Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1996
Copyright 1996 by B arton Davi d Forrester
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My thanks goes to the many people at the DSTO Aeronautical and Maritime Research
Laboratory who have provided scientific, technical and/or moral support during the
course of this research. Particular thanks goes to:
Dr. Bill Schofield for the initial encouragement to start this project and his on-going
interest in its progress.
Brian Rebbechi for his scientific and engineering advice throughout the project.
Ken Vaughan for his invaluable technical input in the design and construction of gear rigs
and the many hours he spent running the rigs, and Christina Dolan, David Parslow, Peter
Stanhope and Madeleine Burchill for their input into the experimental projects.
Dr. Ian Freshwater, of Swinburne University of Technology, for his guidance and advice.
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY
This thesis does not contain any material which has been previously submitted for a
degree or similar award at any University or other institution.
To the best of my
knowledge and belief, no material in this thesis has been previously published or written
by another person, except where due reference is made.
B. David Forrester
February 1996
ii
ABSTRACT
The primary objective of the research reported in this thesis was the improvement of
safety in helicopters by identifying and, where necessary, developing vibration analysis
techniques for the detection and diagnosis of safety critical faults in helicopter
transmission systems.
A review and, where necessary, expansion of past research is made into
a) the mechanisms involved in the production of vibrations in mechanical systems,
b) the failure modes experienced in geared transmission systems,
c) which failure modes are critical to the safety of helicopters,
d) how the safety critical failure modes affect the vibration signature, and
e) the vibration analysis techniques currently used to detect safety critical failures.
The effectiveness of the currently available vibration analysis techniques is investigated
using in-flight vibration data from Royal Australian Navy helicopters and seeded fault
data from a purpose built spur gear test rig.
Detailed analysis of techniques for synchronous signal averaging of gear vibration data is
undertaken, which includes the development of new methods of modelling and
quantifying the effects of synchronous averaging on non-synchronous vibration. A study
of digital resampling techniques is also made, including the development of two new
methods which provide greater accuracy and/or efficiency (in computation) over
previous methods.
A new approach to fault diagnosis is proposed based on time-frequency signal analysis
techniques. It is shown that these methods can provide significant improvement in
diagnostic capabilities over existing vibration analysis techniques.
Some limitations of general time-frequency analysis techniques are identified and a new
technique is developed which overcomes these limitations. It is shown that the new
iii
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................................................... i
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ........................................................ ii
ABSTRACT............................................................................................. iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................... v
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS AND TABLES ....................................... xv
NOTATION........................................................................................... xix
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1
1.1 OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................... 1
1.2 OUTLINE ......................................................................................................... 1
1.3 SIGNIFICANT ORIGINAL RESEARCH ...................................................... 4
1.4 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 5
1.4.1 The need for failure prevention ................................................................ 5
1.4.2 Fault detection, diagnosis and prognosis.................................................. 6
1.4.3 Failure prevention techniques .................................................................. 7
1.4.4 Vibration analysis ..................................................................................... 7
vii
viii
ix
xi
xii
xiii
REFERENCES..................................................................................... 293
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS ................................................................. 303
xiv
xv
Table 6.3 Stewarts Figures of Merit for cracked Wessex input pinion....................... 138
Table 6.4 Narrow Band Kurtosis values for cracked Wessex input pinion .................. 140
Figure 6.6 Demodulated signals at 263.4 hours (103 hours before failure) ................. 141
Figure 6.7 Demodulated signals at 324.3 hours (42 hours before failure) ................... 142
Figure 6.8 Modified demodulated signals at 324.3 hours (42 hours before failure) ..... 144
Figure 6.9 Signal averages at 100% rated power (starboard transducer) .................... 148
Figure 6.10 Signal average spectra at 100% rated power (starboard transducer) ........ 148
Table 6.5 Basic signal metrics for pitted Wessex input pinion (100% load) ................ 149
Table 6.6 Enhanced signal metrics for pitted Wessex input pinion (starboard transducer
@ 100% load) ................................................................................................... 149
Figure 6.11 Demodulated signals at 100% rated power (starboard transducer) .......... 151
Table 6.7 Enhanced signal metrics for pitted Wessex input pinion (5th order spline
interpolation, starboard transducer @ 100% load) ............................................. 153
Table 6.8 Enhanced signal metrics for pitted Wessex input pinion (5th order spline
interpolation, starboard transducer @ 75% load) ............................................... 153
Figure 6.12 Demodulated signals at 292 hours since overhaul (starboard transducer). 154
Figure 6.13 Band limited spectra at 292 hours since overhaul (8-38 orders)............... 155
Figure 6.14 Demodulated signals at 339.5 hours since overhaul (100% load)............. 155
Figure 7.1 Spur Gear Test Rig Schematic.................................................................. 158
Figure 7.2 Spark eroded notch in root of gear tooth .................................................. 159
Figure 7.3 FM4A kurtosis values for test gear G3 ..................................................... 162
Figure 7.4 Pitted gear teeth ....................................................................................... 163
Figure 7.5 Signal averages of test gear G3................................................................. 164
Figure 7.6 Signal average spectra for test gear G3 ..................................................... 164
Figure 7.7 Trended angle domain metrics for test gear G3 ......................................... 166
Figure 7.8 Trend of Figures of Merit values for test gear G3 ................................... 167
Figure 7.9 Narrow band envelope kurtosis values for test gear G3............................. 168
Figure 7.10 Demodulated signal for test gear G3 (102.9 hours) ................................. 169
Figure 7.11 Demodulated signal for test gear G3 (107.9 hours) ................................. 169
Figure 7.12 Demodulated signal for test gear G3 (115.5 hours) ................................. 169
Figure 7.13 Demodulated signal for test gear G3 (123.1 hours) ................................. 169
xvi
xvii
xviii
NOTATION
The following is a list of standard notations used in this thesis.
t
time
frequency
x(t)
s(t)
S(f)
Re[.]
Im[.]
kx
a(t)
(t)
A(f)
(f)
fi(t)
g(f)
bi(t)
ti(f)
xix