Ipolitics Afghan Detainees Documents

362 DOCUMENTS RELEASED BY
THE PANEL OF ARBITERS

362 DOCUMENTS COMMUNIQUS PAR
LE GROUPE DEXPERTS ARBITRES

TABLE OF CONTENTS
362 DOCUMENTS PRIORITIZED BY THE AD HOC COMMITTEE
LEGEND
The following is a guide to reading the determinations made by the Panel of Arbiters with respect to the 362 documents, or portions
thereof, prioritized by the Ad Hoc Committee.
The Table of Contents below indicates the specific document number, as well as whether the entire document was referred or only a
specific page, or paragraph within the document. The Panel of Arbiters did not make any determinations with respect to any of the
portions of the documents that are not specifically referred to below, as these were not referred to the Panel of Arbiters by the Ad Hoc
Committee. The redactions remain over these portions of the documents.
The Table of Contents below also indicates which determinations were made by the Panel of Arbiters with regard to the specifically
referred portions of the documents.
For each specific referred portion, a determination was made whether to (a) lift the redaction; (b) include a word substitution; (c)
include a summary; or (d) retain the redaction.
In the documents that follow this Table of Contents, the Panel of Arbiters determinations are represented as follows:
1. Box with Dotted Lines = = Change Implemented by the Panel of Arbiters.
3. Text Within Dotted Lines Without Other Typographical Notations = Lift of the Redaction (Original Text Restored).
2. Text Within Parentheses = ( ) = Word Substitution.
3. Text Within Square Brackets = [ ] = Summary.
4. Solid Black Box = = Redaction Retained.
-2-

Document
Number
Referred Sections Decision of Panel of Arbiters
1.
7 page 1; page 4, paragraph 12; page 6,
paragraphs 17-19
lifts, word substitutions, summaries
2.
10 page 6, paragraph M; page 7 all redactions retained
3.
14 pages 17; 20 lifts, word substitutions, summaries
4.
15 entire document lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
5.
18 pages 1; 6 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
6.
55 page 1 no redactions retained
7.
57 page 4, last paragraph; page 5, first two
paragraphs
lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
8.
61 page 2 summaries, balance of redactions retained
9.
redactions retained
10.
78 entire document summaries
11.
90 pages 1-2 no redactions retained
12.
96 entire document lifts, word substitutions, summaries
13.
102 pages 1-2 summaries, balance of redactions retained
-3-

Document
Number
14.
108 page 1, paragraphs 3-4; page 2, paragraphs
2-3
redactions retained
15.
113 page 1, paragraph 3; pages 7-8 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
16.
114 page 1 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
17.
115 entire document lifts, summaries
18.
redactions retained
19.
redactions retained
20.
21.
138 entire document lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
22.
143 entire document lifts, balance of redactions retained
23.
144 entire document summaries, balance of redactions retained
24.
145 entire document lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
25.
redactions retained
26.
27.
-4-

Document
Number
redactions retained
28.
redactions retained
29.
30.
31.
174 pages 2-4 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
32.
33.
redactions retained
34.
192 pages 2-3 lifts, summaries
35.
193 page 2 lifts, word substitutions
36.
196 pages 1; 4 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
37.
38.
222 pages 2-3 lifts, summaries
39.
40.
242 entire document word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
-5-

Document
Number
41.
42.
redactions retained
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
redactions retained
51.
280 pages 5; 15; 17; page 25, line 3; page 36,
lines 22-25; page 37, line 1; page 38, lines
21-22; page 39, lines 24-25; pages 49-51;
54-57; 61-62; 75; 81-84; 90; 95; 105-106;
109; 114-115; 122; 124; 135; 138; 143-145;
149; 154-155; 157; 159; 162-163
lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
52.
282 page 7; 9; 31-32 lifts, balance of redactions retained
-6-

Document
Number
53.
288 page 1, paragraph 4; pages 2-7; 11-16 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
54.
300 all dates and numbers; portions of page 8;
pages 11-12; portions of page 14; portions
of page 18; portions of pages 20-21;
portions of page 23; page 27; portions of
page 28; portions of page 30; pages 32-33;
portions of page 39; pages 46; 91; 182;
portions of page 256; pages 257; 263; 279
55.
304 portions of page 16; portions of page 24;
portions of pages 38 and 39
redactions retained
56.
308 all dates; page 17; page 27, paragraph 2 and
3(b); page 28, portions of paragraph 6; page
31, portions of paragraph 15; page 32,
paragraphs 16 and 17; page 33; page 67,
portions of last paragraph
redactions retained
57.
310 portions of page 1, paragraph 2 lifts
58.
314 page 7, paragraph c; pages 19-20 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
59.
321 pages 13; 17 summaries, balance of redactions retained
60.
322 portions of pages 4 and 5; page 6; page 8,
portions of paragraph 4; page 9, portions of
paragraph 5; portions of pages 10-12;
portions of pages 26 and 27; page 32,
summaries
-7-

Document
Number
portions of last paragraph; portions of page
36; page 39, portions of top paragraph; page
40, portions of first paragraph; portions of
page 41; portions of page 47; portions of
page 53
61.
342 page 10 lifts, balance of redactions retained
62.
353 page 14, paragraph 14; page 18; paragraph
c; portions of page 19
63.
383 pages 5, paragraph 10 word substitutions
64.
385 page 1-2 lifts
65.
391 page 40, paragraphs H, I and J; portions of
page 48; page 49, paragraph D; page 50,
paragraph F; page 51, paragraph G; page
52, paragraph N; page 53, paragraphs A, C,
E; portions of page 54; page 55, paragraph
B; page 59, paragraph E; pages 62-63
redactions retained
66.
392 pages 10; 13-14; page 21, lines 5-13;
portions of page 26; pages 41-47; pages 50;
52-54; portions of pages 56; page 58, line
25; page 59; pages 63-67; pages 69; 71;
page 72, line 25; pages 75-79; 85; 87-88;
90; 92; 94-95; 101; 106-107; 109-110; 113-
119; 134
redactions retained
67.
395 page 16, lines 16-20; page 20, line 23; page lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
-8-

Document
Number
21, paragraph 20; page 54; portions of page
59; pages 63; 67; page 83, line 20; pages
100-103
68.
396 pages 39-42; 50-51; 53; 61; 63-64; page 65,
lines 1-5 and 11-25; pages 66-67; 75; 79-82;
84-87; 89-92
word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
retained
69.
397 portions of page 9; pages 10; 14-15; 24-28;
30-33; 51; 58-65; 68; 70-71; 73-74; 76-77;
79-80; 84
70.
398 pages 7; 13; 18; 24-25; 27-28; 35-38; 45-46;
50-52; 57; 59; page 60, lines 7-10; pages
63-69; page 70, lines 3-8; pages 72; 75-76;
86-87; 92; 94; 97-101; 104
redactions retained
71.
409 pages 25; 28; 99-101 lifts, balance of redactions retained
72.
redactions retained
73.
redactions retained
74.
75.
redactions retained
76.
429 page 2, paragraphs 8-9; page 4, paragraph summaries
-9-

Document
Number
20
77.
430 summary paragraph; paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6,
10 and 11
retained
78.
431 page 2, paragraphs 7 and 9 word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
retained
79.
433 page 1, paragraphs 1, 6-7; page 2, paragraph
10
summaries
80.
434 page 3, paragraph 4 summaries
81.
437 pages 2-3, paragraphs 11, 13-14 word substitutions, summaries
82.
83.
redactions retained
84.
redactions retained
85.
445 page 2, paragraphs 11-12; pages 3-4 word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
retained
86.
87.
447 entire document word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
retained
-10-

Document
Number
88.
448 page 1, summary paragraph, paragraph 6;
page 2, paragraphs 7-10
retained
89.
449 summary paragraph all redactions retained
90.
91.
92.
454 summary paragraph, paragraphs 5, 8, 12 and
16
redactions retained
93.
455 page 1, paragraphs 3 and 4 summaries
94.
95.
redactions retained
96.
redactions retained
97.
462 page 2, paragraph 9; page 3, paragraph 10 word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
retained
98.
464 page 1, summary paragraph, paragraph 5;
page 2, paragraphs 6-10
redactions retained
99.
retained
-11-

Document
Number
100.
466 page 4, paragraphs 20-24 lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
101.
487 portions of pages 5-6; pages 7-8 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
102.
616 entire document word substitutions
103.
664 pages 1; 7 lifts, balance of redactions retained
104.
105.
106.
675 pages 3-4; page 8, portion of top paragraph;
page 10; page 11, paragraph E; page 13
lifts, balance of redactions retained
107.
108.
109.
706 pages 18; 21; 23; 25; 28; 31; 39-41; 43 lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
110.
707 pages 14-17; 20-21 lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
111.
710 pages 18; 20; 22-25; 27; 31; 34 lifts, balance of redactions retained
112.
711 pages 11; 25; 27; 37; 41; 43-44; 57; bottom
of page 67; pages 68-69; 112-119
all redactions retained
113.
114.
772 pages 5-6; 15; portions of page 18; page 62 lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
-12-

Document
Number
115.
773 page 11; page 12, lines 10-22; pages 13; 15;
17; page 19, line 19; page 44, lines 19-26;
pages 52; 54-56; 64
lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
116.
907 pages 1; 7-8 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
117.
908 pages 4-5; page 12, paragraphs 28-29 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
118.
933 page 6, paragraph 401.19 lifts, balance of redactions retained
119.
935 page 1, paragraph 3; page 5, portions of
paragraph 1; page 6
120.
retained
121.
redactions retained
122.
953 page 1 summaries
123.
redactions retained
124.
redactions retained
125.
126.
-13-

Document
Number
127.
959 entire document lifts, word substitutions
128.
redactions retained
129.
redactions retained
130.
redactions retained
131.
979 pages 1-2, paragraphs 1-11 summaries
132.
retained
133.
987 page 1, paragraph 3; page 9 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
134.
989 page 1 lifts, word substitutions, summaries
135.
136.
137.
redactions retained
138.
997 entire document lifts, summaries
139.
retained
-14-

Document
Number
140.
1000 second redacted phrase all redactions retained
141.
142.
143.
1005 page 2, summary paragraph and paragraph
6; page 3, paragraph 11
retained
144.
1012 page 1 word substitutions
145.
1014 pages 7-10 all redactions retained
146.
redactions retained
147.
148.
1028 paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 8 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
149.
1030 page 1, paragraph 7; page 2; page 3,
paragraph 5
word substitutions, summaries
150.
1031 page 1; page 2, paragraphs 4 and 6 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
151.
1033 pages 1-2, last paragraph lifts, word substitutions, summaries
152.
-15-

Document
Number
153.
redactions retained
154.
redactions retained
155.
redactions retained
156.
redactions retained
157.
158.
1045 page 3, dates, numbers, references to an
individual
159.
160.
1054 page 1, paragraphs 1 and 7; page 3 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
161.
162.
1058 entire document word substitutions
163.
164.
redactions retained
-16-

Document
Number
165.
166.
1062 page 1, paragraph c and d word substitutions
167.
168.
1064 all dates and numbers lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
169.
170.
171.
172.
1070 pages 1 and 2 lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
173.
1072 subject line lifts
174.
175.
1074 all dates and numbers word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
176.
1075 all dates and numbers all redactions retained
177.
178.
179.
180.
-17-

Document
Number
181.
182.
183.
1082 page 1, paragraph 6 summaries, balance of redactions retained
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
-18-

Document
Number
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
redactions retained
203.
204.
1125 page 12, paragraph 4; page 13, paragraph 5 lifts, balance of redactions retained
205.
1127 pages 34, 35, 39, 49-56, 58-60, 63, 64 and
69
redactions retained
206.
1147 page 2, paragraph 4 and first lines of
paragraph 5; pages 3-5; page 6, paragraphs
C-D; page 7
redactions retained
207.
1157 pages 1-2, paragraphs 1 and 5; page 2,
paragraphs C, D, H and last paragraph
lifts, word substitutions, balance of redaction retained
208.
1159 page 2 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
209.
-19-

Document
Number
redactions retained
210.
1163 page 1; portions of pages 2 and 4 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
211.
1165 portions of page 3; page 4 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
212.
213.
1170 pages 2-7 summaries
214.
1171 page 3, last paragraph; page 4, first and last
paragraphs
summaries
215.
1172 pages 2-5 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
216.
1173 portions of pages 1 and 2 word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
217.
1177 page 1, last paragraph lifts, word substitutions
218.
redactions retained
219.
1180 pages 1-5 word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
220.
221.
1191 pages 1; 3-4 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
222.
1201 portions of page 2, paragraph 6 lifts, summaries
-20-

Document
Number
223.
1205 page 6, paragraph 1; portions of pages 7 and
8; page 16, last paragraph; portions of page
18; page 21, last paragraph
retained
224.
1207 page 2, paragraph 2, portions of paragraph
6; page 3, portions of first paragraph and
paragraphs C, D
word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
225.
1208 page 1; page 2, paragraphs 8-10 lifts, word substitutions, summaries
226.
redactions retained
227.
1233 pages 3-4; page 7, paragraph 5 lifts, word substitutions, summaries
228.
1239 pages 6-7; 9-11 summaries
229.
1240 portions of page 2 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
230.
1241 page 1 lifts, summaries
231.
redactions retained
232.
1245 page 1, paragraph 2 summaries, balance of redactions retained
233.
1251 pages 1-2 summaries
234.
1260 page 1 word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
235.
-21-

Document
Number
236.
1284 all dates; page 1, paragraph 4 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
237.
238.
239.
1323 page 1, first and last paragraphs; page 2 word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
retained
240.
1329 portions of page 1 word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
241.
242.
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
249.
1380 page 1-2 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
250.
redactions retained
-22-

Document
Number
251.
252.
253.
254.
255.
1394 portions of page 3; pages 4-8 summaries
256.
retained
257.
258.
redactions retained
259.
redactions retained
260.
redactions retained
261.
redactions retained
262.
1502 pages 74;77 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
263.
-23-

Document
Number
264.
DFAIT 2 page 3; portions of page 5 word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
265.
DFAIT 3 portions of page 3; pages 4-6; portions of
page 7; portions of page 8
redactions retained
266.
DFAIT 4 portions of pages 11 and 12 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
267.
DFAIT 5 page 3; portions of page 6, paragraph G;
page 7
redactions retained
268.
DFAIT 7 page 4, paragraphs 4-6; page 6; page 7,
paragraphs 4-5; page 9, portions of
paragraph 3; portions of page 10
269.
DFAIT 8 page 3; page 4, paragraphs 1-3; page 5;
page 6, paragraphs 1-3; pages 7-8, portions
of paragraphs 2-3 and 5
270.
DFAIT 9 page 3, paragraph 7; page 4, paragraph 8;
page 7, paragraph 7; page 8, paragraph 8;
portions of page 9; page 10, paragraphs c
and d; page 11
redactions retained
271.
DFAIT 10 page 4, paragraph 5; page 5, paragraph 10;
portions of page 6
272.
DFAIT 11 pages 1; 3-9; page 10, paragraph d, e and
last sentence; portions of page 11
redactions retained
273.
DFAIT 12 pages 3-5; page 8, paragraphs c, d and e word substitutions, summaries, balance of redactions
-24-

Document
Number
retained
274.
DFAIT 13 pages 1; 3-4; page 6, paragraph 4; portions
of page 7; page 8, paragraph d
retained
275.
DFAIT 14 pages 2-3; 5-6; portions of page 8 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
276.
DFAIT 15 pages 4-5; portions of page 7; page 8,
portions of paragraph 3
redactions retained
277.
DFAIT 16 pages 1-6; portions of page 7; page 8,
paragraphs c and d
retained
278.
DFAIT 17 pages 3-6; page 8, paragraph 1c lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
279.
DFAIT 18 page 3; page 4, paragraphs 1 and 3; page 5;
page 6, paragraphs 1 and 3
280.
DFAIT 19 pages 3-6; portions of page 8 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
281.
282.
283.
DFAIT 22 pages 3-5 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
284.
DFAIT 23 pages 1; 3-4 all redactions retained
285.
DFAIT 25 page 3; portions of page 4; page 5; dates
and numbers in pages 8, 10, 13-14, 16-17
-25-

Document
Number
286.
DFAIT 26 pages 2-5 word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
287.
DFAIT 27 pages 2-4 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
288.
redactions retained
289.
redactions retained
290.
DFAIT 33 page 2; page 3, paragraphs 1, 4 and 8; page
4, paragraph 11, and portions of the heading
redactions retained
291.
DFAIT 34 pages 1-3; portions of page 4; page 5 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
292.
DFAIT 36 page 1, portions of paragraph 3 summaries
293.
DFAIT 38 page 2, portions of paragraph 3 all redactions retained
294.
DFAIT 39 portions of page 2 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
295.
296.
DFAIT 43 portions of page 2 all redactions retained
297.
DFAIT 51 entire document lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
298.
-26-

Document
Number
299.
300.
301.
DFAIT 61 portions of page 1 lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
302.
303.
DFAIT 63 page 1, portions of paragraph 1 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
304.
DFAIT 64 page 1 portions of paragraph 1 lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
305.
306.
307.
DFAIT 67 page 1, numbers and dates lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
308.
redactions retained
309.
redactions retained
310.
redactions retained
311.
redactions retained
-27-

Document
Number
312.
redactions retained
313.
redactions retained
314.
315.
316.
redactions retained
317.
redactions retained
318.
redactions retained
319.
redactions retained
320.
redactions retained
321.
redactions retained
322.
redactions retained
-28-

Document
Number
323.
redactions retained
324.
redactions retained
325.
redactions retained
326.
redactions retained
327.
redactions retained
328.
redactions retained
329.
redactions retained
330.
redactions retained
331.
redactions retained
332.
redactions retained
333.
-29-

Document
Number
redactions retained
334.
redactions retained
335.
DFAIT 95 page 1, numbers and dates lifts, word substitutions, balance of redactions retained
336.
redactions retained
337.
redactions retained
338.
redactions retained
339.
redactions retained
340.
redactions retained
341.
redactions retained
342.
redactions retained
343.
redactions retained
-30-

Document
Number
344.
redactions retained
345.
redactions retained
346.
redactions retained
347.
DFAIT 107 page 1, numbers and dates all redactions retained
348.
redactions retained
349.
redactions retained
350.
redactions retained
351.
redactions retained
352.
redactions retained
353.
DFAIT 113 page 1, numbers and dates lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
354.
DFAIT 114 page 1, numbers and dates lifts, summaries, balance of redactions retained
355.
DFAIT 115 page 1, numbers and dates all redactions retained
-31-

Document
Number
356.
DFAIT 116 page 1, numbers and dates word substitutions
357.
DFAIT 126 page 1, portions of paragraph 2; page 2,
paragraphs 5-6; page 3, paragraph 7
redactions retained
358.
DFAIT 141 entire document lifts, word substitutions, summaries, balance of
redactions retained
359.
redactions retained
360.
DFAIT 147 page 4 summaries
361.
DFAIT 149 pages 3-4 summaries
362.
redactions retained

TABLE DES MATIRES
362 DOCUMENTS CONSTITUANT UNE PRIORIT POUR LE COMIT SPCIAL
LGENDE
Le prsent guide permet dinterprter les dcisions prises par le Groupe dexaminateurs au sujet des 362 documents, ou des parties de
ceux-ci, ports son attention par le Comit spcial.
La table des matires ci-dessous fournit le numro de chaque document et prcise si le document complet, ou seulement une page ou
un paragraphe de celui-ci, a t examin. Le Groupe dexaminateurs na pris de dcision concernant les parties des documents qui ne
sont pas mentionnes ci-dessous, car elles nont pas t portes son attention par le Comit spcial. Le caviardage a donc t
maintenu dans ces parties.
La table des matires indique la dcision prise par le Groupe dexaminateurs en ce qui a trait aux parties des documents qui lui ont t
soumises.
En ce qui concerne chaque partie examine, il a dcid : a) de supprimer le caviardage, b) de remplacer certains termes, c) dinsrer un
rsum ou d) de maintenir le caviardage.
Dans les documents qui suivent la table des matires, les dcisions prises par le Groupe dexaminateurs sont reprsentes de la
manire suivante :
1. Encadrement dune zone en pointill = = changement mis en uvre par le Groupe dexaminateurs;
2. Mise dun texte entre des lignes pointilles sans autre signe typographique = suppression du caviardage (rtablissement du texte
initial);
3. Mise entre parenthses dun texte = ( ) = remplacement de certains termes;
4. Mise entre crochets dun texte = [ ] = rsum;
5. Mise en zone noire continue dun texte = = maintien du caviardage.
- 2 -

Numro du
document
Sections cites Dcision du Groupe dexperts-arbitres
1.
7 page 1; page 4, paragraphe 12; page 6,
paragraphes 17-19
suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
2.
10 page 6, paragraphe M; page 7 tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
3.
14 pages 17; 20 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
4.
15 document complet suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
5.
18 pages 1; 6 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
6.
55 page 1 aucun caviardage maintenu
7.
57 page 4, dernier paragraphe; page 5, deux
premiers paragraphes
suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
8.
61 page 2 rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
9.
caviardage maintenu
10.
78 document complet rsums
11.
90 pages 1-2 aucun caviardage maintenu
12.
96 document complet suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
13.
102 pages 1-2 rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
- 3 -
Numro du
document
14.
108 page 1, paragraphes 3-4; page 2, paragraphes 2-
3
caviardage maintenu
15.
113 page 1, paragraphe 3; pages 7-8 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
16.
114 page 1 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
17.
115 document complet suppressions, rsums
18.
caviardage maintenu
19.
caviardage maintenu
20.
maintenu
21.
138 document complet suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
22.
143 document complet suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
23.
144 document complet rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
24.
145 document complet suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
25.
caviardage maintenu
- 4 -
Numro du
document
26.
27.
caviardage maintenu
28.
caviardage maintenu
29.
30.
maintenu
31.
174 pages 2-4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
32.
33.
caviardage maintenu
34.
192 pages 2-3 suppressions, rsums
35.
193 page 2 suppressions, remplacement de termes
36.
196 pages 1; 4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
37.
maintenu
38.
222 pages 2-3 suppressions, rsums
- 5 -
Numro du
document
39.
40.
242 document complet remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
41.
maintenu
42.
caviardage maintenu
43.
maintenu
44.
maintenu
45.
maintenu
46.
maintenu
47.
maintenu
48.
maintenu
49.
maintenu
50.
- 6 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
51.
280 pages 5; 15; 17; page 25, ligne 3; page 36,
lignes 22-25; page 37, ligne 1; page 38, lignes
21-22; page 39, lignes 24-25; pages 49-51; 54-
57; 61-62; 75; 81-84; 90; 95; 105-106; 109;
114-115; 122; 124; 135; 138; 143-145; 149;
154-155; 157; 159; 162-163
suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
52.
282 pages 7; 9; 31-32 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
53.
288 page 1, paragraphe 4; pages 2-7; 11-16 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
54.
300 toutes les dates et tous les numros; parties de la
page 8; pages 11-12; parties de la page 14;
parties de la page 18; parties des pages 20-21;
parties de la page 23; page 27; parties de la
page 28; parties de la page 30; pages 32-33;
parties de la page 39; pages 46; 91; 182; parties
de la page 256; pages 257; 263; 279
55.
304 parties de la page 16; parties de la page 24;
parties des pages 38-39
caviardage maintenu
56.
308 toutes les dates; page 17; page 27, paragraphe 2
et 3b; page 28, parties du paragraphe 6; page 31,
parties du paragraphe 15; page 32, paragraphes
16-17; page 33; page 67, parties du dernier
paragraphe
caviardage maintenu
57.
310 parties de la page 1, paragraphe 2 suppressions
- 7 -
Numro du
document
58.
314 page 7, paragraphe c; pages 19-20 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
59.
321 pages 13; 17 rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
60.
322 parties des pages 4 et 5; page 6; page 8, parties
du paragraphe 4; page 9, parties du paragraphe
5; parties des pages 10-12; parties des pages 26
et 27; page 32, parties du dernier paragraphe;
parties de la page 36; page 39, parties du
premier paragraphe; page 40, parties du premier
paragraphe; parties de la page 41; parties de la
page 47; parties de la page 53
rsums
61.
342 page 10 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
62.
353 page 14, paragraphe 14; page 18, paragraphe c;
parties de la page 19
63.
383 page 5, paragraphe 10 remplacement de termes
64.
385 pages 1-2 suppressions
65.
391 page 40, paragraphes H, I et J; parties de la
page 48; page 49, paragraphe D; page 50,
paragraphe F; page 51, paragraphe G; page 52,
paragraphe N; page 53, paragraphes A, C et E;
parties de la page 54; page 55, paragraphe B;
page 59, paragraphe E; pages 62-63
caviardage maintenu
66.
392 pages 10; 13-14; page 21, lignes 5-13; parties de
la page 26; pages 41-47; pages 50; 52-54;
parties de la page 56; page 58, ligne 25; page
caviardage maintenu
- 8 -
Numro du
document
59; pages 63-67; pages 69; 71; page 72,
ligne 25; pages 75-79, 85, 87-88, 90, 92, 94-95,
101, 106-107, 109-110, 113-119; 134
67.
395 page 16, lignes 16-20; page 20, ligne 23;
page 21, paragraphe 20; page 54; parties de la
page 59; pages 63; 67; page 83, ligne 20;
pages 100-103
68.
396 pages 39-42; 50-51; 53; 61; 63-64; page 65,
lignes 1-5 et 11-25; pages 66-67; 75; 79-82;
84-87; 89-92
remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
69.
397 parties de la page 9; pages 10, 14-15, 24-28,
30-33, 51, 58-65, 68, 70-71, 73-74, 76-77,
79-80 et 84
70.
398 pages 7, 13, 18, 24-25, 27-28, 35-38, 45-46,
50-52, 57 et 59; page 60, lignes 7-10; pages 63-
69; page 70, lignes 3-8; pages 72, 75-76, 86-87,
92, 94, 97-101 et 104
caviardage maintenu
71.
409 pages 25, 28 et 99-101 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
72.
caviardage maintenu
73.
caviardage maintenu
74.
maintenu
- 9 -
Numro du
document
75.
caviardage maintenu
76.
429 page 2, paragraphes 8 et 9; page 4, paragraphe
20
rsums
77.
430 paragraphe de synthse; paragraphes 3, 4, 5, 6,
10 et 11
maintenu
78.
431 page 2, paragraphes 7 et 9 remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
79.
433 page 1, paragraphes 1, 6 et 7; page 2,
paragraphe 10
rsums
80.
434 page 3, paragraphe 4 rsums
81.
437 pages 2-3, paragraphes 11, 13 et 14 remplacement de termes, rsums
82.
83.
caviardage maintenu
84.
caviardage maintenu
85.
445 page 2, paragraphes 11 et 12; pages 3-4 remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
86.
- 10 -
Numro du
document
87.
447 document complet remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
88.
448 page 1, paragraphe de synthse, paragraphe 6;
page 2, paragraphes 7-10
maintenu
89.
449 paragraphe de synthse tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
90.
91.
92.
454 paragraphe de synthse, paragraphes 5, 8, 12 et
16
caviardage maintenu
93.
455 page 1, paragraphes 3 et 4 rsums
94.
95.
caviardage maintenu
96.
caviardage maintenu
97.
462 page 2, paragraphe 9; page 3, paragraphe 10 remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
98.
464 page 1, paragraphe de synthse, paragraphe 5;
page 2, paragraphes 6-10
caviardage maintenu
99.
- 11 -
Numro du
document
maintenu
100.
466 page 4, paragraphes 20-24 suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
101.
487 parties des pages 5-6; pages 7-8 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
102.
616 document complet remplacement de termes
103.
664 pages 1 et 7 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
104.
105.
106.
675 pages 3-4; page 8, partie du premier paragraphe;
page 10; page 11, paragraphe E; page 13
suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
107.
108.
109.
706 pages 18, 21, 23, 25, 28, 31, 39-41 et 43 suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
110.
707 pages 14-17 et 20-21 suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
111.
710 pages 18, 20, 22-25, 27, 31 et 34 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
112.
711 pages 11, 25, 27, 37, 41, 43-44 et 57; bas de
page 67; pages 68-69 et 112-119
tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
113.
735 page 1; paragraphe 2 rsums
- 12 -
Numro du
document
114.
772 pages 5-6 et 15; parties de la page 18; page 62 suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
115.
773 page 11; page 12, lignes 10-22; pages 13, 15 et
17; page 19, ligne 19; page 44, lignes 19-26;
pages 52, 54-56 et 64
suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
116.
907 pages 1; 7-8 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
117.
908 pages 4-5; page 12, paragraphes 28-29 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
118.
933 page 6, paragraphe 401.19 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
119.
935 page 1, paragraphe 3; page 5, parties du
paragraphe 1; page 6
maintenu
120.
maintenu
121.
caviardage maintenu
122.
953 page 1 rsums
123.
caviardage maintenu
124.
caviardage maintenu
125.
- 13 -
Numro du
document
126.
127.
959 document complet suppressions, remplacement de termes
128.
caviardage maintenu
129.
caviardage maintenu
130.
caviardage maintenu
131.
979 pages 1-2, paragraphes 1-11 rsums
132.
maintenu
133.
987 page 1, paragraphe 3; page 9 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
134.
989 page 1 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
135.
991 page 1 rsums
136.
137.
caviardage maintenu
138.
997 document complet suppressions, rsums
- 14 -
Numro du
document
139.
maintenu
140.
1000 deuxime phrase caviarde tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
141.
142.
143.
1005 page 2, paragraphe de synthse et paragraphe 6;
page 3, paragraphe 11
maintenu
144.
1012 page 1 remplacement de termes
145.
1014 pages 7-10 tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
146.
caviardage maintenu
147.
148.
1028 paragraphes 3, 4, 5 et 8 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
149.
1030 page 1, paragraphe 7; page 2; page 3,
paragraphe 5
remplacement de termes, rsums
150.
1031 page 1; page 2, paragraphes 4 et 6 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
151.
1033 pages 1-2, dernier paragraphe suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
- 15 -
Numro du
document
152.
153.
caviardage maintenu
154.
caviardage maintenu
155.
caviardage maintenu
156.
caviardage maintenu
157.
158.
1045 page 3, dates, nombres et rfrences une
personne
maintenu
159.
maintenu
160.
1054 page 1, paragraphes 1 et 7; page 3 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
161.
maintenu
162.
1058 document complet remplacement de termes
163.
- 16 -
Numro du
document
164.
caviardage maintenu
165.
maintenu
166.
1062 page 1, paragraphes c et d remplacement de termes
167.
maintenu
168.
1064 toutes les dates et tous les numros suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
169.
maintenu
170.
maintenu
171.
maintenu
172.
1070 pages 1 et 2 suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
173.
1072 ligne dobjet suppressions
174.
maintenu
175.
1074 toutes les dates et tous les numros remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
- 17 -
Numro du
document
176.
1075 toutes les dates et tous les numros tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
177.
maintenu
178.
maintenu
179.
maintenu
180.
maintenu
181.
182.
maintenu
183.
1082 page 1, paragraphe 6 rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
184.
185.
186.
187.
maintenu
188.
- 18 -
Numro du
document
189.
190.
191.
192.
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
maintenu
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
caviardage maintenu
203.
1119 page 18 rsums
- 19 -
Numro du
document
204.
1125 page 12, paragraphe 4; page 13, paragraphe 5 suppressions, reste du caviardage maintenu
205.
1127 pages 34, 35, 39, 49-56, 58-60, 63, 64 et 69 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
206.
1147 page 2, paragraphe 4 et premires lignes du
paragraphe 5; pages 3-5; page 6, paragraphes C-
D; page 7
caviardage maintenu
207.
1157 pages 1-2, paragraphes 1 et 5; page 2,
paragraphes C, D, H et dernier paragraphe
maintenu
208.
1159 page 2 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
209.
caviardage maintenu
210.
1163 page 1; parties des pages 2 et 4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
211.
1165 parties de la page 3; page 4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
212.
1166 page 3 rsums
213.
1170 pages 2-7 rsums
214.
1171 page 3, dernier paragraphe; page 4, premier et
dernier paragraphes
rsums
215.
1172 pages 2-5 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
- 20 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
216.
1173 parties des pages 1 et 2 remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
217.
1177 page 1, dernier paragraphe suppressions, remplacement de termes
218.
caviardage maintenu
219.
1180 pages 1-5 remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
220.
221.
1191 pages 1 et 3-4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
222.
1201 parties de la page 2, paragraphe 6 suppressions, rsums
223.
1205 page 6, paragraphe 1; parties des pages 7 et 8;
page 16, dernier paragraphe; parties de la page
18; page 21, dernier paragraphe
maintenu
224.
1207 page 2, paragraphe 2, parties du paragraphe 6;
page 3, parties du premier paragraphe et des
paragraphes C et D
remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
225.
1208 page 1; page 2, paragraphes 8-10 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
226.
caviardage maintenu
227.
1233 pages 3-4; page 7, paragraphe 5 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums
- 21 -
Numro du
document
228.
1239 pages 6-7; 9-11 rsums
229.
1240 parties de la page 2 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
230.
1241 page 1 suppressions, rsums
231.
caviardage maintenu
232.
1245 page 1, paragraphe 2 rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
233.
1251 pages 1-2 rsums
234.
1260 page 1 remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
235.
maintenu
236.
1284 toutes les dates; page 1, paragraphe 4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
237.
maintenu
238.
239.
1323 page 1, premier et dernier paragraphes; page 2 remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
240.
1329 parties de la page 1 remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
- 22 -
Numro du
document
241.
maintenu
242.
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
maintenu
249.
maintenu
250.
caviardage maintenu
251.
maintenu
252.
253.
254.
- 23 -
Numro du
document
255.
1394 parties de la page 3; pages 4-8 rsums
256.
maintenu
257.
maintenu
258.
caviardage maintenu
259.
caviardage maintenu
260.
caviardage maintenu
261.
caviardage maintenu
262.
1502 pages 74 et 77 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
263.
264.
DFAIT 2 page 3; parties de la page 5 remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
265.
DFAIT 3 parties de la page 3; pages 4-6; parties de la
page 7; parties de la page 8
caviardage maintenu
266.
DFAIT 4 parties des pages 11 et 12 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
- 24 -
Numro du
document
267.
DFAIT 5 page 3; parties de la page 6, paragraphe G; page
7
caviardage maintenu
268.
DFAIT 7 page 4, paragraphes 4-6; page 6; page 7,
paragraphes 4-5; page 9, parties du paragraphe
3; parties de la page 10
269.
DFAIT 8 page 3; page 4, paragraphes 1-3; page 5; page 6,
paragraphes 1-3; pages 7-8, parties des
paragraphes 2-3 et 5
maintenu
270.
DFAIT 9 page 3, paragraphe 7; page 4, paragraphe 8;
page 7, paragraphe 7; page 8, paragraphe 8;
parties de la page 9; page 10, paragraphes c et d;
page 11
caviardage maintenu
271.
DFAIT 10 page 4, paragraphe 5; page 5, paragraphe 10;
parties de la page 6
272.
DFAIT 11 pages 1 et 3-9; page 10, paragraphe d, e et
dernire phrase; parties du page 11
caviardage maintenu
273.
DFAIT 12 pages 3-5; page 8, paragraphes c, d et e remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du caviardage
maintenu
274.
DFAIT 13 pages 1 et 3-4; page 6, paragraphe 4; parties de
la page 7; page 8, paragraphe d
maintenu
275.
DFAIT 14 pages 2-3 et 5-6; parties de la page 8 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
276.
DFAIT 15 pages 4-5; parties de la page 7; page 8, parties
du paragraphe 3
caviardage maintenu
- 25 -
Numro du
document
277.
DFAIT 16 pages 1-6; parties de la page 7; page 8,
paragraphes c et d
maintenu
278.
DFAIT 17 pages 3-6; page 8, paragraphe 1c suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
279.
DFAIT 18 page 3; page 4, paragraphes 1 et 3; page 5; page
6, paragraphes 1 et 3
280.
DFAIT 19 pages 3-6; parties de la page 8 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
281.
maintenu
282.
maintenu
283.
DFAIT 22 pages 3-5 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
284.
DFAIT 23 pages 1; 3-4 tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
285.
DFAIT 25 page 3; parties de la page 4; page 5; dates et
nombres des pages 8, 10, 13-14 et 16-17
maintenu
286.
DFAIT 26 pages 2-5 remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage maintenu
287.
DFAIT 27 pages 2-4 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
288.
- 26 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
289.
caviardage maintenu
290.
DFAIT 33 page 2; page 3, paragraphes 1, 4 et 8; page 4,
paragraphe 11 et parties du titre
caviardage maintenu
291.
DFAIT 34 pages 1 et 3; parties de la page 4; page 5 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
292.
DFAIT 36 page 1, parties du paragraphe 3 rsums
293.
DFAIT 38 page 2, parties du paragraphe 3 tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
294.
DFAIT 39 parties de la page 2 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
295.
maintenu
296.
DFAIT 43 parties de la page 2 tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
297.
DFAIT 51 document complet suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
298.
maintenu
299.
maintenu
300.
- 27 -
Numro du
document
maintenu
301.
DFAIT 61 parties de la page 1 suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
302.
maintenu
303.
DFAIT 63 page 1, parties du paragraphe 1 suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
304.
maintenu
305.
maintenu
306.
maintenu
307.
DFAIT 67 page 1, nombres et dates suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
308.
caviardage maintenu
309.
caviardage maintenu
310.
caviardage maintenu
311.
- 28 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
312.
caviardage maintenu
313.
caviardage maintenu
314.
maintenu
315.
maintenu
316.
caviardage maintenu
317.
caviardage maintenu
318.
caviardage maintenu
319.
caviardage maintenu
320.
caviardage maintenu
321.
caviardage maintenu
322.
- 29 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
323.
caviardage maintenu
324.
caviardage maintenu
325.
caviardage maintenu
326.
caviardage maintenu
327.
caviardage maintenu
328.
caviardage maintenu
329.
caviardage maintenu
330.
caviardage maintenu
331.
caviardage maintenu
332.
caviardage maintenu
333.
- 30 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
334.
caviardage maintenu
335.
DFAIT 95 page 1, nombres et dates suppressions, remplacement de termes, reste du caviardage
maintenu
336.
caviardage maintenu
337.
caviardage maintenu
338.
caviardage maintenu
339.
caviardage maintenu
340.
caviardage maintenu
341.
caviardage maintenu
342.
caviardage maintenu
343.
caviardage maintenu
344.
- 31 -
Numro du
document
caviardage maintenu
345.
caviardage maintenu
346.
caviardage maintenu
347.
DFAIT 107 page 1, nombres et dates tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
348.
caviardage maintenu
349.
caviardage maintenu
350.
caviardage maintenu
351.
caviardage maintenu
352.
caviardage maintenu
353.
DFAIT 113 page 1, nombres et dates suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
354.
DFAIT 114 page 1, nombres et dates suppressions, rsums, reste du caviardage maintenu
355.
DFAIT 115 page 1, nombres et dates tous les passages caviards sont maintenus
356.
DFAIT 116 page 1, nombres et dates remplacement de termes
- 32 -
Numro du
document
357.
DFAIT 126 page 1, parties du paragraphe 2; page 2,
paragraphes 5-6; page 3, paragraphe 7
caviardage maintenu
358.
DFAIT 141 document complet suppressions, remplacement de termes, rsums, reste du
caviardage maintenu
359.
caviardage maintenu
360.
DFAIT 147 page 4 rsums
361.
DFAIT 149 pages 3-4 rsums
362.
caviardage maintenu

