Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
C had
shorter gelation times but higher pH at gelation, G
/
, permeability and whey
separation. Loss tangent of all gels increased to a maximum shortly after gelation.
Microstructure of gels formed with a bacterial culture was not greatly aected by
gelation temperature in contrast to GDL-induced gels. #1999 Canadian Institute
of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved
Keywords: acid milk gels, yoghurt, rheology, microstructure, permeability, whey
separation, yield stress
INTRODUCTION
Fermented milk products are produced throughout the
world with yoghurt being one of the most popular. Milk
is acidied by bacterial cultures, which ferment lactose
to lactic acid. The manufacture of fermented milks has
previously been reviewed (Tamime and Robinson, 1988;
Robinson and Tamime, 1993; Mulvihill and Gruerty,
1995; Tamime and Marshall, 1997). In the production
of yoghurt the culture consists of Lactococcus del-
brueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus salivarius
subsp. thermophilus. It is generally accepted that the
type and character of the starter organisms used in the
production of fermented milks are important factors
determining the overall quality of the nal product
(Tamime and Marshall, 1997). Milk acidication has
been simulated by the use of glucono--lactone (GDL)
where the hydrolysis of GDL to gluconic acid results in
a reduction in pH. GDL has been extensively used to
model the acidication of milk although no detailed
comparison of the rheological, microstructural and
physical properties of gels made by GDL or bacterial
fermentation has been reported.
There have been several reports on the rheological
properties of acid milk gels formed by the use of GDL
(e.g., Arshad et al., 1993; Cobos et al., 1995; van Vliet
and Keetels, 1995; Lucey et al., 1997a,b) or bacterial
fermentation (Biliaderis et al., 1992; Ro nnega rd and
Dejmek, 1993) but very few studies have compared the
Food Research International, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 147155, 1998
# 1999 Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology
Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
Printed in Great Britain
P I I : S 0 9 6 3 - 9 9 6 9 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 0 7 5 - 1 0963-9969/99/$see front matter
147
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 0064 6
350 5034; fax: 0064 6 350 5655;
e-mail: J.A.Lucey@massey.ac.nz
properties of gels formed by the two methods (van
Marle and Zoon, 1995). The use of GDL in model stu-
dies avoids some of the diculties associated with star-
ter bacteria including variable activity and variation
with type of culture used (e.g., ropy or non-ropy).
Model studies on the formation of acid milk gels with
GDL have normally used a low gelation temperature
(30
C.
The objective of the present study was to determine
the eect of two types of acidifying agents (GDL and a
bacterial culture) on the rheological properties, perme-
ability, whey separation and microstructure of acid skim
milk gels. The bacterial culture used for these experi-
ments has been used in previous studies (e.g., Dannen-
berg and Kessler, 1988a,b) and is a fast acidifying,
mixed-strain, non-ropy culture. Two gelation tempera-
tures were used corresponding to the high temperatures
used in yoghurt manufacture and the low temperatures
often used for model studies with GDL or the (slow)
overnight incubation of fermented milks.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Low-heat skim milk powder (SMP) was supplied by the
New Zealand Dairy Board (Wellington). The whey
protein nitrogen index of the low-heat SMP was 6.4 mg
undenatured whey protein/g powder. GDL was sup-
plied by Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO 63178, USA).
Starter culture was supplied by Wiesby Starter Cultures
and Media (D-25899 Niebu ll, Germany).
Reconstitution of skim milk powder and heat treatment
Reconstituted skim milks were prepared by adding 12 g
SMP to 100 g demineralized water. The solutions were
stirred for at least 2 h at 25
C for 30
min. The time reported included that time required for
the milks to come up to temperature, which was nor-
mally 23 min. After holding for 30 min, milks were
rapidly cooled to the gelation temperature by
immersion in ice-water.
GDL-induced acidication
Heated skim milks were acidied with 1.3% (w/w) GDL
at 30 or 42
C, respectively;
frequency was varied from 0.0011.0 Hz.
The large deformation properties of acid milk gels
were also studied by the method described by Lucey et
al. (1997a,b). Gels were made in situ as above and
sheared after ageing for 15 and 6 h, for gels formed at
30 and 42
C the pH
changed slowly for 15 ks but thereafter the pH
decreased steadily (Fig. 2(a)); at 42
C starter bacteria
produced acid faster than at 30
C by the
addition of 2% starter culture and at 30
C by the addi-
tion of 3% GDL. They also found that on addition of
GDL to milk the pH rapidly decreased but later the pH
decreased slowly. On addition of starter culture to milk
there was a period when the pH did not change very
much, in agreement with the results of Amice-Queme-
neur et al. (1995).
Fig. 1. Shear stress as a function of applied deformation in
constant shear rate (0.00185 s
1
) experiment on acid milk gel.
Milk was heat treated at 85
C
by the addition of 1.3% glucono--lactone (GDL). The point
when the shear stress started to decrease was taken as the yield
point.
A comparison of the formation, rheological properties and microstructure of acid skim milk gels 149
Rheological properties
High incubation temperature resulted in a reduction in
the gelation time (Table 1). GDL-induced gels had
much shorter (45 fold) gelation times compared with
bacterial gels. For example, at 30
C decreased slightly
approximately 4 h (pH44.2) after the inoculation of
milk (Fig. 3(b)). In both types of gels made at 42
C
there was an abrupt change in the slope of G
/
versus
time curve, which occurred soon after gelation; a similar
trend was observed by Ro nnega rd and Dejmek (1993).
