Albert Embankment Foreshore

Site information paper

Introduction

Currently, untreated sewage regularly overflows into the River Thames from Londons Victorian sewerage system via combined sewer overflows (CSOs). The proposed Thames Tunnel would intercept these overflows through the use of a new storage and transfer tunnel, which would link west London and Abbey Mills Pumping Station. The sewage flow would then be transferred to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works via the Lee Tunnel. The reduction in untreated sewage entering the River Thames would bring long-term benefits for the environment and users of the River Thames. In order to deliver the project we need a number of sites along the route and this document identifies our current preferred site at Albert Embankment Foreshore.

Key facts
Local authority: CSO names: CSO spill volume in an average year: Site type: Duration of main construction works: Lambeth Clapham Storm Relief and Brixton Storm Relief 280,000m (equivalent to approximately 112 Olympic swimming pools) CSO site Approximately three and a half years.

Thames Tunnel
1

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Section 1: Introduction and site information
We are proposing to use the foreshore of the River Thames adjacent to Albert Embankment (A3036) for this construction work and to accommodate permanent structures required to operate the main tunnel. The site would be used to connect the existing local CSOs, known as the Clapham Storm Relief CSO and Brixton Storm Relief CSO to the main tunnel. The location of the site is shown in Figure 1A. The site extends into the foreshore of the River Thames from Tintagel House to south of Vauxhall Bridge. The Thames Path runs through the site, and within the site is the slipway from Albert Embankment (A3036) to the River Thames (known as Lacks Dock). To the east of the site are office buildings (Camelford House and Tintagel House) and the MI6/SIS building. To the north east is Albert Embankment Gardens and Peninsula Heights apartment block. To the south, beyond Grade II* listed Vauxhall Bridge, is St Georges Wharf, a mainly residential development which also includes offices, shops and restaurants. The site is located within the Albert Embankment Conservation Area. This site information paper sets out our proposals at Albert Embankment Foreshore. We have also produced project information papers, which cover overarching topics relating to the project. Where we consider that a project information paper is particularly relevant, we have highlighted this in a related documents box. At the end of this site information paper is a list of other documents, which may be of interest and a glossary of terms.

Related documents: Build

Introduction

CITY OF WESTMINSTER

Tintagel House Camelford House Brixton Storm Relief CSO Lacks Dock

Albert Embankme n

an i ll b M

Albert Embankment Gardens Peninsula Heights

Draft limit of land to be acquired or used Proposed tunnel route centreline

Local authority boundary Existing sewer Existing CSO

Grosv eno r Ro ad

Vauxhall Bridge

Clapham Storm Relief CSO

MI6/SIS

Spring Gardens

LAMBETH St. George Wharf

WANDSWORTH
Figure 1A: Albert Embankment Foreshore location plan

Vauxhall Station

Albert Embankment Foreshore

How we chose this site
What we proposed at phase one consultation
Through our site selection process, we identified four possible shortlisted sites to intercept the Clapham Storm Relief CSO and Brixton Storm Relief CSO. At phase one consultation, which was held between September 2010 and January 2011, we presented these sites: Foreshore, adjacent to MI6/SIS Building and Vauxhall Bridge Foreshore, adjacent to St. Georges Wharf and Vauxhall Bridge Open space, Claylands Road only intercepts Clapham Storm Relief CSO Albert Embankment Foreshore. Albert Embankment Foreshore was identified as our preferred site at phase one consultation.

What we are proposing at phase two consultation

We have considered the comments from phase one consultation, feedback from ongoing engagement and new information; and undertaken further technical work. We still consider that Albert Embankment Foreshore is our preferred site because it would allow the interception of both CSOs at one site rather than having two separate sites; and would have less effects than the other shortlisted sites.

Related documents:

Q&A

Consultation Site selection

Construction

Section 2: Construction
Construction activities
Construction activities are required to intercept the CSOs. We would construct interception chambers to intercept the CSOs. Connection culverts would link the interception chambers to a drop shaft (approximately 47m deep), through which flows would pass down to a short connection tunnel. This would then join to the main tunnel. Figure 2A illustrates the below ground infrastructure proposed. As the construction works would take place within the foreshore of the River Thames, permanent structures extending into the foreshore are required. These activities would take place within the area indicated by the red line in Figure 1A, in five main phases, lasting approximately three and a half years in total. The main construction activities associated with these phases are set out in Table 2.1.