AFGHAN DETAINEE DOCUMENT REVIEW:
REPORT BY THE PANELOFARBITERS
ON ITS WORKAND METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINING WHAT
REDACTED INFORMATION CAN BE DISCLOSED
The Honourable Claire LHeureux-Dub
The Honourable Frank Iacobucci
April 15, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE............................................................................................................................ I
I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
II. WORK ASSIGNED TO THE PANEL BY THE MOU...........................................3
III. THE PANELS APPROACH AND WORK IN REVIEWING
NSC REDACTIONS .................................................................................................6
A. Introduction.......................................................................................................6
B. Relevant Case Law............................................................................................7
C. The Panels Approach to Reviewing NSC Redactions .....................................10
Overall Approach............................................................................................10
Detainee Information.......................................................................................11
Confidential Communications with Foreign Officials and Organizations.........12
Criticism of Foreign (primarily Afghan) Institutions and Officials...................13
Information about or from the ICRC ...............................................................15
Third party Information...................................................................................17
Names of Afghan Officials..............................................................................17
Information relating to Special Forces .............................................................17
Information about Gun Shot Residue Testing ..................................................18
D. Status of the Panels Review of NSC Information ...........................................18
IV. PANELS APPROACH AND WORK IN REVIEWING INFORMATION
SUBJECT TO CLAIMS OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND
CABINET CONFIDENTIALITY ..........................................................................19
A. Introduction.....................................................................................................19
B. Solicitor-Client Privilege.................................................................................20
Legal Requirements ........................................................................................20
Status of the Panels Review of Solicitor-Client Privilege Claims....................21
C. Cabinet Confidentiality ...................................................................................22
Legal Requirements ........................................................................................22
Status of the Panels Review of Cabinet Confidentiality Claims ......................23
APPENDIX: Memorandum of Understanding dated June 15, 2010
- i -
PREFACE
It is with heavy hearts that we write these words in tribute to our colleague on the Panel of
arbiters, the Honourable Donald I. Brenner, former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia. An outstanding lawyer, jurist and reformer, Don contributed greatly to our
work under the Memorandum of Understanding. As recently as two days before his sudden
passing, we and Don met all day, and made great progress, aided by Dons typically insightful
comments and collegial approach.
Although he is, tragically, no longer with us, we can say that this report reflects Dons views,
and for that we are deeply grateful. We offer his family our profound condolences.
Claire LHeureux-Dub Frank Iacobucci
I. INTRODUCTION
1. On June 15, 2010, the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, Prime Minister, the
Honourable Michael Ignatieff, Leader of the Official Opposition, and Mr. Gilles Duceppe,
Leader of the Bloc Qubcois, entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the MOU) in
order to resolve a dispute respecting the disclosure of government documents relating to the
transfer of Afghan detainees fromCanadian Forces to Afghan authorities.
2. The MOU, a copy of which is an Appendix to this report, provided for the
appointment of an Ad Hoc Committee of Parliamentarians, composed of one member and one
alternate member from each of the parties whose leaders executed the MOU, and a three-
member Panel of Arbiters, which it stated was to comprise three eminent jurists, who shall
have judicial expertise. The MOU gave to the Committee the task of reviewing the
information in the documents that had been redacted by the government for reasons of
national security, national defence and international relations and referring to the Panel the
redacted information the Committee decided should be disclosed because it is relevant and
necessary for holding the government to account. The MOU gave to the Panel the role of
determining how the information referred to it may be made available to Members of
Parliament and the public without compromising the interests the redactions are intended to
protect.
3. The Honourable Stphane Dion, Mr. Luc Desnoyers, Mr. Laurie Hawn, Mr. Pierre
Lemieux, Mr. Richard Nadeau, and the Honourable Bryon Wilfert were appointed as the
members of the Ad Hoc Committee. We, together with the Honourable Donald I. Brenner,
were appointed as the three members of the Panel. Following our appointment, and with the
assistance of our staff, we worked in conjunction with the Committee, the Privy Council
Office, and the Department of Justice to carry out the tasks assigned to us by the MOU.
4. Tragically, on March 12, 2011, Donald Brenner passed away suddenly. Before his
death he made a significant contribution to the approach taken by the Panel and the
preparation of this report, and he participated fully in the determinations made by the Panel up
to his untimely death.
- 2 -
5. The purpose of this report is to explain how we have carried out the tasks assigned to
us by the MOU, and in particular the methodology we have used for assessing whether and, if
so, how redacted information referred to us by the Committee can be disclosed. The report
describes:
(a) the work assigned to us by the MOU, its relationship to the work carried out by
the Committee and by government officials, and the steps we have taken to
carry it out;
(b) our approach to reviewing redactions made by the government on grounds of
national security, national defence or international relations;
(c) our approach to reviewing redactions made by the government on grounds of
solicitor-client privilege and Cabinet confidentiality; and
(d) the status of our work.
6. Together with this report, we had planned to deliver to the Committee the first set of
documents that we have reviewed in accordance with our mandate under the MOU and that
are ready for release. Our intention was to continue to deliver documents to the Committee as
we completed our review of themand they became ready for release.
7. As the Committee members and the government officials who have been involved in
this document review process are aware, this is the first time that a mechanism like that set
out in the MOU has been adopted in Canada or perhaps anywhere else. Carrying out the
complex tasks assigned to us by the MOU has called for difficult judgments. In making those
judgments we have been mindful of the high importance of the interests at stake in this
process. We have also had to consider and weigh a variety of factors, circumstances, and
potential consequences. We recognize that at the margins informed decision-makers can differ
on these judgments. However, we can say that what follows in this report and in our
determinations reflects our collective best efforts to arrive at our decisions through
collaborative discussion and careful evaluation to reach conclusions that we believe are
faithful to the letter and spirit of the MOU.
- 3 -
8. We are grateful for the cooperation and assistance we have received from the
Committee members and government officials in working through these issues and
developing solutions for these novel problems. Our discussions with the Committee members
have been constructive and professional. The Committee members have been conscientious
and committed in carrying out the role assigned to them in this process.
9. We also wish to recognize the ongoing contribution of our staff, both in providing us
with the information, analysis, and support necessary to enable us to make our determinations,
and in the painstaking and time-consuming process of implementing our decisions that we
describe below. Their insights and their hard work have been invaluable.
II. WORK ASSIGNED TO THE PANEL BY THE MOU
10. The Panels work, like that of the Committee and the government in relation to this
process, is governed by the terms of the MOU, which was entered into in order to resolve a
dispute that arose between the House of Commons and the government.
11. On December 10, 2009, the House of Commons adopted an order for the production
of government documents related to the transfer of Afghan detainees from the Canadian
Forces to Afghan authorities. As the signatories to the MOU have acknowledged, these
documents contain information the disclosure of which would be injurious to national
defence, international relations or national security if publicly released. The order made no
provision for confidential treatment of this information.
12. On April 27, 2010, the Speaker of the House of Commons concluded that it was
within the powers of the House of Commons to ask for the documents sought in the order.
However, the Speaker suggested that a mechanism be put in place by which these documents
could be made available to the House without compromising the security and confidentiality
of the information they contain. In accordance with the Speakers suggestion, all parties
reached an Agreement in Principle on May 14, 2010 to establish a mechanism of this kind.
The MOU, which was intended to implement the Agreement in Principle, was subsequently
executed by the leaders of all parties except the New Democratic Party.
- 4 -
13. The MOU provided for the establishment of the Committee and the Panel. It granted
to the Committee access to all documents listed in the December 10, 2009 House order,
including all relevant documents related to the transfer of Afghan detainees from the period
2001 to 2005 in order to understand the transfer arrangements post-2005, subject to strict
confidentiality measures. It provided for the Committee to receive these documents in a
manner that would disclose to Committee members the information redacted by the
government on grounds of national security, national defence or international relations. It also
established two distinct processes for reviewing redactions that the government had made to
the documents:
(a) an NSC information process for documents containing information the
government has redacted on grounds of national security confidentiality,
national defence or international relations (which we refer to together as
NSC); and
(b) a privileged / confidential information process for documents containing
information the government has redacted on grounds of solicitor-client
privilege or Cabinet confidentiality.
14. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the MOU set out the process for reviewing redactions made on
grounds of national security, national defence or international relations. That process calls for
the Committee to determine the information that is relevant and necessary to disclose, and the
Panel to determine how the relevant and necessary information will be made available without
compromising national security, national defence or international relations.
15. Paragraph 5 states:
With respect to every document that has been redacted, the ad
hoc committee will determine whether the information therein
is relevant to matters of importance to Members of Parliament,
particularly as it relates to the ongoing study on the transfer of
Afghan detainees currently under way at the House of
Commons Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in
Afghanistan, and whether the use of such information is
necessary for the purpose of holding the government to account.
The decisions of the ad hoc committee related to relevance shall
be final and unreviewable.
- 5 -
16. Paragraph 6 states:
Where the ad hoc committee determines that information is
both relevant and necessary, or upon the request of any Member
of the ad hoc committee, it will refer the disputed information
to a Panel of Arbiters, who will determine how the relevant and
necessary information will be made available to Members of
Parliament and the public without compromising national
security, national defence or international relations either by
redaction or the writing of summaries or such techniques as the
Panel may find appropriate, bearing in mind the basic objective
of maximizing disclosure and transparency. The Panel of
Arbiters should regularly consult with the Members of the ad
hoc committee to better understand what information the
Members believe to be relevant and the reason why. The
decisions of the Panel of Arbiters with respect to disclosure
shall be final and unreviewable.
17. As the terms of these paragraphs demonstrate, the MOU grants to the Committee the
sole responsibility for deciding what information redacted on national security, national
defence or international relations grounds is relevant and necessary to disclose, and to the
Panel the sole responsibility for determining how information will be disclosed without
compromising national security, national defence or international relations. Paragraph 6 states
that the Panel should regularly consult with the Committee members to better understand
what information the members believe to be relevant and why. But the Panel makes the final
decisions with respect to disclosure independently not only of the Committee but also of the
government.
18. Paragraph 7 of the MOU sets out the process for the review of information that the
government believes should not be disclosed on grounds of solicitor-client privilege or
Cabinet confidentiality. Paragraph 7 states:
The Panel of Arbiters can determine, at the request of the
government, that certain information should not be disclosed
due to the solicitor-client privilege. The Panel of Arbiters, after
consultation with the Clerk of the Privy Council, can also
determine, at the request of the government, that information
constituting Cabinet confidences should not be disclosed. In
both such cases, the Panel of Arbiters shall determine how
information contained in the documents may be made available
to Members of Parliament and the public without compromising
- 6 -
the solicitor-client privilege or the principle of Cabinet
confidentiality, by such techniques as the Panel may find
appropriate, bearing in mind the basic objective of maximizing
disclosure and transparency. Should the Panel of Arbiters
decide that certain information should not be disclosed, the
Panel will provide the rationale for its decisions to the ad hoc
committee.
III. THE PANELS APPROACH AND WORK IN REVIEWING NSC
REDACTIONS
A. Introduction
19. The Panels first and primary task under the MOU is to review the NSC redactions
information redacted by the government on the grounds of national security, national defence
or international relations which has been referred to the Panel by the Committee. As discussed
below, this review has been complex and challenging, requiring the review of many thousands
of pages of documents and numerous meetings between the Panel and its staff and the
Committee, as well as meetings and communications with government officials. One of the
main complications has been the technological and security issues involved in reviewing these
documents and preparing them in a form that is acceptable for disclosure. This process
requires not only that the Panel and its staff review and assess all redactions referred to it by
the Committee but also that the Panels decisions then be implemented by preparing each
document using software that permits the lifting of redactions of information that the Panel
has determined can be disclosed or the summarizing of information in a formthat is useful for
the purposes of disclosure but that does not compromise national security, national defence or
international relations.
20. In carrying out its review of NSC redactions, the Panel has taken into account the case
law that has been developed by the courts in determining, under section 38 of the Canada
Evidence Act,
1
claims that information should not be disclosed on the grounds that disclosure
would injure international relations, national defence or national security. Although, as
discussed below, the Canada Evidence Act does not apply to the Panels work, and there are
significant differences in wording between section 38 and the MOU, the section 38 case law

1
R.S,C. 1985, c. C-5.
- 7 -
has been helpful to the Panel in developing its approach to reviewing NSC documents. The
Panel has also benefitted from briefings that it and its staff have received from government
officials, who have explained how and why in their view the disclosure of the redacted
information would compromise national security, national defence or international relations.
B. Relevant Case Law
21. National security has been defined in a leading case as at minimum the
preservation of the Canadian way of life, including the safeguarding of the security of
persons, institutions and freedoms in Canada.
2
Courts have identified the types of
information that might be injurious to national security as including information that would
identify or tend to identify human sources and technical sources, identify or tend to identify
targets of surveillance, identify or tend to identify methods of operations and operational and
administrative policies, or jeopardize or tend to jeopardize the security of telecommunications
systems.
3
22. National defence has been defined in the same case using the following broad
definition, taken from Blacks Law Dictionary: 1. All measures taken by a nation to protect
itself against its enemies. A nations protection of its collective ideals and values is included
in the concept of national defence. 2. A nationals military establishment.
4
In another case, a
judge found that the disclosure of a videotape and transcripts relating to the Bosnia conflict
would be injurious to national defence and international relations. The videotape depicted
aerial bombing carried out by NATO-led forces in Bosnia. The transcripts contained
information respecting intelligence, intelligence capabilities, command and command
structure of the various forces in the Bosnian theatre of war, policies relating to the conduct of
military operations, military operations, the role and conduct of certain participants in the
Bosnian theatre and the identity and sources of targets. The judge found that disclosure of
some portions of the information would, among other things, undermine the trust necessary to

2
Canada (Attorney General) v. Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in relation to
Maher Arar, 2007 FC 766 at para. 68 (T.D.).
3
Henrie v. Canada (Security Intelligence Review Committee), [1989] 2 FC 229 at paras. 29-31 (T.D.), affd
[1992] F.C.J. No. 100 (C.A.); Canada (Attorney General) v. Kempo, [2004] FC 1678 at paras. 89-92 (T.D.);
Singh v. Canada (2000), 186 F.T.R. 1 at para. 32 (T.D.).
4
Arar, note 2 at para. 62.
- 8 -
make NATO effective, compromise Canadas role as a member of NATO, make Canadas
allies reluctant to share intelligence in the future (denying Canada access to information
necessary to protect civilians and troops) and compromise NATOs and Canadas ability to
conduct future military operations.
5

23. The Panel also notes that section 15 of the Access to Information Act,
6
which provides
for the non-disclosure of records containing information the disclosure of which would be
injurious to the defence of Canada, includes as examples information relating to military
tactics or strategy or relating to military exercises or operations; information relating to the
quantity, characteristics, capabilities or deployment of weapons or other defence equipment;
information relating to the characteristics, capabilities, performance, potential deployment,
functions or role of any defence establishment, military force or unit; and information
obtained or prepared for the purpose of intelligence relating to the defence of Canada or an
allied state.
24. International relations has been recognized in the case law as raising important
interests for several reasons. Among the most important, Canada is a net intelligence
importer, and therefore has an interest in maintaining reciprocal relationships with the policy,
intelligence and security agencies of other nations, particularly those of its closest allies.
7
As
well, Canada relies on its relationships with foreign nations to pursue its foreign policy
objectives, and promote human rights democracy and good governance abroad.
8
Among the
information most frequently engaged by the international relations interests is information
protected by the third party rule and criticisms of foreign countries or governments. The
third party rule states that communications and documents obtained in confidence from third
parties, generally allied states, should not be disclosed without the prior consent of the

5
Ribic v. Canada (Attorney General), 2003 FCT 10 at paras. 14-18 (T.D.); Canada (Attorney General) v. Ribic,
2003 FCT 43 at paras. 14-15 (T.D.); affd, Canada (Attorney General) v. Ribic, 2003 FCA 246.
6
R.S.C., 1985, c. A-1.
7
Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 at para. 68; Khadr v. Canada (Attorney
General), 2008 FC 549 at para. 93 (T.D.); Arar, note 2 at paras. 77-78, 80.
8
Khadr, note 7 at para. 74; Arar, note 2 at paras. 85-90
- 9 -
providing third party.
9
Criticisms by Canada of foreign governments may be protected by the
international relations interests, but not where the Canadian governments sole or primary
purpose for seeking non-disclosure is to shield itself from criticismor embarrassment.
10
25. In determining possible injury, courts applying section 38 have considered the
perspective of the informed reader and the principle of the mosaic effect. This requires
consideration of whether a person who is both knowledgeable regarding security matters and
is a member of or associated with a group which constitutes a threat or a potential threat to the
security of Canada could piece together items of information that might seem innocuous in
isolation to arrive at damaging deductions.
11
The courts have cautioned, however, that this
principle should not be over-extended there must be some genuine basis for concern based
on the particular facts.
12
26. The section 38 case law has established that information that has made its way into the
public domain will generally not be protected from disclosure. However, the courts have
recognized exceptions to this general rule where only a limited part of the information was
disclosed to the public, where the information is not widely known or accessible, where the
authenticity of the information is neither confirmed nor denied, and where the information
was inadvertently disclosed.
13
27. Although we have taken account of this section 38 case law, neither it nor the process
for its application has any direct application to our work under the MOU. Section 38 applies
only in a proceeding before a court, person or body with jurisdiction to compel the
production of information, a description that does not apply to the Panel. In addition, the
language of section 38 is different from the language used in the MOU in a number of

9
Canada (Attorney General) v. Khawaja, 2007 FC 490 at para. 139 (T.D.). The Federal Court has set out three
caveats to this rule: (1) Canada must attempt to obtain consent to disclosure before it can rely on the third party
rule; (2) the rule does not apply when a Canadian agency was aware of the information before having received it
from a foreign agency; and (3) the rule does not protect the mere existence of a relationship between Canada and
a foreign state, absent the exchange of information in a given case: Khawaja at paras. 146-148.
10
Arar, note 2 at paras. 82-84
11
Henrie, note 3 at para. 30
12
Khadr, note 7 at paras. 74-77; Arar, note 2 at para. 84
13
Arar, note 2 at para. 56.
- 10 -
important respects. Among other things, paragraph 6 of the MOU requires the Panel in
making its determinations to bear in mind the basic objective of maximizing disclosure and
transparency, without, at the same time, compromising national security, national defence
or international relations.
C. The Panels Approach to Reviewing NSC Redactions
Overall Approach
28. Taking into account all of these considerations, we have adopted the following
approach in reviewing the NSC redactions referred to us by the Committee. We emphasize
that we have not dealt with any redactions in portions of documents that were not referred to
us.
(a) First, we begin our review of every redaction with the presumption that the
information that has been redacted should be disclosed, consistent with the
MOUs basic objective of maximizing disclosure and transparency.
(b) Second, we ask ourselves whether the presumption is rebutted because
disclosure would compromise national security, national defence or
international relations.
(c) Third, if the presumption is rebutted, we assess whether the redacted
information can be summarized for disclosure purposes without compromising
national security, national defence or international relations. Only if it cannot
does the information remain undisclosed.
29. We have found that the NSC redactions referred to us by the Committee tend to fall
within the following categories: (1) detainee information, (2) confidential communications
with foreign officials and organizations, (3) criticism of foreign (primarily Afghan)
institutions and officials, (4) information about or from the International Committee of the
Red Cross (ICRC), (5) third party information, (6) names of Afghan officials, (7)
information relating to Canadas Special Forces, and (8) information about gun shot residue
testing. We set out below the approaches that we have developed for each of these categories.
We have done our best to apply these approaches consistently. However, as we found in
- 11 -
reviewing redactions made by government officials, this is very much a human process, and it
is inevitable that there will be some inconsistencies despite the best-intentioned efforts to
avoid them.
Detainee Information
30. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain information about detainees
captured and in most cases transferred by Canadian Forces. The information contained in
these documents includes the exact date of capture and/or transfer; the location of capture; the
number of detainees captured or involved in a particular incident; the gender, age, name,
nationality, tribe and date of birth of detainees captured or involved in a particular incident;
and the identity of the country or entity to which certain detainees were transferred.
31. Our approach with these documents is to disclose only information that will not, either
by itself or in conjunction with other information, reveal the identity of, or permit
identification of, detainees. We have adopted this approach in large part because we accept
the concern expressed to us by government officials that detainees and their families face a
real and continuing threat from enemy forces of retaliation and serious physical harm. Our
approach is to disclose the following information: the month and year of capture, transfer, or
release, but not the date or time; an approximation of the number of detainees captured,
transferred or released in a particular operation (e.g., fewer than 20), but not the exact
number; and general information about physical condition, but not information about specific
ailments or diagnoses. We leave redacted information disclosing gender; age (unless the
detainee is under the age of 18, in which case we will disclose that the detainee is a minor
(as defined by the Convention on the Rights of the Child
14
)); name (including fathers name
and grandfathers name); identification number; nationality; place of capture; and tribe/region.
32. Certain of the documents referred to us by the Committee contain redactions that refer
to the length of delay between the transfer and the request for notification to the ICRC. We
discuss the ICRC and its role in Afghanistan below. Government officials have advised us
that, in some cases, the release of this information could lead a reader to determine the precise

14
Can. T.S. 1992 No. 3.
- 12 -
date of capture, and thereby gain insight into the pace of Canadian Forces operations. To
avoid the compromise of national defence that this would entail, we have substituted the exact
length of delay with an approximation.
Confidential Communications with Foreign Officials and Organizations
33. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain information about the substance
of communications between Canadian officials and officials from foreign governments
(primarily Afghanistan) or national/international organizations, such as the ICRC and the
Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC). We have addressed
communications with the ICRC as a separate category, below. Also addressed below as a
separate category are diplomatic communications that amount to criticism by Canada of
Afghan institutions or officials.
34. Government officials expressed serious concern about the disclosure of
intergovernmental communications. They told us that all diplomatic communication is
undertaken with the expectation of confidentiality, and that disclosure of confidential
communications would cause serious harm, regardless of the substance of the communication,
and whether the speaker is Canada or a foreign government. They emphasized that the
chilling effect of disclosure of confidential intergovernmental communications cannot be
underestimated. They also emphasized that even in circumstances in which some
communications have been disclosed, further disclosures would cause incremental harm. The
government officials also raised a specific concern about the substance of demarches, which
are official diplomatic communications, often intended to be and regarded by the recipient as
very serious. Government officials told us that their ability to effectively deliver these
demarches, and the willingness of foreign officials to respond candidly and usefully, depends
on confidentiality.
35. Bearing in mind the governments concerns, but also the primary objective under the
MOU of disclosure and transparency, our approach is generally to summarize these
communications, using wording appropriate to the context to avoid comprising national
security, national defence or international relations. There are instances in which information
can be or has been publicly disclosed in a certain context (e.g., as a statement of Canadas
- 13 -
position on an issue), but we have summarized the same or similar information when it
appears in a formal or informal diplomatic communication. This is because the concern about
disclosure generally relates to the fact that the communications are diplomatic
communications, and to preserving the trust and confidentiality inherent in those
communications, more than to the substance of the communications, save for certain cases.
However, where information has been disclosed in another document in a similar context, we
have disclosed it.
36. With respect to these and other categories of documents, our staff have, to the extent
possible and feasible, carried out regular reviews of credible media reporting, government
reports and reports of international organizations to assess whether the redacted information is
in the public domain. If it is, we have generally disclosed it.
Criticism of Foreign (primarily Afghan) Institutions and Officials
37. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain Canadian criticism of, or candid
negative commentary about, Afghan institutions or officials. Some documents also contain
Canadian reporting about criticism by one Afghan institution or official of another. The main
concern with releasing this information is that doing so could undermine Canadas
relationship with officials in the government and justice sector. This could in turn impair
Canadas ability to continue to train and build the capacity of these officials and their
institutions and jeopardize the reforms that Canada has been able to achieve to date.
38. Taking into account these concerns, and considering the different types of documents
referred to us, we have adopted the following approach to documents containing candid
criticisms and assessments by Canada, based on our assessment of the extent to which
disclosure of the redacted information would compromise national security, national defence
or international relations.
(a) If the assessment can fairly be attributed to Canada, the Canadian government,
a department of the government, or a very senior official of the government,
we generally summarize it. The level of detail in each summary will depend on
how specific and how critical the assessment is, and who is the object of the
criticism, and what adverse impact might therefore flow from disclosure.
- 14 -
(b) If the assessment appears to be merely speculation by a non-senior Canadian
official, we generally either leave it redacted or summarize it at a very high
level, making it clear in doing so that the assessment is the view of the
individual, and not the government of Canada.
(c) If it is in the public domain (in media reporting for example) that Canada or
Canadian officials hold a particular view or have arrived at a particular
assessment, we generally disclose that view or assessment. If the assessment or
view simply appears in media reporting, but without any indication that it is
Canadas view or assessment, we generally summarize rather than disclose it.
39. Where we encounter criticism originating not from Canada but from a foreign
government or institution, we take a slightly different approach, on the basis that criticism of
one foreign institution by another, while it might be relevant and important, is not Canadas
information to disclose. This rationale flows from the third party rule, which, as described
above, provides that intelligence and information received from a foreign government, as well
as the source of that intelligence or information, should not be disclosed without permission.
If the source of the criticism is revealed by name or position, we generally leave the criticism
redacted. If the source of the criticism is not disclosed (even if the originating institution is
disclosed), we generally provide a high-level summary of that criticism.
40. We exercise our judgment in each case to decide whether the information at issue is
truly critical, and therefore would be harmful if released. We are less concerned about
disclosing information that is not obviously critical, and more concerned about disclosing
information that is highly critical or expressed in very inflammatory language. The object of
the criticism and the specificity with which it is expressed are also taken into account.
41. Finally, we note that one type of commentary that arises frequently in the documents
is Canadian assessments about mistreatment and/or torture in certain Afghan facilities. In
view of the importance of the issue of mistreatment, our general approach, depending on the
language used, is to release, rather than summarize, these assessments.
- 15 -
Information about or from the ICRC
42. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain information about or from the
ICRC. Information relating to the ICRC falls within a unique category to which we have
given careful consideration. In addition to obtaining briefings from government officials
about ICRC information, our staff discussed the ICRCs role and its concerns respecting the
confidentiality of its information directly with ICRC officials.
43. The ICRC is an independent, neutral and impartial humanitarian organization
headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. The ICRC has described its role in Afghanistan as
including protecting detainees, helping them to maintain contact with their families,
monitoring the conduct of hostilities and acts to prevent international human rights law
violations and assisting the wounded and disabled.
15
44. The ICRCs mandate is expressly provided for in the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the
1977 Additional Protocols to the Conventions, as well as its Statutes, those of the
International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and the resolutions of the International
Conferences of the Red Cross and Red Crescent. The ICRC operates in approximately 80
countries and deploys over 12,000 staff worldwide. In order to carry out its work in a neutral
and impartial manner, it has a long-standing policy and practice of confidentiality. The ICRC
requires confidential bilateral communications with the authorities with which it deals and
expects such authorities to respect and protect the confidential nature of its communications.
The confidential nature of the ICRCs communications is essential, among other things, to
enable the ICRC to conduct a dialogue with states or organized armed groups involved in
armed conflicts, to persuade the parties to an armed conflict to allow it to exercise its right of
access to conflict areas, and to protect ICRC staff in the field.
45. The unique role of the ICRC and the confidentiality of its working methods have been
recognized by international tribunals. The ICRCs claim to confidentiality was initially upheld
in a decision of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia involving a
case in which the Prosecutor intended to call a former ICRC employee to testify. The Tribunal

15
The ICRC in Afghanistan, online at http://www.icrc.org/eng/where-we-work/asia-pacific/afghanistan/
index.jsp.
- 16 -
determined that the ICRC has an absolute privilege to decline to provide evidence in
connection with judicial proceedings as a matter of both international treaty and customary
law.
16
This decision has been followed by the Appeals Chambers of the International Criminal
Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, as well as the International Criminal Tribunal for
Rwanda.
17
The privilege over ICRC communications has also been incorporated into the
Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court.
18
46. Mindful of the ICRCs concerns, considering its important mandate and taking into
account our staffs discussions with ICRC officials, we have adopted the following approach
to reviewing redactions respecting information about or from the ICRC.
(a) We disclose the fact of any discussions or meetings with the ICRC. The ICRC
advised our staff that it is publicly known and expected, by virtue of the
ICRCs mandate under the Geneva Convention, that the ICRC meets with state
authorities to remind them of their international obligations.
(b) Generally speaking, we do not disclose any information or communications
flowing from Canada to the ICRC. There may be instances is which we
disclose in summary form information communicated by Canada to the ICRC
on issues that are peripheral to the detainee issue.
(c) We do not disclose any information, even in summary form, about or from the
ICRC that is directly attributed to the ICRC or that it can be inferred comes
from the ICRC, unless it has already been publicly disclosed. We may disclose
the substance of information, likely by way of summary, communicated by the
ICRC, where it is not attributed to the ICRC directly and it is not otherwise
apparent that it comes from the ICRC. Given the ICRCs role and privileged
access to information about detainees, it will be obvious in many cases, even

