Commissioner Delhi Police

Police Head Quarters

Near ITO
New Delhi
30/08/2005

Sub: - FALSE/MISLEADING STATEMENTS BY DELHI POLICE IN STATUS REPORT IN CASE

CRL WP 1551/2004, S.K.KAPOOR VS COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & 9 OTHERS

GIVING AN IMPRESSION THAT DELHI POLICE IS FOR CRIMINALS ALWAYS WITH

CRIMINALS.

I had given complaint against following persons to Paschim Vihar Police Station
and the Economics Offences Wing, Crime Branch: -

1. Shri B.R.Arora, Flat No 265 GH-13, Paschim Vihar New Delhi, OFFICE IOC
building 5th floor sector-1, NOIDA. (2) Shri Anil Thukral, C-219, Lajpat Nagar-1,
NEW DELHI-110024 (3). Managing Director, M/S Sun Glow Capital Services
Ltd 4382/4B 2ND FLOOR, MURARILAL STREET, ANSARI ROAD,
DARYAGANJ-DELHI 110002

ALTHOUGH DELHI HIGH COURT IN NUMBER OF ORDERS REMARKED THAT POLICE HAS
TO REGISTER FIR IF COMPLAINT IS MADE REGARDING ANY CONGZINABLE OFFENCE
WITHOUT ANY RESERVATION REGARDING CORRECTNESS OF COMPLAINT AND POLICE
CANNOT SIT AS JUDGE TO GIVE ANY JUDGMENT. DELHI POLICE CONTINUES TO IGNORE
DIRECTIONS TO HARASS CITIZENS OF DELHI. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI POLICE DOES
NOT TAKE ANY ACTION AGAINST ERRING POLICE OFFICIALS.

Paschim Vihar I/O took view that the case does not fall under his preview so it was sent to
West District Head quarters.

I had sent complaint to EOW, Crime Branch, there investigation were started so I did not
took any serious view of I/O Paschim Vihar sending the case to West District Head
quarters. ALTHOUGH I WAS APPROACHED BY ACCUSED TO SETTLE THE ISSUE AT THEIR
DICTATED TERMS ON PLEA THAT THEY HAVE BRIBED POLICE/NSE/SEBI SO I SHOULD
ACCEPT THEIR TERMS AS NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO THEM.

During investigations Mr. Dhan Vir Dut I/O humiliated me and he was forcing me to sign
the compromise on dictated terms of the accused. I sent complaint to higher ups against
the I/O and met Dy Commissioner EOW regarding misbehavior of Mr. Dhan Vir Dut, after
which the enquiry was transferred to I/O Mr. Romesh Lamba in Dec-2003. EOW-Delhi
Police took view that no case can be made from my complaint and send file to NSE.
ACCUSED SENT FEELERS THAT THEY HAVE SPENT IN LAKHS TO PLEASE
CONCERNED POLICE OFFICERS.

In these circumstances, I was forced to file Criminal Writ Petition in Delhi High Court,
seeking directions to Delhi Police to file FIR or transfer case to CBI. EOW- Delhi In Status
report, EOW Delhi Police has given false/misleading statements, which amount to criminal
offences by concerned Police Officials.

I had highlighted the lapses in investigations in my letter dated 06/04/2004 to your

good self, but no action has been taken.

I am giving below the false/misleading statements made by Delhi Police in Status report: -

At page-2 in Status report, it is stated that complaint gave the details of payments made
from time to time, but at page-8 said “ complainant could not give proof of payments
made” These are two contradicting statements.

It has been shown that Mr. Anil Thukral and Mr. B.R.Arora was not sub-broker of M/S
Sunglow although they were posing as such broker. FOR THIS ALLEGATION
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IS AVAILABLE ON RECORDS. THIS ACT AMOUNTS
MISREPRESENTATION WHICH IS SURELY COVERED IN IPC/ CHEATING.

Concerned police officials have given false information that during investigations I
had given statement that I had requested for transactions in client ID of Mr. Anil
Thukral? Any sensible and honest man will try to understand, when I say that I was
registered with three brokers before coming into contact with accused persons,
WHY I SHOULD HAVE REQUESTED TO TRANSACTIONS IN OTHER PERSONS CLIENT ID?

ACCUSED WERE DEALING WITH DOZENS OF OTHER PERSONS, DID ALL PERSONS
REQUESTED FOR DEALING IN CLIENT ID OF ACCUSED? IF SO, WHY. POLICE HAD TO
INVESTIGATE AND RECORD STATEMENT OF OTHER PERSONS.

In Status report EOW Delhi Police had said that Mr. Anil Thukral was “Client” of M/S
Sunglow without verifying that he was ‘Client” Now it has come to notice that M/s
Sunglow and Mr. Anil Thukral fabricated member-client agreement PLACED AS
EXH-1. THIS IS NEW EVIDENCE AND POLICE HAS TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION
THIS NEW EVIDENCE.

