Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD

Furneaux Elementary
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2010-2011 Principal: Jim H. Cunningham
Assistant Principal: Judy Bartlett Mission Statement: Children First at Furneaux Elementary

October 1, 2010

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010 2011

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

CIC MEMBERS
Name Bartlett, Judy Collins, Peggy Cunningham, Jim Davis, Michelle Haltiner, Priss Hulsebus, Dawn Lane, Tara Oorlog, Allyson Turner, Michelle Ware, Derek Genette, Stephanie (Adding additional Parent) (Adding additional Parent) (Adding additional Parent) Position Assistant Principal Teacher Kindergarten Principal Teacher Art Instructional Facilitator Teacher 4th Grade ESL/Math Instructional Facilitator Teacher 3rd Grade Teacher 1st Grade Teacher 2nd Grade Parent, PTA President Parent Parent Parent Years Served 3 3 13 3 5 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 Signature

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

PLANNING PROCESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT

The campus staff elects members to the Campus Improvement Council. Representatives are selected from each grade level, special education, fine arts, and physical education, other electives, and non-teaching professionals. Additionally three staff members are elected at large. These people can come from any grade level or department and are elected by popular vote. Parent and business representatives complete the CIC membership. The primary responsibilities of the Campus Improvement Council members include: Providing leadership in identifying TAKS, fitness assessment, and campus performance goals Providing leadership in the development and implementation of the campus improvement plan Assisting in the development of the campus budget Providing recommendations in the implementation of the campus budget Provide input on campus staff development Assisting in identifying campus staff development needs Chairing a campus committee when the need arises Providing leadership in developing a master calendar for the school year Providing assistance in monitoring and updating campus policies and procedures In establishing campus goals, objectives and strategies for the 2010-2011 campus improvement plan, the following needs assessments were considered: AEIS and AYP reports End of year assessment results including failure rates, Algebra I End-of-course results, special education assessments, and fitness gram assessment Parent survey results (conducted in spring 2010) Information and feedback gathered in parent meetings including PTA board meetings, Parent Advisory Meetings, etc. Information and feedback gathered in CIC Teacher Survey Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campus goals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment to excellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. TS 2. TS 3. TS 4. TS 5. TS 6. TS 7. TS 8. TS 9. TS10. Comprehensive needs assessment School-wide reform strategies Highly qualified teachers Professional development Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools Parental involvement Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments Students difficulties identified on a timely basis Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievement A. TEA Recognized/Exemplary District B. Recognized/Exemplary Schools C. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) D. Achievement Gap E. Special Populations F. TAKS Commended Scores (all students) G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores) H. SAT I. PSAT/NMSQT J. Advanced Placement K. Graduation Data Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff A. Out of School Suspensions B. DAEP Placements C. Attendance Rate Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness A. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST) B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instruction C. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 payments D. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usage E. Overtime hours F. Highly Qualified Teachers G. Teacher Classroom Attendance Rate H. All Staff Attendance Rate I. Teacher Turnover Rate J. Availability of Critical Technology Systems Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system A. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality Together B. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed) C. Staff Survey (to be developed)

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

SMART GOALS (SG)

