Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 22

STATE OF INDIANA

COUNTY OF MARION
JEFF HOWELL
vs.
STATE OF INDIANA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
')
)
IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CRIMINAL DIVISION 3
49G03-0807-PC-158636
( ' (' ' ' ' I', II
PETITIONER'S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT RECORD
IN SUPPORT OF
PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF
JeffHowell #194392
New Castle Correctional Facility
P.O. Box A
New Castle IN 47362
Petitioner, prose
Exhibit 41
Exhibit 42
Exhibit 43
Exhibit 44
Exhibit 45
Table of Contents*
Affidavit in Support of Petition for Post Conviction Relief . .. . . . ... . ............ 217
Affidavit of Malcolm McMakin ... . ......................... . ......... . .... . ...... . .. 225
Yahoo Terms ofService ......................................... . ........... . ...... . .. 229
Tips for Chatting Safely . . .. . .......... . . . ........ . .. . ....... . ..... . ................... 231
Transcript of Chatbot Conversation ... . ........ . .............. . ............ . .. . . . . .. 233
Affidavit ... .. .. . ............... . ... . ....................... .. . . ................ . ........ 237
Certificate of Service .. . .. . .. .... . ....... . ................. . ..... . ... . .... . ... . ........ 237
*Note: Exhibit and page numbers continued from Exhibit Record filed previously.
216
EXHIBIT 41
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT
OF
PETITION FOR
POST CONVICTION RELIEF
217
STATE OF INDIANA
COUNTY OF MARION
JEFF HOWELL,
Petitioner
v.
STATE OF INDIANA,
Respondent
)
)
)
)
. . .)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
SS:
IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CRIMINAL DIVISION 3
CAUSE NO. 49G03-0807-PC-158636

@ JUN 0 7 2010
.
CUI!K P THr MARION GIRe\.11'1'
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
PETITION FOR POST CONVICTION RELIEF
Comes now the Petitioner, Jeff Howell, prose, and being first duly sworn upon his oath,
deposes and says as follows:
1. I am the Petitioner in post conviction relief proceedings under above-captioned
cause.
2. In support of the allegations presented in my prose Petition for Post Conviction
Relief, I swear and affirm the following facts:
On or about May 1, 2008, I, Jeff Howell, did enter the adult-restricted Yahoo chat rooms,
where I observed, among the proliferation of chat bots, a screen name that was not engaging in
conversation inside the chat room. Not knowing if this was also a chat bot or an actual human
being, I observed the screen name, indydiamondgirl08, for some time. While observing the
screen name in the chat room, I viewed its associated profile, which showed a photo of a female,
purportedly named "Ash" or "Ashley" and who was purported to be in Indianapolis. There was
very little information displayed, unlike the information typically found on a profile for a real
human being. There was no age listed on indydiamondgirl08' s Yahoo profile. Believing, at thi s
time, that "indydiamondgirl08" was, perhaps, simply another chat bot, based on the fact that the
Yahoo chat rooms are proliferated with chat bats, I did a Google search of the screen name
believing that, perhaps, it might reveal whether or not "indydiamondgirl08" was a chat bot or
/' _,
not. To my surprise, Google returned a "hit" on the screen name, which was a web page listing a
number of screen mimes in addition to indydiamondgirl08. Among the information contained on
this web page, were details indicating names listed thereon, were actually
. . . . . ... .. - .. - . . . . . . ' . . ... . . . .. ... ' .... . .::: .. _ .. _. : ::: : :::-:. :.. :- ... -:-.-.": - .:. :-:::.:;. ::.-: : :: .. : .. : : -. --. - -- -
screen names being used. by law enforcement agencies engaged in Internet decoy operations.
The search results for indydiamondgirl08 revealed that this screen name was, apparently, being
used by "Darin Odier" and "Indianapolis, Ind." was listed under the "department" heading. The
last column of the search results page was labeled "Comments," with most ofthe entries listed as
"Confirmed" or "Probable but unconf.", presumably an abbreviated version of"probably but
unconfirmed." The word "confirmed" was included with the results for indydiamondgirl08.
Thus, my conclusion was drawn that indydiariwndgirl08 was actually Darin Odier, whom I
presumed to be a police officer, with the Indianapolis [Metropolitan] Police Department, and that
this information had been confirmed in some way. I further concluded that this screen name and
""
individual (Odier) were being used in Internet decoy operations.
