Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2
Editors-in-Chief Sam Knowles Amelia Stanton Managing Editor of Features Charles Pletcher Managing Editor of Arts & Culture Jennie Young Carr Managing Editor of Lifestyle Jane Brendlinger Features Editors Zo Hoffman Emily Spinner Arts & Culture Editors Clayton Aldern Tyler Bourgoise Lifestyle Editors Jen Harlan Alexa Trearchis Pencil Pusher Phil Lai Chief Layout Editor Clara Beyer Aesthetic Mastermind Lucas Huh Contributing Editors Emeriti Marshall Katheder Sam Carter Matt Klebanoff Copy Chiefs Julia Kantor Justine Palefsky Staff Wrter Berit Goetz Copy Editors Lucas Huh Kristina Petersen Allison Shafir Blake Cecil Nora Trice Chris Anderson
CONTENTS
material living // ethan bealbrown
3 upfront 4 feature
GOT PROBLEMS?
formspring.me/lovecraftdorian formspring.me/emilypostmag
jumping the shark? // sam carter oxymorons and obscenities // james stomber who is this guy? // kate doyle
WANT TO WRITE?
email post.magazine@gmail.com and tell us why youre awesome. if you want to hang out with cool people, we want to hang out with you. yours truly, post-
the taste of fall // jane brendlinger the writing on the wall // marshall katheder sexy sadie // sadie emily post dorian
weekend
Post- Magazine is published every Thursday in the Brown Daily Herald. It covers books, theater, music, film, food, art, and University culture around College Hill. Post- editors can be contacted at post.magazine@gmail. com. Letters are always welcome, and can be either e-mailed or sent to Post- Magazine, 195 Angell Street, Providence, RI 02906. We claim the right to edit letters for style, clarity, and length.
five
1
upfront
1 2 3 4 5
Thought he was in India. Like, he was pretty f*cking sure. Disease-ridden dude brought wack syphilis back to Europe. First Italian in America; guidos inevitable. Discovered inhabited land. Sails made of hemp. But didnt burn the Devils Lettuce. Big oversight.
6 7 8 9 10
I aint sayin he a gold digger... Inspired Berge to wear a cape. Responsible for colossal amounts of liberal guilt. Arrested for torture, incompetence, being a ginger. Thought the earth was shaped like a womans breast. Attempted to fondle.
music is
putting the iPod on Mozarts Requiem. Lacrimosa.
Material Living
ethan BEAL-BROWN contributing writer
Somewhere in the back of my mind, the realization had already solidified. A more logical part of myself had dispassionately made its conclusion early in the evening as we packed the car. Either the dresser could fit, or my mom could fit, and there was to be no compromise. But darn if I was going to accept this ultimatum. In some perverse manner it threatened to establish an exchange-value between my stuff and my mother. The next morning I spent a good hour heaving away and rearranging and cramming stuff in drawers, but to no avail: the space of my car was unquestionably finite, and that was that. I had trouble accepting this fact partly because by now Ive been thoroughly brainwashed by American car advertisements. Those Friday evening SUV commercials that show four-kid families easily fitting a weeklong vacations worth of stuff into endlessly modular back compartmentsSimply pull a tab here, and the capacious interior rearranges to fit your needs? Nonsense. I admit that in the end I chose the dresser over my mother. Until then, my parents had been planning a weekend vacation after dropping me off. My despicable dresser and I made sure that didnt happen. No, I had come to see that old, brown armoire as the only kind and good thing standing between me and the empty cave of a room waiting for me in Providence. I had seen our empty house over the summer: the bare architecture revealed in its unflinching skeletal form, devoid of rug and lamp and chair to humanize the angles and soften the shadows. There is nothing to be done in the face of such a void but to throw oneself into filling it. This empty house at the corner of Power and Ives, our empty canvas, grinned a wide, maniacal grin and dared us to make our mark. I knew what was coming, and shoot if I wasnt going to make my house a home. *** Red and green and dark blue checkered bedspread. Walls populated with my grandfathers paintings. A dresser that smells of 20-year-old rat shit, a rug that has barely been saved from the piss of mice. There is a strange sort of hominess here. If the problem with my car was its lack of space, the house presented the opposite problem. Here, there was too much space, and the three of us spent the first sev-
film is
a house or a home?