16
Prosecutor v. Simic, Case No. IT-95-9, Decision on the Prosecution Motion Under Rule 73 for a Ruling
Concerning the Testimony of a Witness, 27 July 1999.
17
Prosecutor v. Brdjanin, Appeals Chamber, Case No. IT-99-36, Decision on Interlocutory Appeals, 11
December 2002, para. 32; Prosecutor v. Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-2000-55, Reasons for the Chambers Decision
on the Accuseds Motion to Exclude Witness TQ, 15 July 2005, paras. 14-16.
18
Rule 73, Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court.
- 17 -
where information is not attributed to the ICRC, that the ICRC is the source of
this information. Where that is the case, we leave the information redacted.
47. This approach applies to all information flowing between Canada and the ICRC,
whether it is information about or assessments of Canadian procedures or information about
or assessments of Afghan facilities and national authorities. From the ICRCs perspective
there is no basis on which to distinguish these types of information.
Third party Information
48. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain information from third parties,
such as foreign governments or intergovernmental organizations like NATO or NATOs
International Security Assistance Force. In accordance with the third party information rule,
described in paragraph 24 above, our approach is to not disclose or summarize third party
information, unless it has already been publicly disclosed.
Names of Afghan Officials
49. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain the names of Afghan officials,
including senior Afghan officials. Our approach is not to disclose these names except where
the information, including the name, has already been widely disclosed. As is the case with
the names of Afghan detainees, there are in many cases serious risks that an Afghan official
referred to in the documents may be subject to retaliation or serious harm if the Afghan
officials name is identified. In addition, there are risks that disclosure will compromise
Canadas relationship with the Afghan government. We have summarized information where
it can be summarized without identifying the Afghan official involved.
Information relating to Special Forces
50. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain information about Canadas
Special Forces in Afghanistan. In view of the nature of their mission, information about the
activities of Special Forces is not ordinarily publicly available. Recognizing the operational
security issues involved, our approach is not to disclose or summarize information about
Special Forces activities except where it has already been disclosed. The information that
- 18 -
appears to have been publicly disclosed includes the following: (a) the presence of Special
Forces in Afghanistan; and (b) the general nature of the role of Special Forces in Afghanistan.
Information about Gun Shot Residue Testing
51. Certain documents referred by the Committee contain information about the use of
gunshot residue (GSR) testing in Afghanistan. The government has publicly acknowledged
that the GSR test is used by Canadian Forces. Our approach is to disclose information in
documents relating to the use of the test and results obtained in particular circumstances, but
leave redacted other information to avoid compromising national defence.
D. Status of the Panels Review of NSC Information
52. As a result of its review of the documents it has received from the government, the
Committee, has referred approximately 2300 pages of documents to the Panel for its
consideration. In some instances the Committee has referred entire documents to the Panel; in
other instances only particular pages, paragraphs or passages have been referred.
53. In October 2010, to facilitate the Panels work and enable it to begin to release the
results of its NSC determinations without waiting until it had completed its review of all of
the documents referred to it, the Panel invited the Committee to identify documents from
among those referred to it that the Panel would review on a priority basis. The Committee
initially identified a priority subset of documents in October 2010, supplemented its list of
these documents in mid-December 2010, and further refined the list in March 2011. The
subset comprises some 1450 pages of documents.
54. The Panel has completed its review and determinations in respect of the priority subset
of documents identified by the Committee, and also reviewed and made determinations with
respect to a number of documents on the longer list of documents referred by the Committee
to the Panel. Where only a portion of a document has been referred to the Panel, the Panels
determinations relate only to redactions that appeared in the referred portion of the document;
again, we have not dealt with any redactions in portions of the document that were not
referred to us.
- 19 -
55. A long and complex process must be completed in order to implement the Panels
decisions. This implementation work is carried out by a specialized unit within the
Department of Justice, which has the technology and resources to carry out these tasks, using
special secure software so that redactions can be lifted or the information in them
summarized in a form that is useful for the purposes of disclosure but that does not
compromise national security, national defence or international relations. Once the Panels
decisions have been implemented, the documents are given to us and our staff for a final
review before they are ready for release. The process is painstaking and time-consuming,
though that is a necessary corollary of the sensitive and confidential nature of the task.
56. As a result of the need to undertake this process, while the Panel has completed its
review of the priority subset of documents, those documents are not all yet ready for release.
However, at the Committees suggestion, we have further prioritized 113 of these documents.
They comprise the first set of documents that we have reviewed in accordance with our
mandate under the MOU and that are ready for release. A set of these 113 documents,
reflecting the results of our review, is available for provision along with this report. The table
of contents of this set of documents specifies the portions of the documents referred to us by
the Committee. We had contemplated that we would continue to deliver further sets of
documents to the Committee as they became ready for release.
IV. PANELS APPROACH AND WORK IN REVIEWING INFORMATION
SUBJECT TO CLAIMS OF SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND
CABINET CONFIDENTIALITY
A. Introduction
57. The Panels second task under the MOU is to review the governments redactions on
grounds of solicitor-client privilege and Cabinet confidentiality. This is the process described
in paragraph 7 of the MOU. In contrast to the NSC process, the Committee has no ability to
refer redactions of these classes of information to the Panel. Indeed, in contrast to NSC
redactions, the Committee does not see redacted information that is subject to these claims
unless the Panel decides to lift the redactions or summarize the redacted information.
58. The MOU includes among its recitals the following statement:
- 20 -
Recognizing that Cabinet confidences and information subject
to solicitor-client privilege are classes of information that the
Parliament of Canada has long recognized are sensitive and may
require protection from disclosure.
59. As set out above, paragraph 7 of the MOU states:
The Panel of Arbiters can determine, at the request of the
government, that certain information should not be disclosed
due to the solicitor-client privilege. The Panel of Arbiters, after
consultation with the Clerk of the Privy Council, can also
determine, at the request of the government, that information
constituting Cabinet confidences should not be disclosed. In
both such cases, the Panel of Arbiters shall determine how
information contained in the documents may be made to
Members of Parliament and the public without compromising
the solicitor-client privilege or the principle of Cabinet
confidentiality, by such techniques as the Panel may find
appropriate, bearing in mind the basic objective of maximizing
disclosure and transparency. Should the Panel of Arbiters
decide that certain information should not be disclosed, the
Panel will provide the rationale for its decisions to the ad hoc
committee.
60. In carrying out its tasks under paragraph 7 of the MOU, the Panels approach is to
apply the law of solicitor-client privilege and Cabinet confidentiality, keeping in mind the
basic objective of maximizing disclosure and transparency to which the paragraph refers. Our
methodology entails (1) applying legal requirements to determine whether the claim of
privilege or confidentiality is validly made, (2) if it is, determining whether the information
subject to the claim can be made available in summary form without compromising the
privilege or confidentiality, (3) if this is possible, determining an appropriate summary, and
(4) if this is not possible, maintaining the redaction.
B. Solicitor-Client Privilege
Legal Requirements
61. Under Canadian law, solicitor-client privilege is close to absolute. Courts in Canada
have held that solicitor-client privilege is a substantive legal and constitutional right that is
- 21 -
fundamental to the proper functioning of our legal system.
19
It applies broadly to all
interactions between client and lawyer when the lawyer is engaged in providing legal advice
or otherwise acting as a lawyer rather than as a business counsellor or in some other non-legal
capacity. It extends to communications between government officials and government
lawyers just as it does to any other lawyer-client communications.
20
62. There are four basic prerequisites for solicitor-client privilege to apply: (1) there must
be a communication between the lawyer and client; (2) the communication must be for the
purpose of giving or receiving legal advice; (3) the communication must have been made in
confidence with an expectation of confidentiality; and (4) the communication must be based
on the lawyers professional legal expertise. Unless it is waived by the client, solicitor-client
privilege generally lasts forever.
21
Status of the Panels Review of Solicitor-Client Privilege Claims
63. The Panel has completed its review of the majority of the redactions from documents
provided to the Committee to date that are based on claims of solicitor-client privilege. As
part of this review, the Panel instructed its staff to seek further information from government
officials so that it could be satisfied of the basis for the claims. In the course of this process a
number of claims of privilege were withdrawn, in whole or in part.
64. Applying the relevant law, the Panel determined that with limited exceptions, the
claims of solicitor-client privilege were well founded: the large majority of the claims met the
four prerequisites for privilege set out above.
65. In cases in which we determined that these prerequisites were met, so that the claim of
solicitor-client privilege is properly made, we considered, in accordance with our mandate in
the MOU and our methodology, whether summaries of the redacted passages or at a
minimum the facts which they contain could be provided without compromising the
solicitor-client privilege. In our judgment this has not been possible. First, to do so would

19
Descteaux v. Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 860.
20
Pritchard v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission) (2003), 63 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.).
21
Blank v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 319.
- 22 -
disclose the subject matter of a request for legal advice, and thus compromise the privilege.
Second, to do so would be inconsistent with the rejection by the Supreme Court of Canada of
a distinction, in determining whether privilege is made out, between legal advice and an
account of the underlying facts.
22
Both are presumptively protected by privilege.
66. We have prepared for transmission to the Committee along with this report a list
setting out (1) the documents in relation to which claims of solicitor-client privilege have
been withdrawn, in whole or in part, (2) the documents that are the subject of claims of
solicitor-client privilege that the Panel has determined to be well-founded, and (3) the
documents that are the subject of claims of solicitor-client privilege that the Panel has
determined not to be well-founded.
67. We have also arranged for transmission to the Committee along with this report fresh
copies of the documents that were the subject of solicitor-client privilege claims that have
been withdrawn or have been determined by the Panel not to be well-founded. In these
versions of the documents the redactions made on the basis of these claims have been lifted.
C. Cabinet Confidentiality
Legal Requirements
68. In contrast to the law of solicitor-client privilege, the common law respecting Cabinet
confidences, which applies to the documents reviewed by the Panel under the MOU, does not
provide for an absolute privilege from disclosure. The Supreme Court of Canada has held
instead that, as a matter of common law, Cabinet confidences should be disclosed, unless
disclosure would interfere with the public interest.
23
However, the Court stated that because
Cabinet documents can concern the decision-making process at the highest level, courts must
proceed with caution in ordering their disclosure.
69. The Court set out a number of considerations that are relevant in determining whether
disclosure would interfere with the public interest. These include the level of decision-making
to which the information relates; the nature of the policy concerned (e.g., documents relating

22
Maranda v. Qubec (Juge de la Cour du Qubec), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 193.
23
Carey v. Ontario, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 637.
- 23 -
to national security or national defence might be treated differently than documents relating to
tourism policy); the particular contents of the documents; whether the information relates to
allegations of government wrong-doing, so that disclosure may be necessary to ensure the
proper functioning of government; the date of the documents or information and whether the
policy-making process to which it relates is still ongoing; and the importance of producing the
documents in the interests of the administration of justice, having regard to the importance of
the case and the need or desirability of producing the documents to ensure that it can be
adequately and fairly presented. Cabinet confidentiality may extend beyond Cabinet
documents per se; it may, for example, apply to communications between or involving
Ministers.
70. The common law of Cabinet confidentiality has been largely superseded at the federal
level by section 39 of the Canada Evidence Act, which creates an absolute bar to disclosure
where Cabinet confidentiality is properly claimed under that section. However, section 39
applies only where the issue of disclosure arises before a court, person or body with
jurisdiction to compel the production of information. Because the Panel does not meet this
description, section 39 is inapplicable to the determinations the Panel must make as to
whether Cabinet confidences should be disclosed.
Status of the Panels Review of Cabinet Confidentiality Claims
71. The government provided the Panel only recently with its claims of Cabinet
confidences in relation to the documents provided by the government to date. The Panels
intent has been to complete its review of the redactions based on these claims as expeditiously
as possible.
EXAMEN DES DOCUMENTS SUR LES DTENUS AFGHANS
RAPPORT DU GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
RELATIVEMENT SON TRAVAILET SAMTHODOLOGIE
AFIN DE DTERMINER
QUELS RENSEIGNEMENTS CAVIARDS PEUVENT TRE DIVULGUS
Lhonorable Claire LHeureux-Dub
Lhonorable Frank Iacobucci
Le 15 avril 2011
TABLE DES MATIRES
PRFACE............................................................................................................................ I
I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
II. LES TCHES CONFIES AU GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES ...................3
III. APPROCHE ADOPTE PAR LE GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
LGARD DES CAVIARDAGES VISS PAR LE PROCESSUS CSN.................6
A. Introduction.......................................................................................................6
B. Jurisprudence pertinente....................................................................................7
C. Approche applique par le Groupe dexperts-arbitres lexamen des
caviardages viss par le processus CSN........................................................10
Approche gnrale ..........................................................................................10
Renseignements sur les dtenus.......................................................................11
Communications confidentielles avec des reprsentants et des
organisations de ltranger .............................................................12
Critiques lgard dinstitutions et de reprsentants de ltranger (surtout
de lAfghanistan) ...........................................................................14
Renseignements au sujet ou en provenance du CICR.......................................15
Renseignement provenant de tiers ...................................................................18
Noms de reprsentants de lAfghanistan..........................................................18
Renseignements sur les forces spciales du Canada.........................................18
Renseignements sur les analyses des rsidus de poudre canon ......................19
D. tat de lexamen des caviardages viss par le processus CSN..........................19
IV. APPROCHE ADOPTE PAR LE GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
LGARD DES RENSEIGNEMENTS ASSUJETTIS AU SECRET
PROFESSIONNEL ET DES RENSEIGNEMENTS CONFIDENTIELS DU
CABINET................................................................................................................20
A. Introduction.....................................................................................................20
B. Secret professionnel avocat-client ...................................................................21
Exigences juridiques .......................................................................................21
tat de lexamen des renseignements assujettis au secret professionnel ...........22
C. Renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet........................................................23
Exigences juridiques .......................................................................................23
tat de lexamen des renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet ........................25
- i -
PRFACE
Cest le cur lourd que nous crivons ces mots en hommage notre collgue du Groupe
dexperts-arbitres, lhonorable Donald I. Brenner, ex-juge en chef de la Cour suprme de
Colombie-Britannique. minent avocat, juriste et rformateur, Don a fait une contribution
norme aux travaux relatifs au protocole dentente. Deux jours encore avant sa disparition
subite, Don et nous avons pass la journe ensemble et avons fait de grands progrs,
notamment grce aux observations perspicaces dont il avait lhabitude et son esprit de
collaboration.
Bien que, malheureusement, Don ne soit plus auprs de nous, nous sommes en mesure
daffirmer que le prsent rapport reflte ses vues, et nous lui en sommes grandement
reconnaissants. Nous offrons sa famille nos profondes condolances.
I. INTRODUCTION
1. Le 15 juin 2010, le trs honorable Stephen Harper, Premier ministre, lhonorable
Michael Ignatieff, chef de lOpposition officielle, et M. Gilles Duceppe, chef du Bloc
Qubcois, ont conclu un protocole dentente (le protocole ) visant rsoudre un diffrend
relativement la divulgation de documents gouvernementaux propos du transfert des
dtenus afghans par les Forces canadiennes aux autorits afghanes.
2. Le protocole, dont copie est en annexe au prsent rapport, prvoit la cration dun
comit spcial de parlementaires, compos dun dput et dun dput remplaant de chacun
des partis dont les chefs ont sign le protocole, et dun Groupe de trois experts-arbitres,
compos de trois juristes minents qui auront lexpertise judiciaire . Ce comit spcial a
pour tche dexaminer tous les renseignements caviards par le gouvernement pour des
raisons de scurit nationale, de dfense nationale et de relations internationales, et, sil
estime que la divulgation de cette information est pertinente et ncessaire, dans le but
dobliger le gouvernement rendre compte, de renvoyer celle-ci au Groupe dexperts-arbitres.
Conformment au protocole, ce dernier a t charg de dterminer la faon dont pourraient
tre communiqus ces renseignements caviards aux dputs et au public sans compromettre
les intrts que protge le caviardage.
3. Lhonorable Stphane Dion, M. Luc Desnoyers, M. Laurie Hawn, M. Pierre Lemieux,
M. Richard Nadeau et lhonorable Bryon Wilfert ont t nomms membres du comit spcial.
Nous deux, ainsi que lhonorable Donald I. Brenner, avons t nomms membres du Groupe
dexperts-arbitres. Depuis notre nomination, avec laide de notre personnel de soutien, nous
avons travaill conjointement avec le comit, le Bureau du Conseil priv et le ministre de la
Justice lexcution des tches qui nous ont t confies en vertu du protocole.
4. Lhonorable Donald Brenner est malheureusement dcd subitement le 12 mars
2011. Avant son dcs, il a contribu de faon marquante l approche adopte par le Groupe
dexperts-arbitres et la rdaction du prsent rapport; jusqu sa disparition tragique, il a
particip pleinement aux dcisions du Groupe.
5. Le but de ce rapport est dexpliquer la mthode que nous avons suivie pour effectuer
les tches confres par le protocole dentente, et plus particulirement la mthodologie qui
- 2 -
nous a servis dterminer si linformation caviarde que nous renvoie le comit spcial peut
tre divulgue, et dans laffirmative, de quelle faon elle doit ltre. Le rapport explicite :
(a) les tches qui nous ont t confies aux termes du protocole, leur relation avec
le travail ralis par le comit et des reprsentants du gouvernement, et la
mthode utilise;
(b) la mthodologie applique notre examen du caviardage effectu par le
gouvernement pour des raisons de scurit nationale, de dfense nationale ou
de relations internationales;
(c) la mthodologie applique notre examen du caviardage effectu par le
gouvernement eu gard au secret professionnel avocat-client et la
confidentialit des renseignements du Cabinet;
(d) ltat de nos travaux.
6. De pair avec le prsent rapport, nous avions prvu remettre au comit la premire srie
de documents que nous avons examins conformment notre mandat aux termes du
protocole et qui sont prts tre divulgus. Nous avions lintention de continuer remettre
des documents au Comit au fur et mesure que nous en aurions complt lexamen et quils
seraient prts tre divulgs.
7. Comme en sont conscients les membres du comit et les reprsentants du
gouvernement impliqus dans le processus dexamen des documents, un mcanisme comme
celui prvu dans le protocole na jamais t adopt au Canada, ni mme peut-tre au monde.
Afin de nous acquitter de cette tche complexe, nous avons d porter des jugements difficiles.
Ce faisant, nous avons gard lesprit la grande importance des intrts en jeu. Nous avons
aussi pris en considration et soupes divers facteurs, circonstances et consquences
potentielles. Bien que nous reconnaissions le possibilit que des dcideurs clairs puissent
diverger dopinion sur ces jugements, nous pouvons toutefois affirmer que le contenu de notre
rapport et de nos dcisions tmoigne de notre effort collectif, las suite de discussions et
dvaluations attentives, pour dgager des conclusions qui, selon nous, sont fidles tant la
lettre qu lesprit du protocole.
- 3 -
8. Nous sommes reconnaissants aux membres du comit et aux reprsentants du
gouvernement pour leur assistance et coopration dans le traitement de ces questions et de la
rsolution de cette nouvelle problmatique. Nos discussions avec les membres du comit ont
t constructives et professionnelles, et ces derniers ont assum leur rle de faon
consciencieuse et motive.
9. Enfin, nous souhaitons souligner l apports continu de notre personnel, qui, dune part,
nous a fourni linformation, les analyses et le soutien ncessaires nos prises de dcision, et
dautre part, ont consacr beaucoup defforts et de temps la mise en uvre de ces dcisions,
comme nous le dcrivons ci-dessous. Leur contribution et leur travail infatigable nous ont t
dune aide prcieuse.
II. LES TCHES CONFIES AU GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
10. Le travail du Groupe dexperts-arbitres, tout comme celui du comit et du
gouvernement en ce qui concerne ce processus, est dtermin par les termes du protocole
dentente, conclu afin de rsoudre un diffrend entre la Chambre des communes et le
gouvernement.
11. Le 10 dcembre 2009, la Chambre des communes a adopt une ordonnance de
production de documents gouvernementaux propos du transfert par les Forces canadiennes
des dtenus afghans aux autorits afghanes. Or, comme les signataires du protocole lont
reconnu, la divulgation de certains renseignements contenus dans ces documents pourrait
porter prjudice la dfense nationale, aux relations internationales ou la scurit, tant
donn quaucune mesure de traitement confidentiel de linformation nest prvue dans cette
ordonnance.
12. Le 27 avril 2010, le prsident de la Chambre des communes a conclu que la Chambre
navait pas outrepass ses pouvoirs en requrant les documents viss dans lordonnance en
question. Le prsident a toutefois suggr linstauration dun mcanisme par lequel ces
documents pourraient tre mis la disposition de la Chambre sans compromettre la scurit et
la confidentialit des renseignements quils contiennent. Conformment cette suggestion du
prsident, tous les partis ont convenu dans un accord de principe, le 14 mai 2010, dtablir ce
- 4 -
mcanisme. Le protocole dentente, qui met en uvre laccord de principe, a subsquemment
t ratifi par le chef de tous les partis, sauf le Nouveau Parti dmocratique.
13. Le protocole dentente a cr le comit et le Groupe dexperts-arbitres. Il accorde au
comit laccs tous les documents en version caviarde et non caviarde figurant
lordonnance du 10 dcembre 2009, y compris tous les documents pertinents concernant le
transfert des dtenus afghans de 2001 2005, pour la bonne comprhension des ententes de
transfert conclues aprs 2005, selon de strictes mesures de scurit, de dfense nationale ou de
relations internationales. Deux processus distincts dexamen des caviardages effectus par le
gouvernement sont prvus dans le protocole :
(a) CSN ce processus sapplique aux documents contenant de linformation
caviarde par le gouvernement dans lintrt de la confidentialit lie la
scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou aux relations internationales
(rsumes par lacronyme CSN );
(b) secret professionnel/principe de confidentialit un autre processus sapplique
aux documents contenant de linformation caviarde par le gouvernement en
raison du secret professionnel avocat-client ou du principe de confidentialit
du Cabinet.
14. Les paragraphes 5 et 6 du protocole dfinissent le processus dexamen des passages
qui ont t caviards pour des motifs de scurit nationale, de dfense nationale ou de
relations internationales. Le processus prvoit que le comit doit dterminer quels sont les
renseignements pertinents devant tre divulgus, tandis que le Groupe dexperts-arbitres doit
dterminer la faon dont ces renseignements seront communiqus sans compromettre la
scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou les relations internationales.
15. Le paragraphe 5 se lit comme suit :
Le comit spcial dterminera si linformation dans chaque document ayant t
caviard est pertinente, eut (sic) gard aux sujets dimportance pour les
dputs, en particulier si elle concerne ltude sur le transfert des dtenus
afghans actuellement mene par le Comit spcial de la Chambre des
communes sur la mission canadienne en Afghanistan, et si lutilisation de cette
information est ncessaire dans le but de demander des comptes au
- 5 -
gouvernement. Les dcisions du comit spcial concernant la pertinence seront
dfinitives et chapperont au contrle judiciaire.
16. Le paragraphe 6 se lit comme suit :
Si le comit spcial estime que linformation est pertinente et ncessaire, ou
la demande dun membre du comit spcial, il renverra celle-ci au Groupe
dexperts-arbitres qui dterminera la faon dont seront communiqus ces
renseignements aux dputs et au public, sans compromettre la scurit
nationale, la dfense nationale ou les relations internationales, que ce soit la
censure, la rdaction de rsums ou toute autre technique juge approprie,
compte tenu des objectifs fondamentaux visant maximiser la divulgation et la
transparence. Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres consultera rgulirement les
membres du comit spcial afin de mieux comprendre quels renseignements
les dputs estiment pertinents et leurs justifications. Les dcisions du Groupe
concernant la divulgation seront dfinitives et chapperont au contrle
judiciaire.
17. Comme le dmontrent les termes de ces paragraphes, le protocole confre au comit la
seule responsabilit de dterminer quels renseignements caviards pour des motifs de scurit
nationale, de dfense nationale ou de relations internationales sont pertinents et dont la
divulgation est ncessaire. Il confre au Groupe dexperts-arbitres la seule responsabilit de
dterminer la faon dont seront divulgus ces renseignements sans compromettre la scurit
nationale, la dfense nationale ou les relations internationales. Au paragraphe 6, on peut lire
que le Groupe dexperts-arbitres doit consulter rgulirement les membres du comit afin de
mieux comprendre quels renseignements les dputs estiment pertinents, et pourquoi.
Toutefois, en ce qui a trait la divulgation, le Groupe dexperts-arbitres prend les dcisions
finales de faon indpendante, sans lintervention du comit ou du gouvernement.
18. Le paragraphe 7 du protocole dfinit le processus dexamen des renseignements qui,
selon le gouvernement, ne devraient pas tre divulgus en raison du secret professionnel
avocat-client ou du principe de confidentialit du Cabinet. Le paragraphe se lit comme suit :
Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres peut dterminer, la demande du gouvernement,
que certains renseignements ne devraient pas tre divulgus en raison du secret
professionnel qui lie lavocat son client. Aprs avoir consult le greffier du
Conseil priv, le Groupe dexperts-arbitres peut galement dterminer, la
demande du gouvernement, que linformation qui constitue des renseignements
confidentiels du Cabinet ne devrait pas tre divulgue. Dans les deux cas, le
Groupe dexperts-arbitres peut dterminer comment communiquer aux
- 6 -
membres du Parlement et au public, laide des moyens quil juge opportuns,
linformation contenue dans les documents sans compromettre le secret
professionnel avocat-client, ni le principe de confidentialit du Cabinet et sans
perdre de vue que lobjectif est davoir la plus grande divulgation et la plus
grande transparence possibles. Si le Groupe dexperts-arbitres est davis que
certains renseignements ne devraient pas tre divulgus, le Groupe dexperts-
arbitres fournira les raisons de sa dcision au comit spcial.
III. APPROCHE ADOPTE PAR LE GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
LGARD DES CAVIARDAGES VISS PAR LE PROCESSUS CSN
A. Introduction
19. Conformment au protocole dentente, la principale fonction du Groupe
dexperts-arbitres est dexaminer les caviardages viss par le processus CSN, cest--dire les
renseignements caviards par le gouvernement dans lintrt de la scurit nationale, de la
dfense nationale ou des relations internationales. Cette activit sest avre complexe et
charge de dfis : il y avait des milliers de pages de documents examiner, de nombreuses
runions entre le Groupe dexperts-arbitres, son personnel et le comit organiser, ainsi que
des rencontres et des communications avec les reprsentants du gouvernement coordonner.
Lune des grandes difficults relevait des facteurs lis la technologie et la scurit dont le
Groupe devait tenir compte dans lexamen des documents et leur prparation en vue de leur
divulgation. Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres et son personnel devaient tout dabord examiner et
valuer tous les caviardages ports son attention par le comit, puis voir lapplication de
ses dcisions en faisant traiter chaque document au moyen dun logiciel permettant de
supprimer les caviardages jugs inutiles, ou encore en rsumant linformation de manire ce
quelle puisse tre divulgue sans compromette la scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou
les relations internationales.
20. Dans le cadre de son examen des caviardages viss par le processus CSN, le Groupe
dexperts-arbitres a tudi la jurisprudence des tribunaux afin de dterminer si, en conformit
avec larticle 38 de Loi sur la preuve au Canada
1
, certains des renseignements ne devraient
pas tre divulgus parce quils pourraient porter prjudice la dfense nationale, la scurit
nationale ou aux relations internationales. Mme si la Loi ne sapplique pas au travail du

1
Lois rvises du Canada 1985, chapitre C-5
- 7 -
Groupe dexperts-arbitres, et que le libell de larticle 38 diffre grandement de celui du
protocole dentente, le Groupe sest nanmoins appuy sur la jurisprudence labore sous
larticle 38 pour dfinir son approche lexamen des documents viss par le processus CSN.
Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a galement bnfici de sances dinformation lors desquelles
des reprsentants du gouvernement lui ont expliqu comment et pourquoi, leur avis, la
divulgation des renseignements caviards compromettrait la scurit nationale, la dfense
nationale ou les relations internationales.
B. Jurisprudence pertinente
21. Dans un arrt-cl, il a t tabli que la "scurit nationale" sentend au minimum de
la prservation du mode de vie canadien, notamment de la protection de la scurit des
personnes, des institutions et des liberts au Canada
2
. Les tribunaux ont dtermin quels
types de renseignements sont susceptibles de porter prjudice la scurit nationale, soit ceux
qui : rvlent ou tendent rvler lidentit de sources humaines ou techniques; rvlent ou
tendent rvler des cibles de surveillance; rvlent ou tendent rvler des mthodes de
fonctionnement ou des politiques oprationnelles ou administratives; compromettent ou
tendent compromettre la scurit des systmes de tlcommunication
3
.
22. Dans le mme arrt, on dfinit la notion de dfense nationale au moyen dune
traduction libre de la dfinition donne dans le Blacks Law Dictionary : 1. Tous les moyens
pris par une nation pour se protger contre ses ennemis. La protection, par une nation, de son
idal collectif et de ses valeurs collectives est comprise dans la notion de dfense nationale.
2. Larsenal militaire dune nation
4
. Dans une autre affaire, le juge a conclu que la
divulgation dune vido et de transcriptions relatives au conflit en Bosnie porterait prjudice
la dfense nationale et aux relations internationales. La vido montrait un bombardement
arien effectu en Bosnie par les forces diriges par lOrganisation du trait de lAtlantique

2
Canada (Procureur gnral) c. Canada (Commission denqute sur les actions des reprsentants canadiens
relativement Maher Arar), 2007 CF 766, paragraphe 68 (1
re
instance)
3
Henrie c. Canada (Comit de surveillance des activits de renseignements de scurit), 1989 2 CF 229,
paragraphes 29 31 (1
re
instance), dcision confirme 1992 ACF n
o
100 (CA); Canada (Procureur gnral) c.
Kempo, 2004 CF 1678, paragraphes 89 92 (1
re
instance); Singh v. Canada (2000), 186 FTR 1, paragraphe 32
(1
re
instance) (en anglais seulement)
4
Arar, remarque 2, paragraphe 62
- 8 -
Nord (OTAN). Les transcriptions comprenaient de linformation sur les services de
renseignements, leurs rapports, le commandement, la structure de commandement des
diffrentes forces prsentes en Bosnie, les oprations militaires, les politiques sur la conduite
des oprations militaires, le rle et la conduite de certains acteurs, ainsi que lidentit des
sources et des cibles. Le juge a dtermin que la divulgation de certains renseignements
pourrait notamment : branler la confiance ncessaire pour permettre lOTAN dtre
efficace; compromettre le rle du Canada en tant que membre de lOTAN; rendre les allis du
Canada peu disposs lui communiquer des renseignements (ce qui empcherait le Canada
daccder linformation ncessaire pour protger les civils et les troupes); compromettre la
capacit de lOTAN et du Canada de mener des oprations militaires dans lavenir
5
.
23. En outre, il est noter que larticle 15 de la Loi sur laccs linformation
6
, qui
prvoit quil est possible de refuser la communication de documents contenant des
renseignements dont la divulgation risquerait de porter prjudice la dfense du Canada ,
fait tat des exemples suivants : des renseignements dordre tactique ou stratgique ou des
renseignements relatifs aux manuvres et oprations; des renseignements concernant la
quantit, les caractristiques, les capacits ou le dploiement des armes ou des matriels de
dfense; des renseignements concernant les caractristiques, les capacits, le rendement, le
potentiel, le dploiement, les fonctions, ou le rle des tablissements de dfense, des forces,
units ou personnel militaire; des lments dinformation recueillis ou prpars aux fins du
renseignement relatif la dfense du Canada ou dtats allis.
24. Daprs la jurisprudence, les relations internationales prsentent un grand intrt
pour plusieurs raisons. Lune des plus importantes est la suivante : le Canada est un
importateur net de renseignements sur la scurit. Il se doit donc de maintenir des relations
rciproques avec les organismes dorientation, les services de renseignements et les agences
de scurit des autres nations, et surtout de ses plus proches allis
7
. En outre, le Canada

5
Ribic c. Canada (Procureur gnral), 2003 CFPI 10, paragraphes 14 18 (1
re
instance); Canada (Procureur
gnral) c. Ribic, 2003 CFPI 43, paragraphes 14 et 15 (1
re
instance); dcision confirme dans Canada
(Procureur gnral) c. Ribic, 2003 CAF 246
6
LRC, 1985, chapitre A-1
7
Charkaoui c. Canada (Citoyennet et Immigration), [2007] CSC 9, paragraphe 68; Khadr c. Canada
(Procureur gnral), 2008 CF 549, paragraphe 93 (1
re
instance); Arar, remarque 2, paragraphes 77, 78 et 80
- 9 -
dpend de ses relations avec les autres nations pour atteindre ses objectifs en matire de
politique trangre, ainsi que pour faire la promotion des droits de la personne, de la
dmocratie et de la bonne gouvernance ltranger
8
. Les renseignements les plus souvent
soulevs dans le contexte des relations internationales sont les renseignements protgs par la
rgle des tiers ainsi que les critiques de pays ou de gouvernements trangers. En vertu de
la rgle des tiers, les renseignements obtenus dun tiers, habituellement un tat alli, ne
peuvent tre communiqus sans lautorisation du tiers en question
9
. Les critiques de
gouvernements trangers formules par le Canada peuvent tre protges dans lintrt des
relations internationales, sauf si lunique ou principale raison pour laquelle le gouvernement
veut faire interdire la divulgation est sa volont de se soustraire la critique ou dviter
lembarras
10
.
25. Lorsquils ont appliqu larticle 38 pour dterminer sil y avait eu prjudice, les
tribunaux ont pris en considration les principes d observateur bien inform et d effet de
mosaque . Pour ce faire, ils se sont demand sil tait question dune personne [] qui sy
connat en matire de scurit et qui est membre dun groupe constituant une menace,
prsente ou ventuelle, envers la scurit du Canada [] , qui pourrait interprter un
renseignement apparemment anodin en fonction des donnes quil possde dj, et qui serait
ainsi en mesure den arriver des dductions prjudiciables
11
. Les tribunaux incitent toutefois
la prudence en soulignant quil ne faut pas dpasser les limites du raisonnable les
inquitudes doivent tre fondes sur des faits prcis
12
.
26. Selon la jurisprudence relative larticle 38, linformation qui relve du domaine
public nest gnralement pas protge. Cependant, les tribunaux ont reconnu que cette rgle

8
Khadr, remarque 7, paragraphe 74; Arar, remarque 2, paragraphes 85 90
9
Canada (Procureur gnral) c. Khawaja, 2007 CF 490, paragraphe 139 (1
re
instance). La Cour fdrale a
formul trois rserves par rapport la rgle des tiers : 1) le Canada doit avoir tent dobtenir un consentement
la communication des renseignements avant dappliquer la rgle; 2) la rgle na aucune pertinence lorsque
lorganisme canadien a connaissance des renseignements avant de les avoir reus de lorganisme tranger; 3) la
rgle na pas pour effet de protger la simple existence dune relation entre le Canada et ltat tranger, en
labsence dun change de renseignements dans un cas donn. Khawaja, paragraphes 146 148.
10
Arar, remarque 2, paragraphes 82 84
11
Henrie, remarque 3, paragraphe 30
12
Khadr, remarque 7, paragraphes 74 77; Arar, remarque 2, paragraphe 84
- 10 -
gnrale ne sapplique pas lorsque seulement une partie de linformation a t communique
au public, lorsque linformation nest pas largement connue et accessible, lorsque
lauthenticit de linformation na t ni confirme ni infirme, et lorsque linformation a t
communique par inadvertance
13
.
27. Mme si nous nous sommes penchs sur la jurisprudence relative larticle 38, cet
article et son application nont aucune incidence directe sur le travail que nous devons raliser
dans le cadre du protocole dentente. Larticle 38 ne vise que les procdures devant un
tribunal, un organisme ou une personne ayant le pouvoir de contraindre la production de
renseignements , description qui ne sapplique pas au Groupe dexperts-arbitres. En outre, le
libell de larticle 38 diffre de celui du protocole dentente sur un certain nombre de points
importants. Notamment, le paragraphe 6 du protocole dentente contraint le Groupe
dexperts-arbitres prendre ses dcisions en tenant compte [] des objectifs fondamentaux
visant maximiser la divulgation et la transparence , et ce, [] sans compromettre la
scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou les relations internationales .
C. Approche applique par le Groupe dexperts-arbitres lexamen des caviardages
viss par le processus CSN
Approche gnrale
28. la lumire de tous ces facteurs, nous avons adopt lapproche suivante pour
examiner les caviardages viss par le processus CSN ports notre attention par le comit.
Nous tenons prciser que nous ne nous sommes penchs sur aucun caviardage dans les
parties de documents qui ntaient pas vises.
(a) Premirement, nous abordons lexamen de tous les caviardages en prsumant
que linformation caviarde devrait tre divulgue, en conformit avec les
objectifs fondamentaux visant maximiser la divulgation et la
transparence.

