Test Report Based On en 45001

Test report based on EN 45001
Test laboratory:
No.:
748 / 01
Link Test According to the specifications laid down in EN 50173:1995 + A1:2000 Unshielded Class D Interconnect Channel and Permanent Link
Project number:
BRRNA020
Registriernummer: TTI-P-G187/00-00
This test report consists of 33 pages plus annex. GHMT mbH and the customers shall grant each other an unlimited right to copy and disclose this report insofar as the measuring results and specifications published are neither modified nor rendered incomplete. Third parties are not permitted to copy this report or excerpts thereof nor misuse it in any other fashion without obtaining our written approval.
Link Test to the specifications laid down in EN 50173:1995 + A1:2000 Class D Interconnect Channel and Permanent Link
Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01
Table of Contents
1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2 2.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 GENERAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................................... 3 Test Laboratory.............................................................................................................................. 3 Test Date........................................................................................................................................ 3 Test Site ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Test Conducted by ......................................................................................................................... 3 Persons Present at Test .................................................................................................................. 3 CUSTOMER.................................................................................................................................... 4 Address .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Responsible compartment.............................................................................................................. 4 EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST (EUT) .............................................................................................. 5 Description of the Components ..................................................................................................... 5 Component Order .......................................................................................................................... 5 Acceptance of Components ........................................................................................................... 6 Definition of the Equipment Under Test (EUT) ............................................................................ 6
4 TEST TYPE ..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Reference of testing ....................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Test parameters.............................................................................................................................. 8 4.2.1 Attenuation ........................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.2 Near-End Cross-Talk (NEXT) ............................................................................................ 10 4.2.3 Power-Sum Near-End Cross-Talk (PS NEXT) ................................................................... 11 4.2.4 Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (ACR) ............................................................................. 12 4.2.5 Power-Sum Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (PS ACR) .................................................... 12 4.2.6 Equal-Level Far-End Cross-Talk (EL FEXT) .................................................................... 13 4.2.7 Power-Sum Equal-Level Far-End Cross-Talk (PS EL FEXT) ........................................ 14 4.2.8 Return Loss......................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.9 Longitudinal (to Differential) Conversion Loss (LCL)....................................................... 16 4.2.10 Delay .................................................................................................................................. 17 4.2.11 Delay Skew ......................................................................................................................... 18 4.2.12 Transfer impedance (Not measured in this test report)...................................................... 19 5 RULES AND REGULATIONS..................................................................................................... 20 5.1 Rules and Regulations Applied.................................................................................................... 20 5.2 Class E Limits in the Permanent Link and in the Channel........................................................... 20 5.2.1 Limits Permanent Link ....................................................................................................... 21 5.2.2 Limits Channel ................................................................................................................... 21 5.3 Deviations .................................................................................................................................... 22 5.4 None-Standardized Test Procedures ............................................................................................ 22 6 7 8 TEST EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................................... 23 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 24 ANNEX: DOCUMENTATION OF MEASUREMENTS ............................................................. 26
Test laboratory: Gesellschaft fr Hochfrequenz-Metechnik mbH, Bexbach/Germany Page 2 of 33 Officialy certified test laboratory according to DIN EN ISO/IEC 17025 and member of eurolab-Germany, inc.
1 General information 1.1 Test Laboratory

GHMT mbH Gesellschaft fr Hochfrequenz-Metechnik mbH In der Kolling 13 D-66450 Bexbach / Germany Phone: +49 / 6826 / 9228 - 0 Fax: +49 / 6826 / 9228 - 99
1.2 Test Date

All test parameters were tested during the period from 17 and 18 January.
1.3 Test Site

Analog-lab of GHMT mbH, Bexbach
1.4 Test Conducted by

Frank Streibert, engineer, general manager and laboratory manager at GHMT mbH Bernd Jung, technical assistent to the laboratory management, GHMT mbH
1.5 Persons Present at Test

None
Customer
2.1 Address
Brand-Rex GmbH Im Taubental 58 D-41468 Neuss Phone: Fax: +49 / 2131 / 3609 - 0 +49 / 2131 / 3609 - 99
2.2 Responsible compartment

