November 22, 2005

Dear Editor in Chief,

Then the A.I. continues to comment about end game tactics: Talking of end game tactic or small
things first tactic. Perhaps traditional small things first cash stimuli are: a) ordinary brain –learning
needs b) listening to somebody singing-hearing needs, c) ordinary site seeing-seeing needs d)
ordinary agricultural crops example rice-eating needs; ordinary water- drinking needs e) ordinary
handling example driving a horse -holding needs f) marrying-sex urges or sex needs g) ordinary
walking-walking needs, h) ordinary clothes-body heating needs, i) giving alms, giving tithes-
worshiping needs j) owning anything-owning needs k) collected funds to help a sick person-
emergency needs, l) others-other needs. Small things first made better cash stimuli are: a) from brain
to having formal education-learning needs b) from listening to somebody singing to hearing example:
orchestra, concert, using cell phones-hearing needs, c) ordinary site seeing to touring tourist spot-
seeing needs d) from ordinary agricultural crops to eating pizza-eating needs; from ordinary water to
bottled water-drinking needs e) from driving a horse to driving a car-holding needs; punching
computer keys-finger needs f) from marrying to using Viagra medicine -sex urges or sex needs g)
from ordinary walking to wearing Nike or Addidas shoes-walking needs, h) ordinary clothes to
wearing leather jacket-body heating needs i) from giving coins as tithes to using ATM or smart
money cards to donate alms and giving tithes-worshiping needs j) owning something to owing
corporations-owning needs k) from collected funds to insurance premium-emergency needs l) others;
or ordinary to make better the ordinary and so on…; or keep on improving and reinventing any kind
of priming commodities or economic stimuli- so on…needs!
Some traditional leaders only see very few economic stimuli like the need to have agricultural
crops as the “only” economic stimuli especially rice only; even keep on defending “bias” land
reform. People are mind set to have a trap on the making to stay on having a one hectare farm to be
cultivated and even using intimidation to stick to his mind set; rather think of other cash stimuli
example; needs to drink in bottled water is a billion dollar industries; asking alms and asking tithes
for propagating the universal word is a billion dollar conscientiousness that could cause economic
stimuli or economic cycles. Needs for seeing a movie is a multi billion industry; needs to listening to
good music is a multi billion industries; need to watch foot ball game is a multi billion industries;
needs to send text messages and voice calls is a multi billion industries; needs to have insurance,
pension plan, educational plan are billion dollar industries; needs to enjoy the use of even
controversial thing like Viagra medicine in order to enhance sex for couple is a billion dollar industry;
and many more needs that could stimulate the economy like computers, computer games, raffles,
entertainments, and so on. These industries don’t need much materials or minerals; rather perhaps just
laws and available technologies. Why concentrate on them than insisting on example letting people to
farm on a one hectare farm and be trapped there and be poor forever. Why emancipate him and let
few people manage collective farm lands using automation. If rice could be made very cheap and
have just enough profit let it be so as long as automation did the hard work but never let human do
the hard work; because it is a trap on the making. Concentrate on economic stimulus that doesn’t
need materials and hard labor but could lift the standard of living of people is the key; perhaps law
could help much.
Don’t concentrate on negativism like crocodile syndrome or Ananias syndrome or on corruption
and long tongue syndrome and boastfulness syndrome or class driver syndrome; rather concentrate on
positivism or on those aspects and ideas that change negative to positive and could stimulate cash to
create economic cycle and then another economic cycle. Perhaps if UN could only manage the world
as a whole; or presidents or prime ministers would be as team leaders orchestrating and playing in
tune with one composer or one choreographer or one chief architect created through consensus to see
the whole world as one collective farms so that if example “A” country is suited for producing very
cheap agricultural crops cheap for all let it be so; rather one country would just dump the excess
products to protect self or its high price. If “A” country could supply the agricultural crops for just
having enough profit to all members because of automation let it be so. If “B” country could supply
all the necessary tools or necessary appliances any member needs cheaply or have just enough profit
let it be so; and let countries concentrate on things that being a human is the key for economic stimuli
such as the more a citizen send text message such as “hi!” or “hello” a $ 0.2 dollar cash is
accumulated as economic stimuli; because there is tax being imposed on it as source of economic
cycle; or as “free wind” to turn a wind mill continuously. And if somebody gives $10 dollar tithes or
alms, a ten dollar is accumulated as savings to boost economic flow and perhaps there is tax on it to
create “free wind” or economic stimulus to create economic cycle. If country “A” is a magnet to
gather almost all economic stimulus on agricultural crops so let it be, so that other countries could
concentrate on a) to l) economic stimuli; or lessened its focus on agricultural crops or on d) as
economic stimulus. And if country “A” could siphon almost all economic stimulus of agricultural
crops, international law could be a very powerful tool to create a balancing factor to lessen the
imbalances created.
It is like a clan composed of 3 family members: “x” has 10 hectares planted with rice and has 5
children, “y” has 2 hectares planted with 1 hectare rice and 1 hectare banana and has 1 child, “z” has
1 hectare planted with coconut and has 2 children. So the total collective area is 13 hectares; and they
are planting the old way. If the old way or free for all or no coordinating or team working among “x”,
“y”, “z” is the business tactic or for survival only technique, sometimes “x” has so many surplus and
just dumped the excess; or “x” would just plant 3 hectares of rice for his 5 children and let the 7
hectares be idle; “y” would struggle to plant the 1 hectares for rice and plant the other hectare for