13
Arar, remarque 2, paragraphe 56
- 11 -
(b) Deuximement, nous nous demandons si la prsomption a t rfute parce
que la divulgation compromettrait la scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou
les relations internationales.
(c) Troisimement, si la prsomption est rfute, nous dterminons si
linformation caviarde peut tre rsume de manire ce quon puisse la
divulguer sans compromettre la scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou les
relations internationales. Sil est impossible de le faire, linformation ne sera
pas divulgue.
29. La plupart des caviardages viss par le processus CSN soumis notre examen par le
comit faisaient partie des catgories suivantes : 1) renseignements sur les dtenus;
2) communications confidentielles avec des reprsentants et des organisations de ltranger;
3) critiques lgard dinstitutions et de reprsentants de ltranger (surtout de lAfghanistan);
4) renseignements au sujet ou en provenance du Comit international de la Croix-Rouge
(CICR); 5) renseignements provenant de tiers; 6) noms de reprsentants de lAfghanistan;
7) renseignements sur les forces spciales du Canada; 8) renseignements sur les analyses des
rsidus de poudre canon. Nous dcrivons plus loin les approches labores pour chacune de
ces catgories. Nous avons tent autant que possible dappliquer ces approches de manire
uniforme. Cependant, comme nous avons pu le constater en examinant les caviardages
effectus par les reprsentants, personne nest parfait, et il est invitable que certaines
incohrences ressortent malgr tous les efforts dploys pour les viter.
Renseignements sur les dtenus
30. Certains des documents rfrs par le comit contenaient des renseignements sur des
personnes captures et, dans la plupart des cas, transfres par les Forces canadiennes. Parmi
ces renseignements taient inclus : la date exacte de la capture ou du transfert; le lieu de la
capture; le nombre de personnes captures ou impliques dans un incident donn; le sexe,
lge, le nom, la nationalit, la tribu et la date de naissance des personnes captures ou
impliques dans un incident donn; le nom du pays ou de ltablissement o les dtenus ont
t transfrs.
- 12 -
31. Notre approche lgard de ces documents est la suivante : les renseignements
divulgus ne doivent ni rvler ni permettre didentifier lidentit dun dtenu, quils soient
pris isolment ou en conjonction avec dautres renseignements. Nous avons adopt cette
approche en raison des inquitudes dont nous ont fait part les reprsentants du gouvernement,
qui estiment que les forces ennemies risquent de faire subir aux dtenus et leurs familles des
reprsailles et de graves prjudices corporels. Nous avons dcid de divulguer les
renseignements suivants : le mois et lanne de la capture, du transfert ou de la libration,
mais non la date et lheure; une estimation du nombre de personnes captures, transfres ou
libres dans le cadre dune opration donne (p. ex., moins de 20), mais non le nombre
exact; des renseignements gnraux sur ltat de sant des dtenus, mais rien au sujet des
maladies et des diagnostics. Les renseignements suivants demeurent caviards : le sexe; lge
( moins que le dtenu ne soit g de moins de 18 ans, auquel cas nous indiquons que le
dtenu est mineur, suivant la dfinition donne dans la Convention relative aux droits de
lenfant
14
); le nom (y compris le nom du pre et du grand-pre); le numro didentit; la
nationalit; le lieu de la capture; la tribu ou la rgion.
32. Dans certains des documents ports notre attention par le comit, les renseignements
concernant le temps qui stait coul entre le moment du transfert et celui de la notification
du CICR taient caviards. Il est question du CICR et de son rle en Afghanistan plus loin.
Les reprsentants du gouvernement nous ont aviss que, dans certains cas, si linformation
tait divulgue, le lecteur pourrait dterminer la date exacte de la capture et ainsi se faire une
ide de ltat davancement des oprations des Forces canadiennes. Pour viter de
compromettre la dfense nationale, nous avons remplac la dure exacte par une
approximation.
Communications confidentielles avec des reprsentants et des organisations de ltranger
33. Certains des documents dont nous avons t saisis par le comit renfermaient de
linformation au sujet du contenu de communications entre des reprsentants du Canada et des
reprsentants de gouvernements trangers (surtout de lAfghanistan) ou dorganisations
nationales ou internationales, comme le CICR et la Commission indpendante des droits de

14
Recueil des traits du Canada, 1992, n
o
3
- 13 -
lhomme en Afghanistan. Les communications avec le CICR ainsi que les critiques formules
par le Canada lgard des institutions et reprsentants afghans font toutes deux lobjet dune
section distincte.
34. Les reprsentants du gouvernement ont formul dimportantes rserves par rapport la
divulgation des communications intergouvernementales. Ils ont soutenu que toutes les parties
concernes sattendent ce que les communications diplomatiques demeurent confidentielles,
et que la divulgation de communications confidentielles, peu importe leur nature et leur
provenance, entranerait de graves consquences quil ne faut pas sous-estimer. En outre, ils
soutiennent que mme si des communications ont dj t divulgues, la divulgation dautres
renseignements ne ferait quempirer la situation. Les reprsentants du gouvernement se sont
dits inquiets du contenu des dmarches, qui sont des communications diplomatiques
officielles gnralement trs srieuses tant du point de vue de lexpditeur que de celui du
destinataire. Ces reprsentants nous ont dit que leur capacit dentreprendre et de poursuivre
ces dmarches efficacement ainsi que la volont des reprsentants trangers dy rpondre de
manire sincre et utile reposent sur la confidentialit.
35. Gardant lesprit les proccupations du gouvernement, mais aussi les objectifs
fondamentaux du protocole dentente, soit la divulgation et la transparence, nous avons dcid
de rsumer les communications en utilisant une formulation adapte au contexte, afin dviter
de compromettre la scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou les relations internationales.
Lorsque linformation ou une information semblable avait dj t divulgue ou tait
susceptible de ltre dans un contexte bien prcis (p. ex. une dclaration sur la position du
Canada lgard dune situation donne), nous lavons quand mme rsume lorsquelle
figurait dans une communication diplomatique officielle ou non. Les proccupations
souleves ne concernent pas tant le contenu des communications que leur caractre
diplomatique. Il est ncessaire de prserver la confiance et la confidentialit qui leur sont
inhrentes.
36. En ce qui concerne cette catgorie ainsi que dautres catgories de documents, notre
personnel a, dans la mesure du possible, rgulirement pass en revue linformation des
mdias crdibles, des rapports gouvernementaux et des rapports dorganisations
- 14 -
internationales, afin de dterminer si les renseignements caviards taient dj dans le
domaine public. Dans laffirmative, nous avons gnralement dcid de les divulguer.
Critiques lgard dinstitutions et de reprsentants de ltranger (surtout de
lAfghanistan)
37. Certains des documents ports notre attention par le comit renferment des critiques
ou des commentaires ngatifs formuls par le Canada lgard des institutions ou des
reprsentants de lAfghanistan. Dautres font tat de critiques formules par une institution ou
un reprsentant afghan lgard dun autre. Les reprsentants du gouvernement sinquitent
principalement du fait que ces renseignements pourraient nuire aux relations du Canada avec
les reprsentants du gouvernement et avec le systme de justice, ce qui pourrait en retour
nuire lhabilit du Canada de former ces reprsentants et institutions et de renforcer leurs
capacits, et mettre en pril les rformes que le Canada a russi instaurer jusqu prsent.
38. Compte tenu de ces proccupations et des diffrents types de documents qui nous ont
t rfrs, nous avons adopt lapproche suivante relativement aux documents contenant des
critiques et des commentaires formuls par le Canada dont, selon nous, la divulgation de
linformation caviarde serait prjudiciable la scurit nationale, la dfense nationale ou
aux relations internationales.
(a) De manire gnrale, lorsque le commentaire peut tre attribu au Canada, au
gouvernement du Canada, un ministre fdral ou un de ses hauts
fonctionnaires avec une certitude raisonnable, nous le rsumons. Les rsums
sont plus ou moins dtaills dans la mesure o le commentaire est explicite et
critique, la personne vise et le prjudice que pourrait causer leur divulgation.
(b) De manire gnrale, lorsque le commentaire semble relever de la spculation
et quil a t formul par un reprsentant canadien ntant pas un cadre
suprieur, nous conservons le caviardage ou nous le rsumons de manire trs
gnrale, en insistant sur le fait quil ne sagit que de lopinion dune personne
et non de celle du gouvernement du Canada.
- 15 -
(c) De manire gnrale, sil est du domaine public que le Canada ou un de ses
reprsentants est dune opinion donne ou a mis un certain commentaire (si
un mdia en fait mention, par exemple), nous divulguons cette opinion ou ce
commentaire. Si un mdia fait mention du commentaire ou de lopinion sans
toutefois indiquer quil provient du Canada, nous le rsumons au lieu de le
divulguer.
39. Lorsque la critique na pas t formule par le Canada, mais plutt par un
gouvernement ou une institution de ltranger, nous adoptons une approche lgrement
diffrente. Nous estimons quil ne revient pas au Canada de divulguer une critique formule
par une institution trangre au sujet dune autre, et ce, mme si elle pouvait savrer
pertinente et importante. Ce raisonnement repose sur la rgle des tiers (voir plus haut), en
vertu de laquelle les renseignements de scurit et linformation obtenus dun gouvernement
tranger, ainsi que leur source, ne peuvent tre divulgus sans permission. De manire
gnrale, lorsque lidentit de la source est donne (nom ou poste), nous conservons le
caviardage. Dans le cas contraire, et mme si le nom de linstitution dorigine est donn, nous
fournissons gnralement un rsum global.
40. Pour chacun des documents, nous utilisons notre jugement afin de dterminer si
linformation constitue rellement une critique et si elle serait dommageable si elle tait
divulgue. Les renseignements qui ne sont pas manifestement critiques nous proccupent
beaucoup moins que les renseignements qui sont trs critiques ou dont le langage est
incendiaire. Nous valuons galement lobjet de la critique et son caractre explicite.
41. Finalement, nous avons not des commentaires, assez frquents, formuls par des
reprsentants du Canada au sujet de mauvais traitements et de tortures infligs dans certains
tablissements de lAfghanistan. Vu limportance de la question des mauvais traitements,
notre approche gnrale, selon le langage utilis, consiste divulguer ces renseignements au
lieu de les rsumer.
Renseignements au sujet ou en provenance du CICR
42. Certains des documents soumis notre examen par le comit contiennent des
renseignements au sujet ou en provenance du CICR. Les renseignements relatifs au CICR
- 16 -
sont dans une catgorie unique sur laquelle nous nous sommes penchs avec beaucoup
dattention. En plus de nous renseigner au sujet du CICR auprs de fonctionnaires, notre
personnel a discut, directement avec des reprsentants du CICR, du rle de lorganisation et
de ses proccupations concernant la confidentialit de ses renseignements.
43. Le CICR, dont le sige est Genve, en Suisse, est une organisation indpendante,
neutre et impartiale qui uvre dans le domaine de laide humanitaire. Le CICR dcrit son rle
en Afghanistan comme suit : protger les dtenus et les aider rester en contact avec leurs
familles; surveiller les hostilits; prvenir les violations des droits de la personne; aider les
personnes blesses et handicapes
15
.
44. Le mandat du CICR est tabli dans les Conventions de Genve (1949), dans les
protocoles additionnels aux Conventions (1977), ainsi que dans ses Statuts, ceux du
Mouvement international de la Croix-Rouge et du Croissant-Rouge de mme que dans les
rsolutions adoptes par les Confrences internationales de la Croix-Rouge et du
Croissant-Rouge. Le CICR est prsent dans environ 80 pays et compte plus de
12 000 employs lchelle mondiale. Afin de fonctionner en toute neutralit et impartialit,
il mise depuis longtemps sur la confidentialit dans ses politiques et pratiques. Il exige des
communications bilatrales confidentielles des autorits avec lesquelles il travaille, et sattend
ce que celles-ci respectent et protgent la confidentialit de ses communications. La nature
confidentielle des communications du CICR est notamment essentielle pour lui permettre de
dialoguer avec les tats et les groupes participant aux conflits arms, de persuader les parties
en cause de respecter son droit daccs aux zones de conflit, et de protger son personnel sur
le terrain.
45. Le rle unique du CICR et la confidentialit entourant ses mthodes de travail ont t
reconnus par des tribunaux internationaux. Le droit du CICR la confidentialit a pour la
premire fois t confirm dans une dcision du Tribunal pnal international pour lancienne
Yougoslavie. Un procureur voulait appeler un ancien employ du CICR tmoigner, et le
Tribunal a dtermin que lorganisation avait le privilge absolu de refuser de fournir des

15
The ICRC in Afghanistan (en ligne) http://www.icrc.org/eng/where-we-work/asia-
pacific/afghanistan/index.jsp.
- 17 -
lments de preuve dans le cadre de procdures judiciaires compte tenu des traits
internationaux applicables et du droit coutumier
16
. Ont suivi les dcisions de la Chambre
dappel du Tribunal pnal international pour lancienne Yougoslavie et du Tribunal
international pour le Rwanda
17
. Le privilge du CICR lgard de ses communications a
galement t intgr au Rglement de procdure et de preuve de la Cour pnale
internationale
18
.
46. Compte tenu des proccupations du CICR, de son important mandat et des discussions
qua eues notre personnel avec des reprsentants du CICR, nous avons adopt lapproche
suivante pour examiner le caviardage des renseignements sur le CICR ou provenant de
celui-ci.
(a) Nous faisons mention des discussions et des rencontres du Canada avec le
CICR. Le CICR a indiqu notre personnel que le public sait quil rencontre
les autorits gouvernementales pour leur rappeler leurs obligations
internationales, en vertu du mandat que lui confrent les Conventions de
Genve.
(b) De manire gnrale, nous ne divulguons pas les renseignements transmis au
CICR par le Canada. Il peut arriver que nous rsumions les renseignements
communiqus au sujet de questions entourant le dossier des dtenus.
(c) Nous ne divulguons pas dinformation qui se rapporte au CICR ou qui en
provient, et qui puisse lui tre attribue directement ou par dduction, moins
quelle nait dj t diffuse. Il nous arrive de divulguer le contenu des
communications, habituellement au moyen dun rsum, lorsque linformation
nest pas directement attribue au CICR et quil nest pas possible de le
dterminer. Compte tenu du rle du CICR et de son accs privilgi aux

16
Prosecutor v. Simic, affaire n
o
IT-95-9, Decision on the Prosecution Motion Under Rule 73 for a Ruling
Concerning the Testimony of a Witness , le 27 juillet 1999
17
Prosecutor v. Brdjanin, Appeals Chamber, affaire n
o
IT-99-36, Decision on Interlocutory Appeals, 11
December 2002, paragraphe 32; Prosecutor v. Muvunyi, affaire n
o
ICTR-2000-55, Reasons for the Chambers
Decision on the Accuseds Motion to Exclude Witness TQ, le 15 juillet 2005, paragraphes 14 16
18
Article 73, Rglement de procdure et de preuve, Cour pnale internationale
- 18 -
renseignements sur les dtenus, il est souvent vident que linformation
provient du CICR, mme lorsquelle ne lui est pas attribue. Si cest le cas,
nous conservons les caviardages.
47. Cette approche sapplique tous les renseignements qui circulent entre le Canada et le
CICR, quil sagisse dinformation ou dvaluations portant sur les procdures du Canada ou
dinformation ou dvaluations sur les tablissements et les autorits de lAfghanistan. Selon
le CICR, rien ne justifie que lon diffrencie ces types de renseignements.
Renseignement provenant de tiers
48. Certains documents ports notre attention par le comit contiennent des
renseignements provenant de tiers, comme des gouvernements trangers et des organisations
intergouvernementales (comme lOTAN et sa Force internationale dassistance la scurit).
En conformit avec la rgle des tiers, qui est dcrite au paragraphe 24 ci-dessus, nous ne
divulguons ni ne rsumons les renseignements provenant de tiers, moins quils naient dj
t rendus publics.
Noms de reprsentants de lAfghanistan
49. Certains documents dont nous avons t saisis par le comit contiennent les noms de
reprsentants afghans, y compris de cadres suprieurs. Notre approche est de ne pas divulguer
ces noms moins que linformation nait dj t diffuse grande chelle. Comme cest le
cas pour les dtenus, il est souvent trs probable quun responsable afghan dont le nom est
mentionn dans un document fasse lobjet de reprsailles ou subisse un grave prjudice. En
outre, il est possible que la divulgation de tels renseignements compromette les relations entre
le Canada et le gouvernement de lAfghanistan. Lorsque possible, nous avons rsum
linformation sans mentionner de noms.
Renseignements sur les forces spciales du Canada
50. Certains des documents ports notre attention par le comit contiennent des
renseignements sur les forces spciales du Canada en Afghanistan. Vu la nature de leur
mission, linformation sur leurs activits nest pas habituellement rendue publique. Compte
tenu des enjeux entourant la scurit, nous avons dcid de ne pas divulguer ni rsumer les
- 19 -
renseignements relatifs aux activits des forces spciales, moins quils naient dj t
diffuss. Les renseignements qui semblent avoir t rendus publics sont les suivants : a) la
prsence des forces spciales en Afghanistan; b) la nature gnrale du rle des forces
spciales en Afghanistan.
Renseignements sur les analyses des rsidus de poudre canon
51. Certains des documents soumis notre examen par le comit contiennent de
linformation au sujet danalyses de rsidus de poudre canon menes en Afghanistan. Le
gouvernement a publiquement reconnu que les Forces canadiennes procdent de telles
analyses. Selon lapproche que nous avons adopte, nous divulguons les renseignements sur
lutilisation des analyses et les rsultats obtenus dans des circonstances prcises, mais nous
conservons les autres caviardages pour viter de compromettre la dfense nationale.
D. tat de lexamen des caviardages viss par le processus CSN
52. Le comit, aprs avoir pass en revue les documents quil a reus du gouvernement, a
soumis environ 2 300 pages de documents lexamen du Groupe dexperts-arbitres. Dans
certains cas, le comit a saisi le Groupe dexperts-arbitres de documents entiers, tandis qu
dautres occasions, il ne sagissait que de quelques pages, paragraphes ou passages.
53. En octobre 2010, afin de faciliter son travail et de lui permettre de divulguer le rsultat
de ses travaux avant davoir examin tous les documents, le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a
demand au comit de lui indiquer quels documents il considraient prioritaires. Le comit a
prsent une liste de documents prioritaires en octobre 2010, liste qui a t allonge la
mi-dcembre 2010, puis prcise en mars 2011. Quelque 1 450 pages sont vises.
54. Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a termin son examen des documents prioritaires, et a
aussi pris des dcisions concernant un certain nombre de documents figurant sur la liste
intgrale. Lorsque seulement une partie dun document est vise, le Groupe dexperts-arbitres
ne se penche que sur les caviardages figurant dans la partie en question; encore une fois, nous
ne nous sommes penchs sur aucun caviardage figurant dans une partie de document qui
ntait pas vise.
- 20 -
55. Un processus long et complexe doit tre suivi pour appliquer les dcisions du Groupe
dexperts-arbitres. Ce processus incombe une unit spciale du ministre de la Justice qui
dispose des technologies et des ressources ncessaires pour supprimer les caviardages jugs
inutiles et rsumer linformation dune manire qui ne compromette pas la scurit nationale,
la dfense nationale ou les relations internationales. Pour ce faire, lunit utilise un logiciel
spcial et scuritaire. Une fois les dcisions du Groupe dexperts-arbitres appliques, les
documents nous sont rendus et notre personnel les examine une dernire fois avant de les
divulguer. Il sagit dun travail laborieux et chronophage, mais il est ncessaire compte tenu
du caractre dlicat et confidentiel de la tche.
56. Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a termin son examen des documents prioritaires, mais
ils ne sont pas tous prts tre divulgus en raison de ce processus. Cependant, la
suggestion du comit, nous avons augment la priorit de 113 de ces documents prioritaires. Il
sagit du premier lot de documents que nous avons examins suivant le mandat que nous
confre le protocole dentente et qui sont prts tre divulgus. Ce lot de documents, qui
reflte les rsultats de notre examen, est disponible avec ce rapport. La table des matires de
ces documents spcifie les portions des documents qui nous ont t rfrs par le comit.
Nous avions envisag de continuer fournir des lots de documents au comit au fur et
mesure quils seraient prts.
IV. APPROCHE ADOPTE PAR LE GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
LGARD DES RENSEIGNEMENTS ASSUJETTIS AU SECRET
PROFESSIONNEL ET DES RENSEIGNEMENTS CONFIDENTIELS DU
CABINET
A. Introduction
57. La deuxime tche qui incombe au Groupe dexperts-arbitres en vertu du protocole
dentente est lexamen des caviardages des renseignements assujettis au secret professionnel
et des renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet. Il sagit du processus dcrit au paragraphe 7
du protocole dentente. Cette tche diffre du processus CSN en ce que le comit ne peut pas
soumettre ces caviardages lexamen du Groupe dexperts-arbitres. En fait, le comit ne voit
les renseignements caviards que si le Groupe dexperts-arbitres dcide den supprimer le
caviardage ou de les rsumer.
- 21 -
58. Dans le protocole dentente, on peut notamment lire ce qui suit :
Reconnaissant que les renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet et les
renseignements protgs par le secret professionnel avocat-client sont les
catgories de renseignements que le Parlement reconnat depuis longtemps
comme tant confidentielles et pouvant tre exemptes de divulgation.
59. Le paragraphe 7 du protocole dentente prvoit :
Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres peut dterminer, la demande du gouvernement,
que certains renseignements ne devraient pas tre divulgus en raison du secret
professionnel qui lie lavocat son client. Aprs avoir consult le greffier du
Conseil priv, le Groupe dexperts-arbitres peut galement dterminer, la
demande du gouvernement, que linformation qui constitue des renseignements
confidentiels du Cabinet ne devrait pas tre divulgue. Dans les deux cas, le
Groupe dexperts-arbitres peut dterminer comment communiquer aux
membres du Parlement et au public, laide des moyens quil juge opportuns,
linformation contenue dans les documents sans compromettre le secret
professionnel avocat-client, ni le principe de confidentialit du Cabinet et sans
perdre de vue que lobjectif est davoir la plus grande divulgation et la plus
grande transparence possibles. Si le Groupe dexperts-arbitres est davis que
certains renseignements ne devraient pas tre divulgus, le Groupe
dexperts-arbitres fournira les raisons de sa dcision au comit spcial.
60. lgard des tches dcrites au paragraphe 7 du protocole dentente, le Groupe
dexperts-arbitres a dcid dappliquer les lois relatives au secret professionnel et aux
renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet, tout en gardant lesprit les objectifs fondamentaux
visant maximiser la divulgation et la transparence. Notre mthodologie consiste 1)
dterminer la lumire des exigences juridiques si le secret ou la confidentialit peuvent tre
valablement invoqus; 2) dans laffirmative, dterminer si linformation vise peut tre
divulgue de faon rsume sans droger au secret ou la confidentialit; 3) si cela est
possible, rdiger le rsum appropri; 4) si cela nest pas possible, maintenir le caviardage.
B. Secret professionnel avocat-client
Exigences juridiques
61. En vertu du droit canadien, le secret professionnel avocat-client est quasi absolu.
Daprs les tribunaux du Canada, le secret professionnel est un droit fondamental reconnu par
- 22 -
la loi et par la Constitution qui est essentiel au bon fonctionnement de notre systme
juridique
19
. Il sapplique toutes les interactions entre un avocat et son client lorsque lavocat
est retenu pour offrir des conseils ou pour remplir dautres fonctions dordre juridique, plutt
quen tant que conseiller oprationnel ou des fins non juridiques. Il sapplique aux
communications entre les reprsentants et les avocats du gouvernement au mme titre qu
toute autre communication entre un avocat et son client
20
.
62. Pour que le secret professionnel sapplique, quatre conditions sont requises : 1) il doit
y avoir une communication entre lavocat et son client; 2) la communication doit avoir
comme objectif la formulation ou lobtention de conseils juridiques; 3) la communication doit
tre effectue en toute confidentialit et avec une expectation raisonnable quelle demeurera
confidentielle; 4) la communication doit reposer sur lexpertise professionnelle de lavocat.
Le secret professionnel est gnralement dfinitif, moins que le client ny renonce
21
.
tat de lexamen des renseignements assujettis au secret professionnel
63. Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a substantiellement complt sa revue des
renseignements caviards dans les documents remis au Comit jusqu ce jour et assujettis au
secret professionnel. Ce faisant, il a donn instruction son personnel dobtenir de
linformation supplmentaire des reprsentants gouvernementaux afin de sassurer du bien-
fond de cette demande. Au cours de ce processus, lassujettissement de certains
renseignements au secret professionnel a t lev en totalit ou en partie.
64. En application de la loi pertinente, le Groupe a dtermin que, quelques exceptions
prs, lassujettissement de ces renseignements au secret professionnel tait fond : la plupart
des renseignements satisfaisaient aux quatre conditions nonces ci-dessus.
65. Lorsque nous avons dtermin que des cas satisfaisaient ces conditions, de sorte que
la revendication du secret professionnel tait bien fonde, nous nous sommes demand si,
conformment notre mandat daprs le protocole et notre mthodologie, un rsum des

19
Descteaux c. Mierzwinski, [1982] 1 R.C.S. 860
20
Pritchard v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission) (2003), 63 O.R. (3d) 97 (C.A.) (en anglais seulement)
21
Blank c. Canada (Ministre de la Justice), [2006] 2 R.C.S. 319
- 23 -
passages caviards voire les faits minimums quils voquaient pouvait tre divulgu sans
droger au secret professionnel. Nous avons jug que cela ntait pas possible. Premirement,
le faire aurait divulgu lobjet dune demande davis juridique et donc drog audit secret.
Deuximement, le faire naurait pas t conforme au rejet par la Cour suprme du Canada
dune distinction pour ce qui est de dterminer si ce secret porte sur lavis juridique ou le
compte rendu des faits sous-jacents.
22
En principe, tous deux sont protgs par le secret
professionnel.
66. Nous avons dress, pour la remettre au Comit en mme temps que le prsent rapport,
une liste 1) des documents pour lesquels la revendication du secret professionnel a t juge
non fonde en totalit ou en partie; 2) des documents assujettis au secret professionnel pour
lesquels le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a jug que la revendication dudit secret tait fonde; 3)
des documents assujettis au secret professionnel pour lesquels le Groupe dexperts-arbitres a
jug que la revendication dudit secret ntait pas fonde.
67. Nous avons galement prvu remettre au Comit en mme temps que le prsent
rapport des copies rcentes des documents assujettis au secret professionnel pour lesquels on a
retir la revendication audit secret ou le Groupe la juge non fonde. Dans les versions de ces
documents, les caviardages effectus par suite de la revendication du secret professionnel ont
t supprims.
C. Renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet
Exigences juridiques
68. En revanche, le droit commun entourant les renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet,
qui sapplique aux documents examins par le Groupe dexperts-arbitres dans le cadre du
protocole dentente, nexclut pas compltement la divulgation. La Cour suprme du Canada a
plutt dclar que, sous le rgime du droit commun, les documents du Cabinet doivent tre
divulgus, moins que cela ne porte atteinte lintrt public
23
. Cependant, puisque ces

