SAMPLE / DRAFT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCEDURES (Please Note: All Sample/Draft Personnel Policy language should be reviewed and

approved by a City Attorney prior to adoption.) I. Why do performance evaluation? Employee development Identification of training needs attorney Employee motivation Identification of organizational problems Documentation to support other management decisions including corrective action/ discipline Ensure Job / Position Description is up to date and accurate. II. How to do performance evaluation: Establish the right atmosphere. Find a private place where interruptions and ph one calls are unlikely. Have your calls held. Even the seating arrangements ca n be more important than you think. Two comfortable chairs at a conference tabl e are better than sitting behind the desk with the employee in front of you. Choose the right time. Look at your work schedule as well as the employees. Mi d-morning is often considered an ideal time. Youve completed the start-up routin e but neither of you is too tired to conduct a proper appraisal session. Friday s can be bad days if you are dealing with a marginal performer. There is a week end to brood immediately afterward, instead of a workday when improvements can b e made. Select a time other than lunch. You and the employee will be able to b etter focus on the appraisal rather than the distraction of the meal and the ser ver. Be in the right frame of mind. Dont attempt to conduct an appraisal session if y ou are not feeling well or if the staff person is not well. Both of you need to be prepared mentally for the session. Set the agenda. Have the self-appraisal, planning calendar and appraisals from others in place. Review position description with employee in advance of evaluation with particul ar emphasis on the performance evaluation factors included in the description. Continuous observations during the year with written notation, dating and descri bing important examples of good and poor performance. Evaluate each performance factor independently of all other factors. Plan a :30 minute employee conference to review the evaluation. Schedule the con ference no more than one or two days in advance to minimize pre-meeting apprehen sion. The conference should be friendly but formal. Emphasize good performance and be specific about any unsatisfactory performance. Emphasize that an unsatisfactory rating is your appraisal of job performance, no t of the person. If unsatisfactory performance noted, specify the expected corrective actions and set near term (3 month) follow up. Do this until the performance improves. Brief your supervisor on the strong and weak performance evaluations of those em ployees you supervise. III. Directing the appraisal session: You are conducting this session for one purpose; to discuss the employees perform ance. You should avoid all questions that produce short, simple answers. Try i nstead to ask questions that require extended, thoughtful responses. Which parts of the job do you feel you do well? This open-ended question encour ages the employee to expand and discuss his/her job. Provide me with the details. Please elaborate. IV. Providing feedback: Make the feedback specific. Sometimes employees just dont measure up to the city /towns performance standards. You have to point this out, and it wont be easy. S

ome managers try to avoid this experience. They hope the employees performance w ill improve with time, experience, or just luck. Usually, the result is just th e opposite. Employees conclude that their performance is acceptable and no one tells them anything different until they are fired (worst case scenario). In a case like that, a huge wrongful discharge claim could be filed because appraisal s didnt reflect the actual performance. Performance feedback needs to be constructive in order for it to be productive. It tries to reinforce the positive and change the negative by: Identifying what was done well or poorly. Describing what action or behavior is desired. Explaining the effects of the observed and desired acts or behavior. Constructive feedback focuses on the behavior, not the person. Consider the employees feelings; focus on the action, not the person. Avoid attacking the individual and making judgments. Encourage the employee to listen rather than go on the defensive. Let the employee know what behavior is expected. Explain how you want inadequat e behavior changed. Explain the results or effect of the action or behavior. Take time to point out positive behaviors that can be repeated and work with the employee to come up with ways to repeat those behaviors. Follow up with more feedback and action plans as needed. V. Evaluation errors: "Halo and horns" effect - a general impression colors the rating on all factors. Treat each factor separately. "Recency" effect - the evaluation is based upon the last three or four weeks of performance rather than the totality of the evaluation period. "Central tendency" - fence straddling by the evaluator who is unwilling to assig n appropriate high or low ratings. "Rater bias" - personal prejudice against the employee.

VI. Administration: An employee s signature on the evaluation form does not necessarily imply agreem ent with the evaluation, only that the employee has participated in the evaluati on. Written memoranda documenting performance through out the year should be attache d to the evaluation report. Performance appraisals should be signed by the supervisor. The signed report and the employee s comments and other documents must be filed in the employee s personnel folder and stored in a secure place not readily acce ssible by employees. The personnel file should be made available to the employee upon request but und er controlled circumstances to prevent loss of critical documentation. SAMPLE/DRAFT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM Employee:_________________________________ ________ Supervisor:________________________________ _______ Date: _____________________________________ Time in Position:________________________ Position:_______________________ Department:_____________________

