Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Tom Augspurger and Sara Ward U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service P.O. Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 tom_augspurger@fws.gov Phone: 919/856-4520 x.21 sara_ward@fws.gov 919/856-4520 x.30
http://nc-es.fws.gov/ecotox
1
Objectives
1. Describe a framework for evaluating sediments at dam removal sites 2. Compile existing information to gauge the extent of any sediment quality concerns 3. Identify triggers for determining whether additional effort is needed 4. Become familiar with helpful resources
3
http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/pubs/sedtox/ VolumeI.pdf
General Framework
Start with tier 1 assessment (use existing info to assess the potential for a contaminated sediment concern) Proceed in a step-wise fashion only to the extent necessary to address the site
tier 2 (surface water and sediment chemistry), tier 3 (toxicity and bioaccumulation testing) tier 4 (case-specific lab and field testing)
Tier 1
Start with existing info to assess the potential a) lack of pollutant sources = low need for aggressive site characterization b) likewise, any sampling should be guided by specific issues from this review
10
1. Introduction
Purpose of review (tech assistance / regulatory) Overview of dam / reservoir of interest:
Age of structure Height of structure Upstream dams Landuses Sensitive resources / known issues of concern
11
2. Sources of Contamination
Potential sources of contamination include: urban and agricultural runoff industrial and municipal wastewater discharges riparian fill spills of oil or chemicals releases from landfills or hazardous waste sites mineral extraction / refinement practices, etc. Existing and historic
12
1995
1998
2001
2004
14
15
16
5. Contaminants of concern
From lists of sources like thiscan get listings of pollutants by source type:
Road run-off = PAHs, metals Textile manufacturers = metals Paper mills = metals, dioxins Metal finishing = metals, PCBs
USEPA .1997. Incidence and Severity of Sediment Contamination in Surface Waters of the United States: Volume 3: National Sediment Contaminant Point Source Inventory. EPA-823R97008 EPA17
5. Contaminants of concern
If you have data, can evaluate against: Water quality standards Federal water quality criteria Sediment quality guidelines and standards (none in NC, but other models to consider)
18
Sources:
Ingersoll CG, Dillon T, Biddinger RG, editors. 1997. Ecological Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sediment. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL. MacDonald DD, Ingersoll CG, Berger TA. 2000. Development and evaluation of consensusbased sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39: 20-31. USEPA. 2000. Prediction of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines. EPA 905/R-00/007, Chicago, IL. 19
21
6. Summary / Recommendations
What was done How it was done What was learned Where to go from herewill almost always include some level of sampling (tier 2), so include a draft sampling design Circulate draft and final through stakeholders
22
Tier 2 - Testing
Sampling plan needs to include:
What, How many, Where, How, and When PLUS: Use of competent field crew and certified lab (Who) QA/QC Plan (How well) Proposed screening values as triggers for tier 3 versus done (Why)
23
PEC
Possibly Toxic
TEC
Presumed Nontoxic
24
http://www.fws.gov/raleigh/pdfs/DillsboroReportFinal.pdf
25
26
27
Work to the extent necessary to address the site With stakeholder input on triggers
28
Questions?
http://nc-es.fws.gov/ecotox
29