1. 95% of students in all subgroups will meet or exceed the proficiency standard for passing TAKS Math a. 111.15-3.4B solve and record multiplication problems (up to two digits times one digit) (grade 3). b. 111.15-3.7A generate a table of paired numbers based on a real-life situation such as insects and legs (grade 3). c. 111.16-4.5A round whole numbers to the nearest ten, hundred, or thousand to approximate reasonable results in problem situations (grade 4). d. 111.16-4.14C select or develop an appropriate problem-solving plan or strategy, including drawing a picture, looking for a pattern, systematic guessing and checking, acting it out, making a table, working a simpler problem (grade 4) e. 1111.17-5.1B use place value to read, write, compare, and order decimals through the thousandths place (grade 5). f. 111.17-5.3E model situations using addition and/or subtraction involving fractions with like denominators using concrete objects, pictures, words, and numbers (grade 5). 2. 95% of 5th grade students in all subgroups will meet or exceed the proficiency standard for passing TAKS Science a. 112.7 - 5.6B - Identify the significance of the water, carbon and nitrogen cycles. b. 112.5-3.11D describe the characteristics of the Sun. c. 112.7 - 3.11A identify and describe the importance of earth materials including rocks, soil, water, and gases of the atmosphere in the local area and classify them as renewable, nonrenewable, or inexhaustible resources. d. 112.7 - 5.3A analyze, review, [and critique] scientific explanations, including hypotheses and theories, as to their strengths and weaknesses using scientific evidence and information. 3. 95% of students in all subgroups will meet or exceed the proficiency standard for passing TAKS Reading a. Objective 1 demonstrate a basic understanding of culturally diverse written texts (grades 3 and 5). b. Objective 2 apply knowledge of literary elements to understand culturally diverse written texts. b. Objective 3 - use a variety of strategies to analyze culturally diverse written texts (grade 4). c. Objective 4 - apply critical thinking skills to analyze culturally diverse written texts (grades 3, 4 and 5. 4. 95% of 4th grade students in all subgroups will meet or exceed the proficiency standard for passing TAKS Writing a. Objective 4 recognize correct and effective sentence construction in written text. b. Objective 5 recognize standard usage and appropriate word choice in written text.

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Elementary Math Grades 3-5 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report Percent Items Correct) SMART GOAL
By 2012 95% of students will meet or exceed the proficiency standard on TAKS in Math.

INDICATORS
Objective 1: Demonstrate an understanding of numbers, operations, and quantitative reasoning. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 86 87 80 ED 85 86 81 AA 84 84 68 H 86 85 80 W 88 89 83 SE 83 77 56 LEP 80 80 79 GT 97 98 98

MEASURES
All SEs associated with Objective 1: Grade 3: 3.4B, 3.5A Grade 4: 4.5A Grade 5: 5.1B, 5.3E

TARGETS
Objective 1: Demonstrate an understanding of numbers, operations, and quantitative reasoning. 3rd 2011 Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT 91 92 90 91 93 88 85 100 3rd 2012 96 97 95 96 98 93 90 100 4th 2011 92 91 90 90 95 82 85 100 4th 2012 97 96 95 95 100 87 90 100 5th 2011 85 85 75 85 88 60 85 100 5th 2012 90 90 80 90 93 65 90 100

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring) MAP Tests

Objective 6: Demonstrate an
TAKS Scores 2010 (Actual % Passing)
3rd
Overall

4th 87 87 78 86 90 50 60 100 34

5th 92 92 75 91 96 25 100 100 35

ED AA H W SE LEP GT Commended

94 95 89 89 100 75 87 100 37

understanding of math processes and tools used in problem situations. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 77 75 77 ED 77 71 74 AA 76 62 77 H 74 77 70 W 79 79 82 SE 75 63 50 LEP 71 62 67 GT 100 91 88

All SEs associated with Objective 6: Grade 3: 3.14B, 3.14A Grade 4: 4.14C Grade 5: 5.14B

Objective 6: Demonstrate an understanding of math processes and tools used in problem situations. 3rd 2011 82 82 81 80 85 80 75 100 3rd 2012 87 87 86 85 90 85 80 100 4 2011 80 81 70 82 85 70 70 96
h

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring) MAP Tests

Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT

4 2012 85 86 75 87 90 75 75 100

th

5th 2011 82 80 82 75 87 60 73 95

5 2012 87 85 87 80 92 65 77 100

th

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Elementary Science Grade 5 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report Percent Items Correct) SMART GOAL
By 2012 95% of students will meet or exceed the proficiency standard on TAKS in Science.

INDICATORS
Objective 3: Demonstrate an understanding of the nature of science. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 83 ED 80 AA 78 H 80 W 87 SE 61 LEP 64 GT 94

MEASURES
All SEs associated with Objective 3: Grade 5: 5.8A

TARGETS
Objective 3: Demonstrate an understanding of the nature of science. 3rd 2011 Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT 3rd 2012 4th 2011 4th 2012 5th 2011 88 85 83 85 90 66 70 100 5th 2012 93 90 88 90 95 70 75 100

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

Objective 4: Demonstrate an
understanding of the earth science. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 74 ED 70 AA 62 H 70 W 84 SE 42 LEP 55 GT 80