Brand-Rex GmbH Mr. Manfred Braun Im Taubental 58 D-41468 Neuss Phone: +49 / 2131 / 3609 - 45 Fax: +49 / 2131 / 3609 - 99 e-mail: mbraun@brand-rex.com
Equipment Under Test (EUT)
3.1 Description of the Components

GHMT mbH received the following components from the customer in order to conduct the test:
Patchcord/ Work area cord Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-PC-U-xxx-888-y Length: 5m xxx = length y = H = LSF/OH IEC332.1 y = -- = PVC IEC332.1 GPU-P24-(HF1), 4Pair 24 AWG UTP RJ45 one side, Typ Stew.Enh. Cat.5 S.37
Cable: Plug: Patchpanel
Brand-Rex Typ: GPU-PNL-U-xx-yz-2M xx = 16, 24, 32, 48 = 16, 24, 32, 48 Port y = Pre-assembled accordimg to TIA 568 A, B z = 1, K = 110 , LSA connectivity
Data cable
Brand-Rex Typ: GPU-xxx-y Length: 90 m xxx = HF1, HF3 = LSF/OH IEC332.1, IEC332.3c xxx = ----- = PVC IEC332.1 y = D = Duplex, shotgun
Outlet
Brand-Rex Typ:
GPC-JAK-U-xy-3
x = A, B = Pre-assembled according to TIA 568 A, B y = 1, K = 110, LSA connectivity
3.2 Component Order

The cables and components listed were ordered from the customer Brand-Rex GmbH Im Taubental 58 D-41468 Neuss
3.3 Acceptance of Components

The link components currently undergoing the test were delivered to the GHMT mbH facilities on 9. January 2001. They had no visible defects.
3.4 Definition of the Equipment Under Test (EUT)

According to the specifications laid down in the document ISO/IEC 11801: 1995/FDAM 2:1999(E) (distributed on 21 July 1999 by Deutsche Elektrotechnische Kommission im DIN und VDE), an interconnect channel was assembled in order to conduct the test: Patchcord Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-PC-U-xxx-888-y -Length: 5 m xxx = Length y = H = LSF/OH IEC332.1 y = -- = PVC IEC332.1 Cable: G6U-P24_(HF1), 4Pair 24 AWG UTP single-ended assembly with RJ45, Typ Stew.Enh. Cat.5 Patchpanel Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-PNL-U-xx-yz-2M
xx = 16, 24, 32, 48 = 16, 24, 32, 48 Port y = A, B = Pre-assembled according to TIA 568 A, B z = 1, K = 110, LSA Connectivity
Installation cable
Brand-Rex Typ: GPU-xxx-y Length: 90 m

xxx = HF1, HF3 = LSF/OH IEC332.1, IEC332.3c xxx = ----- = PVC IEC332.1 y = D = Duplex, Shotgun
Telecommunication Outlet
Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-JAK-U-xy-3 x = A,B = Pre-assembled according to TIA/EIA 568 A y = 1, K = 110, LSA connectivity Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-PC-U-xxx-888-y Length: 5 m xxx = Length y = H = LSF/OH IEC332.1 y = -- = PVC IEC332.1 Cable: G6U-P24_(HF1), 4Pair 24 AWG UTP single-ended assembly with RJ45, Typ: Stew.Enh. Cat.5
Work area cable
Picture 1: Definition of permanent link and channel in reference to ISO/IEC 11801:1995/FDAM 2: 1999(E)
4 Test Type 4.1 Reference of testing

Test carried out an interconnect channel and a permanent link with four transmission channels according to ISO/IEC 11801:1995/FDAM 2:1999. The informative assessment is based on the Class E specifications according to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 3 Draft 598. The test comprised all transmission-related parameters required.
4.2 Test parameters

The following test parameters from part of the test conducted according to section 4.1

