Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Agnes Bolt
Projecting from the general trends of past experiences may provide insight into the future career path for a particular artist, but there are many intangibles influencing an artists career that cannot be anticipated. Also, the time frame in which this report was generated was relatively short, and thus it relies almost exclusively on publicly available information, with little independent verification. My background: I am a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries and a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries. I have been working as an actuary in private industry and government for over 25 years. While I have used some of the skills I have developed as an actuary in creating this report, it is not an actuarial report and therefore I have not demonstrated compliance with requirements to issue a Statement of Actuarial Opinion. I have also been an active art collector and participant in the Washington, DC art community for over 20 years, so I am also relying on the knowledge I have gained through this experience.
1
Approach Taken This primary characteristic upon which the projections in this report are based is that Agnes Bolt is scheduled to receive an MFA from CMU in 2012. While attainment of an MFA is not a requirement for a successful artistic career, it is a significant element and one that provides comparable information. According to CMU, between1985 and 2009 there were 118 students who graduated from CMU with an MFA (CMU Grads or graduates)2. A list of those graduates is included in Attachment 3. This report examines the history of those graduates as a predictor of a career path for Ms. Bolt. Should Ms. Bolt fail to complete her MFA at CMU, this will no longer serve as an appropriate basis for projections. I assumed that a person actively working as an artist in 2011 will have significant information about their art career on the internet. I searched the internet for a CV for each of the 118 graduates. Failing to find a CV, I looked for similar information in another format. If I was unable to find any information, or found information about a non-art producing career, I assumed that the graduate was no longer working as an artist. I collected and recorded information from each CV, which provides a basis for determining how each graduate compared to the aspects of Ms. Bolts career that this report will consider. The information based on the review of past experience of CMU Grads has been supplemented with additional information that will be explained in more detail in the sections that follow. Working as a Professional Artist Of the 118 CMU Grads since 1985 included in this study, over 60% were still working as artists in 2011. Many of the graduates who do not appear to be working as artists were working in careers that clearly were aided by their training at CMU. Also, they may continue to create art for their personal pleasure without attempting to exhibit it publicly. To determine the likelihood that Agnes Bolt will continue to work as a professional artist, I took a weighted average of the length of time each of the 118 graduates continued to work as an artist after graduation, based on the information described above. For graduates who were no longer creating art, I assumed that they continued to work after graduation for of the time since graduation up to a maximum of 5 years. The use of a 5 year maximum was arbitrary, since I was unable to find statistics on the average length of time an artist continues to create art work after graduating with an MFA. I did sensitivity testing of the results using 10 years instead of 5 and found that it had little impact on the conclusions. With better information about the working lifetime of the graduates no longer working as artists, a more precise method could have been used to develop better estimates, but given the limitations of the data, the weighted average should provide a reasonable result.
Based on my review of the CMU Grads, Ms. Bolt is likely to continue to create art for her working lifetime. The table below shows the results of the calculation as the percentage of time, on average, since graduation that CMU Grads were working as artists. For example, after 5 years from graduation, the graduates worked as artists for almost 4 years (90% of the time). As shown in the table, through ten years after graduation, the percentage of time working as an artist was still approximately 90%. The percentage drops after that, but 25 years after graduation, CMU Grads still had spent two-thirds of their career since graduation working as artists. Based on this, it is likely that Ms. Bolt will be working as an artist in 2029 and beyond.
CMUGradsTimeWorkingasanArtistby Duration
100% PercentageofTimePostMFAWorkingasan Artist 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 5 10 15 YearsSinceGraduation 20 25
Exhibitions In order to determine whether the CMU Grads had success in exhibiting their work, I reviewed whether the graduates identified solo exhibitions and exhibiting work in museums. Forty-eight of the graduates identified having had a solo exhibition, which is 40% of the total group, but over two-thirds of those who are still working artists. It can be expected that some of those who are no longer working as artists had solo exhibitions, but probably fewer than those who are still exhibiting. The overall percentage of artists with solo exhibitions should be somewhere between 40% and 67%.