Connection culvert

Existing overflow sewer Brixton Storm Relief

Construction

Interception chambers

Short connection tunnel

Valve chamber

Drop shaft

Existing overflows to River Thames

Existing overflow sewer Clapham Storm Relief

Main tunnel

Figure 2A: Illustration showing typical elements of below ground infrastructure

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Phase 1 Advance works
Table 2.1: Main activities during construction phases

Site setup

Figure reference
Typical working hours Utilities connected Site cleared

Varies

Figure 2C
Standard

Main construction activities

Temporary works in the River Thames constructed Site facilities and access set up Drop shaft excavated and built Tunnel boring machine delivered to site and assembled Short connection tunnel excavated and built Above and below ground structures constructed Mechanical and electrical equipment installed Temporary works in the River Thames removed Site restored and landscaped Temporary site facilities removed

Our typical working hours are expected to be: Standard: 8am-6pm weekdays, 8am-1pm Saturday* Extended standard: 6pm-10pm weekdays, 1pm-5pm Saturdays Continuous: 24 hours a day, seven days a week** Varies: Working hours for advanced works will depend on the nature of the works and will be agreed with the local authority
* Standard working hours would also include, subject to agreement with the local authority: a short period (up to one hour) before works start and after they have finished to allow our workers to prepare for work and check the site. equipment and machinery maintenance could also take place 1pm-5pm Saturday and 10am-4pm Sunday. ** The main activities taking place 24 hours a day are below ground or within an enclosure.

Construction

Phase 2 Drop shaft construction Figure 2D

Standard

Phase 3 Tunnelling

Phase 4 Construction of other structures Figure 2E

Standard

Phase 5 Completion of works and site restoration

Standard

Figure 2D
Continuous

Related documents: Build Managing construction

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Site layout and construction phases
Figures 2C, 2D and 2E show how the site might be laid out during the construction phases, which are set out in Table 2.1 and Figure 2B. These layouts have been informed by the size of the infrastructure, the construction methods required and the location of neighbouring buildings and structures. They have also been developed to minimise effects on the local community and environment. Particular factors at this site that have influenced the layout are as follows: The access route to the site has been amended since phase one consultation. The proposed access during phase one consultation was along the foreshore using Albert Embankment Gardens to gain access from the road. We are now proposing to access the site via a temporary road parallel to Lacks Dock. This eliminates the potential effect on Albert Embankment Gardens, the listed embankment wall and reduces the potential effects on nearby residential properties at Peninsula Heights. Year 1 P1 P2 Year 2 P3 P4 Year 3 P5 Year 4 The change in access arrangements reduces the extent of the temporary works required in the foreshore of the River Thames. The site layouts are indicative only, and the contractor may arrange the site in a different way, depending on the chosen construction methods, provided that any environmental effects are appropriately managed, and that the main construction activities are undertaken within the red line shown in Figure 1A.

Figure 2B: Construction timeline showing approximate duration of works in phases (P)

Advance works

Construction

Maximum extent of construction site for phase 1 Site hoarding Cofferdam Barges Local authority boundary Site support/welfare Thames Path diversion Internal site road Jack up barge servicing piling operations Site access Existing Thames Path Thames Path diversion

CITY OF WESTMINSTER

Va u

xh

all

Br

idg

LAMBETH N
Figure 2C: Illustrative phase 1 construction plan

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Option for contractor to transport materials using barges

Maximum extent of construction site for phases 2 and 3 Site hoarding Cofferdam Local authority boundary Crane Drop shaft Site support/welfare Excavated material storage and processing Maintenance workshop and storage Construction support

Piling rig Thames Path diversion

CITY OF WESTMINSTER

Va u

xh

all

Br

Internal site road

idg

Crane

Site access Existing Thames Path Thames Path diversion

LAMBETH

Figure 2D: Illustrative phases 2 and 3 construction plan

10

Construction

Option for contractor to transport materials using barges

Maximum extent of construction site for phase 4 Site hoarding Cofferdam Local authority boundary

Crane Thames Path diversion Crane Drop shaft

Site support/welfare Excavated material storage and processing Maintenance workshop and storage

CITY OF WESTMINSTER

Va u

xh

all

Internal site road

Br

idg

Crane

Site access Existing Thames Path Thames Path diversion

LAMBETH

Figure 2E: Illustrative phase 4 construction plan

11

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Additional works and activities
The main construction activities at this site are set out in Table 2.1. We would also need to undertake additional works and activities, some of which may be located outside of the area indicated by the red line in Figure 1A. The anticipated additional works and activities are set out in Table 2.2.

