SUPERIOR COURT OF WAKE COUNTY

316 Fayetteville St, Raleigh, NC 27602

RodneyDale; Class Private Attorney General P.O. Box 435 HIGH SHOALS, NC [28077] Petitioner Vs CASE #11 CV 00 1559 JUDICIAL REVIEW JUDGE HOWARD E. MANNING JR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Motor Vehicles 3148 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-3148 North Carolina Motor Vehicle License Plate Agency 1471 E Franklin Blvd. Gastonia, NC 28054 Dallas Police Department 131 North Gaston St. Dallas, NC 28034-1625 Administrative Defendants Governor Bev Perdue Office of the Governor 20301 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-0301 Notification of administrative violations PETITION FOR EXECUTION ON JUDGMENT, OR PRAYER FOR A TRIAL BY JURY: NATURE AND CAUSE: COURT HAD 90 DAYS TO RENDER JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AND HAS FAILED TO DO SO

U.S.C. Title 28 Judiciary & judicial procedures & especially section 1652 Act of Congress and Title 5 of the U.S.C. are the Ruling factors to all procedures NOW, COMES, The Petitioner, Rodney-Dale; Class with this PETITION FOR EXECUTION ON JUDGMENT, OR PRAYER FOR A TRIAL BY JURY: NATURE AND CAUSE: COURT HAD 90 DAYS TO RENDER JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AND HAS FAILED TO DO SO. The Petitioner came before Judge Howard E. Manning, Jr, on or about April 21 2011, 12:45 PM on a Motion for Dismissal requested of the NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL. This Motion was denied on the grounds that the Defendants are public officials under the Governor's Office / Executive branch of government. 1. The Attorney General's Office and the Dallas City Law Director Did Not / Could Not rebut or dispute the letter of the law as it is written by the UNITED STATES Congress, or by it's own NORTH CAROLINA State legislation, on the Right to Travel. 2. The Attorney General's Office and the Dallas City Law Director Did Not / Could Not rebut or dispute the letter of the law as it is written, or Court decisions by the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT on the Right to Travel. 3. The Attorney General's Office representing the City of Dallas and the other Defendants Did Not / Could Not dispute or answer the charges in front of Judge Manning, but remained Silent. 4. The Petitioner was then address by Judge Manning for his remedy, and stated the he wished for a Declaratory judgment against the Defendants. 5. Judge Manning, being a judge, was aware of definition and the risk of a Declaratory

judgment. The STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA is in breach of Titles 23 & 49 of the UNITED STATES CODE (USC) and the CODES OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR). The Defendants have forced hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians to Violate Federal and State Statutes in order that they (the Defedants) receive unlawful enrichment, and then withhold Federal funds from the Subdivisions as defined in 23 CFR, section 1250 as laid out in 23 USC, section 402. 6. It appears that after 90 days Judge Manning is not willing to place such a judgment against the Defendants before the court as it (the court) may have a conflict of interest. 7. The Petitioner now demands a trial by jury to resolve this issue and take the decision making out of Judge Manning's hands. The Petitioner was allowed to believe that Judge Manning would be fair and unbiased (as his job description requires), but it now appears that Judge Manning may have either been threatened by the Defendants for doing his duty (job) under Judicial Review of Administrative Misconduct of a public office / officer, or has decided to violate his duty (job) as a judge to help cover up for Defendants unlawful acts, and abuse of the Federal HIGHWAY SAFETY ACT. 8. The Petitioner, because of inaction on the part of the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA or the Dallas City Law Director, has prevailed as the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA nor the Dallas City Law Director could rebut or dispute the Laws on the Right to Travel.

CONCLUSION

The Petitioner has made all efforts to address this issue Administratively. The Petitioner has proven that the Administrative Agencies of NORTH CAROLINA are in

violation of Federal and State statutory Law on the Right to Travel. The Petitioner was told by the Clerk of Court that Judge Manning had up 90 days to deliver a decision. From April 21, 2011 until July 22, 2011 is 93 days. The 4th of July is not just a holiday, but was to be a day of Freedom and Independence from tyranny and a government that oppressed the People and violated the People's Rights. Apparently, things have not changed much from 1776 to 2011. The Court should have enforced the Laws on April 21, 2011 on the Defendants just as it would have if the Petitioner was the defendant and not the Plaintiff. The Court, in that instance, would Not have waited 90 days to pass judgment if it had been the Petitioner being charged. The State would not Not have had to re-address the court on this issue, as the Petitioner is now doing as the Plaintiff / Private Attorney General / prosecutor in this case. The Courts fail to gave equal standing to private Citizen's causes of action, when it's against the State for STATE statutory violations and civil right's violations against the people. This issue is an Administrative Violation and abuse of that public office of Federal and State statutory laws. The Petitioner, again, now demands a trial by jury within the next 10 days in order to get Justice. Judge Manning has not given the Petitioner his judgment to hold the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA accountable. Judge Manning is now required to set this case for Trial By Jury in 10 days of the Court receiving this document having been filed with the Wake County Clerk of Court. Any failure to render judgment as agreed upon on April 21, 2011 against the Defendants or set this for Trial By Jury in 10 days, is just cause for a color of law, and subsequent lawsuit against the Defendants under Title 42 USC, and charges of judicial misconduct to cover up STATE corruption and embezzlement of Federal funds through

the misuse of the HIGHWAY SAFETY ACT.

__________________________ RodneyDale; Class Private Attorney General C/o P.O. Box 435 High Shoals, North Carolina 28077 PROOF OF SERVICE NOW, COMES, The Petitioner Rodney-Dale; Class with this PETITION FOR EXECUTION ON JUDGMENT, OR PRAYER FOR A TRIAL BY JURY: NATURE AND CAUSE: COURT HAD 90 DAYS TO RENDER JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS, and filing with the SUPERIOR COURT OF WAKE COUTRY PER JUDGE MAY'S COURT ORDER on this day of ___________month of ____________in the year of our Lord 2011 AD. The Defendant's copies of this document will be by U.S. MAIL _____________________________ Rodney-Dale; Class Private Attorney General C/o P.O. Box 435 High Shoals, North Carolina [28077]

CC: WILLIAM P. HART JR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DOJ P.O. BOX 629 RALEIGH, N.C. 27602 FOR

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Division of Motor Vehicles 3148 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-3148 North Carolina Motor Vehicle License Plate Agency 1471 E Franklin Blvd, Gastonia, NC 28054 ATTORNEY PENNIE M THROWER 201 W SECOND AVENUE, SUITE F POST OFFICE BOX 279 GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA 28053-0279 FOR Dallas Police Department 131 North Gaston St. Dallas, NC 28034-1625 Governor Bev Perdue Office of the Governor 20301 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-0301