Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
as a Continuum Between
Musical & Fine Art Practices
J . R,
Abstract
is text explores sound arts relationship to (experimental) music and
fine art, by considering its practices, both historical and contemporary.
First, a brief history of its origins in both fields is given with a view to
providing context. Secondly, the diculty of its definition is discussed and
a broad definition is proposed in light of the aforementioned historical
context. irdly, the examination of a number of cases between sound arts
advent and the present forms part of an argument for the thesis that sound
art is a continuous spectrum between, and formed by the intersection of,
practices in music and fine art.
Contents
Abstract
Introduction
ii
11
List of References
Bibliography
Audio-Visual Resources, Works of Art & Exhibitions
19
Introduction
Sound art is a term which has been given multiple, and sometimes very dierent,
definitions by various parties. e reason that I chose it as a subject for this study is
partly because of a noticeable trend in practitional divide between sound artists who are
rooted in the gallery world of fine-art, and those whose roots lie in musical practice.
Visual artist Susan Philipszs Turner Prizewinning sound installation of traditional
folk songs under river bridges seemed to me a far cry from the trend in much musicrooted sound installation towards noise and generative methods [Polli 1998: 108]. In the
same year, for instance, the musician David Byrne exhibited Playing the Building at the
Roundhouse (London), an intricate installation connected to a variety of the buildingss
architectural structures which mechanically enables visitors to play the venue itself as a
musical instrument. Noticing this dierence prompted a deeper investigation into
practitional and aesthetic trends in both art-informed and music-informed approaches
to sound art, which revealed that not only are dierences in approach widespread, but
they are sometimes a consequence of the belief by theorists that there is, or should be, a
line that can be found between the two [Coulter-Smith: 1.2]. However, sound art has roots
in both fields, and therefore could be seen to be a bridge which draws them, rather than
a territory to be divided.
By reviewing the roots that sound arts aesthetics has in experimental music and
twentieth-century fine art (particularly the history of installation art) and assessing some
examples of contemporary practice on those terms, my aim is to, first, provide a
definition of sound art which encompasses all practice which could be considered sound
art by forming a union of the current diering definitions. To do so, I have referred to
texts by both musical and fine-art theorists and practitioners. Secondly, to investigate the
dierences in practice between sound artists of the music and visual types, and to
explain how these might be reconciled by a better understanding of the common
aesthetics which underpin both.
ii
Chapter 1
.
Extra-Musical Matter in Experimental Music
Clichd though it may be to begin a passage on sound art with a sweeping statement on
the enormity of John Cages role in its development, it is necessary in this case, because
his influence reached far beyond musical practice and into virtually all art forms, not
least fine art. Cages relationship with the visual arts was multidirectional: he both
influenced, and was influenced by, artists from a variety of fields. Two are of particular
Duchamp used the term readymade for this type of found art.
e relevance of Duchamps work to artists in the s may seem a temporal leap. However,
Duchamps Fountain was lost aer its initial exhibition, and it was several decades later between
that he authorized replicas based on photographs of the original.
3 In this text the word musician will be, unless otherwise indicated, inclusive of those sound artists who
may not necessarily call themselves musicians but whose approach one can at least safely assume is
informed by a background of musical practice or theory.
1
2
Whereas Cage advocated a relinquish of control, equally balancing sound with noise and
silence, and order with randomness; Nyman identifies the need to organise relationships
as being key to the approach which held European avant-garde composers back from the
experimental realm: Stockhausen (cited ibid., p.) insisted that using extra-musical
sound matter is acceptable only if one can integrate it and ultimately create some kind of
harmony and balance [] not just expose them and see what happens. Relevant to
sound art is Cages interest in a performances physical space, and particularly the
advantage spatial separation of players he says has, of [allowing] the sounds to issue
from their own [centres] and interpenetrate which is not obstructed by the conventions
of European musical history [Cage 1961(): 184].