All SEs associated with Objective 4: Grade 5: 5.6B, 3.11D, 3.11A

Objective 4: Demonstrate an understanding of the

earth science. 3rd 2011 Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT 3rd 2012 4 2011
h

4 2012

th

TAKS Scores 2010 (Actual % Passing)

3rd
Overall

4th

5th 82 76 75 68 96 25 20 100 40

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

ED AA H W SE LEP GT
Commended

5th 2011 80 75 66 75 90 50 60 85

5 2012 85 80 70 80 95 55 65 90

th

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Elementary Reading Grades 3-5 Part 1 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report Percent Items Correct) SMART GOAL
By 2012 95% of students will meet or exceed the proficiency standard on TAKS in Reading.

INDICATORS
Objective 1: Demonstrate a basic understanding of culturally diverse written texts. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 87 81 86 ED 88 79 87 AA 85 72 82 H 83 81 86 W 94 86 86 SE 88 73 59 LEP 78 65 70 GT 100 98 94

MEASURES
All SEs associated with Objective 1: Grade 3: 3.9H, 3.8D Grade 4: none Grade 5: 5.10G, 5.10F

TARGETS
Objective 1: Demonstrate a basic understanding of culturally diverse written texts. 3rd 2011 92 93 90 88 99 93 83 100 3rd 2012 97 98 95 93 100 98 88 100 4 2011 86 84 77 86 91 78 70 100
th

4 2012 91 89 82 91 96 83 75 100

th

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT

5th 2011 91 92 87 91 91 64 75 100

5 2012 96 97 92 96 96 69 80 100

th

Objective 2: Apply knowledge TAKS Scores 2010 (Actual % Passing)

3rd
Overall

4th 92 92 67 96 95 100 80 100 27

5th 93 92 83 88 100 50 60 100 28

ED AA H W SE LEP GT
Commended

97 97 89 96 100 100 93 100 54

of literary elements to understand culturally diverse written texts. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 86 87 83 ED 85 85 82 AA 77 76 71 H 86 88 80 W 87 91 91 SE 86 75 50 LEP 81 72 77 GT 100 100 97

All SEs associated with Objective 2: Grade 3: 3.11J Grade 4: none Grade 5: none

Objective 2: Apply knowledge of literary elements to understand culturally diverse written texts. 3rd 2011 91 90 82 91 92 91 86 100 3rd 2012 96 95 87 96 97 96 91 100 4h 2011 92 90 81 93 96 80 77 100 4th 2012 97 95 86 98 100 85 82 100 5th 2011 88 87 76 85 96 55 82 100 5th 2012 93 92 81 90 100 60 87 100

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Elementary Reading Grades 3-5 Part 2 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report Percent Items Correct) SMART INDICATORS MEASURES TARGETS GOAL
By 2012 95% of students will meet or exceed the proficiency standard on TAKS in Reading.
Objective 3: Use a variety of strategies to analyze culturally diverse written texts. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 84 84 82 ED 87 82 79 AA 83 66 78 H 83 86 80 W 87 91 87 SE 87 71 47 LEP 75 68 57 GT 100 96 84
All SEs associated with Objective 3: Grade 3: none Grade 4: 4.10I, 4.12A, 4.12C Grade 5: none

Objective 3: Use a variety of strategies to analyze culturally diverse written texts. 3rd 2011 88 90 88 88 90 90 80 100 3rd 2012 93 94 93 93 95 93 85 100 4 2011 88 87 70 90 95 75 75 100
th

4 2012 93 92 75 95 98 80 80 100

th

Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT

5th 2011 88 85 84 85 92 55 62 100

5 2012 93 90 88 90 97 60 70 100

th

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

Objective 4: Apply critical

thinking skills to analyze culturally diverse written texts. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 84 81 80 ED 82 79 79 AA 72 60 75 H 83 84 77 W 88 86 86 SE 81 50 52 LEP 76 76 58 GT 96 98 86