banana just to survive; and “z” same as “y” in some aspects. Or “x”, “y”, “z” or all members of the
clan would talk and all would make a plan. They all agree to loan a robotized tractor so that the 13
hectares land they all collectively owned could be tilled through automation and there would be
surplus for profit; and one member would just supervise all the land for profit and the rest would look
for other business or jobs. But they agree that the profit would be proportionately distributed
according to area and the kind of crop designed and agreed planted. Since land owned by “x” is
agreed for rice only, land owned by “y” is suited or agreed for grapes and not for banana and land
owned by “z” is suited or agreed for converting the conventional coconut product into a “Virgin
Coconut Oil” or a dietary health agricultural crops supplement or Coco Agricultural crops
Supplement. So because all agreed to have a grand design and plan of their property considering
almost all aspects like marketing-supply and demand, technology, automation; so waste, duplicity of
equipment, duplicity of management, duplicity of labor were avoided. Even if “z” has small land but
“x” is humble enough not to plant Coconut trees in his 10 hectares or plant also 1 or 2 or more
hectares of Coconut trees to have more profit but rather agree not to compete to “z” so that “z” could
also use the most of his resources. So their relationship is harmonious and orchestrated to a grand
design to giving each other chances to live prosperous rather than the free for all mentality like crabs
or crocodiles do whose prominence is on its power to bite-wrong interpretation of “might is right”.
They imitate ant’s ways or teamwork’s way. So only “x” with two of his children concentrate
managing on “d” or agricultural crops economic stimuli and the rest of the children were not trapped
on “d” or agricultural crops stimuli rather could see beyond the horizon especially “a” to “l”
economic stimuli. Those waste, duplicity, trap in the making or crab mind setting were counter
balance because of team work, of giving way to less privileged members; because of agreements,
rules and law. The old way of economic justice like dumping excess agricultural crops to the sea so
that high prices would not be affected is an old teaching now. Competition or crab mentality or
crocodile mentality could be lessened by law; rather orchestrating, grand designed, letting one
economic architect do the strategy perhaps on agricultural crops as economic stimuli is perhaps
better; and divert crab mentality not on agricultural crops but on luxuries, status symbols, sports,
lotteries, clothes, entertainment, raffles; or were human simple actions are needed and made dearer,
etc. Economic stimulus “d” or agricultural crops as key stimulus using crab mentality or who is the
fittest, the mighty, the strongest, the powerful get the most is discouraged by law rather ant’s
mentality or ant’s mind set or teamwork mind set is encouraged. Excess lands for agricultural crops
before are now by law converted to land for crops producing oil; or all lands are maximized, utilized
for the betterment of the whole. Agricultural crops like crops for oil mind set is by law under ant’s
mentality or mind set. It is like a strict disciplinarian telling a child that you are grounded if you break
this law. Those member countries having lesser lands are by international law should plant crops
having high price so that member countries owing those small lands could sustained and enjoy life
with the help of international law. Since there are many countries having small lands perhaps through
raffle and through rotation or lobbying for quotas is perhaps better; or rotation of juicy contracts for
high value crops could be allowed. Those large tracks of land should give way. Or by law, countries
with large track of lands should never compete to members having small lands on one high value
agricultural product to prevent over supply. Giving way to poor people having small land to have
more profit is the key to have balanced and harmonious relations among countries; giving way to less
privilege small countries to have high value crops is the key to use agricultural crops as economic
stimulus to elevate the standard of living of third world countries. And let rich countries concentrate
on “a” to “z” with lesser focus on “d” or agricultural crops as economic stimulus. Versus excessive
free for all like crabs or like crocodile do especially on agricultural crops or “d” as economic
stimulus, and plenty of waste and excesses to be dumped or be wasted where hatred, greediness and
selfishness is encouraged.
Perhaps economic stimuli like mined energy or like fossil fuel, mined minerals like iron for ship
building or for building reinforcement, cement for construction building should be under the ant’s
mind set rather than on the crab mind set so that all things that automation is involved should be the
cheaper; and all actions done by human that the automation should not penetrate should be the dearer
or more precious. Principle behind: humans should be given more value than machines; or machine
are invented to lift the standard of living of people; so that people could consume and enjoy more the
cheap products produced or built by automation and to enjoy life more!
Perhaps the specifics could be: pass law that example a crop harvester could be tax through pre-
paid and the accumulated fund would be used to pay pension of 60 years old and above people; or to
pay scholarship for 21 years old down for their education. Perhaps to boost old people or young
people as another economic stimulus; or being an old people or young could become another
economic stimulus; or like an insured person meeting an accident and the accident or natural evil
could stimulate cash to flow especially in health industries. Perhaps placing tax on equipment/s doing
specific automation could let the product become dearer rather than cheaper; or perhaps the principle
where ordinary water is being bottled is now a new stimulus and it could now be the key to have
another economic cycle. Increasing the wages of people without researching and considering other
aspects might lead to closure of business or businesses. Perhaps balanced government should focus
on alternative energy first so that the cost in energy could be lowered and the savings could be added
to salaries so that people could consume more.

From someone who might be dreaming,