Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
December 2001
Figure 1: Prevalence of Delinquency Among Gang and Nongang Youth Ages 13 to 18, SSDP Sample
70 64 54 41 43 51 51
Percentage of Youth
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2 18 22 17 7 9
24
26 14 9 Arrest
Assault Robbery Breaking Felony Binge Marijuana Drug Selling & Entering Theft Drinking Use
Nongang Gang
Note: Youth were interviewed at ages 13 to 16 and 18. In each interview, youth reported activities for the past month (except for drug selling and arrest, which were reported for the past year). For gang members, prevalence reflects only the year(s) of membership.
collected from the participants parents or guardians, teachers, and school, police, and court records. Collection of data on gang membership began when the participants were 13 years old.
Female By Gender Male European American African American By Race/Ethnicity Asian American Other Ethnicity Total Sample
0 5
8.6 21.8
15.3
10 15 20 25 30
Percentage of Youth
Figure 3: Cumulative Percentage of Youth Reporting Ever Joining a Gang, Ages 13 to 16 and 18, SSDP Sample
20
15.3 10.6 12.6
Although low bonding with parents and low religious service attendance were examined as possible predictors of gang membership, neither was found to predict membership.
Percentage of Youth
10
2.4
6.2
0 13
14
15
16
17 (no data)
18
Age
Note: Youth were at risk of joining every year, but the risk rose most sharply at age 15, at the transition to high school.
Huizinga, and Weiher, 1993). Of those who joined a gang, 67 percent belonged for 1 year or less and 33 percent belonged for more than 1 year. In the Rochester Youth Development Study sample, 25 percent joined a gang. Of those who joined a gang, 53 percent belonged for 1 year or less and 47 percent belonged for more than 1 year (Thornberry et al., 1993).
69.4
5 0.8 0 20 40 60 80
Odds Ratio* ns 3.7 3.1 (2.4) 2.0 1.6 2.6 (2.6) 1.8
2.4 3.0 2.3 ns 2.1 1.9 1.7 3.6 3.1 2.0 1.8 1.6
Odds of joining a gang between the ages of 13 and 18 for youth who scored in the worst quartile on each factor at ages 10 to 12 (fifth and sixth grades), compared with all other youth in the sample. For example, the odds ratio for availability of marijuana is 3.6. This means that youth from neighborhoods where marijuana was most available were 3.6 times more likely to join a gang, compared with other youth. Compared with two-parent households. ns = not a significant predictor. These factors also distinguished sustained gang membership (i.e., more than 1 year) from transient membership (1 year or less). For each factor, the number in parentheses indicates the odds of being a sustained gang member (compared with the odds of being a transient member) for youth at risk on that factor.
2.0 (2.3)
Compared with youth who experienced none or only 1 of the 21 risk factors discussed in this study, youth who experienced 7 or more of the risk factors were 13 times more likely to join a gang. Decreasing the number of risk factors in the environments of youth should help to reduce the prevalence of gang membership. Prevention efforts should address all facets of youths lives. As noted earlier, factors that influence youth to join gangs occur in the neighborhood, family, school,
peer group, and individual. Efforts to prevent youth from becoming gang members must address the different aspects of their lives. There is no single solution, no magic bullet that will prevent youth from joining gangs. Although the thought of combating the 21 predictors of gang membership discussed here may seem daunting, anyonea parent, brother, sister, teacher, friend, or member of the communitycan find ways to reduce the chances that a youth will become a gang member. If these efforts are coordinated,
Figure 5: Odds of Joining a Gang at Ages 13 to 18, by Number of Childhood Risk Factors Present at Ages 10 to 12, SSDP Sample Number of Risk Factors
2 to 3 4 to 6 7 or more 0 2 4 6 8 10 3 5 13 12 14
the reduction of risk for gang membership will be even greater. Taken together, the findings reported in this Bulletin suggest some clear guidelines for new strategies to prevent youth from joining gangs. Prevention efforts should start early, focus on youth with multiple risk factors, and take a comprehensive approach that addresses multiple influences.
factors for adolescent gang membership: Results from the Seattle Social Development Project. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 36(3):300322. Howell, J.C. 1998. Youth Gangs: An Overview. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Loeber, R., and Farrington, D.P., eds. 2001. Child Delinquents: Development, Intervention and Service Needs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Spergel, I. 1995. The Youth Gang Problem. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Thornberry, T.P. 1998. Membership in youth gangs and involvement in serious and violent offending. In Serious & Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions, edited by R. Loeber and D.P. Farrington. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 147166. Thornberry, T.P., and Burch, J.H., II. 1997. Gang Members and Delinquent Behavior. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs,
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Thornberry, T.P., Krohn, M.D., Lizotte, A.J., and Chard-Wierschem, D. 1993. The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30(1):5587.
This research was supported by grant number 99JNFX0001 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, grant number 1R01DA09679 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of OJJDP or the U.S. Department of Justice. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, and the Office for Victims of Crime.
References
Battin, S.R., Hill, K.G., Abbott, R.D., Catalano, R.F., and Hawkins, J.D. 1998. The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology 36(1):93115. Bjerregaard, B., and Lizotte, A.J. 1995. Gun ownership and gang membership. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 86(1):3758. Browning, K., Thornberry, T.P., and Porter, P.K. 1999. Highlights of Findings From the Rochester Youth Development Study. Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Ellickson, P.L., Bui, K., Bell, R., and McGuigan, K.A. 1998. Does early drug use increase the risk of dropping out of high school? Journal of Drug Issues 28(2): 357380. Ellickson, P.L., and Morton, S.C. 1999. Identifying adolescents at risk for hard drug use: Racial/ethnic variations. Journal of Adolescent Health 25(6):382395. Esbensen, F.A., and Huizinga, D. 1993. Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology 31(4):565589. Esbensen, F.A., Huizinga, D., and Weiher, A.W. 1993. Gang and non-gang youth: Differences in explanatory variables. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 9:94116. Hill, K.G., Howell, J.C., Hawkins, J.D., and Battin-Pearson, S.R. 1999. Childhood risk
Acknowledgments
This Bulletin was prepared by Karl G. Hill, Ph.D., Project Director, Seattle Social Development Project, Social Development Research Group, University of Washington; Christina Lui, a writer with the Social Development Research Group; and J. David Hawkins, Ph.D., Director of the Social Development Research Group. The results are based in part on work published in Hill et al. (1999) and Battin et al. (1998) and on work in an article by Hill et al. currently under review for publication. The authors would like to thank Robert Abbott and James C. Howell for lending their statistical and substantive expertise.
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Washington, DC 20531 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300
PRESORTED STANDARD POSTAGE & FEES PAID DOJ/OJJDP PERMIT NO. G91
Bulletin
NCJ 190106