When

Type of works
Installation of equipment to monitor environmental matters such as noise, vibration and dust. Protection works to third party structures (such as buildings, bridges and tunnels). Temporary connection to utilities (such as water, sewer, phone and electricity supply). Dredging. Protection of the river bed.

What we would do
The locations of monitoring equipment would be agreed with the local authority and relevant landowners. We would undertake studies to identify any effects our construction work may have on third party structures. The studies may recommend particular construction methods or, in very limited instances, protection works. We expect to connect to utilities in Albert Embankment (A3036). There is a possibility that as the detailed design is developed we may need to undertake dredging to allow barges to get to and from our site. We may need to carry out works to strengthen the river bed to avoid scour. Due to particular requirements at this site, an off-site vehicle marshalling facility would be used to regulate construction vehicles entering the site. We anticipate that this holding area would be within a 10-15 minute drive from the site. We expect to connect to utilities in Albert Embankment (A3036).

Required for construction phase

Construction of a lorry holding area.

Required for operational phase

Permanent connection to utilities (such as water, phone and power supply) for the operational tunnel.

Table 2.2: Additional works and activities

12

Construction

Construction transport and access

We propose to use barges to bring in and take away the material used to fill the cofferdam. It is not generally practical and cost effective to transport all materials to and from the site by barge so we would still need to transport some materials by road. We would however give the contractor the flexibility to determine the most practical and cost-effective means of transporting other materials and equipment. Each barge would remove approximately 20 lorries from the road. Using barges at this site would reduce the number of lorry visits to/from this site by approximately 50% (saving 9,000 lorry visits over the construction period of approximately three and a half years). Table 2.3 sets out the anticipated average daily number of lorries and barges visiting (ie travelling to and from) the site during the peak months of each phase, based on moving cofferdam fill material by barge. Construction traffic would access the site by travelling north along Albert Embankment (A3036) and turning left into a new entrance adjacent to the Lacks Dock access. This access would allow London Duck Tours amphibious vehicles to continue using Lacks Dock. Traffic would leave the site by turning left onto Albert Embankment from the same entrance. These access arrangements have changed since phase one consultation where access was proposed through Albert Embankment Gardens. The new access route avoids Albert Embankment Gardens and is shown on Figure 2F. Beyond this, construction traffic would use the major road network to get to and from its final destination. The Thames Path runs across our site, including the location of our proposed access. We would create a temporary diversion for the duration of our works, as indicated on Figures 2C, 2D and 2E. Based on our current design we do not anticipate that any other footpath or road diversions, parking bay suspensions, bus stop relocations or junction changes would be required. As the site is close to the MI6/SIS building, an off-site vehicle marshalling facility would be used for security screening and to regulate construction vehicles entering the site. We anticipate that this holding area would be within a 10-15 minute drive from the site.

Related documents: Transport

Phase 1 Site setup

Phase 2 Drop shaft construction

24 lorries none

Phase 3 Tunnelling

Phase 4 Construction of other structures

21 lorries none

Phase 5 Completion of works and site restoration

11 lorries 2 barges

Average daily lorry visits Average daily barge visits

29 lorries 7 barges

4 lorries none

Table 2.3: Average daily lorry and barge visits during the peak months

13

Albert Embankment Foreshore

A3036
k an illb

CITY OF WESTMINSTER

A202 Vauxhall Bridge

Albert Embankment

LAMBETH

Left turn in, left turn out

WANDSWORTH
Figure 2F: Proposed access route to the site from the nearest major road

Lacks Dock access

Albert Embankment
N Draft limit of land to be acquired or used Internal site road Site access Local authority boundary Transport for London (TfL) road network 14

Construction

Management of construction works

Our construction works would be managed in accordance with an agreed Code of construction practice (CoCP). For phase two consultation, we have produced a draft CoCP Part A: General requirements, informed by CoCPs from other major construction projects in London and consultation with the local authorities. Through the environmental impact assessment process, schemewide principles to address potential effects on the local environment have been identified and integrated into the design. The CoCP Part A sets out scheme-wide control measures that would be used to minimise potential effects during the construction process. Table 2.4 sets out what we consider to be the key issues for this site during construction, and how we are currently proposing to address them.

Related documents: Environment

15

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Issue
Possible presence of significant prehistoric (Mesolithic and Bronze Age) archaeological remains in the foreshore of the River Thames.