Cages interest in Abstract Expressionist painting5 exposed him to a number of
contemporary artists. ough he later influenced Minimalist (visual) art, Cage has made
it clear that it was the art which at least partially informed 4'33" (), and that his
most celebrated piece was particularly insipired by Rauschenbergs series of canvases
entitled White Paintings () [Cage 1978: 9899], a series of uniformly white canvases
presented in four groups (of one panel, three, four and seven panels). Rauschenbergs
sound bite a canvas is never empty [Rauschenberg 1951] supposedly prompted Cage to
write 4'33". Having its origin in visual art provides insight into why the Cagean use of
silence and environmental noise is so readily adaptable via analogy into new media art: it
was a pluralist aesthetic to begin with. One of the most striking things about the White
Paintings in relation to Cages piece is the three-panel group of canvases: three white
surfaces in a row, divided only by the lines created by their separateness. It isor if not,
arguably as close as one could get toa visual transliteration of 4'33"but rather, the
converse is the case: the music is like a sonic transliteration of the painting. Constructed
in three movements, and making use of the musical instruction tacet, 4'33" imports the
elements of chance and extra-musical environmental awareness into a musical form,
and overturns the musical object to insert the listeners presence, not only in space, but
in the moment. is contradiction of traditional expectation, poses a question about the
medium of music,6 reflecting Rauschenbergs direction of the viewer towards the
medium of painted canvas.
Musique Concrtes role is equally important in drawing attention to medium (sound)
rather than gesture (musical construct), and the rise to a widespread use of extraWhich Nyman refers to as the avant-garde, distinct from experimental music
Which he also practised.
6 As do, for instance his works for prepared piano.
4
5
musical sound matter. Pierre Schaeer established the Groupe de Recherche de Musique
Concrte in , using recording technology for both acoustical research and as a
means of composition. Unlike an acoustic sound, a recorded sound could be objectified
and scrutinized,
magnified, repeated, re-recorded, and played back so as to hear all its hidden
and potential details, uncovering the inner dynamic nestled inside every
instant or particle of sound.
LaBelle, , p.
.
e Influence of Minimalist Art
e medium8 of installation is where experimental music and fine art intersect most
predominantly, and thus of primary interest to this study. e Dadaist branch of
Conceptual arts roots informed an artistic approach embracing wider examination of
articles of lifeand the environmental envelope, in pursuit of a more intense engagement
with the outside world and everyday life [Kwon 1997: 43]. Suderburg [2000: 2] describes
installation practice as collectively engaging aural, spatial, visual and environmental
Reduced listening is listening mode distinct from both causal listening, in which we react to sound by
identifying its a source, and semantic listening in which we listen to a particular parametric order which
codifies some kind of message or semiotic (such as spoken language)it is instead a mode of listening
focused on purely sonic qualities [Chion 1994: 2530].
8 Or perhaps, more appropriately, media approach, since it encompasses a broad range of media.
7
Buren claims that this was an opposition to Modernisms ideal that the art object in and
of itself has an absolute meaning 11 (Buren 1971, cited in Suderburg, 2000, p.). However,
Meyer argues that an indirect source of this displacement from work to frame is
Modernist reflexivitya displacement of the object of reflection from the work itself to
the medium of a work, and its tactility. Minimalism displaced this by yet another degree:
from the medium to its space12 [Meyer 2000: 2627]. is implicitly suggests that rather
than opposing Modernism, Minimalism was an evolutionat least in terms of the
resulting phenomenology of a gestalt formed by presence of work and reader in an
integral frame:
Minimal objects redirected consciousness back on itself and the real-world
conditions that ground consciousness. e coordinates of perception were
established as existing not only between spectator and the work but among
spectator, artwork, and the place inhabited by both.
Crimp, 1993, p.
is led to the idea of art as a spectatorial experience, which unfolds in both space and
time, and here lies Minimalisms part as another aesthetic precursor of installation art.
.
e Use of Sound in Installation Art
Installation art developed into a broad umbrella for a variety of practices.13 e
conditions implied by an installation piece as an unfolding spectatorial experience lend
themselves to sound, but the aesthetic reasons for, and the manner of, its use is informed
10
by the underlying ethics of installation.14 is is not to say, however, that installation art
has not been influenced by musical aesthetics, which it most certainly has.
