Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 7

CREW

I
citizens .for.
and ethtcs tn washtngton
October 3, 2011
By Email: EFoia@doc.gov and First-Class Mail
Brenda Dolan
Departmental Freedom of Information Officer
Office of Privacy and Open Government
14th and Constitution Avenue N.W.
U.S. Department of Commerce
Mail Stop H6204
Washington, D.C. 20230
Re: Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Ms. Dolan:
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ("CREW") makes this request for
records, regardless of format, medium, or physical characteristics, and including electronic
records and information, audiotapes, videotapes and photographs, pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. 552, et seq., and U.S. Department of Commerce
("Commerce") regulations, 15 C.F.R 4.1 , et seq.
First, CREW seeks any and all correspondence between Representative Dennis "Denny"
Rehberg (R-MT), his Chief of Staff, Robert Joseph (Jay) Martin, or any other member of his
staff, and any employee of Commerce from January 1, 2008, to the present regarding Mongolia
Forward or Gage LLC/Gage International. CREW further seeks any and all responses by any
employee of Commerce to Representative Rehberg, Mr. Martin, or any other member of
Representative Rehberg's staff, during the same time period regarding these entities. Mongolia
Forward is an American company headquartered in Washington D.C. that is seeking to develop
uranium mines in Mongolia. Gage LLC (AKA Gage International) is a government affairs and
lobbying firm located in Washington D.C. that represents Mongolia Forward, the Embassy of
Mongolia, and several other American and Mongolian interests.
Second, CREW seeks any and all documents and records in any form from any office
within Commerce, from January 1, 2008, to the present, regarding Mongolia Forward. This
request includes, but is not limited to, internal Commerce documents, and any communication to
or from any person or entity outside Commerce including, but not limited to, any member of
Congress, the Embassy of Mongolia, the U.S. Embassy in Mongolia, and any employee or
employees of any other federal agency.
Third, CREW seeks any and all documents and records in any form from any office
within Commerce, from January 1, 2008, to the present, regarding Gage LLC or Gage
International. This request includes, but is not limited to, internal Commerce documents, and
any communication to or from any person or entity outside Commerce including, but not limited
1400 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 450, Washington, D.C. 20005 I 202.408.5565 phone I 202.588.5020 fax I www.citizensforethics.org

Brenda Dolan
October 3, 2011
Page2
to, any member of Congress, the Embassy ofMongolia, the U.S. Embassy in Mongolia, and any
employee or employees of any other federal agency.
Finally, CREW also seeks any and all records of or reflecting communications from
January 1, 2008, to the present to, from, and/or between Commerce officials regarding Mongolia
Forward or Gage LLC/Gage International and any and all of the following:
1) Leo A. Giacometto;
2) A.J. Rehberg;
3) Former Senator Conrad Burns;
4) Any or all individuals identified as officers, directors, or employees of Mongolia
Forward;
5) Any or all individuals identified as officers, directors, or employees of Gage LLC or
Gage International.
Please search for responsive records regardless of format, medium, or physical
characteristics. Where possible, please produce records electronically, in PDF or TIF format on
a CD-ROM. We seek records of any kind, including electronic records, audiotapes, videotapes,
and photographs. Our request includes any letters, emails, facsimiles, telephone messages, voice
mail messages, and transcripts, notes, or minutes of any meetings, telephone conversations, or
discussions. Our request also includes any attachments to these records.
If it is your position that any portion of the requested records is exempt from disclosure,
CREW requests that you provide it with an index of those documents as required under Vaughn
v. Rosen, 484 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 977 (1972). As you are aware, a
Vaughn index must describe each document claimed as exempt with sufficient specificity "to
permit a reasoned judgment as to whether the material is actually exempt under FOIA."
Founding Church ofScientology v. Bell, 603 F.2d 945,949 (D.C. Cir. 1979). Moreover, the
Vaughn index must "describe each document or portion thereof withheld, and for each
withholding it must discuss the consequences of supplying the sought-after information." King
v. US. Dep 't of Justice, 830 F.2d 210,223-24 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (emphasis added). Further, "the
withholding agency must supply 'a relatively detailed justification, specifically identifying the
reasons why a particular exemption is relevant and correlating those claims with the particular
part of a withheld document to which they apply."' !d. at 224 (citing Mead Data Central v. US.
