Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I. The “Ideal”
• State: viewed society as self contained groups with specific social roles and
privileges
-Men were representatives of the King and the state within the family
-The Siete Partidas established that the adult male ruled his wife and children
with the support of the law. Fathers had parental power—which is the rights that
family heads exercised over family members and their property.
-Under this principle, fathers and husbands enjoyed the fruit of their family
property and imposed their will by legal authority and physical punishment if
necessary.
• Children: There were sharp distinctions between the rights of legitimate and
illegitimate children
-The law protected children conceived within a legal marriage while those outside
legal unions did not enjoy the same rights.
-Adultery was condemned, since is interfered with the transfer of material goods
to the children who were product of legal marriages and created economic
conflicts.
-Endogamy: children were expected to marry within their social and racial class to
ensure the continuation of family social status and wealth.
1
2
-A “true woman” was expect to have the virtue of virginity and chastity, but since
she was considered fragile, ignorant, and weak, she required a male guardian over
her morality.
-By ensuring that each citizen knew what rank her or she occupied or was
born into, the state tried to maintain social hierarchies and avoid conflicts.
• Women’s rights
4. Usually, in order to decide how the law would be applied, it was necessary
to ascertain whether the woman in question was decent and virtuous rather
than a woman of low esteem.
5. Since poor women had to work outside the home and were not usually
under the surveillance of a man, it was difficult to defend their decency.
Women who worked in the streets were likely to have their honesty
2
3
If a male was found guilty of the charge of estupro, he could have half of
his wealth confiscated, could be publicly lashed, or exiled for five years.
In most cases men were never found guilty because of lack of evidence.
According to both the Church and the state, if the woman was not virtous,
the crime would become a simple fornication, which carried no major
punishment.
The message: sexual offense could be permitted against women who were
not virtuous according to ecclesiastical and secular norms.
If the woman was not a virgin, a virtuous widow or a married woman, then
the sentence would be lenient and based on the judge’s criteria, not on the
letter of the law.
The message: The fate of the aggressor depended on the sexual conduct of
the woman.
Parental power could only be exercised by fathers and this right could only
end by death, being sent into exile or jail for committing an offense, or by
legal emancipation.
3
4
Cruel punishment on the part of a father could make their children take
him to court to demand legal emancipation and his wife could sue him for
a temporal separation of the bed and board.
These cases were hard to prove because there were no guidelines to
determine extreme physical punishment, and most of these incidents
occurred in the privacy of the home, hence, creating no evidence.
His promiscuity was not to be punished like a woman’s because he did not
bring—in his body—extraneous children to the family as females did.
Men did not need to be responsible for the children that they brought into
the world, since the law established that paternity could only be
demonstrated by the father’s recognition or by proving that he lived in
concubinage with the child’s mother.
While females were considered fragile and weak, they were accountable
for controlling the sexual passions of men, who, in theory, were
considered more prudent, intelligent, and physically able than their female
counterparts.
-Women occupied a key social position under Spanish secular law because
of their capacity to preserve and reproduce social status and the social
structure of society
-The marital society would not continue if one were not subordinated to
the other, just as there would be no order if the padre de familia and his
family were not subordinated to the king.
4
5
• Patriarchal power was limited, the system did not work well in Latin
America.
Why?