Touch Not the Lord’s Anointed

By
Thomas Williamson, Th.M, Ph.D.

The familiar command, "Touch Not the Lord's Anointed," appears in Psalm 105:15. So that we
can see what God is talking about here, let us quote the entire passage, starting with verse 10:

"And confirmed the same unto Jacob for a law, and to Israel for an everlasting covenant,
saying, Unto thee will I give the land of Canaan, the lot of your inheritance; When they
were but a few men in number; yea, very few, and strangers in it. When they went from
one nation to another, and from one kingdom to another people; He suffered no man to do
them wrong; yea, he reproved kings for their sakes; Saying, Touch not mine anointed, and
do my prophets no harm." (Psalm 105:10-15.)

Many preachers and evangelists today teach that if anyone criticizes them, or finds fault with
them in any way, or goes against their wishes, then that miserable sinner has "Touched the
Lord's anointed." Many eloquent sermons, rivaling Dante's Inferno in ferocity, have been
preached to warn those who would dare commit such a sin that they face the unmitigated
wrath of Almighty God. But is this what that verse really talking about?

The immediate context of the verse is a reference to the patriarch Jacob, who was not an
ordained preacher, at least not as we would understand that concept today. Just what kind of
hazard was Jacob in fear of as he wandered from one nation to another people? Did he live in
mortal dread that someone, somewhere, would criticize him? No, his concern was that the
heathen would use physical violence against him. Read his complaint in Genesis 34:30: "And
Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, Ye have troubled me to make me to stink among the
inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites: and I being few in
number, they shall gather themselves against me, and slay me; and I shall be destroyed, I
and my house."

It is clear that to touch the Lord's anointed is to commit an act of physical violence against the
one anointed by God. It does not refer to those who verbally attack and criticize a preacher
and his doctrine. Such verbal attacks may be quite wrong and sinful, and in some cases they
may be commendable and necessary (see Jesus criticizing the Pharisees in Matthew 23, Paul
criticizing Peter in Galatians 2:14-21, Paul versus the Judaizers in Galatians 5:12, Philippians
3:2, etc.) but they are not covered by the idea "Touch not the Lord's anointed."

For further confirmation of this, see I Samuel 24:6-7, where David had an opportunity to have
King Saul killed, but refused to take advantage of it: "And he said unto his men, The Lord
forbid that I should do this thing unto my master, the Lord's anointed, to stretch forth mine
hand against him, seeing he is the anointed of the Lord. So David stayed his servants with
these words, and suffered them not to rise against Saul. But Saul rose up out of the cave,
and went on his way." Immediately afterward, David publicly criticized Saul in front of 3000
of Saul's troops, as well as his own 600 men, saying "The Lord judge between me and thee,
and the Lord avenge me of thee: but mine hand shall not be upon thee. As sayeth the
proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked, but mine hand shall not
be upon thee." (1 Samuel 24:12-13.) No one seemed to feel that David was touching the Lord's
anointed by this open rebuke of Saul. It is clear that to touch the Lord's anointed involved
violence against his person, not criticism, rebuke or public disagreement.
A similar incident took place in 1 Samuel 26: "Then said Abishai to David, God hath delivered
thine enemy into thine hand this day: Now therefore let me smite him, I pray thee, with
the spear even to the earth at once, and I will not smite him the second time. And David
said to Abishai, Destroy him not; for who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord's
anointed, and be guiltless? David said furthermore, As the Lord liveth, the Lord shall smite
him; or his day shall come to die; or he shall descend into battle, and perish. The Lord
forbid that I should stretch forth mine hand against the Lord's anointed." (1 Samuel 26:8-
11.) David was willing to let judgment be executed against King Saul by the hand of another. He
was not talking about the judgment of someone criticizing Saul, or disagreeing with Saul, or
printing an article in opposition to Saul's doctrine, but rather about the violent death of Saul.
That is what it means to touch the Lord's anointed.

In 2 Samuel 1:14-15, David had an Amalekite executed for the sin of stretching forth his hand
to destroy the Lord's anointed. What had the Amalekite done? Had he criticized the doctrine
of a big-name televangelist? Had he exposed the moral failings of a preacher falsely claiming to
be a holy man of God? Had he voiced opposition to some pastor's proposed building program?
No, his offense was of an entirely different nature - by his own testimony, he had taken his
weapon and killed Saul, the man God anointed to be king of Israel. (I believe that Saul was
already dead and that the Amalekite stripped his body and then concocted the story of having
killed Saul in the vain hope of receiving a reward from David.) Regardless of whether or not this
man killed Saul, David believed that he had killed Saul and had him executed for that offense,
not for the offense of verbally criticizing Saul, which was something David himself had done.