Attenuation Near-end Crosstalk (NEXT) Power-sum near-end crosstalk attenuation (PS NEXT) Attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (ACR) Power-sum attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (PS ACR) Equal level far-end crosstalk attenuation (ELFEXT) Power-sum equal level far-end crosstalk attenuation (PS ELFEXT) Return loss Longitudinal to differential conversion loss (LCL) Delay Delay skew Loop resistance
4.2.1 Attenuation
W G
SNA 2 100 Hz -
Transmitter Receiver
Baluns
SMZ
75 / 105
A
Pair of cores
SMZ
75 / 105 Oh
Definition
The attenuation is determined by the ratio of the power supplied at port A and the power measured at port B.
P a V [dB] = 10 log A PB
Input and output of the two-port network have to be terminated with the line's nominal characteristic impedance in order to avoid return loss. Influencing factors The attenuation of cables is largely determined by the crosssectional area and the conductivity of the copper conductors. In particular in very high frequency ranges, the dielectric loss of the core insulation material contributes to an increase in the attenuation in proportion to the frequency. The attenuation temperature. Meaning depends on length, frequency and
A low attenuation improves the transmission reliability of the cabling link. The attenuation of cables and connecting hardware accumulates but it is primarily determined by the cabling.
4.2.2 Near-End Cross-Talk (NEXT)
W G
SNA 2 100 Hz -
Baluns
SMZ
75 / 105
Pair of cores 1
Zo
SMZ
75 / 105
Pair of cores 2
Zo
Definition
The near-end cross-talk loss is determined by the ratio of the power supplied at port A to the power measured at port B.
P a N [dB] = 10 log A PB
The EUT has to be terminated on both ends with the characteristic impedance. If transmitter and receiver are positioned at the same end of the EUT, the parameter is referred to as near-end cross-talk (NEXT). Influencing factors The near-end cross-talk of cables is decisively influenced by the stranding and the foil pair shield (if applicable). Near-end cross-talk strongly depends on the frequency used and only to a minor extent on the cabling length. Meaning A high degree of near-end cross-talk improves transmission reliability. The transmission reliability within the cabling link is largely determined by the component with the lowest degree of near-end cross-talk.
4.2.3 Power-Sum Near-End Cross-Talk (PS NEXT)
SUA-71
50 / 100 Ohm
100 100 100 100
Power Splitter
50 / 100 Ohm
SUA-71
50 / 100 Ohm
SUA-71
50 / 100 Ohm
SUA-71
Definition
The power sum of the near-end cross-talk is defined on the basis of the ratio of the power input at the three pairs A, B and C to the power output at pair D. The power-sum NEXT value of cables can be measured by means of a phasecorrelated 4-port power splitter. On the basis of the pair-topair NEXT measurements, the power sum can also be calculated according to the following formula:
a PSNEXT [dB] = 10 log

Influencing factors
10
i =1
- 0,1 a iNEXT
The power-sum NEXT value of cables is decisively influenced by the stranding and the foil pair shield (if applicable). Power-sum NEXT strongly depends on the frequency used and only to a minor extent on the cabling length. With regard to network protocols that distribute the bidirectional data load over all four pairs, power-sum NEXT is of great importance for transmission reliability since power-sum cross-talk is expected to impair transmission via the data channel.
Meaning
4.2.4 Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (ACR)

Definition The ratio of the level of the incoming useful signal to the noise level at the opposite end of the measured link is referred to as Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (abbr. ACR). ACR may be interpreted as the signal-to-noise ratio with the near-end cross-talk being regarded as the interfering signal or noise.
ACR [dB] = a N [dB] - a V [dB]
Calculation
As agreed, the ACR value is calculated for every frequency response of the near-end cross-talk with the two relevant frequency responses of the attenuation. Alternatively, the minimum value of the ACR calculation may be allocated for every measuring point of the two attenuation values involved. The determination of the double-ended system dynamics thus results in 12 ACR frequency responses for a four-pair specimen.
Meaning
The ACR value is of decisive importance to system designers, system manufacturers and operators of data communications equipment since it provides immediate insight into system dynamics and system reserve. The larger the distance between the useful signal and the noise signal over the entire frequency range, the larger the infrastructural reserve.
4.2.5 Power-Sum Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (PS ACR)

