Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Essentials of Interventional Cancer Pain Management 1st Ed 2019 Edition Ebook PDF
Essentials of Interventional Cancer Pain Management 1st Ed 2019 Edition Ebook PDF
Essentials of Interventional
Cancer Pain Management
123
Contents
ix
x Contents
49 Psychosocial Assessment and Treatment for Patients with Cancer Pain��������������� 451
Laura M. van Veldhoven and Diane M. Novy
50 Relaxation Techniques and Biofeedback for Cancer Pain Management��������������� 463
Asimina Lazaridou and Robert R. Edwards
51 Mood and Anxiety in Cancer Pain ��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 473
R. Garrett Key and William S. Breitbart
52 Acupuncture and Cancer Pain����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 485
Yan Cui Magram and Gary E. Deng
53 Creative Therapies and Mind-Body Health Systems����������������������������������������������� 489
Veena Sankar
54 Botanical Treatments in Cancer Pain Management ����������������������������������������������� 503
Helen M. Blake
55 Integrative Therapies for Pain Modulation ������������������������������������������������������������� 507
Joan Pope and Aron Legler
Index������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 513
Contributors
xiii
xiv Contributors
Jason Chen, DO McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Department of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
Megan Clark, MD University of Kansas, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
Kansas City, KS, USA
Yan Cui Magram, MD New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, Department
of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
Oscar A. de Leon-Casasola, MD The Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,
Department of Anesthesiology, Buffalo, NY, USA
Division of Pain Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
Gary E. Deng, MD, PhD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Integrative
Medicine Service, New York, NY, USA
Nadya M. Dhanani, MD Memorial Hermann Hospital/Mischer Neuroscience Institute,
Department of Pain Management/Neurosurgery, Houston, TX, USA
Kavita V. Dharmarajan, MD, MSc Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York,
NY, USA
Gendai J. Echezona, MD Eagle Consulting Services,White Plains, NY, USA
Maxim S. Eckmann, MD University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA),
UT Medicine Pain Consultants, Department of Anesthesiology, San Antonio, TX, USA
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Department of
Anesthesiology, San Antonio, TX, USA
Robert R. Edwards, PhD Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine,
Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, BWH Pain Management Center,
Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
Rodney J. Ellis, MD University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive
Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH, USA
Mitchell P. Engle, MD, PhD Institute of Precision Pain Medicine, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
Jacob Fehl, MD Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
Joel Frontera, MD McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science
Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA
Jack B. Fu, MD Department of Palliative Care & Rehabilitation Medicine, University of
Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
R. Garrett Key, MD University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
Peter C. Gerszten, MD, MPH, FACS University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case
Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH, USA
Amol J. Ghia, MD University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of
Radiation Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
Arvider Gill, DO The Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of
Anesthesiology, Buffalo, NY, USA
Ramon Go, MD Pain Management, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York,
NY, USA
Karina Gritsenko, MD Montefiore Medical Center – Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
Bronx, NY, USA
Amitabh Gulati, MD, FIPP Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial
Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Contributors xv
Ameet Nagpal, MD, MS, MEd University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
(UTHSCSA), UT Medicine Pain Consultants, Department of Anesthesiology, San Antonio,
TX, USA
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), Department of
Anesthesiology, San Antonio, TX, USA
Sanjeet Narang, MD Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, The
Pain Management Center at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
Diane M. Novy, PhD Department of Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson
Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Daniel Pak, MD Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Parag G. Patil, MD, PhD University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Devin Peck, MD Physician, Austin Interventional Pain, Austin, TX, USA
Mohammad M. Piracha, MD Joan and Sanford I. Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell
University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Division of Pain Management, Department of
Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
Joan Pope, MSN Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, NY, USA
Anussara Prayongrat, MD King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Chulalongkorn
University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bangkok, Thailand
Jeffrey Prinsell Jr., MD Pain Management, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, NY, USA
Vinay Puttanniah, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Anesthesiology and
Critical Care Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Ahmed M. Raslan, MD Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Neurosurgery,
Portland, OR, USA
Portland VA Medical Center, Neurological Surgery, Portland, OR, USA
Shervin Razavian, MD Anesthesia Associates of Kansas City, Overland Park, KS, USA
Shayna E. Rich, MD, PhD, MA Haven Hospice, Gainesville, FL, USA
Erich Richter, MD, FAANS New Orleans Neurosurgical Associates, Marrero, LA, USA
Roy Rivera Jr., PT, PhD, DPT, CHES Crom Rehabilitation, LLC, Department of Outpatient
Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
William S. Rosenberg, MD, FAANS Center for the Relief of Pain, Kansas City, MO, USA
Joshua M. Rosenow, MD Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery,
Neurology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chicago, IL, USA
Lisa Marie Ruppert, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Veena Sankar, MD Austin Anesthesiology Group, Austin, TX, USA
Dawood Sayed, MD University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology
and Pain Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
Rajiv Shah, MD Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
Shalini Shah, MD University of California, Irvine, Department of Anesthesiology and
Perioperative Care, Irvine, CA, USA
Sana Shaikh, MD Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Contributors xvii
As of January 2012, approximately 13.7 million Americans survey and that 42% of patients were experiencing pain
with a history of cancer were alive [1]. It is unclear how despite receiving pharmacological treatment for it [2]. In
many of these individuals were cancer-free and how many the United States, 3,123 ambulatory patients with breast,
had evidence of cancer and may have been undergoing treat- prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer were evaluated for pain
ment. Regardless, the burden of disease is significant; about at their first visit and then 4–5 weeks later. Of those patients,
1,665,540 new cancer cases, not including cancer in situ, are 67% had pain and ongoing pharmacological treatment with
expected to be diagnosed in 2014 [1]. If 30–50% of individu- opioids at the first visit. However, 33% did not have ade-
als with advanced cancer experience significant pain, then quate pain control at that time despite their treatment with
one can understand the high prevalence of pain affecting this opioids [3]. At the follow-up visit, though they continued
population. Moreover, the 5-year relative survival rate for all treatment with opioids, there was no reduction in the num-
cancers diagnosed between 2003 and 2009 is 68%, up from ber of patients experiencing inadequate pain control [3].