Why, then, do we hear so much whining from preachers today who warn their followers, and
their critics, not to touch the Lord's anointed? Just what do these preachers have to hide, and
what are they so anxious to cover up? One would think that it is the unpardonable sin to
criticize or find fault with any preacher in any way. Some of the big televangelists have even
hinted that God will punish their detractors with death.

To rebuke a preacher who has committed errors of false doctrine or practice cannot be the sin
of touching the Lord's anointed, because it does not involve the use or threat of physical
violence. Such rebuke is appropriate and even commanded in certain instances. "But when
Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed."
(Galatians 2:11.) "Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith."
(Titus 1:13.) "Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses.
Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear," (1 Timothy 5:19-20.) The office
of elder here is the same as the scriptural office of bishop or pastor. Presumably it would also
include televangelists and ecumenical evangelists, even though no such creatures are
authorized in the New Testament, and they could not be higher in rank than the Apostle Peter,
who Paul rebuked publicly before the congregation of Antioch.

Who is the Lord's Anointed?

Since we are instructed so many times that we must not touch the Lord's anointed, it might
help to check out the New Testament and find out just who are the Lord's anointed today. In 2
Corinthians 1:21-22 we read; "Now he which stablisheth us with you in Christ, and hath
anointed us, is God; who also hath sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our
hearts." The Apostle John tells us, "But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know
all things.... But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need
not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is
truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him." (1 John 2:20,27.)

There we have it - all Christians are the Lord's anointed. How could it be otherwise? In Old
Testament times, only some believers were priests, but in this age of grace, we are all priests:
"Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up
spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ ... But ye are a chosen generation, a
royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of
him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvelous light." (1 Peter 2:5,9.)

In the light of this glorious truth, that all born-again believers are the Lord's anointed,
perhaps when we are admonished by a preacher to "Touch not the Lord's anointed," we would
do well to answer, "Same to you, buddy!" In fact, the preacher from his place of prominence in
the pulpit can do more harm, to more people, than the average man in the pew, if he is
following unscriptural principles and practices, and therefore he is to be more carefully
scrutinized and watched. Yes, the preacher is the Lord's anointed, if he is truly saved, but so
are you, and so are we. We owe a tremendous amount of courtesy to all of God's true
preachers, including an obligation not to oppose or criticize them in an improper and
unscriptural manner. But they have the same obligation of courtesy to all Christian laymen,
who are also the Lord's anointed.

Some pastors seem to have the idea that because they are ordained to the ministry, they are
on a higher and more exalted level than their followers, but at the same time they are to be
held to a lower level of standard of conduct. Because they are preachers, they say, it is
inevitable that they will offend people, and they are not going to try to avoid giving offenses,
because if they did, they would have to stop preaching.

This is the very opposite of the teaching of the Word of God, which insists that preachers are
to be held to a higher standard of conduct than their people: "Be thou an example of the
believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity." (1 Timothy 4:12.)
"My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater
condemnation. For in many things we offend all." (James 3:1-2.)

The preacher or evangelist who thunders forth with the command "Touch not the Lord's
anointed" intends thereby to silence and shut the mouths of all who might find fault with his
doctrines or methods, no matter how unscriptural they may be, He is a man with much to
hide, a man who cannot bear to have his deeds and his ways openly examined and compared
with what the Word of God teaches.

Such a man is very self-centered, selfish, soulish, and in the final analysis childish. A small
child must have everything his own way, and cannot bear to be challenged, contradicted or
denied anything he demands. He feels that the world should revolve around him, and that all
should cater to his wishes. The dictatorial preacher is no different; his followers must devote
themselves entirely to his service, going around on tiptoes for fear of offending him in any way,
while he feels free to offend all. Little or no time or effort is left with which to serve Christ,
after the followers have served the ego and the cravings of their pastor. He is an insecure,
immature man who lives in dread that somewhere there is someone who dares to differ with
him on some minor issue. Christ has appointed believers to liberty, Galatians 5:1, but the
dictatorial preacher robs his followers of all their liberty.