Cages ambition to reflect on musics function and materials is analogous to the selfconsciousness of conceptual art: transcending traditional modes of self-expression, and
enforcing a simultaneity of creation and reaction which elicits a reflection on medium
and situation (in Cages case, respectively sound and music). His take on the artist as not
a literal maker but a decision-maker fore-grounded process. Alongside abstract
expressionists use of dynamic process and spontaneity15 it prefigured the Fluxus
movement and the closely related Happenings and Environments, all seeking to blur
lines between art and life to a point of indistinguishability. Happenings involve staging
actions or events, scripted or unscripted, which collapse the art object as a refined
aesthetic onto the spaces of everyday life, and Environments construct whole artistic
scenes where random material assembles in such a way as to become art, the latter oen
providing a backdrop for the former [LaBelle 2006]. Where Fluxus diers is in its
rejection of the physicality and gestural vocabulary of Abstract Expressionism favouring
instead attentiveness to insignificant phenomena [Haskell 1985: 49]. is combination
of theatricality and environment celebrated art as an immersive experience. is
naturally lends itself to the use of sound, for two reasons: first, sounds inherent
temporality enforces continuous experience rather than static observation. Secondly,
Kahn notes that immersion in noise is guaranteed by the ease through which so much
can be perceived through [noise] [Kahn 2001: 31].16
Sounds explicit temporality can also transport environments between disjoint places.
Recorded sound brings an ongoing sensory element of some environment into a
dierent location, capturing and recreating a spatially enveloping narrative, rather than
merely the snapshot which a static environment provides, or that which a performance
of a dynamic (but intra-environmental) object may [Rimbaud 2001: 66]. Distinction from
the latter is aided by sounds omnidirectional17 propagation through space. Diracting
around barriers which light cannot allows it to both surround the viewer/audience, and
to transmit uninterrupted [Slouka 1999: 41]eyes are drawn between distinct places, but
the ears will hear sound regardless, and thus the perception (i.e. listening) becomes a
passive internalization as opposed to an active physical choice of sensual focus. Finally,
sound really is tactileit is a matter wave comprised of vibrations of real mass,
transmitted to us in a way we feel physically18 providing a means of directly anchoring
the viewer/audiences immersion.
is encapsulation and/or transformation of narrative19 is related to sounds use in
film, which is worth discussing in relation to video installations, though the relationship
between video installation art and cinema is a subject which is not the immediate focus
of this study.20 I will, however, be discussing the relationship between video installation
and sound art in the following chapter.
Hence the importance of the brief history given above.
Such as Jackson Pollocks drip paintings.
16 Noise of course being the sonic component of Haskells insignificant phenomena.
17 Not isotropic or uniform, but usually omnidirectional via acoustic reflection.
18 Not only in the sense that the eardrum feels vibrations, but also through the listening body.
19 at is, an environment with a time-base.
20 It suces to say that to many filmmakers, sound is merely an adjunct to plot and [cinematography], and
has only a supportive role [Gibbs 2007: 8].
14
15
Chapter 2
Gibbs, , p.
ese criteria are helpful, but alone not enough to distinguish sound art from any type of
musicincluding traditional forms.23 Licht, in contrast to Gibbs, says that sound art
belongs in an exhibition situation rather than a performance situationthat
is, I would maintain, a necessary correlative in defining the term
Licht, , p.
Again, in the first category he appears to regard work defined by space as being
something distinct from work defined by time when there are, as I have mentioned,
cases of overlap, particularly when the perception of space changes over time, or vice
versa.25 Whilst Licht does admit that pieces comprising sound alone can be considered
sound art (in his third category), he does so only on the condition that it is created by a
visual artist. is seems an unjustifiably partisan approach, as the [sonic] extension of
the artists particular aesthetic could theoretically be analogous to the aesthetic of a piece
of sound art created by a musician. He acknowledges sound as a central component, but
his emphasis is on the visual arts, in contrast to Gibbs, who stipulates that sound art is
anything which happens to make sounds as a by-product of another activity cannot be
deemed sound art [2007: 11].
Gibbss and Lichts contrasting definitions are illustrative of the aforementioned
battle for sound art; the divide of opinion between musicians and visual artists on its
definition. A comprehensive definition, to encompass all practice of sound art, would
have to be the union of both of the above definitions. David Toop addresses the issue
that Licht fails to, asserting that in sound art, the time base is confined by the
ough I will be arguing that there is no distinct line between sound art and music, we should be wary
of the temptation to say that sound art is inclusive of all music, whichin spite of its abstractly theoretical
basiswould make it both a redundant term and one which is not reflective of its use by practitioners.
