Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 34

National Competitiveness: Issues for Vietnam

Meeting with Prime Minister Phan Van Khai and his delegation

Professor Michael E. Porter Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness Harvard Business School Cambridge, Massachusetts June 24, 2005
This presentation draws on Michael Porter, Klaus Schwab: The Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005, Oxford University Press, 2004 and other sources. For further information on the Report and on the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness see www.isc.hbs.edu

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Topics for Discussion

National competitiveness: essential concepts Competitive assessment of Vietnam Key issues for Vietnamese policy Profile of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

What is Competitiveness?
Competitiveness is determined by the productivity (value per unit of input) with which a nation, region, or cluster uses its human, capital, and natural resources. Productivity sets a nations or regions standard of living (wages, returns on capital, returns on natural resources) Productivity depends both on the value of products and services (e.g. uniqueness, quality) as well as the efficiency with which they are produced. It is not what industries a nation or region competes in that matters for prosperity, but how firms compete in those industries Productivity in a nation or region is a reflection of what both domestic and foreign firms choose to do in that location. The location of ownership is secondary for national prosperity. The productivity of local industries is of fundamental importance to competitiveness, not just that of traded industries Devaluation and revaluation do not make a country more or less competitive

Nations or regions compete in offering the most productive environment for business The public and private sectors should play different but interrelated roles in creating a productive economy
3
Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Determinants of Competitiveness

Macroeconomic, Political, Legal, and Social Context Macroeconomic, Political, Legal, and Social Context

Microeconomic Foundations Microeconomic Foundations


The Sophistication The Sophistication of Company of Company Operations and Operations and Strategy Strategy The Quality of the The Quality of the Microeconomic Microeconomic Business Business Environment Environment

A sound macroeconomic, political, legal, and social context creates the potential for competitiveness, but is not sufficient Only firms can create wealth, not government
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Productivity and the Business Environment


Context for Context for Firm Firm Strategy Strategy and Rivalry and Rivalry
A local context and rules that encourage investment and sustained productivity improvement Demand Demand e.g., Intellectual property Conditions protection Conditions Meritocratic incentive systems across all major institutions Sophisticated and demanding Open and vigorous local local customer(s) competition Local customer needs that anticipate those elsewhere Related and Related and Unusual local demand in Supporting Supporting specialized segments that can be Industries served nationally and globally Industries Access to capable, locally based suppliers and firms in related fields Presence of clusters instead of isolated industries

Factor Factor (Input) (Input) Conditions Conditions


Presence of high quality, specialized inputs available to firms Human resources Capital resources Physical infrastructure Administrative infrastructure (e.g. business registration, rules, licensing, property rights) Information infrastructure Scientific and technological infrastructure Natural resources

Successful economic development is a process of successive economic upgrading, in which the business environment in a nation evolves to support and encourage increasingly sophisticated ways of competing
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Clusters and Competitiveness


Cairns (Australia) Tourism
Public Relations & Public Relations & Market Research Market Research Services Services

Travel agents Travel agents

Tour operators Tour operators

Local retail, Local retail, health care, and health care, and other services other services

Food Food Suppliers Suppliers Restaurants Restaurants Property Property Services Services Hotels Hotels

Attractions and Attractions and Activities Activities


e.g., theme parks, e.g., theme parks, casinos, sports casinos, sports

Local Local Transportation Transportation

Souvenirs, Souvenirs, Duty Free Duty Free Banks, Banks, Foreign Foreign Exchange Exchange

Maintenance Maintenance Services Services

Airlines, Airlines, Cruise Ships Cruise Ships

Government agencies Government agencies


e.g. Australian Tourism Commission, e.g. Australian Tourism Commission, Great Barrier Reef Authority Great Barrier Reef Authority

Educational Institutions Educational Institutions


e.g. James Cook University, e.g. James Cook University, Cairns College of TAFE Cairns College of TAFE

Industry Groups Industry Groups


e.g. Queensland Tourism e.g. Queensland Tourism Industry Council Industry Council

Sources: HBS student team research (2003) - Peter Tynan, Chai McConnell, Alexandra West, Jean Hayden
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Influences on Competitiveness
Multiple Geographic Levels
World Economy