Similar to Ms. Bolt, many of the CMU Grads work is interdisciplinary, which tends to lend itself to participation in group exhibits, so this is an extremely high success rate in exhibiting work in solo shows. And with the exhibit for which this report is being prepared, Ms. Bolt clearly will be included in the CMU Grads with solo exhibitions. Only 7.6% of the graduates listed exhibiting work in a museum. I used some judgment in evaluating both the significance of the exhibit and the significance of the museum, and excluded listings that did not appear to be regular exhibits, or museums that appeared to focus regionally or otherwise be less beneficial to promoting the artists career. Excluding those graduates no longer exhibiting, the percentage jumps up to 12%. It is also relevant to note that looking at the artists still working who graduated more than 10 years ago, the percentage exhibiting in museums goes up slightly, indicating that the longer the artist works, the more likely they are to be exhibited in a museum. This is not necessarily intuitive given the focus on youth in the art world. Beyond exposure through temporary exhibitions in museums, I reviewed information to determine whether Ms. Bolt will have art acquired and regularly exhibited in museums. Since I live in Washington, DC, I looked to the 2007 study by the Guerilla Girls regarding the percentage of male artists on exhibit at that time in four DC museums3. The results below are not likely to be significantly different today. Museum Percent Male National Gallery of Art 98% National Portrait Gallery 93% Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden 95% American Art Museum & Renwick Gallery 88% These statistics point out the difficulty Ms. Bolt will encounter in having her work acquired and exhibited by major museums. Ms. Bolts work is probably more of a challenge for commercial galleries, given that the collectors who gravitate toward the type of work she produces are fewer than those who collect more traditional, though still contemporary work. Since museums do not function to sell art, Ms. Bolt should direct her career toward appealing to museums. If she is able to establish a presence at museums through temporary exhibitions, it will convey to collectors that her work has value and it will be deemed collectible by a wider group of patrons. It will also increase the possibility that her work may be acquired and exhibited by museums. Admittedly, getting museums to show her work is a challenge; Ms. Bolt should make a significant body of work that is of a size and scope to appeal to museums. Financial Sustainability According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), there were 23,600 fine artists working in the US in 2008 and that number is expected to increase to 25,700 by 2018. Of that group, the number of self-employed artists, who are likely to support themselves by
3
selling their artwork, was 14,100 in 2008, growing to 14,800 by 2018. According to the same study, the median income for salaried fine artists was $42,650. The BLS did not provide an estimate for self-employed fine artists but noted, [m]any, however, find it difficult to rely solely on income earned from selling paintings or other works of art.4 The competition for exhibition slots in commercial galleries and other venues that sell contemporary art will likely increase, since the number of such exhibition spaces is not likely to match the increase in the number of fine artists. Ms. Bolt is therefore unlikely to be able to support herself from selling her artwork and will have to secure other employment unless she is otherwise able to support herself without working. Due to periods of very intense effort in the creation of her work, she will not be able to work a typical 40-hour work week and continue to create art as she currently does. I can report from my experience as a participant that it was difficult to keep up with my limited responsibilities for this project while working a full time job. Should she seek employment, Ms. Bolt will most probably work in a field that is related to her training at CMU. Recognition by the General Public One key element for an artist desiring to cross over and become recognized by the general public is to get press coverage in significant media outlets. I reviewed the exposure CMU Grads received in nationally significant newspapers and periodicals. Again there was a subjective element in this determination. I tended to exclude coverage in major metropolitan newspapers if it was the home town paper of the artist, unless that town was one of the major US art centers New York, Los Angeles, or Chicago. Based on my criteria, 11% of the CMU Grads received such exposure. That figure rose to 18% if I only considered those artists who are still active. And again, when I looked at only those artists who had graduated at least 10 years ago, the figure increases slightly to 20%, indicating some benefit of perseverance. I also considered the hypotheses that there is not currently a living artist with broad recognition among the general public, and that most artists known to the general public are male. To test these hypotheses, I gave a two-question survey to a sample of acquaintances who do not follow the art world. I asked them to 1) name a living nationally, or internationally known artist and 2) name a nationally, or internationally known female artist. They were instructed to write none if no one came to mind. Only three respondents (out of 9) wrote something other than none and two of those respondents listed artists who, upon review, did not meet the criteria. One respondent named Damien Hirst and Joan Mitchell. All of the respondents who answered something other than none listed a man for the first question. This, admittedly limited, sample supports both hypotheses mentioned above. This is not to say that living artists can no longer gain recognition with the general public, but that it is difficult, and doubly so for female artists. Artists who have gained wide recognition outside the art world generally