24 A sound sculpture being a sculpture that is made with an inherent sound-producing facility in mind or
a machine made for the same purpose [Licht 2007: 199].
25 Take, for example, the Skyspace series of installations by light artist James Turrell, which are rooms
whose interior lighting changes in synchronicity with the sunrise and sunset. It consequentially involves
performances at dawn and dusk, and its space is dependent on time [Yentob 2008].
23
accessibility of the space, rather than the attention span of the audience. is accounts
for the branch of space-oriented sound art which doesnt explicitly engage with space, but
rather creates or relies on an abstract(ed) environment. It must be considered, first,
alongside other means of immersion of the various types discussed in the previous
chapter; secondly, alongside the combination of sound with other media.
On that latter point, it is worth illustrating how sound can be balanced alongside
other media, and which cases can be considered to constitute sound art. For instance,
from a purely textual perspective, it seems that video installations can be divided into
three broad categories with regard to their use of sound, which are listed here in
decreasing order of audio-visual interdependence:
1. at where sound is a component, or a direct or indirect artefact of the film
matter (or indeed vice versa). is includes any sound which would be
accepted by the viewer, according to a cultural understanding of cinematic
convention, as part of the film, such as a musical soundtrack.
2. at where sound is neither a component nor a by-product of the film
matter but is subsidiarily related to its temporality and/or narrative
structure (for instance, a sound which is spatially displaced from a film (or
number of simultaneously running distinct films) but accompanies it (or
them) to create a narrative.
3. at where the sound is not subsidiary to the film matter, but both are
mutually independent components of an art work in which their individual
structures and/or temporalities combine to provide a resulting environment
which is the synergy of the viewers contextual perception of each
component (perhaps among others).
According to both Gibbs [2007] and Kahn [2001], only the third category would qualify
as sound art, sound playing at most a subsidiary role in the first two.
.
A Prototypal Definition
As a consequence of the points made in ., we can use a union of Gibbss and Lichts
diering definitions by taking an intersection of their most general criteria, aided by
Toops more inclusive description of the use of spatiality. As there are a number of ways
in which sound art can involve extra-musical matter, there are a number of branches.
But they are all united by the underlying use of sound as a key conceptual component. I
thus propose the following definition as one which encompasses the widest possible set
of forms26 which can be considered sound art:
S A fulfils all three of the following criteria :
1. It seeks to communicate through sound, by
1.A. actively emitting sound, or
1.B. involving the perception of an active or present sound.
26
3.B.
3.C.
3.D.
is broader definition contains both that which is intersection of music and fine art,
and that which pertains to the extensions of either one or the other. In the following
chapters, I shall discuss the dierences and mutualities of practices rooted in both
established idioms with reference to elements of the above definition.
27
Chapter 3
11
and the latter on the poietic/tactile quality of sound [Tagg 2010: 103]that which one
might call cra. Whereas visual art requires the audience to look, an active process,
sound can be used to be absorbed by either passively hearing or actively listening, and
music has its historical basis in organising sound to invoke the latterthe cra of
focusing the attention of the audiencethe musician as an architect of sounds [Schafer32
1973: 30]. Even in music of Cagean open form, or for instance ambient music, emphasis
is still on somehow shaping sound to alter ones experience in a context defined by
extra-musical matter, the development of the texture of sound itself as a focus for
compositional attention [Eno 1996: 95; Eco 1989: 168]; immersion in sound, rather than
sound as a reflection upon some other medium, the latter of which is the focus of artists
such as Philipsz. is treatment of sound is a trait of the musical need to tame and
control noise in some way, a sentiment expressed in the e Art of Noises: Futurist
Manifesto [Russolo 1986]. e tendency towards cra of sound sometimes results in
musicians mistrust of the ability of the fine arts community to understand the material
quality of sound, particularly on a technical level:
We still think of museum galleries as nineteenth-century galleries, like, How
do we hang this on the wall, how do we light it? But nobody knows anything
about sound [] ere isnt that kind of knowledge and expertise in the
museum world.
MarClay, cited in Licht, , p.