All SEs associated with Objective 4: Grade 3: none Grade 4: 4.12B Grade 5: 5.12B

Objective 4: Apply critical thinking skills to analyze culturally diverse written texts. 3rd 2011 88 85 78 88 92 85 80 100 3rd 2012 93 90 83 93 97 88 85 100 4h 2011 85 85 70 88 90 60 80 100 4th 2012 90 90 75 93 95 65 85 100 5th 2011 85 85 80 83 90 55 65 100 5th 2012 90 90 85 87 95 60 70 100

TAKS Scores 2010 (Actual % Passing)

3rd
Overall

4th 92 92 67 96 95 100 80 100

5th 93 92 83 88 100 50 60 100

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT

ED AA H W SE LEP GT

97 97 89 96 100 100 93 100

10

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Elementary Writing Grade 4 (2010 AEIS IT Group Summary Report Percent Items Correct) SMART GOAL
By 2012 95% of students will meet or exceed the proficiency standard on TAKS in Writing.

INDICATORS
Objective 4: Recognize correct and effective sentence construction in written text. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 78 ED 77 AA 73 H 77 W 83 SE 62 LEP 55 GT 97

MEASURES
All SEs associated with Objective 4: Grade 4: 4.18B

TARGETS
Objective 4: Recognize correct and effective sentence construction in written text. 3rd 2011 Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT 3rd 2012 4 2011 83 83 80 83 88 70 60 100
th

4 2012 88 88 85 88 93 75 65 100

th

5th 2011

5 2012

th

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

Objective 5: Recognize
standard usage and appropriate word choice in written text. (%items correct) 3rd 4th 5th Overall 86 ED 85 AA 87 H 82 W 92 SE 87 LEP 62 GT 97

All SEs associated with Objective 6: Grade 4: 4.18C

Objective 5: Recognize standard usage and

appropriate word choice in written text. 3rd 2011 Overall ED AA H W SE LEP GT 3rd 2012 4 2011 90 90 92 88 95 90 70 100
h

TAKS Scores 2010 (Actual % Passing)

3rd
Overall

4th 90 90 89 82 100 100 20 100 27

Unit Tests TAKS RtI(Progress Monitoring)

MAP Tests

5th

ED AA H W SE LEP GT
Commended

4 2012 95 95 97 93 98 95 75 100

th

5th 2011

5 2012

th

11

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Furneaux
Campus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA 2011 GOALS

All Students INDICATOR 2010 Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies All Tests 94% 91% 90% 81% Goal 95% 95% 95% 90%

African American 2010 81% 78% 88% 73% Goal 95% 95% 95% 85%

Hispanic 2010 93% 89% 82% 67% Goal 95% 95% 90% 75% 2010 98% 96%

White Goal 100% 98% 100% 98%

Special Ed 2010 80% 54% * 40% 60% Goal 90% 60%

Economically Disadvantaged 2010 94% 91% 89% 77% Goal 95% 95% 95% 85% 2010 86% 86% 50% 42%

LEP Goal 90% 90% 60% 60%

100% 96%

Participation: Reading/Language Arts Participation: Math Attendance (2008-2009)

100% 100% 97.2%

100% 100% 98%

100% 100% 96.8%

100% 100% 98%

100% 100% 97.4%

100% 100% 98.5%

100% 100% 96.7%

100% 100% 98%

100% 100% 96.8%

100% 100% 98%

100% 100% 97.6%

100% 100% 98.5%

100% 100% 98.0%

100% 100% 99%

12

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Furneaux Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students 2011 Goals
All Students INDICATOR Campus Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 35% 45% 25% 40% State 35% 37% 30% 44% + = Goal 40% 45% 40% 45% Campus 33% 18% 36% State 25% 23% 21% 28% + + + Goal 37% 35% 60% 40% Campus 26% 31% 25% 36% State 28% 31% 25% 36% + = = = Goal 27% 35% 35% 40% Campus 48% 46% 33% 53% State 48% 47% 38% 59% + = Goal 60% 60% 45% 65% African American Hispanic White

Special Ed. INDICATOR Campus 5Reading/English Language Arts Mathematics Writing Science Social Studies 40% 27% State 17% 17% 11% 24% + Goal 45% 30% 25% 27% -

Economically Disadvantaged Campus 33% 31% 18% 34% State 26% 28% 22% 33% + + + + Goal 35% 40% 40% 37% Campus 13% 10% -