Broad Economic Areas

ASEAN

Groups of Neighboring Nations

Indochina

Nations

Vietnam

States, Provinces

Cities
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Specialization of Regional Economies


Select U.S. Geographic Areas
Denver, CO Denver, CO Leather and Sporting Goods Leather and Sporting Goods Oil and Gas Oil and Gas Aerospace Vehicles and Defense Aerospace Vehicles and Defense Chicago Chicago Communications Equipment Communications Equipment Processed Food Processed Food Heavy Machinery Heavy Machinery Pittsburgh, PA Pittsburgh, PA Construction Materials Construction Materials Metal Manufacturing Metal Manufacturing Education and Knowledge Education and Knowledge Creation Creation

Seattle-BellevueSeattle-BellevueEverett, WA Everett, WA Aerospace Vehicles Aerospace Vehicles and Defense and Defense Fishing and Fishing Fishing and Fishing Products Products Analytical Instruments Analytical Instruments

Wichita, KS Wichita, KS Aerospace Vehicles and Aerospace Vehicles and Defense Defense Heavy Machinery Heavy Machinery Oil and Gas Oil and Gas

Boston Boston Analytical Instruments Analytical Instruments Education and Knowledge Creation Education and Knowledge Creation Communications Equipment Communications Equipment

San FranciscoSan FranciscoOakland-San Jose Oakland-San Jose Bay Area Bay Area Communications Communications Equipment Equipment Agricultural Agricultural Products Products Information Information Technology Technology

Raleigh-Durham, NC Raleigh-Durham, NC Communications Equipment Communications Equipment Information Technology Information Technology Education and Education and Knowledge Creation Knowledge Creation

Los Angeles Area Los Angeles Area Apparel Apparel Building Fixtures, Building Fixtures, Equipment and Equipment and Services Services Entertainment Entertainment

San Diego San Diego Leather and Sporting Goods Leather and Sporting Goods Power Generation Power Generation Education and Knowledge Education and Knowledge Creation Creation

Houston Houston Heavy Construction Services Heavy Construction Services Oil and Gas Oil and Gas Aerospace Vehicles and Defense Aerospace Vehicles and Defense

Atlanta, GA Atlanta, GA Construction Materials Construction Materials Transportation and Logistics Transportation and Logistics Business Services Business Services

Note: Clusters listed are the three highest ranking clusters in terms of share of national employment Source: Cluster Mapping Project, Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Stages Of Competitive Development

Factor-Driven Factor-Driven Economy Economy

InvestmentInvestmentDriven Economy Driven Economy

InnovationInnovationDriven Economy Driven Economy

Input Cost Macro, political, and legal stability Efficient basic infrastructure Lowering the regulatory costs of doing business

Efficiency Local competition Market openness Incentives and rules encouraging productivity Cluster development

Unique Value Advanced skills Advanced infrastructure Incentives and rules


encouraging innovation

Cluster upgrading

Source: Porter, Michael E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan Press, 1990
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Shifting Responsibilities for Economic Development

Old Model Old Model

New Model New Model

Government drives economic Government drives economic development through policy development through policy decisions and incentives decisions and incentives

Economic development is a Economic development is a collaborative process involving collaborative process involving government at multiple levels, government at multiple levels, companies, teaching and companies, teaching and research institutions, and research institutions, and institutions for collaboration institutions for collaboration

Competitiveness must become a bottoms-up process in which citizens take responsibility Every community and cluster can take steps to enhance competitiveness
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

10

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Vietnamese Competitiveness
Accomplishments

Strong GDP growth record; economic growth has been resilient during the Asian Crisis and SARS The poverty rate has fallen from 58% to 29% from 1992 to 2002 Solid labor productivity growth Strong export growth Strong FDI inflows

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

11

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Vietnamese Competitiveness
Issues

Prosperity remains at a low level Labor productivity remains very low Vietnams business environment remains very weak Fall in the GCR business competitiveness ranking in 2004 Key weaknesses include corruption, physical infrastructure, skill base, financial markets, technology, cluster depth and the nature of competitive advantages

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

12

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Comparative Economic Performance