Perhaps it is for this reason that, whereas site-specificity is inherently assumed in galleryrooted sound art, there is more variance in musically-informed sound art, which sees
wider distribution in forms which can be received in a number of situations (MarClay,
cited ibid., p.11). Arguably this can be accredited to the fact that, with the widespread use
of recorded sound in installations, its respective musically-rooted practitioners advocate
a preservation of the Schaeerian aesthetic that sound alone can create an immersive
environment, rather than relying on any particular space. us in contrast to galleryrooted sound art, some sound artists such as Francisco Lopz consider that work
distributed on CD (for example) does not disqualify it from being sound art; dismissing
the notion that site-specificity or emphasis on presence (via spontaneity or otherwise)
are prerequisites for classification, as puerile and futile attempts at an unnecessary
transgression from established forms [Lopz 1996]. Naturally, these standpoints lie at
extremes of a spectrum.
.
e Site-Specificity Spectrum
Clearly, Lopzs stance is a divisive one not reflective of the gamut of approaches to
presentation of sound that is found in the work of contemporary musically-rooted sound
artists. ere is no intrinsic reason that site specificity should necessarily detract from
the poietic qualities of soundjust in the same way that, as Lopz himself says, reduced
listening doesnt negate what is outside the sounds but explores and arms all that is
inside them [Lopz 2001: 8283]. As discussed in ., spatiality and site-specificity can
be used in a number of dierent ways for dierent aesthetic reasons. Xenakiss
architecturally informed composition Terretektorh () involved scattering the
32
orchestra among the audience, so that each is within the other (Xenakis, cited in
Matossian, 1986, p.), creating a Cagean immersion tear[ing] down the psychological
and auditive curtain that separates [the audience] from the players [Xenakis 2003]. is,
and similar recent examples such as the Birmingham Opera Companys immersive
production of Verdis Othello (Vick, ), use spatial immersion not so much as a
contextual reference to the site, but as a means of increasing audience immersion in the
music (and in the latter case, the drama) itself. Along with Xenakiss architecturallydriven interest in spatiality [LaBelle 2006: 183192], this brings to the fore the most easily
identifiable unity of the visual/physical approach to spatiality in sound art as an omnisensory immersion with musical practice: the concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk [Dove
1994: 281]. Michael Fried is reported as having characterized the spectatorial aspect of
installation art as the distinction between art and theatre (Fried, cited in Meyer, 2000, p.
26). But should there be a distinction at all? e blurring of this line between static art
and performance is a central to the ethics of installation art, and even more relevant to
the incorporation of sound matter, whose intrinsic temporality is far more explicit than
that implied by the aforementioned perceptual displacement described by Meyer (q.v.
.)actively enforcing, rather than passively reflecting, a perceived passage of time.
Site specificity is a more complex idea than it may at first seem, leading to a range of
dierent applications. A sound may be tailored to a site to create particular environment,
but it may equally be reliant on the properties of whatever site it is being performed in
(as is '", for instance). Janek Schaefers33 Recorded Delivery () was an installation
in a storage facility which consisted of the amplified recording of a package concealing a
Dictaphone which was sent through the U.K. postal system [Schaefer 1995]. e package
was addressed to be delivered to the room in which the installation was taking place.
us the piece was site-specific, on a conceptual basis. e sound of the recording itself
would not have evoked anything particular to the space in which it was received by the
audience, i.e. its sonic qualities did not have an audible relationship to its environment
(it could have been easily addressed to, and installed in, any other space without any
dierence to the poietic perception of the piece), but rather a referential one which
requires prior knowledge of the concept on the part of the audience. e piece does
however, create an environment which transforms its spatial frame by immersing the
entire room inside the package. at is to say, it translates the sonic narrative of the
interior space of the package during its journey onto the installations space. By doing so,
it puts the audience inside a sonic and spatial emulation34 of a environmental narrative
otherwise impossible for humans to inhabit. is is a more subtle use of space, lying inbetween the work of artists such as Philipsz, and the completely non-site specific work of
Chris Watson. e latter is a phonographer specializing in natural history, who, like
Schaefer, has created works which place the listener in an acoustic space which would be
physically impossible to inhabit. His piece Vatnajkull () is a recording made by
microphones embedded in an ice floe as it gradually cracks, melts and moves as part of
its natural process. However, Watsons work does not rely on any form of site-specificity
in its presentation, being distributed instead as binaural recordings on CD intended for
headphone listening [Toop 2004: 58]. Instead of transforming a physical installation space
into a simulation of another spaces acoustic narrative, he instead imports the latter
directly into the listeners internal sonic azimuth, recreating a real environment as an
33
34
entirely virtual one. Regardless of its presentation as music, Watsons work also qualifies
as sound art, as it invokes a virtual immersion, occupying the listeners head space
which Schafer [1973: 35] describes as a geography of the mind, which can be reached by
no telescope. However, it is also an immersion experienced privately, and as a result
intensifies the (lone) presence of the listener. Schafer goes on to say that
when sound is conducted directly through the skull of the headphone
listener, he is no longer regarding events on the acoustic horizon; no longer
is he surrounded by a sphere of moving elements. He is the sphere. He is
the Universe.
