March 12, 2006

Dear Editor in Chief,

Then another scholar gave an opinion that discussing controversial
topics might give some clarities and alternative opinions so that not clear
things that create arguments and hatred could have some safe level of
compromise among groups claiming ‘their group is the “only” true and right
group. Then another scholar suggested that by having details and specifics
focusing on key words that could easily fix small problems or doubts
because a small or part of a big problem could contribute some clarity to a
big blur topic insisted that scholars should learn to argue with mild voice.
Then another unintelligent scholar upon pondering that those
controversial topics about religion could move hatred among different
groups if discussed with conceit humbly asked the A.I.: Could the opposite
of the Universal word which is the deceiver uses good words to deceive
others and create misunderstandings, chaos and conflicts rather than love or
even to love ones enemies? Then the A.I. searched, and searched for key
words on group of words…and answered: Perhaps since the beginning of
time, deception is the strategy of the opposite or enemy of the universal
Word. Perhaps sometimes seemingly universal words could deceive the
mind. But seemingly universal word even it has been with the group for
thousand of years should be tested through simple test or simple example.
Perhaps one simple test of simple word is displaying “love your enemy by
giving handshakes and giving smile.” Example: a father was obligated to
display the slogan “love your enemy….” on the wall of his room’s door after
he had heard details about the good teaching. And after sometimes… he
found some good changes from his children who usually hated people with
different faith. And now, the children give sweet smile at people with
different faith who sometimes or usually are passing by their house.
Then another unintelligent scholar asked the A.I.: When did groups of
religion have or had practiced love of enemies? …then the A.I. answered
perhaps with an unintelligent answer…: Perhaps most of the times through
out the centuries each group had or has accused each others as infidels,
pagans, evil doers, of having false religion perhaps because of supremacy of
religion or groups or that their religion was or is the “only” true and right.
Perhaps it is only in the first century that religious groups really had
practiced love of enemies or even became martyrs. Or perhaps those good
faithful with universal word really had loved their enemies or perhaps only
those conceited, self righteous few leaders who wanted to protect their
institutions had instigated others to hate people and even waged wars for self
defense.
Perhaps another test is a simple common sense of uttering the word
Love. Perhaps for group-A, the tactic is repetition. Example saying love,
next time… saying love again, another time… saying love again…again and
again or even every body knows the next out come… or that sometimes
people are used to say it without thinking the essence and when going home
each has his same habit, unmindful of small disorderliness- example: don’t
want to be in good terms with people having different faiths and always
would want to fight and argue and claim that their religion is the only true
and right faith even perhaps fighting to death for the cause or even
detonating himself for the cause instead of dying for the love of his enemies
like Jesus did on crucifixion-he loves those Romans crucifying him by
saying- “forgive them for they don’t know what they are doing”. Perhaps if
the Romans had known that it is wrong to kill an innocent person, the
Romans would not have done the bad action or would not have gone wild or
done things against the dictate of their conscience. But if they knew that it is
bad and still did it deliberately….that’s a different story.
But a soldier is trained to obey orders. If a soldier who is trained to obey
orders and did with full knowledge that it is wrong to kill innocent people or
to set up innocent people for the cause and still did it as planned then
perhaps it is a terrible mistake. Perhaps if a soldier or an intelligence officer
or group knowing that planting evidence is wrong and even playing god is
wrong then still he or the group deliberately do the wrong thing perhaps it is
not a slip of tongue or an accident but premeditated or planned. Perhaps
planned bad action is an example of killing ones own conscience or perhaps
he is saying evil words against good teachings which perhaps is an
unpardonable mistake.
Going back to the topic connected to loving his enemies and discussing
details and some specifics about loving enemies. Perhaps it is clear that
those groups before or even today’s groups are really victims of deceptive
words that had or have pushed them to hate groups they perceived having
false religion. Example two neighboring groups of church goers with
different religion that don’t greet each other or even don’t respect because
each sometimes or most of the times members could hear some sermon
condemning each other beliefs and even uses sarcastic words that respect to
each other is lost. But every time they go to church the word love is being
taught with repetitions. Perhaps deceptive words in their brain are still ruling
their mind when they do hating because each claim that their religion is
superior to the other; or deception words have not been regime changed even