Our response
As part of the Environmental Impact Assessment, we would undertake a preliminary site-based archaeological assessment, which would enable a more targeted and precise strategy to address potential effects to be developed for the site post-consent and in advance of construction. Further work, which is likely to comprise archaeological excavation and recording, would be carried out in accordance with a scope of works (Written Scheme of Investigation), which would be agreed with English Heritage, London Borough of Lambeth and other key stakeholders prior to the commencement of construction. We would manage our works in order to maintain safe access for London Duck Tours during construction. This includes construction of a separate access road to our site and management of the shared access onto Albert Embankment (A3036) through the traffic management plan. We have undertaken modelling to test the effect that the structure has on the flow of the river. The modelling has shown the proposed structure to be satisfactory and the Port of London Authority and other key stakeholders are satisfied the permanent works have a minimum effect on river navigation. A full navigational risk assessment will be undertaken for the temporary and permanent works. The Thames Path would be temporarily diverted via a safe alternative route to the east of the construction site, along Albert Embankment (A3036). Since phase one consultation, we have relocated the construction site access via Lacks Dock to reduce effects on the nearest residential properties. The contractor would be required to implement noise and vibration control measures at the worksite, which will be set out in the CoCP. Continuous tunnelling would only be undertaken for a short period of time to construct a connection tunnel from the drop shaft to the main tunnel.

Possible effect of foreshore construction activities on river navigation and river users, including London Duck Tours who operate from Lacks Dock.

Temporary diversion of the Thames Path.

Possible effect of noise and vibration on neighbouring areas.

Preliminary findings indicate that while there is the potential for dust nuisance effects, Possible effects on local air there are unlikely to be any significant local air quality effects at any of the sites. The quality and dust nuisance contractor would put in place air and dust control measures at the worksite, which will be in neighbouring areas. set out in the CoCP.

16

Construction

Issue

Our response

Since phase one consultation, we have reduced the extent of temporary works in the foreshore of the River Thames by relocating the construction site access via Lacks Dock. Possible effects on Ecological surveys of the River Thames and foreshore are being undertaken to identify foreshore habitat and river possible effects arising from construction activities. The contractor would put in place wildlife. various control measures at the worksite to minimise these effects as far as possible. These will be set out in the CoCP. Possible effects of construction activities on adjacent structures, which may cause settlement. Possible effects on river and tidal flow, causing erosion. We will undertake a detailed assessment of potential ground movement caused by our construction works and ensure that there is no damage to any structures located close to our works. We will undertake detailed river scour assessments once river bed samples have been taken. The foreshore and river structures would be monitored before construction starts and throughout the construction period.

Table 2.4: Key issues relating to construction

Related documents: Managing construction

17

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Section 3: Future use
This section describes the site after the completion of the construction work, ie when the main tunnel is in use the operational phase. Our permanent works, which are formed within a structure extending into the foreshore of the River Thames, need to incorporate functional elements which are required for the operation of the main tunnel. These include: Underground structures with ground level access covers including: a CSO drop shaft with an internal diameter of approximately 16m, connection tunnel to the main tunnel, connection culvert, interception chamber, valve chamber and a passive filter chamber. Two main ventilation columns up to 6m high. Two small diameter ventilation columns to the interception chamber up to 6m high. Maintenance vehicle access. An electrical and control kiosk. A pipe laid within the foreshore of the River Thames to connect the Clapham Storm Relief CSO to the interception chamber for the Brixton Storm Relief CSO. Table 3.1 sets out the site specific issues that have influenced our permanent design proposals and how we have addressed them in our proposed design.

Design
Since phase one consultation we have progressed the design for the permanent use and appearance of the structures at Albert Embankment Foreshore. The design of the permanent proposals follows our scheme-wide principles and takes into account comments made and ongoing engagement with the London Borough of Lambeth and other technical consultees.

18

Future use

Issue
Effects on river navigation and hydraulics.