Schafer, , p.
Both Watsons and Schaefers work combine the Cagean concepts of environmental
immersion with a Schaeerian focus on reduced listening.
Another sound art form which combines the contrasting elements of Cagean and
Schaeerian aesthetics is the sound walk, in which the listener follows a route with the
intention of reduced listening to the constantly moving environmental sound matter as
they move through it [Chambers 1994]. e relationship between time and space
becomes more complex, as in this case, not only is the time-base of the piece reliant on
the accessibility of space (q.v. .), but also vice versa, since it is dependent on the
movement of the listener. Akio Suzuki created Sound Place () by walking into the
city and grating a symbol on the wall at any spot where he found an interesting sound,
then providing maps with those locations. Note how close Suzukis piece fits with the
concept of Environments (q.v. .). e relationship between time, space and listener
becomes further complicated when considering the works of Janet Cardisound walks
accompanied by an audio recording of a narrator/guide alongside ambient sounds
recorded along the same path that the listener is directed. is combines the listeners
external sensory sphere with their internal head space, and merges two temporally
dierent narratives (past and present) of the same space to a point that the listener
becomes unsure whether [certain ambient sounds] are part of the CD recording or
happening as real-time events [Toop 2004: 122]. Rather than utilising an entirely physical
one, or creating an virtual space, it augments the reality of the former with the narrative
of the latter. It also partly inverts the relationship between space and time: the time-base
is closed on a macro scale (by the recorded directions), but controlled by the listeners
movement on a micro scale, which demonstrates rather well the fluid nature of the
relationship between space and time in sound art.
.
Erasing the Line:
Underlying Mutualities
Whereas artists such as Lopz polarise themselves against fine art by taking a strict
Schaeerian stance (q.v. .), the Cageans who embrace non-sonic matter and
emphasis on presence are treated with hostility from some theorists at the extreme of the
fine-art end of the spectrum. Many misconceptions about sound art and experimental
music being distinct stem from a lack of acknowledgement that sound art as an idiom in
its own right was prefigured by a number of separate developments. Whilst there may be
a distinction between sound art and experimental music, there is much overlap. Licht
14
[2007: 12] describes, admittedly partly accurately, a tendency to apply the label sound
art to any experimental music of the second half of the twentieth century, particularly
to John Cage and his descendants and argues that, on the contrary, Cage was concerned
with music as the organisation of soundthat all sounds can be used by composers as
musictherefore still thinking in terms of music. In other words, Cage considers sound
to be a means of an expanding an existing art form, rather than the basis for a new one.
e rather facile distinction that Licht makes misses an important aforementioned point:
that sound art existed before it had a name, as the total intersection of what its pioneers
originally considered extensions of dierent practices. us Cages conception of sound as
an extension of music does not necessarily exclude it from being considered as sound
art. Conversely, the common thread running through Modernist reflexivity, Minimalism
and installation art, each of which is an extension of the previous (q.v. .), is well
demonstrated by Mark Rothkos later work (in his post-multiform era), which draws on
ethics from all three of these. e textural nature of his monolithic paintings embraces
the poietic perception of a tactile artistic object, which itself immerses the viewer [Sta
2010]. Being devoid of any representation or symbolism, they draw upon the Minimalist
aesthetic, possessing what Barris calls their own life force [Barris 2010]. What Barris
appears to mean by this is that they exist as objects with a dynamic relation to their
spatial frame, rather than as static, self-contained objects within it. Rothko
acknowledged this, saying that space itself is the chief plastic manifestation of the artists
conception of reality [Rothko 2004: 59]. He donated the Seagram Murals to the Tate
Gallery on the condition that they be hung in a precise way, in a room matching his
exact specifications, with a specific type of lighting [Jones 2002]. is awareness is in
keeping with the Minimalist ideal of the art objects frame being part of the reception,
but rather than employing a displacement from the poietic aspect to a (found)
environment, it is instead an extension from the former to the (craed) latter, retaining
the objects physicality and tactile presence whilst also invoking spatial immersion, as
well as implicit temporality:
Whatever relationship was now to be perceived was contingent on the
viewers temporal movement in the sphere shared with the object.
