, Kansas,
legally described in Douglas County, Plate/Record Id. U02708 as located at “Haskell Place,
Upon entry of this Order, the United States is authorized to seize the real property
identified above, whether held by the defendant or a third party, and to conduct discovery to
identify, locate or dispose of the property pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
32.2(b)(3).
Upon entry of this Order, the United States shall give notice of this order by publication
provide written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the property.
Any person, other than defendant, asserting a legal interest in any of the forfeitable
property, may within thirty days of notice to that person, petition the Court for a hearing without
a jury to adjudicate the validity of that person’s alleged interest and for an amendment of the
Any petition filed by a third-party asserting an interest in any of the property shall set
forth the nature and extent of petitioner’s alleged right, title and interest in the property, any
additional facts supporting the petitioner’s claim, and the relief sought.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Carlos Murguia
2
Case 2:07-cr-20124-CM -JPO Document 461 Filed 04/18/11 Page 3 of 3
CARLOS MURGUIA
United States District Judge