Real GDP Growth Rates
Annual growth rate of real GDP Countries sorted by 19982003 annual real GDP growth rate (CAGR)

20%
CHINA

15%

MYANMAR VIETNAM CAMBODIA LAOS INDIA BANGLADESH MALAYSIA THAILAND PHILIPPINES PAKISTAN HONG KONG NEW ZEALAND SRI LANKA SINGAPORE INDONESIA TAIWAN JAPAN PAPUA NEW GUINEA

10%

5%

0%

-5%

-10%

-15%
97 99 02 20 95 96 93 94 90 91 92 98 00 01 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 03

Source: EIU (2004)


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

13

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Comparative Economic Performance


30,000

Japan
25,000

Singapore

Hong Kong SAR Taiwan

GDP per capita (PPP adjusted) in US-$, 2003

20,000

Slovenia S Korea

15,000

Slovak Republic
10,000

Estonia Latvia Russia

Mexico Malaysia Thailand Laos India

5,000

Philippines Indonesia Bangladesh


0% 1% 2% 3%

Vietnam
Myanmar
5% 6% 7%

China

Cambodia
4%

8%

Compound annual growth rate of real GDP per capita, 1998-2003


Source: EIU (2004)
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

14

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Comparative Labor Productivity Performance


70,000

60,000

Hong Kong SAR Taiwan Singapore Japan

50,000
GDP per employee (PPP adjusted) in US-$, 2003

40,000

S Korea

30,000

20,000

10,000

Malaysia Philippines Indonesia China


0%

Thailand India

Vietnam
Bangladesh
10% 20% 30%

0 -20%
Source: EIU (2004)
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

-10%

Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of real GDP per employee, 1998-2003
15
Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Vietnams Export Performance


World export share in %

World Export Market Shares

0.30%

0.25%

0.20% goods services total

0.15%

0.10%

0.05%

0.00% 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Source: WTO (2005)
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

16

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Comparative Inward Foreign Investment


Selected Countries
FDI Stocks as % of GDP, Average 2001-2003
80%
Asian countries

70%

Netherlands Estonia Malaysia Kazakhstan Hungary Cambodia Czech Republic

60%

Vietnam
50% 40%

China Thailand Poland 20% Philippines Russia Taiwan 10% S Korea India Japan 0%
0% 10% 30%

Costa Rica Slovakia Brazil Slovenia

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

FDI Inflows as % of Gross Fixed Capital Formation, Average 2001-2003


Source: UNCTAD (2004)
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

17

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Global Competitiveness Report 2004


The Relationship Between Business Competitiveness and GDP Per Capita
Norway United States

35,000

Asian countries

30,000
2003 GDP per Capita 25,000 (Purchasing Power Adjusted) Italy

Iceland Canada Ireland Austria Belgium France Taiwan Spain


Greece Cyprus Malta Portugal Czech Rep Hungary Slovak Rep. Poland Slovenia

Denmark Switzerland Netherlands Finland UK Sweden Singapore

20,000

New Zealand Israel S Korea

15,000

Estonia Lithuania South Africa

10,000
Bosnia Paraguay Bolivia

Argentina Croatia Uruguay Chile Bulgaria

Chile Mexico Brazil Turkey Tunisia Jamaica China Jordan Indonesia India

Malaysia

5,000

Vietnam
Malawi

Ethiopia

Ghana Kenya

Business Competitiveness Index


Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2004
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

18

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Factor Factor (Input) (Input) Conditions Conditions

Factor (Input) Conditions


Vietnams Relative Position
Competitive Disadvantages Relative to GDP per Capita
Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Competitive Advantages Relative to GDP per Capita


Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Administrative burden for startups Reliability of police services Availability of scientists and engineers Judicial independence Local equity market access Telephone/fax infrastructure quality Efficiency of legal framework Venture capital availability Quality of public schools Quality of math and science education Railroad infrastructure development

35 36 40 53 54 55 55 57 58 58 61

Quality of management schools Overall infrastructure quality Quality of scientific research institutions Cell phones per 100 people (2003) Extent of bureaucratic red tape Quality of the educational system Port infrastructure quality Quality of electricity supply

