Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared By:
DREAM MEARCHENTS
Tahia Nawar Ayesha Parven Mahmuda Zaman ID# 09.01.02.103 ID# 09.01.02.105 ID# 09.01.02.115
Letter of Transmittal
July 12, 2011 MS. Nusrat Jahan Chaity, Lecturer, School of Business, Ahsanullah University of Science & Technology. Subject: Letter of Transmittal. Respected Madam, We would like to thank you for giving us an assignment of preparing a realistic paper work for our Money & Banking Course, Course No. BBA-315. Without your help and advice it was impossible for us to prepare these answers. Your help and advice has made our work much easier. While preparing this assignment we got to know various new aspects of performance evaluation, ratio analysis, banking sector, their works & internal & external performances etc. which have increased our analyzing skills. It is a matter of great pleasure that our assignment is a result of team work and we are really grateful to you for giving a chance to form our group & charging up our team spirit. We will be indebted to you if you have a look on our assignment and consider our faults and let us know the way to make it better and more effective.
Tahia Nawar Deya Ayesha Parven Mahmuda Zaman Sharmin Rahman Afrina Islam Mehnaz Muna -
Acknowledgement
This report is an output of the study on Performance Evaluation of HSBC Bank instructed by Ms. Naznin Sultana Chaity, Lecturer of Ahsanullah University of Science & Technology (AUST). At the very beginning we thank Almighty Allah for the successful completion of this report. We owe a lot to many people during the writing of this report. Our deepest thanks and gratefulness goes to our respected madam Ms. Naznin Sultana for guiding and helping us to do the assignment. She has taken a lot of pain to go through the report and correct it as and when needed. We like to express our thanks to the Dean of School of Business, AUST for his kind help. We also extend our thanks to all our well wishers.
Table of Contents
Properties
Letter of Transmittal Acknowledgement
Page No.
Part I- Introduction Origin of the Report Objective of the Report Flow of Methodology Limitations
Part IV- Findings & Analysis Liquidity Analysis Profitability Analysis Operating Efficiency Asset Quality Market Position
Executive Summery
HSBC Bank is one of the leading banks in the worlds banking sector. For the performance evaluation of this worlds local bank, we have used the ratio analysis process in this report. This is the most fruitful way to evaluate a banks performance. For this reason we have discussed the definition of performance evaluation and ratio analysis in literature review, the second part of the report. We have used liquidity ratio, profitability ratio, efficiency ratio, asset quality ratio and market. Within these ratios cash position indicator, security position indicator, deposit composition ratio and temporary investment ratio in liquidity ratio; return on equity, return on asset, net interest margin ratio, net profit margin ratio, equity multiplier ratio in profitability ratio; operating efficiency ratio in efficiency ratio; provision for loan loss in asset quality ratio are discussed here. We discuss the companys profile in part three. In part four we analyze the ratios from the data collected of 2005-2010 from the annual report of the bank and interpret them according to their results. In part five there are some recommendations for the management of the bank to make more profit and then the conclusion. Without these we have also discussed the origin of the report, objective of the report, methodology and the limitation in part one.
PART I
INTRODUCTION
Flow of Methodology:
The methodology of this report consisted of developing an analysis based on the ratio calculation of HSBC Bank. Data Collection: The ratios were calculated by using the data collected from the annual report of 20052010 of the particular bank. Data Analysis: Analysis was done according the relevant topic. Interpretation and Recommendation: Interpretation and recommendation are given according to the result of the ratios, which is better for the bank. Others: We also have taken the help of text book, newspapers and website of the particular bank and follow the class lecture.
Limitations:
The report accuracy is minimized due to some limitations. The unavoidable limitations are as follows: Accuracy of Analysis:
The quality of information in this study is limited as the basis of data is taken from a delicate source. All of the data had to be taken from the secondary sources i.e, Annual Reports and the website. Shortage of Data: The notes of 2005 annual report were not found. So the Temporary Investment Ratio of the bank could not be done.