49% in 1975–1977 [1]. These numbers explain the high This study also showed that the prevalence of pain due to
number of patients experiencing pain due to their cancer solid tumors has not changed in the United States in more
treatments, including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neu- than 20 years, despite the wide availability and increased
ropathy, postradiation visceral and neuropathic pain, and consumption of opioids [3]. In contrast, a randomized clini-
postsurgical pain syndromes. These survivors have increased cal trial comparing intrathecal therapy (IT) to comprehen-
the need for resources to treat these patients at cancer cen- sive medical management (CMM) in the treatment of
ters, as they have complex pain syndromes that are not man- refractory cancer pain showed that once the patients were
aged by community physicians. enrolled into the study, and then treated by a pain specialist,
Despite advances in the understanding of the neurobiol- there was a further 39% pain reduction in patients allocated
ogy of pain in cancer, the translation of this information to to the CMM group versus a 51% in those receiving IT ther-
multimodal pharmacologic analgesic therapy and the apy [4]. The difference was not statistically significant
advent of new interventional techniques for the manage- illustrating the power of pharmacological therapy in the
ment of cancer pain have not shown a dramatic reduction in hands of pain specialists.
the prevalence of patients experiencing cancer pain. These findings suggest that the involvement of a pain spe-
Recently, a group in the Netherlands reported that 55% of cialist may have a significant impact in the quality of pain
the 1429 respondents with a diagnosis of cancer had expe- control experienced by cancer patients. This difference may
rienced moderate to severe pain in the week prior to the be the result of the implementation of multimodal therapy
with topical analgesics [5], judicious opioid use [6], anticon-
vulsants with modulating capabilities of the voltage-gated
A. Gill calcium channel [7], tricyclic antidepressants [7], and titra-
The Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,
tion to doses associated with therapeutic effects [8]. The
Department of Anesthesiology, Buffalo, NY, USA
importance of adequate pain management in cancer patients
O. A. de Leon-Casasola (*)
needs to be underscored because there is evidence in the
The Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences,
Department of Anesthesiology, Buffalo, NY, USA oncology literature that survival rates are proportionally
related to symptom control and that pain management con-
Division of Pain Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute,
Buffalo, NY, USA tributes to better psychosocial functioning and quality of life
e-mail: Oscar.deleon@roswellpark.org [9]. Because of the interactions of psychosocial issues and
pain, care for these patients is best provided in a multidisci- Cleeland CS. Prospective, observational study of pain and analge-
sic prescribing in medical oncology outpatient with breast, colorec-
plinary environment where psychological support includes tal, lung, or prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1980–91.
emotional support, coping skills training, and cognitive 4. Smith TJ, Staats PS, Deer T, Stearns LJ, Rauck RL, Boortz-Marx RL,
behavioral therapy [10]. Buchser E, Catala E, Bryce DA, Coyne PJ, Pool GE. Randomized
As noted, evaluation of pain is critically important in the clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery sytem compared with
comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain:
oncology patient. Pain intensity must be quantified, and quality impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol.
must be characterized by the patient (whenever possible based 2002;20:4040–9.
on patient communication capacity). The brief pain inventory 5. de Leon-Casasola OA. Multimodal approaches to the management
is an appropriate tool for this purpose [11], while the short of neuropathic pain: the role of topical analgesia. J Pain and Symp
Manag. 2007;33:356–64.
form McGill Pain Questionnaire may be used in cancer patient 6. de Leon-Casasola OA. Current developments in opioid therapy
to evaluate the multidimensionality of pain [12]. A comprehen- for the management of cancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(Suppl
sive pain assessment should be performed if new pain is pres- 10):S3–7.
ent and regularly performed for persisting pain. Moreover, the 7. O’Connor AB, Dworkin RH. Treatment of neuropathic pain: an
overview of recent guidelines. Am J Med. 2009;122:S22–32.
quality of pain must be evaluated to determine if there is a 8. de Leon-Casasola OA. Multimodal, multiclass, multidisciplinary
neuropathic pain component. There are several neuropathic therapy: the key to better analgesia in the 21st century? Clin J Pain.
pain scales that may be implemented for this purpose, includ- 2010;26(Suppl 10):S1–2.
ing the Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) [13] and the Leeds 9. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A. Early palliative care for
patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med.
assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) [14], 2010;363:733–42.
which are easy to use, and may be applied in a short period of 10. Morley S, Eccleston C, Williams A. Systematic review and meta-
time. The patient impression of adequate pain relief and the analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavior
healthcare provider assessment of adequacy of function, and therapy and behavior therapy for chronic pain in adults, excluding
headache. Pain. 1999;80:1–13.
any special issues for the patient relevant to pain treatment, is 11. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief
also necessary to have a complete evaluation of the success of pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23:129–38.
therapy. Because patients with cancer pain will likely need opi- 12. Gauthier LR, Young A, Dworkin RH, Rodin G, Zimmermann
oid therapy, it is also important to evaluate the patient for the C, Warr D, Librach SL, Moore M, Sheperd FA, Riddell RP,
Macpherson A, Melzack R, Gagliese L. Validation of the short-
risk of abuse and diversion. Several tools have been created for form Mc Gill pain questionnaire-1 in younger and older people
this purpose and can be easily implemented [15, 16]. with cancer pain. J Pain. 2014;15:756–70.
Pharmacological pain therapy is very successful in cancer 13. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle
pain [6, 17]. However, invasive techniques are sometimes J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-
Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade
needed because patients cannot tolerate pharmacologic titra- D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with ner-
tion to therapeutic levels or because inadequate analgesia is vous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain
achieved despite maximum doses of these agents. In these diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005;114:29–36.
individuals, there are several options. These include neuro- 14. Bennett M. The LANSS pain scale: the Leeds assessment of neuro-
pathic symptoms and signs. Pain. 2001;92:147–57.
lytic blocks of the sympathetic axis for those patients with a 15. Moore TM, Jones T, Browder JH, Daffron S, Passik SD. A compar-
visceral pain component [18, 19], intrathecal therapy for both ison of common screening methods for predicting aberrant drug-
somatic and neuropathic pain components [20–22], periph- related behavior among patients receiving opioids for chronic pain
eral and spinal cord stimulation [23], and other interventional management. Pain Med. 2009;10:1426–33.
16. Webster LR, Webster RM. Predicting aberrant behaviors in opioid-
procedures performed in the non-cancer population, as non- treated patients: preliminary validation of the opioid risk tool. Pain
cancer-related pain may also occur in this population. Med. 2005;6:432–42.
In summary, the use of pharmacological multimodal ther- 17. de Leon-Casasola OA. Implementing therapy with opioids in can-
apy and interventional procedures may result in successful cer pain. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008;35(6):S1–6.
18. Wong GY, Schroeder DR, Carns PE, Wilson JI, Martin DP, Kinney
pain control in the great majority of patients afflicted by MO, Mantilla CB, Warner DO. Effect of neurolytic celiac plexus
cancer-related pain when implemented by practitioners well block on pain relief, quality of life, and survival in patients with
versed in the use of these alternative therapies. unresectable pancreatic cancer. A randomized controlled trial.
JAMA. 2004;291:1092–9.
19. de Leon-Casasola OA, Kent E, Lema MJ. Neurolytic superior
hypogastric plexus block for chronic pelvic pain associated with
References cancer. Pain. 1993;54:145–51.
20. Lozano J, de Leon-Casasola OA. Indications for intrathecal therapy
1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2014. Atlanta: in cancer patients. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2011;15:147–9.