Our response
Preliminary modelling has indicated that the proposed design is acceptable in terms of flow and scour of the river. A more detailed investigation is underway. The proposals have been discussed with the Port of London Authority and other key stakeholders to develop a layout that has a minimal effect on river navigation. Since phase one consultation, the drop shaft has increased in diameter as a result of detailed modelling. Our proposals for the permanent layout and design of the site have however sought to reduce the extent of the permanent works within the foreshore of the River Thames to minimise effects on water ecology as far as possible. Ecological surveys of the River Thames and foreshore are being undertaken to identify possible effects, and design measures would be incorporated where required. Construction of the tunnel would deliver river-wide improvements to local water quality, which would result in positive effects on river ecology, including habitat improvements and reduced fish kills. We have taken a contemporary approach to the design of the proposed structure adjacent to Vauxhall Bridge. We consider this design takes its reference from the monumental architecture of the MI6/SIS building (circular turrets and clean detailing) and would not detract from the setting of the Grade II* listed Vauxhall Bridge. The design of the above ground structure has sought to reduce the bulk of the permanent extension to the embankment and to minimise the potential effects on views of Vauxhall Bridge. The Thames Path would be restored after our works are complete and would be enhanced with a new landscaped public area where people can enjoy the views along the River Thames. The ventilation columns, in common with the scheme-wide ventilation strategy, are thinner and shorter than proposed at phase one consultation. We require two operational electrical and control kiosks at ground level and these would be designed to be unobtrusive with one located beneath Vauxhall Bridge and the other on the back edge of the proposed new public area in front of Camelford House. Future use

Loss of foreshore habitat and effects on ecology.

Effect on the setting of the Grade II* listed Vauxhall Bridge, and historic views along the River Thames.

Effect on the Thames Path.

Visual effect of the permanent works.

Table 3.1: Site specific issues that have influenced our permanent design

19

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F and 3G show the current site and provide illustrations of our design proposals. Further information on the development of our design can be found in the Design development report.

Related documents: Design

Figure 3A: Photo of the site before the works (north of Vauxhall Bridge)

20

Future use

Figure 3B: Artists impression of the site after the works are completed (north of Vauxhall Bridge)

21

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Figure 3C: Photo of the site before the works (south of Vauxhall Bridge)

22

Future use

Figure 3D: Artists impression of the site after the works are completed (south of Vauxhall Bridge)

23

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Figure 3E: Aerial view of the completed works (north of Vauxhall Bridge)

24

Future use

Figure 3F: Aerial view of the completed works (south of Vauxhall Bridge)

25

Albert Embankment Foreshore

New Clapham Storm Relief and Brixton Storm Relief CSO outlets Timber seating Display case for possible archaeological finds set into ground Open balustrade towards central London views Widened Thames Path

Timber seating Ventilation columns Electrical and control kiosk Vauxhall Bridge deck omitted for clarity

Electrical and control kiosk beneath Vauxhall Bridge Floodable terraces over Clapham Storm Relief CSO connection pipe

Alb

ert

Em

Ventilation columns

ban

km e

nt

N Foreshore interception structure for Clapham Storm Relief CSO Maintenance vehicle access via existing Lacks Dock accessway

Figure 3G: Layout of the site once construction works are complete

26

Future use

Operation and maintenance

Once the tunnel is operational, we would need access to the site occasionally for inspection and maintenance purposes. We expect to visit the site approximately once every three to six months to carry out inspections and maintenance of the ventilation and below ground equipment. This is likely to involve a visit by staff in a small van, and may take several hours. Once every ten years, we expect to carry out a major internal inspection of the tunnel and underground structures. This is likely to involve a small team of inspection staff, a small team of support crew and two mobile cranes to lower the team into the shaft. This is likely to take several days and would require temporary fencing around the shaft for safety and security while the inspection takes place. We may also need to make visits to the site for unplanned maintenance or repairs, for example, if there is a blockage or equipment failure. This may require the use of mobile cranes and vans. Permanent vehicular access would be from Lacks Dock.

Management of operational effects

We have undertaken technical work, including stakeholder engagement, to assess and identify the key issues associated with this site once it is operational. Table 3.2 summarises these issues and how we are currently proposing to address them.

Related documents: Odour

Issue
Possible odour effects during the operation of the tunnel.

Our response
Odour effects at this site are expected to be negligible because we have developed an Air management plan to minimise possible odour and air quality effects arising from the operation of the tunnel. The technology we are proposing to use at this site includes the use of passive below ground carbon filters that will remove possible odour before air leaves the ventilation equipment Permanent access would be required for maintenance and servicing purposes to the shaft and ventilation equipment. Any planned maintenance visits would be undertaken during normal working hours and all visits managed to avoid disruption to local residents, businesses and users of affected public areas as far as possible.

Disturbance from future maintenance access.