22
Maranda v. Qubec (Juge de la Cour du Qubec), [2003] 3.S.C.R. 193.
23
Carey c. Ontario, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 637
- 24 -
documents concernent le processus dcisionnel lchelon le plus lev du gouvernement, les
tribunaux doivent agir avec prudence en ordonnant leur production.
69. La Cour a dress la liste des facteurs dont il est pertinent de tenir compte pour
dterminer si la divulgation serait contraire lintrt public : le palier du processus
dcisionnel dont relve linformation; la nature de la politique en question (p. ex. des
documents relatifs la scurit nationale ou la dfense nationale peuvent tre traits
diffremment de documents sur une politique en matire de tourisme); le contenu des
documents; la divulgation peut savrer ncessaire pour assurer le bon fonctionnement du
gouvernement sil sagit daccusations de prvarication dans la conduite des activits du
gouvernement; la date figurant sur les documents ou linformation et si le processus
dcisionnel est toujours en vigueur; limportance quil y a produire les documents dans
lintrt de ladministration de la justice, en tenant compte de limportance de la cause ainsi
que de la ncessit et de lopportunit de produire les documents afin que la cause puisse tre
plaide dune manire adquate et quitable. Le privilge de confidentialit du Cabinet ne se
limite pas aux documents du Cabinet. Par exemple, il peut sappliquer aux communications
entre ministres ou auxquelles participent des ministres.
70. Au niveau fdral, le droit commun relatif aux documents confidentiels du Cabinet a
t dans une large mesure remplac par larticle 39 de la Loi sur la preuve au Canada, qui
permet de refuser la divulgation si le privilge de confidentialit du Cabinet est bien justifi.
Cependant, larticle 39 sapplique uniquement lorsque la question de la divulgation est
soumise un tribunal, une personne ou un organisme qui a le pouvoir de contraindre la
production de renseignements. Puisque le Groupe dexperts-arbitres ne correspond pas cette
description, larticle 39 est inapplicable ses dcisions de divulguer ou non des
renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet.
- 25 -
tat de lexamen des renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet
71. Le gouvernement vient tout juste de soumettre au Groupe dexperts-arbitres ses
revendications quant aux renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet figurant dans les
documents produits par le gouvernement ce jour. Le Groupe dexperts-arbitres entend
terminer son examen des caviardages le plus rapidement possible.
Page 1 of 2
March
(Fewer than five persons)
(fewer than five persons.)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in March and released the same day.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
March
The
individuals were
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in March and transferred to the NDS on the same day.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
May May
The
individuals were
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in May and released in less than one week.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
May
(Fewer than
five persons were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in May and remaining in custody pending transfer to Afghan
authorities]
Page 1 of 7
Page 2 of 7
Page 3 of 7
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
Page 4 of 7
Page 5 of 7
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than five)
Page 6 of 7
Page 7 of 7
Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4
(mistreatment during Interrogations may occur.)
(fewer than 15)
no
Page 3 of 4
(fewer than 5)
over 200
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 30)
[A generalized allegation of mistreatment and references
to detainees' fear of beatings were discussed.]
Page 4 of 4
(fewer than 10)
(remaining)
[Canada's position on the allegation of detainee mistreatment, the need for
clarification about the allegation, and a possible response were discussed.]
[Afghanistan's policy on the treatment of detainees and support for an investigation of the allegation were
discussed.]
[Certain parties
expressed the view that the allegation did not conform with practices. Speculation about the reason for the allegation was
offered, and support for an investigation was given.]
[Possible individual corrective measures were discussed.]
but ended
Our Ambassador in Kabul
at the request of the NDS.
Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4
(mistreatment during interrogations may occur.)
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC)
have also looked into the matter.
Page 3 of 4
200 detainees
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
[A generalized allegation of mistreatment and references to detainees' fear of beatings were discussed.]
[Canada's position on the allegation of detainee mistreatment, the need for
clarification about the allegation, and a possible response were discussed.]
((who had a prior injury))
if he did not answer the questions properly, the interrogator would force him to stand for hours which would cause him
pain because of his
(prior injury)
[Details of an internal NDS
investigation were outlined, including a reported mistranslation issue with regard to the allegation.]
Page 4 of 4
(staff.)
Page 1 of 9
Page 2 of 9
Page 3 of 9
(fewer than 30)
Page 4 of 9
[Allegations of detainee
mistreatment and a possible response were discussed.]
Page 5 of 9
[Allegations of detainee mistreatment and a possible response were discussed.]
Page 6 of 9
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 10)
(more than half of the fewer than 10)
(less than 3
month stay)
Page 7 of 9
(fewer than 30)
4
(18
(25
Page 8 of 9
All four
(Some)
(some)
four
2 month stay
4
Page 9 of 9
Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4
(NDS official)
(discuss with)
Page 3 of 4
(fewer than 300)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 10)
(NDS official)
(NDS officials)
an NDS official
(NDS official)
(fewer than 5)
(NDS official)
June
for a total of approximately hours
Page 4 of 4
the NDS Director.
with the NDS
(NDS officials to express
concerns)
with the NDS director to formally request that the NDS investigate these
allegations
(will discuss obligations regarding treatment of detainees.)
[Reference was made to follow-up action with respect to the investigation]
Page 1 of 5
Page 2 of 5
(the denial of full unrestricted access to the Kandahar NDS
detention facility.)
(discussed Canada's position with an Afghan official who relayed this position to
other parties.)
and has secured a meeting with
(a senior NDS official)
[Further action regarding the transfer arrangements was recommended.]
following refusal by the
Afghan National Directorate for Security (NDS) to grant Canada
unrestricted access to the NDS detainee facility in Kandahar city
Page 3 of 5
[The denial of
Canadian officials' and other parties' unrestricted access to the Kandahar detention facility was discussed.]
[A concern about the
consequences of the denial of access to increase the potential for mistreatment was stated.]
however, they could not access the detention area
[Awareness of the issue
and continued restrictions on access were discussed.]
(the senior NDS official) (In other discussions with another NDS official, Canada's position on
access was discussed.)
[Canada communicated its position to the senior NDS official, sought clarification on the issue and sought
to arrange a further meeting with another NDS official. Canada was informed that its position on access was relayed to this official.]
(this official)
[NDS' non-compliance with the terms of its arrangements was discussed.]
Page 4 of 5
(Fewer than 10)
(provincial-level)
[A potential demarche was discussed.]
[A previous demarche was discussed.]
(the denial of access)
Page 5 of 5
[Canada's position on the denial of unrestricted access to NDS facilities was expressed,
and NDS' commitments under its agreements, the need for clarification, and the
resumption of visits and transfers were discussed.]
Page 1 of 2
(fewer than 5 persons)
June.
Fit: no injuries
after June was
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 7
Page 2 of 7
Page 3 of 7
Page 4 of 7
Page 5 of 7
Page 6 of 7
(could theoretically raise concerns about mistreatment.)
the consequent delay in access to
the cells
Page 7 of 7
[Canada's preference for a spot
check approach to verifying the release of detainees was stated.]
or it may be that Sarpoza staff had been reluctant to
release (a subset of prisoners)
Page 1 of 2
(fewer than 5 people)
July,
July July
Jul Jul
July
July
July
July
July
July
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
transferred immediately to ANP.
condition upon transfer: Good health
General physical
condition upon transfer: Good health
General physical
General physical condition upon transfer: Good health
General
physical condition upon transfer: Good health
General
Page 2 of 2
physical condition upon transfer: Good health
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
Detained on
transferred to the NDS.
General physical condition upon transfer: Good
General physical
condition upon transfer: Good Health
General physical condition upon transfer: Suffering from soft trauma
released by the NDS following transfer
released by the NDS.
July
July
July
July
July
July
July
Page 1 of 2
August
August
August
August
August
August
(fewer than fifteen)
August
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
September September
(fewer than five people)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in September and transferred within one week.]
Page 1 of 2
September September
(fewer than 5 people.)
letter
Detained September transferred
Detained
September transferred
Detained September transferred September
September
September
General physical condition upon release: Good/fit for release
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
September September
Page 1 of 2
September
(fewer than five people.)
Page 2 of 2
September
(fewer than five people.)
Page 1 of 2
September September September
October
(Fewer than
five were)
(Fewer than five)
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
October
October October
October October
October
(fewer than fifteen people)
(Fewer than
five were)
(Fewer than ten
were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in October and transferred to the NDS
or released in less than ten days.]
(Fewer than five were)
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
November
November
(fewer than 10 ten people)
(Fewer than
ten were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in November and transferred to the NDS
in less than one week.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
November November
(Fewer than
ten were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in November and transferred to the ANP
or NDS in less than one week, or whose date of transfer was not listed.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
November
November
(fewer than ten people)
(Fewer than
10 were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in November and transferred to the ANP or
NDS in less than one week, or whose date of transfer was not listed.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
January
January
(Fewer than 5
were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in January and released in less than
one week.]
Page 1 of 1
January
January
(Fewer than
five)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in January and released in less than one
week.]
Page 1 of 10
Page 2 of 10
Page 3 of 10
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than five)
Page 4 of 10
were
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than five)
Page 5 of 10
(moins de 30)
(moins de cinq)
Page 6 of 10
(moins de 30)
(moins de cinq)
Page 7 of 10
(minor)
Page 8 of 10
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than five)
(fewer
than five)
Aug other
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 20)
(a senior official) (fewer than five)
Page 9 of 10
Page 10 of 10
Page 1 of 2
January January
The
individuals were all
(fewer than five persons)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in January and transferred to the NDS in
less than one week.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
January
January
The
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in January and transferred to the NDS
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
January January
The
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in January and transferred to the NDS
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
February February
(Fewer than
five persons were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in February and transferred to the NDS
Page 1 of 2
January
The
individuals were
(fewer than ten persons)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in January and transferred to the NDS
on the same day.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
February
The
individuals were
(fewer than ten persons)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in February and transferred to the NDS on
the same day.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 11
Page 2 of 11
Page 3 of 11
presses the GoA to investigate,
to clearly impress upon NDS and Government of
Aghanistan officials, in Kandahar and in Kabul, the seriousness with which the Government of
Canada takes all allegations of abuse;
Page 4 of 11
[The topics that were to be addressed in the demarche included Canada's response to the
allegation of abuse, Canada's expectations of Afghanistan in respect of such allegations and
the detention of Canadian-transferred detainees generally, and Canada's offer of assistance.]
Page 5 of 11
Page 6 of 11
Page 7 of 11
presser le
gouvernement de l'Afghanistan de faire enqute, tout en garantissant la confidentialit du
dtenu
bien faire comprendre la DNS et aux reprsentants du gouvernement de l'Afghanistan la
gravit de ces allgations de violence aux yeux du gouvernement du Canada; et 4) dterminer
Page 8 of 11
[Les sujets traits dans la dmarche comprenaient la rponse du Canada l'allgation
de mauvais traitements, les attentes du Canada l'gard de l'Afghanistan relativement
de telles allgations et la dtention de dtenus transfrs par le Canada en gnral,
l'offre d'assistance faite par le Canada, et les dlais dans lesquels le gouvernement de
l'Afghanistan devait rpondre diverses questions et proccupations souleves.]
Page 9 of 11
5
05
(the senior official)
[NDS's commitment to the terms of both Arrangements, and the level of support from KPRT were
discussed.]
5
(a senior official)
(The senior official) (The senior official)
Page 10 of 11
1
The one interview
one hour
(fewer than 10)
(the Chief of Investigations)
Page 11 of 11
(a senior official)
(a senior official)
Page 1 of 1
February Feb
(fewer than five persons).
(Fewer than
five persons were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in February and transferred to the NDS in less than one
week.]
Page 1 of 2
March March
The
individuals were
(fewer than ten persons.)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in March and transferred to the NDS in less than one week.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
March
The
individuals were
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in March and transferred to the NDS the same day.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2
March March
The
individuals were
[Details were provided regarding fewer than ten detainees detained in March and transferred to the NDS within one week.]
Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1
March
(Fewer than
5 persons were)
[Details were provided regarding fewer than five detainees detained in March released the same day.]
PANEL OF ARBITERS
June 15, 2011
The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
284 Wellington Street
4th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario KIA oH8
Dear Minister:
Re: Afghan Detainee Documents
We are writing to you in our capacity as members of the Panel ofArbiters established by the
Memorandum of Understanding dated June 15, 2010, signed by the Prime Minister and the then
Leader of the Official Opposition and leader of the Bloc Quebecois. In light of the developments
to which we will refer below, we have been asked to transmit to you for tabling in the House of
Commons our report and the results of the work completed by the Panel to date. Before
describing the material that we are transmitting, we think it appropriate to set out the context
for its transmission.
On April 13, 2011, following the dissolution of the 40th Parliament, we wrote to the signatories
of the MOU to set out our understanding of the Panel's role under the MOU and the
consequences of the dissolution on its ability to carry out its mandate. As we explained, we
understand that the role of the Panel under the MOU formed part of the mechanism adopted
follo"ing the April 27, 2010 ruling of the then Speaker of the House of Commons for making
government documents related to the transfer ofAfghan detainees from the Canadian Forces to
Afghan authorities available to the House of Commons in response to the House's order for
production, without compromising the security and confidentiality of the information that the
documents contain. The MOU, as we understand it, contemplated that the Panel would report
on its work to the Ad Hoc Committee of Parliamentarians, comprising Members of Parliament
designated by the signatories, which like the Panel was established in accordance with the MOU.
The MOU also provided that the documents that the Panel has reviewed would be tabled in the
House as they became available following the Panel's review.
The MOU called for regular consultation (which occurred) between the Panel and the Ad Hoc
Committee of Parliamentarians. At the request of the Committee, the Panel had organized its
work so as to be in a position to provide to the Committee on or about April 15, 2011 a report
describing its mandate, work and methodology, together with the results of its review of an
initial set of documents, taken from the documents assigned priority by the Committee.
Following the sudden passing of fellow Panel member Donald Brenner on March 12, 2011, we
carried on with the completion of this important task, and instructed our staff to continue their
work in preparing further documents for the Panel's review, so that these documents could in
turn be released once the Panel had made its determinations concerning the redactions that they
contain.
L
I.:;.
..
-2
Our April 13 letter also conveyed our understanding that, according to Parliamentary law, the
dissolution of the 40th Parliament by proclamation of the Governor General on March 26, 2011
meant that the House that adopted the order for production of Afghan detainee documents
ceased to exist, and those who were members of the House no longer had the status of Members
of Parliament. As a consequence of the dissolution, therefore, there was no longer an Ad Hoc
Committee of Parliamentarians to which the Panel could provide its report and the results of its
work, and no documents could be tabled in the House. We noted that while the MOU
contemplated that under certain conditions it would survive the dissolution of Parliament,
whether those conditions would be met could not be ascertained until the House reconvened.
We went on to acknowledge the considerable time and effort that had been devoted to fulfilling
the mandate of the Panel under the MOU. We indicated that, in these circumstances, we
considered that it would not be appropriate to cease our work before completing what the Panel
undertook to the Ad Hoc Committee of Parliamentarians it would seek to complete by mid
April. We advised that we therefore intended to finalize the Panel's report and the preparation of
the documents that were to accompany it by April 15 or shortly afterwards. However, since there
was no longer a Committee in existence to which we could deliver it pursuant to the MOU and
the Panel's undertaking to the Committee, we would retain this material pending the
summoning of a new Parliament and any further directions that might be provided to the Panel
at that time. We indicated that we had also instructed our staff to continue their preparatory
work relating to other documents the Committee referred to the Panel, so that the Panel would
be in a position to make determinations concerning those documents should it ultimately be
called on to do so. We indicated that the Panel would make no further determinations beyond
those reflected in its April report until its future role, if any, was clarified.
With one modification, we have proceeded as we indicated we would proceed in our April 13
letter. We completed by mid-April a report describing the Panel's work and methodology. We
also prepared by mid-April, in a form that could be tabled, the results of the Panel's review of an
initial set of documents, taken from the documents assigned priority by the Committee. The
modification is that we have also completed our review of, and determinations concerning, the
remaining documents to which the Committee assigned priority. We considered it appropriate
that we be in a position to communicate the results of our review of these additional documents
should we be called upon to do so. In making our determinations concerning these documents,
we continued to apply the methodology and approach set out in our April report. We did not
undertake a review of the Government's claims of Cabinet confidence, since we received
confirmation of these claims only shortly before Parliament was dissolved. Nor did we complete
our review of all of the Government's claims of solicitor-client privilege, though we were able to
review and make determinations concerning most of them.
Following the opening of the 1 st Session of the 41 st Parliament, we were advised by the
Government that it is unlikely that the MOU will be renewed, but that the Government intends to
table the Panel's April20ll report and all documents reviewed by the Panel in Parliament. We
were asked to transmit to you for this purpose both the report and the documents that we have
reviewed and in respect of which we have made determinations.
We are accordingly transmitting to you with this letter the following material:
(1) the Panel's April 2011 report, which describes the Panel's mandate, its work, and the
methodology it has followed;
L
(2) the results of the Panel's review of and determinations concerning 362 documents referred
to us by the Committee, comprising the documents assigned priority by the Committee
together with several additional documents whose review had been undertaken before the
Committee removed them from its priority list; and
(3) a list showing the disposition of the claims of solicitor-client privilege that the Panel has
considered.
Since this letter describes our activities since our April report, the Government may wish to
consider tabling this letter in Parliament together with the material we are transmitting with it.
We understand that no further work is now expected of the Panel. We appreciate the confidence
that was placed in us as Panel members, and were honoured to have served in this capacity.
Yours faithfully,
Claire L'Heureux-Dube Frank Iacobucci
las
Enclosures

GROUPE D'EXPERTS-ARBITRES
Ie 15 juin 2011
L'honorable Robert Douglas Nicholson
Ministre de la Justice et Procureur g meral du Canada
284, rue Wellington
4eetage
Ottawa (Ontario) KIA oH8
Monsieur Ie Ministre:
Objet: Documents relatifs aux detenus afghans
Nous vous ecrivons en qualite de membres du Groupe d'experts-arbitres constitue par Ie
Protocole d'entente du 15 juin 2010, signe par Ie Premier Ministre ainsi que Ie chef de
l'opposition officielle et Ie chef du Bloc Quebecois tels qu'ils etaient alors. A Ia lumiere des
evenements, sur lesquels nous reviendrons plus loin, on nous a demande de transmettre notre
rapport pour depOt it la Chambre des Communes accompagne du resultat de nos travaux it date.
Avant de ce faire, nous croyons approprie de decrire Ie contexte dans lequel cette transmission a
lieu.
Le 13 avril, 2011, it la dissolution de la 40e legislature, nous avons ecrit aux signataires du
Protocole d'entente afin d'exposer notre comprehension de notre role dans Ie cadre du Protocole
ainsi que les consequences de la dissolution sur notre capacite de nous acquitter de notre
mandat. Comme nous l' avons explique, nous comprenons que notre role dans Ie cadre du
Protocole d'entente fait partie du mecanisme adopte it la suite de la decision du 27 avri12010 du
President de la Chambre des communes d'alors de demander au gouvernement de mettre ala
disposition de la Chambre des Communes les documents lies au transfert par les Forces
canadiennes des detenus afghans aux autorites afghanes en reponse it l'ordonnance de la
Chambre portant sur la production des documents, sans compromettre la securite et la
confidentialite des renseignements contenus dans ces documents. Le Protocole d'entente, selon
notre comprehension, envisageait que Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres ferait rapport de ses travaux
au Comite special de Parlementaires, compose de membres du Parlement designes par les
signataires qui, comme Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres, a ete constitue en conformite avec Ie
Protocole d'entente. Le Protocole prevoyait egalement que les documents examines par Ie
Groupe d'experts-arbitres seraient deposes ala Chambre des qu'ils seraient disponibles.
Le Protocole d'entente prevoyait des consultations regulieres (qui ont eu lieu) entre Ie Groupe
d'experts-arbitres et Ie Comite special de parlementaires. Ala demande du Comite, Ie Groupe
d'experts-arbitres a organise ses travaux de maniere ace qu'il soit en mesure de fournir au
Comite, vers Ie 15 avril 2011, un rapport decrivant son mandat, son travail et sa methodologie
ainsi que Ie resultat de son examen d'une premiere serie de documents tires des documents
juges prioritaires par Ie Comite. Suite au deces soudain de notre collegue membre de Groupe,
l'honorable Donald Brenner, Ie 12 mars 2011, nous avons poursuivi notre travail et nous avons
demande it notre personnel de continuer leurs travaux de preparation d'autres documents pour
examen par Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres de f a ~ o n ace que ces documents puissent it leur tour
etre rendus publics des que Ie Groupe aura pris sa decision concernant les passages caviardes
qu'ils contiennent.
L

~ .
11\
-2
Notre lettre du 13 avril a egalement fait part de notre comprehension selon laquelle,
conformement a la loi qui regit Ie Parlement, la dissolution de la 40e legislature par
proclamation du Gouverneur general Ie 26 mars 2011 signifie que la Chambre qui avait adopte
1'ordonnance de production de documents sur les detenus afghans avait cesse d'exister, et que
ceux qui etaient membres de la Chambre n'avaient plus Ie statut de deputes du Parlement.
Consequemment, il n'y avait plus de Comite special de parlementaires auquel notre Groupe
pouvait presenter son rapport ainsi que Ie resultat de ses travaux ni deposer ses documents a la
Chambre. Bien que nous ayons note que Ie Protocole d'entente ait envisage que, sous certaines
conditions, il pourrait survivre a la dissolution du Parlement, il ne nous etait pas possible de
determiner si ces conditions pouvaient etre rencontrees avant que la Chambre ne soit
reconvoquee.
Nous avons fait etat du temps et des efforts considerables consacres a la realisation du mandat
de notre Groupe dans Ie cadre du Protocole d'entente. Nous avons considere que, dans ces
circonstances, i1 ne serait pas approprie que nous cessions nos travaux avant que Ie Groupe ne
termine ce qu'il s'etait engage a realiser envers Ie Comite special de parlementaires vers la mi
avril 2011. Nous avons, en consequence, informe Ie les signataires du Protocole d'entente que
no us avions l'intention de finaliser Ie rapport du Groupe d'experts-arbitres et la preparation des
documents qui devaient l'accompagner Ie ou vers Ie 15 avril. Cependant, vu Ia dissolution du
Comite auquel nous devions les transmettre dans Ie cadre du Protocole d'entente et
l'engagement de notre Groupe envers Ie Comite, nous conserverions ces informations en
attendant la convocation d'un nouveau Parlement et toute autre directive qui pourrait nous etre
donnee ace moment-lao Nous avons aussi indique que nous avions demande a notre personnel
de poursuivre leurs travaux preparatoires relatifs a d'autres documents qui no us avaient ete
transmis par Ie Comite, de maniere a ce que Ie Comite soit en mesure de prendre des decisions
concernant ces documents, devait-il eventuellement etre appele a Ie faire. Finalement, nous
avons mentionne que notre Groupe ne proposerait aucune mesure autre que celles figurant a
son rapport d'avriljusqu'a ce que son rOle futur, Ie cas echeant, ait ete clarifie.
Sauf pour une modification, nous avons procede tel qu'indique dans notre lettre du 13 avril. Ala
mi-avril, nous avons complete un rapport decrivant les travaux du Groupe d'experts-arbitres et
la methodologie suivie. Nous avons egalement, ala meme date, prepare sous une forme qui
pouvait etre tabIee, Ie resultat de notre examen d'une premiere serie de documents tires de ceux
juges prioritaires par Ie Comite. En ce qui concerne Ia modification susmentionnee, nous avons
aussi complete notre examen de documents additionneIs, aussi priorises par Ie Comite, et pris
des decisions a cet egard. Nous avons aussi considere opportun d'etre en mesure de
communiquer Ie resultat de notre examen de ces documents additionnels si nous devions
eventuellement etre appeles a Ie faire. Dans la prise de decisions concernant ces documents,
nous avons continue a appliquer la meme methodologie et approche decrite dans notre rapport
d'avril dernier. Nous n'avons pas entrepris l'examen des documents relatifs aux renseignements
confidentiels du Cabinet, n'ayant rec;u la confirmation des pretentions du gouvernement a cet
egard que peu de temps avant la dissolution du Parlement. Nous n' avons pas non plus termine
l'examen de toutes les pretentions du gouvernement concernant Ie secret professionnel avocat
client malgre que nous ayons ete en mesure de les examiner et de prendre des decisions a cet
egard concernant la plupart d'entre elles.
Apres l'ouverture de la 41e legislature, Ie gouvernement nous a avise qu'il etait peu probable que
Ie Protocole d'entente soit renouvele, mais que Ie gouvernement avait l'intention de deposer au
Parlement Ie rapport du Groupe d'experts-arbitres d'avril2011 ainsi que tous les documents
qu'il a examines. On nous a demande de vous transmettre a cette fin tant Ie rapport que les
documents que nous avons examines et au sujet desquels nous avons pris des decisions.

Conformement acette demande, nous annexons acette lettre les documents suivants:
(1) Ie rapport du Groupe d'experts-arbitres en date d'avriI2011 qui decrit son mandat, ses
travaux et la methodologie suivie;
(2) Ie resultat de notre examen et nos decisions eu egard aux 362 documents transmis par Ie
Comite, comprenant Ies documents juges prioritaires par Ie Comite ainsi que plusieurs
autres documents dont l'examen avait ete entrepris avant que Ie Comite ne les ait retires de
sa liste de priorites; et
(3) une liste decrivant nos decisions en ce qui concerne les pretentions du gouvernement
concernant Ie secret professionnel avo cat-client que nous avons examinees.
Puisque cette Iettre decrit nos activites depuis notre rapport d'avril dernier, Ie gouvernement
voudra peut-etre envisager de deposer cette lettre devant Ie Parlement avec la documentation y
jointe.
Nous comprenons qu' aucun travail additionnel n'est attendu du Groupe d'experts-arbitres.
Nous apprecions la confiance qu'on nous a demontre comme membres du Groupe d'experts
arbitres et nous avons ete honores d'avoir servi en cette qualite.
Sincerement votres,
~ . : ........
II
Claire L'Heureux-DuM Frank Iacobucci
jas
Pieces jointes
Confidential
Memorandum of Understanding
between
The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, Prime Minister
and
The Honourable Michael Ignatieff, Leader of the Official Opposition
and
Gilles Duceppe, Leader of the Bloc Quebecois
I. Recognizing that the House of Commons adopted an Order on
December 10, 2009 for the production of Government documents related to the
transfer of Afghan detainees from the Canadian Forces to Afghan authorities
which contain information the disclosure of which would be injurious to national
defence, international relations or national security ifpublicly released and which
made no provision for confidential treatment of the material.
II. Recognizing that the Speaker ofthe House of Commons, in his ruling of April 27,
2010, concluded that it is within the powers ofthe House of Commons to ask for
the documents sought in that Order and suggested that a mechanism be put in
place by which these documents could be made available to the House without
compromising the security and confidentiality ofthe information they contain.
III. Recognizing that the Speaker stated in his ruling that: "the House and the
government have, essentially, an unbroken record of some 140 years of
collaboration and accommodation in cases of this kind" and further that "The
House has long understood the role ofthe government as 'defender of the realm'
and its heavy responsibilities in matters of security, national defence and
international relations. Similarly, the government understands the House's
undoubted role as the 'grand inquest of the nation' and its need for complete and
accurate information in order to fulfil its duty of holding the government to
account."
IV. Recognizing that Cabinet confidences and information subject to solicitor-client
privilege are classes of information that the Parliament of Canada has long
recognized are sensitive and may require protection from disclosure.
Confidential
In order to comply with the Order of the House of Commons from December 10,2009,
and further to the Agreement in Principle reached by all parties on May 14, 20 I 0, the
parties agree as fol.lows:
1. An ad hoc committee of parliamentarians will be established external to the
House of Commons and consisting off. hiHW@.f itrilJ.g one Member of -t-
Parliament designated by the leaders of the governing party and each opposition 'S'\ j V\a...l 6 ( 'I
party with recognized status in the House of Commons. Each party may /
designate one alternate Member of Parliament who may act as a replacement of a
member of the ad hoc committee when that member is absent; no more than one ~
Member from each party can participate in the ad hoc committee at a given time. ~
2. The ad hoc committee will have access to all documents listed in the House Order
of December 10,2009 including all relevant documents related to the transfer of
Afghan detainees from the period 2001 to 2005 in order to understand the transfer
arrangements post-200S, pursuant to the following confidentiality measures:
a. access to the documents is conditional on each Member signing a
confidentiality undertaking and taking an oath of confidentiality, as
prescribed hereinafter;
b. each Member, before receiving access to documents, will obtain a security
clearance at the "Secret" level;
c. access to documents shall take place at a secure location under the control
of the Government of Canada, subject to the following security conditions
on access to, and the handling of, classified materials:
Members of the ad hoc committee will be required to provide
identification;
no staff of the Members are to be included;
no electronic, photographic, cellular or recording devices are
permitted;
no materials are to be removed from the designated location;
no copies of materials are permitted to be made;
no notes are permitted to be removed from the location at any time;
and
any notes made by Members of the ad hoc committee may only be
accessed by the author of those notes or his or her alternate and any
such notes shall be destroyed six months after the completion ofthe
review of documents;
d. the review of documents is to take place with all the procedural
protections normally accorded to in camera proceedings, including a ban
on the publication of the proceedings and on the disclosure, directly or
indirectly, of any information which is protected from disclosure; and
2
Confidential
e. any Member violating the confidentiality of the information will be
immediately expelled from the ad hoc committee by the Panel of Arbiters
established in paragraph 6, with no other Member of Parliament permitted
to be substituted in the place of that expelled Member.
3. In order to understand what information has been protected from disclosure for
the purpose of national security, nationa:t defence and international relations and
shall not be disclosed by Members, the Members will be provided access to
documents in both redacted and non-redacted form.
4. Any support required by the ad hoc committee will be provided by an ongoing
group of public servants with the appropriate security clearances and subject
matter expertise. The group of public servants, from the relevant departments,
will provide briefings and contextual information initially, and then as necessary,
to the ad hoc committee to assist Members in carrying out their work and to
understand the security implications and reasons for protecting certain
information from disclosure.
5. With respect to every document that has been redacted, the ad hoc committee will
determine whether the information therein is relevant to matters of importance to
Members of Parliament, particularly as it relates to the ongoing study on the
transfer of Afghan detainees currently under way at the House of Commons
Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan, and whether the use
of such information is necessary for the purpose of holding the government to
account. The decisions of the ad hoc committee related to relevance shall be final
and unreviewable.
6. Where the ad hoc committee determines that information is both relevant and
necessary, or upon the request of any Member ofthe ad hoc committee, it will
refer the disputed information to a Panel of Arbiters, who will determine how that
relevant and necessary information will be made available to Members of
Parliament and the public without compromising national security, national
defence or international relations either by redaction or the writing of
summaries or such techniques as the Panel may find appropriate, bearing in mind
the basic objective of maximizing disclosure and transparency. The Panel of
Arbiters should regularly consult with the Members of the ad hoc committee to
better understand what information the Members believe to be relevant and the
reason why. The decisions of the Panel of Arbiters with respect to disclosure
shall be final and unreviewable.
7. The Panel of Arbiters can determine, at the request of the government, that certain
information should not be disclosed due to the solicitor-client privilege. The
Panel of Arbiters, after consultation with the Clerk ofthe Privy Council, can also
determine, at the request of the government, that information constituting Cabinet
confidences should not be disclosed. In both such cases, the Panel of Arbiters
shall determine how information contained in the documents may be made
available to Members of Parliament and the public without compromising the
solicitor-client privilege or the principle of Cabinet confidentiality, by such
3
Confidential
techniques as the Panel may find appropriate, bearing in mind the basic objective
of maximizing disclosure and transparency. Should the Panel of Arbiters decide
that certain information should not be disclosed, the Panel will provide the
rationale for its decisions to the ad hoc committee.
8. The Panel of Arbiters will be composed of three eminent jurists, who shall have
judicial expertise. Composition ofthe P a ~ must be agreed upon by both the
Government and the Oppositions'j I").a. drle--s
9. The ad hoc committee may produce a report at the end of the review of
documents, outlining the methodology, practices and procedures used and
containing any recommendations for improvements to the process of review.
Should the ad hoc committee deem that circumstances warrant, it may also
produce an interim report at any time before the production ofa final report.
Before any report is finalized, it shall be submitted to the Panel of Arbiters for
decision regarding disclosure to ensure that the information in the report does not
compromise national security, national defence or international relations, taking
into consideration the factors outlined in paragraph 6.
10. This Memorandum of Understanding survives a dissolution of Parliament
provided that the leaders of the governing party and each opposition party with
recognized status in the House of Commons following a general election sign a
Memorandum in the same terms in the next Parliament.
11. Theiihlfti'liilartmt documents mentioned above will continue to be tabled in the ~
House of Commons as they become available. ~
12. Before receiving access to the aforementioned documents, each Member
(including alternates) shall take the following oath:
I, ...., swear (or solemnly affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true
loyalty to Canada and to its people, whose democratic beliefs I share, whose
rights and freedoms I respect and whose laws I will uphold and obey. I further
swear (or solemnly affirm) that I will not communicate or use without due
authority any information obtained in confidence during the review of
documentation.
13. Before receiving access to the aforementioned documents, each Member
(including alternates) shall sign the following binding undertaking of
confidentiality:
The House of Commons adopted an Order, on December 10,2009, for the
production of Government documents related to the transfer of Afghan detainees
from the Canadian Forces to Afghan authorities which contain information the
disclosure of which would be injurious to national defence, international relations
or national security if publicly released.
4
-------------------------
-----------------
Confidential
While Members of the House of Commons need to obtain the information that is
necessary to hold the Government to account, such disclosure must be balanced
by the Government's obligations to protect information, including information
that would be injurious to national defence, international relations or national
security if publicly released.
In recognition of the above concerns, I,
therefore undertake as follows:
I. I will take the prescribed oath before obtaining access to any confidential
information, which is defined as information that the Government of
Canada has identified as being protected from disclosure and that the
Panel of Arbiters has not determined can be disclosed without
compromising national security, national defence or international
relations.
2. I will obtain a security clearance at the "Secret" level before obtaining
access to the information described in paragraph I.
3. I will treat all information described in paragraph 1 as strictly confidential.
4. I will not use or communicate, directly or indirectly, any of the
information described in paragraph 1, including in parliamentary
proceedings, to any other individuals, including to other Members of
Parliament or to my staff.
5. I will take best efforts to ensure that there is no inadvertent disclosure of
the information described in paragraph 1.
6. I will not remove any of the documents that include information described
in paragraph 1 from a secure Government of Canada facility.
7. I will not make any copies of the information described in paragraph 1;
any notes will not be removed from the secure Government of Canada
facility and will be destroyed six months following the completion ofthe
review of documents.
8. I understand that this undertaking is a continuing obligation, which
survives the dissolution of this Parliament.
Date: Signature: ______~ __________
Memorandum of Understanding signed at Ottawa, Ontario, June ~ , 2 0 1 O
5
Confidential
For the Government of Canada: For the Opposition in the
House of Commons:

~ ~
Michael Ignatieff
6
Confidentiel
Protocole d'entente
entre
Ie tres honorable Stephen Harper, Premier ministre
et
I 'honorable Michael Ignatieff, chef de I 'Opposition officielle
et
Gilles Duceppe, chef du Bloc Quebecois
I. Reconnaissant que la Chambre des communes a adopte, Ie 10 decembre 2009, un
ordre portant production de documents gouvernementaux a propos du transfert
des detenus afghans par les Forces canadiennes aux autorites afghanes et que la
divulgation de certains renseignements conte nus dans ces documents porterait
prejudice a la defense nationaJe, aux relations internationales ou ala securite
nationale s'ils etaient rendus publics etant donne qu'aucune mesure de traitement
confidentiel de I' information n'a eM prevue.
II. Reconnaissant que Ie president de la Chambre des communes a conclu, dans sa
decision du 27 avril 2010, que la Chambre n'a pas outrepasse ses pouvoirs en
demandant les documents vises dans I' ordre et qu'il a suggere I'instauration d 'un
mecanisme par lequel ces documents pourraient etre mis a la disposition de la
Chambre sans compromettre la securite et la confidentialite des renseignements
qu'ils contiennent.
III. Reconnaissant que Ie president a declare, dans sa decision, que la realite est que
la Chambre et Ie gouvernement ont, essentiellement, un bilan enviable de quelque
140 ans de collaboration et d'accommodement dans les cas comme ce1ui-ci ,
ainsi que La Chambre comprend depuis longtemps Ie rOle de grand defenseur
du royaume du gouvernement et ses lourdes responsabilites en matiere de
securite, de defense nationale et de relations internationales. De meme, Ie
gouvernement comprend Ie role incontestable de grand enqueteur de Ia nation
de la Chambre des communes et reconnait qu'elle doH disposer de
renseignements complets et exacts pour s'acquitter de sa fonction de demander
des comptes au gouvernement.
IV. Reconnaissant que les renseignements confidentiels du Cabinet et les
rcnsdgnements proteges par Ie secret professionnel liant I 'avocat ason client sont
les categories de renseignements que Ie ParJement du Canada reconnait depuis
longtemps comme etant confidentielles et pouvant etre exemptees de divulgation.
Confidentiel
Afin que soit respecte I'ordre de la Chambre des communes du 10 decembre 2009 et
conformement aI'accord de principe conclu par toutes les parties Ie 14 mai 2010,
celles-ci ont convenu de ce qui suit: ol"_' #'
, .....)
1. un comite special de parlementaires sera forme. II externe ala Chambre des
communes et sera compose 9' '1watrlil J:ReJ:ReFe8, seit un depute designe par les
chefs du parti au pouvoir et des partis de l'oppositio reconnus ala Chambre des
communes. Chaque parti peut designer un depute qui pourra agir au
nom d'un membre du comite special quand ce dernier est absent. II n'y aura
jamais plus qu'un depute de chaque parti sur Ie comite special a tout moment.
2. Ie comite special aura acces ato us les documents figurant a l'ordre du 10
decembre 2009, y compris tous les documents pertinents sur Ie transfert des
detenus afghans de 2001 a2005, pour comprendre les ententes de transfert
conclues apres 2005, selon les mesures de confidentialite suivantes :
a. l'acces aux documents sera conditionnel ace que chaque membre signe un
engagement de non-divulgation et prete un serment de confidentialite,
comme prescrit ci-apres;
b. chaque membre, avant I' octroi du droit d'acces aux documents, doit
obtenir une habilitation de securite de niveau Secret ;
c. I'acces aux documents devra se faire en lieu sUr, sous la surveillance du
gouvernement du Canada, et sera soumis aux conditions de securite
suivantes concernant l'acces et Ie traitement de renseignements classifies:
les membres du comite special devront montrer une piece d'identite;
aucun membre du personnel des parlementaires ne sera admis;
les appareils electroniques et photographiques, les cellulaires et les
dispositifs d'enregistrement seront interdits;
aucun document ne pourra sortir du lieu designe;
il sera interdit de faire des copies des documents;
aucune note ne pourra jamais sortir du lieu designe;
toutes notes du comite special ne seront consultees que par leur auteur
ou son depute et toutes ces notes seront detruites six mois
apres la fin de la consultation des documents;
d. s'appliquent aIa consultation des documents toutes les protections
normalement accordees sur Ie plan de la procedure pour les deliberations a
huis c1os, y compris l'interdiction de publier Ie compte rendu des
deliberations et de divulguer, directement ou indirectement, tout
rcnseignement devant etre soustrait a Ia communication;
c. un membre qui vioicra les rcgles de confidentialite de I'information sera
immediatement expulse du comite special par Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres
constitue en vertu <.Iu paragraphe 6, sans possibilite de s'y faire remplacer
pur un autre depute.
2
Confidentiel
3. Afin de comprendre quels renseignements ont ete soustraits ala divulgation dans
l'interet de la securite nationale, de la defense nationale ou des relations
internationales et, par consequent, ne doivent pas etre divulgues, les membres
auront acces ala version caviardee et non caviardee des documents.
4. Tout soutien requis par Ie comite special sera fourni par un groupe de
fonctionnaires etabli sur une base continue et ayant les habilitations de securite et
les connaissances specialisees necessaires. Le groupe de fonctionnaires des
ministeres concernes tiendront, au depart et au besoin, des seances de breffage et
fourniront de l'information contextuelle au comite special pour permettre ases
membres de s'acquiuer de leur travail et de comprendre les raisons de soustraire
certains renseignements ala communication et les repercussions de celle-ci sur la
securite.
5. Le comite special determinera si I 'information dans chaque document ayant ete
caviarde est pertinente, eut egard aux sujets d'importance pour les deputes, en
particuJier si elle conceme l'etude sur Ie transfert des detenus afghans
actuellement menee par Ie Comite special de la Chambre des communes sur la
mission canadienne en Afghanistan, et si I 'utilisation de cette information est
necessaire dans Ie but de demander des comptes au gouvernement. Les decisions
du comite special concernant la pertinence seront definitives et echapperont au
controle j udiciaire.
6. Si Ie comite special estime que l'information est pertinente et necessaire, ou ala
demande d'un membre du comite special, iJ renverra celle-ci au Groupe
d'experts-arbitres, qui determinera la f a ~ o n dont seront communiques ces
renseignements aux deputes et au public sans compromettre la securite nationale,
la defense nationale ou les relations internationales, que ce soit la censure, la
redaction de resumes ou toute autre technique jugee appropriee, compte tenu des
objectifs fondamentaux visant amaxi miser la divulgation et la transparence. Le
Groupe d' experts-arbitres consultera regulierement les membres du comite special
afin de mieux comprendre quels renseignements les deputes estiment pertinents et
leurs justifications. Les decisions du Groupe concernant la divulgation seront
definitives et echapperont au controie judiciaire.
3
Contidentiel
7. Le Groupe d'experts-arbitres peut determiner, it [a demande du gouvernement,
que certains renseignements ne devraient pas etre divu[gues en raison du secret
professionnel qui lie I'avocat ason client. Apft!s avoir consulte Ie greffier du
Conseil prive, [e Groupe d'experts-arbitres peut egalement determiner, it la
demande du gouvernement, que l'information qui constitue des renseignements
confidentiels du Cabinet ne devrait pas etre divulguee. Dans les deux cas, Ie
Groupe d'experts-arbitres peut determiner comment communiquer aux membres
du Parlement et au public, aI'aide des moyens qu'it juge opportuns, I'information
contenue dans les documents sans compromettre Ie secret professionnelliant
l'avocat it son client, ni Ie principe de confidentialite du Cabinet et sans perdre de
vue que l'objectif est d'avoir la plus grande divulgation et la plus grande
transparence possibles.' Si Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres est d'avis que certains
renseignements ne devraient pas etre divulgues, Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres
fournira les raisons de sa decision au comite special.
8. Le Groupe d'experts-arbitres sera compose de troisjuristes eminents qui auront
I' expertise j udiciaire. Le gouvernement et 1 'opposition devront s' entendre sur sa .
composition. dL\.wCbttkk>
9. Le comite special peut produire un rapport it la fin de la consultation des
documents, lequel exposerait brievement la methodologie, les pratiques et les
procedures utili sees et contiendrait toute recommandation visant l'amelioration de " #,1
la procedure de revision. Le comite special peut aussi produire un rapport If
interimaire it tout moment avant la production du rapport final, si Ie comite special
est d'avis que les circonstances Ie justifient. Avant que tout rapport soit finalise,
celui-ci doit etre soumis au Groupe d'experts-arbitres afin qu'it rende une
decision sur la divulgation pour s'assurer que I'information incluse dans Ie
rapport ne compromette pas la securite nationale, la defense nationale, ou les
relations internationales, en prenant en consideration les facteurs identifies au
paragraphe 6.
10. Ce protocole d'entente demeurera en vigueur it la suite d'une dissolution du
Parlement it condition que les chefs du parti au pouvoir et des partis de
[' opposition reconnus it la Chambre des communes apres une election generale
signent un protocole libelle dans les memes termes au cours de la legislature
suivante.
11. Les documents got! i Cilltillttmtaux susmentionnes continueront d'etre deposes ala
Chambre des Communes lorsqu'i[s sont disponibles.
12. Avant d'obtenir l'acces aux documents susmentionmSs, chaque depute (et depute
rempia.yant) pretera Ie serment suivant :
Moi, ... ,jejure (ollj'aftirme solennellement) queje ferai preuve de
loyaute envers Ie Canada et son peuple, dont je partage les convictions
dcmocratiqucs, respccte les droits et libertes et observe les lois. Je jure (011
j'affirme solennellement) en outre qucje ne communiquerai ni n'utiliserai sans y
4
Confidentiel
avoir ete dument autorise(e) rien de ce qui parviendra a rna connaissance pendant
I' examen de la documentation.
13. Avant d'obtenir I'acces aux documents susmentionnes, chaque depute (et depute
signera un engagement obligatoire de non-divulgation formule
comme suit:
Le 10 decembre 2009, Ia Chambre des communes a adopte un ordre portant
production de documents gouvernementaux au sujet du transfert des detenus
afghans par les Forces canadiennes aux auto rites afghanes, qui contiennent des
informations qui, si e1les sont divulguees, porteraient prejudice aux relations
intemationales, it Ia defense nationale ou it Ia securite nationale.
Bien que Ies deputes de la Chambre des communes aient besoin de ces
renseignements pour demander des comptes au gouvernement, Ia divulgation doit
tenir compte de I'obligation du gouvernement de proteger l'information, y
compris I'information qui, si elle est communiquee, porterait prejudice aux
relations internationaIes, it la defense nationale ou it Ia securite nationaIe.
Compte tenu des preoccupations formulees precedemment, moi,
_____________, je m' engage done it proceder comme suit :
1. Je preterai Ie serment exige avant d'obtenir l'acces atout renseignement
confidentieI, c'est-a-dire que Ie gouvernement du Canada a soustrait a Ia
divuIgation et pour lesquels Ie Groupe d'experts-arbitres n'a pas permis Ia
divulgation sans nuire a Ia securite nationale, a Ia defense nationale ou aux:
relations internationales.
2. J' obtiendrai une habilitation de securite de niveau Secret avant d'avoir
acces aux renseignements decrits au paragraphe 1.
3. Je traiterai tous les renseignements decrits au paragraphe 1 comme
strictement confidentiels.
4. Je n'utiliserai ou ne communiquerai a quiconque, y compris les autres
deputes et mon personnel, directement ou indirectement, les
renseignements decrits au paragraphe 1, meme Iors de deliberations du
Parlement.
5. Je mettrai tout en reuvre pour qu'aucun renseignement decrit au
paragraphe 1 ne soit divulgue par megarde.
6. Je ne sortirai en allcun cas les documents qui renferment des
renseignements decrits au paragraphe 1 d'un etablissement securise du
gouvernement du Canada.
7. Je ne copierai I'information decrite au paragraphe l. Aucune note ne
pourrajamais sortir du lieu dcsigne et to utes notes dll comite special
5
---
Confidentiel
doivent etre detruites six mois suivant la fin de la consultation des
documents.
8. Je suis conscient(e) que cet engagement est permanent et survit ala
dissolution du Parlement.
Date:
Signature: __________
Protocole d'entente signe aOttawa, en Ontario, Ie J.juin 2010
Pour les partis de I' opposition
ala Chambre des communes
Pour Ie gouvernement du Canada
( L ' ~ \0
Michael Ignatieff
Gilles Duceppe
6
4/29: PRT notified the ICRC and AIHRC in Kandahar that they were
informed of alleged abuse by two prisoners at the NDS detention
facility in Kandahar City during the GoC visit on Apr. 25. PRT
also informed the NDS and the Governor that these are serious
complaints without identifying the complainants or providing
other specifics.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
3.
2.
1.
4/26: MINA raised detainee issue at NATO PM Meeting in Oslo (in
plenary and bilateral meetings).
4/26: Gen Grant, PRT/Buchan, AIHRC/Noorzai and NDS/Qayum met to
discuss future cooperation and secure AIHRC access to NDS
facilities in Kandahar.
4/25: Kabul demarched NDS/Saleh to [Canada's position on allegations
of detainee mistreatment and the role of the AIHRC were discussed.]
4/25: Kabul demarched Karzai Chief of Staff Daoudzai to [Canada's position on allegations
of detainee mistreatment and the role of the AIHRC were discussed.] and discuss a
possible way forward.
4/25: MINA demarched Ambassador Samad [The role of the AIHRC was discussed.]
4/25: General Grant met with NDS Kandahar Director Qayum to
discuss the allegations and AIHRC access to NDS facilities.
4/25: IFM/FTAG demarched Afghan Ambassador to Canada Samad (with respect
to the AIHRC).
4/25: MINA called Afghanistan's National Security Advisor Rassoul
[The AIHRC's mandate and independence was discussed.]
4/24: Kabul demarched NDS/ (Head of Liaison and
Protocol) [Canada's position on allegations of mistreatment was discussed.]
4/24: PRT/Buchan demarched Governor Khalid [Access to NDS
facilities was discussed.]
4/24: BNATO Ambassador Juneau indicated during the informal
coffee of PermReps hosted by the NATO Secretary-General that
[Support for the issue was expressed
by a number of international parties.]
14.
15
Pending
Senior Canadian military and civilian officials in Kandahar to speak
with the Governor and NDS on safety of journalists and sources.
4/23: Kabul demarched AIHRC/Langari (one of their nine commissioners) on their lack
of access to NDS facilities in Kandahar.
4/23: DMA demarched Ambassador Samad [AIHRC access was discussed.]
Other Action
1. 4/25: DFAIT/CSC/JAG visit to the NDS detention facility in Kandahar
City.
Apr
Apr
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
PERS WERE
AND HAS REQUESTED
(a Canadian
facility.)
Jul
Jul
Jul
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
remaining
ONE
detainees (fewer than 20)
individuals
(fewer than 5 people) (fewer than 10 people)
the ICRC
(fewer
than 20)
[The fact that many detainees do not go through a Canadian detention facility was discussed.]
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
names names
(fewer than 10)
as well as reasons for AIHRC's decreasing involvement in Transitional Justice issues.]
[Issues of capacity were discussed,
the AIHRC do not have the same problem in other provinces;
(although there are sometimes issues locating detainees.)
[NDS' cooperation and constitutional
obligations were discussed.]
[Issues with AIHRC's access to NDS detention facilities in Kandahar
[The need for local solutions to the issue was discussed.]

[Issues with AIHRC access to Kandahar detention facilities
facilities due to specific authorization requirements were discussed. Canada was later notified of this issue.]
[New authorization requirements for access and one reason for these changes were discussed.]
were discussed.]
[An opinion was expressed that the issue of access is limited to NDS.]
Director Quayum
Director
(a high level Afghan
official)
[Awareness of detainee mistreatment, the existence of similar allegations of mistreatment, and level of concern over the
allegations were discussed.]
including perceptions thereof.]
[Potential implications for support of the Afghan mission were discussed.]
[Future meetings and briefings on the allegations were discussed.]
[Alternatives to the likely responses were discussed.]
[Information received from NATO in the wake of the allegations was discussed. NATO's
position on the allegations was discussed, along with proposed response.]
We mentioned that we had met earlier today with NDS chief Saleh, who is ready to make a statement. We suggested
however that, given its importance for Canada, [Possible responses by the Afghan government were discussed,
Comment:
[Likely responses by the Afghan government were discussed.]
[Information received from NATO in the wake of the allegations was discussed. NATO's position on
the allegations was discussed, along with proposed response.]
At the same time, we would note
allegations made in the Globe & Mail.
Canada takes these allegations very seriously.
Such practices would constitute a violation of Afghanistan's international obligations, as well as Afghan domestic
law.
We call on the Government of Afghanistan to investigate these specific allegations, in particular the allegations
that this is a systemic practice at NDS facilities, ensure that any abuse cease immediately, and that corrective
measures be taken.
We also reiterate the legitimate role of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission with regard to
monitoring the treatment of detainees and providing immediate notice should it learn that a detainee transferred
by the Canadian Forces to Afghan Authorities has been mistreated.
Such abuses would run counter to the fundamental principles which the Government of Afghanistan and your
international partners are working together to uphold.
[Suggestions about dealing with
the allegations of mistreatment and AIHRC's access to NDS facilities were discussed.]
Comment:
[A possible demarche was discussed, along with the likely consequences of the demarche.]
the
[The need for access by the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission was raised as an issue.]
(An international representative) phoned to express their interest in/concern about the detainee
issue, which could have broader implications for
[Canada's position on the allegations of mistreatment, Afghan international obligations and
domestic law, and proposed reaction to the allegations were discussed.]
if we pushed strongly,
detainee policy.
head of liaison and protocol
ICRC has access every month to the NDS
facilities in Kandahar.
[A potential response by the NDS was discussed].
[Another potential response was discussed.]
(fewer than 150)
(relating to monitoring detainees.)
Canada takes these allegations very seriously.
Such practices would constitute a violation of Afghanistan's international obligations, as well as Afghan domestic law.
We call on the Government of Afghanistan to investigate these specific allegations, in particular the allegations that
this is a systemic practice at NDS facilities, ensure that any abuse cease immediately, and that corrective measures be
taken.
We also reiterate the legitimate role of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission with regard to monitoring
the treatment of detainees and providing immediate notice should it learn that a detainee transferred by the Canadian
Forces to Afghan Authorities has been mistreated.
Such abuses would run counter to the fundamental principles which the Government of Afghanistan and your
international partners are working together to uphold.
[Suggestions about dealing
with the allegations of mistreatment and AIHRC's access to NDS facilities were discussed.]
[The need
for access by the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission was raised as an issue.]
head of liaison and protocol
(An international representative)
at the highest level today as soon as possible - within the next hour and a
half if possible. Please advise once demarches are delivered.
phoned to express their interest in/concern about the detainee issue,
which could have broader implications for detainee policy.
4. With respect to the physical conditions of detention in Afghanistan, IFM commented on the
challenge for the international community to support the (re)construction of prison facilities as
part of a regular development assistance program. In this context, she explained that
Canada had recently deployed a Corrections Services Canada expert to review the Afghan
corrections situation in southern Afghanistan, and to identify recommendations from that
review for Canada to further build Afghan capacity, including infrastructure improvements if
required.
IFM acknowledged Canada's residual responsibility for the detainees and advised that Canada
was aware of the principle of non-refoulement but within the context of refugee law and
movement of people across borders. In this context, Canada has obtained assurances from
the government of Afghanistan that persons transferred by the Canadian Forces would not be
subject to torture or to the death penalty.
Comment
discussions highlighted the need for Canada to:
follow up on the issue of procedural safeguards for internment and administrative
detentions,
follow up on the treatment of detainees by the NDS and ANP, as well as conditions of
detention facilities;
continue the work initiated by DND with DFAIT regarding the transfer and treatment of
detainees in Afghanistan
[Issues with AIHRC access to Kandahar detention
facilities due to specific authorization requirements were discussed. Canada was later notified of this issue.]
[Allegations of detainee abuse and proposed means of addressing this issue are discussed.]
I spoke today to
colleagues in Afghanistan, that CSIS officers only speak to detainees before/before they are
In answer to questions posed in reftel
advises, after double checking with
CSIS
transferred to NDS. They do not/not see detainees after they are in NDS custody. They therefore have not witnessed any
abuse of detainees by NDS and are not aware of any abuse.
added that CSIS officers, for their part, go out of their way on a regular basis to make it clear to NDS authorities
3. At first opportunity, will verify with CSIS any knowledge of the presence of Cdns
during questioning of detainees and witnessing of any abuse.
2.
[The relationship between CSIS and the NDS was discussed.]
Verify with your CSIS colleagues
their knowledge of the presence of Canadians during questioning of
detainees by NDS officials and specifically, if they have witnessed any abuse by NDS of detainees.
CSIS is currently on leave and won't return until the middle of next week (checking on the precise day).
If you require information before then, we can reach him through our to request his comments via C-4
or to you directly via secure telephone. Please advise.
We have just been handed
report We have been told
it reflects The report advises
advised that the Government of Canada has
As you know, we are working to arrange a call
between Minister MacKay and President Karzai to deliver the same message.
assurances have
been received
[The source through which Canada
obtained the report was mentioned.]
(the views of a certain
NDS official.)
[The contents of the report were discussed. The report was said to outline the NDS's
proposed response to AIHRC suggestions that the NDS mistreats detainees, as reported in the media.]
[Canada's position on the course
of action outlined in the report was stated.]
(from sources within the Government of Afghanistan regarding whether or not the proposed course of action
would be followed.)
We would be grateful that Kabul also deliver immediately, as per our call, a demarche at the highest levels:
[Canada's position on the course of action outlined in the report was stated, including its position on
Afghanistan's international obligations.]
We
have
(a senior official of)
(on a frequent basis)
[Confirmation of the senior official's statements was sought.]
(The senior official)
(interpersonal issues)
(spent fewer than 2 months)
(senior official)
July
August October
January
real or
imagined
Graeme Smith phoned half an hour ago to convey his concerns that he and/or his staff may be at risk from Governor
Smith says he is particularly concerned about his two Afghan staff.
[Concerns were raised and next steps were discussed. It was suggested that it be conveyed that Canada would be monitoring
the welfare of Canadian journalists and their staffs.]
Comment:
As discussed some weeks ago with PRT, this is not the first time we have heard reports of Asadullah
personally torturing detainees at private detention facilities. We are also aware of cases where he has made threats
against Kandaharis [Other unsubstantiated allegations were noted.]
Asadullah Khalid. Smith has heard reports that
ARCS and its potential capacity to monitor.
Summary: The Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) yesterday called a meeting of nations with
which it has a detainee-monitoring arrangement to request our support for accessing National Directorate of Security
detention facilities. According to AIHRC, access is still a problem in Kandahar; they have documented five failed attempts
to access Kandahar NDS facilities in 2007. AIHRC would like to enter into a 'tripartite' arrangment - GoA, the
international community and itself - that would confirm its right to monitor and visit detainees. AIHRC chair Dr. Sima
Samar said The UK pitched
its proposal to set up a tracking system for detainees
and for which it is requesting Cdn
support. HOM met separately with AIHRC and assured Dr. Samar that we would test our current arrangement -
and AIHRC access in Kandahar - as soon as possible.
Report: Further to their announcement at the Human Rights Forum (report to follow), the Afghanistan Independent
Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) yesterday called a meeting of nations with which AIHRC has a detainee-monitoring
arrangement. The purpose of the meeting was to update us on AIHRC's problems with the National Directorate of Security
(NDS), and to request our assistance in improving access to NDS facilities. Representing the AIHRC were chair
Dr. Sima Samar, her deputy
and commissioners Canadian,
UK and Dutch embassies participated, as did the EU Special Representative's office. Norway was invited but could not
attend. [Comment: AIHRC currently has
3. AIHRC monitoring of NDS facilities. The attached PowerPoint slides, presented by AIHRC at the meeting, lists five
failed attempts by the AIHRC to access the Kandahar NDS detention facility - on 7 Feb, 19 Feb. 12 March, 20 March and
15 April 2007. Access was blocked despite a January 2007 letter by NDS assuring access to AIHRC, as well as the
AIHRC's own law, which grants access.
a reference to the secret law of 1978,
4. Dr. Samar noted that she had discussed the access problem with President Karzai, who arranged a meeting with Saleh
at the presidential palace on 18 April in an attempt to address the situation.
(Dr. Samar was out of the country).
the Globe article was not entirely correct -- in fact,
[Comment: We understand that
after the article came out, in both Kabul and Kandahar
following that conversation, NDS provided access to their Kandahar facility on 29 April.
(and
another ISAF member's)
(It was reported that)
[Allegations against Governor Khalid were discussed.]
[The states with which AIHRC has detainee-monitoring
arrangements were named.]
[The NDS's position regarding the access issue was reported on.]
[The relationship between the secret law and current activities was discussed.]
[An assessment of the result of this meeting was given.]
[Communications between the NDS and AIHRC regarding the Globe &
Mail article were discussed, including the NDS's proposed response to the allegations in the article. Internal discussions within the
AIHRC regarding the article were also
discussed.]
[The results of internal discussions within the AIHRC
regarding the Globe & Mail article were discussed. It was suggested that what was presented as direct knowledge of
torture had been misconstrued.]
[Interaction between an AIHRC official and
authorities was discussed.]
[The level
after the first Globe & Mail article by Graeme Smith appeared,
7. AIHRC also briefed us on access issues to the NDS detention facility in Kabul. On 30 April, they were not allowed
access. On 1 May, they returned again; they were allowed in
8.
9.
10. Access to other facilities
12.
14.
also suggested that, to complement a 'tripartite' MoU, a follow-up mechanism be established - for example, a
monthly meeting between all parties, where issues could be discussed and resolved.
15.
16.
17.
18.
of unsupervised access provided to AIHRC was discussed.]
[Communication between the
AIHRC and NDS was discussed.]
[The level of unsupervised access
provided to AIHRC was discussed.]
[The position of one ISAF state regarding access problems was stated. The opinion was expressed that the denial of
access constituted a breach of obligations and that a solution should be reached before the problem became public in
domestic media.]
[The effect of AIHRC's detainee-monitoring agreements on access to detainees was discussed. The level of access to
ISAF-captured detainees relative to Afghan-captured detainees was commented on.]
[Comparative levels of access to NDS facilities in various regions were
discussed.]
[ICRC access to NDS facilities was discussed.]
[Concern was expressed regarding the likely effectiveness of such a letter.]
[Support for the letter arrangement by certain ISAF states was discussed. Logistics of the arrangement were discussed.
Potential signatory agencies within the Government of Afghanistan were discussed.]
[A reported admission by Governor Khalid regarding a private detainee facility were discussed. It was also reported that the
lives of detainees held at the facility had been threatened.]
[A proposed detainee tracking system was discussed. The views of the AIHRC on this proposal were discussed. Current
tracking problems, including misinformation as to whether a detainee has been released were discussed. NDS capacity was
discussed.]
[The result of discussions regarding the proposed tracking system was reported. The disparity in
approach between ISAF-captured detainees and Afghan-captured
11. The commissioners agreed that there is no problem accessing Ministry of Justice (MoJ) facilities; the MoJ is open to
dialogue and AIHRC suggestions. Access to Afghan National Police detention facilities is also not usually a problem,
although contacting Ministry of Interior officials when an urgent case needs attention can be difficult.
NDS tracking system: UK proposal.
19.
detainees was discussed.]
[Implementation of the proposed tracking system, including funding, was discussed. Political support
and a proposed joint demarche by several ISAF states was discussed.]
Cdn reps agreed to meet separately to discuss the proposal.
L
a
s
t
n
a
m
e
F
i
r
s
t
n
a
m
e
F
a
t
h
e
r
'
s
n
a
m
e
G
r
a
n
d
f
a
t
h
e
r
'
s
n
a
m
e
S
e
x
A
g
e
P
l
a
c
e
o
f
b
i
r
t
h
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
T
r
i
b
e
o
r
r
e
g
i
o
n
I
D
n
u
m
b
e
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
U
n
i
j
u
r
e
d
U
n
i
j
u
r
e
d
U
n
i
j
u
r
e
d
U
n
i
j
u
r
e
d
w
o
u
n
d
w
o
u
n
d
s
o
f
a
s
e
r
i
o
u
s
n
a
t
u
r
e
.
w
o
u
n
d
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
w
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
v
i
a
A
N
A
a
m
b
u
l
a
n
c
e
c
o
n
t
u
s
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
u
s
i
o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
f
i
t
c
o
n
t
u
s
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
A
N
P
U
S
U
S
A
N
A
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
M
a
y
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
(
M
i
n
o
r
,
a
g
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
d
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

a
t

K
A
F

u
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e

a
n
d

u
n
c
o
n
s
c
i
o
u
s
n
o
w
c
o
n
s
c
i
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
t
i
l
l
b
e
i
n
g
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
.
G
o
o
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
W
o
u
n
d
e
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
o
f
h
e
a
l
t
h
o
r
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
F
i
t
:
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
D
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
c
a
r
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
t
o
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
o
f
h
e
a
l
t
h
o
r
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
F
i
t
i
n
j
u
r
y
D
e
c
e
a
s
e
d
J
u
l
y
N
D
S
N
D
S
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
N
D
S
F
a
m
i
l
y
A
N
A
J
u
n
-
0
6
N
/
A
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
H
e
a
l
t
h
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
.
s
o
f
t
t
r
a
u
m
a
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
-
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
b
y
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
N
D
S
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
D
S
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
/
f
i
t
f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
f
i
t
f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
/
f
i
t
f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
,
w
i
t
h
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
w
i
t
h
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
w
i
t
h
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
/
F
i
t
f
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
w
o
u
n
d
D
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
w
a
s
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
e
r
e
d
f
i
r
s
t
a
i
d
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
,
a
g
e
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
/
F
i
t
f
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
C
l
e
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
C
l
e
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
c
a
r
e
w
o
u
n
d
G
i
v
e
n
m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
U
N
K
N
o
v
-
0
6
? N
o
v
-
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
(
G
o
o
d
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
I
n
j
u
r
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
a
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
i
n
j
u
r
y
(
M
i
n
o
r
)
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
H
e
a
l
t
h
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
o
o
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
N
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
[
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
I
n
j
u
r
y
]
(
o
l
d
i
n
j
u
r
y
)
N
o
b
r
u
i
s
i
n
g
,
n
o
r
e
c
e
n
t
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
b
r
u
i
s
i
n
g
,
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
.
w
o
u
n
d
F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
m
e
m
b
e
r
w
a
s
a
m
b
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
a
n
d
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
t
o
r
e
t
u
r
n
t
o
h
i
s
h
o
m
e
.
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
t
o
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:
F
i
t
-
w
o
u
n
d
F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
t
o
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
.
n
o
b
r
u
i
s
e
s
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
o
r
b
r
u
i
s
e
s
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
o
r
b
r
u
i
s
e
s
n
o
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
o
r
b
r
u
i
s
e
s
D
a
t
e
o
f
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
A
I
H
R
C
C
o
n
f
i
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
V
i
s
i
t
e
d
o
n
I
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
e
d
(
Y
/
N
)
S
t
a
t
u
s
(
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
/
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
/
P
r
o
c
e
d
i
n
g
s
)
D
a
t
e
M
a
y
0
6
M
a
y
0
6
M
a
y
0
6
M
a
y
0
6
M
a
y
0
6
M
a
y
0
6
M
a
y
0
6
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
n
J
u
n
e
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
f
c
a
p
t
u
r
e
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
0
6
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
J
u
l
y
.
I
C
R
C
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
J
u
l
y
.
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
.
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
n
J
u
l
.
A
u
g
u
s
t
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
0
6
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
n
J
u
n
e
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
0
6
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
U
p
d
a
t
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
G
E
N
E
V
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
.
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
.
G
E
N
E
V
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
.
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
f
c
a
p
t
u
r
e
o
n
J
u
l
y
.
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
o
n
J
u
l
.
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
-
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
-
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
-
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
-
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
-
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
A
u
g
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
O
c
t
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
D
e
c
D
e
c
D
e
c
D
e
c
D
e
c
D
e
c
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
O
c
t
O
c
t
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
D
e
c
D
e
c
0
6
D
e
c
0
6
D
e
c
0
6
D
e
c
0
6
D
e
c
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
D
e
c
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
D
e
c
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
D
e
c
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
D
e
c
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
6
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
J
a
n
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
o
n
F
e
b
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
?
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
?
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
?
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
0
7
G
E
N
E
V
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
o
n

S
e
p

0
5
.
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
o
n
S
e
p
t
o
U
S
,
w
h
o
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
o
n

S
e
p

0
5
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
u
n
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
D
a
t
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
f
i
r
m
e
d
N
o
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
a
k
e
n
o
n
s
a
i
d
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
a
n
d
n
o
p
a
p
e
r
w
o
r
k
N
o
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
a
k
e
n
o
n
s
a
i
d
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
a
n
d
n
o
p
a
p
e
r
w
o
r
k
N
o
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
p
a
s
s
t
o
I
C
R
C
.
N
o
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
p
a
s
s
t
o
I
C
R
C
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
G
E
N
E
V
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
:
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
c
u
s
t
o
d
y
o
f
t
h
e
N
D
S
o
n
J
u
l
y
A
l
l
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
.
f
o
u
n
d
u
n
c
o
n
s
c
i
o
u
s
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
m
i
n
i
m
a
l
v
i
t
a
l
s
i
g
n
s
.
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
l
y
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
s
u
c
c
u
m
b
e
d
t
o
h
i
s
i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
d
i
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
b
y
N
D
S
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
h
i
s
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
n
d
n
o
t
i
f
y
N
O
K
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
e
n
s
u
r
e
b
u
r
i
a
l
/
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
'
s
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
b
e
l
i
e
f
s
.
F
i
r
s
t
n
a
m
e
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
N
D
S
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6
N
D
S
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6
N
D
S
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

J
u
l
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6
N
D
S
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

u
n
k
n
o
w
n
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
L
a
s
t

n
a
m
e
F
a
t
h
e
r
'
D
a
t
e

o
f

G
r
a
n
d
f
a
t
h
e
r
S
e
x
A
g
e
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
T
r
i
b
e
o
r
r
e
g
i
o
n
I
D
n
u
m
b
e
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

P
l
a
c
e
o
f

A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g

A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g

A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g

A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g

A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

f
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t

A
u
g
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

f
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t

S
e
p
-
0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
/
f
i
t

f
o
r

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

f
i
t

f
o
r

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
/
f
i
t

f
o
r

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6
N
D
S

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t

0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6
A
N
P

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c
[
T
h
e

g
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

w
a
s

d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
,

i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
.

T
h
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
a
r
e

r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

w
a
s

d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
,

i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

d
a
i
l
y

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

o
f

d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
s
.
]
[
T
h
e

g
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

w
a
s

d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
,

i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

a

w
o
u
n
d

t
h
e

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

h
a
d

s
u
s
t
a
i
n
e
d
.

T
h
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
a
r
e

r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l

w
a
s

d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
,

i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

m
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d

a
n
d

i
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s

t
o

f
i
n
i
s
h

t
h
e

p
r
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

c
h
a
n
g
e

t
h
e

d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g

d
a
i
l
y
.
]
[
A
g
e

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

t
h
a
t

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

i
s

a

m
i
n
o
r
.
]
[
A
g
e

i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s

t
h
a
t

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

i
s

a

m
i
n
o
r
.
]

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

(
G
o
o
d
)
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n
[
A
g
e
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
i
s
a
m
i
n
o
r
]

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

A
p
r
-
0
7

A
p
r
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
r
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7

M
a
r
-
0
7
(
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

t
o

a

h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
)

M
a
y
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

H
e
a
l
t
h
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

N
o

b
r
u
i
s
i
n
g

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
.

[
O
t
h
e
r

f
i
n
d
i
n
g
s

o
f

a

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

e
x
a
m

w
e
r
e

r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o
.
]
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
p
r
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
p
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

P
e
r
s
o
n

r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

f
r
o
m

(
a
n

A
f
g
h
a
n

o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

w
i
t
h

a

w
o
u
n
d
.
)

F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t

b
y

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
,

m
e
m
b
e
r

w
a
s

a
m
b
u
l
a
t
o
r
y

a
n
d

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

t
o

r
e
t
u
r
n

t
o

h
i
s

h
o
m
e
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
p
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

-

n
o

b
r
u
i
s
e
s
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

-

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

b
r
u
i
s
e
s
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

P
e
r
s
o
n

r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

f
r
o
m

(
a
n

A
f
g
h
a
n

o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

w
i
t
h

a

w
o
u
n
d
.
)

F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t

b
y

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
,

m
e
m
b
e
r

w
a
s

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

t
o

(
a

h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
.
)

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7

M
a
y
-
0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

-

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

b
r
u
i
s
e
s
.

(
P
e
r
s
o
n

w
a
s

g
i
v
e
n

s
u
p
p
l
y

o
f

m
e
d
i
c
i
n
e

f
o
r

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
.
)
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

-

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

b
r
u
i
s
e
s
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
:

N
o

b
r
u
i
s
e
s

o
r

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
y

0
7

b
y

K
A
F

P
O
L
A
D
C
o
n
f
i
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
D
a
t
e

o
f
C
o
n
f
i
r
m
a
t
i
o
S
t
a
t
u
s

(
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
/
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
/
P
r
o
c
e
d
i
n
g
s
U
n
i
t
D
a
t
e
I
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
e
d
V
i
s
i
t
e
d

o
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

G
o
A

O
c
t

0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e

t
o

G
o
A

A
p
r
i
l

0
5
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

G
o
A

O
c
t

0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

M
a
y

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

a
n
o
t
h
e
r

c
o
u
n
t
r
y
'
s

v
i
e
w

a
s

t
o

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

a
n
o
t
h
e
r

c
o
u
n
t
r
y
'
s

v
i
e
w

a
s

t
o

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

a
n
o
t
h
e
r

c
o
u
n
t
r
y
'
s

v
i
e
w

a
s

t
o

t
h
e

d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

b
e
t
w
e
e
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
]
H
e

w
a
s

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

N
D
S

f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g

h
i
s

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
.
R
e
l
e
a
s
e

t
o

G
o
A

A
p
r
i
l

0
5
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

w
h
e
t
h
e
r

a
n
o
t
h
e
r

c
o
u
n
t
r
y

c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
a
t
h
r
e
a
t
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

o
f
t
h
e
d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
u
g

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

S
e
p
t

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

S
e
p
t

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

S
e
p
t

2
0
0
6
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

a
n
d

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

o
f

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

o
f

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c

0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

N
o
v
.

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

N
o
v
.

2
0
0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

N
o
v
.

2
0
0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c

0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

N
o
v
.

2
0
0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

D
e
c

0
6
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

N
o
v
.

2
0
0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
r

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

J
a
n

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

M
a
r
c
h

2
0
0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
r

0
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
n

M
a
r

0
7
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

a
n
d

p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

o
f

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
I
t

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

N
D
S

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

a
r
r
e
s
t

a
s

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7

a
n
d

C
F

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

c
a
p
t
u
r
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

a
s

J
a
n
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7
.
]
[
I
t

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

N
D
S

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

a
r
r
e
s
t

a
s

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7

a
n
d

C
F

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

c
a
p
t
u
r
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

a
s

J
a
n
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7
.
]
[
I
t

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

N
D
S

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

a
r
r
e
s
t

a
s

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7

a
n
d

C
F

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

c
a
p
t
u
r
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

a
s

J
a
n
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7
.
]
[
I
t

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

N
D
S

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

a
r
r
e
s
t

a
s

F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7

a
n
d

C
F

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e

o
f

c
a
p
t
u
r
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

a
s

J
a
n
u
a
r
y

2
0
0
7
.
]
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
p
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
p
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
p
r
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y

G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y
N
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d

M
a
y
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

N
D
S

K
a
b
u
l

t
h
e
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
.

R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

N
D
S

K
a
b
u
l

t
h
e
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d
.

R
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

b
y

N
D
S

A
p
r
i
l

2
0
0
7
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
I
H
R
C
n
o
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y
N
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d

M
a
y
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y
N
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d

M
a
y
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

M
a
y
N
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d

M
a
y
L
a
s
t

n
a
m
e
F
i
r
s
t

n
a
m
e
S
t
a
t
u
s

(
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
/
R
e
l
e
a
s
e
/
P
r
o
c
e
d
i
n
g
s
)
D
a
t
e
U
n
i
t
-

-
M
a
y
-
0
6
-

-
M
a
y
-
0
6
-

-
M
a
y
-
0
6
-
-
M
a
y
-
0
6
U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S

U
S
A
N
P
A
N
A
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

A
N
P

N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6
N
D
S

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6
A
N
P

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
N
D
S

M
a
y
-
0
6

M
a
y
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
N
D
S

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
N
D
S

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
A
N
A

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
F
a
m
i
l
y

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
A
N
P

J
u
n
-
0
6

J
u
n
-
0
6
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l

J
u
l
-
0
6
N
/
A

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6
N
D
S

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P
D
e
c
e
a
s
e
d

i
n

C
a
n
a
d
i
a
n

C
u
s
t
o
d
y
m
e
d
i
c
a
l

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

J
u
l
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

A
u
g
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

S
e
p
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

O
c
t
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

N
D
S

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

F
e
b
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

N
o
v
-
0
6

U
N
K

N
o
v
-
0
6
?

F
e
b
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

J
a
n
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S

F
e
b
-
0
7

F
e
b
-
0
7
N
D
S
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

N
D
S
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

N
D
S
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
N
D
S
F
e
b
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

N
D
S
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

S
a
r
p
o
z
a

P
r
i
s
o
n
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
[
A
n

a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e

s
p
e
l
l
i
n
g

o
f

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

w
a
s

d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
.

T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

i
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
0
5

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d
.
]
[
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

i
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

t
o

a
n
o
t
h
e
r

c
o
u
n
t
r
y

w
h
o

i
n

t
u
r
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
d

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d
.
]
[
A
n

a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e

s
p
e
l
l
i
n
g

o
f

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

w
a
s

c
o
m
m
e
n
t
e
d

o
n

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

i
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
0
5

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d
.
]

[
A

c
o
m
m
e
n
t

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

w
a
s

m
a
d
e
.
]
[
A

c
o
m
m
e
n
t

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

w
a
s

m
a
d
e
.
]
H
e

h
a
s

n
o
t

b
e
e
n

a
s
k
e
d

f
o
r

t
h
e

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

t
h
a
t

w
e

w
o
u
l
d

n
o
r
m
a
l
l
y

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d

t
o

t
h
e

1
C
R
C

a
s

h
e

i
s

s
t
i
l
l

u
n
d
e
r

g
o
i
n
g

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
a
r
e
.