91 84 84 84 83 79 77 77

University/industry research collaboration 74

Note: Rank versus 93 countries; overall, Vietnam ranks 73rd in Business Competitiveness and 83rd in 2003 PPP adjusted GDP per capita Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

19

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Factor Factor (Input) (Input) Conditions Conditions


1

Corruption
Asian countries

Rank in Global Corruption Index, 2003

Vietnam
80

-15

-10

-5

10

15

Change in Rank, Global Corruption Report, 2003 versus 2001

Source: Global Corruption Report, 2003


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

20

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Factor Factor (Input) (Input) Conditions Conditions


Per 1,000 inhabitants, 2002

Communication Infrastructure
Vietnams Relative Position

1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Phonelines Cell phones Internet users

Source: Human Development Report (2004)


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Ho ng

Ko ng SA Si R Ko nga po re a, r Re e p. of Ja p M an al ay s Th ia ai la nd C Ph hin ilip a pi In nes do ne s Vi ia et na m In di a Ba Lao s ng la de s M ya h nm ar


21
Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Context for Context for Firm Strategy Firm Strategy and Rivalry and Rivalry

Context for Firm Strategy and Rivalry


Vietnams Relative Position
Competitive Disadvantages Relative to GDP per Capita
Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Competitive Advantages Relative to GDP per Capita


Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Cooperation in labor-employer relations Decentralization of corporate activity Extent of locally based competitors

33 39 40

Hidden trade barrier liberalization Prevalence of mergers and acquisitions Foreign ownership restrictions Effectiveness of anti-trust policy Intellectual property protection Regulation of securities exchanges

91 88 86 84 84 75 69 66

Centralization of economic policy-making 41 Favoritism in decisions of government officials Protection of minority shareholders interests Tariff liberalization Efficacy of corporate boards 50 52 53 61

Business costs of corruption Intensity of local competition

Note: Rank versus 93 countries; overall, Vietnam ranks 73rd in Business Competitiveness and 83rd in 2003 PPP adjusted GDP per capita Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

22

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Context for Context for Firm Strategy Firm Strategy and Rivalry and Rivalry

Taxation
Selected Asian Countries

Positive

Incentive Effect Complexity

Negative
R di a C hi na Ta iw an ea m a s es h or e Ph ili pp in e al ay si Th ai la n SA na gl ad Vi et Ja p
Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

on g

Si ng

Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2004


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

H on

23

Ba n

Ko r

ap

In

an

Context for Context for Firm Strategy Firm Strategy and Rivalry and Rivalry
Stringency of Labor Market Regulation*, (0-100)

Labor Market Regulation


Selected Asian Countries

70 Restrictive 60 50
OECD

40

30

20
Liberal 10

0
Si ng ap or e M al ay H on sia g Ko ng Ja pa n Ko Ind ia re a, R ep C . am bo di a La os Vi et na m In do ne si a Ta iw Ph a ilip n pi ne Th s ai la nd
24
Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Note: Average of values for hiring, firing, and employment condition regulations Source: World Bank (2005)
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

C hi Ba na ng la de sh

Demand Demand Conditions Conditions

Demand Conditions
Vietnams Relative Position

Competitive Advantages Relative to GDP per Capita


Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Competitive Disadvantages Relative to GDP per Capita


Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Government procurement of advanced technology products Sophistication of local buyers' products and processes Buyer sophistication

32 51 60

Stringency of environmental regulations Laws relating to ICT Presence of demanding regulatory standards

89 85 79

Note: Rank versus 93 countries; overall, Vietnam ranks 73rd in Business Competitiveness and 83rd in 2003 PPP adjusted GDP per capita Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

25

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Related and Related and Supporting Supporting Industries Industries

Related and Supporting Industries


Vietnams Relative Position
Competitive Disadvantages Relative to GDP per Capita
Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Competitive Advantages Relative to GDP per Capita


Country Ranking, Arrows indicate a change of 5 or more ranks since 1998

Local availability of process machinery

63

State of cluster development Local availability of specialized research and training services

80 75

Local availability of components and parts 69 Extent of collaboration among clusters Local supplier quantity 68 67