Crimp, , p.
us it may be argued that poietically static visual art is thus no less capable of invoking
a spectatorial presence. Furthermore, Minimalist arts extension of Modernist reflexivity
suggests a logical progression to art with explicit temporal narrative. Again, this neednt
negate any emphasis on medium or space, but can rather enact a further extension. For
instance, Anthony McCalls light sculpture Line Describing a Cone . () projects
light into a mist-filled space to create the illusion of touchable light [McCall, 2010], thus
emphasising both medium and space in a piece with a strict time-base.
Light art is a practice which shares many analogies with sound art due to sharing a
fundamentality of medium [McLuhan 1989: 67]. Light is the fundamental medium
through which visual art is communicated, just as sound35 is to music. is direct
analogy is illustrated well by two examples which are, bar the dierence in medium,
identical in their aesthetic. James Turrells recent work Bindu Shards () is a timed
piece of work which can be viewed one person at a time, encapsulated by an enclosure
with a pitch black interior which closes o all external senses, and comprises a rapid
35
or rather, technically, the vibration of matter whose frequency is within detectable range
15
display of white light patterns inside the enclosure. It employs a use of a single pure
medium in its simplest form filling an isolated immersive space [Turrell 2010] in the
same way that Ryoji Ikedas Matrix does. e latter is an installation for anechoic36 room,
which fills a visually and acoustically blank isolated space with complex patterns of pure
sine tones [Toop 2004: 1114]. Noteworthily, Turrells visual piece is presented insilence,
and Ikedas in a darkened room. Glitch extends the Cagean aesthetic of reflection on
medium of sound production by emphasising artefacts the recording process, and
Ikedas anechoic sine-tone piece in particular calls upon our lack of everyday experience
of pure tone [Cowell n.d./2008]. First this is an example of a direct analogy between the
medium-to-space extension of installation art and a musical equivalent, and thus a
common underlying conceptual basis. Secondly, Ikedas piece is music, but it is also
sound art, just as the performative aspect of Turrells does not detract from its validity as
a piece of visual/fine art. Sound art is thus something that can also be music, as in the
case of Cage or Ikeda, and something that can also rely heavily on other sensory
elements, as in the case of Philipszs work.
A dierent, and notable representation of space through sound is Alvin Luciers I Am
Sitting in a Room (), which recursively iterates a recording in an acoustic space.37 It
gradually strips away the original sound source and intensifies the resonant quality of
the room, resulting in an acoustic representation of the space in which it was recorded.
As a piece of experimental music, it is not site-specific in its presentation, but uses a
specific space as its source:
is slight shi overturns the sound source as a single object of attention, as
a body of sound, and brings aurality into a broader field of consideration by
introducing the contextual. Sound not as object, but as space.
LaBelle, ,
It is creates a specific space whilst not requiring presentation within any particular kind
of space, physical or abstract, and demonstrates the possibility for sound art38 to be
collapsed onto a medium which is poietically identical to experimental music.
Finally, Byrnes Playing the Building () is one work in particular which fully
demonstrates that sound art is a continuum in-between, and inclusive of, subsets of
music and fine art, by inhabiting both. It involves a (musical) keyboard (which the
audience is invited to play) centred inside a large chamber, each key of which activates
devices
attached to the building structure [] metal beams, pillars, heating pipes
[] e devices do not produce sound themselves, but they cause the
building elements to vibrate, resonate and oscillate so that the building itself
becomes a very large musical instrument.
Byrne,
In doing so, if fuses not only both site as concept and as a spatial listening environment,
but also as a means of producing sound itself (as opposed to merely a frame in which to
observe it). It is both the work itself and the frame, the two becoming indistinguishable.
Devoid of any acoustic reflection, without reverb.
A recording of Luciers voice was made in room, and the amplified sound of it being played back in the
same room was re-recorded. is process was repeated.