Part II
Literature Review
Performance Evaluation:
This is the way to evaluate the banks performance by calculating the financial ratios.
Financial Ratio:
Financial ratios are constructed by forming ratios of accounting data contained in the banks Reports of income (i.e., profit and loss statement) and condition (i.e. balance sheet).
Ratio Analysis:
Ratio Analysis is the starting point for developing the information desired by a financial analyst. Now the ratios used in this report are described following:
Liquidity Ratios:
1. Cash Position Indicator:
The ratio indicates a banks ability to handle immediate cash needs. The higher the ratio the better the liquid position of the bank. It is calculated as followsCash Position Indicator = cash & due from other bankTotal Asset
2. Return on Asset:
ROA measures the efficiency with which the company is managing its investment in assets utilizing them to generate profit. It measures the amount of profit earned relative to the firms level of investment in total assets. The higher the percentage is better, because that means the company is doing a good job using its assets to generate sales. The equation for ROA isROA = Net IncomeTotal Assets
Net Interest Margin (NIM) is a measurement of the difference between the interest income generated by banks or other financial institutions and the amount of interest paid out to their lenders. It examines how successful a firms investment decisions are compared to its debt situations. A negative value denotes that the firm did not make an optimal decision, because interest expenses were greater than the anount of returns generated by investments. The equation for NIM isNIM = Total Interest Income-Total interest expenseAverage earning Asset
Efficiency Ratios:
Market Position:
1.
own stock for treasury stock, employee stock option plans (ESOP), and other purposes. One effect of such purchase is to increase EPS.
2.
Part III
Company Profile
Organizations name:
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC).
General Background:
Opened first Bangladesh branch in December 1996 Network of 13 offices, 39 ATMs, 9 Customer Service Centres, an offshore banking unit, and offices in 7 EPZs.
Personal Banking Commercial Banking Corporate & Institutional Banking HSBC Net Trade & Supply Chains Payments & Cash Management Custody & Clearing Investment Banking & Markets Treasury & Capital Markets Amanah
Vision of HSBC:
Bringing together people that make a difference.
Value of HSBC:
To exceed customer expectations in service quality. To be a pioneer in the implementation of technologies those create distinction for its customers, employees and shareholders. To keep its reliability at the utmost level with the contribution of its strong capital structure and liquid assets. To make a positive contribution to the community To respect meritocracy during hiring processes, improving knowledge and skills of its employees, creating the mostly preferred work environment.
PART IV
Ratio Analysis:
Liquidity Ratio:
Item Cash Balance with other Bank Money at Call & Short Notices
3035
1685
905
850
400
140
Total Asset
81538.35
69350.33
64583.72
55533.29
41741.92
31209.8
0.172322
0.158555
0.130366
0.146614
0.154397
0.184088
17.2322 1
15.855 53
13.0365 8
14.661 39
15.43973
18.40883
Interpretation:
From the graph we can see cash position was maximum in 2005. Then it falls gradually upto 2008. This indicates that the bank is shrinking its asset as cash rather they are investing them.
From 2009 the cash position was again increasing. In 2010 it is 17.23% i.e the bank has the sufficient liquidity position than the previous year. This means they have enough cash in their hand for liquidate but in the long run it may causes problem. Because this cash are not creating any interest or other income.