Definition The power sum of the ACR reserve is calculated as follows:
PS ACR [dB] = aPSNEXT [dB] aV [dB]

Meaning With regard to network protocols that distribute the bidirectional data load over all four pairs, power-sum ACR is of great importance for transmission reliability since crosstalk is expected to impair transmission via the data channel.
4.2.6 Equal-Level Far-End Cross-Talk (EL FEXT)
Receiver 1 Receiver 2 Transmitter Balun

50 / 100 Ohm
Balun
50 / 100 Ohm
SUA-71
SUA-71
Balun 100
50 / 100 Ohm
SUA-71
Definition
The equal-level far-end cross-talk (abbr. EL FEXT) is determined by the ratio of the power measured at the remote port B to the power measured at the remote port C. The measuring signal is supplied to the near end of the cable.
P a ELFEXT [dB] = 10 log B P C

All pairs of the EUT are terminated with their characteristic impedance. Influencing factors The EL FEXT value of cables is decisively influenced by the stranding and the foil pair shield (if applicable). EL FEXT strongly depends on the frequency used.
4.2.7 Power-Sum Equal-Level Far-End Cross-Talk (PS EL FEXT)

Definition The power-sum EL FEXT value can be calculated on the basis of the pair-to-pair EL FEXT measurements according to the following formula:
a PSELFEXT [dB] = 10 log
10
i =1
i - 0,1 a ELFEXT
Meaning
With regard to network protocols that distribute the bidirectional data load over all four pairs, power-sum EL FEXT is of great importance for transmission reliability since cross-talk is expected to impair transmission via the data channel.
4.2.8 Return Loss
W G
SNA 2 100 Hz - 180 MHz
Receiver Transmitter Differential-mode termination without return loss
UUT
Balun
SMZ
75 / 105 Ohm
R=Z Pair of Cores
Return loss measuring bridge
Definition
The return loss represents the ratio of the power supplied to the EUT to the power reflected by the EUT. Pinput a R [dB] = 10 log P output
The EUT end is terminated with the characteristic impedance in order to absorb any non-reflected power. The EUT and the test-value transmitter must have the same rated impedance in the broadband range. Influencing factors The return loss value of cables is decisively influenced by the homogeneity of the conductors and the core of the cable. Mechanical load during the manufacturing or installation of the cables may impair the return loss. The parameters return loss and characteristic impedance correlate. Meaning A high degree of return loss improves the transmission reliability. A low degree of return loss may lead to an unwanted overlap of returning signal components.
4.2.9 Longitudinal (to Differential) Conversion Loss (LCL)
W G
SNA 2 100 Hz - 180 MHz
Receiver
Transmitter
Commonmode/differentialmode termination without return loss Symmetricalbrc Symme trie me measuring bridge
SMB-54A 20kHz-100MHz
Pair of Cores
Definition
The longitudinal to differential conversion loss (abbr. LCL) represents the ratio of the differential-mode wave input in the EUT to the common-mode wave output from the EUT. Pdifferenti al mod e LCL [dB] = 10 log P common mod e
The EUT end is terminated with the corresponding characteristic impedance for both wave shapes. Influencing factors The LCL value of data transmission cables is decisively influenced by the homogeneity of the cores and the uniform stranding. An ideally balanced data transmission cable would also be resistant to external electromagnetic interference without any shielding. The LCL value and the earth coupling correlate. Meaning A high degree of LCL reduces the susceptibility of the EUT to any disturbing electromagnetic interference.
4.2.10 Delay
W G
SNA 2 100 Hz - 180
Baluns
SMZ
75 / 105
A
Pair of Cores
SMZ
75 / 105
Definition
The velocity of propagation v of cables is stated in relation to the maximum velocity of propagation of electromagnetic waves in the vacuum co. The parameter "Nominal Velocity of Propagation" (abbr. NVP) is defined as follows:
NVP =
co
The delay is the period of time the signal requires in order to travel through a cabling link with a length of l. The delay is calculated on the basis of the NVP value (Nominal Velocity of Propagation) of the cable and the velocity of light c0 according to the following formula:
=
Influencing factors
l NVP c0
The delay of cables is decisively influenced by the dielectric loss of the core insulation material. This material-induced loss may be minimised by selecting various compounds and by varying the degree of foaming. The impact of colour addition on the NVP value is not to be neglected since the colours vary strongly in their dielectric constants, which are considerably higher than in the basic compound.
Influencing factors (continued)
The velocity of propagation does not depend on the cable length and may be calculated on the basis of the measurement of the length-dependent group delay. The reference length used for calculation is the cable length and not the lay length of the twisted pairs. Different lay length values in the four pairs lead to different NVP values. In order to ensure distortion-free signal transmission, the velocity of propagation must not fall below a lower limiting value, which is determined by the system requirements. The velocity of propagation has to be virtually independent of the frequency within the signal bandwidth in order to avoid a divergence of the spectral signal components. High-bit rate network protocols that use parallel data transmission via the four pairs, moreover, require a highly consistent velocity of propagation in order to avoid synchronisation errors. Future normative standards will define this so-called "delay skew".
Meaning
4.2.11 Delay Skew

