DATA ANALYSIS DATA ANALYSIS OF EXISTING This analysis covert the road economic characteristics of the study area,

using the statistics of question analysis, visual observation note taking etc.

SAMPLING ANALYSIS Random sampling of 20% sample size was used for from a total of 20 students and the questionnaire was divided into Road Condition.

Socio-economic characteristics and housing condition. With size = 20% 20 100 x 20 1 = 4%

SEX ANALYSIS By this research work, it was observed that the study has a population total of 1039 people. Sex Male No. 539 % 51.9

Female 498 Total 1037 Source: Field work, 2011.

48.0 100

Table 1 showing the total population and sex. Source; field work, 2011. 100

50 48.0 0Figure 2 showing sex of the population Building classification Analysis Class No % 0o Fish class 80 40% 144:2 Second class 80 40 143.2 Third Class 41 20.3 36.337 Total 201 100 360 Figures 3 showing building classification of the area.
5.19

143.2 143.3

1453.2 36.337

Data Analysis of Existing Condition This corrors the road condition, the physical and socioeconomic characteristic of the study area using the

questionnaire scale role and thread and visual observation as a technique for data collection, 45 questionnaires was sample using random sampling 22 on the housing and 23 on the socio-economic. AGE DISTRIBUTION TABLE Age bracket male % 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60.64 65-69 50above Total 20 22 28 35 54 74 70 80 52 34 28 22 12 3 534 3.7 4.1 5.2 6.5 10.1 13.1 13.1 14.9 9.7 6.3 5.2 4.1 2.2 0.5 100 Female 22 20 25 30 50 68 68 79 50 30 26 20 10 3 503 % Total 45 42 53 65 104 144 138 159 102 64 54 42 22 6 1037 % 4.0 4.0 5.1 6.2 10.0 13.8 13..30 15.3 9.8 6.17 5.2 4.0 2.1 0.5 100

4.2 3.9 49 5.9 9.9 13.9 13.5 15.7 9.9 5.9 5.1 3.9 1.9 0.5 100

Figure 4. showing age structure distribution source: field work 2011.

AGE PYRAMID 70 1

65 69 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4

Figure 5 showing population pyramid Source: field work 2011.

Land use Analysis Land use Residential Commercial Institution Circulation Open Space Total Area in Hectors 50 5 8 15 22 100 Percentage 50 5 8 15 22 100

Figure 6 showing land use Analysis Source: field work 2011. House Characteristic Analysis Nature of House Analysis Nature Purminanad Temporal Total Number 177 24 201 % 88.0 11.9 100 0o 316.83 42.96 360

Figure 7 showing nature of House Source: field work 2011.

100-

5072.1

0-

27.8

Showing building structure type in % Roof Material Analysis Type Iron sheet Abbestor Total Number 161 40 201 % 80 20 100 0o 288.19o 71.6o 360o

Figure 10 showing roof materials Source: field work 2011.

71.6o

288.19o showing the roof materials in degrees. Walls Type Sample Land mark Total Number 193 8 201 % 345.47 3.9 100 00 14.32 360

Figure 11 showing wall analyses Source field work 2011. 200

100

171.90 7.1 0

0Showing wall analysis in degrees Foundation Analysis Type Cartoon Mud Total No 185 16 201 % 92 7.9 100 O0 331.15 28.64 360

Figure 12 showing foundation Analysis

Source: Field work 2001.

731.150 28.640

Showing foundation analysis in degrees.

Public utilities Water supply Type Pipe-borne Well Total Number 129 72 210 % 64 35.8 100 00 230.91 128.88 360

Figure 13 showing the water supply analysis Source: field work 2011.

100

50 64 035.8

Showing water supply in % Electricity supply

Availability Availability None Total

No 200 1 210

% 995 0.49 100

00 3580 1.79 360