LEP State 23% 25% 20% 20% + Goal 25% 30% 25% 25% -

13

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

Furneaux Elementary 2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement
Campus Focus # 1
1. Increase Student Achievement

Criteria for Success

Earn an Exemplary rating by TEA Improve performance by a minimum of 10% on TAKS Reading, Math, Science and Writing 3rd 5th grade. Decrease number of below level readers in each grade by 10% (RTI, tutoring, Fast ForWord). Using 2009 - 2010 as a baseline, increase overall number of fitness tests passed by 3% (2010 - 2011 third grade students will establish their baseline testing). Earn an Exemplary rating by TEA

Performance Measure
B, E B, E B, E B, E B, E

Campus Focus #2
2. All subgroups in grades 3rd, 4th and 5th will increase on TAKS. Smart goals to support this end follow:

Criteria for Success

Math - 95% of all Economically Disadvantaged and Hispanic students will meet minimum expectations on TAKS Math Assessment by 2012 Science - All subgroups will meet a minimum expectation of a 8% increase on the TAKS Science Assessment by 2012 Writing- 98% of all 4th grade students in all subgroups will meet or exceed minimum expectations on TAKS Writing Assessment by 2012 Writing - 40% of all 4th grade students will score Commended Performance on TAKS Writing Assessment this school year through 2012 Reading - 95% of all subgroups (specifically African American and Economically Disadvantaged in 5th grade), will meet minimum expectations on TAKS Reading Assessment by 2012

Performance Measure
B, E B, E B, E

B, E

14

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
Campus Focus #3
3. Provide a safe and peaceful learning environment for all students

Criteria for Success

10% fewer behavioral referrals for 2010 - 2011 than in 2009-2010 100% of all staff members working with students on a BIP will be trained or updated with CPI / Non-Violent Crisis Intervention

Performance Measure
A, E A, E

15

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Campus Focus #4
4. Reduce electrical usage

Criteria for Success

Reduce electrical usage by 8%.

Performance Measure
D

16

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

2010-11 Campus Focus District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Campus Focus #5
5. Improve Parent Involvement

Criteria for Success

95% of all parents respond with a satisfactory approval on the annual 2010 spring survey Achieve 70% enrollment in PTA membership Increase Hispanic parent participation by 10% (using Spanish translators) Conduct parent-teacher conferences with 100% of the parents for all Kindergarten students during the first semester. Conduct 100% parent-teacher conferences for all below level students in 1st 5th grade during the first semester.

Performance Measure
A A C

17

DISTRICT VISION STATEMENT: All students will meet the Texas Assessment of Knowledge & Skills at the proficient or commended level and graduate college-ready without remediation.

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2009-2010

SUMMATIVE MEASURE: All students will: pass their respective grade level TAKS All campuses will: meet or exceed the states number of commended students on TAKS receive a Recognized or Exemplary accountability rating from TEA The district will: receive a Recognized accountability rating from TEA have a minimum of 15 National Merit Semifinalists

CAMPUS GOALS 2 3 4

TARGET AREA

ACTION STRATEGY
1. Provide RTI support for At-Risk students

FORMATIVE MEASURE
At-Risk criteria review SNAP meetings Progress Reports Individual Assess End of Unit Assess th MAP Scores (5 grade) TAKS Scores Prior TAKS results TAKS Release End of Unit Assess th MAP Scores (5 grade) Friday School TAKS Results

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
On-going

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Grade level teachers Priss Haltiner Tara Lane Vimidsa Silva-Montes

COST/RESOURCES
District Funds

TS 2, 5, 9

2. Provide before or after school tutoring for students who failed TAKS or passed by only 3 or less

October through May

Classroom teachers and Support Staff

Stimulus Funds - $5,662 (for tutoring beyond 3:50)

3. Meet with all students who failed TAKS prior year. Contact parents and send home packet. 4. Assess math levels and administer Universal Screening 1 5. Continually identify low performers and assess and monitor their progress to determine reading levels.