I then did a search for indydiamondgirl08 on MySpace, and did locate an associated
profile, which, like the Yahoo profile, listed very little information. The age on the MySpace
profile was listed as "99" (I have noted that the age now is listed as "1 01" on the most recent
MySpace profile, which will be included in Petitioner's Exhibit Record
1
). There was no
information on either profile that would definitively identify indydiamondgirl08 as a minor.
Initially, I left the chat room area, and logged off of the computer. During the time I was
not on the computer, the question occurred to me, "Why would a law enforcement agency be
conducting a decoy operation in a chat room that was restricted to adults?" This, perhaps more
than it should have, began to irritate me that a law enforcement agency, or perhaps a "lone" law
enforcement officer, would be wasting resources, including time and tax-payer dollars,
conducting such an operation in an environment where there would be no minors for a potential
1
As this Affidavit is being written, Petitioner is gathering infonnation for his Exhibit Record, which contain
documentation and evidence suppOrting his allegations presented in this Affidavit as well as the entire Post
Conviction Relief process.
Zl?
internet predator to contact. The more I considered this situation, the more infuriated I became,
admittedly, more so than I probably should have been, but at the same time, it has always been a
ultimately results in a waste of tax dollars, and the tax-payers, of which I am one, deserve a
better use of their hard-earned money, which they have involuntarily provided to better their
safety and security.
Thus, after pondering whether this is a sufficient disbursement of the citizens' tax dollars
in pursuit of their better protection, I decided to log back on to Yahoo chat, where I rejoined the
Indiana chat room where the decoy had been observed, and saw that he was still in the chat
room. I again observed him for several minutes, after which I made the decision, albeit perhaps
a rash decision given how infuriated I was at the time, to engage indydiamondgirl08 in a
conversation.
My initial conversation was somewhat innocuous, sharing the familiar "a/s/1"
(age/sex/location), in which indydiamondgirl08 claimed to be a 14 year old female from
Indianapolis. My intentions were to draw out information from this screen name that would
reveal that it was, in fact, a decoy. Among comments made during my initial conversation, I
allowed several opportunities for the decoy to "redeem" himself, by, for example, asking him if
he was a "cop looking for pervs" and using slang that would most likely only be known ts:>
someone involved in law enforcement. Also during this initial conversation, I made no attempt
to hide my identity, providing my real name, age, location, the fact that I also worked in law
enforcement, as well as a link to my My Space profile where my photos could be found. Ifi had
wanted to maintain my anonymity during any of the conversations, I most certainly could have
done so, by using a proxy server or "web anonymizer," however, my intent was not to avoid
discovery of my identity (bearing in mind that I also used my real name, location, and other
information during the initial contact, that would easily identify me). Rather, I wanted to make it
"easy" to find me, knowing that Odier would trace my IP address which would identify the
connection point I was using to connect to the Internet. My intent was also to make Odier
believe that I believed that he was a 14 year old girl, thus my conversation was tailored to that
end. At no time did I ever believe I was actually communicating with a minor, based on the
...... - ..... -- ... --- ...... .. .
. --- : . :"- -- .. -- :---- --- -- - - -------------- -- ----- -----------
results that I had obtained from my Google search ofOdier's fictitious screen name.
After the initial conversation with Oc;lier, I decided to switch to another screen name that I
had created some time ago and one in which I had taken on the persona of an 18 year old female
named Kristi Russell, with the screen name kristi_russell_90210. Knowing that Odier would be
able to easily connect that screen name to the screen name I was initially using (john_doe8238),
based on the fact that, assuming he would trace "Kristi's" IP address as well, the IP address
would be identical to the one being used for the john_doe8238 conversation, I knew that Odier
would eventually be able to tell that "Kristi" and I were one in the same.
The conversation using the "Kristi" persona was explicit in tone in order to grab Odier 's
full attention. Although this conversation was explicit, it was never obscene according to the
standards adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court to define obscenity. Also, during this
conversation, "Kristi" did offer to send Odier two photos, which he accepted, depicting nudity,
but these photos did not constitute obscenity under the U.S. Supreme Court 's definition of
obscenity. In addition, the fictitious "Ashley" (Odier) had to take affirmative steps to receive
those photos, after being presented with previews of those photos, called "thumbnails," in order
to actually receive the photos through Yahoo's photo sharing process. An individual has the
option of not downloading any photo proposed to him or her during the photo sharing process if
(s)he so chooses, for whatever reason. Thus, while this conversation might have been found to
be "offensive" to some people, as well as the photos that were offered to Odier's fictitious
persona, neither the conversation nor the photos were obscene, e v e ~ as to minors, under the U.S.