Further M/S sunglow has disclosed recently that Mr. Anil Thukral was also operating
under name of Mr. Mauz Malik and payments were being credited in name of Mr.
Mauz Malik. It means that Mr. Anil Thukral was having two accounts one in name of
Mr. Mauz Malik and another in name of Mr. Anil Thukral, which is an offence and
amounts to be operating under fictitious name. POLICE HAS TO TAKE NOTE AND
REGISTER CASE AGAINST ACCUSED INCLUDING M/S SUNGLOW, SINCE M/S SUNGLOW
KNEW THAT MR. ANIL THUKRAL IS OPERATING UNDER FICTITIOUS NAME AND THEY
ALLOWED HIM TO DO SO, HENCE THEY ARE ACCOMPLICE IN CRIME.

EOW DELHI POLICE INTENTIONALLY TO FAVOUR ACCUSED HAS NOT SEIZED THE
CONTRACT NOTES/ DETAILS OF DEALS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN CARRIED OUT IN
NAME OF MR. ANIL THUKRAL, WHICH POLICE COULD EASILY HAD FROM NSE OR M/S
SUNGLOW AND COULD HAVE INVESTIGATED FOLLOWING: -

I have given hand written statements of Mr. B.R.Arora giving details of deals, in these he
has mentioned the NSE settlement number and name S.K.Kapoor, FROM THESE
STATEMENTS IO HAS NOT VERIFIED THAT (a) HAVE THESE DEALS BEEN
ACTUALLY CARRIED OUT AT ALL (B) IF CARRIED, WERE THESE CARRIED OUT AT
THE PRICES SHOWN IN STATEMENT. IF NOT, THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO CHEATING AND
CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST.

I have given hand written statement of Mr. B.R. Arora showing certain shares with qty
shown as balance in my account, as on 31/03/2003, HAS IO VERIFIED THAT THESE
WERE ACTUALLY BALANCE IN MY ACCOUNT ON DATE SPECIFIED. IF NOT, THIS ACT
AMOUNTS TO CHEATING AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST BY MR. B.R.ARORA & MR.
ANIL THUKRAL. WHERE THESE SHARES HAVE GONE? MERELY TELLING BY THE
ACCUSED THAT COMPLAINANT SUFFERED LOSES IS NO GROUND, ACCUSED SHOULD
BE ASKED TO GIVE STATEMENTS OF DEALS AS REQUIRED UNDER RULES OF NSE/SEBI.

Further it has been admitted by accused that they sold shares of complainant at
their own without consent of the complainant THIS ACT AMOUNTS TO CHEATING
AND CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST. M/S SUNGLOW ALSO CONFIRMED SO.
MY OWN INVESTIGATIONS HAVE SHOWN THAT ALTHOUGH ACCUSED WERE TELLING ME
THAT THEY ARE PURCHASING/SELLING SHARES IN MY ACCOUNT, ACTUALLY THEY WERE
SIMPLY EXTORTING MONEY FROM ME, MR. B.R.ARORA WAS BLACKMAILING ME AS HE
CAME TO KNOW THAT I HAVE TRANSFERRED SOME SHARES WHICH WERE IN MY WIFE’S
ACCOUNT WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE.
All above willful omissions and commissions by Delhi Police amount to criminal
acts under various sections of IPC.

Accused had been threatening that bribe money goes upto top most officials, so
nothing will happen to them, and no action by Top most police officials give
suspicion that accused are correct.

I REQUEST TO PLEASE DIRECT MAKE AN ENQUIRY INTO MY ALLEGATIONS OF

FAVOURISM, IGNORING DIRECTIONS OF LAW BY CONCERNED POLICE AND TAKE
ACTION AS DEEMED FIT & DIRECT THEM TO FILE CASE IN COMPETENT COURT.

S.K.Kapoor
3, Sunshine Apartment
A-3, Paschim Vihar
New Delhi-110063

COPY TO: -
1. HON’BLE PRESIDENT OF Judge of one U.P. court had rightly
remarked, “india police is an orgainised
INDIA
gang of criminals having protection from
2. HON’BLE PRIME MINISTER
govt.” Inspite of number of judgments of
3. HON’BLE HOME MINISTER delhi high court directing to file fir when a
4. HON’BLE FINANCE MINISTER complaint of any cognizable offence is
5. HON’BLE CHAIRMAN made, police continues to harass
NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS complainants by ignoring past judgments
and top police officers do not take any
COMMISSION. action against erring officers. How
6. COMMISSIONER CENTRAL corruption can be removed from country,
VIGILANCE COMMISSION when there is open favourism. Police
7. DIRECTOR CBI. does not investigate properly if not
bribed. Since cheaters who cheat in
millions can easily give lakhs of rupees to
please concerned officers, clear cut
cheating cases are termed as civil case, it
is why india has been ranked as 4th most
corrupt nation in world.