Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Abstract
This paper presents the effect of corrugation geometry on the crushing behavior, energy absorption, failure
mechanism, and failure mode of woven roving glass fibre/ epoxy laminated composite tube. Experimental
investigations were carried out on three geometrical different types of composite tubes subjected to
compressive loading. On the addition to a radial corrugated composite tube, cylindrical composite tube, and
corrugated surrounded by cylindrical tube were fabricated and tested under the same condition in order to
know the effect of corrugation geometry. The results showed that, CCT and RCCT specimens crush with
progressive folding forming continuous fronds, which spread radial outwards and inwards in the form of a
mushrooming failure. However, RCSCT specimen crushes in interaction between upper and lower side of
specimen. It exhibits lower total energy absorption than other two types. Corrugation geometry shows more
stability under axial compression load than cylindrical tube. The results also show that, radial corrugated
composite tube has more specific energy absorption than cylindrical composite tube.
Keywords: Corrugated composite tubes; Energy absorption capability; Axial compression crushing
1. Introduction
The design of air, sea, and ground vehicles is increasingly driven by minimum weight
considerations and by concerns for passenger safety. Composite structures are light, can
be tailored in composition and shape, and can provide high crashworthiness when used as
part of an energy-dissipating device [1].
Three types of specimens have been investigated, Circular Composite Tube CCT, Radial
Corrugated Composite Tube RCCT, and Radial Corrugated Surrounded by Circular
Tube RCSCT. The three structures are made of woven roving glass fibre/epoxy 600
g/sqm. All specimens fabricated under the same conditions with a fixed number of layers
equal to six. The height (h) for both structures is same, while the diameter (d) of CCT
structure is equal to mean diameter of RCCT structure (dm), where dm is the average of
(dup) and (dlw), however, RCSCT is a combination of RCCT covered by CCT. Details on
specimens’ geometry are given in Table 1.
The principle of wet winding process was used for the fabrication of all types of
specimens. However, there is a difference in the details of fabrication process for each
type due to the difference of the final shape need to be produced. A hand-lay-up process
was used for the fabrication process. The tube was fabricated by rolling the woven roving
fibreglass onto a rotating mandrel of suitable circular section. The woven roving fibre is
passed through a resin bath, causing resin impregnation.
Test was carried out under the same condition for all types of specimens. Static uniaxial
compression load was applied using an Instron 8500 digital-testing machine with full
scale load range of 250 KN. Load platens were set parallel to each other prior to the
initiation of the test. From three to five replicate tests were conducted for each specimen.
The tests were carried out at a speed of 15 mm/min. Load and displacement were
recorded by an automatic data acquisition system.
3. Results and discussion
As shown in Fig. 1, CCT tubes were crushed progressively from one end by splaying
mode. In each crush test the axial load increased initially and micro-fragmentation was
observed. As the load picked up, the tube wall expanded outward. With the platen
moving downward the longitudinal cracks advanced by splitting the tube wall in to many
segments. These segments were forced by the axial load to bend outwards in the shape of
fronds. However, RCCT has a similar folding failure mode as that of the CCT. As shown
in Fig. 2, the load first attains a high value then it drops to a lower level in first and
second stages. However, after a small displacement, a steady fluctuating load was
established. Subsequently, at the last stage load rise up rabidly due to end of crushing
zone. RCCT exhibit high load carrying capacity with obviously high buckling resistance
and minimum fluctuating load along RCCT crushing length was observed. RCSCT
specimens exhibit more rigidity under the axial compression force. It is fractured in a
form of interaction between the upper and lower parts of the specimen. These fractures
propagated along the specimen forming complete crush of the specimen (see Fig. 3).
Since RCSCT is a combination of CCT and RCCT with three layers each, it exhibits
lower total energy absorption.
CFE is the ratio between average crush load and initial crush failure load. It is useful to
measure the performance of an absorber. It can be calculated as
P
CFE =
P max
Where Pmax and P are the maximum initial and the average crushing load, respectively.
As far as the initial peak value of the load coincides with the highest peak force value, the
desired value of the CFE parameter is equal to 1, which is difficult to achieve in practice,
but an ideal absorber is said to exhibit a crush force efficiency of 100%. The results of
crush force efficiency and other parameters were listed in Table 2.
125
100
Load (KN) 75
50
25
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Displacement (mm)
125
100
Load (KN)
75
50
25
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Displacement (mm)
125
100
Load (KN)
75
50
25
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Displacement (mm)
Crushing of a tube will lead to compaction of the tube. This results in a continuously
increasing load level as the deformation increases. The relative deformation of the
absorber, at which compaction takes place, is referred to as the stroke efficiency (SE) of
the absorber. The SE can be obtained as
u
SE =
h
Where u and h represent the crush length and length of the tube, respectively.
P
Es =
Aρ
Where P is the average crush load, A is cross-sectional area of the tube, and ρ is the
density of the composite tube. High values of Es indicate the lightweight absorber.
150
125
100
Load (KN)
CCT
75
RCCT
50 RCSCT
25
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Displacement (mm)
5- RCSCT crushed at lower load than other two types of tested composite tubes. It
also exhibits lower values of tested parameters except specific energy as recorded
above.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Universiti Putra Malaysia and staff for the financial
support for this research.
References
Anne-Marie Hart, Norman A.F. Michael F.A (2000). Energy absorption of foam-filled
circular tubes with braided composite walls. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 19 31-50.
Thornton, P. H (1986). The crush behaviour of glass fiber reinforced plastic sections.
Cmp. Sci. Tech., 27 199-224.
Mahdi, E., Sahari, B.B., Hamouda, A.M.S., Khalid, Y.A (2002). Crushing behaviour of
cone-cylinder-cone composite system. Mech. Composite structure 2 99-117.