8.30659 4
26.5090 2
16.0036 6
4.41834 1
7.73009 5
7.6932 89
Interpretation:
From the above information we can see, Government Securities in 2007 falls than 2005 and 2006. Again in 2008 and 2009 it increases much. That means the company is investing maximum in government securities. They can liquidate these securities any time easily. After that in 2010 again it decreases. This means the company is investing more in risky areas. This may cause problem if they need immediate liquidity
. 3. Deposit Composition Ratio = Demand DepositTime Deposit = Current Account & Other AccountsSavings
Deposits+Term Deposits
34163.1 1
0.1833 96
21019.9 7
0.5149 1
17838.9 7
0.2739 29
12621.0 5
0.2824 24
56.194 78
33.341 73
18.339 58
51.491 01
27.392 98
28.242 43
Interpretation:
The Deposit Composition Ratio of HSBC Bank decreases in 2006 than 2005. That means the bank is collecting more deposits. Again it increases in 2007 and falls in 2008 and then gradually increases in 2009 and 2010. This means the fund collection process of the bank fluctuates randomly. In 2010 the Bank has less stability in deposit than 2009. That gives them a less interest income which is important in giving loan. 4. Temporary Investment Ratio = Investment1Yr+Due from other
BankTotal Asset
2010
4615.27
2009
17306.7
2008
9958.66
2007
2086.51
2006
3325.71
1685
905
850
400
69350.3 3
64583.7 2
55533.2 9
41741.9 2
0.09382 4
0.27385 2
0.16821 1
0.05287 8
0.08925 6
9.38241 9
27.3851 6
16.8210 5
5.28783 7
8.92558 4
Interpretation:
The above information shows that the Temporary Investment Ratio decreases in 2007 than 2006. Again it increases in 2008 and 2009 respectively. This means the liquidity position of the bank is increasing. In 2010 again it decreases. This represents that the liquidity position of the overall bank was maximum in 2009. And in 2010 the liquidity position of the bank falls than 2009.
Profitability Ratio:
1. Return on Equity = Net IncomeTotal Shareholders'Equity
Interpretation:
The above information shows a increasing and a stability of ROE Ratio. This means the company has a strong capacity to return the money of the investors. The company has maximum ROE Ratio in 2010. This may attract the investors to invest in the company.
2010
2614.35
2009
2520.69
2008
1937.36
2007
1703.53
2006
1216.79
2005
861.23
Total Asset
81538.3 5
69350.3 3
64583.7 2
55533.2 9
41741.9 2
31209.8
ROA
0.03206 3
0.03634 7
0.02999 8
0.03067 6
0.02915
0.02759 5
3.20628 3
3.63472
2.99976 5
3.06758 3
2.91503 1
2.75948 6
Interpretation:
The ROA Ratio of HSBC increases in 2006 and 2007 respectively than 2005. That represents the bank is utilizing its assets in making profit. Again it falls in 2008 and increase rapidly in 2009. Again in 2010 it falls a little bit. This means the company gains its highest profit using assets in 2009 and in 2010 the amount of using asset reduces some extent.
3. Net Interest Margin Ratio = Total Interest Income-Total Interest ExpenseAverage Earning Asset
2010
4589.77
2009
4593.95
2008
4931.28
2007
3988.7
2006
3052.09
2005
2401.37
1877.68
2214.26
2219.62
1811.46
1398.18
1012.94
4.06929 8
3.98584 6
5.03651 1
5.03151 5
5.21116
Interpretation:
The above information shows positive result of the ratio. Which represents that the bank is successful in its investment decisions compared to debt situations. In 2006 the bank gets maximum from interest income. Gradually the ratio falls that indicating the bank is spending greater in loan purpose than collecting deposits. In 2010 the ratio increases than 2009. That means the bank is trying to get income from interest earnings.
2010
2614.3 5
2009
2520.6 9
2008
1937.3 6
2007
1703.5 3
2006
1216.7 9
2005
861.23
Operating Revenue
6643.8 6
5585.3 9
5250.6 3
4194.4
3273.4 1
2451.5 3
0.3934 99
0.4513 01
0.3689 77
0.4061 44
0.3717 19
0.3513 03
39.349 87
45.130 06
36.897 67
40.614 39
37.171 94
35.130 31
Interpretation:
Net Profit Margin of the company was highest in 2009. That means the company was then got highest profit from revenue. In 2010 the amount decreases some extent. But the overall ratio represents a steady form. That represents the companys efficiency in cost controlling. They are efficient in converting the revenue in to profit. This can attract the investors.