O
n
c
e

h
e

i
s

m
e
d
i
c
a
l
l
y

f
i
t

a
n
d
a
b
l
e
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d
,
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
s
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
I
C
R
C
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
G
E
N
E
V
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
:

T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

t
h
e

A
l
l

p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

u
n
k
n
o
w
n
.

D
u
r
i
n
g

a

m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

o
n

J
u
l

,

t
h
i
s

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

w
a
s

f
o
u
n
d

b
y

C
F

p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l

u
n
c
o
n
s
c
i
o
u
s

a
n
d

w
i
t
h

m
i
n
i
m
a
l

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y

f
o
r

h
i
s

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
.

H
e

s
u
c
c
u
m
b
e
d

t
o

h
i
s

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

a
n
d

d
i
e
d

o
n

v
i
t
a
l

s
i
g
n
s
.

H
e

w
a
s

b
r
o
u
g
h
t

t
o

K
A
F

a
n
d

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
l
y

t
r
e
a
t
e
d

a
t

t
h
e

J
u
l

.

D
e
s
p
i
t
e

h
a
v
i
n
g

n
o

p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l

i
n
f
o
r
m
a
[
T
h
e

d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y

b
y

l
o
c
a
l
s

o
f

a
n

u
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

w
h
o

w
a
s

a
t

a

M
e
d
i
c
a
l

F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y

i
n

K
A
F

a
n
d

s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
l
y

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

t
o

t
h
e

G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t

o
f

A
f
g
h
a
n
i
s
t
a
n

w
a
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e

o
f

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

o
f

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
T
h
e

d
e
l
a
y

f
o
r

t
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

w
a
s

e
x
p
l
a
i
n
e
d
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

a
b
o
u
t

t
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

o
f

a
n
d

p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

o
f

a

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
I
t

w
a
s

n
o
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

N
D
S

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
y

o
f

a
r
r
e
s
t

i
n

N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
0
6

a
n
d

C
F

r
e
p
o
r
t
s

d
a
t
e
s

o
f

c
a
p
t
u
r
e

a
n
d

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

i
n

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

a
n
d

O
c
t
o
b
e
r
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

o
f

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

o
f

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

n
a
m
e

o
f

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
[
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s

w
e
r
e

m
a
d
e

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
h
e

i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y

o
f

t
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e
.
]
10. The following provides specific procedures to follow with respect to the notification of detention, transfer or
release by Canadian Forces, and subsequent follow-up of a detainee once transferred by the Canadian Forces
in Afghanistan.
Step 1 Detention by the Canadian Forces
As soon as practically possible following detention, the JTF-Afg Detention Officer provides the DFAIT
POLAD located at KAF with specific information on the detainee and circumstances of detention (to the
extent possible) relevant for notifying the ICRC and the AIHRC of a detention.
With the information, the DFAIT POLAD informs the Political Director of the Kandahar PRT by C4 or
other comparable secure means of a detention on behalf of the Canadian Forces. The Political Director
informs the ICRC and the AIHRC representatives in Kandahar of the detention (where possible, a paper
copy is provided by the Political Director to the AIHRC and by the POLAD to the ICRC).
The Canadian Forces will hold the detainee(s) in accordance with Joint Task Force Afghanistan (JTF-
AFG) Theatre Standing Order (TSO) 321: Detention of Afghan Nationals and Other Persons.
[The use of a database containing detainee information was discussed.]
[The use of a database containing detainee information was discussed.]
Step 2 Transfers or Release of a Detainee or Detainees by the Canadian Forces
Transfers to the Afghan authorities will occur at Kandahar Airfield. Where possible, the DFAIT POLAD
located at KAF will be present at time of transfer. The ICRC and/or the AIHRC may also be invited to be
present
For each detainee transferred, the JTF-Afg Detainee Officer is to ensure that the detainee and the
detaining authority are provided with a copy of the Canadian Arrangement and informed of its content as
a reminder of the detainee's rights and the Government of Afghanistan's obligations and responsibilities.
The arrangements will be included as part of the detainee's file which will be provided to the detaining
authority along with the information contained in the notification to the ICRC and the AIHRC.
The DFAIT POLAD at KAF verifies the accuracy and completeness of the transfer/release notification
information and seeks clarification from the JTF-Afg Detention Officer if required. This should include
where possible the following based on Annex F of the Canadian Forces TSO321: Date and location of
capture / Last name / First name / Father's name / Grandfather's name / Sex / Age / Identification Serial
Numbers / Place of Birth / Nationality / Tribe / General state of health or physical condition upon transfer
or release.
DFAIT POLAD at KAF informs the Political Director of the Kandahar PRT by C4 or other comparable
secure means of the transfer or release of detainee or detainees on behalf of the Canadian Forces. The
Political Director notifies the ICRC and the AIHRC representatives in Kandahar (a paper copy is
provided by the Political Director to the AIHRC and by the POLAD to the ICRC). The same notification
procedure applies should a detainee escape from, or die in, Canadian Forces custody.
DFAIT POLAD at KAF sends electronic notification on behalf of the Canadian Forces via C4 to GENEV
and KABUL with copies sent to DFAIT (IDR/FTAG/IRH-GHA/GHH/JLH) and DND (DNATO
POL/CEFCOM J3 and J9) with request that GENEV and KABUL notify the ICRC of the transfer by
means of a diplomatic note.
GENEV, KABUL and the PRT confirm transmission of the information to the ICRC and AIHRC as
required.
January 2002 and December 2005.
December 2005
April 2007
(fewer than five)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 125)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 125)
(fewer than 30) (fewer than 70) (fewer than 10) (fewer than 50)
However,
who had recently returned from several weeks in Kabul, asked for a brief meeting before we went to the
detention facility proper. This meeting lasted for about 20 minutes, and used it to relay two concerns:
was unwilling to allow the Kandahar AIHRC
unsupervised access to detainees, to which they are entitled under the terms of the Canada-Afghanistan agreement.
[Proposed
methods for addressing concerns about access by the AIHRC were discussed, including proposals with regard to interviews
of detainees.]
[One proposed method was viewed as complying
with the agreement between the two governments.]
Also during the meeting with (the senior NDS official) [Delegation was discussed.]
(the senior NDS official)
[The concerns were discussed in the strictest confidence]
indicated (The senior NDS official)
[Other organizations' full access to NDS facilities was discussed.]
[Canada's preference for a spot check
approach to verifying the release of detainees was stated.]
(the senior NDS official's)
[Speculation regarding the reason for the alleged lack of a key was made.]
(a senior NDS official,)
November 7, 2007
November 2007
November 2007
all
(fewer than 20)
one
detainee
(fewer than 20) second detainee
November 2007
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
all
2
(fewer than 20)
are split between two buildings. NDS's newest building contains
while the other row
The old building contains
each and
while the other row
detainees wore
All
August 2007
previously interviewed him on Sep. 10, 2007 (reftel/KANDH00074, Sept. 11, 2007)
through his
a month ago
was arrested and is now in detention
with the NDS
injury
other than one that was allegedly incarcerated at NDS.
who provided him with a prescription for medication
commander
by the AIHRC and ICRC on 2 or 3
4
(senior officials and an officer)
that allow
first
male
Ramadan
in getting
released
suffering from headaches
November 2007
any medication
suffers from vertigo
medication
days
his relations with the Taliban
anyone
including the AIHRC and the ICRC.
taken to see (a senior official)
once
3
Although he did not provide names,
he alleged that they were
(senior officials and
an officer)
15 minutes
to be sent to Kabul were he would be interrogated and then killed.
sent to Kabul but that he would be killed here in Kandahar
AIHRC will share any findings
with us.
second
times.
male
[NDS's commitment to the terms of its arrangements,
and the level of support from KPRT were discussed.]
November 2007
November 2007
Chief of Investigations
Nov. 6, 2007
Nov.
6, 2007
November 05, 2007
November 05, 2007
November 2007
November 2007
(a senior official)
(since June)
Nov. 6, 2007)
(fewer than 10)
(Chief of
Investigations)
1
The one interview
1 hour
1 detainee
are split between two buildings. NDS' newest building contains
that allow
while the other row is
All
detainees wore
enter, while the other
each
October 2007
and
the AIHRC
the ICRC but that he personally
was not interviewed.
2
4
but
provided a general description of two of them
first
second
2
with his shawl
2 were
conduct an additional
visit within 2 weeks and conduct
interviews with several detainees
before we raise the issue.
November 27, 2007
November
2007.
Nov. 2007,
who is responsible
for record management. (fewer than 30)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer
than 10)
(half of the fewer than 5)
(Some are)
The other has
4
November 2007
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 5)
4
first
November 2007
(less than 2 months)
suffers from headaches and constipation.
medication for his conditions.
but it has now run out.
with medication
the
ICRC and AIHRC while in NDS
2 times
each
30 minutes
second
September 2007
health problems.
he now has
been seen by a doctor
male
a
M
examined if possible. his brother
with medication.
the
medication
representatives of both the ICRC and the AIHRC.
ICRC
blankets
15
4
(less than 2 months ago)
the
had ordered
NDS officials to kill him.
third
August 2007.
(more than 3 months.)
of the AIHRC
but not by the ICRC.
AIHRC
5 times
30 minutes.
smoked hashish
killed or sexually assaulted.
male
positively identify the individual conducting
fourth
September 2007.
control with medication.
not been examined by a doctor and that his medication ran out.
with medication by
but he stopped taking it after he showed it to the ICRC and they
indicated that it was expired.
by
representatives of the AIHRC
but stated that he has not been visited by the ICRC.
2 occasions
each interrogation
30 minutes
M
June 07, 2007
07JUN
06JUN07
05JUN07
06JUN07
07JUN07
June 6,
04JUN07
07JUN06
For a full report on demarches conducted by PRT on this issue,
06JUN07
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 10)
15
May
JUN07.
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 10)
All
(fewer than 10)
recently
limited
AIHRC or ICRC at the time
since his arrival at the NDS. He was also being kept in
shackles and was wearing sight deprivation goggles.
07JUN07
in solitary
confinement
September 28, 2007
September
September 2007
September 27, 2007
September
Sept 2007
Director of Investigations,
(minor)
the two baskets of explosives
a week or so ago
they would not remove the shackles from the prisoners
until we delivered on these items.
Sep07
Sep07
Aug07
that day
to hear security-related cases.
September 2007
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 25)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than five)
other
(fewer than five)
2
first
Sep07
his
illness
the doctor
that he should walk a lot and drink lots
of water
a doctor
a doctor
His ankles were visibly swollen and he said he had pain in his
While it is Ramadan he is observing the fast
for
those who are ill.
tap water
bottled water.
often due to his condition.
a Talib name
of the Taliban, as they had beaten him and
accused him of spying.
The ICRC
the AIHRC or the ICRC.
the first to visit.
just once 30 minutes
criminal record.
the medical care
Canadians for which he was not required to pay.
the
his health concerns
first
Sep07.
days ago.
days ago.
Monday
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 15).
male
male
during
Ramadan
in the old detention building so he has had no interaction with other prisoners.
(he has not been interrogated yet)
AIHRC or ICRC
mostly women.
from
for Ramadan
Ramadan
bottled water
November 10, 2007
November
2007
November 2007
all
all
2 detainees
(fewer than 20)
November 2007
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(an official)
(Another official)
(officials)
(a senior
official)
(the
senior
official)
all
2 detainees
are split between two buildings. NDS' newest building contains
that allow
while the other row is
each and
enter, while the other
All detainees wore
August 2007
first
months ago
ICRC had brought
a doctor during one of their visits but
months alone in a cell located in the old
building
located in the new building with other detainees
the
AIHRC
ICRC
ICRC
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(less than 5)
(less than 3)
(fewer than 10)
male
4
30 minutes
second
October 2007
#2
his brother-in-law and with a friend
suffering from
headaches
his heart is beating abnormally fast
to see a doctor
any medication
He alleged that he has had no opportunity to interact with other inmates since he is
being held in a cell on his own
the AIHRC and the ICRC
2
20-30 minutes/
office
(fewer than 30 days)
male
(the
senior
official's)
(A senior
NDS
official)
November 11, 2007
November
Nov. 2007,
November 2007
(an official)
(the
official)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 15)
3 detainees
3
2007
first
July 2007.
male
colder weather
been examined by a doctor
the type of a specialist that he needs.
to see a doctor
the medication that was prescribed by the doctor in KAF.
by representatives
of the ICRC
neither the ICRC or the AIHRC
2
3
hours
the second one
1 hour
second
August 2007.
male
the first
in his
in his area
with a group of
inmates
really crowded
of the ICRC
by the AIHRC

once
the interrogation
1 hour
his business associates
third
September 2007.
M
suffers from itching on different parts of his body
examined by a doctor while in KAF
a prescription
the itching
prescribed medication
group of
detainees
the number of people
both the ICRC and the AIHRC
but not since his arrival in
Sarpoza
2 times
1 time
1 hour and 1 hours
30 minutes.
GS
Moreover, witness accounts based on direct observations of the MPs performance would
obviously constitute critical evidence.
In the course of this investigation, information has come to the Commission's attention
which suggests that one or more representatives of the Canadian Security Intelligence
Service (CSIS) were present and participated in the processing and/or transfer of
detainees in Afghanistan in the custody of the CF MPs to ASF, in particular the Afghan
National Security Directorate (NDS).
Such activities by the CSIS representatives in question would put them in a likely
position to have information or observations regarding the manner of treatment afforded
to detainees by members of ASF, as well as the level of awareness of same on the part of
CF MPs. Such information or observations would obviously be of considerable interest
to the Commission in the context of this investigation.
As such, the Commission requests from CSIS the following by way of assistance with its
investigation:

clarification of the precise nature of the role played by CSIS representatives in Afghanistan with
respect to Afghan detainees transferred, or to be transferred, from the custody of CF MPs to ASF
representatives at any time between December 2005 and the suspension of detainee transfers in
November 2007, with particular reference to certain detainees transferred at Kandahar Air Field on
the morning of April 8, 2006 (local time);

access to reports or other relevant records produced by CSIS representatives in connection with this
role during this period; and
access, for interview purposes, to CSIS representatives who have personal knowledge of the
foregoing matters.
(An ISAF official)
(The
official)
(the official)
(The official)
(fewer than 5 detainees) September September
September
September
(less than 3 weeks after detention)
(fewer than 5)
(provincial level)
ICRC office in Kabul
[The level of detail of the
information provided by Canada was discussed.]
(one ISAF member)
(a senior official who)
(The
official)
(the official)
(The
official)
(the official's)
(the
official)
(The
official)
(the
official)
(the
official)
(the official)
(The
official)
(the official)
(The
official's)
(However, another party would
like to discuss the detainee issue with ISAF.) If the (high ranking officials)
(the party notified)
(The notified party's)
I speak for ISAF
(with the notified party)
(as other ISAF states have done)
[The reliability of the Government of Afghanistan with respect to detainee rights was
discussed.]
which is likely to be difficult and time-consuming
[Awareness of detainee mistreatment, the existence of similar allegations of mistreatment, and
level of concern over the allegations were discussed.]
were discussed, including perceptions thereof.]
[Possible responses by the Afghan government
[Potential implications for support of the Afghan mission were discussed.]
[Future meetings and briefings on the allegations were discussed.]
[Likely responses by the Afghan government were discussed.]
[Alternatives to the likely responses were discussed.]
[Information received from NATO in the wake of the allegations was discussed. NATO's
position on the allegations was discussed, along with proposed response.]
[A possible demarche was discussed, along with the likely consequences of the
demarche.]
[An assessment was made as to the likelihood of the allegations being confirmed by future
investigations.]
(with a specific senior official)
(from that official)
(from sources within the Government of Afghanistan regarding whether or not the proposed course of action would be followed.)
Government of Afghanistan officials was discussed.]
[Canada's ability to contact specific
[Proposed contacts within the Government
of Afghanistan were mentioned.]
[Other officials to be present
at the demarche were discussed.]
[Possible actions that the Government of Afghanistan might take in
response to the subject matter of the demarche were discussed.]
[A possible discussion regarding the NDS's proposed response to AIHRC suggestions that the
[A specific official was named.]
[The source through which Canada
obtained the report was mentioned.]
[The contents of the report were discussed. The
report was said to outline the NDS's proposed response to AIHRC suggestions that the NDS mistreats detainees,
as reported in the media.]
[Canada's position
on the course of action outlined in the report was stated.]
[Canada's position on the course of action outlined in the report was stated, including its position on Afghanistan's
international obligations.]
(the views of a certain
NDS official.)
NDS
mistreats
detainees
was
outlined.]
(to relay the suggestion to)
[It was noted that one ISAF state notified immediately upon detainee capture, and another
within 24 hours.]
with
which it has a detainee-monitoring arrangement
and
(another ISAF
member's)
[Allegations against Governor Khalid were discussed.]
[Communication between the NDS and AIHRC
officials was discussed.] [Communications between the NDS and AIHRC regarding the Globe & Mail article were
discussed, including the NDS's proposed response to the allegations in the article. Internal discussions within the AIHRC regarding the article
were also discussed.]
[The results of internal discussions within the AIHRC regarding the Globe
& Mail article were discussed. It was suggested that what was presented as
direct knowledge of torture had been misconstrued.]
[Interaction between an AIHRC official and
authorities was discussed.]
[The position of one ISAF state regarding access problems was stated. The
opinion was expressed that the denial of access constituted a breach of obligations and that a solution
should be reached before the problem became public in domestic media.]
[ICRC access to NDS facilities was discussed.]
[A reported admission by Governor Khalid regarding a private detainee facility was discussed. It
was also reported that the lives of detainees held at the facility had been threatened.]
Son travail
consistait principalement interroger des dtenus et d'intragir
avec des civils dans le but d'acqurir des renseignements
tactiques.
sept.
oct
(moins de cinq)
dec
(moins de cinq)
(moins de cinq)
jan
l'ANA et l'ANP
(d'un agence Afghan et les forces d'arme.)
(les allegations de mauvais traitement de les populations civils et les dtnus
ont t fait.)
(a specific official)
an alleged holding facility
by the NDS and ANP as well as conditions of
detention facilities;
by the NDS and ANP, as well as conditions of
detention facilities."
(we would not, given Afghan administrative limitations,
recommend relying solely on notification through their Kabul office).
[The proposed policy was discussed.
The purpose of the policy was said to be the re-categorization of certain detainees and the shifting of responsibility for
detainees. It was noted that the proposed policy is not being put into effect. Reasons for this were discussed including
capacity issues and political considerations. Efforts to bring the policy into effect were discussed. Alternatives to the
policy were discussed.]
[The title of the proposed policy was mentioned.]
[Recategorization of certain detainees was discussed.]
[The application of the new policy was discussed.]
[A proposed shift in
responsibility over detainees was discussed.]
[Difficulties with
tracking detainees and lack of information about treatment of detainees after transfer to the NDS were discussed. Responsibility over
detainees was discussed.]
[Tracking of detainees was discussed.]
(clarify the legal status of
detainees in accordance with international law.)
[The basis for the detainee
legal structure was discussed, including the existence of classified information. Transparency about adherence to the existing
structure was discussed.]
[US detainee policy was discussed.]
[Government of Afghanistan actions following transfer of detainees by the US were discussed.]
[It was reported that despite high levels of effort to have the policy implemented, it had not been
brought forward. The fact that alternatives to the policy had been contemplated was noted.]
[Concern about the detainee issue was discussed.]
[Numbers of
Afghans detained by one ISAF state were discussed.]
[Domestic political attention to the detainee issue in one ISAF state was discussed.]
[The proposed subject of
the policy was discussed.].
(proposed announcement on)
[The prospects of ratification of the policy were discussed.]
[Pre-requisites to the applicability of
the policy were discussed.]
[The interest of another group was mentioned.]
[Engagement of the group regarding the proposed new
policy was discussed.]
[Possible engagement with other
interested groups was discussed.]
[The possible introduction of a new policy on detainees
was discussed.]
[The proposed subject of the policy was discussed.]
[The proposed policy was discussed. Changes that would be effected by the new policy,
including a shift away from the current system, and a transference of responsibility over detainees were discussed.]
[Potential problems with the proposed policy, including similarities
to an internationally criticized model, were discussed.]
[Possible engagement with
the interested group was
discussed.]
consulted
(was)
(recent discussions)
(the proposed policy)
[The prospects of ratification of the policy were discussed.]
[Pre-requisites to the applicability of the policy
were discussed.]
[Involvement with the
proposed new policy was discussed.]
[Possible steps to be taken
regarding the proposed new policy were discussed, including steps to legitimize the proposed procedure.]
(was)
(of the proposed
policy)
consulted
(representatives
of an ISAF state)
(and other ISAF states)
[Access to NDS facilities and documentation regarding the NDS's
mandate were discussed.]
[Proposed amendments to the MoU
were discussed.]
[Notification procedures regarding detainee
transfers were discussed.]
[It was reported that AIHRC access to NDS facilities is limited. ICRC access practices were discussed. The existence of
complaints regarding access was discussed.]
[Transfer notification practices and access issues were discussed. The existence of complaints regarding access was discussed.]
[The possibility of supporting more transparency on NDS detainee issues was discussed. The possibility of a joint meeting with the
AIHRC to discuss access and capacity was discussed.]
from Governor
Asadullah Khalid
[Concerns were raised and next steps were discussed. It was suggested that it be conveyed that
Canada would be monitoring the welfare of Canadian journalists and their staffs.]
of Asadullah
personally torturing detainees at private detention facilities. We are also aware of cases where he has made threats against
Kandaharis
[Other unsubstantiated allegations
were noted.]
(total of one ISAF state)
[The number of detainees taken was discussed.]
[The total number of detainees of one ISAF state, including recent
additions, was discussed. The total number was less than 25.
Detainees added in recent operations were fewer than 10.]
[Detainees taken by ISAF states were discussed. One state had increased its numbers by fewer than 5, for a total of fewer than 10.
The frequency of that state taking detainees was discussed. Another state's total was less than 5. Its arrangements for detainee
responsibility were discussed.]
first three months of
(1 January- 1 April 2007),
(more than 140)
(less than 20%)
(more than 80%) (fewer than 50)
(more than 40)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 5)
(why other states' detainee numbers are lower than Canada's.)
(particular sensitivity to the detainee issue in certain states.)
(fewer than 25 detainees of one ISAF state's) ( fewer than five)
(another ISAF state's
policy is to)
[The continuation of one ISAF state's arrangements for detainee responsibility was discussed.]
[Uncertainty
was expressed as to whether the Canadian numbers included those detained by special forces.]
[Domestic
debate on the detainee issue in one ISAF state was discussed.]
[The relative assertiveness of two ISAF states' operational
stances were discussed. One state was
compared with Canada.]
[ISAF forces' awareness
of targets was discussed.]
[Unsubstantiated but persistent rumours regarding incentives for
certain ISAF soldiers to take detainees were discussed.]
[A detainee
who was transferred to the NDS and is now unaccounted-for was discussed.]
[Efforts by one ISAF state to maintain information regarding detainee captures and transfers were discussed. The prospects of continuous
monitoring were discussed.]
[Detainees captured by one ISAF state were discussed. It was reported that, of the fewer than 10 detainees, half have been released by the
Government of Afghanistan, while the other half remain under NDS control. The ISAF state's visits and impressions of detainee treatment
were discussed.]
[The advisability of this decision
was discussed. The AIHRC's capacity was discussed.]
[The practice of handing over detainees to the custody of the
Government of Afghanistan within 96 hours was discussed, including possible extension of the practice, and flexibility in interpreting the
practice.]
[Representatives of several states expressed dissatisfaction with the detainee issue.
The previously contemplated prospect of a shift of responsibility over detainees within the Government of Afghanistan was discussed, along
with the reasons the proposal was abandoned.]
(both problematic.)
[Negative assessments of the MoJ detention system were reported.
Speculation of bribery in the system was raised.]
[The trustworthiness and transparency of the
NDS system were discussed.]
[Reports of problems with access and transparency with respect to the NDS
were discussed. Suspicions of maltreatment of detainees by the NDS were reported.]
[Detainee facilities and the contemplated transfer of
responsibility over detainees were discussed.]
[Participation in other possible facilities projects was discussed.]
[Capacity at the facility was discussed.]
[Detainee tracking practices were discussed.]
[Proposed support for the NDS was discussed.
Issues encountered with contacting the NDS were discussed.]
Please contact me if we can be of assistance in this regard.
[The allegations of abuse in Afghan detention facilities were discussed, as
well as capacity to investigate the same.]
[The identification of location and status of the fewer than 150 Afghans already transferred to the
Government of Afghanistan was discussed.]
[Levels of cooperation and status of relationship with NDS
were discussed.]
[The legalization of the status of detainees was raised.]
(to relay the suggestion to)
[It was noted that one ISAF state notified immediately upon detainee capture, and another within 24 hours.]
[
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s

o
n

a
c
c
e
s
s

t
o

N
D
S

f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,

N
D
S

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s

w
i
t
h

r
e
s
p
e
c
t

t
o

t
i
m
i
n
g

o
f

v
i
s
i
t
s
,

a
n
d

l
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s

o
n

f
a
c
e
-
t
o
-
f
a
c
e

i
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
s

w
e
r
e

d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
.

I
t

w
a
s

r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

a
n

N
D
S

o
f
f
i
c
e
r

h
a
d

s
t
a
t
e
d

t
h
a
t

s
l
a
p
p
i
n
g

a
n
d

s
l
e
e
p

d
e
p
r
i
v
a
t
i
o
n

a
r
e

p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
d
.
]
[Allegations regarding a private detention facility allegedly maintained by the Governor of Kandahar
were discussed. Proposed enquiries into the existence of the alleged facility, and confirmation and
reaction to those enquiries were discussed.]
(allegations of
misconduct)
(official)
(and help with access)
(due to the absence of a specific individual)
a common
demarche on
(one ISAF state)
[The content and utility of the demarche were discussed.]
[The necessity of a common demarche on detainee facilities was discussed.
The possibility of a joint demarche on other detainee-related issues, including the proposed tripartite MoU, was discussed.]
RC(S) pol/mil
(the Governor being approached regarding allegations against him.)
[Commencement of the project, installation of the system and funding of
the project were discussed.]
[Detainees captured by various ISAF states were discussed.
Possible exchange of detainee-monitoring responsibilities was discussed.]
[Responsibility for
detainees within other ISAF states was discussed.]
[An investigation of earlier
allegations was discussed.]
[Allegations of detainee mistreatment and a possible response were discussed].
(more than
half of the
fewer than 10)
[A group within the NDS' understanding of the SA
was discussed.] (a senior NDS
official)
I told
[The signing of the SA and its applicability to the NDS
was discussed.]
(The applicability of the SA to the NDS was discussed.)
[NDS officials' understanding of the SA
Thus, it may be a good idea at
some point to set up a general human rights training session/seminar for the NDS in Kandahar, at which time we
could also brief their staff on the content of the bilateral arrangements existing between Canada and
Afghanistan and how these may affect their activities (SA, Dec 18 2005 agreement, etc.)
was discussed.]
(to a senior ICRC official)
(several other ICRC officials)
[Canada's position on the allegations of mistreatment and an investigation
were discussed.]
[Detainee related topics of discussion to be raised at ISAF meeting.]
PM Harper discussed the detainees issue with President Karzai
(International Directors)
(international)
[The pending suspension of detainee transfers by Canadian forces was discussed.]
[Investigative capacity building regarding the treatment of Canadian transferred detainees was
discussed.]
[Canada's position on allegations of detainee mistreatment and the role of the AIHRC were
[Canada's position on allegations of detainee mistreatment and the role of the AIHRC were discussed.]
discussed.]
[Investigative capacity building regarding the treatment of Canadian transferred detainees was
discussed.]
[Support for the issue was expressed by a number of international parties.]
[the role of the AIHRC was discussed.]
[The AIHRC's mandate and independence was discussed.]
[Canada's position on allegations of mistreatment was discussed].
[Access to NDS
facilities was discussed.]
[AIHRC access was discussed.]
[Proposed investigations into the allegations of
detainee mistreatment were discussed].
(by a senior NDS official)
(expressed security concerns)
but then
[The creation of a proper detainee database was discussed.]
[Communication between the AIHRC and NDS was discussed, along with proposed solutions to improve it.]
We also underscored our bottom line
We were told
[Two potential approaches regarding facilities were discussed.]
[The rationale for certain detainee transfer decisions was offered.]
an investigation were discussed.]
[Canada's position on the allegations and
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 10)
JUN
All
confinement
in solitary
is (who)
(One of ISAF's nation's Embassy)
especially (for one organization)
The representative [Issues of compliance with the rule of law,
transparency, and guidelines for standards of practice for detainee treatment in NDS facilities were discussed, as well as
consequences for failing to meet standards.]
and separate.
to existing facilities
[Comparable conditions of detention,
release rates of detainees and issues of transparency, legality and human rights were discussed.]
[Canada discussed another option for ensuring
transparency and access.]
[Another option for handling detainees was discussed and issues with this option were noted.]
[The legal foundations of an agency and detention facilities
were discussed.]
asked
in any member state
[The conditions in a member state's facility were favourably compared with those in a local facility.]
[Different agencies' suitability
for responsibility for ISAF detainees was compared, and rates of prosecution of detainees and ISAF
responsibility for detainees were discussed.]
[Different frameworks for prosecuting detainees captured by ISAF
were discussed and compared.]
[Provincial-prison designs and the possibility of constructing new facilities were discussed.]
suggested
(reservations were expressed about the limited number of projects)
[An investigation of earlier allegations
was discussed.]
[Canada's concerns about allegations of detainee mistreatment at another facility and Canada's monitoring of Canadian-
[Canada's position on the allegations, as well as commitments to investigate and to provide access were discussed.]
transferred detainees were discussed.] During
the course of our monitoring, (Canada) had been presented with allegations of abuse from individuals
who had been held by (another facility.) We were shown marks that we were told had come from physical abuse.
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than
10)
(less than 3 month stay)
[Relationships
between Canada and Afghanistan were discussed.]
(official)
the majority of detainees who are transferred have to be released.
(fewer than 100 cases covering some fewer than 200 people)
the majority of detainees we transfer are released.
(a large majority of Canadian detainees are transferred to the NDS.)
were told by him that he would
They
as alleged
had spoken to La Presse)
and that he was not aware of any
problems with the documentation
check into allegations made by
(he did not know who
(a senior official)
(The senior official) (The senior official)
[NDS's commitment to the terms of its arrangements, and the level of support from KPRT were
discussed.]
The one interview
1 hour
October
(fewer than 10)
(Chief of
Investigations)
conduct an additional visit within 2 weeks and conduct interviews with several detainees before we raise the issue
(the senior
official)
(the senior
official)
(an official)
(Another official)
(officials)
(a senior official)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
of all
August
months
months alone
other
(less than 5)
(less than 3)
(fewer than 10)
(the senior official's)
(A senior NDS official)
October
being held in a cell on his own.
since he is
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
in getting released
November
25
days
taken to see
(less than 5)
(a senior official)
(senior officials and
an officer)
(fewer than 30)
(just over half)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 20)
May
June
months
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 12)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 50)
(fewer than 50)
unknown
(fewer than 50)
Nov.
Nov.
Nov.
(most of the fewer than 20)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 30)
[Concern about consequences of the delays was expressed. The possibility of raising
this issue with others was discussed.]
[Consequences
of the delays were discussed.]
[It was learned that Sarpoza faces challenges with respect to documentation from transferring
authorities.]
November
01
(fewer than five)
February
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
March
(less than a week)
March
(less than 2 weeks ago)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
March
(less than
1 week)
March
(less than 2
weeks ago)
March
March
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
March
March
(less than 2 weeks)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
March
(less than 2 weeks)
(less than 2 weeks)
March
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 15)
March
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
[The frequency of this
situation was discussed.]
[The medical condition of individuals received from another facility,
possibly due to mistreatment, was discussed. NDS' refusal in the past to accept custody of individuals because of their medical
condition was discussed.]
[Allegations of mistreatment by another facility's officers and NDS' decision not to accept custody of
detainees who are unfit for transfer are discussed.]
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 50)
May
(fewer than 50)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 50)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 40)
June
(fewer than five)
(fewer than 5)
(ISAF and the NDS.)
(operational concerns, strategies and allied contributions)
discussed.]
The reliability of the Government of Afghanistan with respect to detainees' rights was
[other ISAF states' detention policies during combat were discussed.]
detainees
are not
being reported to the International Committee of the Red Cross as per (International
obligations and specific arrangements)
[ISAF forces' awareness of targets was discussed.]
[An assessment
was made as to the likelihood of the allegations being confirmed by
future investigations.]
[Reported allegations of maltreatment of detainees were discussed.]
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 25)
(fewer than five)
(fewer than five)
Aug
other
(fewer than five)
(a senior official)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 30)
(1) to allow KABUL to raise the
allegation with senior Afghan officials and to press the GoA to investigate, while still ensuring the
confidentiality of the detainee who has made this most recent allegation of abuse; (2) to ascertain the
safety and well-being of all remaining Canadian-transferred detainees at the NDS facility in particular;
(3) to clearly impress upon NDS and Government of Aghanistan officials, in Kandahar and in Kabul, the
seriousness with which the Government of Canada takes all allegations of abuse; (4) to establish clearly
the status of all Canadian-transferred detainees.
(a
specified number of visits over a specific period of time)
[Security issues associated with the visits were discussed.]
(1) to allow KABUL to raise the allegation
with senior Afghan officials and to press the GoA to investigate, while still ensuring the confidentiality of the
detainee who has made this most recent allegation of abuse; (2) to ascertain the safety and well-being of all
remaining Canadian-transferred detainees at the NDS facility in particular; (3) to clearly impress upon NDS
and Government of Aghanistan officials, in Kandahar and in Kabul, the seriousness with which the
Government of Canada takes all allegations of abuse; (4) to establish clearly the status of all Canadian-
transferred detainees.
(a specified
number of
visits over a
specific
period of
time)
[Security issues associated with the visits were discussed.]
November
(nov
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 15)
more than on September
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
September
November ?
(an officer)
(fewer than 30)
(just over half)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 20)
Jun-07
May-07
Jul-07
Jul-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Aug-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jul-07
Jul-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Aug-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Sep-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Oct-07
Nov-07
Nov-07
Nov-07
Nov-07
Nov-07
Nov-07
Sep-07*
Sep-07*
Sep-07*
* Interviewed on Sept
[A concern about one proposed Canadian
action was expressed.]
[The need for a thorough investigation and prosecution, the implementation of a
mitigation strategy to prevent mistreatment, and a previously requested letter on
detention facilities were discussed.]
"to whatever extent (we) want".
[Details of the
investigative process were given, and assurances regarding Canadian detainees were made.]
[The options, the need for expert consultation, and logistical difficulties with one
particular option were discussed. Other options, including the suspension of transfer
of detainees, and more regular visits by CSC officials, were considered favourably.
Interim measures regarding transfers were proposed.]
[The need for concrete and effective measures was discussed.]
[The referred redactions on this page pertain to:
allegations of detainee mistreatment, access to detainees, release
of section 38 documents, ability of the government of
Afghanistan to respond to the allegations, the November 13
Amnesty International Report, and progress and coordination on
the detainee issue (including transfers and post-transfer follow-
up)]
[The redacted portions of this document outline the substance
of the demarche to be delivered to the Government of
Afghanistan. Topics to be discussed included Canada's
serious concerns about (1) recent incidents; (2) the parties'
commitments under the May 3, 2007 Supplementary
Arrangement; (3) allegations of abuse; (4) investigations into
allegations of abuse; (5) AIHRC access to detainees; and (6)
information about transfers and releases.]
[The redacted portions of this document outline the substance of the demarche to be delivered to the Government of
Afghanistan. Topics to be discussed included Canada's serious concerns about (1) recent incidents; (2) the parties'
commitments under the May 3, 2007 Supplementary Arrangement; (3) allegations of abuse; (4) investigations into
allegations of abuse; (5) AIHRC access to detainees; and (6) information about transfers and releases.]
[The redacted portions of this document outline the substance of the demarche to be delivered to the Government of
Afghanistan. Topics to be discussed included Canada's serious concerns about (1) recent incidents; (2) the parties'
commitments under the May 3, 2007 Supplementary Arrangement; (3) allegations of abuse; (4) investigations into
allegations of abuse; (5) AIHRC access to detainees; and (6) information about transfers and releases.]
[Canada and Afghanistan's serious concerns over the allegations of detainee
mistreatment and the need for consequential results from monitoring and investigations
were discussed. The status and scope of the investigation, the possible prosecution of a
suspect, and the timing of investigative results were also discussed.]
[Immediate and long term strategies, including training, monitoring devices, judicial
processes, the transfer of detainees to Kabul, and detention facility capacity and
upgrading were discussed. Specific areas of improvement within the detention system
were prioritized.]
[The extent of access by the AIHRC to Canadian detainees was discussed, and
commitments to providing access and a potential rationale for denying access were
also discussed.]
(if the desired results
are not obtained.)
(relate to the NDS detention facility in Kandahar,)
(other concerns regarding Canadian-transferred detainees
were expressed to senior members of the Afghan government.)
[Afghanistan's compliance with commitments under its arrangements, the NDS
facility in Kandahar, assurances given regarding the treatment of Canadian-
transferred detainees, the need for a thorough investigation into prior allegations of
mistreatment, recent actions by NDS officials in Kandahar, and the Afghan-
Canadian partnership were discussed.]
(a senior government official was aware of the allegations
and took them seriously, as did NDS officials.)
[Operational
concerns were expressed.]
isolated the problem
(was a perfect solution to ensuring proper detainee treatment.)
(fewer than 30) (fewer than 25)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 30)
(whatever was deemed the best system would be adopted.)
to record detainee arrival and onward
movement based on the originating source (e.g. Canadian-transferred, ANP-transferred, NDS.)
(a senior NDS
official)
(The senior NDS official)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 25)
(fewer than 10)
(un fonctionnaire de NDS)
(le fonctionnaire de NDS)
(moins de 5)
(moins de 30)
(moins de 25)
(moins de 10)
[The sensitive issue of the detainees and the temporary suspension of the transfer of Canadian
detainees due to conditions surrounding the handling of prisoners were discussed.]
[The detainee issue and results
from the investigation into allegations of mistreatment were discussed.]
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 25)
(fewer than 10)
(a specific NDS official)
who made the allegation of mistreatment
(at an earlier date)
interviewed detainee referred to above
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 25)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 30)
this type of
situation is quite frequent.
[The transfer of seriously injured
detainees from the ANP, speculation about the source of the injuries, and NDS' decision in the past not to
accept transfer of detainees based on their medical condition were discussed.]
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 15)
due largely to communications
problems within NDS
(fewer than 100)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer
than five)
(fewer than five)
All of the allegations heard relate to time spent in the NDS Kandahar facility; none of the individuals complained about
mistreatment in Kabul facilities
(a senior official)
[Concerns about investigation reports were raised.]
[Concerns about investigation reports were raised.]
[A justification for the continued
use of shackles was given, and means to improve the situation were discussed.]
(discussed medical access, monitoring
and human rights.)
(fewer than 10)
(a senior official)
[Detainee visit regimes were compared.]
[The body with which to have capacity building discussions was provided.]
(fewer than 15)
for security reasons.
[The content of a statement was discussed.]
(as most of the fewer than 20)
(senior official)
[Alleged detainee mistreatment and an independent investigative commission were
discussed.]
[Means of improving detention
facilities and detainee handling were
discussed.]
[Both parties' concerns were expressed.]
(with regard to a potential investigation)
(with regard
to investigations of alleged detainee mistreatment.)
(all fewer than 15)
(fewer than 20)
detainees
[Further demarches were discussed.]
(all fewer than 15)
[An allegation of mistreatment and follow-up was discussed.]
(fewer than 20)
additional visits in the next few days
(however, the file may not be
transferred with the detainee.)
[Follow-up was discussed.]
[A potential investigation
was discussed.]
[The allegations of mistreatment, an
investigation, and the need for more information were discussed.]
[Canada's position on the earlier allegations of detainee
mistreatment was expressed.]
(fewer than 5)
detainees
(Some of the detainees)
(the remaining detainees had)
[The most recent allegations of detainee
mistreatment and the issue of minors as detainees were discussed.]
[Monitoring, treatment, and investigations into
allegations of mistreatment, as reported in the
media, were discussed.]
(senior official)
[Canada's position on the allegations of detainee mistreatment and a possible
investigation were discussed.]
[Investigative capacity building regarding
the treatment of Canadian-transferred detainees was discussed.]
[Investigative capacity building regarding the treatment of Canadian-transferred detainees was
discussed.]
[Details of the AIHRC's visits and on detainees were provided.]
[Restrictions on access to NDS detention centres, NDS practices
with respect to detainee monitoring, alleged mistreatment of
detainees, and alleged practices with regard to the length and
conditions of detention were discussed.]
[The portions of the AIHRC letter relating to access to NDS detention facilities were discussed.]
[The portions of the AIHRC letter relating to access to NDS detention facilities were discussed.]
[The need for unrestricted access to NDS detention centres by the AIHRC was discussed, as well as domestic and international
standards and law relating to the treatment of detainees and to due process for detainees.]
new
old faces charges related to abuse of a detainee.
NDS
(senior official)
(senior official)
(a senior NDS
Kandahar official)
[As generally disclosed by the Government of Canada (in document DFAIT-26, for example), in or around
November 2007, charges were laid against a senior NDS Kandahar official who was accused of torturing a
detainee. The Investigation Record outlines the evidence received in the course of the investigation into the
official's conduct. Following the investigation, the charges against the official were dropped due to lack of
evidence.]
there are clearly shortcomings.
[The prosecution and detention of a senior NDS official, the management of the facility, judicial issues, and
improvements to the detainee situation at the NDS facility in Kandahar were discussed.]
(the importance of the detainee issue in
Canada was reiterated by a senior Afghan official to another.)
(senior
official)
[The details of the investigation, its outcome, the detention of the suspect, and NDS' role in the
prosecution were discussed.]
[The reason for the outcome of the investigation, and the likely reaction to this outcome, were discussed.]
[The reason for the outcome of the investigation was further discussed, and questions about the evidence
were raised.]
[The whereabouts of the suspect and the future direction of the prosecution were discussed.]
(The senior
official)
(the role of the Attorney General's Office was discussed.)
[The role of the NDS in the prosecution and its future direction was discussed.]
AIHRC and the Canadian media was discussed.]
[Interaction between
[This document reports the information that was
learned about the evidence against, and the
investigation into, a senior NDS official who
was accused of torturing a detainee. The
document describes the evidence collected in the
course of the investigation, and questions the
reliability of some of it. It also reports that,
following the investigation, the charges against
the official were dropped due to lack of
evidence. The document also reports that the
matter might be investigated again.]
[This document reports the information that was
learned about the evidence against, and the
investigation into, a senior NDS official who
was accused of torturing a detainee. The
document describes the evidence collected in the
course of the investigation, and questions the
reliability of some of it. It also reports that,
following the investigation, the charges against
the official were dropped due to lack of
evidence. The document also reports that the
matter might be investigated again.]
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 50)
February
(fewer than 80)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 80)
(fewer than 10)
Dec
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
were
(moins de 30)
(moins de cinq)
(moins de cinq)
(moins de cinq)
(moins de 30)
(moins de cinq)
(moins de cinq)
(moins de cinq)
[The applicability of the SA to the NDS was discussed.]
[NDS officials' understanding of the SA was discussed.]
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 40)
J
u
n
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
D
e
c
-
0
5
M
a
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
2
M
a
y
-
0
2
M
a
y
-
0
2
M
a
y
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
M
a
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
2
M
a
y
-
0
2
M
a
y
-
0
2
M
a
y
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
l
-
0
2
J
u
n
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
S
e
p
-
0
5
D
e
c
-
0
5
M
a
r
-
0
6
M
a
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
U
S
A
N
P
A
N
A
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
A
p
r
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
M
a
y
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
P
T
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
n
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
D
e
c
e
a
s
e
d
i
n
C
a
n
a
d
i
a
n
C
u
s
t
o
d
y
J
u
l
-
0
6
N
D
S
F
a
m
i
l
y
A
N
A
H
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
/
A
A
N
P
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
N
D
S
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
N
D
S
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
N
D
S
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
l
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
N
P