eral weeks in a perpetual state of quasi-habitation. No one had thought to bring a can opener. A can opener is something you only recall exists once youre standing in front of the sole remaining item of food in the house and its locked in an unyielding tin can. And this isnt the half of it: theres a seemingly endless list of things you need in order to feign normalcy. Drying rack, frying pan, spatula, light bulbs, screwdriver, hammer, glue, wrench, rugs, couch, plumbing snake for the clogged sink, paper towels for the dog messes, shower curtain to hang against the wall to stop the leaking. Recently, in the name of getting more stuff, my housemate Steve and I made our way to a Quaker tag sale on Morris Ave. We werent really sure what we needed in particular, but had the sense that it would be a good thing to go. We found tables upon tables of things upon things. Thermoses that once must have been taken on picnics, wooden bowls that the children had used before they grew up and left at home, Uncle Adlers big old leather jacket, porcelain ducks with bows around their necks, 20 unmatched wine glasses. Its much too easy in such a place to convince yourself of new needs. But, pairing our keen eyes with the Quaker ethic of nonviolence in pricing, we ended up going home with a picnic basket, a bath mat, and a cutting board. And were all the better for it. This house, slowly but surely, is turning into a home.
wondering, why the f*ck does our editorin-chief hate popcorn?!? (Its f*cking disgusting, it gets in your teeth, it smells like death.)
theatre is
Mephistopheles in strappy S&M leather and studs.
books is
definitely not the aimless, George-Eliot loving main character in Jeffrey Eugenides The Marriage Plot.
food is
guest-swiping into the Ratty. We forgot how fabulous Belgium carrots are.
booze is
soaking the seeds in spirits. Let em bloom.
feature
POST-
I Swear(er)
Walking around campus, I keep a dark secret: I am not purebred Brunonian. I slipped into Brown alongside 81 mudblood transfers following my freshman year at Penn. Every day I learn more about my new home in Providence, like when I read Emily Spinners column, Community Works, in Post- on September 22. Welcome to Brown, Spinner explains to newbs like me, where injecting muscle into idealism means repudiating the false paradigm of me-to-you service, and instead embracing a spirit of community works thats manifestly more mutually beneficialbut only if you have the courage to leave the Brown Bubble. Spinner nails it, clarifying the trend thats transformed the service world for decades. But Spinner doesnt ask the most important question: If student culture entails service not just by throw[ing] money at the problem but by serving genuinely, is Brown University doing enough to meet the standard of its students? From what I see, the answer is no. For weeks here, Ive nodded attentively, taken advice eagerly (and gotten lost frequently). Now for once I can share some advice of my own, not despite my transfer past, but because of it. Thats because Penn leads the nation in a progressive model for university-community relations, one that leverages the entirety of university resources and incorporates them into vast spheres of collaborative community spaceand one that explicates the divide between the what is of Penns superlative example of university service and the could be of Browns. Penns success is real. Just skim the accolades of a ten-year crescendo, starting in 2002 when Penn ranked #1 in service learning in US News & World Report. Many national awards later, Penn capped its rise when the Savior of Our Cities report, listing the nations best university civic partnerships, ranked Penn #1 in 2009. Brown received Honorable Mention with 120 others. Penns success belongs to Ira Harkavy, the national expert on service learning and founder in 1992 of the Netter Center for Community Partnerships to address Penns abysmal relationship with West Philly. His idea was radical: rather than encourage student volunteers and hope for the best, Penn would classify the revitalization of West Phillya community that yielded little respect for Pennas a university priority, akin to
growing the endowment or hiring professors. Harkavys model centers on Anchor Institutions, university actors with central urban roles as landholders, job generators, and intellectual resources. The lynchpin of the concept is service learning, bringing students and communities together and cultivating democratic ideals through service. While the Netter Center is more complex than just the quotable Anchor credo, Penns undertaking has preserved a striking fidelity to Harkavys guiding theory. The results are in: the 20-year Anchor Institution experiment has erased Penns status as the worst offender of academic isolationism and catapulted it to the gold standard. Brown epitomizes the Anchor model. A massive employer for Providence, Brown generated $660 million in economic output in 2009. Graduates increasingly choose to live in Providence, a boon for the citys human capital, while Swearer has continually reinvigorated community partnerships. Providence is certainly a city in need, its poverty rate and mortgage crisis more pronounced than almost any other city. Harkavy has visited and engaged Brown with frequently. A BrownPenn civic partnership seems achievable. So what separates us? Penn protrudes into West Philly; Brown is more removed on the East Side. Penn wins with the larger endowment and numerous sub-schools. But Brown has major advantages: our idealism, creativity and compassion. Over 1,000 students volunteer annually through Swearer alonea ratio annihilating Penns. But compassion is not enough: the same report giving Brown an Honorable Mention ranked RISD #20 in the nation. How does a $2 billion universitys civic impact become eclipsed by RISD in the same city? It seems that method, not substance, explains this. Our countless student service organizations (in some of which I participate) are clearly doing phenomenal work.