American Cancer Society; 2014. 21. de Leon-Casasola OA. Implementing and managing intrathecal
2. van den Bueuken-van Everdingen MHJ, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, pumps. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2011;15:155–7.
Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Parjin J. High prevalence of pain in 22. Sparlin J, de Leon-Casasola OA. Intrathecal pump implantation
patients with cancer in a large population-based study in the The techniques. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2011;15:158–61.
Netherlands. Pain. 2007;132:312–20. 23. de Leon-Casasola OA. Spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimu-
3. Fisch MJ, Lee J-W, Weiss M, Wagner LI, Chang VT, Cella V, lation techniques for neuropathic pain. J Pain Symp Manag.
Manola JB, Minasian LM, McCaskill-Stevens W, Mendoza TR, 2009;38:S28–38.
The Practice of Cancer Pain:
A Case Series 2
Sana Shaikh
Localized treatments for pain including directed topical returned with the same presentation and severity. Given the
treatments can often be helpful to treat novel causes of pain. positive response from first procedure, the intercostal nerve
blocks were repeated; however the patient had minimal relief
Case 3: Changing Pain States in Oncologic Patients The from this procedure. Given this response, imaging with an
symptoms of cancer often change over time, and there is a MRI of the thoracolumbar spine was repeated to evaluate for
need for practitioners to have a low threshold for reevalua- extension of disease into the spinal cord. MRI of the spine
tion of the underlying disease process. New symptoms can revealed paraspinal masses abutting exiting nerve roots at the
manifest from treatment or from progression of cancer, either right T7–T8 level. A thoracic epidural was performed with
locally or to distant sites. Diagnostic workup of these possi- significant relief of the patient’s pain. Patient’s pain relief
bilities is important in determining the treatment plan. lasted for 6 weeks with significant progression of the original
Collaboration between interventional pain and other service disease. Due to the rate of disease growth, we planned for
may offer patients a wide variety of options to treat different intrathecal pump placement to treat the neuraxial source of
pain and non-pain symptoms during cancer treatment. the pain.
Ultimately, it is most important to consider a wide array of Though various nerve blocks can make sense clinically
therapies to optimize symptom manage and quality of life. based on the history and physical exam, it is often necessary
to correlate these findings with relevant and up-to-date imag-
Case 3: A 41-year-old male with multifocal peripheral ing in order to optimize efficacy and safety of a planned
schwannoma involving the pleura and liver presents with intervention. It’s important to consider the possibility that an
right-sided chest wall pain. Interventional radiology recom- initial intervention that was helpful may not be possible
mended cryoablation of this lesion on the anterior aspect of given changes in anatomy related to progression of disease.
the seventh rib. The patient was also referred for consultation It is crucial to always reassess patients given the aggressive
with the pain service for possible interventional options for nature of some of the baseline etiologies.
pain relief.
On initial assessment, patient noted pain as a sharp, tin- Case 4 and 5: Considerations for Intrathecal Drug
gling, and burning in the right upper quadrant of the abdo- Delivery in the Oncologic Population The goal of inter-
men. Despite the use of opioids, the patient found the pain to ventional pain physician is to consider intervening in some-
cause significant daily disability. Upon physical exam, there one’s pain outcome as early as possible to treat a patient’s
was tenderness to palpation across the right seventh and pain and improve their quality of life and function. The intra-
eighth rib in an anterolateral location This correlated with a thecal delivery of opioids and other adjuvant medications is
seventh rib schwannoma (Fig. 2.3). A right-sided intercostal an effective way to treat refractory cancer pain while mini-
nerve block of the seventh and eighth ribs under ultrasound mizing systemic side effects and allowing for a greater abil-
guidance was performed. ity to address increased pain medication requirements. A
The patient’s noted significant improvement from base- randomized clinical trial of implantable drug systems showed
line and that relief lasted for 11 weeks. At that time, pain better clinical pain relief, less systemic side effects, and a
tendency toward increased survival in the treatment of can-
cer pain [8].
References
Fig. 2.5 CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis shows necrotic left pel-
vic mass centered at the left iliopsoas muscle and extending into the 1. NIH: National Cancer Institute. Cancer statistics. https://www.can-
peritoneum (arrows) cer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics
2. Van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG,
et al. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review
file from decrease in systemic opioid treatment. An intrathe- of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(9):1437–49.
3. American Pain Society (APS). Principles of analgesic use in the
cal pump was placed without any side effects or complications, treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. 6th ed. Glenview: American
and the patient returned for subsequent outpatient visits and Pain Society; 2008.
for adjustment of dose over the next few months. Ultimately 4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guide-
the cancer progressed, and various combinations and doses lines in oncology for adult cancer pain. V. 1.2010. Fort Washington:
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2010. Available at:
of intrathecal medications were titrated to alleviate the pain. www.nccn.org. Accessed 1 Nov 2010.
A retrospective case study of 46 cancer patients who had 5. Van Lancker A, Velghe A, Van Hecke A, Verbrugghe M, Van Den
an epidural trial discussed how to use a patient’s pre-pump Noortgate N, Grypdonck M, Verhaeghe S, Bekkering G, Beeckman
systemic opioid requirements to calculate an appropriate D. Prevalence of symptoms in older cancer patients receiv-
ing palliative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain
intrathecal dose without having to do an epidural trial [8]. Symptom Manag. 2014;47(1):90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
There are several ways to trial a patient for neuraxial directed jpainsymman.2013.02.016.
drug delivery, but epidural trial can be a reasonable option 6. Borgsteede SD, et al. Symptoms in patients receiving palliative
for patients who are in the hospital. care: a study on patient-physician encounters in general practice.
Palliat Med. 2007;21:417–23.
7. Higginson IJ, Evans CJ. What is the evidence that palliative
care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their fami-
Conclusion lies? Cancer J. 2010;16(5):423–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/
PPO.0b013e3181f684e5.
8. Malhotra VT, Root J, Kesselbrenner J, Njoku I, Cubert K, Gulati A,
This chapter highlights several different cases that can repre- Puttanniah V, Bilsky M, Kaplitt M. Intrathecal pain pump infusions
sent challenges to interventional pain physicians when treat- for intractable cancer pain: an algorithm for dosing without a neur-
ing cancer patients. It is crucial to continuously challenge axial trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;116(6):1364–70.
