Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Cindy McNeese
CONTACT INFORMATION
Imagine for a moment that the closing date of hard-to-come-by finance talent also gets put behind
of a major acquisition is approaching, and as immediate operational challenges.
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) you are, of course, With longer-term priorities on the back burner, trouble
responsible for much of the process. Your finance isn’t far behind (see Exhibit 1). One of several things
team needs to complete the merger, stabilize the typically goes wrong:
transactional processes of the two organizations, n Merger integration plans that sounded great pre-close
and sort out all the financial-control issues that do not fit within the budget. One-time costs are much
will have to be dealt with beginning on day one of higher than originally estimated and the slippage
the newly merged company. cannot be reconciled.
Yet, focusing only on the immediate tasks at hand n Inadequate forecasting causes the business to hit
comes at a cost. Your finance group’s resources are a major blind spot and the combined entity suffers.
stretched thin, and some tough, forward-looking issues n A competitor moves quickly to take advantage of
are left behind. For example, incorporating the post- your inability to respond as a cohesive well-controlled
merger integration plan into your budget and building organization—and succeeds.
next year’s plan will have to wait. Determining how to n Woefully overloaded, the best finance talent from the
integrate forecasts to maintain an early warning system target company gets burned out by the integration
to protect against surprises will come later. Thinking and decides to quit.
about how to use the integration to increase the level None of this has to happen.
Exhibit 1
Merger Challenges Crop Up Quickly
7HAT 4ENDS TO (APPEN 7HAT TO $O !BOUT )T
■ &INANCE RESOURCES RAPIDLY BECOME CONSTRAINED ACROSS THE COMPANY ■ 3HORE UP INTEGRATION
RELATED CAPABILITIES AHEAD OF TIME
■ )NTERNAL INTEGRATION RESOURCES MIGRATE TOWARD IMMEDIATE PRIORITIES ■ 3TART FULL INTEGRATION PLANNING IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEAL IS ANNOUNCED
n 4RANSACTION PROCESSES AND DRIVE FOR EARLY STAKE
IN
THE
GROUND SOLUTIONS
n #ONTROLS ■ "E EXPLICIT ABOUT WHICH &INANCE RESOURCES WILL GO WHERE
n /RGANIZATIONhLINES AND BOXESv
n 2UNNING THE BUSINESS
■ h4HE RESTv DOESNT HAPPEN n -ANAGING NEAR
TERM ISSUES
n $ESIGNING NEW FORECASTING PLANNING BUDGETING PROCESSES n ,OOKING AHEAD
n )NTEGRATING SYNERGIES WITH BUDGETS n 3UPPORTING OTHER INTEGRATION AREAS
■ !S A RESULT OVERALL PERFORMANCE TENDS TO LAG ■ %NSURE THAT ALL INTEGRATION TEAMS ARE DEVELOPING PLANS THAT WILL
n 3YNERGIES SLIP THROUGH THE CRACKS MESH WITH BUDGETS AND FORECASTS
n .EW ORGANIZATION GETS BOGGED DOWN AND BECOMES LESS ADAPTIVE
TO CHANGE
Exhibit 3
Building an Internal Integration Engine
■ 3TANDARDIZE BUSINESS DATA ARCHITECTURE
4AILOR 9OUR "USINESS ■ $EVELOP SHARED SERVICES CAPABILITIES THAT WILL hPLUG AND PLAYv
&OR 3CALABILITY ■ 2EDUCE UNNECESSARY COMPLEXITY IN BUSINESS PROCESSES
■ 3TANDARDIZE DEAL TEAM STRUCTURES WITH COMMON ROLES AND TASKS FOR EACH DEAL
&ORMALIZE THE ■ #REATE STANDARDIZED TOOLS TO EVALUATE OPPORTUNITIES DEVELOP INTEGRATION PLANS AND TRACK SYNERGIES
0ROCESS ■ "UILD STANDARD CHECKLISTS FOR OPPORTUNITY ASSESSMENT DUE DILIGENCE DATA REQUESTS DAY READINESS AND FUNCTIONAL
INTEGRATION
■ 3ET SYNERGY AND PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS UP FRONT ENSURING OWNERSHIP FROM KEY MANAGERS
%NSURE
!CCOUNTABILITY
■ ,INK UPFRONT COMMITMENTS WITH SYNERGY TARGETS STRATEGIC PLANS BUDGETS AND INCENTIVES
■ &ORMALLY LINK PREMIUM PAID TO SYNERGIES EXPECTED
absorption or capturing the best of both companies), finance must play and the ability to deploy resources to
priorities for systems integration, and the degree of them appropriately.