Note: Rank versus 93 countries; overall, Vietnam ranks 73rd in Business Competitiveness and 83rd in 2003 PPP adjusted GDP per capita Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

26

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Vietnams Goods Export Portfolio


Exports by Cluster, 1997-2002
8.00%
Average Change in Vietnams Total World Export Share: +0.100% Footwear

7.00%

6.00%
World Export Share, 2002

5.00%

Fishing and Fishing Products

4.00%

3.00%

2.00%
Apparel

1.00%
Furniture

Vietnams Overall World Export Share: 0.280%

0.00% -0.50% 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% Change in Vietnam's World Export Share, 1997-2002
27

3.00%

3.50%
Exports of = $500 million

4.00%

Source: Prof. Michael E. Porter, International Cluster Competitiveness Project; UN Comtrade.


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Vietnams Goods Export Portfolio


Exports by Cluster, 1997-2002 (continued)
1.00%
Average Change in Vietnams Total World Export Share: +0.100% Leather and Related Products

0.80%

Coal and Briquettes

World Export Share, 2002

Oil and Gas Products

0.60%
Sporting, Recreational and Childrens Goods Building Fixtures and Equipment

Agricultural Products

0.40%

0.20%

Processed Food Information Technology Lighting and Electrical Equipment

Textiles Plastics Motor Driven Products Construction Materials Communications Equipment Power Generation and Equipment

Vietnams Overall World Export Share: 0.280%

0.00% -0.15% -0.10%

-0.05% 0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% Change in Vietnam's World Export Share, 1997-2002
28

0.20%

0.25%
Exports of = $500 million

0.30%

Source: Prof. Michael E. Porter, International Cluster Competitiveness Project; UN Comtrade.


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Leading Vietnam Export Industries, 2002


World Change in Share Export Share 1997-2002 1.17% 1.03% 6.52% 2.28% 7.09% 3.53% 17.04% 8.86% 4.92% 3.39% 19.24% 14.33% 3.99% 0.85% 7.21% 5.63% 8.26% 9.14% 1.36% 0.42% 1.29% 0.63% 2.19% 0.74% 9.99% 9.67% 0.85% 0.23% 5.55% 4.99% 13.32% 10.92% 8.69% 1.43% 1.47% 0.61% 0.64% 0.08% 1.20% 0.33% 1.30% 1.17% 2.27% 1.55% 0.83% 0.73% 0.68% 0.42% 2.74% 1.81% Export Value in $thousands $ 3,076,200 $ 1,236,530 $ 999,876 $ 822,703 $ 406,669 $ 318,736 $ 304,603 $ 299,509 $ 285,029 $ 276,026 $ 272,800 $ 253,093 $ 244,351 $ 238,336 $ 234,641 $ 227,098 $ 214,343 $ 210,394 $ 210,329 $ 178,695 $ 172,631 $ 168,757 $ 168,194 $ 167,583 $ 136,924

Industry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Crude petroleum oils Miscellaneous footwear with leather soles Crustaceans, mollusks, and aquatic invertebrates Other footwear, rubber plastics Coffee, coffee substitute Gym, training shoes and the like rubber or plastics soles Miscellaneous prepared or preserved fish, crustaceans and the like Mens or boys overcoats, outerwear and similar articles Rice, milled or semi-milled Jerseys, pullovers, cardigans, waistcoats, knitted Fish, fresh, chilled, or frozen Other wooden furniture Other travel bags, sets Fruit, nuts excluding oil nuts Womens or girls overcoats, other coats Footwear, with textile uppers and rubber soles Natural rubber, balata and similar natural gums Mens or boys trousers, breeches and shorts Insulted wire, cable and conductors Womens or girls trousers, breeches and shorts Printed circuits Mens or boys shirts Coal, not agglomerated Convertible seats and parts Other garments, not knitted

Cluster Oil and Gas Products Footwear Fishing and Fishing Products Footwear Agricultural Products Footwear Fishing and Fishing Products Apparel Agricultural Products Apparel Fishing and Fishing Products Furniture Leather and Related Products Agricultural Products Apparel Footwear Plastics Apparel Communications Equipment Apparel Information Technology Apparel Coal and Briquettes Building Fixtures and Equipment Apparel

Source: Prof. Michael E. Porter, International Cluster Competitiveness Project; UN Comtrade.