Supreme Court's definition of obscenity
2
. Additionally, Odier's fictitious persona was not forced
to view or download the two photos; he could have chosen to ignore them after viewing the
2
Petitioner will provide relevant citations in his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
z - ~ I
thumbnails.
Odier's fictitious persona was also not forced to participate in the conversation,
.. notwithstandingthe factthat the cqn_versatiqnJqqk.place,or was initiated in, an adult
--- . .. . - . . ... .. . ..... . ___ .. ..... .... . . .. :: ... . . .. "' - :: - . -...:. --- :.: ;
environment that is restricted to users who are 18 or older. An individual, whether an adult or a
minor, certainly has the option of ignoring and even blocking messages from others that may be
encountered in a chat room or otherwise on the Internet. If an Internet user finds a conversation
offensive, (s)he can simply opt out of that conversation. There is no way to force someone into
an unwanted conversation on the Internet.
The conversation between "Kristi" and Odier's fictitious persona was carefully
constructed so as not to violate any laws, even if it would have involved an actual minor. There
was no solicitation for sex, and there was no solicitation to meet or otherwise make contact
outside of the relative safe confines of the Internet. Although Odier's fictitious persona was
~
posed the question "would you ever want to meet" there was obviously never the intention to
follow up on that, knowing that indydiamondgirl08 was actually Odier. Odier 's fictitious
persona was also asked for "her" phone number, which was provided, but there was never an
attempt to call that number, knowing that it was associated with Odier. While the "Kristi"
conversation did involve female masturbation aimed at Odier's fictitious persona, masturbation
by a minor, alone, in the privacy of his or her own home, is not a crime in Indiana, even when an
adult female is "coaching" the minor involving a normal, healthy, activity. Again, Odier 's
fictitious persona was not forced to engage in any conduct unwillingly.
After the two initial primary conversations on May 1, 2008, there was little contact with
Odier 's fictitious persona, except for an occasional message on the order of "hey, how are you
doing?" These incidental messages were intended as "follow-up" contact to make Odier believe
that I was still "interested" in whatever it was Odier thought I was interested in.
My knowledge that, as ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Internet receives full First
Amendment protection, and the fact that these conversations took place or were initiated in im
adult environment that is a chat room known to me to be restricted to individuals who are at
' '
least 18 years of age, along with the fact that I had done a Google search of Odier's fictitious
- -,_ screen,name,, and that search.revealed tlJ.at indydiamondgirl 08. was iQ_fact ;:t$Ociated with
Internet decoy operations, makes it clear that I had no criminal intent and that at no time did I
believe I was in contact with an actual minor. Additionally, even if an actual minor had been
involved, still no crime was committed as none of the actions that I took would have constituted
a crime under current statutes.
I am not a pedophile, hebephile, ephebophile, nor am I an Internet, or any other kind of,
predator. My exhibits to be filed in this action will support the fact that I committed no crime_ I
will also provide exculpatory documentation t ~ a t trial counsel failed or refused to present at trial,
as well as support my allegations that Odier lied about Yahoo's chat room age restriction and the
requirement to enter a date of birth when creating a Yahoo account/profile.
_.
Further Affiant sayeth naught.
I hereby swear and affirm under the penalties for perjury that the foregoing
representations are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief
Affiant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, JeffHowell, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Affidavit in Support
of Petition for Post Conviction Relief was served upon the Marion County Prosecutor
(71
~ J---/1 ~ 1 / . /
this day of_-=_v_/_...,_"'"" __ ___, 2010, by placing a copy of same in the United States
Mail , First Class, postage pre-paid.
Petitioner, pro se
Jeff Howell
2497 Middle Leesville Rd.
Bedford IN 47421
EXHIBIT42
AFFIDAVIT
OF
MALCOLM MCMAKIN
225
SJ'j\ TE OF INDIANA
COUNTY OF MARION
JEFF HOWELL
vs.