Definition The delay skew of cables with a length of l marks the time difference between signals travelling along the individual transmission links at the propagation velocity vi,j.
vi v j = l vi v j
Influencing factors Meaning The delay skew of cables is decisively influenced by the dielectric loss of the core insulation material and the various lay length values. The delay skew will be an important parameter for a distortion-free data transmission in balanced cables in view of future network protocols.
4.2.12 Transfer impedance (Not measured in this test report)
Network analyzer
Data link = 0.5 m
50 ohms
Parallel wire Specimen
Screened cabin
Definition
As soon as an electromagnetic wave reaches a screen, it induces an interference current IDisturb.. This current produces a voltage UDisturb. along the inner conductor. The coupling factor
= U Disturbance
Disturbance
has the dimension of a complex impedance and is called transfer impedance ZT. The transfer impedance consists of a real part i.e. the coupling resistance RC and an imaginary part. In many cases, only the coupling resistance will be of practical importance for the evaluation of the shielding effectiveness. The coupling impedance has the dimension m. In case of data cables it is indicated per unit of length and has the dimension m/m. Influencing variables In case of shielded cables, the coupling resistance is primarily determined by the mechanical structure of the braided screen and/or by inserted foil screens. The coupling resistance is very much dependent on the frequency. The better the effectiveness of a shield is, the smaller is the value of the coupling resistance.
Significance
Rules and Regulations
5.1 Rules and Regulations Applied
EN 50173:1995 + A1:2000 from july 2000 Information technology - Generic cabling for customer premises ISO/IEC 11801:1995 + A1:1999(E) Information technology - Generic cabling for customer premises ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG3 N598 (05/00) ISO/IEC 11801 2nd edition: Clauses as approved by WG 3 at Sydney and as proposed by editors for consideration (working draft) TIA 568 A Add.1-4, TSB 95 & Add.5 (Cat.5e)(1999) TIA 568 A 1995 & Add 1-4
5.2 Class D Limits in the Permanent Link and in the Channel