Dep 't of the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242, 251 (D.C. Cir. 1977)).
In the event some portions of the requested records are properly exempt from disclosure,
please disclose any reasonably segregable non-exempt portions of the requested records. See 5
U.S.C. 552(b). If it is your position that a document contains non-exempt segments, but that
those non-exempt segments are so dispersed throughout the document as to make segregation
impossible, please state what portion of the document is non-exempt, and how the material is
dispersed throughout the document. Mead Data Central, 566 F.2d at 261. Claims of
Brenda Dolan
October 3, 2011
Page 3
nonsegregability must be made with the same degree of detail as required for claims of
exemptions in a Vaughn index. If a request is denied in whole, please state specifically that it is
not reasonable to segregate portions of the record for release.
Finally, CREW welcomes the opportunity to discuss with you whether and to what extent
this request can be narrowed or modified to better enable Commerce to process it within the
FOIA's deadlines. Anne Weismann, the CREW attorney handling this matter, can be reached at
(202) 408-5565 or aweismann@citizensforethics.org.
Fee Waiver Request
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii) and Commerce regulations, 15 C.F.R.
4.11(k), CREW requests a waiver of fees associated with processing this request for records.
The subject of this request concerns the operations of the federal government and the disclosures
will likely contribute to a better understanding of relevant government procedures by CREW and
the general public in a significant way. Moreover, the request is primarily and fundamentally for
non-commercial purposes. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii). See, e.g., McClellan Ecological v.
Carlucci, 835 F .2d 1282, 1285 (9th Cir. 1987).
Specifically, these records are likely to contribute to greater public awareness about
Commerce's role in supporting Mongolia Forward's efforts to develop uranium mines in
Mongolia. In recent years, Commerce has aided American companies in their efforts to import
uranium mined abroad. See Tom Doggett, US Nuclear Power Plants to Get More Russia
Uranium, Reuters, February 2, 2008 (attached as Exhibit 1). CREW seeks to determine whether
Commerce, possibly at the behest of members of Congress, also promoted Mongolia Forward's
efforts to develop mines in Mongolia.
CREW is a non-profit corporation, organized under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code. CREW is committed to protecting the public's right to be aware ofthe activities
of government officials and to ensuring the integrity of those officials. CREW uses a
combination of research, litigation, and advocacy to advance its mission. The release of
information garnered through this request is not in CREW's financial interest. CREW will
analyze the information responsive to this request, and will share its analysis with the public,
either through memoranda, reports, or press releases. In addition, CREW will disseminate any
documents it acquires from this request to the public through its website,
www.citizensforethics.org, which also includes links to thousands of pages of documents CREW
acquired through its multiple FOIA requests as well as documents related to CREW's litigation
and agency complaints, and through www.scribd.com.
Under these circumstances, CREW satisfies fully the criteria for a fee waiver.
Brenda Dolan
October 3, 2011
Page4
News Media Fee Waiver Request
CREW also asks that it not be charged search or review fees for this request because
CREW qualifies as a "representative of the news media" pursuant to the FOIA and Commerce
regulations 4.11. In Nat 'l Sec. Archive v. US. Dep 't of Defense, 880 F.2d 1381, 1386 (D.C.
Cir. 1989), the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found the National Security
Archive was a representative of the news media under the FOIA, relying on the FOIA's
legislative history, which indicates the phrase "representative of the news media" is to be
interpreted broadly; "it is critical that the phrase 'representative of the news media' be broadly
interpreted if the act is to work as expected. . .. In fact, any person or organization which
regularly publishes or disseminates information to the public ... should qualify for waivers as a
'representative of the news media."' 132 Cong. Rec. S 14298 (daily ed. Sept. 30, 1986) (emphasis
added), cited in id
CREW routinely and systematically disseminates information to the public in several
ways. First, CREW maintains a frequently visited website, www.citizensforethics.org, that
received 41,446 page views in September 2011. In addition, CREW posts all of the documents it
receives under the FOIA on www.scribd.com, and that site has received 1,300,981 page views of
CREW's documents since April14, 2010.