-

i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
J
u
l
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
A
u
g
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
A
N
P
-
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
A
N
P
A
N
P
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
S
e
p
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
A
N
P
A
N
P
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
O
c
t
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
F
e
b
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
N
o
v
-
0
6
N
o
v
-
0
6
U
N
K
N
o
v
-
0
6
? F
e
b
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
J
a
n
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
F
e
b
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
M
a
r
-
0
7
A
p
r
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
M
a
y
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
N
D
S
(
M
i
n
o
r
,

a
g
e

a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
d
)
(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

(
M
i
n
o
r
)

L
a
c
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
o
u
n
d

G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
U
n
i
n
j
u
r
e
d
w
o
u
n
d
U
n
i
n
j
u
r
e
d
U
n
i
n
j
u
r
e
d
w
o
u
n
d

U
n
i
n
j
u
r
e
d
T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
r
e
d

v
i
a

A
N
A
c
o
n
t
u
s
i
o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y

f
i
t
,

s
o
m
e

c
o
n
t
u
s
i
o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y

f
i
t
,

s
o
m
e

c
o
n
t
u
s
i
o
n
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p

0
5
I
C
R
C

a
d
v
i
s
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r

0
7
M
a
r
c
h

0
6
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
i
l

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n

0
2
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l

0
2
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l

0
2
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n

0
5
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p

0
5
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p

0
5
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c

0
5
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p

0
5
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
i
l

0
6
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
G
o
o
d

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
t

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

a
t
u
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e

a
n
d

u
n
c
o
n
s
c
i
o
u
s
n
o
w

c
o
n
s
c
i
o
u
s

a
n
d

s
t
i
l
l

b
e
i
n
g

t
r
e
a
t
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
f

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r
i
l

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
J
u
n
e

0
6
J
u
n
e

0
6
J
u
n
e

0
6
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e

0
6
;

G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
f

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
n
e

2
0
0
6
A
p
r
i
l

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
M
a
y

0
6
J
u
n
e

0
6
J
u
n
e
E
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
t

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
W
o
u
n
d
e
d
D
e
c
e
a
s
e
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
i
n
g

m
e
d
i
c
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

s
t
a
t
e

o
f

h
e
a
l
t
h

o
r

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t
F
i
t
:

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s
D
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
a
r
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s

t
o

r
e
c
e
i
v
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
.

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

s
t
a
t
e

o
f

h
e
a
l
t
h

o
r

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

a
t

t
i
m
e

o
f

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
J
u
l
y
J
u
n
e
J
u
l
y
A
u
g
u
s
t
J
u
n
e
I
C
R
C

J
u
l
y
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
.

U
p
d
a
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n

p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d

t
o

G
E
N
E
V
A
u
g
u
s
t
J
u
l
y
.

G
E
N
E
V
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y

-

I
C
R
C
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l
y
w
o
u
n
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

a
t

t
i
m
e

o
f

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

a
t

t
i
m
e

o
f

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

F
i
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l
y
.

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
J
u
l
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
A
u
g
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
J
u
l
y
I
C
R
C

I
C
R
C

I
C
R
C

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
l
y
A
u
g
u
s
t
J
u
l
y
A
u
g
A
u
g
u
s
t
A
u
g
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
J
u
l
y
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

S
u
f
f
e
r
i
n
g

f
r
o
m

s
o
f
t

t
r
a
u
m
a

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

h
e
a
l
t
h

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

u
n
k
n
o
w
n

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

f
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
,

w
i
t
h

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

D
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

w
a
s

a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
e
r
e
d

f
i
r
s
t

a
i
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
A
u
g
u
s
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
u
g
u
s
t
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
w
o
u
n
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

w
i
t
h

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

w
i
t
h

n
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

f
o
r
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

/

F
i
t

f
o
r

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

/

F
i
t

f
o
r

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

C
l
e
a
r
e
d

f
o
r

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

C
l
e
a
r
e
d

f
o
r

r
e
l
e
a
s
e

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
S
e
p
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

u
n
k
n
o
w
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

u
n
k
n
o
w
n

G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
O
c
t
O
c
t
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
N
o
v
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
O
c
t
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
N
o
v
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
N
o
v
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
N
o
v
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
N
o
v
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

u
n
k
n
o
w
n

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

F
i
t

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
N
o
v
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
N
o
v
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
D
e
c

0
6
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

I
n
j
u
r
y
L
e
f
t
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
F
e
b

0
7
M
a
r

0
7
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d

G
e
n
e
r
a
l

p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

k
n
o
w
n

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

i
n

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
h
e
c
k
.
G
o
o
d
(
o
l
d

i
n
j
u
r
y
)
.

N
o
b
r
u
i
s
i
n
g
,

n
o

r
e
c
e
n
t

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r

0
7
I
C
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
A
p
r

0
7
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
G
E
N
E
V

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
M
a
r

0
7
M
a
r

0
7
A
p
r

0
7
M
a
r

0
7
A
I
H
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
?
A
I
H
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

A
I
H
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
?
A
I
H
R
C

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
?
A
p
r

0
7
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

c
h
e
c
k
u
p
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

o
b
s
e
r
v
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l
.
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
K
A
B
U
L

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
e
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

o
r

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
:

G
o
o
d
.

N
o

i
n
j
u
r
i
e
s

i
l
l
n
e
s
s
e
s

d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d

a
t

p
r
e
-
r
e
l
e
a
s
e

m
e
d
i
c
a
l

s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n

c
a
p
t
u
r
e
:

w
o
u
n
d
s
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l

c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n

u
p
o
n
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
:

G
o
o
d
.

M
e
d
i
c
a
l
l
y

f
i
t
,

b
u
t

(
i
n
j
u
r
y
)

d
u
e

t
o

b
e
d

r
e
s
t
.

T
h
e

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

s
p
e
n
t

j
u
s
t

o
v
e
r

t
h
r
e
e

w
e
e
k
s

i
n

t
h
e

R
o
l
e

3

I
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e

C
a
r
e

h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
.
A
I
H
R
C

w
a
s

J
u
n
e
n
o
t
i
f
i
e
d

J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
J
u
n
e
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
J
u
n
e
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
J
u
n
e
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
J
u
n
e
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
J
u
n
e
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
-
0
7
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
J
u
n
e
T
h
e

t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

w
a
s

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
J
u
n
e
J
u
n
-
0
7
J
u
n
e
A
I
H
R
C

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

d
e
t
a
i
n
e
e

n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

Jan-02
Jan-02
Jan-02
Jan-02
Apr-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
Jan-02
Jan-02
Jan-02
Jan-02
Apr-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
Jul-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
Jul-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Sep-06
Sep-06
Sep-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Aug-06
Sep-06
Sep-06
Sep-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Nov-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Nov-06
Nov-06
Nov-06
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Mar-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Mar-07
Nov-06
Nov-06
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Jan-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Apr-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
May-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
Apr-07
Mar-07
Mar-07
May-07
May-07
May-07
May-07
May-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
May-07
May-07
May-07
May-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
Jun-07
US
US
US
US
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS - Released by NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
Released
Released
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
ANP
NDS
(Minor, age is
approximated)
(Minor)
NDS
NDS
Released
Released
Released
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
(Minor)
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
NDS
Released
Released
Released to Mir Weis Hospital
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
(Minor)
(Minor)
Released
Released
Released
Released
Released
Good physical condition
GENEV notified
April 06
General physical
condition upon transfer:
Good
General physical
unknown
General physical
fit
General physical condition
upon transfer:
fit
General physical
fit
General physical condition
upon transfer:
fit
ICRC notified Aug GENEV notified
August
August
August
August
August
August
General physical
fit
General physical
fit
General physical
fit
General physical
fit
General physical
condition upon release:
fit
General physical
fit
General physical
Good/fit for release
General physical
fit for release
General physical
Good/fit for release
August
August
August
August
ICRC notified Sept GENEV notified
August
August
Sept
Sept
Sept
General physical
condition upon
release:
received
medical care
wound
Given medication
ICRC notified Oct GENEV notified
Oct
ICRC notified
Oct
GENEV notified
Oct
ICRC notified
Oct
GENEV notified
Dec
ICRC notified Dec
GENEV notified
Dec
ICRC notified
Dec
GENEV notified
Oct
ICRC notified
Oct
GENEV notified
Oct
ICRC notified
Oct
GENEV notified
Oct
ICRC notified
Oct
GENEV notified
Oct
ICRC notified Oct GENEV notified
Oct
General physical
condition upon
release:
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
condition upon
release:
Good
General physical
Good.
General physical
Good.
General physical
Good.
General physical
Good.
General physical
Good.
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
Good
ICRC notified Dec GENEV notified
Dec 06
ICRC notified Dec
Dec 06
GENEV notified
ICRC notified Jan
Jan 06
GENEV notified
ICRC notified Jan
Jan 06
GENEV notified
ICRC notified Jan 07
Jan 07
GENEV notified
ICRC notified Jan 07 GENEV notified
Jan 07
Jan 07
Jan 07
Jan 07
ICRC notified
Jan 07 GENEV notified
Jan 07
ICRC notified
Jan 07 GENEV notified
Jan 07
Jan 07
Jan 07
ICRC notified Mar 07 GENEV notified
07
07
Mar
Mar
General physical
Good
0
Mar
Mar 07 ICRC notified
GENEV notified
07
Mar
07
General physical
Good
General physical
Good
General physical
General physical
Good
General physical
General physical
Good
General physical
General physical
General physical
General physical
No bruising, no injuries
Following medical
treatment
General physical
treatment
Following medical
General physical
Good physical
condition upon
release:
Fit - no bruises
ICRC notified Mar 077
Mar
GENEV notified
0
Mar
07
Mar
07
Mar
07
Mar
07
Mar
GENEV notified Mar
07
ICRC notified Apr 07
07
GENEV notified Apr
ICRC notified Apr 07 GENEV notified
07
Apr
ICRC notified May 07 GENEV notified
May
ICRC notified Apr 07 GENEV notified
Apr
wound
wound
General physical
Fit - no injuries or
bruises
May
General physical
Fit- no injuries or
May
General physical
condition upon
release:
Fit - no injuries or
bruises
May
General physical
condition: No
bruises or injuries
observed.
May
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
No illnesses or injuries
detected at the pre-
release medical
screening.
KABUL notified
June
June
KABUL notified
bruises
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
No illnesses or injuries
observed.
KABUL notified
June
KABUL notified
June
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
No known injuries or
illnesses.
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
illnesses.
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
illnesses.
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
illnesses.
Physical condition
upon release: Good.
illnesses.
June
June
June
AIHRC not notified
AIHRC not notified
AIHRC not notified
Notification provided by
AIHRC collected detainee
AIHRC collected detainee
June
June
June
June
KPRT
KPRT
KPRT
KPRT
notification
notification
[Canada's preference for a spot check approach to verifying the release of detainees was stated.]
(fewer
than 50)
(fewer
than 40)
(fewer than
15)
(fewer
than 5)
(fewer
than 20)
(fewer
than 20)
(fewer
than 5)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 30)
Governor of Kandahar
the existence of private detention cells in Afghanistan
(fewer than
30)
Prisons non-officielles
le sujet de l'existence possible
de prisons non-officiels
il n'tait pas possible de confronter les informations de l'un et de l'autre.
a presente ces prisons
non-officielles
possibles etablissements de l'etat ou de l'une de ses
agences.
prisons non-officielles se referent
habituellement a des facilites provisoires ou peuvent etre gardees leurs victimes pendant
un certain temps, plutot que des institutions permanentes permettant des incarcerations de
plus longue duree.
sans doute
capacites de detention
semblait uniquement se referer a de
(fewer
than 70)
(fewer
than 40)
(fewer
than 20)
(fewer
than 15)
(fewer
than 15)
(fewer
than 20)
(fewer
than 10)
(fewer
than 10)
(fewer than 100)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 5)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 40)
the existence
of private detention cells in Afghanistan
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 30)
(fewer than 30)
names
(fewer than 40)
the existence of private detention cells in Afghanistan
the lack of information would make
an investigation difficult to conduct
put our concerns and request for an investigation in writing
[The fact that NDS investigation of the status of a specific set of fewer than 30 detainees has been completed and the need for further data
was discussed.]
(It was requested that we)
(It was stated that)
November
nov
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 15)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 15)
?
(fewer than 50)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than
70)
(fewer than
50)
(fewer than
20)
(fewer
than 10)
(fewer than
20)
(fewer than
70)
(fewer than
5)
(fewer than
5)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 10)
(fewer than 40)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 20)
(fewer than 30)
(a senior government office)
(a senior government office)
[This is a form used to conduct interviews with detainees. The interview was conducted in
November, 2007. The form first provides information to the interviewer and explains that the
interviewer should identify himself or herself, state the purpose of the visit and explain that it is not
an interrogation and that results of the visit, including general concerns about the detainee's
treatment, may be shared with Afghan authorities. This information is followed by questions and
handwritten notes of the interview, which include the following information. The detainee stated that
he/she was good. The detainee was aware of the day and had contact with family. The detainee
was allowed outside anytime, all day. The detainee had not been sleeping well because of health
issues.]
[Questions and handwritten notes of the interview with the detainee continue. The detainee experienced
issues with his/her health. The detainee had asked for a doctor, but had not seen one. The detainee had not
received medicine. The detainee said that he/she had peas from the previous day for dinner and that he/she
ate twice a day, usually half bread at lunch and one bread at dinner. The detainee had access to water and
toilet facilities, although commented that there were an insufficient number of toilets. He/she interacted
with other detainees, but explained that due to the number of occupants it was difficult to move within the
cell.]
[Questions and handwritten notes of the interview with the detainee continue. The detainee said that he/
she had been interrogated twice, for several hours in total. The interrogation involved verbal abuse
about family, religion and the holy book, but the detainee was not subject to ill-treatment. The detainee
was concerned about the future and about his/her judicial rights. The detainee did not consent to
specific information being disclosed about his/her personal conditions and treatment to the Afghan
authorities.]
[This is a form used to conduct interviews with detainees. The interview was conducted in November,
2007. The form first provides information to the interviewer and explains that the interviewer should
identify himself or herself, state the purpose of the visit and explain that it is not an interrogation and that
results of the visit, including general concerns about the detainee's treatment may be shared with Afghan
authorities. This is followed by specific questions and handwritten notes of the interview, which include
the following information. The detainee stated that he/she was good. The detainee was aware of the
day and had contact with family, although commented that the contact was too short.]
[Questions and handwritten notes of the interview with the detainee continue. The detainee experienced issues
with his/her health for which a doctor had prescribed medication, but the detainee had not received the
medication. With respect to hygiene, the detainee stated that while there was the opportunity to shower or bathe
once a week, there was no privacy, cold water and limited hours. There was access to toilet facilities, but these
were in poor condition. The detainee stated that he/she did interact with other detainees, but due to the number
of detainees in the cell, it was difficult to move. The detainee had not been told why he or she was detained,
had not seen a lawyer and was not informed about what would happen next. The detainee hoped that the
government of Afghanistan would find that he or she had done nothing wrong.]
[Questions and handwritten notes of the interview with the detainee continue. The detainee said that he/she had
been interrogated twice, for several hours in total. The detainee was not subject to ill-treatment, but stated that
others were tortured. The detainee was concerned about the time he or she would have to wait for due process.
The detainee did not consent to specific information being disclosed about his/her personal conditions and
treatment to the Afghan authorities.]
[Legal and policy issues, capacity building, standard operating procedures, and contingencies in relation to
transfers were discussed.]
[Standard operating
procedures were discussed and compared.]
[Transfer arrangements, detainee treatment and assessments, and contingency plans for any credible
allegations of detainee mistreatment were discussed.]
[Different approaches to detainee monitoring were discussed.]
[The transferring state's versus Afghanistan's responsibility for detainees post-transfer, including
monitoring, was discussed.]
[Transparency in, and challenges to, transfer policies were discussed.]
[Customary international law, humane treatment obligations, and distinctions between law and policy in
risk assessments were discussed. A comment was made relating to the scope of states' legal responsibility
for detainees.]
[Specific detention and training projects were discussed.]
[Other potential projects were
discussed.]
[A methodology was proposed and the current NDS record-keeping system was discussed.]
[Allies' policy frameworks on detainee issues and their post-transfer follow-up mechanisms were discussed.]
(where further
discussion is welcomed.)
December
(< than 70)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 10)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 15)
(< than 20)
(< than 15)
(< than 20)*
(<than 5)*
< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
(< than 5)
*
*
*
*
A
l
l
3
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
i
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
e
d
h
a
d
b
e
e
n
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
i
n
t
e
r
v
i
e
w
e
d
w
h
i
l
e
a
t
N
D
S
K
a
n
d
a
h
a
r
.
[The nature of the evidence, including information relating to
the allegations from a Canadian source, was described.]
[The independent investigation by the Attorney-General and potential prosecution of the suspect
were discussed.]
(including instructions on the treatment of detainees,)
[The best means of managing
and implementing the technical assistance initiatives were discussed.]
Separately, DHOM and I met with ICRC Representative
[A review of transferred detainees was discussed.]
[The tracking of Canadian detainees was discussed.]
[The follow-up rate on Canadian detainees was discussed.]
PANEL OF ARBITERS
Documents Subject to Solicitor-Client Privilege Claims
1. Documents in relation to which claims of solicitor-client privilege have been withdrawn,
in whole or in part
Document No. Page No(s).
POA 0022 8, 35
POA 0050 1
POA 0308 22 (a portion of the 2nd sentence), 42 (2nd
bullet), 47 (heading), 48 (heading), 49
(heading)
POA 0315 1 (Background)
POA 0361 12
POA 0391 18 (1st two and last paras.)
POA 0678 11, 13
POA 0711 102
POA 0755 4
POA 1122 2, 3
POA 1123 3
POA 1155 5-8 (all, other than p. 7, 7th bullet and p.8,
para. 10)
POA 1441 5
POA 1435 2, para. 8
DFAIT 133 1
- 2 -
2. Documents that are the subject of claims of solicitor-client privilege that the Panel has
determined to be well-founded
POA 0009 11
POA 0018 2
POA 0019 1
POA 0023 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
POA 0025 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
POA 0031 1-3
POA 0033 1-2
POA 0035 17
POA 0038 4-5
POA 0039 1-3
POA 0043 1
POA 0044 1, 2, 3
POA 0048 1
POA 0053 1, 2
POA 0054 2
POA 0063 1
POA 0141 2
POA 0175 1-10
- 3 -
POA 176 1-5
POA 0179 1-7
POA 0195 1-2
POA 0199 1
POA 0308 22 (other than a portion of the 2nd sentence),
42 (1st bullet), 46, 47 (other than heading), 48
(other than heading), 49 (other than heading),
96, 97
POA 0315 1 (Discussion)
POA 0325 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10
POA 0327 3
POA 0329 1
POA 0342 1, 7
POA 0362 32
POA 0372 7
POA 0391 4
POA 0394 70, 71, 78
POA 0397 37, 38, 58 (other than 1st sentence), 59 (other
than 1st sentence), 62, 63, 65
POA 0398 51-52
POA 0403 14
- 4 -
POA 0408 2
POA 0409 44, 45, 97, 104, 105
POA 0469 2
POA 0473 All
POA 0674 1
POA 0675 8
POA 0678 35, 37, 38
POA 0684 3
POA 0686 2
POA 0687 1
POA 0692 3
POA 0694 2, 6
POA 0695 2, 13, 15, 34, 56, 63, 67, 72, 76, 80, 82
POA 0697 1
POA 0698 3, 4
POA 0907 1, 2
POA 0921 6
POA 0927 8
POA 0957 1
- 5 -
POA 0960 1
POA 1020 1, 2
POA 1021 1
POA 1024 1, 2
POA 1047 1, 8, 9
POA 1051 1
POA 1104 2
POA 1122 9
POA 1123 2, 4
POA 1125 14, 15, 28
POA 1126 5, 6
POA 1127 32-33
POA 1155 1, 7 (7th bullet), 8 (para. 10)
POA 1172 4
POA 1181 1, 2, 3, 4
POA 1182 1
POA 1195 1, 2, 3
POA 1197 2, 3
POA 1250 2
- 6 -
POA 1253 1
POA 1254 1
POA 1255 2
POA 1268 2
POA 1269 2
POA 1315 1
POA 1318 1
POA 1324 4-10
POA 1344 1, 2
POA 1345 1, 2
POA 1371 1, 2, 3
POA 1390 2
POA 1426 3
POA 1429 2
POA 1432 3
POA 1435 2, para. 7
POA 1441 3, para. 7
POA 1451 10
DFAIT 24 1-13
- 7 -
DFAIT 31 4
DFAIT 120 1
DFAIT 121 1, 2
DFAIT 122 1, 2
DFAIT 123 1, 2
DFAIT 124 1, 2
DFAIT 136 1, 2, 3
DFAIT 137 1, 2, 3
DFAIT 138 1, 2
DFAIT 139 1, 2
DFAIT 140 1, 2
DFAIT 147 13
DFAIT 152 1
3. Documents that are the subject of claims of solicitor-client privilege that the Panel has
determined not to be well-founded
POA 0391 18 (2nd and 3rd paras.)
POA 0397 58 (1st sentence), 59 (1st sentence)
POA 1441 3, para. 8
- 8 -
DFAIT 134 1
DFAIT 135 1
GROUPE DEXPERTS-ARBITRES
Documents assujettis au secret professionnel avocat-client
1. Documents pour lesquels lassujettissement au secret professionnel avocat-client a t
lev en totalit ou en partie
Numro de document Numro(s) de page
POA 0022 8, 35
POA 0050 1
POA 0308 22 (une partie de la 2
e
phrase), 42 (2
e
puce), 47
(titre), 48 (titre), 49 (titre)
POA 0315 1 ( Contexte )
POA 0361 12
POA 0391 18 (deux premiers paragraphes et dernier
paragraphe)
POA 0678 11, 13
POA 0711 102
POA 0755 4
POA 1122 2, 3
POA 1123 3
POA 1155 5-8 (dans leur ensemble, sauf la 7
e
puce la
page 7 et le paragraphe 10 la page 8)
POA 1441 5
POA 1435 2, paragraphe 8
- 2 -
DFAIT 133 1
2. Documents pour lesquels le Groupe a dtermin que lassujettissement au secret
professionnel avocat-client tait fond
POA 0009 11
POA 0018 2
POA 0019 1
POA 0023 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
POA 0025 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
POA 0031 1-3
POA 0033 1-2
POA 0035 17
POA 0038 4-5
POA 0039 1-3
POA 0043 1
POA 0044 1, 2, 3
POA 0048 1
POA 0053 1, 2
- 3 -
POA 0054 2
POA 0063 1
POA 0141 2
POA 0175 1-10
POA 176 1-5
POA 0179 1-7
POA 0195 1-2
POA 0199 1
POA 0308 22 (sauf une partie de la 2
e
phrase), 42
(1
re
puce), 46, 47 (sauf le titre), 48 (sauf le
titre), 49 (sauf le titre), 96, 97
POA 0315 1 ( Discussion )
POA 0325 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10
POA 0327 3
POA 0329 1
POA 0342 1, 7
POA 0362 32
POA 0372 7
POA 0391 4
POA 0394 70, 71, 78
- 4 -
POA 0397 37, 38, 58 (sauf la 1
re
phrase), 59 (sauf la
1
re
phrase), 62, 63, 65
POA 0398 51-52
POA 0403 14
POA 0408 2
POA 0409 44, 45, 97, 104, 105
POA 0469 2
POA 0473 Toutes les pages
POA 0674 1
POA 0675 8
POA 0678 35, 37, 38
POA 0684 3
POA 0686 2
POA 0687 1
POA 0692 3
POA 0694 2, 6
POA 0695 2, 13, 15, 34, 56, 63, 67, 72, 76, 80, 82
POA 0697 1
POA 0698 3, 4
- 5 -
POA 0907 1, 2
POA 0921 6
POA 0927 8
POA 0957 1
POA 0960 1
POA 1020 1, 2
POA 1021 1
POA 1024 1, 2
POA 1047 1, 8, 9
POA 1051 1
POA 1104 2
POA 1122 9
POA 1123 2, 4
POA 1125 14, 15, 28
POA 1126 5, 6
POA 1127 32-33
POA 1155 1, 7 (7
e
puce), 8 (paragraphe 10)
POA 1172 4
POA 1181 1, 2, 3, 4
- 6 -
POA 1182 1
POA 1195 1, 2, 3
POA 1197 2, 3
POA 1250 2
POA 1253 1
POA 1254 1
POA 1255 2
POA 1268 2
POA 1269 2
POA 1315 1
POA 1318 1
POA 1324 4-10
POA 1344 1, 2
POA 1345 1, 2
POA 1371 1, 2, 3
POA 1390 2
POA 1426 3
POA 1429 2
POA 1432 3
- 7 -
POA 1451 10
DFAIT 24 1-13
DFAIT 31 4
DFAIT 120 1
DFAIT 121 1, 2
DFAIT 122 1, 2
DFAIT 123 1, 2
DFAIT 124 1, 2
DFAIT 136 1, 2, 3
DFAIT 137 1, 2, 3
DFAIT 138 1, 2
DFAIT 139 1, 2
DFAIT 140 1, 2
DFAIT 147 13
DFAIT 152 1
- 8 -
3. Documents pour lesquels le Groupe a dtermin que lassujettissement au secret
professionnel avocat-client ntait pas fond
POA 0391 18 (2
e
et 3
e
paragraphes)
POA 0397 58 (1
re
phrase), 59 (1
re
phrase)
DFAIT 134 1
DFAIT 135 1

Ipolitics Afghan Detainees Documents

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Ipolitics Afghan Detainees Documents

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

362 DOCUMENTS RELEASED BY

THE PANEL OF ARBITERS

Вам также может понравиться