The limits were derived from the "4-connector model" with the transition point and the consolidation point serving as worst-case assumptions. The interconnect channel specified by the customers for the test represents a "2-connector model". More stringent normative limit requirements for the interconnect channel described in ISO/IEC 11801:1995/FDAM2:1999(E) are currently not scheduled. The limits contained in the current working document ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG3 N552 (03/99) are currently under consultation. Upon their approval, the requirements will be included in the 2nd Draft of ISO/IEC 11801. Class D requirements are stated for limit frequencies in the following section. However, they have to be adhered to over the entire transmission bandwidth by means of an appropriate interpolation of the limits.
5.2.1 Limits Permanent Link
PS EL FEXT / dB
Frequency / MHz
Return Loss / dB
Attenuation / dB
1 4 10 16 20 31,25 62,5 100
2,1 4,1 6,1 7,8 8,7 11,0 16,0 20,6
61,2 51,8 45,4 42,3 40,7 37,6 32,7 29,3
58,2 48,8 42,5 39,3 37,7 34,6 29,7 26,3
59,1 47,7 39,4 34,5 32,0 26,6 16,7 8,7
56,1 44,7 36,4 31,5 29,0 23,6 13,7 5,7
59,6 47,6 39,6 35,5 33,6 29,7 23,7 19,6
57,0 45,0 37,0 32,9 31,0 27,1 21,1 17,0
17,0 17,0 17,0 17,0 17,0 15,6 13,5 12,1
0,522 0,504 0,497 0.495 0,494 0,492 0,490 0,498
0,043 0,043 0,043 0,043 0,043 0,043 0,043 0,043
Schedule 1: Limits in reference to EN 50173:1995 + A1:2000 (Permanent Link)
5.2.2 Limits Channel
PS EL FEXT / dB
Frequency / MHz
Return Loss / dB
Attenuation / dB
1 4 10 16 20 31,25 62,5 100
2,5 4,5 7,0 9,2 10,3 12,8 18,5 24,0
60,3 50,6 44,0 40,6 39,0 35,7 30,6 27,1
57,3 47,6 41,0 37,6 36,0 32,7 27,6 24,1
57,8 46,1 37,0 31,4 28,7 22,9 12,1 3,1
54,8 43,1 34,0 28,4 25,7 19,9 9,1 0,1
57,0 45,0 37,0 32,9 31,0 27,1 21,1 17,0
54,4 42,4 34,4 30,3 28,4 24,5 18,5 14,4
17,0 17,0 17,0 17,0 17,0 15,1 12,1 10,0
40 ffs 30 ffs ffs ffs ffs ffs
0,580 0,562 0,555 0,553 0,552 0,550 0,549 0,548
0,050 0,050 0,050 0,050 0,050 0,050 0,050 0,050
Schedule 2: Limits in reference to EN 50173:1995 + A1:2000 (Channel)
Delay Skew / ns
EL FEXT / dB
PS NEXT / dB
PS ACR / dB
NEXT / dB
Delay / ns
ACR / dB
LCL / dB
Delay Skew / s
EL FEXT / dB
PS NEXT / dB
PS ACR / dB
NEXT / dB
Delay / s
ACR / dB
LCL / dB
5.3 Deviations
The test was conducted with the following deviations in the test set-up and test procedure as compared to ISO/IEC 11801:
The test set-up corresponds to the interconnect channel that is used as a link with two plug-jack transitions.
5.4 None-Standardized Test Procedures

