Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Lorrie Graham
Philosophy 251
University of Phoenix
on the trials and tribulations of two different societies. There is a contrast between two
different states I have lived in and currently live—Charleston and Atlanta. The difference
is noted from my recent vacation and I decided to return to my previous home for a
slower pace of life even if it meant for a short period of time. Charleston is like a brand
new discovery only limited in its scope. One trip around the Charleston Area and you
have pretty much seen it in its entirety. The only disadvantage of living in Charleston is
the sudden fact that you will have to brace yourself for its hurricane season and the mere
fact that the people are little more hospitable in the surrounding Charleston Area.
challenge—day in and day out. My sunny disposition can attest to this from a different
perspective. There is no other way to describe Atlanta other than it’s a wake up call to
the other side of insanity. “Where is the love?” I ask especially when commuting
becomes an event with a myriad of road warriors and angry mobs vying for space on the
highway. Atlanta is a distant place and, oftentimes, unfriendly. I’m doing my best to
survive the mean streets of Atlanta but it’s getting harder by the minute. Therefore, I’ve
decided to make my eventual trip back to Charleston when I’ve accomplished my goals.
Now looking at language and its diversity, one can see the impact that language
has on society and the world today. We have many cultures imbued into one society but
we use language in different ways to communicate to one another like sign language for
the deaf, slang terms used to convey similar meaning but different context, learning to
speak another language i.e. Spanish, French, German, etc. The diversity of language can
Lorrie Graham Brent Muirhead
08/29/06 PHL 251
Thinking and Language 3
be an advantage as we have the ability to transcend understanding of different cultures.
But the greatest challenge for language itself is circumventing the pitfalls of language
that can easily lead to misunderstandings or even create a backdrop for war.
generalizations, abstracts, and other word meanings play a huge factor on how we deliver
language.
We use language to explain our feelings, emotions, and nonverbal cues to express
this in various ways. People from other cultures have their own customs and beliefs that
fit their tradition and ignorance can play a part in miscommunication. This can result in
conflict and the many obstacles of language, whether verbal or nonverbal, we face today.
For instance, an online article from the Ten3Businesse-Coach states, “In some cultures,
others it is seen as challenging and rude. In USA, the cheapest, most effective way to
connect with people is to look them into the eye. Most people in Arab cultures share a
great deal of eye contact and may regard too little as disrespectful. In English culture, a
certain amount of eye contact is required, but too much makes many people
uncomfortable. In South Asian and many other cultures direct eye contact is generally
assumption, fallacies, inductive and deductive reasoning that coincide with the ability to
persuade others to think along our way of reasoning. Persuasion is used in everyday life
in question. We have to think critically or we face making grave decisions that can affect
us long-term. Thinking outside the box can bring innovative, unique ideas whether it’s in
the workplace or classroom. The real challenge is applying critical thinking to everyday
life and asking others to rise to the occasion. Kirby and Goodpaster state, “Our thinking
is confined within the language that is “running” in our brain. Language is the
interpretative medium for the input—the remembering, sorting, creating, judging, and
deciding—and language also dramatically shapes those processes. Without language our
cerebral cortex, able to conceptualize the universe, would drape around our lower brain
www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/crosscuttings/cross-
cultural_differences.html.
Kirby, Garry R. and Goodpaster, Jeffery R. (1999). Critical Thinking: Language Our
Thinking Medium, p. 1-17. Retrieved August 18, 2006, from the University of