Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
spiritual and economic autonomy. By starting her own businesses, along with her father’s
autonomy unknown to many women of the era, especially women of her station and with
so many children. What separates her from many other women of the day is that Margery
actually accomplishes many of her goals toward autonomy and independence. She does
this through means of economics, using her family’s wealth and her own, through her
own businesses. When Margery desires freedom from her husband’s sexual desires, she
is able to use her acquired wealth to pay off his debts in return for his decision to
constant awareness of money” and her “perception of herself as property” (Delany 84).
Margery began life well-equipped to acquire a fortune—her family already had one. She
was “socially prominent and well-to-do, a member of one of the most prominent families
in one of England’s richest towns” (Delany 82). Her book “outlines an identity that is
predetermined by the interlaced claims of society and nature” (Staley 88). Her
prominence in society allows her to have a more legitimate economic role, as a woman
owning a business and providing for herself. Despite the failures of her two businesses, it
seems that she was wealthier than her husband, John Kempe. Margery is allowed free
will to act how she wants, with all of her fits and rages and eventually her ecclesiastical
yearnings, because of her monetary position. The “safety net her money gives her”
allows her to act in ways which would not be acceptable in mainstream society (Staley
121). For example, she arrays herself in extreme fashion, with “gold pipes on her head
and her hoods with the tippets were dagged” (Kempe 535). Margery, at times, especially
early in her narrative, appears entirely obsessed with money— what Delany calls the
“’cash nexus’: it pervades her consciousness as it pervaded her world, part of every
human endeavor and confrontation” (Delany 86). While Margery rejected many of her
fellow townspeople’s values, she retains an attachment to money despite her newfound
passion for God. Since her money is what allows her to maintain some semblance of
help her cause, of trying to live her life away from everyone’s prying eyes. The wealthy
privilege which few of her day were allowed. By already having a family fortune, along
with an accomplished husband, Margery was able to take the opportunity to try and fail in
her businesses—she had the capital and the opportunity to take the chance, which women
of a lower social class would not have enjoyed. Later, even after her enterprises failed,
Margery was able to travel all over England and Europe on her pilgrimages, also a luxury
of the privileged. Indeed, “her class position gave her independent access to the market,
as investor, producer, and consumer, and… this shaped her identity, particularly her
religious consciousness.” (Aers 87). Women were often prevented from embarking on
enterprises such as starting their own business: men thought that “by depriving these
women of any economic self-determination it would make them more dependent than
female wage-labourers, certainly than those without children, and perhaps more
dependent than the merchant’s dog” (Aers 89). If women had no outside outlet through
which to seek power, all power in the marriage belonged to the man. Why Margery was
allowed to begin her own business is never explained, and the odds against it ever
into the brewing business as a way to supplement her income. Even though the business
collapses, Margery’s business ventures are not complete yet. Although she believed that
the failure of the business was due to divine providence, she is determined to start another
business, if for no other reason than “pure covetousness and to maintain her pride.”
Friedrich Engels wrote, “Within the family the husband is the bourgeois and the
wife represents the proletariat” (Delany 84). While Margery seems to manage some form
basis, on the mere basis of gender. Even in a class-structured society, in which Margery
holds a special place as the daughter and wife of respected men of Norfolk, she is often
judged first as a woman, not as a business owner. While it “may be difficult to see
Margery as oppressed when she is wealthy and seems to hold her own so well,” she is
most damaging aspects of bourgeois society” (Delany 84). Nevertheless, it seems that
Margery is able to disengage from many “female” aspects of life, such as the raising of
her children, and tending of the household, primarily because of her social status and
monetary situation. She is in a better position than many of her fellow women.
When she simply cannot bear her husband’s overtures any more, Margery does
what any good businesswoman would: she brokers a deal, mutually advantageous to her
and her husband. Margery enters into a contract with her husband—she will pay his
monetary debts, and in return, he will release her from her debt, the marriage debt.
Perhaps the constant feeling of being treated as someone’s property leads her to treat
herself as property, a product to be bought, sold and bartered for. When her physical
person is finally secured from his advances, she is finally able to turn her attentions fully
to what she wanted to devote her time to all along, Jesus Christ. Delany writes,
“Margery, like any serf, buys manumission from her lord: the human property whose
While Margery Kempe often appears delusional and insane throughout her
autobiography, she also demonstrates a unique independence and a strategic mind for
economics, which, along with her social class, enables her to seek opportunities that most
women of lower social classes would certainly be denied. Her societal role is what
defines her and allows her to become who she is. Kempe’s autobiography “is not a book
of devotion; we are constantly aware of Margery in relation to her society” (Delany 82).
In Margery’s day, wealth provided the only “opportunity for those with enough financial
choices, to act on them and to foster at least the potential for increasingly differentiated
identities and liberties (Aers 96).” Without her economic independence and the secure
position in society it gave her, Margery would not have been able to achieve either her