None.
6 Test equipment
The following test equipment was used for the measurements:
Equipment Spectrum Networkanalyzer RLC-Meter Reference clamp
Label
Manufacturer
Technical Datas 50 9 kHz - 4 GHz 0,10 % accuracy 50 / 100 1 MHz - 1,2 GHz 50 / 100 1 MHz 1,5 GHz 50 100 kHz - 350 MHz 0,025 m resolution 1 m resolution ---
Last Calibration
ZVRE
Rohde & Schwarz Fluke GHMT
01/00
PM 6304 KRMZ 1200-A
12/98 before use
Reference clamp Symmetry measuring bridge Time-DomainReflectometer Digital -Voltmeter Measuring equipment
KRMZ 1500-A
GHMT Analog Elektronik Tektronix Hewlett-Packard GHMT
before use
SMB-61
before use
1502 C 3455 A ---
-------
Summary
Brand-Rex GmbH Im Taubental 58 D-41468 Neuss Telefon: Telefax: +49 / 2131 / 3609 0 +49 / 2131 / 3609 99
Customer
Test laboratory
Gesellschaft fr Hochfrequenz-Metechnik mbH In der Kolling 13 D-66450 Bexbach / Germany Phone: +49 / 6826 / 9228 0 Fax: +49 / 6826 / 9228 99
Test report Equipment Under Test (EUT)
Test report no. 748/00 from 18th january 2001. Certification of transmission characteristics with respect to high-frequency behaviour. The EUT was a 90 m permanent link and a 100 m interconnect channel without any transition- or consolidation point. The EUT presented for the test is described by the following product features and type data: Patchcord/ Work area Cord Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-PC-U-xxx-888-y Length: 5 m Xxx = Length y = H = LSF/OH IEC332.1 y = -- = PVC IEC332.1 Cable: GPU-P24-(HF1), 4 Pair 24 AWG UTP one side pre-assembled with RJ45 Typ Stew.Enh. Cat.5 Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-PNL-U-xx-yz-2M xx = 16, 24, 32, 48 = 16, 24, 36, 48 Port y = A, B = Pre-assembled according to TIA 568 A, B z = 1, K = 110, LSA connectivity Installation- Brand-Rex Typ: GPU-xxx-y UTP cable Length: 90 m xxx = HF1, HF3 = LSF/OH IEC332.1, IEC332.1 xxx = ----- = PVC IEC332.1 y = D = Duplex, Shotgun Outlet Brand-Rex Typ: GPC-JAK-U-xy-3 x = A, B = Pre-assembled according to TIA 568 A, B y = 1, K = 110, LSA connectivity
Patchpanel
Applied valuation standards
EN 50173:1995 + A1:2000 from july 2000-11-04 Information technology Generic cabling for customer premises ISO/IEC 11801:1995 + A1:1999(E) Information technology Generic cabling for customer premises ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25 WG3 N598 (05/00) ISO/IEC 11801 2nd edition: Clauses as approved by WG 3 at Sydney and as proposed by editors for consideration (working draft) TIA 568 A Add.1-4, TSB 95 & Add.5 (Cat.5e)(1999) TIA 568 A 1995 & Add.1-4 Attenuation Near-end crosstalk attenuation (NEXT) Power-sum near-end crosstalk attenuation (PS NEXT) Attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (ACR) Power-sum attenuation to crosstalk loss ratio (PS ACR) Equal level far-end crosstalk attenuation (ELFEXT) Power-sum equal level far-end crosstalk attenuation (PS ELFEXT) Delay Delay skew Return loss Longitudinal to differential conversion loss (LCL) Loop resistance
Test parameters

Comments
The results obtained during the test refer to the EUT described. Future technical modifications of the data transmission cable and the connectors are the manufacturers responsibility. The EUT is within the normative limits laid down in the specified documents as far as the aforementioned test parameters are concerned. The conformity of the Permanent Link and the Interconnect Channel tested with the Class D reqiurements (100 MHz) are confirmed for all pin combinations.
Bexbach / Germany 18th january 2001
F. Streibert, engineer (Laboratory manager)
8 Annex: Documentation of measurements