Second, since May 2007 CREW has published an online newsletter, CREWCuts, that
currently has 16,281 subscribers. CREWCuts provides subscribers with regular updates
regarding CREW's activities and information the organization has received from government
entities. A complete archive of past CREWCuts is available at
http:/ /www.citizensforethics.org/newsletter.
Third, CREW publishes a blog, Citizens bloggingfor responsibility and ethics in
Washington, that reports on and analyzes newsworthy developments regarding government
ethics and corruption. The blog, located at http://www.citizensforethics.org/blog, also provides
links that direct readers to other news articles and commentary on these issues. CREW's blog
had 3,857 page views in September 2011.
Finally, CREW has published numerous reports to educate the public about government
ethics and corruption. See The Revolving Door, a comprehensive look into the post-government
activities of24 former members of President Bush's cabinet; Record Chaos, which examines
agency compliance with electronic record keeping responsibilities; and Those Who Dared: 30
Officials Who Stood Up For Our Country. These and all other CREW's reports are available at
http://www.citizensforethics.org/reports.
Based on these extensive publication activities, CREW qualifies for a fee waiver as a
"representative of the news media" under the FOIA and agency regulations.
Brenda Dolan
October 3, 2011
Page 5
Conclusion
If you have any questions about this request or foresee any problems in releasing fully the
requested records on an expedited basis, please contact me at (202) 408-5565. Also, if CREW's
request for a fee waiver is not granted in full, please contact our office immediately upon making
such determination. Please send the requested records to Anne L. Weismann, Citizens for
Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, 1400 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 450, Washington, D.C.
20005.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Anne L. Weismann
Chief Counsel
EXHIBIT 1
Print
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.
US nuclear power plants to get more Russia
uranium
Sat, Feb 2 2008
ByTom Doggett
WASHINGTON, Feb 1 (Reuters)- U.S. nuclear power reactors will be able to obtain more supplies of Russian enriched
uranium for fuel, under a trade deal signed by the two countries late on Friday.
The agreement will provide U.S. utilities with a reliable supply of nuclear fuel by allowing Russia to boost exports export to
the United States while minimizing any disruption to the United States' domestic enrichment industry.
'The agreement will encourage bilateral trade in Russian uranium products for peaceful purposes," said U.S. Commerce
Secretary Carlos Gutierrez. "It will also help to ensure that U.S. utilities have an adequate source of enriched uranium for
U.S. utility consumers.
Gutierrez and Russian Federal Atomic Energy Director Sergey Kiriyenko signed the deal allowing for sales of
Russian enriched uranium directly to U.S. utilities. Before the agreement, such direct transactions were not permitted.
For years, the U.S. government has restricted Russian uranium shipments, fearing Russia would dump uranium in the U.S.
market and financially hurt the major American uranium supplier, USEC Inc (USU.N: Quote, Profile, Research).
A spokesman for the Russia's Atomic Energy with the new trade deal "the volumes of direct deliveries of
uranium enrichment services may total 20 percent of the market, so one in every five atomic stations in the U.S. will work
thanks to the import of Russian uranium enrichment services."
Under the deal, Russian uranium exports to the United States would increase slowly over a 1 0-year period, beginning in
2011, when shipments would be allowed to reach 16,559 tons.
Exports would then increase about 50 percent annually over the next two years and increase more than tenfold from 41,398
tons in 2013, when the current "fv1egatons to fv1egawatts" program expires, to 485,279 tons the next year.
Shipments would increase at much slower rates in each of the following six years, until reaching 514,754 tons in 2020.
Under the "fv1egatons to fv1egawatts" program, enriched uranium from dismantled Russian nuclear weapons is imported by
USEC and processed into fuel to run American nuclear power reactors.
USEC has said it does not object to the deal as long as Russian uranium does not jeopardize existing company facilities
and the various new projects underway.
Owners of U.S. nuclear power reactors bought 67 mill ion pounds of uranium in 2006. About 16 percent came from the
United States and the rest, 56 million pounds, came from foreign suppliers, according to the Energy Department (Editing by
Doina Chiacu)
Thomson Reuters 2011. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their
own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by
framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters
and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world.
Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of
relevant interests.
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.

Вам также может понравиться