But Brown institutionally seems reluctant to leverage its students into a ten-year centralized strategyand rightly so. That makes perfect sense given Browns culture and focus. Brown stresses the organic, Penn values structure. But those visions arent incompatible. Success requires us to adapt and survive. So what Penn ideas can we adapt to Brown ideals? I see three simple changes Brown could make to better utilize student service and fulfill its civic promise: Institute an Academically Based Community Service (ABCS) curriculum at Brown. ABCS courses, a massive success at Netter, study problems in both classrooms and bi-weekly field sites (HMOs, high schools, and community centers, to name a few). In the Open Curriculum, students choose what to study; ABCS lets students choose how to study, while integrating undergrads into engaged scholarship. Some departments already offer similar classes, and, with structure and funding, ABCS participation could skyrocket. Second, whichever civic blueprint Brown pursues, make Swearer central in that structure. Triple Swearers budgeta suggestion I can get away with because Swearers budget isnt public. So why not make it public? Some remember Swearers recessionera downsizing, but the solution to a condensed budget isnt hiding itits demanding an expansion. One solution is divorcing Swearers funding through an undisclosed fixed rate of the endowmenthow can Brown pursue a stable civic gameplan thats subject to market fluctuations? and instead make Swearer one of Browns unchanging financial commitments in the University budget. With new resources, Swearer could grow as a structural facilitator, running van services to ABCS field sites, which Netter conducts, or organizing monthly symposiums open to the public in West Providence. Last, expand UCAAP, already one the best civic advising resources at Brown, into a four-year Civic Scholars program (like Penns) that cul-
tivates Browns finest civic intellects. Browns Engaged Scholars would be UCAAP Extreme, an enclave of undergrads dedicated to a de facto concentration in serving Providence both as a groupregular collaborations in service, strategizing, and community seminarsbut also as individuals who complete fouryear capstone projects with public policy recommendations for Providence. These suggestions are realistic; they simply build on what already exists. Theyre not experimental and are proven to work. Dont ask Penn ask a West Philadelphian. If I could combine the best of Penn and Brown, I would eliminate the dichotomy of idealism and structural savvy. At Swearer, an upperclassman grilled me on urban poverty and challenged me to help; at Netter, a Wharton student confessed he couldnt remember his underprivileged mentees name, only tutoring him to better qualify for a banks human relations department. But another story illustrates the same divide: employee mortgages. Penn runs an office of Home Ownership Services, which manages two Penn-funded programs in Forgivable Loans and Cost Reduction; Penn manages the loan, designs the project, and executes a clear goal. Brown offers employees mortgage assistance on a dated webpage buried in Human Resources that directs curious employees to call listed contacts at three outof-state banks to obtain an undefined benefit. (An asterisk denotes that the banks compliance is totally voluntary and Brown assumes no direct interaction.) Isnt there a mortgage crisis going on in Providence? Yes, for what its worth, Browns intellectual idealism is far more appealing than the bare-fanged CEO-or-bust marathon at Penn. Brown students want to save the world, Penn students want to dominate it, goes the saying, but it belies a somber reality: idealism is not enough. Thats why Penn outshines usand leads the countryin urban service. I reject that as a statement about Brown students; clearly, we just need the institutional mechanisms to leverage our resources in Providence. But dont listen to the transfer. Justice doesnt spring from the pages of political science textbooks, writes Spinner, the pure-blood, in her call to civic arms. Thoughts alone never built a bridge. Shes right, and I should know. Its why I came to Brown.
If youre an unknowing member of the audience, youre not only left out of the circle of inside jokes but also left looking for the rare jokes not based on allusions. There is a middle ground between the explicit reference and the too subtle one, and its called satire. Some might say that Community falls under the umbrella of satire, but theyd be wrong. The show never goes far enough to count as satire: it only references, never going so far as to fully inhabit the tropes, clichs or style of what it would supposedly satirize. Its no Black Dynamite, and its certainly no Colbert Report. Why do people watch Community? Probably because its different. But what distinguishes the showits allusionsis now holding it back. Consistently find-
ing Community funny means finding the same gag funny time and again. That makes for a viewer as stunted as Abed especially when you consider that understanding all the references requires acquiring Abeds encyclopedic knowledge of pop culture. If Community wants to be a cultural touchstone like the ones it so frequently references, it will have to add something new to the television comedy. Unfortunately, the only real contenderthe freeform interactions between Abed and Troy, a former high school football staris treated as an afterthought, coming during the end credit sequence. A change is needed if Community doesnt want to jump the shark too soon.