As annex of this test report the test results are documented as frequency responses.
Summary of the measured low-frequency-parameters:
Loop Resistance Permanent Link Pair 12 36 45 78 Loop resistance in 12,64 12,67 12,66 12,70
Loop Resistance Channel Pair 12 36 45 78 Loop resistance in 15,83 15,83 15,84 15,90
The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Measuring equipment Level Frequency Average Length Fluke PM 6304 RLC-Meter 50 mV DC Yes 90 m (Permanent Link) 100 m (Channel) The limit in reference to ISO/IEC 11801 for loop resistance is 40 in the channel and 34 in the Permanent Link.
Limit
Summary of the measured high-frequency-parameters: All power-sum parameters are calculated out of individual pair-to-pair measurements. Furthermore the ACR-values and the delay skew are determined by calculation. Attenuation The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Networkanalysor Output Power Frequency Range IF-Filter Resolution Average Smoothing Noise floor Impedance Matching of specimen Rohde & Schwarz ZVRE 10 Hz 4 GHz 0 dBm 1 MHz 100 MHz 300 Hz 2000 measurement points in logarithmic distribution None None A dynamic range of 135 dB was verified 50 Cable reference measuring clamp 1200 of GHMT Cable reference measuring clamp 1500 of GHMT
NEXT The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Networkanalysor Output Power Frequency Range IF-Filter Resolution Average Smoothing Noise floor Impedance Matching of specimen Rohde & Schwarz ZVRE 10 Hz 4 GHz 0 dBm 1 MHz 100 MHz 30 Hz 2000 measurement points in logarithmic distribution None None A dynamic range of 135 dB was verified 50 Cable reference measuring clamp 1200 of GHMT
EL FEXT The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Networkanalysor Output Power Frequency Range IF-Filter Resolution Average Smoothing Noise floor Impedance Matching of specimen Rohde & Schwarz ZVRE 10 Hz 4 GHz 0 dBm 1 MHz 100 MHz 30 Hz 2000 measurement points in logarithmic distribution None None A dynamic range of 135 dB was verified 50 Cable reference measuring clamp 1200 of GHMT Cable reference measuring clamp 1500 of GHMT
Delay The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Networkanalysor Output Power Frequency Range IF-Filter Resolution Average Smoothing Noise floor Impedance Matching of specimen Rohde & Schwarz ZVRE 10 Hz 4 GHz 0 dBm 1 MHz 100 MHz 100 Hz 2000 measurement points in linear distribution None None A dynamic range of 135 dB was verified 50 Cable reference measuring clamp 1200 of GHMT Cable reference measuring clamp 1500 of GHMT
Return loss The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Networkanalysor Output Power Frequency Range IF-Filter Resolution Average Smoothing Noise floor Impedance Matching of specimen Rohde & Schwarz ZVRE 10 Hz 4 GHz -10 dBm 1 MHz 100 MHz 300 Hz 2000 measurement points in logarithmic distribution None None A dynamic range of 60 dB was verified 50 Cable reference measuring clamp 1200 of GHMT
Longitudinal conversion loss The following adjustments were basis for the measuring equipment: Networkanalysor Output Power Frequency Range IF-Filter Resolution Average Smoothing Noise floor Impedance Matching of specimen Rohde & Schwarz ZVRE 10 Hz 4 GHz 0 dBm 0,1 MHz 100 MHz 30 Hz 2000 measurement points in logarithmic distribution None None A dynamic range of 45 dB was verified at 100 MHz 50 Symmetry measuring bridge
All power-sum parameters are calculated out of individual pair-to-pair measurements. Furthermore the ACR-values and the delay skew are determined by calculation.

Test Report Based On en 45001

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Test Report Based On en 45001

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Test report based on EN 45001

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

1 General information 1.1 Test Laboratory

1.2 Test Date

1.3 Test Site

1.4 Test Conducted by

1.5 Persons Present at Test

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

2.2 Responsible compartment

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

Equipment Under Test (EUT)

3.1 Description of the Components

Cable: Plug: Patchpanel

x = A, B = Pre-assembled according to TIA 568 A, B y = 1, K = 110, LSA connectivity

3.2 Component Order

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

3.3 Acceptance of Components

3.4 Definition of the Equipment Under Test (EUT)

Brand-Rex Typ: GPU-xxx-y Length: 90 m

Work area cable

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4 Test Type 4.1 Reference of testing

4.2 Test parameters

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.2 Near-End Cross-Talk (NEXT)

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.3 Power-Sum Near-End Cross-Talk (PS NEXT)

100 100 100 100

a PSNEXT [dB] = 10 log

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.4 Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (ACR)

ACR [dB] = a N [dB] - a V [dB]

4.2.5 Power-Sum Attenuation-to-Cross-Talk Ratio (PS ACR)

PS ACR [dB] = aPSNEXT [dB] aV [dB]

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.6 Equal-Level Far-End Cross-Talk (EL FEXT)

Receiver 1 Receiver 2 Transmitter Balun

P a ELFEXT [dB] = 10 log B P C

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.7 Power-Sum Equal-Level Far-End Cross-Talk (PS EL FEXT)

a PSELFEXT [dB] = 10 log

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.8 Return Loss

SNA 2 100 Hz - 180 MHz

Receiver Transmitter Differential-mode termination without return loss

R=Z Pair of Cores

Return loss measuring bridge

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.9 Longitudinal (to Differential) Conversion Loss (LCL)

SNA 2 100 Hz - 180 MHz

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

SNA 2 100 Hz - 180

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

Influencing factors (continued)

4.2.11 Delay Skew

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01

4.2.12 Transfer impedance (Not measured in this test report)

Data link = 0.5 m

Project no.: BRRNA020 PB 748/01