STATE OF INDIANA
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
IN THE MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CRIMINAL DNISION 3
49003-0807-PC-158636
49G03-0811-PC-270239
AFFIDAVIT


Comes now the Affiant, Malcolm McMakin, and declaring under oath and penalty of perjury
deposes and says the following in support of the Petition for Post Conviction Relief filed under
the above-captioned cause:
I have been acquainted with Jeff Howell since the early 1990s. I have a backgr6tmcl in law
enfbrceinent, and have served, inter aiia, as a Chief Deputy C6roner and Speclal Deputy Sheriff.
Along with Mr. I WaS ' .
Homeland Security.
Mr. Howell is a dedicated public servant with an admirable reputation among the law
enforcement community. He does not take his oath lightly. He is well decorated, having been
recognized by Governors, Senators, and Members of Congress.
Mr. Howell had indicated to me, .prior to his trial, that he had engaged in the chat with Det.
O(lier, knowing that he was actually chatting with Odier after conducting a Google search, the
results of which revealed that the screen name used by Odier was actually Odier. Mr. Howell
told me that he engaged Odier in the chat in order to challenge the constitutionality oflndiana's
child solicitation statute. Mr. Howell told me that this chat occurred in a chat room that was
restricted to adults. I was further told by Mr. Howell, prior to his trial, that he had
documentation saved on a thumb drive that would prove his innocence. After his trial, Mr.
told rile that his attorney to ilrty thiS' evidence and that Odier
tnaL Mr. that-he' had friend to.log on tohis:yah:o()
account and send innocuous Il1essages to Odier to simply prove that it cnuldbe done, because
Odier had apparently indicated that no one could log on to an account other than the account
owner. Mr. Howell also told me that he wanted that friend to testify at his trial.
Prior to Mr. Howell's trial, I had expressed to Mr. Howell my desire to testify before the
Court, however, I was never given the opportunity to testify about any of the matters presented in
this affidavit.
Further, Affiant Sayeth Naught.
I hereby swear and affirm under the penalties for peijury that I have read the foregoing and
that it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, belief and recollection.
)a;l}'i
--,:" ... . 0. 0 0 '--,(\ , (\fln "
-\ ,), . U<.&---10 \A.. \
. .
Malcolm McMakin
7648 E. County Road 650 S.
Hardinsburg IN 4 7125
812-472-3007
re..6/ .-;y l/J Wr;;-.o'on 'V--7'
1f t!..ol??/-l;J,.;;>fl<> a;yJYe J J/ J;l-c:?o/0--'
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
.
I hereby certify that on this -day of April, 2011, a true and accurate copy of the
foregoing Affidavit was duly served upon Julie Kirchoff, Marion Count)' Deputy Prosecutor, 251
E. Ohio Street, Room 160, Indianapolis IN 46204, by placing same in the U.S. postage
prepaid.
. (}:7 .
. Pertier :p;:ose-==- ..
JeffHowell #194392
New Castle Correctional Facility
P.O. Box A
New Castle, IN 47362
EXHIBIT43
YAHOO
TERMS OF SERVICE
229
i' . .
Yahoo! Terms of Service
Yahoo! Info Center> Yahoo! Terms Center> Yahoo' Terms of Service
Ernail Print
Yahoo! Terms of Service
1. ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS
Yahoo! Inc. ("Yahoo!") welcomes you. Yahoo! provides its service to you subject to the following
Terms of Service ("TOS"), which may be updated by us from time to time without notice to you.
You can review the most current version of the TOS at any time at:
http://info. yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/utos-173.html. In addition, when using particular
Yahoo! owned or operated services, you and Yahoo! shall be subject to any posted guidel ines or
rules applicable to such services, which may be posted from time to time. All such guidelines or
rules (including but not limited to our Spam Policy) are hereby incorporated by reference into the
TOS. Yahoo! may also offer other services that are governed by different Terms of Service. For
instance, different terms apply to homesteaders on Yahoo! GeoCities or members of AT&T
Yahoo! Dial or AT&T Yahoo! High Speed.
2. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Yahoo! provides users with access to a rich collection of resources, including various
communications tools, forums, shopping services, search services, personalized content and
branded programming through its network of properties which may be accessed through any
various medium or device now known or hereafter developed (the "Service"). You also
understand and agree that the Service may include advertisements and that these
advertisements are necessary for Yahoo! to provide the Service. You also understand and agree
that the Service may include certain communications from Yahoo!, such as service
announcements, administrative messages and the Yahoo! Newsletter, and that these
communications are considered part of Yahoo! membership and you will not be able to opt out of
receiving them. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, any new features that augment or enhance
the current Service, including the release of new Yahoo! properties, shall be subject to the TOS.