SECTION I - GENERAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Consider each standard separately. Mark an X in the appropriate box which most r eflects the evaluators response. A substandard performance rating on any performa nce standard must be supported by specific comment in the space provided. Use ad ditional sheets if necessary. 1. JOB KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES: The employee demonstrates the know ledge, skills and abilities necessary to perform work satisfactorily. Does not have the basic knowledge, skills and abilities to perform work satisfac torily. Has the basic knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform work satisfactorily. Has exceptional knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform work. COMMENTS:

2. QUALITY OF WORK: The employee demonstrates accuracy, attention to detail an d effectiveness in completion of work. Work is sometimes inaccurate or incomplete; fails to meet departmental standards . Work is usually accurate and thorough; work meets departmental standards. Work is consistently of excellent quality, accuracy, and detail. COMMENTS:

3. PRODUCTIVITY: Employee performs work with efficiency, consistency and timel iness. Works slower than expected; work is of substandard consistency and timeliness. Completes work on time, with consistency and efficiency; meets departmental stan dards. Quickly completes work, often ahead of schedule; effectively prioritizes works; exceeds departmental standards. COMMENTS:

4. RELIABILITY: The employee exhibits dependability and conscientiousness in p erforming work and in willingness to accept responsibilities. Sometimes is not dependable and conscientious in performing work; unwilling to a ccept responsibilities.

Consistently dependable and conscientious; usually accepts responsibilities; mee ts departmental standards. Extremely dependable; follows through promptly on all tasks; accepts responsibil ties; exceeds job goals; show high level of initiative. COMMENTS:

5. COMMUNICATION: The employee demonstrates the appropriate level of written an d verbal communication skills necessary to satisfactorily perform the job. Communication skills impair work performance. Possesses the required communication skills and is effective in the position; me ets departmental standards. Has excellent communication skills; very effective in verbal and written interac tions. COMMENTS:

6. WORK RELATIONSHIPS: The employee possesses the ability to maintain effective and productive working relationships with fellow employees, supervisors and the public. Has trouble getting along with other employees, supervisors, and the public. Has a generally positive approach in assisting others; maintains effective worki ng relationships; meets departmental standards. Exceeds departmental standards; highly cooperative; works hard to promote positi ve work relationships. COMMENTS:

7. SAFETY: The employee adheres to the rules and regulations to ensure safety st andards are met. Fails to follow safety rules and regulations; falls below departmental standards . Follows safety rules and meets departmental standards. Exceeds departmental standards for safety.

COMMENTS:

SAMPLE /DRAFT JOB PERFORMANCE STANDARDS This section is designed to be "job specific". Refer to the "Job Performance Sta ndards" of the employee s position description. Briefly list the major job dutie s specifically related to the performance of this job. Check the standard which represents the employee s work performance. Additional job performance standards may be attached. In the comment section, provide information to explain and sup port ratings that indicate substandard performance. BELOW STANDARD: Job performance generally falls below standards required for the position. MEETS STANDARDS: Job performance satisfactorily meets the requirements for the p osition. EXCEEDS STANDARDS: Job performance consistently exceeds the standards for the po sition. BELOW STANDARD MEETS STANDARD EXCEEDS STANDARD JOB PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 1. COMMENTS:

2. COMMENTS:

3. COMMENTS:

4. COMMENTS:

5. COMMENTS:

SECTION III - OVERALL WORK PERFORMANCE: Check the standard which matches the em ployee s OVERALL work performance. An overall work performance rating which does not meet "Job Requirements" requires specific explanation in the comment sectio n. Explanation must include the specific job performance areas requiring improve ment. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Performance needs improvement to meet Job Requirements. Performance meets Job Requirements Performance exceeds Job Requirements. COMMENTS:

SECTION IV - EMPLOYEE COMMENTS: Comments are encouraged either agreeing, disagre eing or acknowledging the supervisor s evaluation. Attach additional information if needed. Supervisor s signature:___________________________________________ _____________

Employee s signature:____________________________________________ ___________

Chief Administrator s signature:_____________________________________ ______________

NOTE: By signing this form, the employee acknowledges only that this evaluation was discussed and a copy has been received by the employee. The employee s signa ture does not signify agreement with the evaluation. SAMPLE/DRAFT EMPLOYEE SELF EVALUATION EMPLOYEE NAME: ___________________________ DATE:_______________ EVALUATOR: _______________________________ 1. What were your principal accomplishments in your areas of responsibility sin ce your last evaluation? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________

Date:__

Date:____

Date:

2. Within the areas of your responsibility, what are things you could improve or build upon? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ 3. Having reviewed your position description, do your areas of responsibility fi t your position description? If certain areas do not, what adjustments do you f eel should be made? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 4. What aspects of the city/town operations are you most satisfied with? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ 5. What aspects of the city/town operations are you least satisfied with? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ 6. How do you feel about your career development with the city/town? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ 7. Where do you see yourself two years from now? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Once this self evaluation has been reviewed by the employee and evaluator, it sh ould be attached to the employees Performance Appraisal.