Table 3.2: Key issues relating to site operation

27

Further information
This section sets out documents which may be of particular interest. Further information on our proposals can be found on our website (www.thamestunnelconsultation.co.uk) or is available upon request (call our customer centre on 0800 0721 086).

Phase two public consultation material

Project information papers include general information about the Thames Tunnel project. There are 17 project information papers, which cover various aspects of the project. Those project information papers that may be of particular interest are set out below. Icon Title Build Details Provides information on the different types of sites required for the Thames Tunnel project and the typical construction activities that will be undertaken at each site. Sets out the consultation we have undertaken to date on the project, the scope of this phase two consultation and how interested parties can respond to this consultation. Contains the design principles which have influenced the permanent appearance of our sites once construction work is complete. Sets out the process the project is following to assess potential environmental effects of the Thames Tunnel project. Includes information on what measures our contractors will put in place at our sites during construction.

Q&A

Consultation

Design

Environment

Managing construction

Odour

Sets out our Air management plan and how it will work.

Options

Outlines the various ways to deal with sewage overflows.

28

Phase two public consultation material

Icon Title Details Sets out how Londons sewerage system works and why the capital has an overflow problem.

Overflow Route and tunnel alignment Site selection

Sets out the preferred route of the main tunnel and the reasons for our preference.

Sets out the process we followed to find and select our preferred sites. Contains information on the different transport options we have considered for delivering and removing materials from our sites.

Transport

29

Further information
Technical reports
Theme Phase one consultation Icon Title Report on phase one consultation: summary report Details Provides a summary of the comments made at phase one consultation and our responses.

SUMMARY

Phase two construction information

Code of construction practice Part A: Sets out control measures to be adopted during the project General requirements construction period. (CoCP) Air management plan Outlines the methods which we will use to manage odour from the main tunnel at all our preferred sites. Contains initial assessments on the environmental effects of the Thames Tunnel project based on information collected to date. Please refer to volume 19 of the non-technical summary and volume 19 of the PEIR for more information on this site. Provides a general overview of how the scheme design at each site has evolved to date. Please refer to chapter 16 for more information on this site. Provides an overview of the development of the Thames Tunnel project and how each site was chosen. Please refer to Appendix N for more information on this site.

Phase two environmental information

Preliminary environmental information report (PEIR) Design development report

Phase two scheme development

Phase two scheme development report

30

Site glossary
Term
Carbon filters Cofferdam Combined sewer Combined sewer overflow (CSO) Connection tunnel Conservation area Draft limit of land to be acquired or used Drop shaft Foreshore Interception chamber Main tunnel Operational phase Scour Thames Tunnel project Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) Tunnel boring machine (TBM)

Definition
Filters that remove odours before the air is released from the tunnel. A wall that is constructed within the river around the outside of the working area and then pumped dry. The inside of the cofferdam can then be filled to create a safe working area. A single sewer system that takes both rainwater and domestic and industrial wastewater. A structure, or series of structures, that allows sewers to overflow into the river when they are full as a result of increased rainfall. Without the overflows, the sewers would back up and cause flooding in streets or houses. A tunnel connecting a drop shaft to the main tunnel. An area designated by the local authority or English Heritage as having special architectural or historical interest. The extent of land that we may need to use or acquire, or over which rights may be needed to carry out works that are essential to the project. A vertical circular concrete structure, used to drop flows from the high level of the CSO to the low level of the main tunnel. It would also be used to provide access to construct the connection tunnels. Ground uncovered by the river when the tide is low. A structure, built on an existing combined sewer, which diverts stormwater overflow into the main tunnel. The tunnel from Acton Storm Tanks to Abbey Mills Pumping Station. After the completion of the construction work, when the main tunnel is in use. Movement of the riverbed materials due to the force of the water. The Thames Tunnel project comprises a storage and transfer tunnel, from west London to Beckton Sewage Treatment Works in east London, and the control of 34 CSOs along the Thames Tideway. The network of roads managed by Transport for London. These are the major or strategic roads, which have high capacity. A machine used to excavate tunnels through a variety of conditions, with a circular cross-section.

31

Albert Embankment Foreshore

Phase two consultation: Albert Embankment Foreshore Autumn 2011 110-ED-PNC-00000-000069

For further information or to comment on our proposals see our website: www.thamestunnelconsultation.co.uk

It is very important that you understand the information we have provided. If you need further information in another language, braille, large print or audio format please contact us on 0800 0721 086.
32