Youll forgive if this grows personal, but in a sense, the man demands it. In the midst of the first of his three trials replayed and thrust under the microscope for close, elegant scrutiny in Moises Kaufmans Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde, showing since last weekend in Leeds Theatrethere comes a reference to the influence produced on an artist by a beautiful personality. Wearing a roguish grin and satin jacket, Wilde has a certain entrancement in his countenance and the amused tilt of his headeven under unfriendly scrutiny. Hes speaking, mesmerized, of Dorian Gray, the title character in his novel. But Im thinking instead of the influence produced Wilde himself, or, at least, his statue hidden in a corner of Dublins Merrion Square. In June 2008, I watched two traveling companions wildly (ha!) snap photos at the sitetugged madly about, it seemed, by the cameras in their hands as if they held the leashes of an excitable pack of Irish wolfhounds. The statue is appropriately atypical: Wilde lounges, chin in hand and eyes cast on a satiric upward trajectory. He sports a swanky suit of colored marble. He sprawlshalf-godlike, halflackadaisicalhigh atop a huge chunk of boulder. Visitors who chance upon it have a habit of clambering up the rock face to sit at the writers side and approximate his wry, clever expression, once theyve finished photographing the multitude of Wilde-isms inscribed on a few stout pillars nearby. Perched next to him on an Irish summer evening in the square, one feels oneself in the company of a dear frienda friend possessed of both a sharp tongue and a taste for the sumptuous. Lounging companionably at the side of Oscar Wilde in this quiet corner of the fair city, you think: what is it about the man? From whence the magnetism? From what source this magic effect, the perennial and persistent appeal? For persistent it is. Theres proof ready at hand on our own campus this semester, in the Department of Theatre Arts and Performance Studies, where not one but two Wildean plays are currently in productioneach one of a wildly (ha! again) singular ilk. The biographically meditative, edging-on-obsessive Gross Indecency by Kaufman, directed by Professor Kym Moore, plays through this weekend. It is set to be followed by Wildes bitingly satirical Lady Windermeres Fan, directed by Professor Lowry Marshall, later this month. If one is a blithe romp, the other is
more complicateda piece of theater understated, tragic, and peculiar. While Windermere is a testament to Wildes brilliant and dramatic flair with pen and paper, Gross Indecency stands for a certain brilliant and dramatic flair in living. Its subject matter is the consequent series of repercussions namely that, from 1895, Oscar Wilde withstood three grueling trials in London for his homosexuality. In the first of these, a libel suit against a statement terming him posing sodomite, Wilde gave testimony for the prosecution that quickly turned sour, resulting in his arrest soon afterward. In the ensuing trials, he was prosecuted in his own right twice over, and finally, jailed. While imprisoned, he developed health complications that led to an early death not long after his release. Preoccupied by cause and effect and irrevocability of this history, Gross Indecencys biographical precision is considerable. It is a play that plumbs history, sifting through the archives of these trials to excavate them for the present day. Yet the subtly spun majesty of the thing, and the scary thread of inevitability running through it, is not so much in history played out (however masterfully), but more in the compulsive pulse at the heart of the playan itching to get at the magnetism, the untouchability, the strange downfall of the literary giant that is Oscar Wilde. Like us, Gross Indecency is captivated by the man, wants to pal around at his side atop a boulder in Merrion Square without quite understanding his charm. And it is possessed by a cer-
tain intrigue that isas the minutes of stage time tick bypermitted to swell to all-consuming infatuation. Brian Cross 12, who plays Oscar Wilde in the production, describes him as a man who seems almost amorphous, who can adjust himself for his crowd, whose spirit is so hard to pin down and whose personality and values seem so hard to categorize. That is a major part of his charm, I feel. For all of his identities as a writer, a genius, a father, a husband, and what we today would call a homosexual, we ask ourselves who is this guy? As the play makes clear, the perennial appeal is in the personalityin all its mystery and bafflement. And as one watches Wilde disintegrate as he takes the stand three times over, the allure is somehow deepened. Smart, impish, eloquent, self-styled; controversial, an aesthete, a man who lived his own philosophies; ultimately conflicted, introspective in the extremeWilde is, in his way, a uniquely Brunonian figure. He is the kind of man whose cause we at Brown take up, not least because his persecution for his sexuality makes him in some sense a tormented hero of our liberal mindset. Still, our fascination is no new phenomenononly an ever-evolving one. Wildes contemporaries were as captivated as we. When he was jailed just before the start of the second trial, crowds swarmed his residence, where they bid with relish in auction that proves (replayed onstage) a wrenching gut moment. Steep prices were handed over for every last manuscript and personal possession