The moment anyone objects to such immature conduct, or to the fleecing of the tithe money
of God's people, or the lapses in moral standards and doctrinal soundness, the preacher
responds, "Touch not the Lord's anointed!" How silly - no one has threatened to slay them
with a sword, as was done to Saul. It is time for such preachers to grow up. We would all
object, and quite rightly, to any powerful layman who attempted to take control of a local
church and to force all the other members to follow his will without question. For a layman to
lord it over the church is wrong and out of the question. For the pastor to do so is equally
wrong.
This is made quite clear by the words of Jesus in Matthew 20:25-27: "But Jesus called them
unto him (the Apostles) and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise
dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not
be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And
whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant." The same thought appears in
the parallel passages of Mark 10:42-44 and Luke 22:25-26. In 1 Peter 5:2-3 we read, "Feed the
flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof', not by constraint, but
willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind; Neither as being lords over God's
heritage, but being ensamples to the flock."

A New Caste of Untouchables

The effect, if not the purpose, of the new emphasis on the exalted rights of ordained
ministers, is to create a new class of "Untouchables." Unlike the Untouchables of India, who are
at the bottom of society, the new Untouchables are at the top of Christian society, taking
advantage of their sheepish followers at will, clobbering them anytime they want to, while
they themselves cannot be touched. They will reign like kings, living the life of Riley while
their riled subjects have no choice but to bow down and obey.

If all this seems rather extreme, then consider a very incomplete list of some of the offenses
committed by this incipient class of Untouchables here in the United States:

Acts of adultery by famous televangelists and Christian celebrities.

Diversion of tax-exempt funds given for the preaching of the Gospel, to be used instead to
pay off mistresses and paramours.
Prayer requests thrown out in the garbage unread, after donations have been extracted
from the letters.
Converts sent to Roman Catholic churches and other churches which openly deny
evangelical doctrines.
Wild prophetic speculations, including date setting for the Second Coming of Christ,
exposing evangelical religion to ridicule and contempt when the predictions fail to come true.
False claims to receiving direct revelations from God, when the preacher is only quoting
from the notes of the heretical Dake's Study Bible.
Bizarre false teaching, such as that there are nine persons of the Trinity, that Christ was
not God, that all men are gods, that Christ went to Hell and was born again there, etc.
Bullying and intimidation of church members and followers.
Teaching that to be born again is to recover one's lost self-esteem, or that it can be
achieved in a mechanical manner by repeating a few words or coming forward in a meeting,
with no conviction of the Holy Spirit.
High-pressure, unethical fund raising tactics, and waste of funds to purchase ostentatious
luxury items for the preacher.

The New Untouchables would have us to believe that all these sins are permitted for them,
but if any lower-caste Christians dare to criticize them for these offenses, or dare to withdraw
their support from preachers who sin, and advise others to withdraw their support, then we are
told that they have committed the unpardonable sin - they have "Touched the Lord's
Anointed!" What a convenient double standard for the New Untouchables - they can sin
greatly, while those who would never have dreamed of sinning after such a manner are
condemned and made to feel like miserable wretches.

(The lowest circle of Hell has been reserved by the New Untouchables for those who actually
dare to name the names of preachers who have swerved aside from sound doctrine. We are
told that there is "no redemption" for them. In that case, the Apostle Paul must be there,
since he named names, warning against Hymenaeus and Alexander.)

We should not be taken in by the pretensions of the New Untouchables. We have already seen
that all Christians are the Lord's Anointed, that all Christians are priests, and that there is an
equality among all Christians, whether they are ministers or laymen. It is time for us to return
to the primitive and scriptural state of things, in which all Christians are equal, having only one
master, even Christ. "But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all
ye are brethren." (Matthew 23:8.) "Ye ere bought with a price; be not ye the servants of
men." (1 Corinthians 7:23.)

Yes, the Command is For Today

The command, "Touch not the Lord's Anointed" is for today. In 2 Corinthians 11:19-20, Paul
warns against religious leaders who would take advantage of believers: "For ye suffer fools
gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise. For ye suffer, if a man bring you into bondage, if a
man devour you, if a man take of you, if a man exalt himself, if a man smite you on the
face."

Today, among some preachers, it is considered a mark of distinction that they are able to bring
their followers into bondage, devour them, take of them, exalt themselves, and smite or abuse
their followers. They brag about this sort of thing in their preacher's meetings, and conduct
pastor's schools to teach others how to do it and get away with it. But notice what Paul calls
such men - he calls them Fools! In the context, it is clear that he is not talking about laymen
abusing preachers, although that is also wrong. Here he is talking about preachers who abuse
and misuse laymen, and according to Paul, such preachers are fools.

To those who would smite God's people in the face, the command of God is "Touch Not the
Lord's Anointed!"