200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

29

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Leading Vietnam Export Industries, 2002 (continued)


World Change in Share Export Share 1997-2002 4.53% 1.90% 4.28% 4.82% 7.12% 2.89% 4.27% 0.39% 2.15% 0.91% 2.34% 1.14% 0.71% 0.33% 1.27% 0.34% 5.04% 8.64% 2.32% 1.20% 2.05% 1.03% 0.10% 0.04% 1.33% 0.00% 0.99% 0.76% 0.39% 0.28% 0.73% 0.90% 1.00% 0.03% 0.29% 0.09% 4.28% 1.50% 0.22% 0.22% 2.64% 1.25% 1.14% 0.64% 2.33% 0.55% 0.91% 0.38% 1.11% 0.13% Export Value in $millions $ 123,943 $ 105,836 $ 98,323 $ 98,077 $ 88,453 $ 82,093 $ 79,772 $ 79,439 $ 76,009 $ 71,320 $ 65,119 $ 61,402 $ 61,047 $ 58,318 $ 55,028 $ 54,577 $ 53,569 $ 53,046 $ 52,140 $ 47,857 $ 45,236 $ 45,019 $ 44,415 $ 43,821 $ 43,615

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

Industry Other sports shoes with leather uppers Spices Ornamental ceramic articles Bicycles and other cycles, non-motorized Brassieres, corsets, braces, suspenders, garters Baskets, brooms, brushes, paint rollers and mops Children's toys Womens or girls suits, dresses, skirts, trousers, knitted Other sports shoes with rubber, plastics uppers and soles Mens or boys shirts, knitted Garments made of felt, miscellaneous nonwoven or coated fabrics Parts for telecommunication equipment Fans, cooker hoods with fan Oxygen-function amino-compounds T-shirts, other vests, knitted Household linens Electric motors<=37.5w Gold, silver jewelry or ware Headgear, knitted or made up from fabrics Vegetables Wood in chips or particles Trunks, suit-cases, executive-case and similar containers Miscellaneous articles of ceramic materials Womens or girls underwear, nightwear, knitted Bedroom furniture of wood

Cluster Footwear Agricultural Products Furniture Sporting, Recreational and Children's Goods Apparel Building Fixtures and Equipment Sporting, Recreational and Children's Goods Apparel Footwear Apparel Apparel Communications Equipment Motor Driven Products Chemical Products Apparel Textiles Motor Driven Products Jewelry, Precious Metals and Collectibles Apparel Agricultural Products Forest Products Leather and Related Products Building Fixtures and Equipment Apparel Furniture

Top 50 Industries as % of Vietnams total goods exports: 82.7%


Source: Prof. Michael E. Porter, International Cluster Competitiveness Project; UN Comtrade.
200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

30

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Key Issues for Vietnamese Competitiveness


Move beyond reliance on low wage-based export growth Make Vietnam a more productive location Upgrade domestic clusters Develop an independent and vibrant domestic private sector Improve privatization process and governance Financial market development Address key weaknesses in the business environment e.g. Corruption and bureaucracy Bottlenecks in physical infrastructure Mobilize emerging clusters Tourism Shoes Textiles Fishing products Oil and gas Leverage different levels of geography Regions within Vietnam Indochina ASEAN

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

31

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness


Intellectual Agenda

Competition and Firm Strategy

Competition and Economic Development

Competition

Competition and Society

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

32

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness


Strategic Pillars

Research and Research and Publications Publications

Competitiveness Competitiveness Information Information

Course Platform Course Platform (MOC) (MOC)

Institution Building Institution Building

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

33

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Potential Resources for Vietnam

Course Microeconomics of Competitiveness Competitiveness data on ISC web site Connection to ISC partners in the region, especially the new Asian Institute for Competitiveness in Singapore

Support for overall competitiveness or specific cluster efforts

200506 GCR Vietnam KC 2005.06.24.ppt

34

Copyright 2005 Professor Michael E. Porter

Вам также может понравиться