At the point of gelation when G
/
started to increase, tan
initially decreased to values <0.5 but then increased
and a ``maximumin tan '' was observed at pH5.1. This
transition occurred between pH 5.3 and 5.0. The value of
this ``maximumin tan '' was higher (and occurred over a
longer period) in gels formed with GDL and at high
incubation temperature (Table 1). A``maximumin tan ''
was also observed just after gelation (pH values 5.25.0)
by Biliaderis et al. (1992), Ro nnega rd and Dejmek (1993);
van Marle and Zoon (1995) for microbially acidied high
heat-treated milk samples. This ``maximum in tan '' in
gels made at 42
C where tan
Fig. 2. Changes in pH during the acidication of heated milk
at 30 (a) and 42
C (a) and 42
C
appeared to have a branched interlinked type of micro-
structure (Fig. 5(a)), while gels made at 42
C appeared
to have much less branching or cross-linking, thinner
strands and larger pores (Fig. 5(c)). Gels made with a
bacterial culture (Fig. 5(b) and (d)) appeared to have a
more tortuous or clustered type of network with less
obvious cross-linking than GDL-induced gels made at
30
C 42
C 30
C 42
C
Gelation
b
time (ks) 5.90 0.2 1.62 0.0 29.47 4.9 7.60 1.0
Gelation
b
pH 5.28 0.04 5.54 0.04 5.05 0.06 5.58 0.04
Storage modulus
c
, G
/
(Pa) 439 31 319 32 257 23 194 17
Maximum in tan
d
0.416 0.003 0.528 0.004 0.395 0.003 0.508 0.005
Fracture
e
strain 0.75 0.08 0.69 0.07 0.36 0.08 0.48 0.03
Fracture
e
stress (Pa) 190 30 124 18 41 14 46 7
Permeability coecient (10
13
m
2
) 1.64 0.15 6.51 2.88 1.07 0.07 3.04 0.83
Whey separation
f
(%) 16.30 1.16 18.48 1.29 7.28 0.66 8.41 0.60
a
Mean and standard deviations of triplicate experiments.
b
Gelation time was dened as the point when gels had a G
/
51 Pa.
c
G
/
value at 6 and 15 h for gels formed at 42 and 30
C, respectively.
d
Maximum in tan was dened as the point after gelation when the value of tan increased to a maximum.
e
Fracture was dened as the point when the shear stress started to decrease when gels were subjected to a constant shear rate
(0.00185 s
1
).
f
Whey separation was determined at 6 and 15 h for gels formed at 42 and 30
C, respectively.
Fig. 4. Storage modulus (G
/
) (a) and loss tangent (tan d) (b) of
acid milk gels as a function of frequency. Gels were made from
heated milk by acidication with glucono--lactone (GDL) at
30 (*) and 42
C
was higher than those made at 30
C, especially for
GDL-induced gels; a similar trend was reported by
Lucey et al. (1997c) for GDL-induced casein gels.
GDL-induced gels had much higher levels of whey
separation than bacterial gels (Table 1). Whey separa-
tion increased slightly for both types of gels at high
gelation temperature; a similar trend was reported by
Lucey et al. (1998a) for GDL-induced milk gels.
DISCUSSION
The present study clearly showed that most of the
rheological and physical properties of GDL-and bacte-
rially induced gels (e.g., gelation time and pH, G
/
, yield
stress and strain, B, degree of whey separation and gel
microstructure) were dierent. By contrast, van Marle
and Zoon (1995) found, in acid milk gels made at 32
C
that the G
/
values of GDL-induced gels (1.95% GDL,
pH 5.35) after ageing for approximately 7 h were
similar to bacterial gels that were aged for 16 h. A likely
Fig. 5. Confocal scanning laser micrographs of acid milk gels formed by acidication of heated milk with (a) 1.3% (w/w) glucono-
d-lactone (GDL) at 30
C, (d) 2% (w/w)
starter culture at 42
C for 30 min. Scale bar=10 mm. The protein matrix appears white while
pores appear dark.
152 J. A. Lucey et al.
explanation for these contrasting results is the ageing
time used for comparing the G
/
value; the G
/
value of
GDL-induced gels continued to increase even after
incubation for 7 h at 30
C when G
/
started to decrease once the pH of the gel approached
4.0. The increase in G
/
of gels can be attributed to
increased fusion of particles and clusters (and casein
molecules inside particles) due to rearrangement of both
A comparison of the formation, rheological properties and microstructure of acid skim milk gels 153
inter- and intra-molecular forces (Roefs et al., 1990a;
Lucey et al., 1997b). It may also be possible that the
slow increase in G
/
of acid gels after gelation reects the
incorporation of additional protein clusters into the gel
network (Lucey and Singh, 1997). The decrease in G
/
at
very low pH may be due to an increase in net positive
charge between casein molecules resulting in an increase
in electrostatic repulsion.
Factors that aect the yielding properties of gels
include the number of bonds per cross-section of the
strand, the strength of each bond (van Vliet et al., 1991)
and the tortuosity of the gel network (Bremer et al.,
1990). The method and temperature of gel formation
alters the microstructure of acid gels (Fig. 5), which
would aect the mechanical properties. GDL-induced
gels made at 30