Arguments for the vortex theory of matter For almost a decade I have tried to conceive a scientific theory to explain

unif orm the basic structures and fundamental interaction in the Universe. I have bee n fascinated that the matter on its various stages of organization, from atoms a nd molecules to planetary systems and galaxies, suggest the vortex type as prima ry matrix in becoming the objective reality. The rigorous deepening of the cogni tive approach in devising a unitary theory of existence is based on the theorems of Gauss for the gravitational field and the electric field, which evidences th e type of converging and diverging sources, for universal particles that has been interpreted as primordial elements in structuring the existence in the most prof ound level.The universal particles interact with each other only by random colli sions, in which the conservation laws of kinetic energy are respected, and also of the mechanical impulse and the kinetic moment. It can be shown theoretically that the convergent vortex sites are attracting of each other, and the divergen t ones are rejecting with inversely proportional forces to the distance square l aw between them, in other words, is checking the universal law of attraction and the law of Columbus. To explain where disappears, and since where appears the u niversal particles involved in a vortex, it requires a dialectical approach by r eference to the principle of unity and opposition of opposites brought by the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friederich Hegel. The term contrary must be understood as opposing sides and internal trends of the structural elements and processes that coexists but mentally excluding them selves, existence as becoming causes. At the current level of knowledge, these features are fulfilled by the elementar y particles and the corresponding antiparticles. It is known that, to each parti cle it corresponds an antiparticle, having the same mass, but the electric charg es, baryonic and strangeness are the contrary signs. Particles and antiparticles can not exist together because they annihilates each other, turning into energy . So matter and antimatter can exist only in separate Universes. It is natural t o assume that our Universe is dialectical associated with the complementary Univ erse, where the vortex is like a bridge between matter and antimatter (the refl ection in the mirror of the matter). The intuitive understanding difficulties ca n be overcome at the abstract level by extending the theory of relativity to the events that takes place in a four dimensional dual space, sharing the time axes, one way in the past through the present into the future (the principle of causalit y). Is well to remember that the conservation laws of some physical measures all owed an interesting approach in analytical mechanics, being intrinsically linked to the homogeneity and the isotropy related to space and the time, consistency, through the so-called symmetry operations (translation in space, spatial rotati on, translation in time). According to Noether theorem, in an isolated system ea ch symmetry operations corresponds a law of conservation of physical quantities. For example, the invariant Lagrange function from infinitesimal translations in space, the infinitesimal spatial rotations and the infinitesimal translations i n time, result conservation laws of mechanical impulse, angular momentum, resp ectively, mechanical energy. Is a disturbing challenge for theoretical research to emphasize the complete assembly of the symmetry operations to justify all the conservation laws of the microcosm. It should be remembered that the duality of existence is manifested by the ratio of material and an ideal active factor cal led conscience or spirit capable to reflect and to transform the objective reali ty. Opening the vortex theory a philosophical interpretation is very permissive, with the starting point the assumption that any entity in the Universe is a con figuration of universal particles, more or less stable, eventually manifesting a s progressive or stationary wave. The issue is whether there may be a primary in formational entity, that has a total or partial weight in becoming the processes in the Universe. I invite you, dear readers, on the www.voxinventica.com and ww w.praxisinventica.com sites to learn more about the vortex theory of existence. I mention that the versions in English and French were sent to various research institutions abroad answer. Of course, the riddles of knowledge unfolds difficul t I hope that in a confrontation of opinions, innovative ideas are born and the tru th comes out. Just so, we understand who we are, where we came from and where ar e going. Certainly, for the human being, creativity is a genuine way to justify

their existence in the Universe. Now, I am concerned to realize experimental mod els for validating the basic assumptions of the vortex theory. A simple experime ntal device consists of two hallow sphere with walls perforated, connected by ru bber tubes, or other flexible tubes, to a tube provided with tap (for regulating fluid flow) and a pomp that ensure a forced circulation of the fluid through t he system, in a way or another. The interaction forces are approximately propor tional to the product flow and inversely proportional to the square of the dista nce between the vortex. For this purpose, the forces of viscosity should be eval uated as disturbances affecting the measurements. This example is only suggestiv e, because the tourbillion from a fluid differ in meaning from the universal v ortex which is a unitary model to structure the existence, on various levels of organization, from microcosm to megacosmos . The only similarity between the par ticles of a fluid and the universal particles is that they are interacting throu gh collisions. Precise measurements, but more difficult, may be made in space wi th perforated, uniform spheres, filled with a liquid (vacuum vaporization is vir tually instantaneous). I hope to find partners to develop research projects. I l ook forward to your opinions. Tudor Vasile, protelisav@yahoo.com