integration for key business processes. Attention
Although not an exhaustive checklist, here are the
must be paid to details, and the speed and stability of
central areas of responsibility for CFOs as a transaction
finance integration can set the pace and tone for the
moves through deal close and post-merger integration:
entire company.
n Executing the transaction. Finance has primary
Last, the regulatory environment has become far more
responsibilities for deal-related accounting (e.g.,
challenging with the adoption of Sarbanes-Oxley, and
purchase accounting), the structuring and execution
compliance issues can become more complex—and
of merger-related agreements, cash and financing
sometimes need to be entirely reworked—in a merger.
requirements, and details necessary for operation of
Target companies come with their own set of controls,
the new entity on day 1, such as insurance and bank-
policies, and procedures that need to be harmonized
account transfers.
with the acquirer. If the target company is privately held
or ill-prepared for Sarbanes-Oxley, implementing and n Creating a strong, stable control environment. Finance
documenting the right set of controls could increase the must drive the rapid harmonization of accounting
time and effort required to close the transaction. Due policies to prevent the first reporting period following
diligence must include a deeper look into controls and the merger from becoming a nightmare. Again, detail
compliance. In addition, Sarbanes-Oxley has pushed is critical and the challenges are many. They include
Boards to demand more information on acquisitions, ensuring adequate controls for not only the merged
which often leads to more structured reviews and more entity but also for transitional processes (e.g., limits
Board involvement in approving even relatively small of authority, capital-expenditure approval processes),
mergers. Exhibit 4 presents the merger dos and don’ts training the organization on new policies, and ensur-
for CFOs. ing Sarbanes-Oxley 404 compliance from deal close
onward.
Once the organization is well into the merger process,
the CFO and his or her organization are forced to n Integrating the two organizations. Finance must
operate in a challenging environment. But having taken ensure that the right management information exists
the right steps beforehand, the CFO is ready to meet in a way that allows managers to effectively run and
these new challenges in a disciplined way. Success report on the new entity—and it needs to be in place
requires a deep understanding of the specific roles that on the first day. For example, will customer
Exhibit 4
Merger Dos and Don’ts for CFOs
$O $ONT
■ %NSURE A STRONG PROCESS IS IN PLACE TO MEASURE AND CAPTURE THE ■ &OCUS SOLELY ON DEAL CLOSE AND DAY ISSUES WITHIN FINANCE
SYNERGIES FROM ANY DEALBIG OR SMALL ■ 7AIT FOR OTHER AREAS TO DETERMINE WHEN AND HOW SYSTEMS AND
■ )NSIST ON TOP
LEVEL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SYNERGIES FROM THE ORGANIZATION PROCESSES WILL COME TOGETHER BEFORE PLANNING
BEFORE SIGNING THE AGREEMENT ■ 7AIT TO CLOSE THE DEAL BEFORE BEGINNING INTEGRATION PLANNINGCHANGE
■ 3ET EXPECTATIONS FOR THE BUSINESS TO BUILD INTEGRATION PLANS THAT WILL IS EASIEST IN THE EARLY DAYS FOLLOWING THE MERGER
LINK TO BUDGETS AND FORECASTS ■ ,ET THE ORGANIZATION OVERSIMPLIFY THE COMPLEXITY OF INTEGRATION DURING
■ )NVEST SUFFICIENT FINANCE RESOURCES IN THE INTEGRATION COMMENSURATE THE PLANNING ONLY TO GET TRAPPED IN THE DETAILS AFTER THE DEAL IS CLOSED
WITH THE IMPORTANCE AND MAGNITUDE OF THE EXPECTED SYNERGIES ■ )GNORE THE PEOPLE ASPECTS OF THE DEALUSE THE MERGER AS AN