You understand and agree that the Service is provided "AS-IS" and that Yahoo! assumes no
responsibility for the timeliness, deletion. mis-delivery or failure to store any user
communications or personalization settings. You are responsible for obtaining access to the
Service, and that access may involve third-party fees (such as Internet service provider or
ai rtime charges). You are responsible for those fees, including those fees associated wi th the
di splay or delivery of advertisements. In addition , you must provide and are responsible for all
equipment necessary to access the Service.
3. YOUR REGISTRATION OBLIGATIONS
In consideration of your use of the Service, you represent that you are of legal age to form a
bi nding contract and are not a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the
Unrted States or other applicable jurisdiction. You also agree to: (a) provide true. accurate.
current and complete information about yourself as prompted by the Service's registration form
i the "Registrat ron Data") and (b) maintain and promptly update the Registration Data to keep it
true. accurate, current and complete. If you provide any information that is untrue. inaccurate.
not current or incomplete. or Yahoo! has reasonable grounds to suspect that such information is
Seat
-
EXHIBIT44
TIPS FOR
CHATTING SAFELY
231
YA:a:aor MEssENGER
Tutorial s Contac t
ne1p. Search
Tios for Chattino Safelv
Yahoo' Chat allows people from all over the world to chat. make friends and build communi ties. Chat
Ciln OP fjn Pnrirhino exnNiPn('f' hut I?VPNnnf' Shnlltrl he 'lW;Jrp !hilt likP in il!lV Ollhlir. <Jreil 00 thp
To heir) r: ref!te il s'! fe r hilttioo PxoPrif'! nce we have or1t too.ether thi<>. ouirle to he/Q or1r customers
Cn;- atinq ;m ID for Chattinq
Each person who ventures online needs an 10-a unique nrckname (or alias) that allov.-s him or her
to be recoonizerl while narii ci o<Jti no io the lnternPt communifv
Yahoo' Chat offers members the abilitv to chat under aliases. which allows them to hi de thei r email
ilrldre"ses WP encoumae vo11 to U"-e thi s teatwe to orolect vour identitv ilnd orpvent random
EntNin() an alias
Enierrng an alias is easy Aller you j olfl a room (to do i ilat , ci ick the Messenger menu. ciick Yahoo!
Chat then Join il Room\ iust tvoP iln ali<Js after "Enter Chil l room as
Remember. your alias is a way that others in the chat can identify you. Our recommendation is to
NOT divuloe anv accurate oersonal information in vour <'!l ias You don't wilnt st ran!Jers to know ton
mucrt about you just !rorn reod:n9 ycur if...'.
Online IDs can communicate somethino about the oerson bP.hind them so be certain of what vou
are willing to share. For example. the name '' Butterflyfan'' communicates that a user might be fond of
butterflies There is litt.le ri sk of someone beino abl e to distinouish one fan of butterflies from thp
millions of others who exist in the world. On trr"e other !land. fhe name "Butterflies4Jane" mav ao too
f::Jr It orovides someone with a name--both il convers;Jtion starter and a misguided sense of
ra rn;nanry
When creating a new online I D. vou mav want to leave out the foll owi ng information
r i! Sl ?.no !Ct.Sl ncorne
.A.ddress
Ph0ne
Family names
Whatever vou choose remember that VOtJr ID should he suitable not too revealing and lmost
!lllpOf\il!'llj !Ui'l '
Tips for Safe Chattin!'!
Don't chat about things that could enable a stranger to locate you. That includes vour last name. the
name of vour school or workplace the citv vou live in arnJ where votr hano out
Protect your info. Don't put identifiable information in your user profile. including photos. What's
uolnaded to the Internet he downloaded anti shared bv eveNone Avoid oostino ohotos thilt
allow people to identify you. especially sexually suggestive images. Before upl oading a photo. think
ahotrt how you'd feel if it were seen bv il parent . frien<i . or future emolover
Never meet with someone you encounter in a chat room unless you al re ady kr.ov,o wr;o they c;re.