4
fall into one of two categories those who attract attention by being outrageous (e.g., Warhol, Dali) and those who have a sentimental appeal (e.g., Rockwell, Wyeth). Ms. Bolt has already received recognition in a significant magazine Harpers, and also in the Washington Post, so she has taken a step in the direction of general name recognition, but she has significant obstacles to overcome in order to achieve that status. While her work does have a very personal element to it, I do not believe she can gain general recognition through the sentimental appeal approach. The nature of her work puts her in position to strive for recognition by being outrageous. Summary While not a prediction of the future, a coordinated vision of a future for Ms. Bolt is that she will complete her MFA from Carnegie Mellon University in 2012. After graduation, she will get a technology job that gives her flexibility to work an irregular schedule. She will continue to create work that involves intervention. This will include developing a body of work that involves the occasional recurrent use of people she has worked with in the past. The new work will focus on challenging the relationships she developed with those people. This particular body of work will achieve both critical and popular success and will result in an exhibit at the Museum of Modern Art in 2021 that includes, among other work, this document. The MoMA exhibit will give Ms. Bolt exposure that will result in sustained attention in the art press for her future exhibitions, and exposure in the celebrity press for her non-art activities. This report has been prepared by,
Attachments: Attachment 1 Agnes Bolt Curriculum Vitae Attachment 2 Day 2: Expertise Attachment 3 - Carnegie Mellon University - MFA Graduates 1985 - 2009
Attachment 1
AGNES BOLT
Born Krakow, Poland, 1980 Living and working in Pittsburgh, PA and Brooklyn, NY
Screenings
Souvenirs from Earth, European Video art channel, featured artist, 2011-present, screened in Germany and France in Centre Pompidou, Paris among others Caught Looking IV, PNC Park Jumbotron Video Show, curated by Jacob Ciocci and Andrew Swensen, Pittsburgh, PA, 2010 Video Screening, Artist Image Resource 9th Annual Benefit, Pittsburgh, PA, 2010 A Few Plays About the Dark Performance Festival video screening. The Lutheran Church of Brooklyn, NY, 2009 Jerry video screening, MoMA Staff Exhibition, Museum of Modern Art, NYC, 2008
Guest Panel Artist, Visual Voices Symposium, Stedman Gallery, Rutgers-Camden Center for the Arts, 2010 Guest Artist lecture, Osher Lifelong Learning Institute at Carnegie Mellon, 2010 G18 Graduate Student Presentation, Kresge Theater, Carnegie Mellon University, 2009 Co-Curator, 4 Part Sustainability and Art Lecture Series, Museum of Modern Art, first event April 6th, 2009 Curator, Eco Art Staff Video Screening with artists such as Fritz Haeg, SuperFlex,Andrea Polli, FutureFarmers, Michel de Brion. Museum of Modern Art, April, 2008 and 2009 Creative Times exhibition Strange Powers, docent July- September 2006 Art:21: Art in the 21st Century, Curatorial Assistant, Season 3, 2006 Curator, various art and performance events at, Noh Gallery Collective, 2004-Spring 2005 Barely, by Seth Cluett, curated audio-based pool installation. Galapagos Art Space, Brooklyn, NY, 2003
Attachment 1
Education
MFA candidate, Carnegie Mellon University School of FineArt, 2012 BA, New York University, College of Arts and Science, New York, 1997-2001 Instituto Internacional, Madrid, Spain, 1999
Teaching
Teaching Assistant, Carnegie Mellon University, Fall 2009-Spring 2012 Advanced Contextual Practice; Concept Studios; Site-Specific Art Studio
Publications
The Braddocks, artist produced book, released Fall 2011. Essay by Dan Byers; designed by Brett Yasko Artisfear.tumblr.com. Journal of events from the Collectors perspective during Collectors Project Performance
Select Press Harpers Magazine. Readings. August, 2011 Featured Virtual Studio Visit on Sickoftheradio.com, August 2011
Capps, Kriston. Together, patron and artist endure a live-in, week-long performance art project. Washington Post, May 15,2011 Green, Tyler. Modern Art Notes. Artinfo, May 16, 2011 Greenwood, Arin. Agnes Bolt Is Smelling Ripe After a Week in the Plexiglass Bubble. Washington City Paper, May 14, 2011 NBC Washington News. Artist Spending Week in Living-Room Bubble. May 11, 2011 Featured on www.sickoftheradio.com, November 24, 2010 Featured on www.todayandtomorrow.net, November 6, 2010 Rozendaal, Rafael. www.newrafael.com, 2010 Levine, Marty. Pop City. September 16, 2010 Brittany Yam. PushPin Gallery Blog. Featured Artist in May, 2010 Sloss, Eric. College of FineArt Lab6 Podcast, Guest Artist, www.cfa.cmu.edu/labA6.php?sub_page=media, 2010 Rice, Scott. Seattle Gay News, Feb. 13, 2009
Re: Day 2
Attachment 2
Subject: Re: Day 2 From: Agnes Bolt <agnes@agnesbolt.com> Date: 8/19/2011 8:04 PM To: Philip Barlow <pbar@verizon.net>
You are an artist, but my knowledge of your work is limited to performancebased work. I assume that all art springs from a grounding in more traditional techniques. So for your task, I would like you to draw an image of the two of us together. The drawing should be done without referencing any images of either of us during the actual creation of the drawing. I realize we will be interacting over the next several days and that you will see my image at times during the period and that is ok, but the drawing itself should be done from memory. I would also like the drawings to be of scale so that you have to make an assumption of our relative sizes, since we have never actually been together in person.
On 8/19/2011 9:18 AM, Agnes Bolt wrote: Day 2 Dear Philip,
1 of 2
8/28/2011 7:46 PM
Attachment 3
35 36 37 38
6 7 8 9 10 11
39 40 41 42 43
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
44 45 46 47 48 49
20 21 22 23 24
50 51 52 53 54 55
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
56 57 58
59 60 61
32 33
Attachment 3
69 70 71 72
96 97 98 99 100
73 74 75 76
77 78 79 80 81
82
83 84 85 86 87
88
89