September, January & April First 2 weeks of enrollment Every Progress Reporting period, December/January TAKS Release and On-going with all other assessments

Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Tara Lane th 5 Grade Math teacher Jim Cunningham Priss Haltiner Reading Classroom teacher District Math Assessments

US1 Map Testing w/o goals SNAP Meetings Data analysis TPRI/Fountas & Pinnell TAKS Release TAKS th MAP Scores (5 grade)

TAKS Results AWARE Data Reading Assessment Results

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD Campus Plans

Improvement Plan 2010 2011

18

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

1
X

CAMPUS GOALS 2 3 4
X X

TARGET AREA

ACTION STRATEGY
6. Parent contact for excessive absences by letter, phone and home visits Maintain 98% 7. Analyze testing results of Universal Screenings, End of Unit th Assessments, MAP tests (5 grade) and TAKS Release tests to ensure low performing students have necessary interventions & support programs ESL, IS, 8. Teach curriculum the way it is tested, teach it extensively & deeply, teach vocabulary regularly.

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Attendance reports TEAMS data

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
On-going and as needed

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Donna Boettcher Jim Cunningham

COST/RESOURCES
Campus Funds

TS 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 X X

TAKS Results Data Analysis Progress Monitoring th MAP Scores (5 grade)

September May

Classroom teachers Parents Tara Lane Title I Tutors Priss Haltiner Teresa Seeber Classroom teachers Support Staff Teachers (ELL, CM, IF)

Curriculum & Instruction Dept.

TS 2 X X

9. Implement vocabulary strategies and approach across subjects and grades K 5 to enhance voice in written compositions, reading comprehension & background knowledge within various subgroups. 10. Red Ribbon Week activities to promote good choices and Drug Free Life

Lesson Plans Administrative Walkthroughs and Observations Guiding Reading Walkthroughs TAKS Release results Classroom observations Progress reports Benchmark Writing & Reading results Lesson Plans CLT Action Teams

On-going

Campus Funds

September May

Classroom teachers Priss Haltiner Tara Lane Title I Tutors

District/Campus Funds COL Curriculum & Instruction Dept.

Fall Semester Revisit during the year

Cheryl Britton Classroom teachers Jim Cunningham PTA Red Ribbon representative Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Donna Durrant Cheryl Britton Teresa Seeber Classroom teachers

PTA Funds

11. Character Education through FETV, grade level assemblies, R-Time, discipline response and Words of Wisdom. Celebrate and appreciate the diversity of our campus by celebrating differences, while also focusing on what unites us and makes us similar through cultural performances and community sharing.

Parent Survey Discipline Referrals will be cut by 10% Demographic trends Change in our community

On-going

PTA funds Library funds Technology grants R-Time resources

19

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

1
X

CAMPUS GOALS 2 3 4
X X

TARGET AREA

ACTION STRATEGY
12. Solicit increased involvement of local businesses and high school feeder schools (Dan F. Long & Creekview) for mentoring and supporting our high need students 13. Implement Content Literacy Strategies from Modules 3, 4 & 5 on Summarization and monitor CLS strategies are effectively used in classrooms 14. Provide TAKS strategy instruction to LEP students to ensure success on Reading TAKS, all teachers will be ESL certified. 15. Provide instruction in Math and Science vocabulary and comprehension strategies in these content areas to LEP

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Volunteer sign-in Community service log Scheduled business contacts

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
Semester

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Jim Cunningham Cheryl Britton CIC Priss Haltiner Student Leadership Team Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Priss Haltiner Classroom teachers Classroom teachers Priss Haltiner Title I Tutors Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Classroom teachers Tara Lane Title I tutors Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Donna Freis Cheryl Britton Jim Cunningham Jettie Lemon Classroom teachers Title I tutors Tara Lane Jill Speckert

COST/RESOURCES

TS 5

Administrative observations and PDAS evaluations will reflect use of these strategies consistently in classrooms/walk-throughs Prior TAKS results of LEP th population currently in 4 & th 5 grades Friday School Prior TAKS results of LEP th population currently in 4 & th 5 grades Friday School

September May

District resources provided by Curriculum & Instruction Dept.