■ (AVE FINANCE PLAY A LEAD ROLE IN BUILDING THE TRANSITION PLAN FOR SYSTEMS OPPORTUNITY TO WOO HIGH QUALITY EXPERIENCED TALENT
AND PROCESSES
■ -AINTAIN THE RIGHT TONE AT THE TOP DURING PLANNING INTEGRATION
LEAD BY EXAMPLE IN THE FINANCE ORGANIZATION FOCUS COMMUNICATIONS
ON THE DEAL
profitability data be available in a manner that allows the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and requires that
managers to compare performance from both pre- commitments to achieving synergy targets be clear
merger entities on an apples-to-apples basis? This and that relevant parties be fully accountable. CFOs
integration imperative is also applicable within the have often been foiled by losing track of merger-
finance group—processes like vendor payments, related costs and synergies and not harmonizing
placing orders, credit analysis, and accounts integration planning with financial forecasts. It is
receivable need to be running seamlessly at close critical not to under-deliver to Wall Street right out of
and throughout the organization. the box.
n Designing the post-merger management architecture. Without a doubt, a merger can be a hair-raising
It is important for finance to understand how experience for the unprepared CFO—pushing his or
key management processes will be run in the post- her finance organization beyond the breaking point.
merger environment. Many a merger has been stifled However, CFOs who get their groups in shape before
when two management teams sit across the table the merger and who anticipate the challenges ahead
from each other after the close but do not understand can find themselves in a position to drive their
how their reports, plans, and processes fit together. transactions to completion with minimal disruption and
Rethinking these processes involves considerations fewer surprises.
such as information management and the method
We have worked with CFOs and companies that have
by which strategic and operational plans will be
done it right, and their experience provides a positive
integrated.
counter to the generally dismal results mergers
n Providing financial support to the integration teams. produce. Finance, as we have said, has a critical and
Other post-merger integration teams will need central role to play, not only in selecting the merger
objective resources to make fact-based, objective partner but also in ensuring that the expected value
management decisions as they move through the of the transaction to the organization is realized. It
process. They will need help in planning and is not easy, but it is possible—a fact that should be
quantifying synergies so they can be incorporated heartening for CFOs interested in looking to business
in future budgets and, later, concrete commitments. combinations as one way to help achieve their
company’s long-term goals.
n Providing guidance to investors on when to expect
synergies. This is a CFO role, often in partnership with
BOOZ & COMPANY WORLDWIDE OFFICES
Asia Europe Middle East South America
Beijing Amsterdam Abu Dhabi Buenos Aires
Hong Kong Berlin Beirut Rio de Janeiro
Mumbai Copenhagen Cairo Santiago
Seoul Dublin Dubai São Paulo
Shanghai Düsseldorf Riyadh
Taipei Frankfurt
Tokyo Helsinki North America
London Atlanta
Australia, Madrid Chicago
New Zealand, Milan Cleveland
and Moscow Dallas
Southeast Asia Munich Detroit
Oslo Florham Park
Adelaide Paris Houston
Auckland Rome Los Angeles
Bangkok Stockholm McLean
Brisbane Stuttgart Mexico City
Canberra Vienna New York City
Jakarta Warsaw Parsippany
Kuala Lumpur Zurich San Francisco
Melbourne
Sydney
The most recent list of our office addresses and telephone numbers 11CP/0105 Printed in USA
can be found on our Web site, www.booz.com. ©2005 Booz & Company Inc.