0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
330 просмотров4 страницы
Formative assessment is intended to give students feedback on their learning progress. It is not used to determine whether the student gains credit for the module. Students need to be involved both as assessors of their own learning and as resources.
Исходное описание:
Оригинальное название
Here is How You Can Get a Better Understanding of FORMATIVE Assessments
Formative assessment is intended to give students feedback on their learning progress. It is not used to determine whether the student gains credit for the module. Students need to be involved both as assessors of their own learning and as resources.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Formative assessment is intended to give students feedback on their learning progress. It is not used to determine whether the student gains credit for the module. Students need to be involved both as assessors of their own learning and as resources.
Авторское право:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Доступные форматы
Скачайте в формате DOC, PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
Here is how you can get a better understanding of FORMATIVE
ASSESSMENTS
Formative assessment: Designed to give students feedback on their
progress towards the development of knowledge, understanding, skills and attitudes rather than assessment for marks or grades, which are not given to students.
Formative Assessment: is a form of assessment intended to give
students feedback on their learning progress and to give the teacher an indication of what students have mastered and areas of difficulty. Formative assessment is not used to assign marks or grades toward determining whether the student gains credit for the module.
Formative assessments help monitor the progress of learning and the
acquisition of learning outcomes during instruction; its purpose is to provide continuous feedback to both students and teachers on learning successes and failures.
Another distinction that underpins formative assessment is student
involvement. If students are not involved in the assessment process, formative assessment is not practiced or implemented to its full effectiveness. Students need to be involved both as assessors of their own learning and as resources to other students. There are numerous strategies teachers can implement to engage students. In fact, research shows that the involvement in and ownership of their work increases students' motivation to learn. This does not mean the absence of teacher involvement. To the contrary, teachers are critical in identifying learning goals, setting clear criteria for success, and designing assessment tasks that provide evidence of student learning.
One of the key components of engaging students in the assessment of
their own learning is providing them with descriptive feedback as they learn. In fact, research shows descriptive feedback to be the most significant instructional strategy to move students forward in their learning. Descriptive feedback provides students with an understanding of what they are doing well, links to classroom learning, and gives specific input on how to reach the next step in the learning progression. In other words, descriptive feedback is not a grade, a sticker, or "good job!" A significant body of research indicates that such limited feedback does not lead to improved student learning.
Assessment of Learning and Assessment for Learning
Notes from Chapter 3 of Ahead of the Curve • Page 60, “First, we must assess accurately. I will describe exactly what this means. Second, we must use the assessment process and its results productively: to keep students believing in themselves as capable learners who make sound decisions tat will lead them to greater levels of achievement. • Page 61, The Keys to Assessment Quality 1. Start with a clear purpose for assessment – a sense of why we are assessing. 2. Include a clear achievement target – a vision of what we need to assess 3. Design an assessment that accurately reflects the target and satisfies the purpose 4. Communicate results effectively to the intended users • Page 70, “But what is we supplement it with assessment for learning by asking, ‘How can we use the assessment process to cause students to learn more; that is, to increase achievement in the future?’” • Page 70, “If assessments of learning check to see if our students are meeting standards (state, district, or classroom), assessments for learning ask if our students are making progress toward meeting those standards (day to day in the classroom – during the learning). One is for accountability, while the other is used to support learning.” • Page 71, “Assessments for learning occur while the learning is still happening and throughout the learning process. So early in the learning, students’ scores will not be high. This is not failure – it simply represents where students are not in their ongoing journey to ultimate success.” • Page 71 and 72, The teacher’s role in assessment of learning is as it always has been: to administer accurate assessments and use sound grading practices. But in assessment for learning, this role changes. The teacher’s role in this case is to carry out the following sequence: 1. Become confident, competent master of the standard our students are expected to master 2. Deconstruct each standard into the enabling classroom achievement targets that form the scaffolding leading up to the standard 3. Create a student-friendly version of those targets to share with students from the beginning of the learning 4. Create high-quality classroom assessments that reflect those targets 5. Use those assessments (in collaboration with students) to track improvement over time • Page 72, “The student’s role in assessment of learning is as it always has been: to study hard and strive for the highest scores and grades; that is, demonstrate competence. But in assessment for learning, the student’s role is to strive to understand what success looks like and to use each assessment to try to understand how to do better the next time. In other words, students seek to understand what good writing looks like so they can assess where they are currently and then close the gap between the two.” • Page 73, “The Black and William synthesis instructs us that the keys to maximizing these gains are to increase: 1. The accuracy of classroom assessments 2. Student access to descriptive (versus judgmental) feedback 3. Student involvement in assessment, record-keeping, and communication
Content Then Process:
Teacher Learning Communities in the Service of Formative Assessment Notes from Chapter 9 of Ahead of the Curve
• Page 183 – “Raising student achievement is important, but
not for the reasons many educators think. Forget No Child Left Behind and adequate yearly progress. Forget district and state reports that rank schools by proportion of proficient students. Raising achievement is important because it matters for individuals and society. If you achieve at a higher level, you live longer, are healthier, and earn money.” • Page 184 – “First generation thought that schools made a difference. Second generation found that most of the schools getting good results were in affluent areas, and most of the schools with low student achievement were in areas of poverty. Third generation found that it does not matter very much which school students attend. What matters very much is which classrooms they are in in that school. Students on the most effective classrooms learn at four times the speed of those in the least effective classrooms.” • Page 191, “If students have left the classroom before teachers have made adjustments to their teaching on the basis of what they have learned about students’ achievement, then they are already playing catch-up. If teachers do not make adjustments before students come back the next day, it is probably too late. This is why the most important formative assessments are those that occur minute-by-minute and day- by-day.” • Page 191, “Students and teachers, using evidence of learning, to adapt teaching and learning, to meet immediate learning needs, minute-by-minute and day-by-day” • The Effective Formative Assessments consists of Five Key Strategies 1. Clarifying learning intentions and sharing criteria for success 2. Engineering effective classroom discussions, questions, and learning tasks that elicit evident of learning 3. Providing feedback that moves learners forward 4. Activating students as the owners of their own learning 5. Activating students instructional resources for one another • Page 196, “Teachers learn most of what the know about teaching before they are 18 years old. In the same way that most of us learn what we know about parenting through being parented, teachers have internalized the ‘script’ of school from when they themselves were students.” • Page 199, “Teaching is a highly personal activity, and choice in implementing formative assessment is essential if teachers are to integrate it into their practice.” • Page 200, “The research shows that it is what teachers do in the classroom that really matters – not having teachers meet in workshops to talk about how to assess student work or what students’ scores on test mean for the curriculum.” • Page 200, “So if we are serious about raising student achievement, we must focus on helping teachers change what they do in the classroom.”