it lasted a thousand years because of their tradition of hating enemies-
especially those that they consider infidels or practicing false religion!
For other groups especially those groups that are base on words, the tactic
is explaining with creativities on saying the word Love. Example saying:
love is giving smile; next time, explaining that love is an ocean of emotion
surrounded by sacrifices or even expenses; then next time, love is self-
emptying; next time, love is giving totally; next time, love is friendships;
next time, love is caring for his enemies or even laying one’s life for the
enemies, etc…! And there is or are concrete results happening like giving
smiles to his enemies because he cares for their well being, and he would
give way if he is doing some unfairness. He has no crocodile syndrome or
any negative syndrome that he should keep with full knowledge. Example if
he/she has been administrating without transparency or keep on using others
pension and did not double the capital even having a period of 10-15 years,
he should now delegate the administration to the one who has never been an
administrator in his/her family who is also qualified; instead… because of
hatred and the word “only”, he/she would give it back to someone who had
already administered the business just to show his/her hatred to someone.
Perhaps hating is caused by the word “only” because the word “only” could
be found on words or claim: ‘I belong to the “only” true and right religion’
especially boosted by words or claims that its management has never done
mistake.
Perhaps words focusing on details and specifics could regime change the
deceptive words in the brain! There are many details, specifics words that
mold the brain or counter attacking the deceptive words in the brain.
Example of deceptive words: one should not love people with different faith
because they are pagans or infidels. Perhaps the best way to evangelize is to
be near with pagans or with perceived false religion. Being close to infidels
or pagans using concrete good examples or by-product of universal word is
more practical than avoiding or hating people with perceived false religion.
But if the other group would want to murder or kill a person because of
religious differences the best thing is to avoid the danger or the last resort is
to have also self defense.
But there is also danger in focusing too much on details and specifics,
because speaker should be really well prepared and well versed on
explaining details and specifics because others might be bored or be misled.
Then the two groups A & B should compromised or make a dialog or
consensus…perhaps from now on: a) those well said sermon or explanations
of universal words using doable, practical, clear ways of good pastors or
good priests or good cleric or good monk would be translated to any native
dialect interested to listen belonging to any group. Perhaps a well delivered
sermon or homily or lecture about universal good teachings with focus on
specifics of either group A,B&C… in its original English version would be
translated as if the recorded video speaker is now speaking of another native
dialect for a particular group example for group D, E, F using example
Chinese, Spanish, Hindu language on wide screen from time to time. And b)
the rituals receiving the “living bread” should also be practiced by any
groups interested or believing that it is really Jesus Christ as Love whether it
is as memory- once sacrifice or as ritual or repetition-as sacrificial Lamb
called transubstantiation. c) Pass a consensus that all good practices of group
A, B & C example using the internet or web site for transparency of
collection of contributions for the week and its breakdowns and the target
goals should be well enforced, so that people could understand clearly the
financial status of the group/s. And the group would do everything to share
and contribute and make financial transparency better to prevent those
people practicing Ananias syndrome to be cleverer in their expertise of doing
that is not fair.
With regards to going back to history, those groups A&B had some
misunderstanding about their beliefs that resulted for a long period of hating
rather than loving ones enemy; and also resulted to what is now the division
of many groups from group-B. Or there are many sub groups derived from
group B already because each would want to have each own group. Perhaps
other groups especially group-D wants to return to their original way of
worshiping. Example worshiping the god of rain for asking blessings like
rain fall called “pagan” way of worshipping or original way of asking
rainfall (but in their mind they might be asking rain from the creator of the
universe; not from the statue made of rock). But perhaps many groups are
now changing for good practicing loving and even loving his enemies or
loving people with different religious beliefs using specifics doable tactic
like handshaking, giving smiling and with eye to eye contact to show his
brotherhood and care.
What will happen if those early Christians were submissive- always
loving his enemies. Would the early Christians survive or would be wiped
out by ethnic cleansing by a superior dominant group? Perhaps being too
submissive is extreme; but perhaps an angel of God would never let that
God’s people to be wiped out because of just loving his enemies.

From a disturb A.I.