Part II
Cancer Pain Syndromes
Pathophysiology of Cancer Pain
3
Stephen Lawrence Thorp
S. L. Thorp (*)
Pain Medicine, Northwell Health Phelps Hospital,
Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA
e-mail: sthorp@northwell.edu
Etiologies of Neuropathic Pain tral rami of the L1–L4 spinal nerves, with variable contribu-
tions from the T12 and L5 spinal nerves. The plexus lies in
Accordingly, tumor location in close proximity to neural the psoas compartment located between the quadratus lum-
structures can lead to neurological impairment and neuro- borum and psoas muscles and is composed of dorsal and
pathic pain. Neoplastic plexopathy represents a severe and dif- ventral divisions. The main branches of the lumbar plexus
ficult to treat form of cancer pain. Neoplastic plexopathy arises include the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous
when a tumor progresses to involve one of the main plexuses; nerves as well as the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and geni-
the cervical, brachial, or lumbosacral plexus. Treatment for tofemoral nerves. The sacral plexus arises from S1–S3 giv-
tumor-induced plexopathies may involve surgical or radiation ing rise to the sciatic nerve posteriorly, which then forms the
therapy, in addition to neuropathic pain medications. common peroneal and tibial nerves, as well as the pudendal
The cervical plexus contains contributions from the C1, nerve which provides sensation to the perineal area.
C2, C3, and C4 spinal nerves and provides innervation for The most common tumors invading this plexus are
the muscles of the neck as well as the prevertebral muscles. colorectal, sarcomas, and genito-ureteral tumors, with the
Impingement upon this plexus by tumor can result in cervi- sacral plexus being involved more commonly than the lum-
cal plexopathy, which typically presents with pain in the bar plexus. When the lumbar plexus is involved, the most
neck, shoulder, or throat. Weakness in the shoulder is related common presenting symptom is leg pain, followed by numb-
to weakness in the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid mus- ness and weakness [11]. As the plexus lies in the psoas com-
cles, which are innervated by the spinal accessory nerve. The partment, tumors affecting the psoas muscle can cause
patient may also have shortness of breath, particularly if significant pain, termed malignant psoas syndrome [12].
there is underlying pulmonary pathology, due to involvement When the sacral plexus is involved, the clinical picture can
of the phrenic nerve and hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. present with pain down the posterior aspect of the leg and
Cervical plexopathy is most commonly associated with head weakness in the foot, similar to an S1 radiculopathy. The
and neck tumors and lymphomas but may also be due to lung patient may also present with perineal pain and incontinence
and breast cancers [10]. The cervical plexus can be blocked in later stages. Diagnosis of neoplastic plexopathy is con-
superficially resulting in cutaneous analgesia, or by anesthe- firmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron
tizing the C2, C3, and C4 spinal nerves as they exit their emission tomography (PET) to identify areas of active neo-
respective cervical foramina, or the deep cervical plexus. plasm in or abutting the plexus. Electromyography (EMG)
Far more common than tumors impacting the cervical can be used to further elucidate which nerves are most
plexus are tumors compressing the brachial plexus. The bra- affected and guide treatment.
chial plexus is composed of the ventral rami of C5–T1 in
most individuals, with occasional contributions from C4 and
T2 spinal nerves. The nerve roots exit the foramina and travel ther Associated Pathophysiology
O
anterolateral between the anterior and middle scalene mus- for Anatomic Cancer-Related Pain
cles, where they combine to form superior, middle, and inte-
rior trunks. At approximately the level of the first rib, these While pain related to tumor in the bone and nervous system
trunks again divide into an anterior and posterior division, structures is the most common cause of anatomical pain,
which then form the lateral, medial, and posterior cords, so- other anatomical locations may generate pain as well.
named for their relation to the axillary artery. The three cords Tumors in the brain are well known to cause headaches, as
then divide into the peripheral nerves which supply innerva- are metastasis to the spinal meninges [13]. Distension of
tion to the upper extremities. capsular organs is another well-known cause of tumor-
Brachial plexopathy is most commonly associated with related pain as occurs when liver tumors distend Glisson’s
lung and breast cancer. Superior sulcus, or Pancoast, tumors capsule causing abdominal pain [14]. In all of these exam-
are located at the apex of the lung and may impinge upon the ples, the primary treatment of cancer pain is treatment of the
brachial plexus. The clinical presentation of the plexopathy is cancer and any therapies that remove or reduce the size of the
related to where the plexus is impacted. The most commonly tumor.
affected portion of the brachial plexus is the lower roots, and
patients often present with radicular pain and radiculopathies
in an ulnar nerve distribution. When head and neck neoplasms Chemical Mediators of Pain
impact the brachial plexus, they typically affect the upper cer-
vical roots and superior trunk, causing pain more commonly The tumor microenvironment (TME) is composed of tumor
in a median or radial nerve distribution. cells and stromal cells and has a substantial role in tumor
The lumbar and sacral plexus provide innervation to the progression and cancer-mediated pain [15]. Tumor and stro-
lower extremity. The lumbar plexus is comprised of the ven- mal cells communicate with each other, their microenviron-
3 Pathophysiology of Cancer Pain 15
ment, as well as the tissue they are invading by secreting In addition to inflammatory cytokines inducing inflamma-
multiple noxious chemical factors, inflammatory mediators, tion and sensitization of peripheral nociceptors, cytokines
and immunomodulators. These stimuli are transduced at may also be involved in noninflammatory pain. TGF-β is a
peripheral nociceptors and transmitted via an action poten- cytokine that has been implicated in regulating osteoclasts
tial to the spinal cord and travel via ascending tracts to the and mediating bone resorption, as occurs with metastasis to
supraspinal processing centers. While this likely plays a role bone. TGF-β is released by chondrocytes during bone injury
in all cancers, the details of a few specific examples have and may mediate the production of nerve growth factor
been elucidated. (NGF) in chondrocytes as well [19]. Further, TGF-β has been
shown to be inhibited by proinflammatory cytokines and, as
such, may be a noninflammatory mediator of pain in meta-
athophysiology of Pain in Patients
P static bone pain. The stimulation of osteoclastogenesis may
with Multiple Myeloma also lead to the release of growth factors and other mediators
that may cause the growth of the invading tumor cells.
Multiple myeloma is a malignant cancer of plasma cells that
results in a unique pain syndrome referred to as myeloma
bone disease. Bone pain is the most common symptom Novel Therapies for Cancer-Related Pain
reported at presentation, in more than two-thirds of patients,
and 80–90% of patients with multiple myeloma will develop The treatment of cancer pain is multifaceted and discussed
bone lesions during their disease [16]. The etiology of this throughout this text. The most important treatment of cancer
bone pain is likely dysregulation in bone remodeling. Normal pain is treatment of the cancer itself. Treatments in the form
bone remodeling is a continuous process of old bone resorp- of surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, interventional
tion stimulated by osteoclasts and new bone formation treatments, and medication management are at the forefront
through collagen synthesis and mineralization by osteo- of treatment. These treatments may be the cause of, or con-
blasts. When multiple myeloma metastasizes to the bone, it tribute to, the patient’s pain as well, as with chronic postsurgi-
induces bone resorption by activating osteoclasts. The cal pain, radiation-induced neuritis, or chemotherapy-induced
myeloma cells release and stimulate cells in the bone mar- peripheral neuropathy, to name a few examples. In recent
row microenvironment to release osteoclastogenic activating years there has been increased interest in treatments that tar-
factors such as RANKL, MIP-1α, TNF-α, interleukin 3 (IL- get the pathophysiology of the cancer. These same molecular
3), and IL-6 [17]. In addition to the stimulation of osteoclast targets are also potential targets for the treatment of pain, as
formation and activity, many of these factors are also these therapies that target the cytokine and inflammatory
involved in the inhibition of osteoblastic activity as well as amediators released by tumors and inhibit tumor growth also
supportive role for myeloma cells themselves. decrease tumor-related pain.