belonging to the famous, now infamous, Oscar Wilde. It is with an equally sensationalist fascination that Gross Indecency makes its own foray into collecting and dissecting the pieces of Wilde. Director Moore takes pains to foreground that her production is nothing if not this: a staged moment, a performance, another bold and infatuated and in a sense impossible attempt to understand a peculiarly compelling figureand for that alone, her production is peculiarly compelling in its own right. The actors enter as ordinary students might, speaking in their own American accents and thumbing through books and papers on a table center stage. The British accents and other mannerisms they begins to affect as the play picks up are quite consciously just thisaffectedand as the play reaches its pinnacle and comes to an end, the characters subside, once again, into the students they really are awed and puzzled, a full century after the fact. This is to say that beyond any piece of fact-finding, historical narrative, or journalism, and beyond any replay of Wildes downfall, Gross Indecency is this: an expression of deep curiosity. And yet: nothing worth knowing can be taught, chirps one fruit of the Wildean wit. Which means, perhaps, that we can never really hope to understand the man who wrote these words. All the same, we hang onto him, hold him up to the lightperhaps for his art and for what he endured, but surely most of all for his personality, as a figure to reverence and even mythologize. At the Oscar Wilde statue in June 2008, one friend of mine and his camera gravitated, mesmerized, toward this one epigram in particular that nothing worth knowing can be taughtpossessed by some desperate wish to snap a photo that would reflect the photographer himself in the black marble beneath this scrawled quotation. In that instant, it seemed Oscar Wilde had summed up the worldview of my would-be rebellious friend, age 18. They were kindred spirits, one sensed. Communing across the years, mentor to mentee, more than a century after the mans death. It was mysterious moment, but then, Oscar Wilde was mysterious man. Just chalk it up to the influence produced by one beautiful personality.
lifestyle
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 6TH, 2011
The iced part: 1/3 cup butter, softened 1 teaspoon vanilla 2 cups powdered sugar 1/4 cup milk
Preheat oven to 350 F. Combine flour, baking powder, baking soda, salt, cinnamon, and allspice in medium bowl. Beat the butter and granulated sugar in large mixer bowl for 30 seconds. Add pumpkin, the egg, and the vanilla extract; beat until blended. Gradually add flour mixture into pumpkin mixture at low speed until combined. Stir in chocolate chips and nuts. Drop by rounded teaspoons onto baking sheets. Eat some of the dough, but try to reserve at least half the batter for cookies. Self control, Padawan. Bake for 12 to 15 minutes or until edges are golden brown. Cool on a rack, and drizzle each cookie with glaze (I like to pipe it in zigzags through a baggie with the corner clipped: Technique lies in the speed, good friend). Icing: Beat butter and vanilla extract in medium mixer bowl until creamy. Gradually beat in powdered sugar and milk until smooth (frosting will be thin). Now thats some good pumpkin shit.
realm of the monster truck rally. Shep wanted to prove he could make anything cool. And he did. Andres face can still be found today on Thayer Street. Nice Slice, which Al Read and his business partner opened in 2005, remains the counter-culture bastion for Thayer, an unofficial Brown domain. Andre stickers litter the counter and the Giants eyes leer ominously on the wall. Fairey also designed the popular pizza places logo, and his art is displayed there with abandon. The Slice is sort of a mindless thingevery good experience begins or ends with a slice of pizza, Read said. Faireys Andre (OBEY) the giant and its origins are largely forgotten in Providence, faded like sun-bleached sticker. If this is the end of the icon that defined dissent for a generation, I cant think of a better resting place than the Slice. Next time you get a sliver of Space Junk pizza, snag an Andre sticker. OBEY.
lifestyle
POST-
Dear Emily, My friend has heinous facial hair. You may be familiar with the chinstrap, the hipster mustache, etcetera, but believe me when I tell you that youve never seen a scragglier, more unappealing beard. And yet, he loves it. Should I destroy his illusion that hes projecting rugged manliness, or continue to indulge him? Uncertain about Gross Hair Dear Uncertain, Allow me to enhance your vocabulary. The word of the day is pogomaniac, which means someone who is obsessed with having a beard no matter what anyone says about negative aspects of beards. You see, dear UGH, this facial fixation is not an endearing idiosyncrasy. It is an illness. When it comes to appalling facial hair, there can be no debate, no delay, no dithering: You must act, and act immediately. You may choose one of two approaches. First, and most tactfully, you may attempt to improve the appearance of his beard. Is it merely insufficiently groomed? Young men, astonished and delighted by their entrance into late-stage puberty, tend