Be honest ilbout your age &ahoiOi ChiltiSJestrldedtoUiers-!Nho 9;.., 18 older If vr:>u
are too young to sign up. do not attempt to lie about your age. Talk with your parents about
alternative sites !hilt mav be aonropriate for vou
AOO!tl onar t-<esour ces
For more information about online Silfetv as well as how to handle and reoori abuse on Yilhoo'
Chat, piease visit the foiiowing sites:
Online Safetv
htlp'l/family yahoo com/
http://help.yahoo.comll/us/yahoo/messenger/messenger9/chat/mstachatsafe.html
Page I of2
9/16/2008
EXHIBIT45
TRANSCRIPT OF
CHATBOT
CONVERSATION
233
(
inspector _gadget_ 02: hello
Alexis McCutcheon: hey what's up?
inspector_gadget_02: nm u?
Alexis McCutcheon: nm just chillin
inspector _gadget_ 02: cool
Alexis McCutcheon: yeah i guess
inspector_gadget_02: a/s/1?
Alexis McCutcheon: 15/f/Columbus
inspector_gadget_02: what's your name?
Alexis McCutcheon: Alexis
inspector_gadget_02: are you really 15?
Attachment 4
Alexis McCutcheon: sure, if you want me to be 15 then i'm 15
inspector _gadget_ 02: how old are you for real?
Alexis McCutcheon: how old do u want me to be?
inspector _gadget_ 02: are you a cop looking for pervs?
Alexis McCutcheon: lol of course not
inspector _gadget_ 02: are you a bot?
Alexis McCutcheon: what's a bot?
inspector_gadget_02: nm
Alexis McCutcheon: k
inspector _gadget_ 02: where do u go to school?
Alexis McCutcheon: columbus north
inspector_gadget_02: what do you look like?
Alexis McCutcheon: umm well i'm about 5-2 95 pounds blonde hair and blue eyes
inspector _gadget_ 02: how long is your hair?
Alexis McCutcheon: just past my shoulders
inspector _gadget_ 02: whats ur favorite tv show?
Alexis McCutcheon: well i don't watch much tv but i like survivor and are you smarter than a 5th
grader
inspector _gadget_ 02: cool
Alexis McCutcheon: yeah i guess
inspector_gadget_02: what do your parents do?
Alexis McCutcheon: well my mom's a nurse and i haven't seen my dad in a long time
inspector_gadget_02: does your mom work at a hospital?
Alexis McCutcheon: no she works at a doctor's office
inspector_gadget_02: do you have any brothers or sisters?
Alexis McCutcheon: i have a brother that lives in evansville and a sister in california
inspector_gadget_02: what r u wearing?
Alexis McCutcheon: umm pink shirt and blue jean shorts
inspector_gadget_02: what kind of music do you like?
Alexis McCutcheon: all kinds really but rock mostly
inspector _gadget_ 02: what's your favorite group?
Alexis McCutcheon: hmmm well i like nickelback a lot
inspector_gadget_02: what do you wanna do after school?
(
Alexis McCutcheon: yes i'm a virgin as far as sex is concerned
inspector _:_gadget_ 02: whats that suppose to mean?
Alexis McCutcheon: well i sorta got hurt riding my horse ifu no what i mean
inspector _gadget_ 02: oh ok i gotcha
Alexis McCutcheon: yeah technically cuz of that i'm not a virgin but i've never had sex
inspector_gadget_02: can i call you sometime?
Alexis McCutcheon: yeah but not unless i know u r gonna call cuz it has to be when mom's not
here
inspector _gadget_ 02: whats ur number?
Alexis McCutcheon: 812-379-4567
inspector _gadget_ 02: well i have to go but i hope to talk again soon
Alexis McCutcheon: ok ttyl
inspector _gadget_ 02: bye
Alexis McCutcheon: see ya
AFFIDAVIT
I, Jeff Howell, do hereby swear or affirm under penalties for pe:rjury, that the material
presented in the foregoing is authentic, true and complete in every respect, to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Jeff Howell, Petitioner, prose
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Jeff Howell, do herby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served
upon Julie Kirchoff, Marion County Deputy Prosecutor, 251 E. Ohio Street, Room 160,
Indianapolis IN 46204, this 19th of August, 2011, by depositing in the prison mail system for
delivery by U.S. Mail, First Class, postage pre-paid.
237
Petitioner, pro se
JeffHowell #194392
New Castle Correctional Facility
P.O. Box A
New Castle IN 47362

Вам также может понравиться