Bone-related pain and the molecular causes of the pain
are now being targeted as pain therapies. One such molecule
Pathophysiology of Cancer Pain in Patients is Src, a protein tyrosine kinase non-receptor that is associ-
with Breast Cancer ated with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor com-
plex. Found in neurons, Src has been shown to be associated
Breast cancer, in addition to causing pain with metastasis to with pain and maintaining inflammatory hyperalgesia [20].
sites such as the bone and compressing neural structures as Further, Src has a vital role in osteoclast activity. By target-
discussed previously, causes pain through the release of ing this molecule involved in bone resorption, there is poten-
chemical mediators as well. The tumor and stromal cells tial to decrease the breakdown of bone and thus one aspect of
release and induce host release of numerous mediators of the bone pain itself. Bisphosphates are another well-known
pain. The amount and content of circulating cytokines have treatment that inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption
been shown to be not only distinct to subtype of breast can- by reducing osteoclast activity [21]. While effective in reduc-
cer but potentially to the amount of pain suffered by patients ing osteoclastic activity, bisphosphonates do not impact
as well. Luminal type A and B breast cancers exhibit higher osteoblastic activity and have numerous potential side effects
levels of TGF-β1 and TNF-α than healthy controls, and TGF- including renal impairment and osteonecrosis of the jaw.
β1 levels are higher in HER2-amplified tumors than luminal Further, bisphosphonates have been shown to inhibit the
types [18]. In contradistinction, triple-negative tumors have ability of the metastasis to interact with the osteoblasts and
lower circulating levels of TGF-β1 when compared with inhibit their secretion of chemokine CCL2 [22].
other subtypes and healthy volunteers. While the different The treatment of myeloma bone disease is multifaceted
cytokine profiles of tumors are currently under investigation, and involves mediation management, radiation therapy, che-
the direct relationship with pain is still being elucidated. motherapy, vertebral augmentation, and surgery. The under-
16 S. L. Thorp
Table 3.1 Potential targets for the treatment of myeloma bone References
disease
Osteoclast mediators Osteoblast mediators 1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions
OPG WIF-1 of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Seattle:
RANK SFRPs IASP; 1994. Print.
MIP-1 alpha Dkk 2. Van Den Beuken-Van Everdingen MHJ, Hochstenbach LMJ,
Joosten BEAJ, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Janssen DJA. Update on preva-
VEGF Runx2
lence of pain in patients with Cancer: systematic review and meta-
SDF-1 alpha TGF-beta
analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2016;51(6):1070–90. n. pag.
OPG osteoprotegerin, RANK receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa- Web.
B, MIP-1 alpha macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha, VEGF vas- 3. Koizumi M, Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Iwase T, Ogata E. Post-
cular endothelial growth factor, SDF-1 alpha stromal-derived factor-1 operative breast Cancer patients diagnosed with skeletal metastasis
alpha, WIF-1 wnt inhibitory factor-1, SFRPs secreted frizzled-related without bone pain had fewer skeletal-related events and deaths than
proteins, Dkk Dickkorf family of secreted proteins, Runx2 runt-related those with bone pain. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):423. Web.
transcription factor 2, TGF-beta transforming growth factor-beta 4. Fletcher CDM. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and
bone. Lyon: IARC; 2013. Print.
5. Nencini S, Ivanusic JJ. The physiology of bone pain. How much do
lying pathophysiology discussed previously has also become we really know? Front Physiol Front Physiol. 2016;7:157. n. pag.
Web.
a target for therapy. Bisphosphonates, discussed previously, 6. Mach DB, Rogers SD, Sabino MC, Luger NM, Schwei MJ,
are a mainstay of therapy for multiple myeloma. In addition Pomonis JD, Keyser CP, Clohisy DR, Adams DJ, O’Leary P,
to bisphosphonates, a number of mediators known to be Mantyh PW. Origins of skeletal pain: sensory and sympathetic
involved in the pathogenesis of myeloma bone pain are cur- innervation of the mouse femur. Neuroscience. 2002;113(1):155–
66. Web.
rently being investigated as potential therapeutic targets, and 7. Jimenez-Andrade JM, Mantyh WG, Bloom AP, Haili X, Ferng AS,
there is tremendous potential for such agents (Table 3.1). Dussor G, Vanderah TW, Mantyh PW. A phenotypically restricted
One such agent, bortezomib, is a proteasome inhibitor that set of primary afferent nerve fibers innervate the bone versus
has been found to improve the survival of patients with mul- skin: therapeutic opportunity for treating skeletal pain. Bone.
2010;46(2):306–13. Web.
tiple myeloma [23]. 8. Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamashita M, Ishikawa T, Ito T, Shigemura
Pain related to breast cancer may be related to many of the T, Nishiyama H, Konno S, Ohta H, Takaso M, Inoue G, Eguchi
topics discussed previously, including compression of neural Y, Ochiai N, Kishida S, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Arai G, Miyagi
structures and metastasis to bone. As in the treatment of M, Kamoda H, Suzkuki M, Nakamura J, Furuya T, Kubota G,
Sakuma Y, Oikawa Y, Suzuki M, Sasho T, Nakagawa K, Toyone
myeloma bone pain, there are many potential novel therapies T, Takahashi K. Existence of a neuropathic pain component in
being investigated that may be used to not only treat the cancer patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Yonsei Med J Yonsei Med J.
but the pain it causes as well. It has been shown that altered 2012;53(4):801. Web.
glutamatergic signaling can disrupt the normal cycle of bone 9. Arrington SA, Schoonmaker JE, Damron TA, Mann KA, Allen
MJ. Temporal changes in bone mass and mechanical properties in a
remodeling and cause significant pain [24]. Utilizing inhibi- murine model of tumor osteolysis. Bone. 2006;38(3):359–67. Web.
tors of glutamate release from the cancer cells is one such 10. Jaeckle K. Neurologic manifestations of neoplastic and radiation-
novel therapeutic approach. Sulfasalazine is an inhibitor of induced Plexopathies. Semin Neurol. 2010;30(03):254–62. Web.
glutamate release that has been shown to reduce nociceptive 11. Jaeckle KA, Young DF, Foley KM. The natural history of lumbosa-
cral plexopathy in cancer. Neurology. 1985;35(1):8. Web.
behavior in a mouse model of breast cancer bone pain [25]. 12. Stevens MJ, Atkinson C, Broadbent AM. The malignant psoas syn-
The continued investigation of further treatments related to the drome revisited: case report, mechanisms, and current therapeutic
pathophysiology of breast cancer pain will continue to change options. J Palliat Med. 2010;13(2):211–6. Web.
the management of the cancer itself and the pain it causes. 13. Fizazi K, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A, Jouve M, Dieras
V, Palangie T, Beuzeboc P, Dorval T, Pouillart P. Meningeal
Carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma: clinical features,
prognostic factors, and results of a high-dose intrathecal methotrex-
Conclusion ate regimen. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1315–23. Web.
14. Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Fonouni H, Schemmer P, Schmied
BM, Hallscheidt P, Schirmacher P, Weitz J, Friess H, Buchler
Cancer pain is difficult to treat and a terrible malady for MW, Schmidt J. Primary malignant hepatic epithelioid
those suffering from cancer. Traditional therapies continue to Hemangioendothelioma. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2108–21. Web.
be the standard of care and involve medication management, 15. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor pro-
radiation therapy, chemotherapy, vertebral augmentation, gression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–37. Web.
16. Hameed JB, Dowling P, Clynes M, O’Gorman P. Bone disease
and surgery, among other therapies. New studies that eluci- in multiple myeloma: pathophysiology and management. CGM
date the pathophysiology of individual cancers open the door Cancer Growth Metastasis. 2014;7:33. Web.
for novel therapies that may target the cancers as never done 17. Edwards CM, Zhuang J, Mundy GR. The pathogenesis of the bone
before. As new therapies evolve, the treatment of cancer- disease of multiple myeloma. Bone. 2008;42(6):1007–13. Web.
18. Panis C, Pavanelli WR. Cytokines as mediators of pain-related pro-
related pain will evolve as well, ushering in a new paradigm cess in breast cancer. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:1–6. Web.
of treatment for our patients.
3 Pathophysiology of Cancer Pain 17
19. Davidson ENB, Van Caam APM, Vitters EL, Bennink MB, and affect their interactions with breast Cancer cells. Breast Cancer
Thijssen E, Van Den Berg WB, Koenders MI, Van Lent PLEM, Res Treat. 2013;140(1):35–48. Web.
Van De Loo FAJ, Van Der Kraan PM. TGF-β is a potent inducer 23. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR,
of nerve growth factor in articular cartilage via the ALK5-Smad2/3 Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp
pathway. Potential role in OA related pain? Osteoarthr Cartil. PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Improved survival in multiple myeloma
2015;23(3):478–86. Web. and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2007;111(5):2516–20.
20. De Felice M, Lambert D, Holen I, Escott KJ, Andrew D. Effects Web.
of Src-kinase inhibition in cancer-induced bone pain. Mol Pain. 24. Fazzari J, Lin H, Murphy C, Ungard R, Singh G. Inhibitors of glu-
2016;12(0): n. pag. Web. tamate release from breast Cancer cells; new targets for Cancer-
21. Rodan GA, Fleisch HA. Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. J induced bone-pain. Sci Rep Sci Rep. 2015;5:8380. Web.
Clin Invest. 1996;97(12):2692–6. Web. 25. Ungard RG, Seidlitz EP, Singh G. Inhibition of breast Cancer-cell
22. Kaiser T, Teufel I, Geiger K, Vater Y, Aicher WK, Klein G, Fehm glutamate release with sulfasalazine limits Cancer-induced bone
T. Bisphosphonates modulate vital functions of human osteoblasts pain. Pain. 2014;155(1):28–36. Web.
Chemotherapy
4
Karina Gritsenko and Michael Lubrano
Introduction affect all phases of the cell cycle, with the majority focusing
on S phase (antimetabolites) or M phase (taxanes and vinca
In this chapter, the most common chemotherapeutic agents, alkaloids) [2–5]. A summary of antineoplastic agents, by
a number of their uses, and most of their relevant side effects class, is included in Table 4.1.
are addressed. For some compounds, their uses may extend
further than just neoplastic therapies as a number of inflam-
matory diseases benefit from immune modulation. For the Alkylating Agents
purposes of our review, only antineoplastic uses and their
adverse effects will be mentioned. Alkylating agents are a large and diverse class of agents that
actively cross-link DNA strands in order to reduce the syn-
thesis of DNA during all steps of the cell cycle. Subcategories
Chemotherapeutic Classes include alkyl sulfonates, bioreductives, nitrogen mustards,
nitrosoureas, and triazenes. Alkyl sulfonate (busulfan) pri-
Chemotherapeutic agents are subdivided into major classes marily interacts with guanosine at the N-7 position in order
and then subcategories. Therapies are grouped according to to disrupt RNA transcription and the replication of DNA. It
which component of the cell cycle they impair and the mech- is especially effective in hematologic cells with considerable
anism by which this occurs. Tumor cells are rapidly growing, efficacy on myeloid cells compared to lymphoid cells. Alkyl
and dividing entities thus are more susceptible to interven- bioreductives (mitomycin C) are most active during late-G1
tions that impair cellular division, triggering a cascade and early-S phases of the cell cycle. It is converted to an
toward cell destruction. The cycle for somatoform non- alkylating metabolite and functions as such by cross-linking
gamete developing cells begins with G1 phase. The cell pre- nucleotides, primarily guanine and cytosine, thus disrupting
pares for division by expressing RNA and proteins which cell activity. DNA and RNA syntheses are also impaired.
allow the cell to grow in anticipation of future cell division. Reduced environments, such as hypoxic tumor cells, increase
The next phase, S, allows for DNA replication. G2 phase the effectiveness of this agent. Nitrogen mustards (cyclo-
subsequently occurs with a number of checkpoints to assure phosphamide, mechlorethamine, melphalan, chlorambucil)
the cell is ready to appropriately divide. The final phase is M include a myriad of agents that are effective in cross-linking
phase, which occurs directly before cell division, with its DNA strands to impair DNA synthesis. As such, they are
hallmark mitotic spindle that develops down the center of a active during all phases of the cell cycle. Nitrosoureas (car-
cell prior to division, aligning and separating chromosomes mustine, lomustine, semustine, streptozocin) also cross-link
to opposite, cellular poles [1]. Chemotherapeutic agents may DNA and RNA strands but may have a secondary function of
modifying and disrupting proteins as well. Given their lipid-
soluble nature, nitrosoureas are able to cross the blood-brain
K. Gritsenko (*)
barrier in order to treat tumors of the central nervous
Montefiore Medical Center – Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
Bronx, NY, USA system.