2010
6643.86
2009
5585.39
2008
5250.63
2007
4194.4
2006
3273.41
2005
2451.53
Total Asset
81538.3 5
69350.3 3
64583.7 2
55533. 29
41741.9 2
31209.8
Asset Utilization
0.08148 1
0.08053 9
0.0813
0.0755 29
0.07842
0.07855
8.14814 1
8.05387 7
8.12995 9
7.5529 47
7.84202 1
7.85500 1
Interpretation:
Asset Utilization Ratio was highest in 2010 and overall has a steady growth. That represents that the company is using its assets effectively to generate revenue. This means the bank can easily convert its assets in to sales when they in need of liquid money or cash.
2010
81538. 35
2009
69350. 33
2008
64583. 72
2007
55533. 29
2006
41741. 92
2005
31209. 8
Total Equity
8824.6 8
9365.0 4
7921.7 5
6732.7 9
5025.8
4077.1 2
Equity Multiplier
9.2398 08
7.4052 36
8.1527 09
8.2481 84
8.3055 27
7.6548 64
Interpretation:
The Equity Multiplier Ratio of HSBC Bank increases most in 2010. This means the bank is relying more on debt. The percentage of equity in total asset is increasing.
Efficiency Ratio:
1. Operating Efficiency Ratio = Total Operating IncomeTotal Operating Expense
2010
6643.8 6
2009
5585.3 9
2008
5250.6 3
2007
4194.4
2006
3273.4 1
2005
2451.5 3
Operating Expense
1455.5 6
1274.6 8
1144.8 3
867.86
701.62
649.52
Operating Efficiency
4.5644 7
4.3817 98
4.5863 84
4.8330 38
4.6655 03
3.7743 72
Interpretation:
The Operating Efficiency ratio was lower in 2005 but it increases gradually from 2006. In 2010 the ratio is again higher than 2009. This means the bank is expending more in operating. If they decrease the expense in operating they can do more profit. They have to cut cost in the salaries, technology, buildings, supplies and administrative sectors.
Asset Quality:
1. Provision For Loan Loss = Provision for Loan & AdvanceTotal Loan & lease = Specific Provision for Classified Loan & Advances+General Provision for Unclassified Loan & AdvancesTotal Loan & Lease
Items
2010
2009
48.2
2008
228.86
2007
213
2006
47.58
2005
68.49
General Provision for 510.82 Unclassified Loan & Advances Total Loan & Lease
45532. 06
120.54
279.2
213.04
253.76
110.55
30126. 37
31908. 44
32367. 56
24572. 66
19990. 47
0.0159 72
0.0056 01
0.0159 22
0.0131 63
0.0122 63
0.0089 56
1.5971 6
0.5601 07
1.5922 43
1.3162 56
1.2263 22
0.8956 27
Interpretation:
The ratio is lowest in 2009. This means bank was strictly control their loan collection in those days. But in 2010 the ratio increases a large portion suddenly. This indicates the loan collection of that year was very low. This indicates the asset quality is decreasing of the bank.
PART V
Recommendation:
After the analysis of HSBC Banks performance there are some recommendations for the management of the bank to follow for a better profit. At first the bank should invest more in government securities. This will make them sufficient in liquid asset. It can also help when the bank will need immediate cash. The bank should concentrate more in deposit collection. By these they will be able to give loans easily. They have to utilize more their assets for making profit. Their amount of debt is very high. They have to cut it short. Their operating expense is higher. They have to reduce it to make more profit. Their loan collection system is poor. They have to strictly handle it otherwise the bank would be suffered in the long run.
Conclusion:
After completing the performance evaluation of HSBC Bank by ratio analysis, we can say the position of HSBC Bank is strong. But they have to take the above measures so that they would not face any risk in the future.
Appendix:
References
Commercial Banking (3rd Edition) by Benton E. Gup and James W. Koleri Annual Report of 2005-2010 of HSBC Bank Class Lecture Website- www.hsbc.com/bd.