Each 9-week grading period

ESL Funds Stimulus Funds - $5,662 Title I Funds (materials) $1,363 ESL Funds Stimulus Funds Title I Funds (materials) $1,363

Each 9-week grading period

TS 3, 5, 8

16. Address the needs of G/T students by implementing HLT lessons and activities & through parent involvement and meetings 17. Implement and monitor Math programs: Navigator, Envisions, RiverDeep, UBD, and Calendar Math within grade level classrooms, Investigations, Origo, and Closing the Distance 18. Meet with grade level teams to discuss item analysis reports and student performance.

Progress Reports G/T Report Card Small Group Enrichment

August May

G/T Funds

TS 3, 5, 8

Kilgo charts Observations th MAP Scores (5 grade) TAKS

August May

District Training Pam Smith Best Practices Title I Funds (materials) $1,363

TAKS Release AWARE Data th MAP Scores (5 grade)

September May

Classroom teachers Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Tara Lane

Curriculum & Instruction

20

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

1
X

CAMPUS GOALS 2 3 4
X X

TARGET AREA

ACTION STRATEGY
19. Teachers will organize Parent Conferences for all students, and especially for students scoring low on TAKS Release and Benchmarks, or are reading Below Level 20. Conduct a variety of parent workshops (Cultural, Violence, Bullying, Gang, Dallas Challenge, Fire Safety)

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Benchmark & TAKS Release results Progress reports

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
By end of first semester

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Classroom teachers Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Vi Montes

COST/RESOURCES

End-of-year survey Workshop sign-in for parents trained

Semester

Stephanie Genette (PTA) Cheryl Britton Laurie Murillo Jim Cunningham Vi Montes Stephanie Genette (PTA) Jim Cunningham Michelle Davis Cheryl Britton Dawn Hulsebus Barbara Cook Classroom teachers Jim Cunningham Patti Sloey Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Priss Haltiner Tara Lane Kathy Chapman Friday School Teachers

PTA Funds

21. Increase parent and community participation PTA Board and CIC by holding trainings and student programs on PTA general meeting nights that promote good character and enrichment 22. Encourage parent participation in field trips by supplementing th parental financial responsibility (4 th and 5 grade) 23. Provide assistance and target tutoring for lowest performing students in small groups Reading, Math, Science, during school, Fast ForWord, Friday School and CFBs Summer School program to re-teach and review errors. 24. Provide Intervention for struggling students through Instructional Facilitators, Small Groups and Fast ForWord

PTA Board roster CIC roster Meeting sign-in sheets Current roster of participants R-Time Parent participation

Semester

PTA Funds

September May

TS 6, 10

Title I Funds Stimulus funds

TS 3, 5, 9

TS 3, 5, 9

25. Provide specialized reading instruction for students diagnosed with Dyslexia 26. Implement Science programs: Science Journal Responses, Science Fair, Science lab experiments TS 2, 3, 4, 8, 9

SNAP meeting TPRI/Fountas & Pinnell Progress reports Running Records TAKS th MAP testing (5 grade) Fast ForWord progress monitoring SNAP meeting TPRI/Fountas & Pinnell Universal Screenings Progress reports th MAP Scores (5 grade) Fast ForWord progress monitoring Reading difficulties SST/ SNAP Committee Item Analysis on campus and district TAKS End of Unit Assessment th MAP Scores (5 grade) Progress reports FOSS assessments

September June

Stimulus Funds - $5,662, $3,050 Title I Funds (materials) $1,363 COL

August May

Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Priss Haltiner Tara Lane Kathy Chapman

Stimulus Funds - $3,050 Title I Funds (materials) $1,363

On-going

August May

Priss Haltiner SNAP Team Herman Reading Science grade level teachers Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Monica Johnson

Lindamood Bell Materials Susan Kelly, per assignment from district COL TAKS Guides Science Journal Response FOSS Kits Power Videos Digital Curriculum OLC Campus & District Funds PTA Funds Science Solutions 21

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

CAMPUS GOALS 2 3 4

TARGET AREA

ACTION STRATEGY
27. Focus instruction on Physical Science (light reflect/refract, solutions) and Earth Science (cycles, structures, change and landforms)

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Previous TAKS results th MAP Scores (5 grade) Release TAKS test Teacher observations COL Lesson Plans

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
On-going

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Science grade level teachers

COST/RESOURCES
Canyon Balloon PTA Funds Science Solutions FOSS Kits TAKS Guides Science Journals Campus & District Funds Monica Johnson Special Education Funds