Busulfan is an alkylating agent used in chronic myeloge-
M. Lubrano
Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of nous leukemia with up to 90% remission. Seizures have been
California San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center, reported in patients who are predisposed to them, and pro-
San Francisco, CA, USA phylactic anticonvulsants may be administered prior to
e-mail: Michael.Lubrano@ucsf.edu
therapy initiation in cases where high doses may be antici- diotoxicity. Pneumonitis is rare and can be reversed with
pated. Pulmonary fibrosis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia early discontinuation within the first several months of use.
can occur with an average of 4 years after treatment in up to Pleural thickening is associated with late-onset pneumonitis
4% of patients. Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome which may become a chronic, progressive condition [7].
may occur and is associated with high concentrations as a Interstitial cystitis and bladder cancer are additional con-
result of rapid infusion. This risk is increased with doses over cerns, as acrolein (a toxic metabolite of cyclophosphamide)
16 mg/kg based on ideal body weight. With pulmonary may accumulate in the bladder, thus predisposing transi-
symptoms, it is important to rule out opportunistic infections tional bladder cells to oncogenicity. In order to avoid these
as well as leukemic infiltrates before diagnosing busulfan toxic side effects, clinicians should consider pulse doses as
toxicity. This may require biopsy of the lung. If toxicity is well as giving 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate, a compound that
diagnosed, busulfan should be discontinued immediately. conjugates acrolein in the urine. Patients should also be
Mitomycin C is an alkylating agent effective against a advised to drink fluids to maintain adequate hydration. Of
number of GI adenocarcinomas. It can be used alongside note, some individuals with a G516 T variant of CYP2B6
5-fluorouracil for squamous cell cancer of the anus. As a metabolize cyclophosphamide much more rapidly and there-
vesicular infusion, it may also be used to topically treat blad- fore may require lower doses in order to avoid the toxic
der cancer. Bladder fibrosis is a common side effect. Patient effects of this agent.
may also experience pulmonary toxicity and hemolytic ure- Carmustine is similar to other nitrosoureas as it cross-
mic syndrome. links DNA and RNA strands. It may also carbamylate amino
Cyclophosphamide is a nitrogen mustard most frequently acids which modify proteins. This agent is lipid soluble, thus
utilized clinically in a large number of oncologic and inflam- allowing it to cross the blood-brain barrier in order to combat
matory settings, including hematologic, adrenal, and lung malignancies in the central nervous system (including astro-
cancers. Hepatocytes metabolize cyclophosphamide to aldo- cytomas, ependymomas, glioblastomas, and medulloblasto-
phosphamide, which is further converted into toxic com- mas). Cumulative doses greater than 1400 mg/m2 place
pounds by cells throughout the body, including target tumor patient at risk for delayed-onset pulmonary fibrosis typically
cells. These toxic compounds thus function as alkylating in those who have had prolonged treatment.
agents. High doses of cyclophosphamide may cause cardio- Streptozocin is a nitrosourea that functions similarly to
toxicity by damaging endothelial capillaries. This can lead to carmustine by cross-linking DNA, modifying proteins, and
pericarditis or pericardial effusions and may eventually crossing the blood-brain barrier. It is typically used to treat
develop into a cardiac tamponade [6]. ACE inhibitors, ino- metastatic islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas and metastatic
tropes, beta-blockers, and diuretics can help to manage car- adrenal carcinomas. Patients experience less bone marrow
22 K. Gritsenko and M. Lubrano
suppression for this agent than for carmustine, although it metabolite that allows for its elimination. Tumor lysis syn-
has been associated with psychiatric side effects such as drome is another severe side effect that may lead to acute
depression and confusion. kidney injury and/or failure, especially when tumor burden
Dacarbazine is a triazene that is activated by the cyto- is high.
chrome P450 system by conversion to methyl-triazene-1-l- Pemetrexed functions similarly to methotrexate but also
imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC). As MTIC, it functions by inhibits thymidylate synthase and two other enzymes that
methylating the O6 and N6 positions of guanine in DNA. This play roles in the reduction of folate. Its uses include treating
subsequently causes breaks in the DNA double strand and pleural mesothelioma and thymus cancer. Bone marrow sup-
eventual triggers apoptosis. It may be used for treating mela- pression and interstitial pneumonitis are concerning adverse
noma and adrenal malignancies. Extravasation is a serious effects; however, hepatic toxicity is especially concerning
consequence that results in extreme pain and tissue damage. with pemetrexed with several case reports identifying this as
Temozolomide: This prodrug is converted to MTIC non- a cause of mortality. Folate and vitamin B12 are essential for
enzymatically through a spontaneous and rapid process in reducing bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity.
bodily tissues after redistributing. It functions similar to
dacarbazine as a triazene. Typically, this agent is reserved for
refractory astrocytoma and a number of additional, off-label Nucleotide and Platinum Analogs
uses in the central nervous system tumors. Radiotherapy in
conjunction with this agent increases risk for Pneumocystis Nucleotide analogs are broken down into two subgroups.
jirovecii pneumonia, thus warranting prophylactic antibiot- Purine analogs (mercaptopurine, thioguanine, hydroxyurea)
ics in select patient populations. mimic adenosine and guanine. They typically deceive intra-
cellular machinery in order to be inappropriately placed into
DNA. Once present, DNA replication is impaired, and tumor
Folates cells are unable to undergo S phase and replicate. This trig-
gers a number of mechanisms that lead to apoptosis.
Folates participate in a disruption of the folate cycle (metho- Pyrimidine analogs (fluorouracil, capecitabine, cytaragine,
trexate, pemetrexed). These agents irreversibly inhibit dihy- gemcitabine) either mimic cytosine, thymine, and uracil or
drofolate reductase (DHFR), an enzyme that donates methyl entirely block pyrimidine synthesis within cells. These
groups to folate, thus impairing an essential step for intracel- agents commonly are administered as prodrugs that require
lular production of purines and thymidylic acid. DNA, RNA, activation by either hepatic cells or cellular machinery within
and various proteins require this in order to function. While the tumor of interest.
folates may also be used in inflammatory diseases, the mech- Platinum analogs (carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin)
anism of action is unknown. effectively treat malignancies by interacting with tumors in a
Methotrexate is a folate that is especially useful in treat- number of ways. They actively bind the DNA of target cells
ing solid tumors found in a myriad of organ systems. It is and form intra-strand and inter-strand DNA covalent cross-
often the agent of choice for trophoblastic neoplasms and links. These cross-links inhibit DNA synthesis and denature
may be given as a sole agent for hydatidiform moles or ecto- the double helix.