38 at is, a particular type of sound art.
36
37
16
.
An Interdisciplinary Continuum
(Concluding Remarks)
I hope that the above discussion of examples has illustrated how diering aesthetics in
sound art lie on a continuum, rather than simply belonging to distinct camps. e
aesthetic influences of musically-based and visually-based works vary in a manner much
more complex than that described by either Licht or Gibbs. Both Philipsz and Byrnes
works draw on dierent eects of, but are both united by, Cagean immersion and
presence. e trend among musicians to avoid the use of traditional music is counterreflected by visually-based artists liberal use of it. So bizarrely, the experimental music
identityin the realm of sound artbecomes the one which narrows practice rather
than broadening it. e converse applies to the visual arts in relation to their emphasis
on the necessity of a visual/physical element rather than a virtual or abstracted one.
ese dierences exist in practice, but beneath the surface remains a strong mutual vein
of historical basis in immersive conceptuality.
e analogies between Ikedas and Turrells work reflect just how closely linked each
fields practices of medium emphasis can be. Whilst Schaefers Recorded Delivery is a sitespecific work, it may be performed anywhere, as is the case with Watsons work, and
many other phonographists. A piece of sound art can reflect on an environment without
necessarily needing to be installed in its location [Sansom 2011]. Visual works which can
exist beyond physical boundary (via lossless reproduction)for instance a photograph
are not disqualified as art, so why should a sound recording be for not being tied to
some kind of visual anchor? e implications from the two sides of each others field
seems to be that visual/spatial media facilitate immersion in music, and sonic/temporal
media enable it in visual art. In which case, the real issue is that of an omni-sensory
approach, which belongs not to one field or the other, but to both.
17
Sound art is thus not necessarily the battleground that Gibbs describes, because it is
not a discrete field in-between and/or distinct from music and art. Rather, it can exist
entirely within both, it extends both, and it intersects bothsometimes simultaneously.
It is not a battleground but rather a bridge, a middle-ground for mediating expression
in either and/or both. And all of its focal parameters, which I outlined in . (spatiality,
medium, immersion, interactivity, etc.) are not binary decisions to be made by the artist,
but rather they are continuously variable in both execution and reception, on various
poietic axes, as the examples in . illustrate. ere will always be partisan stances on
aesthetics and practice, since polar ends are an inevitable property of any linear
spectrum. But, as aforementioned, dierences in creative treatment of sound and vision
may simply stem from our culture of mostly separating the study of musical practice
from art practice:
this can become problematic when preconceptions rely on [] models
based on the way things used to be [] when [music was] narrowly defined.
Young, , p.
ese need not be disposed, but could be supplemented with a wider teaching of
practice in the space between. e two fields might then be able to give up the notion
that there exists (or that there should exist) a line between musically-informed and fineart informed approaches to sound artwhich, I hope this text has substantiated, is
certainly not the case. Perhaps more importantly, breaking down this barrier in the way
creative practice is taught and understood could prompt a shi towards more open and
more extensively embraced interdisciplinary pluralism.
18
List of References
Chion, Michel, : Audio-Vision: Sound on Screen,
trans. Claudia Gorbman, (New York: Columbia
University Press).
Bibliography
Attali, Jacques, /: Noise and Politics, in
Christoph Cox, and Daniel Warner, eds.,
Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music
(New York: Continuum), pp..
Citations for this hypertext book will reference chapters and sections (the latter of which are presented on single
webpages) as listed in the web sites table of contents and chapter heads.
39
19
20
Audio-Visual Resources,
Works of Art & Exhibitions
Byrne, David, : Playing the Building, interactive
installation, Roundhouse, London.
Cage, John, : '", for piano.
Duchamp, Marcel, : Fountain, Society of
Independent Artists, New York.
Lucier, Alvin, : I Am Sitting in a Room, CD. Lovely
Music, .
McCall, Anthony, : Line Describing a Cone 2.0, film
projection / light sculpture, Tate Modern,
London.
Morris, Robert, : Box with the Sound of its Own
Making, sound sculpture, exh. , Green
Gallery, New York.
Philipsz, Susan, : Lowlands, sound installation, :
George V Bridge, and Caledonian Railway
Bridge, and Glasgow Bridge, Glasgow. : Tate
Britain, London.
21