TS 1, 2, 3, 4, 8

28. Administer Universal Screenings (when applicable) and End of Unit assessments so that assessment projections during ARDs will be most accurate. 29. Organize time for teachers and support staff to meet in Vertical and Content Focus teams to review CIP and plan for the success of all

ARDs th MAP testing (5 grade) Universal Screenings End of Unit Assessments TAKS results th MAP testing (5 grade) Campus demographic changes

September May

End of each nine weeks

Stephanie Shiller Teresa Seeber Classroom teachers Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Content teachers PLC CIC Gifted Teachers of Record Donna Fries Jettie Lemom Classroom teachers Priss Haltiner Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Tara Lane

COL Curriculum & Instruction Dept.

30. Staff Development through a campus book study to increase number of hours toward G/T credits
nd th

G/T Awareness Certification plan

2010-2011

C-FB Approved staff development (core)

31. Provide 2 5 grade teachers with focused professional development and supplemental TAKS resources to support instructional efforts in teaching TAKS Reading and Math problem solving strategies to meet needs of low performing students 32. Increase awareness of classroom, playground, hallway, and cafeteria and restroom safety. Staggered lunch/recess Walkie-talkies Cafeteria monitors 33. Action teams will meet each semester to evaluate campus safety needs and develop Campus Crisis Plan; practice emergency procedures at least monthly 34. Require all staff members to wear district photo identification badges

MAP testing (5 grade) TAKS Release results Progress reports Teacher feedback and observations

th

September May

Campus Funds

Nurse and Clinic Aide Campus lunch monitors Head custodian Parent volunteers Red/blue cafeteria cards

6 weeks

Caryn Evenson, R.N. Mercedes Ramirez Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Classroom teachers

Campus Funds District Funds Nurse & Clinic Aide Campus lunch monitors Head custodian

Crisis Team CIC

1 time each Semester

Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Crisis Team Mercedes Ramirez CIC Patti Sloey Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett

Campus Funds Crisis Team CLT CIC Grants District Funds

District Requirement

On-going

22

Campus Improvement Plan 2010 - 2011

CAMPUS GOALS 2 3 4

TARGET AREA

ACTION STRATEGY
35. Identify and respond to the needs of SSI students, closely monitoring their progress on benchmarks and tests.

FORMATIVE MEASURE
Prior years TAKS results Reading Level Math Diagnostic Assessment th MAP testing (5 grade) Fountas & Pinnell assessments Prior years TAKS results Reading Level Math Diagnostic Assessment TAKS results Parent survey Teacher Lesson Plans

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE
On-going SNAP meetings - End of each 9 wks

RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S)
Priss Haltiner Judy Bartlett Tara Lane Jim Cunningham Classroom teachers

COST/RESOURCES

36. Meet with parents of SSI students frequently, send home progress reports 37. Organize a TAKS night for parents 38. Provide classroom subscriptions to enhance learning in nd th the classroom (2 5 grade) 39. Homeroom teachers will incorporate portions of the fitnessgram in daily CATCH 40. Components of CATCH incorporate moderate to vigorous physical exercise into daily structured activities 41. All PE Classes will incorporate fitnessgram into warm up activities 42. All Health Classes will correlate the importance of fitness to students health, nutrition, and improved standardized test scores 43. Implement Test Protocols / Procedures as per district/state mandate

On-going

November January

On-going

TS 2

Priss Haltiner Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Classroom teachers Classroom teachers Jim Cunningham Judy Bartlett Classroom teachers Patti Sloey Homeroom Teachers

Campus Funds

Teacher Lesson Plans and CATCH documentation Physical Education Teachers Lesson Plan

On-going

CATCH Activity Boxes

On-going

Physical Education Teachers

CATCH Activity Boxes Fitnessgram Assessment

Teacher Lesson Plans

On-going

Physical Education Teachers Classroom teachers Physical Education Teachers Caryn Evenson Cafeteria staff Physical Education Teachers

Fitnessgram Guidelines

Teacher Lesson Plans Cafeteria Go, Slow and Whoa items

On-going

Health Textbooks

Fitnessgram Test

Fall 2010

Fitnessgram Assessment

23