pic pregnancies of small enough sizes. The hepatotoxic side Mercaptopurine is a purine analog converted by
effects of methotrexate are related to a cumulative dose of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT)
greater than 1.5 grams. Hepatic biopsies are recommended into monophosphate and triphosphate forms. The mono-
in patients with prolonged exposure. Other hepatotoxic risk phosphate form inhibits purine synthesis. The triphosphate
factors include ethanol consumption, diabetes, hyperlipid- form is falsely incorporated into DNA and RNA by cellular
emia, family history of liver disease, and obesity. machinery to inhibit replication. Xanthine oxidase (XO) is
Methotrexate elimination is renal based, with greater than the enzyme that metabolizes its active forms, as well as
50% not metabolized. Neurotoxicity includes seizures that purines themselves. By co-administering allopurinol, a XO
occur predominantly in children who are being treated for inhibitor, the dose of mercaptopurine can be reduced by
ALL, as well as encephalopathy from high doses or concur- 50–70%. Mercaptopurine is mainly used for hematologic
rent radiation. Intrathecal administration raises concerns for cancers and thus has a number of side effects involving the
arachnoiditis, chronic leukoencephalopathy, and myelopa- manipulation of hematologic cell lines. This includes bone
thy. Administering leucovorin (5-formyltetrahydrofolate) marrow suppression, immunosuppression, and subsequent
may reduce the toxicity of methotrexate and spares non- secondary malignancies. Hepatotoxicity occurs at any dose,
tumor cells. Another treatment modality for overexposure but increased risk occurs above 2.5 mg/kg/day.
includes glucarpidase, an enzyme that rapidly hydrolyzes Discontinuation may resolve hepatic symptoms after about
methotrexate in the extracellular space into an inactive 1–2 months. Secondary malignancies are a major concern,
4 Chemotherapy 23
especially hepatosplenic T-cell lymphomas (HSTCL) which cardiac myopathy, and sudden death have all occurred in
are a rare and frequently fatal cancer. patients receiving capecitabine.
Thioguanine is a purine analog closely related to mercap- Cytarabine, a pyrimidine analog, utilizes cellular trans-
topurine and has a similar function and metabolism. Its pri- porters to enter tumors prior to being converted to aracyti-
mary use is for adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Side dine triphosphate. In this phosphorylated form, it may be
effects parallel those of mercaptopurine with concern for placed into DNA. Unlike other analogs, cytarabine functions
tumor lysis syndrome. Some patients have genetic polymor- by directly inhibiting DNA polymerase, both alpha and beta,
phism that results in a deficiency of thiopurine methyltrans- thus impairing DNA replication and repair, primarily useful
ferase (TPMT). Medications that are salicylic acid derivatives to treat hematologic malignancies. In addition to acute pan-
are able to inhibit TPMT and may lead to significant myelo- creatitis and tumor lysis syndrome, a hypersensitivity reac-
suppression while taking this agent for some patients. This tion with acute cardiopulmonary arrest is a rare side effect.
would require considerable dose reduction to avoid serious Sudden respiratory arrest syndrome is also a subsequent con-
toxicity. cern that may take up to 12 h to precipitate following treat-
Hydroxyurea is another purine analog that disrupts DNA ment. This involves malaise, maculopapular rash, fever,
synthesis by inhibiting ribonucleoside-diphosphate reduc- myalgia, bone pain, and chest pain and requires immediate
tase. This blocks the development of deoxyribonucleotides administration of corticosteroids to manage. Patients receiv-
from ribonucleotides, thus freezing target cells in the G1 ing doses that exceed 1.5 g/m2 may experience
phase. It is effective in leukemias, melanoma, and squamous conjunctivitis.
cancers. In addition to tumor lysis syndrome, concerning Gemcitabine is also a pyrimidine analog that functions
adverse effects include bone marrow suppression, megalo- similarly to cytarabine. It is metabolized to gemcitabine
blastic erythropoiesis, vascular ulceration, and gangrene. diphosphate and works to inhibit ribonucleotide reductase
Erythrocyte abnormalities may erupt displaying megaloblas- and DNA synthesis. Its triphosphate form is effective in
tic erythropoiesis that is typically self-limiting. Hydroxyurea incorporating itself into DNA directly to inhibit DNA poly-
has also been associated with the development of skin cancer merase. This agent is used to treat metastatic breast cancer
with long-term use. and solid and hematopoietic tumors from a number of organ
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a pyrimidine analog requiring systems. Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) and hemolytic ure-
activation in order to inhibit thymidylate synthase. This mic syndrome (HUS) are serious, adverse events.
enzyme is necessary for generating thymidine triphosphate, Gemcitabine should be discontinued if CLS precipitates.
an essential factor for synthesizing DNA. A second metabo- HUS may result in considerable morbidity and mortality.
lite of 5-FU is generated that may be inappropriately incor- Any patient on this agent must therefore have an established
porated in RNA and effectively disrupt translation. This is a renal baseline that is continuously monitored. Adult respira-
very useful agent to treat solid tumors found throughout mul- tory distress syndrome and pneumonitis and fibrosis are
tiple organ systems. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia other observed effects although symptoms may not precipi-
(hand-foot) syndrome is a side effect that 5-FU may precipi- tate for 2 weeks after a patient’s gemcitabine dose.
tate that involves tingling in the hands and feet. It has the Cisplatin is a platinum analog that exists in two isomer
potential for developing into pain associated with erythema. forms, with the cis form actively functioning at 14 times the
The resolution typically occurs within a week of discontinu- cytotoxic level as its trans-isomer counterpart. Both isomers
ing 5-FU. Toxicity can also occur in the 5% of patients who function similarly, but cellular mechanisms are less capable
are deficient in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), of recognizing and repairing the cis-isomer form. It is effec-
the enzyme responsible for metabolizing 5-FU. Without tive in eradicating a number of tumor cells, most notably
DPD, 5-FU toxicity can cause neutropenia, diarrhea, and solid tumors. Adverse effects are also numerous and consid-
neurotoxicity. Overdose of 5-FU may be treated with uridine erable – perhaps the most notable including ototoxicity and
triacetate if administered within 4 days, with multiple, small renal toxicity. Neurotoxicity is an additional concern for all
cohort studies showing full recovery in all patients who platinum agents. Hyperuricemia may also occur with cispla-
received this rescue agent [8, 9]. tin due to tumor lysis. Neuropathies that are severe and
Capecitabine is another pyrimidine analog (prodrug) that potentially irreversible can occur when administration is too
must be hydrolyzed by the liver as well as other bodily tis- frequent or recommended doses are exceeded. A number of
sues to become 5-FU. Its uses are therefore similar to 5-FU, neurologic sequelae have been described, including posterior
but it is capable of oral administration. Its side effect profile reversible leukoencephalopathy syndrome (PRES), seizures,
is similar; although bone marrow suppression is significant, and loss of taste or motor function. Children with thiopurine
patients with platelets less than 100,000 or neutrophils less S-methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphisms are more sus-
than 1500 are not candidates for this medication. ceptible to ototoxicity, which is also dose dependent and per-
Dysrhythmia, angina, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, petuated by aminoglycoside use.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.